Özçelik et al., 2018
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Özçelik et al. | Marginal Adaptation of Provisional CAD/CAM Restorations Fabricated Using Various Simulated Digital Cement Space Settings. | |
| Kohorst et al. | Marginal accuracy of four‐unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using different computer‐aided design/computer‐aided manufacturing systems | |
| Schaefer et al. | Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate partial crowns in vitro: a three-dimensional analysis of accuracy and reproducibility | |
| Almeida e Silva et al. | Marginal and internal fit of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques | |
| Kohorst et al. | Different CAD/CAM-processing routes for zirconia restorations: influence on fitting accuracy | |
| Khng et al. | In vitro evaluation of the marginal integrity of CAD/CAM interim crowns | |
| Shamseddine et al. | Marginal and internal fit of pressed ceramic crowns made from conventional and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing wax patterns: An in vitro comparison | |
| Karl et al. | Passivity of fit of CAD/CAM and copy-milled frameworks, veneered frameworks, and anatomically contoured, zirconia ceramic, implant-supported fixed prostheses | |
| Ha et al. | Comparison of the fit accuracy of zirconia-based prostheses generated by two CAD/CAM systems | |
| Re et al. | Comparison of marginal fit of Lava CAD/CAM crown-copings with two finish lines | |
| Song et al. | Marginal fit of anterior 3-unit fixed partial zirconia restorations using different CAD/CAM systems | |
| Anunmana et al. | Gap comparison between single crown and three-unit bridge zirconia substructures | |
| El-Ashkar et al. | Evaluation of the marginal and internal gaps of partially crystallized versus fully crystallized zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate CAD-CAM crowns: An in vitro comparison of the silicone replica technique, direct view, and 3-dimensional superimposition analysis | |
| Habib et al. | Effect of anatomic, semi-anatomic and non-anatomic occlusal surface tooth preparations on the adaptation of zirconia copings | |
| Habib et al. | Comparison between five CAD/CAM systems for fit of zirconia copings. | |
| Hajimahmoodi et al. | Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Fit of CAD/CAM Endocrowns with Different Cavity Tapers. | |
| Yatmaz et al. | Accuracy of four recent intraoral scanners with respect to two different ceramic surfaces | |
| Elsherbini et al. | A micro‐computed tomography analysis of internal and marginal fits of fixed partial dentures: Effect of preparation finish line designs on monolithic zirconia and heat‐pressed zirconia‐reinforced lithium disilicate | |
| Yadav et al. | An in vitro comparison of zirconia and hybrid ceramic crowns with heavy chamfer and shoulder finish lines | |
| Özsürmeli et al. | In vitro evaluation of the marginal and internal accuracy of different types of dental ceramic restorations fabricated based on digital and conventional impressions | |
| Pereira et al. | Analysis of Marginal Adaptation of Porcelain Laminate Veneers Produced by Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacturing Technology: A Preliminary In Vitro Study. | |
| Elter et al. | Effect of substrate adjacent to the scan region on the trueness of four intraoral scanners: An in vitro study | |
| Ziaei et al. | Evaluating the Marginal and Internal Discrepancy of Nickel–Chrome Copings Made on Fixed Partial Denture Implants with Conventional and 3D Printing Techniques | |
| Altan et al. | Evaluation of the marginal fit of finish line designs of novel CAD/CAM restoration materials | |
| Saleh et al. | EffEct of diffErEnt pattErn construction tEchniquEs on thE marginal adaptation, intErnal fit and fracturE rEsistancE of ips-Emax prEss crowns |