Hamza, 2016
ViewPDF| Publication | Publication Date | Title | 
|---|---|---|
| Patel et al. | Fibular reconstruction of the maxilla and mandible with immediate implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation: jaw in a day | |
| López et al. | Potential deviation factors affecting stereolithographic surgical guides: a systematic review | |
| Chen et al. | Accuracy of flapless immediate implant placement in anterior maxilla using computer‐assisted versus freehand surgery: a cadaver study | |
| Sun et al. | Dental implant navigation system guide the surgery future | |
| Van Assche et al. | Accuracy of implant placement based on pre‐surgical planning of three‐dimensional cone‐beam images: a pilot study | |
| Ersoy et al. | Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants | |
| Kühl et al. | Accuracy of full guided vs. half‐guided implant surgery | |
| D'haese et al. | Current state of the art of computer‐guided implant surgery | |
| Behneke et al. | Accuracy assessment of cone beam computed tomography‐derived laboratory‐based surgical templates on partially edentulous patients | |
| Vercruyssen et al. | Different techniques of static/dynamic guided implant surgery: modalities and indications | |
| Kalaivani et al. | Expectation and reality of guided implant surgery protocol using computer-assisted static and dynamic navigation system at present scenario: Evidence-based literature review | |
| Koop et al. | Tolerance within the sleeve inserts of different surgical guides for guided implant surgery | |
| Kola et al. | Surgical templates for dental implant positioning; current knowledge and clinical perspectives | |
| Vercruyssen et al. | Guided surgery: accuracy and efficacy | |
| Vasak et al. | Computed tomography‐based evaluation of template (NobelGuide™)‐guided implant positions: a prospective radiological study | |
| Sarment et al. | Stereolithographic surgical templates for placement of dental implants in complex cases. | |
| Van Assche et al. | Accuracy assessment of computer‐assisted flapless implant placement in partial edentulism | |
| Ozan et al. | Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement | |
| Behneke et al. | Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT‐derived template‐based implant placement | |
| Vercruyssen et al. | The use of CT scan based planning for oral rehabilitation by means of implants and its transfer to the surgical field: a critical review on accuracy | |
| Lal et al. | Use of stereolithographic templates for surgical and prosthodontic implant planning and placement. Part I. The concept | |
| Ozan et al. | Correlation between bone density and angular deviation of implants placed using CT-generated surgical guides | |
| Stübinger et al. | Deviations between placed and planned implant positions: an accuracy pilot study of skeletally supported stereolithographic surgical templates | |
| Ganz | Cone beam computed tomography–assisted treatment planning concepts | |
| Berdougo et al. | Flapless implant surgery using an image‐guided system. A 1‐to 4‐year retrospective multicenter comparative clinical study |