Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


US8761479B2 - System and method for analyzing and visualizing spectral CT data - Google Patents

System and method for analyzing and visualizing spectral CT data
Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US8761479B2
US8761479B2US12/941,162US94116210AUS8761479B2US 8761479 B2US8761479 B2US 8761479B2US 94116210 AUS94116210 AUS 94116210AUS 8761479 B2US8761479 B2US 8761479B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
spectral
trois
curves
data
target
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active, expires
Application number
US12/941,162
Other versions
US20120114206A1 (en
Inventor
Gopal Biligeri Avinash
Sandeep Dutta
Saad Ahmed Sirohey
Ananth P. Mohan
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
GE Precision Healthcare LLC
Original Assignee
General Electric Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by General Electric CofiledCriticalGeneral Electric Co
Priority to US12/941,162priorityCriticalpatent/US8761479B2/en
Assigned to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANYreassignmentGENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANYASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS).Assignors: SIROHEY, SAAD AHMED, AVINASH, GOPAL BILIGERI, DUTTA, SANDEEP, MOHAN, ANANTH P.
Priority to FR1060957Aprioritypatent/FR2967283B1/en
Priority to CN2010106236842Aprioritypatent/CN102462504A/en
Publication of US20120114206A1publicationCriticalpatent/US20120114206A1/en
Application grantedgrantedCritical
Publication of US8761479B2publicationCriticalpatent/US8761479B2/en
Assigned to GE Precision Healthcare LLCreassignmentGE Precision Healthcare LLCNUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS).Assignors: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Activelegal-statusCriticalCurrent
Adjusted expirationlegal-statusCritical

Links

Images

Classifications

Definitions

Landscapes

Abstract

A system and method for analyzing and visualizing spectral CT data includes access of a set of image data acquired from a patient comprising spectral CT data, identification of a plurality of target regions of interest (TROIs) and a reference region of interest (RROI) from the set of image data, extraction of a plurality of target spectral Hounsfield unit (HU) curves from image data representing the plurality of TROIs, extraction of a reference spectral HU curve from image data representing the RROI, normalization of the plurality of target spectral HU curves with respect to the reference spectral HU curve, and display of the plurality of normalized target spectral HU curves.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Embodiments of the invention relate generally to diagnostic imaging and, more particularly, to a system and method for analyzing and visualizing spectral computed tomography (CT) data.
Typically, in CT imaging systems, an x-ray source emits a fan-shaped beam toward a subject or object, such as a patient or a piece of luggage. Hereinafter, the terms “subject” and “object” shall include anything capable of being imaged. The beam, after being attenuated by the subject, impinges upon an array of radiation detectors. The intensity of the attenuated beam radiation received at the detector array is typically dependent upon the attenuation of the x-ray beam by the subject. Each detector element of the detector array produces a separate electrical signal indicative of the attenuated beam received by each detector element. The electrical signals are transmitted to a data processing system for analysis that ultimately produces an image.
Generally, the x-ray source and the detector assembly are rotated about the gantry within an imaging plane and around the subject. X-ray sources typically include x-ray tubes, which emit the x-ray beam at a focal point. The detector assembly is typically made of a plurality of detector modules. Data representing the intensity of the received x-ray beam at each of the detector elements is collected across a range of gantry angles. The data are ultimately processed to form an image.
Conventional CT systems emit an x-ray with a polychromatic spectrum. The x-ray attenuation of each material in the subject depends on the energy of the emitted x-ray. If CT projection data is acquired at multiple x-ray energy levels or spectra, the data contains additional information about the subject or object being imaged that is not contained within a conventional CT image. For example, spectral CT data can be used to produce a new image with x-ray attenuation coefficients equivalent to a chosen monochromatic energy. Such a monochromatic image includes image data where the intensity values of the voxels are assigned as if a CT image were created by collecting projection data from the subject with a monochromatic x-ray beam.
A principle objective of energy sensitive scanning is to obtain diagnostic CT images that enhance information (contrast separation, material specificity, etc.) within the image by utilizing two or more scans at different chromatic energy states. A number of techniques have been proposed to achieve energy sensitive scanning including acquiring two or more scans either (1) back-to-back sequentially in time where the scans require multiple rotations of the gantry around the subject or (2) interleaved as a function of the rotation angle requiring one rotation around the subject, in which the tube operates at, for instance, 80 kVp and 140 kVp potentials.
High frequency generators have made it possible to switch the kVp potential of the high frequency electromagnetic energy projection source on alternating views. As a result, data for two or more energy sensitive scans may be obtained in a temporally interleaved fashion rather than two separate scans made several seconds apart as typically occurs with previous CT technology. The interleaved projection data may furthermore be registered so that the same path lengths are defined at each energy level using, for example, some form of interpolation.
Spectral CT data facilitates better discrimination of tissues, making it easier to differentiate between materials such as tissues containing calcium and iodine, for example. However, tissue behavior changes depending on a number of variables, such as patient thickness, contrast concentration and injection rate, timing of imaging, and tissue pathology. As such, the range and complexity of data available from spectral CT imaging makes the data difficult for a clinician to easily understand, interpret, discriminate, and make informed decisions. While known systems and methods can be employed to create and display monochromatic images, known systems and methods simply display images created using spectral CT data, and are lacking in regard to user interaction and analysis.
Further, making a diagnosis based on review of an image is a very specialized task and is typically performed by highly-trained medical image experts. However, even such experts can only make a subjective call as to the degree of severity of the disease. Due to this inherent subjectivity, the diagnoses tend to be inconsistent and non-standardized.
Accordingly, in order to use the data in a clinically relevant manner, there is a need for a methodology to compare spectral CT data across patients in a consistent fashion in spite of the above-described unavoidable and uncontrollable variables inherent in spectral CT data.
Therefore, it would be desirable to design a system and method of analyzing and visualizing spectral CT data that overcomes the aforementioned drawbacks.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with one aspect of the invention, a non-transitory computer readable medium has stored thereon a computer program comprising instructions, which, when executed by a computer, cause the computer to access a set of image data acquired from a patient, the set of image data comprising spectral computed tomography (CT) data. The instructions also cause the computer to identify a plurality of target regions of interest (TROIs) from the set of image data, identify a reference region of interest (RROI) from the set of image data, and extract a plurality of target spectral Hounsfield unit (HU) curves from image data representing the plurality of TROIs. Further, instructions cause the computer to extract a reference spectral HU curve from image data representing the RROI, normalize the plurality of target spectral HU curves with respect to the reference spectral HU curve, and display the plurality of normalized target spectral HU curves.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a method includes accessing an image dataset comprising spectral CT data acquired from a patient, creating a plurality of TROIs from the image dataset, and extracting a target dataset from the image dataset, the target dataset comprising image data corresponding to the TROIs. The method also includes computing a plurality of target spectral curves from the target dataset, each target spectral curve representing x-ray attenuation for a respective TROI, creating a RROI from the image dataset, and extracting a reference dataset from the image dataset, the reference dataset comprising image data corresponding to the RROI. Further, the method includes computing a reference spectral curve from the reference dataset, normalizing the plurality of target spectral curves with the reference spectral curve, and outputting a visualization of the plurality of normalized target spectral curves.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a system for analyzing image data includes a database having stored thereon a patient image dataset acquired from a patient that includes spectral CT data. The system also includes a processor that is programmed to access the image dataset, identify a plurality of TROIs from the patient image dataset, and identify at least one RROI from the patient image dataset. The processor is also programmed to extract spectral CT data for the plurality of TROIs and the RROI from the patient image dataset, generate a plurality of target curves for the plurality of TROIs from the extracted spectral CT data, and generate at least one reference curve for the at least one RROI from the extracted spectral CT data. Further, the processor is programmed to normalize the plurality of target curves with the at least one reference curve, and output the plurality of normalized target curves. The system also includes a graphical user interface (GUI) configured to display the plurality of normalized target curves to a user.
Various other features and advantages will be made apparent from the following detailed description and the drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The drawings illustrate preferred embodiments presently contemplated for carrying out the invention.
In the drawings:
FIG. 1 is a pictorial view of a CT imaging system.
FIG. 2 is a block schematic diagram of the system illustrated inFIG. 1.
FIG. 3 is a perspective view of one embodiment of a CT system detector array.
FIG. 4 is a perspective view of one embodiment of a detector.
FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating a technique for visualization and analysis of spectral CT data in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 6 is a plot of exemplary raw spectral CT data for a number of regions of interest in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 7 is a plot of the spectral CT data ofFIG. 6 normalized with respect to a reference region of interest in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 8 is a plot of exemplary metrics extracted from the normalized spectral CT data ofFIG. 7 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 9 is a plot of a set of exemplary metrics having an overlap region in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 10 is an exemplary user interface that includes a visual representation of deviation of a number of regions of interest in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 11 is a pictorial view of a CT system for use with a non-invasive package inspection system.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
The operating environment of the invention is described with respect to a sixty-four-slice computed tomography (CT) system. However, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the invention is equally applicable for use with other multi-slice configurations. Moreover, the invention will be described with respect to the detection and conversion of x-rays. However, one skilled in the art will further appreciate that the invention is equally applicable for the detection and conversion of other high frequency electromagnetic energy. The invention will be described with respect to a “third generation” CT scanner, but is equally applicable with other CT systems.
In addition, certain embodiments of the present invention provide systems, methods, and computer instructions for analyzing multi-energy data, such as dual energy data, for example. Certain multi-energy data can be used in spectral imaging systems, such as photon counting systems, for example. Dual energy data, which is a type of multi-energy data, can be embodied in monochromatic images, material density images, and/or effective-Z images. While many of the embodiments described herein are discussed in connection with dual energy data, the embodiments are not limited to dual energy data and can be used in connection with other types of multi-energy data, as one skilled in the art will appreciate. Also, while many of the embodiments discussed herein discussed describe a region of interest that can be selected in an image, a volume of interest can also be selected in an image, as one skilled in the art will appreciate.
Referring toFIG. 1, aCT imaging system10 is shown as including agantry12 representative of a “third generation” CT scanner.Gantry12 has anx-ray source14 that projects a beam of x-rays toward a detector assembly orcollimator16 on the opposite side of thegantry12. Referring now toFIG. 2,detector assembly16 is formed by a plurality ofdetectors18 and data acquisition systems (DAS)20. The plurality ofdetectors18 sense the projectedx-rays22 that pass through amedical patient24, andDAS20 converts the data to digital signals for subsequent processing. Eachdetector18 produces an analog electrical signal that represents the intensity of an impinging x-ray beam and hence the attenuated beam as it passes through thepatient24. During a scan to acquire x-ray projection data,gantry12 and the components mounted thereon rotate about a center ofrotation26.
Rotation ofgantry12 and the operation ofx-ray source14 are governed by acontrol mechanism28 ofCT system10.Control mechanism28 includes anx-ray controller30 that provides power and timing signals to anx-ray source14 and agantry motor controller32 that controls the rotational speed and position ofgantry12. Animage reconstructor34 receives sampled and digitized x-ray data fromDAS20 and performs high speed reconstruction. The reconstructed image is applied as an input to acomputer36 which stores the image in amass storage device38.
Computer36 also receives commands and scanning parameters from an operator viaconsole40 that has some form of operator interface, such as a keyboard, mouse, voice activated controller, or any other suitable input apparatus. An associateddisplay42 allows the operator to observe the reconstructed image and other data fromcomputer36. The operator supplied commands and parameters are used bycomputer36 to provide control signals and information toDAS20,x-ray controller30 andgantry motor controller32. In addition,computer36 operates atable motor controller44 which controls a motorized table46 to positionpatient24 andgantry12. Particularly, table46 movespatients24 through agantry opening48 ofFIG. 1 in whole or in part.
As shown inFIG. 3,detector assembly16 includesrails50 having collimating blades orplates52 placed therebetween.Plates52 are positioned to collimatex-rays22 before such beams impinge upon, for instance,detector18 ofFIG. 4 positioned ondetector assembly16. In one embodiment,detector assembly16 includes 57detectors18, eachdetector18 having an array size of 64×22 ofpixel elements54. As a result,detector assembly16 has 64 rows and 912 columns (22×57 detectors) which allows 64 simultaneous slices of data to be collected with each rotation ofgantry12.
Referring toFIG. 4,detector18 includesDAS20, with eachdetector18 including a number ofdetector elements54 arranged inpack56.Detectors18 includepins58 positioned withinpack56 relative todetector elements54.Pack56 is positioned on abacklit diode array60 having a plurality ofdiodes62.Backlit diode array60 is in turn positioned onmulti-layer substrate64.Spacers66 are positioned onmulti-layer substrate64.Detector elements54 are optically coupled tobacklit diode array60, and backlitdiode array60 is in turn electrically coupled tomulti-layer substrate64.Flex circuits68 are attached to face70 ofmulti-layer substrate64 and toDAS20.Detectors18 are positioned withindetector assembly16 by use ofpins58.
In the operation of one embodiment, x-rays impinging withindetector elements54 generate photons whichtraverse pack56, thereby generating an analog signal which is detected on a diode withinbacklit diode array60. The analog signal generated is carried throughmulti-layer substrate64, throughflex circuits68, toDAS20 wherein the analog signal is converted to a digital signal.
Referring now toFIG. 5, atechnique72 for analyzing and visualizing spectral CT data is set forth according to an embodiment of the invention. While some embodiments described herein are directed to liver lesion analysis, one skilled in the art will readily recognize thattechnique72 may be applied for the analysis of spectral CT data for a range of tissues according to various embodiments, for example, tissue found in the brain, kidneys, liver, etc.
Technique72 begins atstep74 by accessing a spectral CT dataset acquired from a patient. The spectral CT dataset may be accessed from a storage location or from a live or real-time scan, according to various embodiments. Also, the spectral CT dataset may include image data acquired during a single scan of the patient or during a series of patient scans. Atstep76, one or more target regions of interest (TROIs) are selected from the spectral CT dataset. Each TROI may be selected manually, semi-automatically, or automatically according to various embodiments using any combination of available image manipulation tools such as ROI selection, registration, segmentation, contouring, etc. For example, a clinician may select a TROI using an input device on an operator console (e.g.,operator console40 ofFIG. 2) by drawing a contour around the TROI in an image of the patient on a display (e.g., display42 ofFIG. 2). As another example, a TROI may be identified using an automated or semi-automated algorithm. In the exemplary liver lesion embodiment, TROIs may correspond to regions including suspected cysts and metastatic tumors.
Spectral Hounsfield Unit (HU) curves are extracted from the spectral CT dataset associated with each TROI atstep78. The HU curves are extracted by calculating HU data at a number of discrete keV levels for each TROI. Various methods may be used to compute the HU data at each keV level. For example, the HU data at each keV level may be calculated as the mean intensity within the respective TROI. One skilled in the art will recognize that numerous alternative methods may be used to compute the HU data.
Atstep80, one or more reference regions of interest (RROI) is selected from the spectral CT dataset. The RROI is used to normalize the TROIs under review, as explained in detail below. According to one embodiment, the RROI is selected to represent healthy tissue. As with the TROI, the RROI may be identified manually, semi-automatically, or automatically. Spectral HU curves are extracted from the spectral CT dataset associated with each RROI atstep82 in a similar manner as discussed above with respect to TROIs instep78.
Referring now toFIG. 6, an exemplary chart of spectral HU curves84 is illustrated according to one embodiment. Exemplary TROI curves86,88,90,92,94,96,98,100,102,104, and106 correspond to eleven respective TROIs selected from the spectral CT dataset, as described with respect to step76 ofFIG. 4. Exemplaryreference ROI curve108 corresponds to an RROI selected from the spectral CT dataset, such as, for example, liver parenchyma, as described with respect to step80 ofFIG. 5. As shown, the exemplary spectral HU data was calculated for each TROI and RROI at ten discrete keV values over a range of 40 keV to 140 keV. However, one skilled in the art will recognize that any number of discrete keV data points and/or any range of keV values may be used in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
Referring back toFIG. 5, normalized curves for the TROIs are computed atstep110 using the RROI(s). This normalization step adjusts, scales, or otherwise transforms the TROI curves based on the RROI curve in order to facilitate a comparative analysis between the various TROIs. The TROI curves may be normalized using various known methods of normalization. For example, the TROI curves may be divided by the RROI curve by computing the value of the TROI divided by the RROI at each keV level. In an embodiment using multiple RROIs, an average value of the HU data of the RROI curves at each keV level may be used for the division. Atstep112,technique72 outputs the normalized TROI curves.
FIG. 7 provides anexemplary plot114 of computed normalized TROI curves116,118,120,122,124,126,128,130,132,134, and136 for the illustrative liver lesion example. Normalized curves116-136 represent TROI curves86-106 ofFIG. 6 normalized with respect toRROI curve108 ofFIG. 6.Plot114 illustrates how normalizing the TROI curves may be used to discriminate between two types of tissue, forexample cysts138 andtumors140 in the liver. While normalized TROI curves116-136 are illustrated on a line plot, alternative visual formats may be used to display the TROI curves to a user, including charts, graphs, colors, and the like.
Returning toFIG. 5,technique72 analyzes the normalized TROI curves atstep142 to derive or extract metrics corresponding to the normalized TROI curves. Numerous methods may be applied to analyze the data. For example, metrics may be extracted from the data via aggregation by summing data across keV levels or performing total area calculations. Alternatively, metrics may be derived using an averaging method, such as, for example, calculating a standard deviation, central tendency, median, or minimum/maximum. As yet another example, metrics may be calculated to represent a rate of decay or change of the normalized TROI curves as a function of keV level.
Atstep144, a threshold is applied to the derived metrics to facilitate comparative analysis between the TROIs. The threshold is selected to distinguish between two different tissue types, such as, for example, cysts and metastatic tumors, as described in more detail with respect toFIG. 8. Whilestep144 oftechnique72 is described with respect to a single threshold, it is contemplated that multiple thresholds may be applied to distinguish between any number of distinct tissue types. As such, tissue corresponding to numerous types of tissue may be simultaneously analyzed in a single display.
FIG. 8 is achart146 illustrating derivedmetrics148,150,152,154,156,158,160,162,164,166,168 for respective normalized TROI curves116-136 (FIG. 7) in the liver lesion example. Metrics148-168 are calculated from the HU data corresponding to TROIs86-106 (FIG. 6). Metrics148-168 may be calculated from HU data at all or a subset of the discrete keV levels using any number of techniques, such as, for example, aggregation, averaging, or calculating a rate of decay. In one embodiment, metrics148-168 are calculated by averaging the HU data at discrete keV levels. As one example, data at two keV levels from each extremity (i.e., 40 and 50 keV and 130 and 140 keV) is ignored. Thus, the metrics are calculated across the 60-120 keV levels. However, the metrics may be calculated from any portion of the HU data. Athreshold170 included inchart146 greatly facilitates the comparative analysis between metrics148-168 and is selected to distinguish between two tissue types. As shown,threshold170 makes it easy to quickly distinguish between TROIs representing cysts (metrics150,154-162, and168) and TROIs representing metastatic tumors (metrics148,152,164, and166).
FIG. 8 represents an ideal case example, wherethreshold170 provides a clear delineation between metrics representing two distinct types of tissue. In some instances, however, an overlap region may occur between metrics representing different tissue types. Nonetheless, an observable difference between the values of the metrics is still exhibited by each tissue type. Thus, referring again totechnique72 ofFIG. 5, probabilities may be assigned to the derived metrics atstep172 to facilitate the categorization of metrics that fall within the overlapping zone. As described in detail below with respect toFIG. 9, the probabilities are incorporated into the display of metrics provided to the user, providing “decision-support” assistance of sorts. Once again, any number of distinct tissue types with multiple corresponding thresholds and/or regions of overlap may be simultaneously analyzed in this fashion in a single display.
Referring now toFIG. 9, a number of derivedmetrics174 calculated from TROI normalized curves are displayed on achart176 in a similar manner as described with respect toFIG. 8. Unlike metrics148-168 ofFIG. 8, however,metrics174 ofchart176 have a distinct region ofoverlap178 or confidence interval surrounding athreshold180.Metrics174 falling withinoverlap region178 may be assigned a probability of corresponding to a particular tissue type using a statistical analysis, such as, for example, a statistical deviation. For example, according to one embodiment,metrics174 that are withinoverlap region178 and are belowthreshold180 may be assigned an 80% probability of being a cyst, whilemetrics174 that are withinoverlap region178 and are abovethreshold180 may be assigned an 80% probability of being a metastatic tumor.
The above-described embodiments effectuate tissue categorization of TROIs in a patient by normalizing the TROI data with respect to a reference region defined within the same patient. Reference data may also be used to analyze the quantified spectral CT data for each TROI. Referring back toFIG. 5, a reference database is accessed atstep182. In one embodiment, the reference database contains pre-computed image data acquired from a reference population that represents a pre-defined “expected” tissue behavior. For example, the reference database may include reference data for ROIs containing cysts, may contain data for “normal” or “healthy” tissue, or contain reference data corresponding to a vessel of the patient that is known to have contrast flowing into. Reference image data may be collected from a population of individuals and grouped or standardized according to one or more desired characteristics, such as age, gender, or race.
Comparison between the patient's TROI data and the pre-computed reference data occurs atstep184 through the calculation of a deviation metric. First, the normalized TROI metrics calculated atstep142 are normalized with respect to a set of associated reference metrics calculated from the pre-computed reference data. The normalization accounts for and/or eliminates unavoidable and uncontrollable variables that exist in a given spectral CT dataset. For example, there may be variability in the given spectral CT dataset with respect to the reference database due to a difference in amount of contrast agent used during the scan, the contrast uptake rate may vary between the patient and reference population, and patient size may differ between datasets. Normalization accounts for this variability.
After the patient metrics and reference metrics are normalized, deviation metrics are calculated to represent the deviation between the normalized TROI metrics and the reference metrics. Numerous techniques may be applied to calculate the deviation of the TROI metrics with respect to the pre-computed reference data. In one embodiment, the deviation is defined by a z-score generally corresponding to the number of standard deviations in the difference between the patient TROI metric and the average value of the reference population for a given tissue type.
Atstep186 the deviation metrics are displayed to a user. Numerous methods exist to display the actual deviation metrics in a meaningful manner to the user. For example, simple or advanced graphing and plotting techniques may be applied in a similar manner as illustrated with respect toFIGS. 6-9. Alternatively, color-coding and other visualization techniques may also be used as illustrated inFIG. 10.
FIG. 10 illustrates an exemplary graphical user interface (GUI)188 that may be used to display visual representations of ROIs, such as ROIs selected atsteps76,80 (FIG. 5), visual representations of spectral curves, such as HU curves computed atsteps78,82 or normalized curves ofsteps110,112 (FIG. 5), and visual representations of deviation metrics, such as metrics extracted atstep142 or metrics calculated at step184 (FIG. 5).
GUI188 includes aregion190 for displaying numeric and textual data, according to various embodiments, including patient image data, reference image data, patient-specific data, reference-specific data, and exam data, as examples. Optionally,region190 may be configured as a control panel to permit a user to input and/or select data through input fields, dropdown menus, etc.GUI188 also includes a number of user-selectable buttons192 to facilitate user interaction withGUI188. As shown,buttons192 may provide functionality for adding a target ROI, reference ROI, or initiating analysis, as examples.
GUI188 includes afirst image region194 that displays patient image data, allowing a user to select any number oftarget ROIs196,198 and any number ofreference ROIs200 in theimage region194. In one embodiment,reference ROI200 is selected to correspond to normal tissue. ROIs196-200 alternatively may be selected by an automated algorithm and displayed to a user inregion194.
GUI188 also includes aregion202 for visualizing plots of spectral curves, such as plot84 (FIG. 6) or plot114 (FIG. 7), and/or plots of metrics, such as plot144 (FIG. 8) or plot176 (FIG. 9). Whileregion202 is shown as displaying a single plot,region202 may also be configured to simultaneously display multiple plots.GUI188 also includes aregion204 for displaying quantified spectra CT data for the selected target ROIs. Acommon color scale206 is provided to normalize the quantified spectral CT data for the target ROIs so that the deviation may be compared across target ROIs. Thus, a TROI having spectral CT data that deviates greatly from the RROI is coded to correlate to afirst end208 ofcolor scale206 while a TROI with spectral CT data that closely correlates to the RROI is displayed to correspond to asecond end210 ofcolor scale206, oppositefirst end208.
GUI188 includes asecond image region212 that displaystarget ROIs196,198 color-coded to correspond tocolor scale206, thereby allowing a user to quickly and easily visualize the deviation ofTROIs196,198. It is noted that the arrangement ofGUI188 is provided merely for explanatory purposes, and that other GUI arrangements, field names, and visual outputs may take different forms. Additional display techniques may also include temperature gauges, graphs, dials, font variations, annotations, and the like.
Referring now toFIG. 11, package/baggage inspection system214 includes arotatable gantry216 having anopening218 therein through which packages or pieces of baggage may pass. Therotatable gantry216 houses a high frequencyelectromagnetic energy source220 as well as adetector assembly222 having scintillator arrays comprised of scintillator cells similar to that shown inFIG. 3 or4. Aconveyor system224 is also provided and includes aconveyor belt226 supported bystructure228 to automatically and continuously pass packages orbaggage pieces230 throughopening218 to be scanned.Objects230 are fed throughopening218 byconveyor belt226, imaging data is then acquired, and theconveyor belt226 removes thepackages230 from opening218 in a controlled and continuous manner. As a result, postal inspectors, baggage handlers, and other security personnel may non-invasively inspect the contents ofpackages230 for explosives, knives, guns, contraband, etc.
A technical contribution for the disclosed method and apparatus is that is provides for a computer implemented system and method of analyzing and visualizing spectral CT data.
One skilled in the art will appreciate that embodiments of the invention may be interfaced to and controlled by a computer readable storage medium having stored thereon a computer program. The computer readable storage medium includes a plurality of components such as one or more of electronic components, hardware components, and/or computer software components. These components may include one or more computer readable storage media that generally stores instructions such as software, firmware and/or assembly language for performing one or more portions of one or more implementations or embodiments of a sequence. These computer readable storage media are generally non-transitory and/or tangible. Examples of such a computer readable storage medium include a recordable data storage medium of a computer and/or storage device. The computer readable storage media may employ, for example, one or more of a magnetic, electrical, optical, biological, and/or atomic data storage medium. Further, such media may take the form of, for example, floppy disks, magnetic tapes, CD-ROMs, DVD-ROMs, hard disk drives, and/or electronic memory. Other forms of non-transitory and/or tangible computer readable storage media not list may be employed with embodiments of the invention.
A number of such components can be combined or divided in an implementation of a system. Further, such components may include a set and/or series of computer instructions written in or implemented with any of a number of programming languages, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. In addition, other forms of computer readable media such as a carrier wave may be employed to embody a computer data signal representing a sequence of instructions that when executed by one or more computers causes the one or more computers to perform one or more portions of one or more implementations or embodiments of a sequence.
Therefore, in accordance with one embodiment, a non-transitory computer readable medium has stored thereon a computer program comprising instructions, which, when executed by a computer, cause the computer to access a set of image data acquired from a patient, the set of image data comprising spectral CT data. The instructions also cause the computer to identify a plurality of TROIs from the set of image data, identify a RROI from the set of image data, and extract a plurality of target spectral HU curves from image data representing the plurality of TROIs. Further, instructions cause the computer to extract a reference spectral HU curve from image data representing the RROI, normalize the plurality of target spectral HU curves with respect to the reference spectral HU curve, and display the plurality of normalized target spectral HU curves.
In accordance with another embodiment, a method includes accessing an image dataset comprising spectral CT data acquired from a patient, creating a plurality of TROIs from the image dataset, and extracting a target dataset from the image dataset, the target dataset comprising image data corresponding to the TROIs. The method also includes computing a plurality of target spectral curves from the target dataset, each target spectral curve representing x-ray attenuation for a respective TROI, creating a RROI from the image dataset, and extracting a reference dataset from the image dataset, the reference dataset comprising image data corresponding to the RROI. Further, the method includes computing a reference spectral curve from the reference dataset, normalizing the plurality of target spectral curves with the reference spectral curve, and outputting a visualization of the plurality of normalized target spectral curves.
In accordance with yet another embodiment, a system for analyzing image data includes a database having stored thereon a patient image dataset acquired from a patient that includes spectral CT data. The system also includes a processor that is programmed to access the image dataset, identify a plurality of TROIs from the patient image dataset, and identify at least one RROI from the patient image dataset. The processor is also programmed to extract spectral CT data for the plurality of TROIs and the RROI from the patient image dataset, generate a plurality of target curves for the plurality of TROIs from the extracted spectral CT data, and generate at least one reference curve for the at least one RROI from the extracted spectral CT data. Further, the processor is programmed to normalize the plurality of target curves with the at least one reference curve, and output the plurality of normalized target curves. The system also includes a GUI configured to display the plurality of normalized target curves to a user.
This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the invention, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal languages of the claims.

Claims (26)

What is claimed is:
1. A non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon a computer program comprising instructions, which, when executed by a computer, cause the computer to:
access a set of image data acquired from a patient, the set of image data comprising spectral computed tomography (CT) data;
identify a plurality of target regions of interest (TROIs) in the patient from the set of image data;
identify a reference region of interest (RROI) in the patient from the set of image data;
extract a plurality of target spectral Hounsfield unit (HU) curves from image data representing the plurality of TROIs;
extract a reference spectral HU curve from image data representing the RROI;
normalize the plurality of target spectral HU curves with respect to the reference spectral HU curve; and
display the plurality of normalized target spectral HU curves.
2. The computer readable medium ofclaim 1 wherein the instructions further cause the computer to calculate a plurality of metrics from the normalized target spectral HU curves to represent the plurality of TROIs.
3. The computer readable medium ofclaim 2 wherein the instructions cause the computer to calculate an average HU value for each of the plurality of normalized target spectral HU curves.
4. The computer readable medium ofclaim 2 wherein the instructions that cause the computer to calculate the plurality of metrics from HU at a plurality of discrete keV levels of the normalized target spectral HU curves.
5. The computer readable medium ofclaim 2 wherein the instructions further cause the computer to apply a threshold to the plurality of metrics, wherein the threshold distinguishes a first type of anatomy from a second type of anatomy.
6. The computer readable medium ofclaim 5 wherein the instructions further cause the computer to define a confidence interval near the threshold to aid in distinguishing TROIs corresponding to the first type of anatomy from TROIs corresponding to the second type of anatomy.
7. The computer readable medium ofclaim 2 wherein the instructions further cause the computer to output a visualization of the plurality of metrics.
8. The computer readable medium ofclaim 1 wherein the instructions further cause the computer to:
access a comparison database comprising pre-computed image data acquired from a reference population;
identify a set of reference spectral CT data from the comparison database, the set of reference spectral CT data representing expected spectral CT data for at least one tissue type;
compare the plurality of normalized target spectral HU curves to the set of reference spectral CT data; and
generate a plurality of deviation metrics from the plurality of normalized target spectral HU curves, the plurality of deviation metrics representing deviation of the plurality of TROIs with respect to the set of reference spectral CT data.
9. The computer readable medium ofclaim 1 wherein the instructions further cause the computer to:
apply a threshold to the plurality of normalized target spectral HU curves;
generate an upper set of TROIs to include TROIs of the plurality of TROIs having normalized target spectral HU curves that are above the threshold;
generate a lower set of TROIs to include TROIs of the plurality of TROIs having normalized target spectral HU curves that are below the threshold;
identify the upper set of TROIs as a first type of tissue; and
identify the second set of TROIs as a second type of tissue.
10. A method comprising:
accessing an image dataset comprising spectral computed tomography (CT) data acquired from a patient;
creating a plurality of target regions of interest (TROIs) in the patient from the image dataset via selection of anatomical locations or features;
extracting a target dataset from the image dataset, the target dataset comprising image data corresponding to the TROIs;
computing a plurality of target spectral curves from the target dataset, each target spectral curve representing x-ray attenuation for a respective TROI;
creating a reference region of interest (RROI) in the patient from the image dataset via selection of an anatomical location or feature;
extracting a reference dataset from the image dataset, the reference dataset comprising image data corresponding to the RROI;
computing a reference spectral curve from the reference dataset;
normalizing the plurality of target spectral curves with the reference spectral curve; and
outputting a visualization of the plurality of normalized target spectral curves.
11. The method ofclaim 10 further comprising extracting a plurality of metrics from the plurality of normalized target spectral curves, each metric corresponding to a respective normalized target spectral curve.
12. The method ofclaim 11 further comprising:
selecting a threshold to distinguish a first type of anatomy from a second type of anatomy; and
applying the threshold to the plurality of metrics.
13. The method ofclaim 12 further comprising defining a confidence interval near the threshold to aid in distinguishing TROIs corresponding to the first type of anatomy from TROIs corresponding to the second type of anatomy.
14. The method ofclaim 10 wherein computing the reference spectral curve and the plurality of target spectral curves comprises calculating Hounsfield Unit data at a plurality of energy levels.
15. The method ofclaim 14 wherein computing the plurality of target spectral curves comprises calculating a mean intensity within each TROI; and
wherein computing the reference spectral curve comprises calculating a mean intensity within the RROI.
16. The method ofclaim 10 wherein identifying the plurality of TROIs comprises identifying abnormal anatomy; and
wherein identifying the RROI comprises identifying normal anatomy.
17. The method ofclaim 10 further comprising:
accessing a pre-computed reference database having stored thereon spectral CT data acquired from a reference population;
identifying at least one reference metric from the pre-computed reference database, the at least one reference metric representing an expected spectral characteristic of the TROIs;
comparing the at least one reference metric to at least one of the plurality of metrics;
calculating a deviation metric based on the comparison; and
outputting a visualization of the deviation metric.
18. The method ofclaim 10 further comprising automatically creating at least one of the TROIs and RROI using an automated computer-based algorithm.
19. A system for analyzing image data comprising:
a database having stored thereon a patient image dataset acquired from a patient, the patient image dataset comprising spectral computed tomography (CT) data;
a processor programmed to:
access the image dataset;
identify a plurality of target regions of interest (TROIs) from the patient image dataset, the plurality of TROIs being at identified anatomical locations or features in the patient;
identify at least one reference region of interest (RROI) from the patient image dataset, the at least on RROI being at one or more identified anatomical locations or features in the patient;
extract spectral CT data for the plurality of TROIs and the RROI from the patient image dataset;
generate a plurality of target curves for the plurality of TROIs from the extracted spectral CT data;
generate at least one reference curve for the at least one RROI from the extracted spectral CT data;
normalize the plurality of target curves with the at least one reference curve; and
output the plurality of normalized target curves; and
a graphical user interface (GUI) configured to display the plurality of normalized target curves to a user.
20. The system ofclaim 19 wherein the processor is further programmed to extract at least one metric from at least one of the plurality of normalized target curves, the at least one metric corresponding to a respective normalized target curve; and
wherein the GUI is further configured to display the at least one metric to the user.
21. The system ofclaim 20 wherein the processor is programmed calculate an average HU value at a plurality of discrete keV levels for the at least one of the plurality of normalized target curves.
22. The system ofclaim 20 wherein the processor is further programmed to apply a threshold to the at least one metric, wherein the threshold distinguishes a first type of anatomy from a second type of anatomy.
23. The system ofclaim 22 wherein the processor is further programmed to define a confidence interval near the threshold to aid in distinguishing TROIs corresponding to the first type of anatomy from TROIs corresponding to the second type of anatomy.
24. The system ofclaim 19 wherein the processor is further programmed to apply a threshold to the plurality of normalized target curves; and
wherein the GUI is further configured to display the threshold plurality of normalized target curves to the user.
25. The system ofclaim 19 further comprising a reference database having stored thereon comparison spectral CT data acquired from a reference population, the comparison spectral CT data representing known spectral CT behavior for at least one type of healthy tissue; and
wherein the processor is further programmed to:
access the comparison spectral CT data;
compare the spectral CT data for the plurality of TROIs with the comparison spectral CT data;
generate a plurality of deviation metrics based on the comparison, the plurality of deviation metrics representing deviation of respective TROIs with respect to the comparison spectral CT data; and
output a visualization of the plurality of deviation metrics for the TROIs.
26. The system ofclaim 25 wherein the GUI is further configured to:
display the plurality of TROIs on a common image; and
color-code the plurality of TROIs based on plurality of deviation metrics.
US12/941,1622010-11-082010-11-08System and method for analyzing and visualizing spectral CT dataActive2033-04-24US8761479B2 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application NumberPriority DateFiling DateTitle
US12/941,162US8761479B2 (en)2010-11-082010-11-08System and method for analyzing and visualizing spectral CT data
FR1060957AFR2967283B1 (en)2010-11-082010-12-21 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ANALYZING AND VISUALIZING SPECTRAL TDM DATA
CN2010106236842ACN102462504A (en)2010-11-082010-12-27System and method for analyzing and visualizing spectral CT data

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application NumberPriority DateFiling DateTitle
US12/941,162US8761479B2 (en)2010-11-082010-11-08System and method for analyzing and visualizing spectral CT data

Publications (2)

Publication NumberPublication Date
US20120114206A1 US20120114206A1 (en)2012-05-10
US8761479B2true US8761479B2 (en)2014-06-24

Family

ID=45990484

Family Applications (1)

Application NumberTitlePriority DateFiling Date
US12/941,162Active2033-04-24US8761479B2 (en)2010-11-082010-11-08System and method for analyzing and visualizing spectral CT data

Country Status (3)

CountryLink
US (1)US8761479B2 (en)
CN (1)CN102462504A (en)
FR (1)FR2967283B1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
US20140321603A1 (en)*2012-08-302014-10-30Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaX-ray ct apparatus, image processing apparatus, and image processing method
US20200311912A1 (en)*2019-03-292020-10-01GE Precision Healthcare LLCSystems and methods to facilitate review of liver tumor cases
US10818045B2 (en)2016-10-312020-10-27Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Medical imaging apparatus and method of processing medical image

Families Citing this family (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
US8761479B2 (en)*2010-11-082014-06-24General Electric CompanySystem and method for analyzing and visualizing spectral CT data
US8712137B2 (en)*2012-05-292014-04-29General Electric CompanyMethods and system for displaying segmented images
CN105144241B (en)*2013-04-102020-09-01皇家飞利浦有限公司Image quality index and/or imaging parameter recommendation based thereon
DE102013206415A1 (en)*2013-04-112014-10-16Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Automatic extraction of optimized output data
JP6245237B2 (en)*2015-09-042017-12-13キヤノンマーケティングジャパン株式会社 Medical image processing apparatus, program mountable in medical image processing apparatus, and medical image processing method
US11024028B2 (en)*2016-10-252021-06-01Koninklijke Philips N.V.Device and method for quality assessment of medical image datasets
CN106821410B (en)*2017-03-202020-01-07厦门大学Substance identification method and system adopting hyperspectral CT functional imaging
EP3605448A1 (en)2018-08-012020-02-05Koninklijke Philips N.V.Method for providing automatic adaptive energy setting for ct virtual monochromatic imaging
KR102628041B1 (en)2018-11-232024-01-22삼성전자주식회사Apparatus, method, and computer program product for processing tomography image
US12411958B2 (en)*2023-04-112025-09-09Dell Products L.P.Early and adaptive stream sampling system and method for machine learning-based optimizations in storage systems
CN117496274B (en)*2023-12-292024-06-11墨卓生物科技(浙江)有限公司Classification counting method, system and storage medium based on liquid drop images

Citations (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
US20020109839A1 (en)*2001-02-122002-08-15Faus Robert J.System and method for self-referencing calibration
US20070041490A1 (en)*2005-08-172007-02-22General Electric CompanyDual energy scanning protocols for motion mitigation and material differentiation
US20070263915A1 (en)*2006-01-102007-11-15Adi MashiachSystem and method for segmenting structures in a series of images
US20080260094A1 (en)*2005-10-282008-10-23Koninklijke Philips Electronics N. V.Method and Apparatus for Spectral Computed Tomography
US20090074150A1 (en)*2000-02-182009-03-19William Beaumont HospitalCone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager
US20090138279A1 (en)2007-11-232009-05-28General Electric CompanySystems, methods and apparatus for analysis and visualization of metadata information
US20090292551A1 (en)*2008-05-202009-11-26General Electric CompanySystem and Method for Mapping Structural and Functional Deviations in an Anatomical Region
US20090292557A1 (en)2008-05-202009-11-26General Electric CompanySystem and Method for Disease Diagnosis from Patient Structural Deviation Data
US20090292478A1 (en)2008-05-202009-11-26General Electric CompanySystem and Method for Analysis of Multiple Diseases and Severities
US20090290772A1 (en)2008-05-202009-11-26General Electric CompanyMedical Data Processing and Visualization Technique
US7634044B2 (en)*2006-01-202009-12-15Siemens AktiengesellschaftMethod for generating cardiac CT representations with application of a contrast medium, and multi-tube CT system for carrying out this method
US20100069742A1 (en)*2008-09-152010-03-18Varian Medical Systems, Inc.Systems and Methods for Tracking and Targeting Object in a Patient Using Imaging Techniques
US20100131885A1 (en)2008-11-262010-05-27General Electric CompanySystems and Methods for Displaying Multi-Energy Data
US20120001084A1 (en)*2009-03-262012-01-05Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.Spectral imaging
US20120051614A1 (en)*2009-05-052012-03-01Koninklijke Philips Electronics N. V.Automatic assessment of confidence in imaging data
US20120062901A1 (en)*2009-05-222012-03-15Canon Kabushiki KaishaImaging device and imaging method
US20120076377A1 (en)*2010-09-272012-03-29Sandeep DuttaSystem and method for blood vessel stenosis visualization and quantification using spectral ct analysis
US20120114206A1 (en)*2010-11-082012-05-10Gopal Biligeri AvinashSystem and method for analyzing and visualizing spectral ct data
US20120123253A1 (en)*2009-07-172012-05-17Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.Anatomy modeling for tumor region of interest definition
US20120294414A1 (en)*2009-11-032012-11-22Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.Computed tomography apparatus
US20130004043A1 (en)*2011-07-012013-01-03The Regents Of The University Of MichiganPixel and Voxel-Based Analysis of Registered Medical Images for Assessing Bone Integrity

Patent Citations (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
US20090074150A1 (en)*2000-02-182009-03-19William Beaumont HospitalCone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager
US20110228906A1 (en)*2000-02-182011-09-22William Beaumont HospitalCone beam computed tomography with a flat panel imager
US20020109839A1 (en)*2001-02-122002-08-15Faus Robert J.System and method for self-referencing calibration
US20070041490A1 (en)*2005-08-172007-02-22General Electric CompanyDual energy scanning protocols for motion mitigation and material differentiation
US20080260094A1 (en)*2005-10-282008-10-23Koninklijke Philips Electronics N. V.Method and Apparatus for Spectral Computed Tomography
US20070263915A1 (en)*2006-01-102007-11-15Adi MashiachSystem and method for segmenting structures in a series of images
US7634044B2 (en)*2006-01-202009-12-15Siemens AktiengesellschaftMethod for generating cardiac CT representations with application of a contrast medium, and multi-tube CT system for carrying out this method
US20090138279A1 (en)2007-11-232009-05-28General Electric CompanySystems, methods and apparatus for analysis and visualization of metadata information
US20090292478A1 (en)2008-05-202009-11-26General Electric CompanySystem and Method for Analysis of Multiple Diseases and Severities
US20090290772A1 (en)2008-05-202009-11-26General Electric CompanyMedical Data Processing and Visualization Technique
US20090292557A1 (en)2008-05-202009-11-26General Electric CompanySystem and Method for Disease Diagnosis from Patient Structural Deviation Data
US20090292551A1 (en)*2008-05-202009-11-26General Electric CompanySystem and Method for Mapping Structural and Functional Deviations in an Anatomical Region
US20100069742A1 (en)*2008-09-152010-03-18Varian Medical Systems, Inc.Systems and Methods for Tracking and Targeting Object in a Patient Using Imaging Techniques
US20100131885A1 (en)2008-11-262010-05-27General Electric CompanySystems and Methods for Displaying Multi-Energy Data
US20120001084A1 (en)*2009-03-262012-01-05Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.Spectral imaging
US20120051614A1 (en)*2009-05-052012-03-01Koninklijke Philips Electronics N. V.Automatic assessment of confidence in imaging data
US20120062901A1 (en)*2009-05-222012-03-15Canon Kabushiki KaishaImaging device and imaging method
US20120123253A1 (en)*2009-07-172012-05-17Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.Anatomy modeling for tumor region of interest definition
US20120294414A1 (en)*2009-11-032012-11-22Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.Computed tomography apparatus
US20120076377A1 (en)*2010-09-272012-03-29Sandeep DuttaSystem and method for blood vessel stenosis visualization and quantification using spectral ct analysis
US20120114206A1 (en)*2010-11-082012-05-10Gopal Biligeri AvinashSystem and method for analyzing and visualizing spectral ct data
US20130004043A1 (en)*2011-07-012013-01-03The Regents Of The University Of MichiganPixel and Voxel-Based Analysis of Registered Medical Images for Assessing Bone Integrity

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
US20140321603A1 (en)*2012-08-302014-10-30Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaX-ray ct apparatus, image processing apparatus, and image processing method
US9532759B2 (en)*2012-08-302017-01-03Toshiba Medical Systems CorporationX-ray CT apparatus, image processing apparatus, and image processing method
US10818045B2 (en)2016-10-312020-10-27Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Medical imaging apparatus and method of processing medical image
US20200311912A1 (en)*2019-03-292020-10-01GE Precision Healthcare LLCSystems and methods to facilitate review of liver tumor cases
US11030742B2 (en)*2019-03-292021-06-08GE Precision Healthcare LLCSystems and methods to facilitate review of liver tumor cases
US20210295512A1 (en)*2019-03-292021-09-23GE Precision Healthcare LLCSystems and methods to facilitate review of liver tumor cases
US11669964B2 (en)*2019-03-292023-06-06GE Precision Healthcare LLCSystems and methods to facilitate review of liver tumor cases

Also Published As

Publication numberPublication date
CN102462504A (en)2012-05-23
FR2967283B1 (en)2017-03-24
US20120114206A1 (en)2012-05-10
FR2967283A1 (en)2012-05-11

Similar Documents

PublicationPublication DateTitle
US8761479B2 (en)System and method for analyzing and visualizing spectral CT data
US6748044B2 (en)Computer assisted analysis of tomographic mammography data
US7072435B2 (en)Methods and apparatus for anomaly detection
US11373301B2 (en)Image diagnostic device, image processing method, and program for obtaining diagnostic prediction models using deep learning
JP5138910B2 (en) 3D CAD system and method using projected images
US7295691B2 (en)Computer aided diagnosis of an image set
US9498179B1 (en)Methods and systems for metal artifact reduction in spectral CT imaging
US8855385B2 (en)Apparatus and method for multi-energy tissue quantification
EP2433566A2 (en)System and method for blood vessel stenosis visualization and quantification using spectral CT analysis
US10448915B2 (en)System and method for characterizing anatomical features
US8774485B2 (en)Systems and methods for performing segmentation and visualization of multivariate medical images
JP2004105731A (en)Processing of computer aided medical image
US12141979B2 (en)Image data processing to increase follow-up analysis fidelity
US8542893B2 (en)System and method of pulmonary emboli detection for computed tomography
US20250311985A1 (en)X-ray ct apparatus, medical image processing apparatus, and medical image processing method
US20250037326A1 (en)Optimized visualization in medical images based on color overlays
AU2023406290A1 (en)System and method for measuring vessels in a body

Legal Events

DateCodeTitleDescription
ASAssignment

Owner name:GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, NEW YORK

Free format text:ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:AVINASH, GOPAL BILIGERI;DUTTA, SANDEEP;SIROHEY, SAAD AHMED;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20101104 TO 20101108;REEL/FRAME:025320/0303

FEPPFee payment procedure

Free format text:PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

STCFInformation on status: patent grant

Free format text:PATENTED CASE

MAFPMaintenance fee payment

Free format text:PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551)

Year of fee payment:4

MAFPMaintenance fee payment

Free format text:PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment:8

ASAssignment

Owner name:GE PRECISION HEALTHCARE LLC, WISCONSIN

Free format text:NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT;ASSIGNOR:GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:071225/0218

Effective date:20250505


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp