Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


US6282712B1 - Automatic software installation on heterogeneous networked computer systems - Google Patents

Automatic software installation on heterogeneous networked computer systems
Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US6282712B1
US6282712B1US09/397,480US39748099AUS6282712B1US 6282712 B1US6282712 B1US 6282712B1US 39748099 AUS39748099 AUS 39748099AUS 6282712 B1US6282712 B1US 6282712B1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
computer
software
new
data processing
processing system
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US09/397,480
Inventor
Michael L. Davis
Raymond W. McCollum
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC
Original Assignee
Microsoft Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Microsoft CorpfiledCriticalMicrosoft Corp
Priority to US09/397,480priorityCriticalpatent/US6282712B1/en
Assigned to MICROSOFT CORPORATIONreassignmentMICROSOFT CORPORATIONASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS).Assignors: DAVIS, MICHAEL L., MCCOLLUM, RAYMOND W.
Priority to US09/916,866prioritypatent/US7124409B2/en
Application grantedgrantedCritical
Publication of US6282712B1publicationCriticalpatent/US6282712B1/en
Assigned to MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLCreassignmentMICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLCASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS).Assignors: MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Anticipated expirationlegal-statusCritical
Expired - Lifetimelegal-statusCriticalCurrent

Links

Images

Classifications

Definitions

Landscapes

Abstract

The present invention provides for automatically installing software on heterogeneous computer systems. In a distributed system having heterogeneous computer systems having dissimilar hardware or software components or dissimilar configuration information, such as different natural languages, different operating system types, different network operating system types, and different processor types, the present invention automatically installs the appropriate edition of software on computers. The present invention installs an edition of software appropriate for use with a specific operating system type, appropriate for execution on a particular processor type and in a particular natural language by utilizing commands specific to an operating system and network operating system type. The present invention automatically installs software in response to user input, the addition of a new computer to the distributed system, or upon the availability of a new version of the software.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
This application is a divisional of pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/403,244, filed Mar. 10, 1995.
TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates generally to data processing systems and, more particularly, to the automatic installation of software on heterogeneous computer systems.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Typically, large, multinational corporations have a distributed system containing many computers spread across a wide geographical area that are networked together. This type of environment makes it difficult and costly to manage the computers in terms of providing software installation, support and maintenance. That is, an administrator of the distributed system has to visit each computer in order to manage the computers. Thus, a significant cost of managing the computers in this type of environment stems from software installation, support, and maintenance. In fact, the initial purchase price of software may be only a small portion of the total cost associated with managing the computers.
The distributed systems of large corporations usually comprise computers that have dissimilar hardware and software components. The lack of uniformity in components is the product of different organizations within the corporation having different needs for their computers. For instance, one organization may consist primarily of clerical workers, who utilize various programs such as word processing programs or spreadsheet programs, that do not require significant processing power, whereas another organization in the corporation that performs engineering research utilize more computationally intensive programs that require significantly more processing power. Therefore, a large corporation usually has computers with different types of processors.
With respect to different software components, the distributed systems of large corporations usually contain groups of computers that are interconnected via a local area network (LAN). Each group of computers typically represents an organization within the corporation. Each group of computers contains one or more server computers that runs a network operating system. A “network operating system” provides network services to other computers (“client computers”) on the LAN, such as remote file access as well as remote printing capabilities. In many instances, different groups may have servers running different network operating systems.
The client computers within a group of computers are typically used by end users. End users often have preferences regarding what operating system runs on their computer Therefore, in a distributed system of a large corporation having many end users, there are usually a number of computers with different operating systems.
Just as end users have a preference for a particular operating system, end users typically have a preference for a natural language in which communications between the end user and the computer are to take place. In a distributed system of a large, multinational corporation, it is common to have computers that employ different natural languages for communications with end users.
Systems have been developed that, upon user initiation, install software from a master computer to a slave computer, where both the master and the slave are homogeneous with respect to each other in that they have similar hardware and software components. However, these systems typically do not operate within a distributed system of computers that have dissimilar hardware and software components, such as is commonly found with large corporations. Therefore, although systems have been developed to facilitate the installation of software on homogenous computers, these systems do not suit the needs of a large corporation. Thus, large corporations and other organizations having a distributed system of heterogeneous computers are in need of a mechanism to facilitate the installation of software within their distributed system.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The system described herein provides for automatically installing software on heterogeneous networked computer systems. In a distributed system having heterogeneous computer systems of different natural languages, different operating system types, different network operating system types, or different processor types, the system described herein automatically installs the appropriate edition of software on computers. The system described herein installs an edition of software appropriate for execution on a particular processor type, suitable for use with a particular operating system and in a particular natural language by the system utilizing commands specific to an operating system and network operating system type. The system described herein automatically installs software in response to user input, the addition of a new computer to the distributed system, or upon the availability of a new version of the software.
In accordance with a first aspect of the present invention, a method is provided for automatically installing software in a distributed system having a first computer and a second computer. The first computer includes an installation component and the second computer is heterogeneous with respect to the first computer. The installation component automatically determines when to install the software on the second computer and when it is determined to install the software, the installation component installs the software on the second computer.
A second aspect of the present invention discloses an automatic software installation system. The automatic software installation system has a first computer and a second computer. The first computer has an associated natural language and a processor running an operating system. The second computer has a first component for storing editions of software, a second component for determining the natural language of the first computer, the operating system of the first computer and the processor of the first computer, and a third component for installing an edition of the software onto the first computer that is suitable for execution on the processor of the first computer and that utilizes the natural language of the first computer, wherein the second computer installs the edition of the software by utilizing commands that are suitable for the operating system of the first computer.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 depicts a distributed system suitable for practicing a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 2 depicts a more detailed diagram of the central site of FIG.1.
FIG. 3 A depicts a more detailed block diagram of a site server of FIG.2.
FIG. 3B depicts a more detailed block diagram of a client server of FIG.2.
FIG. 4 depicts a flowchart of the steps performed by the preferred embodiment of the present invention when moving or copying a service to a helper server.
FIG. 5 depicts a flowchart of the steps performed by the preferred embodiment of the present invention when a new or revised version of a service on a client server becomes available.
FIG. 6 depicts a flowchart of the steps performed by the preferred embodiment of the present invention when monitoring client servers.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
A preferred embodiment of the present invention automatically installs software in a heterogeneous environment. A “heterogeneous environment” refers to a grouping of computers usually connected via a network, where some of the computers have dissimilar hardware or software components or dissimilar configuration information, including different types of operating systems, different types of network operating systems, different natural languages, or different types of processors. By automatically installing software in a heterogeneous environment, the preferred embodiment facilitates the maintenance of computers in a heterogeneous environment and reduces the cost associated therewith. Two computers are said to be “heterogeneous” with respect to each other if they have dissimilar hardware or software components or dissimilar configuration information. For example, two computers are considered heterogeneous if they access network services through different network operating systems or if they have different operating systems, natural languages or processors.
The preferred embodiment of the present invention operates within the context of a centralized management system for distributed systems, such as the Systems Management Server available from Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Washington, although one skilled in the art will appreciate that other embodiments of the present invention can operate in other types of systems. The centralized management system provides hardware and software inventory support, software distribution and installation, software updates, and remote diagnostics. In providing hardware and software inventory support, the centralized management system provides a listing of the hardware and software components on the computers in the distributed system. In providing software distribution and installation, the centralized management system centralizes the distribution and installation of application programs on file servers or clients of the file servers. The software update functionality performed by the centralized management system installs new software versions when the current version of the software becomes outdated. The installation of the new version of software is performed on each computer that needs the new version. A “version” of software refers to the release of the software, which is typically indicated by a number, such as 1.0. In providing the remote diagnostics functionality, the centralized management system allows an administrator of the distributed system to take control of the input devices and the display of a remote computer so as to be able to diagnose problems with the computer.
As previously stated, the preferred embodiment operates in a heterogeneous environment. The computers that operate in this type of environment can have different natural languages, network operating systems, operating systems, or processors. With respect to natural languages, for purposes of explaining the preferred embodiment, an illustrative case is described below using English and German, although the present invention can be used with other natural languages. As to the different network operating systems, the preferred embodiment supports the “MICROSOFT WMDOWS NT” network operating system available from Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Washington, the “LAN MANAGER” network operating system also available from Microsoft Corporation and the “LAN SERVER” network operating system available from the International Business Machines Corporation of Armonk, N.Y. The operating systems supported by the preferred embodiment include “MICROSOFT WINDOWS NT,”Microsoft Operating System 2 available from Microsoft Corporation and IBM “OS/2” available from the IBM Corporation. “MICROSOFT WINDOWS NT” operates as both a network operating system by providing access to remote resources such as printers and files, as well as a local operating system by providing access to local resources. The processors supported by the preferred embodiment include the X86 family of processors available from the Intel Corporation of Cupertino, California, the MIPS R4000 family of processors available from MIPS Technologies of Mountain View, California and the Alpha family of processors available from the Digital Equipment Corporation of Maynard, Mass. The various combinations of network operating systems, operating systems and processors supported by the preferred embodiment are depicted below in Table 1.
TABLE 1
NetworkWindows NTLAN ManagerSAN Server
Operating System
Operating SystemWindows NTMS OS/2IBM OS/2
ProcessorIntel X86Intel X86Intel X86
DEC Alpha
MIPS R4000
As can be seen from the above table, the preferred embodiment supports a computer running “MICROSOFT WINDOWS NT” on the X86, Alpha or MIPS families of processors. Also, the preferred embodiment supports a computer running “LAN MANAGER” and MS OS/2 on the Intel X86 family of processors and a computer running “LAIN SERVER” and IBM OS/2 on the Intel X86 family of processors. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention can be used with other network operating systems, operating systems and processors or additional combinations thereof.
The centralized management system in which the preferred embodiment operates is used to control a distributed system having many sites, where each site has a local area network connecting a number of computers. One of these sites acts as the central site for managing all of the other sites. The other sites consist of primary sites and secondary sites and may be ordered hierarchically with the primary sites being responsible for managing the secondary sites. A block diagram of the distributed system in which the preferred embodiment operates is depicted in FIG.1. The distributed system100 contains acentral site102, two primary sites104,106 and two secondary sites108,110 with each site connected tocommunication mechanism112, such as a wide area network. Thecentral site102 manages all other sites and therefore stores system-wide information. The primary sites104,106 typically manage one or more secondary sites108,110. For example, the primary site104 may manage secondary site108 and the primary site106 may managesecondary site I10. As previously stated, the sites are arranged hierarchically with the central site at the top of the hierarchy managing all other sites and the primary sites are next in the hierarchy managing the secondary sites.
A more detailed block diagram of the central site of FIG. 1 is depicted in FIG.2. Thecentral site102 is connected to one or more primary sites via thecommunication mechanism112. The central site200 contains asite server202, an SQL server206, a helper server208, and a domain204. Thesite server202 of thecentral site102 acts as the centralized management system for the central site and all other sites. An administrator's console210 is connected to thesite server202 so that the administrator can centrally manage the distributed system. In addition, thesite server202 stores software that can be installed on other computers in the distributed system. The SQL server206 manages a database that contains various inventory information and status information regarding the distributed system. The helper server208 is used to offload some of the burden of managing the distributed system from thesite server202. The domain204 is a grouping of computers and contains twoclient servers212 and216, which are connected to client computers214,218, and220. Theclient servers212 and216 act as file servers for the client computers214,218, and220, which are, in turn, used by end users. Although the central site has been described as having various components, one skilled in the art will appreciate that the central site can contain additional or different components such as additional helper servers, additional domains, additional client servers within a domain, and additional clients for each client server.
Primary and secondary sites are configured like the central site except that the secondary sites do not contain SQL servers. Therefore, both primary sites and secondary sites usually contain a site server, one or more helper servers, as well as one or more domains and the primary sites additionally contain an SQL server. Each domain may contain one or more client servers connected to one or more clients. The site server for a primary site is used for managing the primary site in which it is located as well as all secondary sites that are lower in the hierarchy. However, the site server of the central site acts as the centralized management mechanism of the entire distributed system, thereby managing all sites.
FIG. 3A depicts a more detailed block diagram of thesite server202 of FIG.2. Thesite server202 contains a central processing unit (CPU)302, a memory304, a secondary storage device306, such as a hard disk, and an input device308, such as a keyboard. Although thesite server202 is described with respect to having specific components, one skilled in the art will appreciate that the site server may have additional or different components. For example, thesite server202 can utilize a CPU such as an X86, MIPS, or Alpha CPU. The memory304 contains a copy of “MICROSOFT WINDOWS NT”310, a number of services312,314,318,320,322 that provide the functionality of the centralized management system, and a site configuration manager316 that performs the functionality of the preferred embodiment of the present invention, as will be further described below. Additionally, the site configuration manager performs processing associated with client computers as described in copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/403,246, filed Mar. 10, 1995 now U.S. Pat. No. 5,742,829, entitled “Automatic Software Installation on Networked Client Computer Systems,” which is hereby incorporated by reference. “MICROSOFT WINDOWS NT”310 acts as both a network operating system and a local operating system to the site server. A “service” is a computer program that typically runs as a background task and performs a system function, such as a function related to the centralized management system described herein. The services that provide the functionality of the centralized management system include the scheduler312, the despooler314, the inventory processor318, the inventory data loader320, and the sender services322. The scheduler312 is responsible for scheduling jobs such as software updates to occur across the distributed system and when the time has arrived for the job to be performed, the despooler314 is responsible for performing the job by distributing the software to one or more computers within the site. The inventory processor318 is responsible for receiving inventory information from the computers within a domain and passing the data to the inventory data loader320. The inventory data loader320 is responsible for receiving the data, correlating the data, and storing the data into a database on the SQL server. The sender services322 are responsible for performing site-to-site communications. The sender services, therefore, provide communication over various connections such as ISDN or X.25. It should be noted that only one instance of the scheduler312, the despooler314, the inventory processor318, and the inventory data loader320 are present within the site at any given time. However, more than one sender services322 may be present within a site since the site may, in turn, be connected to other sites.
The secondary storage306 contains a system map file324 and a software directory structure326. The system map file324 lists the software that is stored on thesite server202 and the directories in which the software is stored. In addition, the system map file324 indicates the specific edition of the software. An “edition” of software refers to a copy of the software that operates using a particular natural language and that is suitable for execution with a particular type of operating system on a particular type of processor. For example, an application program may have two editions, a first edition in German for use with OS/2 on an x86 processor and a second edition in English for use with “MICROSOFT WINDOWS NT” on an Alpha processor. More than one edition of the software is typically stored on the site server according to the natural language in which it is to operate, the operating system with which it is to operate and the platform (or processor) on which it is to execute. The various editions of the software are stored in the software directory structure326. The software directory structure326 is created upon installation of the centralized management system. When installing the centralized management system, a compact disk is inserted into the site server and as part of the installation process, the software directory structure326 is created and the software contained on the compact disk is copied therein. The software directory structure326 has a main directory “site.srv” with various directories of the main directory that each contain portions of an edition of the software that are natural language independent. That is, software usually comprises a number of files (“portions”), some of which are natural language independent and others are natural language dependent. The natural language independent portions are stored in the directories and the natural language dependent portions are stored in subdirectories within the directories. An example of a service stored in the software directory structure226 is depicted below in Table 2.
TABLE 2
..\site.srv
\x86.bin
servos2.exe
servnt.exe
serv.dll
\00000409
servlang.dll
\00000407
servlang.dll
\mips.bin
servnt.exe
serv.dll
\00000409
servlang.dll
\00000407
servlang.dll
\alpha.bin
servnt.exe
serv.dll
\00000409
servlang.dll
\00000407
servlang.dll
As can be seen from Table 2, the main directory site.srv has three directories \x86, \mips, and \alpha. Each directory contains software that is specific to a particular type of processor and within each directory are editions of the software for a particular operating system, such as “servos2.exe” for use with “OS/2” and “servnt.exe” for use with “MICROSOFT WINDOWS NT.” Each directory then, in turn, has a subdirectory 00000409 and a subdirectory 00000407. Each of these numbers indicates a specific language code that refers to a natural language. For example, the number 00000407 indicates the German language and the number 00000409 indicates the English language. These subdirectories contain one or more portions of the edition of the software that are language dependent. Therefore, within the \x86 directory, servos2.exe, servnt.exe and serv.dll are language independent portions of the software that are suitable for execution on the X86 family of processors, with servos2.exe suitable for use with “OS/2” and servnt.exe suitable for use with “MICROSOFT WINDOWS NT.” Further, subdirectories 00000409 and 00000407 of the \x86 directory contain the language dependent portions of the software that are suitable for execution on the X86 family of processors. Although the software for one service has been depicted, all of the other software that is available from the site server is stored in this manner. For example, with respect to an additional service, the \x86 directory would contain the language independent portions of the additional service that run on the X86 family of computers (with one edition for each operating system supported), and the subdirectories 00000409 and 00000407 would contain the language dependent portions of the additional service.
The configuration of the helper server is similar to that of the site server. That is, the helper server has similar hardware and software components to that of the site server, although one skilled in the art will appreciate that the helper server can have additional or different hardware or software components. However, the services used by the centralized management system do not typically run on the helper server unless they are specifically moved on to the helper server as is discussed below.
FIG. 3B depicts a more detailed block diagram of theclient server216 of FIG.2. Althoughclient server216 is depicted, the other client server212 is similarly configured. Theclient server216 has an80386 processor, a memory334, a secondary storage device336, and an input device338, such as a keyboard. The memory334 contains a network operating system such as “LAN MANAGER”344 and an operating system such as IBM “OS/2”346. It should be appreciated that theclient server216 can operate other combinations of network operating systems and operating systems. In addition, the memory334 contains services that help provide the functionality of the centralized management system including the package command manager340 and the inventory agent342. The package command manager340 provides the functionality of automatically installing application programs onto theclient server216. The inventory agent342 provides the functionality of retrieving the hardware and software inventory of theclient server216 and sending this inventory information to the site server wherein the information is utilized by the inventory processor of the site server. The secondary storage device336 contains a software directory structure350 that stores the software that is associated with the centralized management system and that is currently installed on theclient server216. The layout of the software directory structure350 is similar to that of the software directory structure described relative to the site server. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the client server may have additional or different components, such as a MIPS processor, an Alpha processor or a processor from the X86 family of processors.
As previously stated, the preferred embodiment of the present invention provides for the automatic installation of software on a heterogeneous computer. The preferred embodiment of the present invention performs this functionality within the context of the centralized management system described above. However, one skilled in the art will appreciate that the techniques used by the preferred embodiment of the present invention for automatically installing software can be utilized within other environments. The preferred embodiment of the present invention can be used to copy or move the services of the centralized management system located on the site server to a helper server in order to offload some of the processing of the site server. In addition, the preferred embodiment of the present invention monitors and automatically installs the services of the centralized management system on client servers.
FIG. 4 depicts a flowchart of the steps performed by the preferred embodiment of the present invention when copying or moving services from the site server to a helper server. As previously stated, the administrator of the distributed system may determine to move a service or copy a service from the site server to a helper server in order to increase the performance of the site server. Also, once a service is on a helper server, the administrator may choose to move the service to a different helper server. In the preferred embodiment, the steps described below are performed by the site configuration manager. The first step performed by the site configuration manager is to receive data that indicates which service is to be moved or copied and the destination helper server (step402). In this step, the administrator inputs the data into the administrator's console, which then sends the data to the site server. At the site server, the data is deposited into the database of the SQL server, wherein a change in the database is noticed by the system and the data is then sent to the site configuration manager for processing. The data received by the site configuration manager does not provide an indication of where the service is currently located. Therefore, the location of the service has to be determined in a later step. In other words, the service could be currently running on another helper server and an administrator may have decided to move the service from one helper server to another.
After receiving the data, the site configuration manager determines whether the requested action to be performed on the service is a move (step404). If the service to be acted upon is the scheduler, the despooler, the inventory processor, or the inventory data loader, then it is assumed that a move is to occur since only one instance of these services can be running in the site at any given time. However, if the service to be acted upon is the sender services, it is assumed that the service is to be copied since more than one sender services can be running in the site at any given time. If it is determined that a move is to occur, the site configuration manager determines the location of the service, stops the service, and deinstalls the service (step406) so that the service can be moved. In this step, the site configuration manager determines the server (“source server”) on which the service is currently located and the type of network operating system running on the source server by querying the NT registry.
The NT registry is a central repository in “MICROSOFT WINDOWS NT” for all information about the computer hardware, the computer software, and the users of the distributed system. The NT registry consists of a number of files, where each file corresponds to a discrete unit of registry information. Data in the registry is structured as a hierarchically structured tree, with each node of the tree referred to as a key. Each key can contain both subkeys and data. When accessing the data of a key, in some instances, the key can be referred to directly to access the data and, in other instances, a key must be opened before accessing the data associated with the key. When opening a key, the handle of another key must be supplied in the registry that is already open. The NT registry provides four standard handles that are always open and, thus, act as entry points to the registry. The first standard handle is HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT which provides information relating to classes of documents and properties associated therewith. The HKEY_CURRENT_USER standard handle contains environment variables that contain preferences of the user relating to the system environment such as the natural language. The HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE standard handle contains configuration information of the system, including information about the bus type, system memory, operating system, processor, natural language and installed software. The HKEY_USERS standard handle contains configuration information of the local computer and user configuration information for the current user. The NT registry on the site server is used by the centralized management system to hold configuration information that indicates where a service is installed and a query to the NT registry can determine the source server and the type of network operating system that is running on the source server. Both of these queries are performed by the site configuration manager in this step.
After determining the type of the network operating system run on the source server, the site configuration manager stops the service and deinstalls the service using commands specific to the network operating system. If the server is running “MICROSOFT WINDOWS NT,” the site configuration manager invokes the service control manager with various calls to perform this functionality. The service control manager maintains a database of installed services and status information pertaining to each service. Thus, the service control manager can control services on a particular computer. In addition, the service control manager automatically starts some services at operating system startup time. In utilizing the service control manager to stop and deinstall the service, the site configuration manager invokes the OpenSCManager call to gain access to the service control manager, the OpenService call to receive a handle to the service, the ControlService call to stop the service, the DeleteService call to deinstall the service and the CloseServiceHandle to close the service control manager. If the server is running either the “LAN MANAGER” or the “LAN SERVER” network operating system, the site configuration manager issues a NetServiceControl command, which provides access to the service on the source server to stop the service and then deinstalls the service. In deinstalling the service, the site configuration manager edits the “lanman.ini” file that is located on the source server to delete the entry referring to the service name and its location if the server is running the “LAN MANAGER” network operating system. The lanman.ini file contains various configuration information, such as a list of services that are currently installed. If the server is running the “LAN SERVER” network operating system, the site configuration manager edits the “ibmlan.ini” file that is located on the source server to delete the entry referring to the service name and its location. The ibmlan.ini file serves a similar purpose to that of the lanman.ini file.
If it is determined that a copy is to occur or after deinstalling the service, the site configuration manager determines the natural language, the type of the operating system and the type of the processor of the destination helper server (step408). To determine the natural language utilized by the destination helper server, the site configuration manager queries the NT registry of the source server. The NT registry contains a key that indicates the natural language. This key is located at HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\NLS\Language\Default. The NT registry calls used to gain access to this key include RegConnectRegistry to establish a connection to a standard key on another computer, RegOpenKeyEx to open the key, RegQueryValueEx to retrieve the data of the key and RegCloseKey to close the key. The site configuration manager determines the type of the operating system running on the destination helper server by invoking the NetServerGetInfo “MICROSOFT WINDOWS NT” call, which returns information about a remote computer and therefore can return an indication of whether the destination helper server is running either “OS/2” or “MICROSOFT WINDOWS NT.” In order to determine the type of processor of the destination helper server, the site configuration manager utilizes a CPU identifier that is found in a key of the NT registry at HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE \Hardware\Description\System\CentralProcessor\0\Identifier. In order to gain access to the CPU identifier, the site configuration manager invokes the following calls: RegConnectRegistry, RegOpenKeyEx, RegQueryValueEx, and RegCloseKey. After receiving the CPU identifier from the NT registry, the site configuration manager accesses tables contained within the system map file to map the CPU identifier to one of the supported processor types.
After determining the natural language, the operating system and the processor of the destination helper server, the site configuration manager determines if there is an edition of the service matching this natural language, operating system type and processor type (step410). This step is performed by checking the system map file which, as previously stated, contains a list of all of the software that is available on the site server and the editions of the software that are available in terms of the processor on which the software can execute, the operating system with which the software can execute and the natural language in which it can operate. If it is determined that there is not an edition of the service matching the natural language, the operating system and the processor of the destination helper server, the site configuration manager will post an event to an event log (step418), and processing ends. The event log is maintained by the site server and is accessible by the administrator. Thus, when an event is posted in the event log, the administrator is notified.
If there is a matching service, the site configuration manager creates the directory structure on the helper server and copies the files to the destination helper server (step412). In this step, the site configuration manager creates a directory structure similar to that as described with reference to the site server except that the main directory is named “helper.srv.” Therefore, for example, if an edition of the scheduler were moved to the destination helper server that was suitable for use with “OS/2” and suitable for execution on the X86 family of processors, a directory of x86.bin would be created and if the natural language were German, a subdirectory within the x86.bin directory would be created and named 00000407. Further, in copying the edition of the scheduler for the X86 family of processors, the language independent portions of the edition of the scheduler that are appropriate for use with “OS/2” would be copied into the x86.bin directory and the language dependent portions of the edition of the software would be copied to the German subdirectory. After creating the directory structure and copying the files, the site configuration manager installs the service on the destination helper server (step414). If the destination helper server is running the “MICROSOFT WINDOWS NT” network operating system, the site configuration manager invokes the following calls to the service control manager to install the service: OpenSCManager to gain access to the service control manager, CreateService to add the service to the database of installed services, and CloseServiceHandle to close the service control manager. If the destination helper server is running the “LAN MANAGER” network operating system, the site configuration manager edits the lanman.ini file and adds an entry under the services section of the file in the form “service name =path-to-exe.” If the destination helper server is running the “LAN SERVER” network operating system, the site configuration manager adds an entry into the services section of the ibmlan.ini file of the same form. After installing the service, the site configuration manager starts the service (step416). In this step, the site configuration manager launches the service to run as a background task on the destination helper server. If the destination helper server is running the “MICROSOFT WIDOWS NT” network operating system, the site configuration manager invokes the following calls to the service control manager: OpenSCManager, OpenService, StartService to launch the service and CloseServiceHandle. If the destination helper server is running either the “LAN MANAGER” or the “LAN SERVER” network operating system, the site configuration manager invokes the NetServiceInstall command to launch the service.
With respect to the services running on the client server, the preferred embodiment of the present invention provides functionality that performs software upgrades to services that are installed, as well as provides functionality that monitors the services. The monitoring performed by the preferred embodiment of the present invention detects if a service stops running and will restart the service if necessary. In addition, the monitoring performed by the preferred embodiment detects a new client server that has been added to the distributed system and automatically installs the appropriate services onto the new client server. The services that are installed on the new client server are installed according to the preferences of the administrator. That is, the administrator has given preferences as to which services should be installed on the client servers of a particular domain, and the preferred embodiment of the present invention installs the services according to the preferences of the administrator. Therefore, the administrator can choose to have either the package command manager or the inventory agent installed or both.
FIG. 5 depicts a flowchart of the steps performed by the preferred embodiment of the present invention when performing a service upgrade. This processing is invoked when a new version of a service is available or when a revised version of a service is available, which typically occurs when a bug fix occurs. In the preferred embodiment, the steps described below are performed by the site configuration manager. The first step performed by the site configuration manager in upgrading a service on the client servers is to determine the client servers which need updating (step502). In this step, the site configuration manager has stored locally a list of all client servers within a particular domain, as well as a list of each service that is installed on each client server. The list of client servers is stored as part of the processing associated with step602 of FIG. 6, where the site configuration manager invokes the NetServerEnum call of “MICROSOFT WINDOWS NT” to retrieve the list of client servers. The services on each client server is known by the site configuration manager, since it is the site configuration manager that is responsible for installing the services.
Both the list of client servers as well a the list of services on each client is stored in the NT registry at key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\SMS. After determining which client servers have services that need updating, the site configuration manager stops the services on these client servers and deinstalls the services (step504).
The processing of this step is similar to that as described relative to step406 of FIG. 4 with reference to the stopping of a service and the deinstallation of a service. After stopping and deinstalling the service, the site configuration manager copies the files representing the updated software to the client servers (step506). In this step, the files are copied from the directory structure of the site server to the directory structure of the client servers. Since the directory structures were already in existence on the client servers, no modification or changes to the directory structures need to occur. After copying the files, the site configuration manager installs the services (step508). The installation of the services is performed similar to that as described relative to step414 of FIG.4. After installing the services, the site configuration manager starts the services on the client servers (step510). The processing performed for this step is similar to that as described relative to step416 of FIG.4.
FIG. 6 depicts a flowchart of the steps performed by the preferred embodiment of the present invention for monitoring client servers. In the preferred embodiment, the steps below are performed by the site configuration manager. In monitoring the client servers, the site configuration manager determines whether a service has terminated execution on the client servers and, if so, the site configuration manager restarts the service. In addition, the site configuration manager determines if a new client server has been added to the site and, upon determining that a new client server has been added to the site, the site configuration manager automatically installs the appropriate services onto the new client server according to the preferences of the administrator. The first step performed by the site configuration manager in monitoring the client servers is to enumerate all servers for one or more domains that the site server is managing (step602). In this step, the site configuration manager invokes the “NetServerEnum” call of “MICROSOFT WINDOWS NT.” After enumerating the client servers, the site configuration manager determines if a new client server has been added to the site (step604). In this step, the site configuration manager compares the list of client servers retrieved in step602 against the list of client servers stored in the NT registry at key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\SMS, which contains a list of client servers that was current as of the last time that step602 was invoked. If it is determined that a new client server has not been added to the site, the site configuration manager queries each service on each client server to determine if it is running (step606). In this step, the site configuration manager determines if a service is running on a client server that utilizes “MICROSOFT WINDOWS NT” by utilizing the service control manager with the following calls: OpenSCManager, OpenService, QueryServiceStatus to return the current status of the service, and CloseServiceHandle. The site configuration manager determines if a service is running on a client server that utilizes either the “LAN MANAGER” or the “LAN SERVER” network operating system by invoking the NetServiceGetInfo call. After querying each service, if a service is found to not be running, the site configuration manager starts the service (step608). The site configuration manager starts the service as previously described relative to step416 of FIG.4. Processing then continues to step624.
If a new client server is detected, the site configuration manager determines the natural language, the operating system type, and the processor type of the new client server (step610). The processing of this step is similar to that as described relative to step408 of FIG.4. After making this determination, the site configuration manager adds the new client server to the list of client servers in the NT registry (step612). As previously described, a list of client servers is stored in the NT registry and in this step, the site configuration manager adds the new client server to the list of client servers in the NT registry. After adding the new client server to the NT registry, the site configuration manager determines the administrator's preferences for services to be installed on the client server (step614). The preferences of the administrator are stored in the system map file. After determining the administrator's preferences, the site configuration manager adds the preferred services of the administrator to the registry for the new client server (step616). As previously described, the NT registry contains a list of services for each client server. In this step, the site configuration manager adds the preferred services of the administrator to a list of services for the new client server that is stored in the NT registry. After adding the services to the NT registry, the site configuration manager determines if there are editions of services available for the natural language, the type of operating system and the type of processor of the new client server (step618). In this step, the site configuration manager accesses the system map file, which has an indication of all the editions of software on the site server. If there is an edition of the services available, the site configuration manager creates a directory structure on the client server, copies the files to the client server, installs the services and starts the services (step622). The processing of this step is similar to that as described relative to steps412-416 of FIG.4. If there are no editions of the services that match the natural language, operating system type and processor type of the new client server, the site configuration manager logs an event in the event log (step620). The processing of this step is similar to that described relative to step418 of FIG.4. Next, the site configuration manager waits for a predetermined amount of time (step624) and continues processing to step602. The predetermined amount of time is configurable by the administrator to various settings. The settings utilized by the preferred embodiment include 24 minutes, 2 hours, 6 hours, and 12 hours. Therefore, the administrator has the ability to set the predetermined amount of time so as to least interrupt the processing of the centralized management system, or when significant problems are occurring, the administrator can set the predetermined period of time so that monitoring of the client servers occurs more frequently.
While the present invention has been described with reference to a preferred embodiment thereof, those skilled in the art will know of various changes in form that may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the claimed invention as defined in the appended claims.

Claims (14)

What is claimed is:
1. In a data processing system having software and a plurality of computers, wherein the data processing system is managed by an administrator, the software having editions that are particular to a natural language, a type of processor and a type of operating system, a method for monitoring the computers of a data processing system and automatically configuring a new computer to operate in the data processing system, comprising computer-implemented steps of:
determining when a new computer is added to the data processing system by comparing a stored list of the plurality of computers against a current list of the plurality of computers of the data processing system, the new computer has an associated natural language, executes a functioning operating system and has a processor;
determining what software is to be automatically installed on the new computer based on the preferences of the administrator;
determining the natural language associated with the new computer, a type of the operating system executing on the new computer a type of the processor in the new computer;
selecting an edition of the software particular to the natural language, the type of the operating system and the type of the processor; and
automatically installing the selected edition of the software onto the new computer utilizing commands suitable for the type of the operating system of the new computer, resulting in the new computer having the software defined by the administrator based upon the particular location of the new computer within the data processing system.
2. The method of claim1 wherein the step of installing the selected edition includes the step of starting the selected edition of the software.
3. The method of claim1 wherein the data processing system has a centralized management system for managing the computers, and wherein the software installed on the new computer is a service of the centralized management system for managing the computers.
4. The method of claim1 wherein a plurality of computer programs execute on each computer, wherein the data processing system has a registry containing entries indicating the computers in the data processing system and entries indicating the computer programs executing on each computer, wherein the method further includes the steps of:
accessing the registry to determine the computers in the data processing system and the computer programs executing on each computer; and
for each computer,
for each computer program executing on the computer,
determining whether the computer program has terminated execution; and
when it is determined that the computer program has terminated execution, starting the computer program.
5. The method of claim1, wherein the step of determining when a new computer is added to the data processing system occurs periodically.
6. The method of claim1, wherein the step of determining when a new computer is added to the data processing system occurs in accordance with a predetermined amount of time set by an administrator of the data processing system.
7. The method of claim1, wherein the step of determining when a new computer is added to the data processing system occurs in accordance with an instruction of an administrator.
8. A computer-readable medium containing instructions for controlling a data processing system having software and a plurality of computers, wherein the data processing system is managed by an administrator, the software having editions that are particular to a natural language, a type of process and a type of operating system, a method for monitoring the computers of a data processing system and automatically configuring a new computer to operate in the data processing system, by performing the steps of:
determining when a new computer is added to the data processing system by comparing a stored list of the plurality of computers against a current list of the plurality of computer of the data processing system, the new computer having an associated natural language, executes a functioning operating system and having a processor;
determining what software is to be automatically installed on the new computer based on preferences of the administrator;
determining the natural language associated with the new computer, a type of the operating system executing on the new computer and a type of the processor in the new computer;
selecting an edition of the software particular to the natural language, the type of the operating system and the type of the processor; and
automatically installing the selected edition of the software onto the new computer utilizing commands suitable for the type of the operating system of the new computer, resulting in the new computer having the software defined by the administrator based upon the particular location of the new computer within the data processing system.
9. The computer-readable memory of claim8 wherein the step of installing the selected edition includes the step of starting the selected edition of the software.
10. The computer-readable memory of claim8 wherein the data processing system has a centralized management system for managing the computers, and wherein the software installed on the new computer is a service of the centralized management system for managing the computers.
11. The computer-readable memory of claim8 wherein a plurality of computer programs execute on each computer, wherein the data processing system has a registry containing entries indicating the computers in the data processing system and entries indicating the computer programs executing on each computer, wherein the method further includes the steps of:
accessing the registry to determine the computers in the data processing system and the computer programs executing on each computer; and
for each computer,
for each computer program executing on the computer,
determining whether the computer program has terminated execution; and
when it is determined that the computer program has terminated execution, starting the computer program.
12. A software installation computer system for managing the installation of a program in other computer systems connected to the software installation computer system using modifiable installation directions defined by an administrator, comprising:
a new connected computer system detection subsystem that detects the connection of an additional computer system to the software installation computer system by comparing a stored list of the computer systems against a current list of the computer systems connected to the software installation computer system;
an installed software selection subsystem that selects, for each new computer system whose connection to the software installation computer system is detected by the detection subsystem, based upon the installation directions, software for installation on the new computer system;
a new computer system assessment subsystem that determines, for each new computer system whose connection to the software installation computer system is detected by the detection subsystem, a natural language, processor type, and an operating system type, defining a functioning operation system installed on the new computer system, of the new computer system; and
a software installation subsystem that automatically installs on each new computer system whose connection to the software installation computer system is detected by the detection subsystem an edition of the selected software designed for the natural language, processor type, and operating system type determined for the new computer system by the assessment subsystem, resulting in the new computer having the selected software defined by the administrator based upon the particular location of the new computer with respect to the software installation computer system.
13. The system of claim12, wherein the new connected computer system detection subsystem dynamically detects the connection of an additional computer system to the software installation computer system.
14. The system of claim12, wherein the software installation subsystem dynamically installs the selected software on each new computer system.
US09/397,4801995-03-101999-09-16Automatic software installation on heterogeneous networked computer systemsExpired - LifetimeUS6282712B1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application NumberPriority DateFiling DateTitle
US09/397,480US6282712B1 (en)1995-03-101999-09-16Automatic software installation on heterogeneous networked computer systems
US09/916,866US7124409B2 (en)1995-03-102001-07-27Automatic software installation on heterogeneous networked computer systems

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application NumberPriority DateFiling DateTitle
US40324495A1995-03-101995-03-10
US09/397,480US6282712B1 (en)1995-03-101999-09-16Automatic software installation on heterogeneous networked computer systems

Related Parent Applications (2)

Application NumberTitlePriority DateFiling Date
US40324495ADivision1995-03-101995-03-10
US40324495AContinuation1995-03-101995-03-10

Related Child Applications (1)

Application NumberTitlePriority DateFiling Date
US09/916,866ContinuationUS7124409B2 (en)1995-03-102001-07-27Automatic software installation on heterogeneous networked computer systems

Publications (1)

Publication NumberPublication Date
US6282712B1true US6282712B1 (en)2001-08-28

Family

ID=23595058

Family Applications (2)

Application NumberTitlePriority DateFiling Date
US09/397,480Expired - LifetimeUS6282712B1 (en)1995-03-101999-09-16Automatic software installation on heterogeneous networked computer systems
US09/916,866Expired - Fee RelatedUS7124409B2 (en)1995-03-102001-07-27Automatic software installation on heterogeneous networked computer systems

Family Applications After (1)

Application NumberTitlePriority DateFiling Date
US09/916,866Expired - Fee RelatedUS7124409B2 (en)1995-03-102001-07-27Automatic software installation on heterogeneous networked computer systems

Country Status (1)

CountryLink
US (2)US6282712B1 (en)

Cited By (119)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
US20010052121A1 (en)*2000-04-172001-12-13Takahiro MasudaInstallation method, activation method, execution apparatus and medium of application program
US20010056572A1 (en)*2000-06-192001-12-27Hewlett-Packard CompanyProcess for installing a software package in a client computer, and server for doing the same
US20020032748A1 (en)*2000-09-122002-03-14Toshihiko MyojoCommunication apparatus detecting method
US6360255B1 (en)*1998-06-252002-03-19Cisco Technology, Inc.Automatically integrating an external network with a network management system
US20020049866A1 (en)*2000-06-082002-04-25Toshio YamaguchiDistributed object management method, implementation system and recording medium for recording the processing program for the method
US20020083183A1 (en)*2000-11-062002-06-27Sanjay PujareConventionally coded application conversion system for streamed delivery and execution
US20020092014A1 (en)*2000-12-082002-07-11Yasuo ShibusawaSoftware installing method and system
US20020091763A1 (en)*2000-11-062002-07-11Shah Lacky VasantClient-side performance optimization system for streamed applications
US20020100036A1 (en)*2000-09-222002-07-25Patchlink.Com CorporationNon-invasive automatic offsite patch fingerprinting and updating system and method
US6453469B1 (en)*1999-06-182002-09-17Phoenix Technologies Ltd.Method and apparatus to automatically deinstall an application module when not functioning
US20020157089A1 (en)*2000-11-062002-10-24Amit PatelClient installation and execution system for streamed applications
US6493594B1 (en)*1999-06-042002-12-10Lucent Technologies Inc.System and method for improved software configuration and control management in multi-module systems
US20030009538A1 (en)*2000-11-062003-01-09Shah Lacky VasantNetwork caching system for streamed applications
US20030037325A1 (en)*2001-08-172003-02-20Hargrove David C.System and methods for automatically installing a correct software version from media containing multiple software versions
US20030061342A1 (en)*2001-09-272003-03-27International Business Machines CorporationApparatus and method of representing real-time distributed command execution status across distributed systems
US20030069944A1 (en)*1998-12-142003-04-10Denise Lynnette BarlockMethods, systems and computer program products for management of preferences in a heterogeneous computing environment
US6578142B1 (en)*1999-06-182003-06-10Phoenix Technologies, Ltd.Method and apparatus for automatically installing and configuring software on a computer
US20030115302A1 (en)*2001-03-302003-06-19Seiko Epson CorporationNetwork technique for troubleshooting
US20030126472A1 (en)*2001-12-312003-07-03Banzhof Carl E.Automated computer vulnerability resolution system
US6615405B1 (en)2000-01-062003-09-02Power Quest CorporationMethod and system for distributing and maintaining software across a computer network
US20030195921A1 (en)*2002-03-192003-10-16Becker Brian EricSystem and method for configurable software provisioning
WO2003090107A1 (en)*2002-04-172003-10-30Everdream CorporationMethod and system to manage services for multiple managed computer systems
US6668375B1 (en)*1999-12-152003-12-23Pitney Bowes Inc.Method and system for providing build-to-order software applications
US20040003266A1 (en)*2000-09-222004-01-01Patchlink CorporationNon-invasive automatic offsite patch fingerprinting and updating system and method
US20040006688A1 (en)*2002-06-282004-01-08Pike Nicky D.Automated system setup
US6678888B1 (en)*1999-08-262004-01-13Hitachi, Ltd.Method and system for software distribution
US6681323B1 (en)*1999-11-292004-01-20Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.Method and system for automatically installing an initial software configuration including an operating system module from a library containing at least two operating system modules based on retrieved computer identification data
US6684397B1 (en)*1997-09-082004-01-27Novell, Inc.Auto-install apparatus and method
US20040054764A1 (en)*2002-09-122004-03-18Harry AdertonSystem and method for enhanced software updating and revision
US20040088700A1 (en)*2002-10-312004-05-06Chung-I LeeSystem and method for automatically installing software on client computers via a network
US20040088397A1 (en)*2002-11-052004-05-06Sidley Austin Brown & Wood Llp.System and method for management of software applications
US6735625B1 (en)*1998-05-292004-05-11Cisco Technology, Inc.System and method for automatically determining whether a product is compatible with a physical device in a network
US20040123283A1 (en)*2002-12-202004-06-24Brown Mark S.Automated updates of software and systems
US20040153823A1 (en)*2003-01-172004-08-05Zubair AnsariSystem and method for active diagnosis and self healing of software systems
US6795084B2 (en)2002-01-022004-09-21Canon Kabushiki KaishaHeuristic determination of color reproduction parameters
US20040215704A1 (en)*2001-08-072004-10-28Bartholomaus KellererCoupler for a data processing apparatus
WO2005003968A1 (en)*2003-07-022005-01-13Bay Technologies Pty LtdProcedure implementation
US20050010915A1 (en)*2003-07-112005-01-13Chih-Wei ChenNetwork-based server code auto upgrade method and system
US20050010819A1 (en)*2003-02-142005-01-13Williams John LeslieSystem and method for generating machine auditable network policies
US20050060397A1 (en)*2002-04-192005-03-17Computer Associates Think, Inc.Method and system for managing a computer system
US20050144528A1 (en)*2003-08-292005-06-30Tim BucherComputing device configuration manager
US20050160420A1 (en)*2004-01-202005-07-21Kruta Andrew W.Method and apparatus for distribution and installation of computer programs across an enterprise
US20050166266A1 (en)*2004-01-282005-07-28Shinya TaniguchiService providing system, application management system, service providing apparatus, service providing program, application management program, recording medium, service providing method, and application management method
US20050188110A1 (en)*2004-01-202005-08-25Mike HollatzIP ACD using buffer server
US20050256952A1 (en)*2000-05-222005-11-17Microsoft CorporationNetwork and method for implementing network platform services for a computing device
US20050257267A1 (en)*2003-02-142005-11-17Williams John LNetwork audit and policy assurance system
SG116526A1 (en)*2003-01-172005-11-28Dell Products LpProcess for controlling out of box experience customization.
US6978265B2 (en)2001-01-162005-12-20Lakeside Software, Inc.System and method for managing information for a plurality of computer systems in a distributed network
US6981250B1 (en)*2001-07-052005-12-27Microsoft CorporationSystem and methods for providing versioning of software components in a computer programming language
WO2006022534A1 (en)*2004-08-272006-03-02Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Cellular mobile communication system and method using heterogeneous wireless network
US20060089946A1 (en)*2001-01-162006-04-27Schumacher Michael KSystem and method for managing information for a plurality of computer systems in a distributed network
US20060100853A1 (en)*2004-11-092006-05-11Mcentee Robert ASystem and method for generating grammatically correct text strings
US20060101449A1 (en)*2004-10-292006-05-11Caterpillar Inc.Location based software flashing system
US7047527B1 (en)*2002-07-182006-05-16Unisys CorporationMethod for identification of version levels of components across heterogeneous systems while eliminating mis-matched versions
US7062567B2 (en)2000-11-062006-06-13Endeavors Technology, Inc.Intelligent network streaming and execution system for conventionally coded applications
US20060129672A1 (en)*2001-03-272006-06-15Redseal Systems, Inc., A Corporation Of DelawareMethod and apparatus for network wide policy-based analysis of configurations of devices
US20060129670A1 (en)*2001-03-272006-06-15Redseal Systems, Inc.Method and apparatus for network wide policy-based analysis of configurations of devices
WO2005089209A3 (en)*2004-03-122006-09-08Microsoft CorpApplication programming interface for administering the distribution of software updates in an update distribution system
US7107330B1 (en)*2000-11-092006-09-12International Business Machines CorporationData processing system and method for distributing a device driver to a plurality of client computer systems each executing different operating systems
US20070074197A1 (en)*2005-08-302007-03-29Novell, Inc.Automatic dependency resolution
US20070088630A1 (en)*2005-09-292007-04-19Microsoft CorporationAssessment and/or deployment of computer network component(s)
US7240162B2 (en)2004-10-222007-07-03Stream Theory, Inc.System and method for predictive streaming
US20070156902A1 (en)*2005-12-302007-07-05Becker Wolfgang ASystems and methods for implementing a tenant space in a provider-tenant environment
US20070156806A1 (en)*2005-12-302007-07-05Becker Wolfgang ASystems and methods for deploying a tenant in a provider-tenant environment
US20070156700A1 (en)*2005-12-302007-07-05Wolfgang BeckerSystems and methods for generating tenant-specific properties for use in a provider-tenant environment
US20070156901A1 (en)*2005-12-302007-07-05Wolfgang BeckerGeneration and use of table links in a provider-tenant environment
US20070156650A1 (en)*2005-12-302007-07-05Becker Wolfgang ASystems and methods for accessing a shared space in a provider-tenant environment
US20070156849A1 (en)*2005-12-302007-07-05Wolfgang BeckerSystems and methods for delivering software upgrades in a provider-tenant environment
US20070162452A1 (en)*2005-12-302007-07-12Becker Wolfgang ASystems and methods for implementing a shared space in a provider-tenant environment
US20070283007A1 (en)*2002-01-152007-12-06Keir Robin MSystem And Method For Network Vulnerability Detection And Reporting
US20080025243A1 (en)*2003-10-072008-01-31Accenture Global Services GmbhMobile Provisioning Tool System
US7340520B1 (en)2002-04-012008-03-04Microsoft CorporationSystem and method to facilitate manageable and agile deployment of services in accordance with various topologies
US20080162587A1 (en)*2006-12-292008-07-03Ulrich AuerServer synchronization for maintenance activities
US20080162491A1 (en)*2006-12-292008-07-03Becker Wolfgang AMethod and system for cloning a tenant database in a multi-tenant system
US20080162490A1 (en)*2006-12-292008-07-03Becker Wolfgang AMethods and systems for automatic registration during deployment of a tenant
US20080162536A1 (en)*2006-12-292008-07-03Becker Wolfgang ASystems and methods for extending shared data structures with tenant content in a provider-tenant environment
US20080162483A1 (en)*2006-12-292008-07-03Becker Wolfgang AMethods and systems for protecting shared tables against unauthorized overwriting from a tenant space in a mega-tenancy environment
US20080162660A1 (en)*2006-12-292008-07-03Becker Wolfgang ASystems and methods for accessing a shared space in a provider-tenant environment by using middleware
US20080184241A1 (en)*2007-01-302008-07-31Microsoft CorporationTechniques for automated balancing of tasks across multiple computers
US7437723B1 (en)*1999-12-152008-10-14Hitachi, LtdSystem for managing distribution of programs
US20080270114A1 (en)*2007-04-252008-10-30Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Portable computer and control method thereof
US7451196B1 (en)2000-12-152008-11-11Stream Theory, Inc.Method and system for executing a software application in a virtual environment
US20080320466A1 (en)*2007-06-202008-12-25Dias Eric W BAutomatic software installation and cleanup
US7519954B1 (en)2004-04-082009-04-14Mcafee, Inc.System and method of operating system identification
US7577751B2 (en)1997-06-162009-08-18Stream Theory, Inc./Endeavors Technologies, Inc.Software streaming system and method
US7587715B1 (en)*2002-12-312009-09-08Emc CorporationSystem and method for selective installation of one or more components for a data storage management system
US7587713B1 (en)*2002-12-312009-09-08Emc CorporationSystem and method for controlling installation of one or more components for a data storage management system
US7707571B1 (en)2001-01-052010-04-27New Boundary Technologies Inc.Software distribution systems and methods using one or more channels
US7779406B2 (en)1999-04-162010-08-17Microsoft CorporationMethod and system for managing lifecycles of deployed applications
US20100257518A1 (en)*2009-04-022010-10-07International Business Machines CorporationAutomatically recommending an upgrade approach for a customizable software product
US7849457B1 (en)*2006-04-202010-12-07Juan PulidoProcess for automatic & unattended formatting and re-installation of operative system, OS updates, drivers and re-installation of software applications, launched from a website as a digital service
US7917607B2 (en)2005-12-302011-03-29Sap AgSoftware management systems and methods, including use of such systems and methods in a provider-tenant environment
US7962603B1 (en)*2000-06-062011-06-14Nobuyoshi MorimotoSystem and method for identifying individual users accessing a web site
US20110153576A1 (en)*2009-12-222011-06-23Daniel FigusMulti-Client Generic Persistence for Extension Fields
US8001523B1 (en)2001-07-052011-08-16Microsoft CorporationSystem and methods for implementing an explicit interface member in a computer programming language
US8024523B2 (en)2007-11-072011-09-20Endeavors Technologies, Inc.Opportunistic block transmission with time constraints
US8069184B2 (en)2006-12-292011-11-29Sap AgSystems and methods to implement extensibility of tenant content in a provider-tenant environment
US8135823B2 (en)2002-01-152012-03-13Mcafee, Inc.System and method for network vulnerability detection and reporting
US20120084413A1 (en)*2010-10-052012-04-05Red Hat Israel, Ltd.Mechanism for Installing Monitoring Utilities Using Universal Performance Monitor
US8201257B1 (en)2004-03-312012-06-12Mcafee, Inc.System and method of managing network security risks
US8261345B2 (en)2006-10-232012-09-04Endeavors Technologies, Inc.Rule-based application access management
US20130006603A1 (en)*2011-06-302013-01-03Verizon Patent And Licensing, Inc.Graphical user interface localization systems and methods
US8359591B2 (en)2004-11-132013-01-22Streamtheory, Inc.Streaming from a media device
US8417796B2 (en)2006-01-172013-04-09Leostream CorporationSystem and method for transferring a computing environment between computers of dissimilar configurations
US8505005B1 (en)*2007-07-242013-08-06United Services Automobile Association (Usaa)Multi-platform network-based software distribution
US8615582B2 (en)2002-01-152013-12-24Mcafee, Inc.System and method for network vulnerability detection and reporting
US8831995B2 (en)2000-11-062014-09-09Numecent Holdings, Inc.Optimized server for streamed applications
US8892738B2 (en)2007-11-072014-11-18Numecent Holdings, Inc.Deriving component statistics for a stream enabled application
US8959503B2 (en)2012-10-052015-02-17Microsoft Technology Licensing LlcApplication version gatekeeping during upgrade
TWI493465B (en)*2011-07-282015-07-21Yahoo IncMethod and system for distributed application stack deployment
US9256488B2 (en)2010-10-052016-02-09Red Hat Israel, Ltd.Verification of template integrity of monitoring templates used for customized monitoring of system activities
US9363107B2 (en)2010-10-052016-06-07Red Hat Israel, Ltd.Accessing and processing monitoring data resulting from customized monitoring of system activities
US9524224B2 (en)2010-10-052016-12-20Red Hat Israel, Ltd.Customized monitoring of system activities
EP3151512A4 (en)*2014-05-282017-05-03ZTE CorporationService authentication processing method and apparatus
US9716609B2 (en)2005-03-232017-07-25Numecent Holdings, Inc.System and method for tracking changes to files in streaming applications
US20190087177A1 (en)*2017-06-092019-03-21Citrix Systems, Inc.Systems and methods for preventing service disruption during software updates
US10942836B2 (en)2017-10-262021-03-09Nutanix, Inc.Application curation
US11288104B2 (en)*2019-08-062022-03-29International Business Machines CorporationAutomatic dynamic operating system provisioning
RU2799736C2 (en)*2021-05-202023-07-11федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Российский государственный университет им. А.Н. Косыгина (Технологии. Дизайн. Искусство)"Method and system for making a decision about the readiness of computers in a local area network for work

Families Citing this family (83)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
HK1040195B (en)1998-08-192006-06-02Skyepharma Canada Inc.Injectable aqueous dispersions of propofol
US7146608B1 (en)*1999-09-282006-12-05Cisco Technology, Inc.Method and system for a software release process
US20060020688A1 (en)*2001-05-142006-01-26At&T Corp.System having generalized client-server computing
US20030005177A1 (en)*2001-06-302003-01-02Duran Louis A.Loading files for a hardware device
US20030055932A1 (en)*2001-09-192003-03-20Dell Products L.P.System and method for configuring a storage area network
US7839987B1 (en)2001-11-012010-11-23Callwave, Inc.Methods and systems for creating a dynamic call log and contact records
US20030140128A1 (en)*2002-01-182003-07-24Dell Products L.P.System and method for validating a network
US7840673B1 (en)*2002-06-172010-11-23International Business Machines CorporationMethod and apparatus for management of hosted applications
US7577948B2 (en)*2003-07-022009-08-18Upgradedetect, Inc.System and method for providing computer upgrade information
US6711676B1 (en)*2002-10-152004-03-23Zomaya Group, Inc.System and method for providing computer upgrade information
US7257623B2 (en)*2003-05-282007-08-14Oracle International CorporationMethod and apparatus for ensuring an allowable client configuration for an application
US7814126B2 (en)*2003-06-252010-10-12Microsoft CorporationUsing task sequences to manage devices
US8086659B2 (en)*2003-06-252011-12-27Microsoft CorporationTask sequence interface
US7290258B2 (en)2003-06-252007-10-30Microsoft CorporationManaging multiple devices on which operating systems can be automatically deployed
US7698549B2 (en)*2003-08-152010-04-13Venafi, Inc.Program product for unified certificate requests from certificate authorities
US8539063B1 (en)2003-08-292013-09-17Mcafee, Inc.Method and system for containment of networked application client software by explicit human input
US20050076325A1 (en)*2003-10-022005-04-07International Business Machines CorporationAutomatic software update of nodes in a network data processing system
US7840968B1 (en)2003-12-172010-11-23Mcafee, Inc.Method and system for containment of usage of language interfaces
US7783735B1 (en)*2004-03-222010-08-24Mcafee, Inc.Containment of network communication
US8463879B2 (en)*2004-04-192013-06-11Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.Method and apparatus for automatic verification of a machine-readable map of networked devices
US7873955B1 (en)2004-09-072011-01-18Mcafee, Inc.Solidifying the executable software set of a computer
US7818734B2 (en)2005-01-212010-10-19Callwave, Inc.Methods and systems for transferring data over a network
US7965825B1 (en)*2005-05-022011-06-21Callwave, Inc.Methods and systems for transferring voice messages and faxes over a network
US7603552B1 (en)*2005-05-042009-10-13Mcafee, Inc.Piracy prevention using unique module translation
US20060294515A1 (en)*2005-06-232006-12-28International Business Machines CorporationCommon operating system install method
US20070016638A1 (en)*2005-06-302007-01-18Ian ElburySystem and method of application provisioning
US7856661B1 (en)2005-07-142010-12-21Mcafee, Inc.Classification of software on networked systems
US20070038897A1 (en)*2005-08-122007-02-15Theresia LainerMethod and system for delivering a software product from a central computer to a target computer via a computer network
US8122446B2 (en)2005-11-032012-02-21International Business Machines CorporationMethod and apparatus for provisioning software on a network of computers
US7751317B2 (en)*2006-01-262010-07-06Microsoft CorporationCost-aware networking over heterogeneous data channels
US7757269B1 (en)2006-02-022010-07-13Mcafee, Inc.Enforcing alignment of approved changes and deployed changes in the software change life-cycle
US8396152B2 (en)*2006-02-212013-03-12Qualcomm IncorporatedFeedback channel design for multiple-input multiple-output communication systems
US9461736B2 (en)*2006-02-212016-10-04Qualcomm IncorporatedMethod and apparatus for sub-slot packets in wireless communication
US8689025B2 (en)*2006-02-212014-04-01Qualcomm IncorporatedReduced terminal power consumption via use of active hold state
US8077595B2 (en)2006-02-212011-12-13Qualcomm IncorporatedFlexible time-frequency multiplexing structure for wireless communication
US7596615B2 (en)*2006-02-222009-09-29Microsoft CorporationMulti-server automated redundant service configuration
US7853945B2 (en)*2006-02-222010-12-14Michael KramerIntegrated computer server imaging
US20070234345A1 (en)*2006-02-222007-10-04Microsoft CorporationIntegrated multi-server installation
US7895573B1 (en)2006-03-272011-02-22Mcafee, Inc.Execution environment file inventory
US7870387B1 (en)2006-04-072011-01-11Mcafee, Inc.Program-based authorization
US8352930B1 (en)*2006-04-242013-01-08Mcafee, Inc.Software modification by group to minimize breakage
US8555404B1 (en)2006-05-182013-10-08Mcafee, Inc.Connectivity-based authorization
US8121626B1 (en)2006-06-052012-02-21Callwave, Inc.Method and systems for short message forwarding services
DE102006035890A1 (en)*2006-07-312008-02-07Abb Research Ltd. System and method for automatically installing and maintaining hardware and software in a distributed computer system
US7698305B2 (en)*2006-12-012010-04-13Microsoft CorporationProgram modification and loading times in computing devices
US8645948B2 (en)*2006-12-122014-02-04Qualcomm IncorporatedApparatus and methods for client-driven server-side installation
US9424154B2 (en)2007-01-102016-08-23Mcafee, Inc.Method of and system for computer system state checks
US8332929B1 (en)2007-01-102012-12-11Mcafee, Inc.Method and apparatus for process enforced configuration management
US8429626B2 (en)2007-02-152013-04-23Microsoft CorporationPackaging content updates
US8161456B2 (en)*2007-05-302012-04-17International Business Machines CorporationManagement of heterogeneous software artifacts through a common representation
US8195931B1 (en)2007-10-312012-06-05Mcafee, Inc.Application change control
US20090183182A1 (en)*2008-01-102009-07-16Microsoft CorporationDynamic Composition of Virtualized Applications
US8515075B1 (en)2008-01-312013-08-20Mcafee, Inc.Method of and system for malicious software detection using critical address space protection
US9690913B2 (en)*2008-02-252017-06-27International Business Machines CorporationLicense management in a networked software application solution
US8615502B2 (en)2008-04-182013-12-24Mcafee, Inc.Method of and system for reverse mapping vnode pointers
US8438559B2 (en)*2008-04-182013-05-07Oracle America, Inc.Method and system for platform-agnostic software installation
US8544003B1 (en)2008-12-112013-09-24Mcafee, Inc.System and method for managing virtual machine configurations
US8381284B2 (en)2009-08-212013-02-19Mcafee, Inc.System and method for enforcing security policies in a virtual environment
US8341627B2 (en)2009-08-212012-12-25Mcafee, Inc.Method and system for providing user space address protection from writable memory area in a virtual environment
US9298445B1 (en)*2009-09-042016-03-29Symantec CorporationSystems and methods for correlating software inventory information with delivered software
US9552497B2 (en)2009-11-102017-01-24Mcafee, Inc.System and method for preventing data loss using virtual machine wrapped applications
US8938800B2 (en)2010-07-282015-01-20Mcafee, Inc.System and method for network level protection against malicious software
US8925101B2 (en)2010-07-282014-12-30Mcafee, Inc.System and method for local protection against malicious software
US8549003B1 (en)2010-09-122013-10-01Mcafee, Inc.System and method for clustering host inventories
US9207928B2 (en)*2011-01-172015-12-08Bladelogic, Inc.Computer-readable medium, apparatus, and methods of automatic capability installation
US9075993B2 (en)2011-01-242015-07-07Mcafee, Inc.System and method for selectively grouping and managing program files
US9112830B2 (en)2011-02-232015-08-18Mcafee, Inc.System and method for interlocking a host and a gateway
US9424018B2 (en)2011-03-212016-08-23Microsoft Technology Licensing, LlcFiltering and promoting application store applications
US9594881B2 (en)2011-09-092017-03-14Mcafee, Inc.System and method for passive threat detection using virtual memory inspection
US8694738B2 (en)2011-10-112014-04-08Mcafee, Inc.System and method for critical address space protection in a hypervisor environment
US9069586B2 (en)2011-10-132015-06-30Mcafee, Inc.System and method for kernel rootkit protection in a hypervisor environment
US8973144B2 (en)2011-10-132015-03-03Mcafee, Inc.System and method for kernel rootkit protection in a hypervisor environment
US8713668B2 (en)2011-10-172014-04-29Mcafee, Inc.System and method for redirected firewall discovery in a network environment
US8800024B2 (en)2011-10-172014-08-05Mcafee, Inc.System and method for host-initiated firewall discovery in a network environment
US8739272B1 (en)2012-04-022014-05-27Mcafee, Inc.System and method for interlocking a host and a gateway
US8875127B2 (en)2012-10-022014-10-28Nextbit Systems Inc.Operating system customization
US9106721B2 (en)2012-10-022015-08-11Nextbit SystemsApplication state synchronization across multiple devices
US9038060B2 (en)*2012-10-022015-05-19Nextbit Systems Inc.Automatically installing operating system specific to a detected network
US8973146B2 (en)2012-12-272015-03-03Mcafee, Inc.Herd based scan avoidance system in a network environment
WO2015060857A1 (en)2013-10-242015-04-30Mcafee, Inc.Agent assisted malicious application blocking in a network environment
CN106547600A (en)*2016-11-222017-03-29郑州云海信息技术有限公司A kind of remote auto installs the method and system of whole machine cabinet host operating system
WO2020086086A1 (en)*2018-10-252020-04-30Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.Installation package for use with heterogeneous operating systems
US10904088B2 (en)*2018-11-152021-01-26Western Digital Technologies, Inc.Reconfiguring network settings for operating configuration installation

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
US5184312A (en)*1985-10-131993-02-02The Boeing CompanyDistributed built-in test equipment system for digital avionics
US5499357A (en)*1993-05-281996-03-12Xerox CorporationProcess for configuration management
US5717930A (en)*1994-09-191998-02-10Seiko Epson CorporationInstallation system
US5742829A (en)*1995-03-101998-04-21Microsoft CorporationAutomatic software installation on heterogeneous networked client computer systems
US5758342A (en)*1995-01-231998-05-26International Business Machines CorporationClient server based multi-processor file system wherein client files written to by a client processor are invisible to the server
US5794052A (en)*1995-02-271998-08-11Ast Research, Inc.Method of software installation and setup

Family Cites Families (28)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
US4558413A (en)*1983-11-211985-12-10Xerox CorporationSoftware version management system
US4714995A (en)*1985-09-131987-12-22Trw Inc.Computer integration system
JPS6276954A (en)*1985-09-301987-04-09Toshiba Corp Communication control device
US4953162A (en)*1987-08-261990-08-28Lyons Paul JMultipath local area network
US5005122A (en)*1987-09-081991-04-02Digital Equipment CorporationArrangement with cooperating management server node and network service node
US5485370A (en)*1988-05-051996-01-16Transaction Technology, Inc.Home services delivery system with intelligent terminal emulator
US4891785A (en)*1988-07-081990-01-02Donohoo Theodore JMethod for transferring data files between computers in a network response to generalized application program instructions
US5195183A (en)*1989-01-311993-03-16Norand CorporationData communication system with communicating and recharging docking apparatus for hand-held data terminal
US5473772A (en)*1991-04-021995-12-05International Business Machines CorporationAutomatic update of static and dynamic files at a remote network node in response to calls issued by or for application programs
EP0456249B1 (en)*1990-05-101998-12-09Hewlett-Packard CompanySystem for integrating application programs in a heterogeneous network enviroment
AU639802B2 (en)*1990-08-141993-08-05Oracle International CorporationMethods and apparatus for providing dynamic invocation of applications in a distributed heterogeneous environment
JPH0792744B2 (en)*1990-08-201995-10-09インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレイション A method of installing multi-level application software on a data processing device.
US5317568A (en)*1991-04-111994-05-31Galileo International PartnershipMethod and apparatus for managing and facilitating communications in a distributed hetergeneous network
US5450582A (en)*1991-05-151995-09-12Matsushita Graphic Communication Systems, Inc.Network system with a plurality of nodes for administrating communications terminals
US5428772A (en)*1991-10-011995-06-27Prime Computer, Inc.Data processing system providing user interaction in multiple natural languages
WO1993020511A1 (en)*1992-03-311993-10-14Aggregate Computing, Inc.An integrated remote execution system for a heterogenous computer network environment
US5359730A (en)*1992-12-041994-10-25International Business Machines CorporationMethod of operating a data processing system having a dynamic software update facility
US5600797A (en)*1993-11-241997-02-04Intel CorporationSystem for identifying new client and allocating bandwidth thereto by monitoring transmission of message received periodically from client computers informing of their current status
US5421009A (en)*1993-12-221995-05-30Hewlett-Packard CompanyMethod of remotely installing software directly from a central computer
US5845090A (en)*1994-02-141998-12-01Platinium Technology, Inc.System for software distribution in a digital computer network
US5497460A (en)*1994-06-201996-03-05International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for determining network connectivity
US5596723A (en)*1994-06-231997-01-21Dell Usa, LpMethod and apparatus for automatically detecting the available network services in a network system
US5526358A (en)*1994-08-191996-06-11Peerlogic, Inc.Node management in scalable distributed computing enviroment
US5630076A (en)*1995-05-051997-05-13Apple Computer, Inc.Dynamic device matching using driver candidate lists
US5802286A (en)*1995-05-221998-09-01Bay Networks, Inc.Method and apparatus for configuring a virtual network
US6119186A (en)*1997-05-302000-09-12Texas Instruments IncorporatedComputer system with environmental manager for detecting and responding to changing environmental conditions
US6209089B1 (en)*1998-08-122001-03-27Microsoft CorporationCorrecting for changed client machine hardware using a server-based operating system
JP3671759B2 (en)*1999-08-262005-07-13株式会社日立製作所 Software distribution method and system

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
US5184312A (en)*1985-10-131993-02-02The Boeing CompanyDistributed built-in test equipment system for digital avionics
US5499357A (en)*1993-05-281996-03-12Xerox CorporationProcess for configuration management
US5717930A (en)*1994-09-191998-02-10Seiko Epson CorporationInstallation system
US5758342A (en)*1995-01-231998-05-26International Business Machines CorporationClient server based multi-processor file system wherein client files written to by a client processor are invisible to the server
US5794052A (en)*1995-02-271998-08-11Ast Research, Inc.Method of software installation and setup
US5742829A (en)*1995-03-101998-04-21Microsoft CorporationAutomatic software installation on heterogeneous networked client computer systems

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Digital Equipment Corporation, "Polycenter Software Installation Utility User's Guide", Digital Equipment Co., pp. i-xi, 1.1-1.3, 2.1-2.10, 3.1-3.3, 4.1-4.7, 5.1-5.6, 6.1, c.8-c.19, Mar. 1994.*
Lasan et al., "A natural-language interface to a constraint satisfaction system", IEEE, Formal Methods in HCI: III, IEE Colloquium on, pp. 6/1-6/8, 1989.*

Cited By (232)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
US8509230B2 (en)1997-06-162013-08-13Numecent Holdings, Inc.Software streaming system and method
US7577751B2 (en)1997-06-162009-08-18Stream Theory, Inc./Endeavors Technologies, Inc.Software streaming system and method
US9578075B2 (en)1997-06-162017-02-21Numecent Holdings, Inc.Software streaming system and method
US9094480B2 (en)1997-06-162015-07-28Numecent Holdings, Inc.Software streaming system and method
US6684397B1 (en)*1997-09-082004-01-27Novell, Inc.Auto-install apparatus and method
US7970877B1 (en)1998-05-292011-06-28Cisco Technology, Inc.System and method for interfacing with a component located in a network environment
US6735625B1 (en)*1998-05-292004-05-11Cisco Technology, Inc.System and method for automatically determining whether a product is compatible with a physical device in a network
US6360255B1 (en)*1998-06-252002-03-19Cisco Technology, Inc.Automatically integrating an external network with a network management system
US6651095B2 (en)*1998-12-142003-11-18International Business Machines CorporationMethods, systems and computer program products for management of preferences in a heterogeneous computing environment
US20030069944A1 (en)*1998-12-142003-04-10Denise Lynnette BarlockMethods, systems and computer program products for management of preferences in a heterogeneous computing environment
US7779406B2 (en)1999-04-162010-08-17Microsoft CorporationMethod and system for managing lifecycles of deployed applications
US6493594B1 (en)*1999-06-042002-12-10Lucent Technologies Inc.System and method for improved software configuration and control management in multi-module systems
US6453469B1 (en)*1999-06-182002-09-17Phoenix Technologies Ltd.Method and apparatus to automatically deinstall an application module when not functioning
US6578142B1 (en)*1999-06-182003-06-10Phoenix Technologies, Ltd.Method and apparatus for automatically installing and configuring software on a computer
US6678888B1 (en)*1999-08-262004-01-13Hitachi, Ltd.Method and system for software distribution
US6681323B1 (en)*1999-11-292004-01-20Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.Method and system for automatically installing an initial software configuration including an operating system module from a library containing at least two operating system modules based on retrieved computer identification data
US6668375B1 (en)*1999-12-152003-12-23Pitney Bowes Inc.Method and system for providing build-to-order software applications
US7437723B1 (en)*1999-12-152008-10-14Hitachi, LtdSystem for managing distribution of programs
US6615405B1 (en)2000-01-062003-09-02Power Quest CorporationMethod and system for distributing and maintaining software across a computer network
US7293268B2 (en)*2000-04-172007-11-06Fujitsu LimitedInstallation method, activation method, execution apparatus and medium of application program
US20010052121A1 (en)*2000-04-172001-12-13Takahiro MasudaInstallation method, activation method, execution apparatus and medium of application program
US20050256952A1 (en)*2000-05-222005-11-17Microsoft CorporationNetwork and method for implementing network platform services for a computing device
US7523172B2 (en)*2000-05-222009-04-21Microsoft CorporationNetwork and method for implementing network platform services for a computing device
US10878059B2 (en)2000-06-062020-12-29Nobuyoshi MorimotoSystem and method for identifying individual users accessing a web site
US7962603B1 (en)*2000-06-062011-06-14Nobuyoshi MorimotoSystem and method for identifying individual users accessing a web site
US8095654B2 (en)2000-06-062012-01-10Nobuyoshi MorimotoSystem and method for identifying individual users accessing a web site
US10031979B2 (en)2000-06-062018-07-24Nihon Dot.Com Co., LtdSystem and method for identifying individual users accessing a web site
US8849903B2 (en)2000-06-062014-09-30Nobuyoshi MorimotoSystem and method for identifying individual users accessing a web site
US7043735B2 (en)*2000-06-082006-05-09Hitachi, Ltd.System and method to dynamically select and locate server objects based on version information of the server objects
US20020049866A1 (en)*2000-06-082002-04-25Toshio YamaguchiDistributed object management method, implementation system and recording medium for recording the processing program for the method
US20010056572A1 (en)*2000-06-192001-12-27Hewlett-Packard CompanyProcess for installing a software package in a client computer, and server for doing the same
US20020032748A1 (en)*2000-09-122002-03-14Toshihiko MyojoCommunication apparatus detecting method
US7823147B2 (en)2000-09-222010-10-26Lumension Security, Inc.Non-invasive automatic offsite patch fingerprinting and updating system and method
US8407687B2 (en)2000-09-222013-03-26Lumension Security, Inc.Non-invasive automatic offsite patch fingerprinting and updating system and method
US6990660B2 (en)2000-09-222006-01-24Patchlink CorporationNon-invasive automatic offsite patch fingerprinting and updating system and method
US20110029966A1 (en)*2000-09-222011-02-03Lumension Security, Inc.Non-invasive automatic offsite patch fingerprinting and updating system and method
US20050257214A1 (en)*2000-09-222005-11-17Patchlink CorporationNon-invasive automatic offsite patch fingerprinting and updating system and method
US20020100036A1 (en)*2000-09-222002-07-25Patchlink.Com CorporationNon-invasive automatic offsite patch fingerprinting and updating system and method
US20040003266A1 (en)*2000-09-222004-01-01Patchlink CorporationNon-invasive automatic offsite patch fingerprinting and updating system and method
US20030009538A1 (en)*2000-11-062003-01-09Shah Lacky VasantNetwork caching system for streamed applications
US6959320B2 (en)2000-11-062005-10-25Endeavors Technology, Inc.Client-side performance optimization system for streamed applications
US20020157089A1 (en)*2000-11-062002-10-24Amit PatelClient installation and execution system for streamed applications
US9654548B2 (en)2000-11-062017-05-16Numecent Holdings, Inc.Intelligent network streaming and execution system for conventionally coded applications
US6918113B2 (en)2000-11-062005-07-12Endeavors Technology, Inc.Client installation and execution system for streamed applications
US8831995B2 (en)2000-11-062014-09-09Numecent Holdings, Inc.Optimized server for streamed applications
US9130953B2 (en)2000-11-062015-09-08Numecent Holdings, Inc.Intelligent network streaming and execution system for conventionally coded applications
US7043524B2 (en)2000-11-062006-05-09Omnishift Technologies, Inc.Network caching system for streamed applications
US20020083183A1 (en)*2000-11-062002-06-27Sanjay PujareConventionally coded application conversion system for streamed delivery and execution
US7062567B2 (en)2000-11-062006-06-13Endeavors Technology, Inc.Intelligent network streaming and execution system for conventionally coded applications
US20020091763A1 (en)*2000-11-062002-07-11Shah Lacky VasantClient-side performance optimization system for streamed applications
US7107330B1 (en)*2000-11-092006-09-12International Business Machines CorporationData processing system and method for distributing a device driver to a plurality of client computer systems each executing different operating systems
US20020092014A1 (en)*2000-12-082002-07-11Yasuo ShibusawaSoftware installing method and system
US7451196B1 (en)2000-12-152008-11-11Stream Theory, Inc.Method and system for executing a software application in a virtual environment
US7707571B1 (en)2001-01-052010-04-27New Boundary Technologies Inc.Software distribution systems and methods using one or more channels
US7865499B2 (en)2001-01-162011-01-04Lakeside Software, Inc.System and method for managing information for a plurality of computer systems in a distributed network
US6978265B2 (en)2001-01-162005-12-20Lakeside Software, Inc.System and method for managing information for a plurality of computer systems in a distributed network
US20060089946A1 (en)*2001-01-162006-04-27Schumacher Michael KSystem and method for managing information for a plurality of computer systems in a distributed network
US8438298B2 (en)2001-02-142013-05-07Endeavors Technologies, Inc.Intelligent network streaming and execution system for conventionally coded applications
US8893249B2 (en)2001-02-142014-11-18Numecent Holdings, Inc.Intelligent network streaming and execution system for conventionally coded applications
US20060129672A1 (en)*2001-03-272006-06-15Redseal Systems, Inc., A Corporation Of DelawareMethod and apparatus for network wide policy-based analysis of configurations of devices
US8135815B2 (en)2001-03-272012-03-13Redseal Systems, Inc.Method and apparatus for network wide policy-based analysis of configurations of devices
US20060129670A1 (en)*2001-03-272006-06-15Redseal Systems, Inc.Method and apparatus for network wide policy-based analysis of configurations of devices
US20030115302A1 (en)*2001-03-302003-06-19Seiko Epson CorporationNetwork technique for troubleshooting
US7284044B2 (en)*2001-03-302007-10-16Seiko Epson CorporationNetwork technique for troubleshooting
US20060026568A1 (en)*2001-07-052006-02-02Microsoft CorporationSystem and methods for providing versioning of software components in a computer programming language
US7873958B2 (en)*2001-07-052011-01-18Microsoft CorporationSystem and methods for providing versioning of software components in a computer programming language
US6981250B1 (en)*2001-07-052005-12-27Microsoft CorporationSystem and methods for providing versioning of software components in a computer programming language
US8001523B1 (en)2001-07-052011-08-16Microsoft CorporationSystem and methods for implementing an explicit interface member in a computer programming language
US20040215704A1 (en)*2001-08-072004-10-28Bartholomaus KellererCoupler for a data processing apparatus
US20030037325A1 (en)*2001-08-172003-02-20Hargrove David C.System and methods for automatically installing a correct software version from media containing multiple software versions
US20030061342A1 (en)*2001-09-272003-03-27International Business Machines CorporationApparatus and method of representing real-time distributed command execution status across distributed systems
US7660886B2 (en)*2001-09-272010-02-09International Business Machines CorporationApparatus and method of representing real-time distributed command execution status across distributed systems
US20050229256A2 (en)*2001-12-312005-10-13Citadel Security Software Inc.Automated Computer Vulnerability Resolution System
US20030126472A1 (en)*2001-12-312003-07-03Banzhof Carl E.Automated computer vulnerability resolution system
US7000247B2 (en)2001-12-312006-02-14Citadel Security Software, Inc.Automated computer vulnerability resolution system
US6795084B2 (en)2002-01-022004-09-21Canon Kabushiki KaishaHeuristic determination of color reproduction parameters
US8700767B2 (en)2002-01-152014-04-15Mcafee, Inc.System and method for network vulnerability detection and reporting
US7673043B2 (en)2002-01-152010-03-02Mcafee, Inc.System and method for network vulnerability detection and reporting
US8615582B2 (en)2002-01-152013-12-24Mcafee, Inc.System and method for network vulnerability detection and reporting
US8621060B2 (en)2002-01-152013-12-31Mcafee, Inc.System and method for network vulnerability detection and reporting
US8621073B2 (en)2002-01-152013-12-31Mcafee, Inc.System and method for network vulnerability detection and reporting
US8661126B2 (en)2002-01-152014-02-25Mcafee, Inc.System and method for network vulnerability detection and reporting
US8135823B2 (en)2002-01-152012-03-13Mcafee, Inc.System and method for network vulnerability detection and reporting
US20070283007A1 (en)*2002-01-152007-12-06Keir Robin MSystem And Method For Network Vulnerability Detection And Reporting
US20030195921A1 (en)*2002-03-192003-10-16Becker Brian EricSystem and method for configurable software provisioning
US7171659B2 (en)2002-03-192007-01-30Sun Microsystems, Inc.System and method for configurable software provisioning
US7636782B2 (en)2002-04-012009-12-22Microsoft CorporationSystem and method to facilitate manageable and agile deployment of services in accordance with various topologies
US20080216006A1 (en)*2002-04-012008-09-04Microsoft CorporationSystem and method to facilitate manageable and agile deployment of services in accordance with various topologies
US7340520B1 (en)2002-04-012008-03-04Microsoft CorporationSystem and method to facilitate manageable and agile deployment of services in accordance with various topologies
US8458300B2 (en)2002-04-172013-06-04Dell Marketing Usa, L.P.Method and system to manage services for multiple managed computer systems
US20110041079A1 (en)*2002-04-172011-02-17Dell Marketing Usa, L.P.Method and system to manage services for multiple managed computer systems
US7430590B1 (en)*2002-04-172008-09-30Everdream CorporationMethod and system to manage services for multiple managed computer systems
US9594547B2 (en)2002-04-172017-03-14Dell Marketing Usa, L.P.Method and system to manage services for multiple managed computer systems
WO2003090107A1 (en)*2002-04-172003-10-30Everdream CorporationMethod and system to manage services for multiple managed computer systems
US20050060397A1 (en)*2002-04-192005-03-17Computer Associates Think, Inc.Method and system for managing a computer system
US8561053B2 (en)*2002-04-192013-10-15Ca, Inc.Method and system for managing a computer system
US7266818B2 (en)*2002-06-282007-09-04Microsoft CorporationAutomated system setup
US20040006688A1 (en)*2002-06-282004-01-08Pike Nicky D.Automated system setup
US7047527B1 (en)*2002-07-182006-05-16Unisys CorporationMethod for identification of version levels of components across heterogeneous systems while eliminating mis-matched versions
US8375108B2 (en)*2002-09-122013-02-12Computer Sciences CorporationSystem and method for updating network computer systems
US20150301816A1 (en)*2002-09-122015-10-22Computer Sciences CorporationSystem and method for updating network computer systems
US20190065166A1 (en)*2002-09-122019-02-28Computer Sciences CorporationSystem and method for updating network computer systems
US20170269920A1 (en)*2002-09-122017-09-21Computer Sciences CorporationSystem and method for updating network computer systems
US7370092B2 (en)*2002-09-122008-05-06Computer Sciences CorporationSystem and method for enhanced software updating and revision
US20040054764A1 (en)*2002-09-122004-03-18Harry AdertonSystem and method for enhanced software updating and revision
US20090013318A1 (en)*2002-09-122009-01-08Harry AdertonSystem and method for updating network computer systems
US20040088700A1 (en)*2002-10-312004-05-06Chung-I LeeSystem and method for automatically installing software on client computers via a network
US20040088397A1 (en)*2002-11-052004-05-06Sidley Austin Brown & Wood Llp.System and method for management of software applications
US20040123283A1 (en)*2002-12-202004-06-24Brown Mark S.Automated updates of software and systems
US7093246B2 (en)*2002-12-202006-08-15International Business Machines CorporationAutomated updates of software and systems
US7587715B1 (en)*2002-12-312009-09-08Emc CorporationSystem and method for selective installation of one or more components for a data storage management system
US7587713B1 (en)*2002-12-312009-09-08Emc CorporationSystem and method for controlling installation of one or more components for a data storage management system
US20040153823A1 (en)*2003-01-172004-08-05Zubair AnsariSystem and method for active diagnosis and self healing of software systems
US7293201B2 (en)*2003-01-172007-11-06Microsoft CorporationSystem and method for active diagnosis and self healing of software systems
SG116526A1 (en)*2003-01-172005-11-28Dell Products LpProcess for controlling out of box experience customization.
US9094434B2 (en)2003-02-142015-07-28Mcafee, Inc.System and method for automated policy audit and remediation management
US7536456B2 (en)2003-02-142009-05-19Preventsys, Inc.System and method for applying a machine-processable policy rule to information gathered about a network
US7624422B2 (en)2003-02-142009-11-24Preventsys, Inc.System and method for security information normalization
US8789140B2 (en)2003-02-142014-07-22Preventsys, Inc.System and method for interfacing with heterogeneous network data gathering tools
US8793763B2 (en)2003-02-142014-07-29Preventsys, Inc.System and method for interfacing with heterogeneous network data gathering tools
US8091117B2 (en)2003-02-142012-01-03Preventsys, Inc.System and method for interfacing with heterogeneous network data gathering tools
US20050257267A1 (en)*2003-02-142005-11-17Williams John LNetwork audit and policy assurance system
US8561175B2 (en)2003-02-142013-10-15Preventsys, Inc.System and method for automated policy audit and remediation management
US7627891B2 (en)2003-02-142009-12-01Preventsys, Inc.Network audit and policy assurance system
US20050010819A1 (en)*2003-02-142005-01-13Williams John LeslieSystem and method for generating machine auditable network policies
US20050015623A1 (en)*2003-02-142005-01-20Williams John LeslieSystem and method for security information normalization
WO2005003968A1 (en)*2003-07-022005-01-13Bay Technologies Pty LtdProcedure implementation
US20050010915A1 (en)*2003-07-112005-01-13Chih-Wei ChenNetwork-based server code auto upgrade method and system
US20050144528A1 (en)*2003-08-292005-06-30Tim BucherComputing device configuration manager
US20080025243A1 (en)*2003-10-072008-01-31Accenture Global Services GmbhMobile Provisioning Tool System
US8315198B2 (en)*2003-10-072012-11-20Accenture Global Services LimitedMobile provisioning tool system
US20050160420A1 (en)*2004-01-202005-07-21Kruta Andrew W.Method and apparatus for distribution and installation of computer programs across an enterprise
US20050188110A1 (en)*2004-01-202005-08-25Mike HollatzIP ACD using buffer server
US20050166266A1 (en)*2004-01-282005-07-28Shinya TaniguchiService providing system, application management system, service providing apparatus, service providing program, application management program, recording medium, service providing method, and application management method
WO2005089209A3 (en)*2004-03-122006-09-08Microsoft CorpApplication programming interface for administering the distribution of software updates in an update distribution system
US8245218B2 (en)2004-03-122012-08-14Microsoft CorporationApplication programming interface for administering the distribution of software updates in an update distribution system
AU2005222887B2 (en)*2004-03-122010-07-01Microsoft Technology Licensing, LlcApplication programming interface for administering the distribution of software updates in an update distribution system
RU2386218C2 (en)*2004-03-122010-04-10Майкрософт КорпорейшнSoftware interface of applications for administration of software updates distribution in system of updates distribution
US20070143390A1 (en)*2004-03-122007-06-21Microsoft CorporationApplication programming interface for administering the distribution of software updates in an update distribution system
US8201257B1 (en)2004-03-312012-06-12Mcafee, Inc.System and method of managing network security risks
US7519954B1 (en)2004-04-082009-04-14Mcafee, Inc.System and method of operating system identification
WO2006022534A1 (en)*2004-08-272006-03-02Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Cellular mobile communication system and method using heterogeneous wireless network
US20060046728A1 (en)*2004-08-272006-03-02Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Cellular mobile communication system and method using heterogeneous wireless network
US7240162B2 (en)2004-10-222007-07-03Stream Theory, Inc.System and method for predictive streaming
US7487499B2 (en)2004-10-292009-02-03Caterpillar Inc.Location based software flashing system
US20060101449A1 (en)*2004-10-292006-05-11Caterpillar Inc.Location based software flashing system
US7983895B2 (en)*2004-11-092011-07-19Sony Online Entertainment LlcSystem and method for generating grammatically correct text strings
US20060100853A1 (en)*2004-11-092006-05-11Mcentee Robert ASystem and method for generating grammatically correct text strings
US8359591B2 (en)2004-11-132013-01-22Streamtheory, Inc.Streaming from a media device
US8949820B2 (en)2004-11-132015-02-03Numecent Holdings, Inc.Streaming from a media device
US10587473B2 (en)2005-03-232020-03-10Numecent Holdings, Inc.Opportunistic block transmission with time constraints
US8898391B2 (en)2005-03-232014-11-25Numecent Holdings, Inc.Opportunistic block transmission with time constraints
US9781007B2 (en)2005-03-232017-10-03Numecent Holdings, Inc.Opportunistic block transmission with time constraints
US8527706B2 (en)2005-03-232013-09-03Numecent Holdings, Inc.Opportunistic block transmission with time constraints
US11121928B2 (en)2005-03-232021-09-14Numecent Holdings, Inc.Opportunistic block transmission with time constraints
US9716609B2 (en)2005-03-232017-07-25Numecent Holdings, Inc.System and method for tracking changes to files in streaming applications
US9300752B2 (en)2005-03-232016-03-29Numecent Holdings, Inc.Opportunistic block transmission with time constraints
US8291405B2 (en)*2005-08-302012-10-16Novell, Inc.Automatic dependency resolution by identifying similar machine profiles
US20070074197A1 (en)*2005-08-302007-03-29Novell, Inc.Automatic dependency resolution
US20070088630A1 (en)*2005-09-292007-04-19Microsoft CorporationAssessment and/or deployment of computer network component(s)
US20070156849A1 (en)*2005-12-302007-07-05Wolfgang BeckerSystems and methods for delivering software upgrades in a provider-tenant environment
US20070162452A1 (en)*2005-12-302007-07-12Becker Wolfgang ASystems and methods for implementing a shared space in a provider-tenant environment
US7680825B2 (en)2005-12-302010-03-16Sap AgSystems and methods for generating tenant-specific properties for use in a provider-tenant environment
US7689593B2 (en)2005-12-302010-03-30Sap AgSystems and methods for accessing a shared space in a provider-tenant environment
US20070156806A1 (en)*2005-12-302007-07-05Becker Wolfgang ASystems and methods for deploying a tenant in a provider-tenant environment
US20070156902A1 (en)*2005-12-302007-07-05Becker Wolfgang ASystems and methods for implementing a tenant space in a provider-tenant environment
US20070156901A1 (en)*2005-12-302007-07-05Wolfgang BeckerGeneration and use of table links in a provider-tenant environment
US7917607B2 (en)2005-12-302011-03-29Sap AgSoftware management systems and methods, including use of such systems and methods in a provider-tenant environment
US20070156700A1 (en)*2005-12-302007-07-05Wolfgang BeckerSystems and methods for generating tenant-specific properties for use in a provider-tenant environment
US7698284B2 (en)2005-12-302010-04-13Sap AgSystems and methods for deploying a tenant in a provider-tenant environment
US7930318B2 (en)2005-12-302011-04-19Sap AgSystems and methods for implementing a tenant space in a provider-tenant environment
US20070156650A1 (en)*2005-12-302007-07-05Becker Wolfgang ASystems and methods for accessing a shared space in a provider-tenant environment
US7693851B2 (en)2005-12-302010-04-06Sap AgSystems and methods for implementing a shared space in a provider-tenant environment
US8417796B2 (en)2006-01-172013-04-09Leostream CorporationSystem and method for transferring a computing environment between computers of dissimilar configurations
US7849457B1 (en)*2006-04-202010-12-07Juan PulidoProcess for automatic & unattended formatting and re-installation of operative system, OS updates, drivers and re-installation of software applications, launched from a website as a digital service
US9571501B2 (en)2006-10-232017-02-14Numecent Holdings, Inc.Rule-based application access management
US9054963B2 (en)2006-10-232015-06-09Numecent Holdings, Inc.Rule-based application access management
US8782778B2 (en)2006-10-232014-07-15Numecent Holdings, Inc.Rule-based application access management
US12081548B2 (en)2006-10-232024-09-03Numecent Holdings, Inc.Rule-based application access management
US8752128B2 (en)2006-10-232014-06-10Numecent Holdings, Inc.Rule-based application access management
US11451548B2 (en)2006-10-232022-09-20Numecent Holdings, IncRule-based application access management
US9380063B2 (en)2006-10-232016-06-28Numecent Holdings, Inc.Rule-based application access management
US8261345B2 (en)2006-10-232012-09-04Endeavors Technologies, Inc.Rule-based application access management
US9699194B2 (en)2006-10-232017-07-04Numecent Holdings, Inc.Rule-based application access management
US9825957B2 (en)2006-10-232017-11-21Numecent Holdings, Inc.Rule-based application access management
US10057268B2 (en)2006-10-232018-08-21Numecent Holdings, Inc.Rule-based application access management
US10356100B2 (en)2006-10-232019-07-16Numecent Holdings, Inc.Rule-based application access management
US9054962B2 (en)2006-10-232015-06-09Numecent Holdings, Inc.Rule-based application access management
US20080162483A1 (en)*2006-12-292008-07-03Becker Wolfgang AMethods and systems for protecting shared tables against unauthorized overwriting from a tenant space in a mega-tenancy environment
US7933869B2 (en)2006-12-292011-04-26Sap AgMethod and system for cloning a tenant database in a multi-tenant system
US20080162660A1 (en)*2006-12-292008-07-03Becker Wolfgang ASystems and methods for accessing a shared space in a provider-tenant environment by using middleware
US20080162587A1 (en)*2006-12-292008-07-03Ulrich AuerServer synchronization for maintenance activities
US7739348B2 (en)2006-12-292010-06-15Sap AgSystems and methods for accessing a shared space in a provider-tenant environment by using middleware
US8069184B2 (en)2006-12-292011-11-29Sap AgSystems and methods to implement extensibility of tenant content in a provider-tenant environment
US20080162491A1 (en)*2006-12-292008-07-03Becker Wolfgang AMethod and system for cloning a tenant database in a multi-tenant system
US20080162490A1 (en)*2006-12-292008-07-03Becker Wolfgang AMethods and systems for automatic registration during deployment of a tenant
US20080162536A1 (en)*2006-12-292008-07-03Becker Wolfgang ASystems and methods for extending shared data structures with tenant content in a provider-tenant environment
US20080184241A1 (en)*2007-01-302008-07-31Microsoft CorporationTechniques for automated balancing of tasks across multiple computers
US8289281B2 (en)*2007-04-252012-10-16Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Portable computer and control method thereof
US20080270114A1 (en)*2007-04-252008-10-30Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Portable computer and control method thereof
US20080320466A1 (en)*2007-06-202008-12-25Dias Eric W BAutomatic software installation and cleanup
US8006241B2 (en)2007-06-202011-08-23International Business Machines CorporationAutomatic software installation and cleanup
US8505005B1 (en)*2007-07-242013-08-06United Services Automobile Association (Usaa)Multi-platform network-based software distribution
US9268548B1 (en)*2007-07-242016-02-23United Services Automobile Association (Usaa)Multi-platform network-based software distribution
US8661197B2 (en)2007-11-072014-02-25Numecent Holdings, Inc.Opportunistic block transmission with time constraints
US11740992B2 (en)2007-11-072023-08-29Numecent Holdings, Inc.Deriving component statistics for a stream enabled application
US11119884B2 (en)2007-11-072021-09-14Numecent Holdings, Inc.Deriving component statistics for a stream enabled application
US8892738B2 (en)2007-11-072014-11-18Numecent Holdings, Inc.Deriving component statistics for a stream enabled application
US10445210B2 (en)2007-11-072019-10-15Numecent Holdings, Inc.Deriving component statistics for a stream enabled application
US8024523B2 (en)2007-11-072011-09-20Endeavors Technologies, Inc.Opportunistic block transmission with time constraints
US9436578B2 (en)2007-11-072016-09-06Numecent Holdings, Inc.Deriving component statistics for a stream enabled application
US12271285B2 (en)2007-11-072025-04-08Numecent Holdings, Inc.Deriving component statistics for a stream enabled application
US20100257518A1 (en)*2009-04-022010-10-07International Business Machines CorporationAutomatically recommending an upgrade approach for a customizable software product
US8402452B2 (en)*2009-04-022013-03-19International Business Machines CorporationAutomatically recommending an upgrade approach for a customizable software product
US8224828B2 (en)2009-12-222012-07-17Sap AgMulti-client generic persistence for extension fields
US8805864B2 (en)2009-12-222014-08-12Sap AgMulti-client generic persistence for extension fields
US20110153576A1 (en)*2009-12-222011-06-23Daniel FigusMulti-Client Generic Persistence for Extension Fields
US9355004B2 (en)*2010-10-052016-05-31Red Hat Israel, Ltd.Installing monitoring utilities using universal performance monitor
US20120084413A1 (en)*2010-10-052012-04-05Red Hat Israel, Ltd.Mechanism for Installing Monitoring Utilities Using Universal Performance Monitor
US9524224B2 (en)2010-10-052016-12-20Red Hat Israel, Ltd.Customized monitoring of system activities
US9256488B2 (en)2010-10-052016-02-09Red Hat Israel, Ltd.Verification of template integrity of monitoring templates used for customized monitoring of system activities
US9363107B2 (en)2010-10-052016-06-07Red Hat Israel, Ltd.Accessing and processing monitoring data resulting from customized monitoring of system activities
US20130006603A1 (en)*2011-06-302013-01-03Verizon Patent And Licensing, Inc.Graphical user interface localization systems and methods
TWI493465B (en)*2011-07-282015-07-21Yahoo IncMethod and system for distributed application stack deployment
US8959503B2 (en)2012-10-052015-02-17Microsoft Technology Licensing LlcApplication version gatekeeping during upgrade
EP3151512A4 (en)*2014-05-282017-05-03ZTE CorporationService authentication processing method and apparatus
US10649765B2 (en)*2017-06-092020-05-12Citrix Systems, Inc.Systems and methods for preventing service disruption during software updates
US20190087177A1 (en)*2017-06-092019-03-21Citrix Systems, Inc.Systems and methods for preventing service disruption during software updates
US11645187B2 (en)2017-10-262023-05-09Nutanix, Inc.Application curation
US10942836B2 (en)2017-10-262021-03-09Nutanix, Inc.Application curation
US11288104B2 (en)*2019-08-062022-03-29International Business Machines CorporationAutomatic dynamic operating system provisioning
RU2799736C2 (en)*2021-05-202023-07-11федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Российский государственный университет им. А.Н. Косыгина (Технологии. Дизайн. Искусство)"Method and system for making a decision about the readiness of computers in a local area network for work

Also Published As

Publication numberPublication date
US20020002704A1 (en)2002-01-03
US7124409B2 (en)2006-10-17

Similar Documents

PublicationPublication DateTitle
US6282712B1 (en)Automatic software installation on heterogeneous networked computer systems
US5742829A (en)Automatic software installation on heterogeneous networked client computer systems
US7080372B1 (en)System and method for managing system configuration across a network
US7480699B2 (en)System and method for replacing an application on a server
US5924102A (en)System and method for managing critical files
US6523166B1 (en)Method and system for on-demand installation of software implementations
US6681392B1 (en)Method and apparatus for remote peripheral software installation
RU2429529C2 (en)Dynamic configuration, allocation and deployment of computer systems
US6836794B1 (en)Method and system for assigning and publishing applications
US8407694B2 (en)System and method for facilitating installing software
US8347263B1 (en)Repository including installation metadata for executable applications
US6047129A (en)Software updating and distribution
US5966715A (en)Application and database security and integrity system and method
US20030221094A1 (en)Method and system for configuring a computer
US6502099B1 (en)Method and system for extending the functionality of an application
CN102754073B (en)For the method and system that virtualized extension point is declaratively registered
US20050027846A1 (en)Automated electronic software distribution and management method and system
US20040034850A1 (en)Servicing a component-based software product throughout the software product lifecycle
US9699025B2 (en)System and method for managing multiple server node clusters using a hierarchical configuration data structure
US6820136B1 (en)System and method for replicating monitored registry keys
US6560719B1 (en)Method for recovery of original registry key file data
EP1105796A1 (en)Reconfiguration manager for controlling upgrades of electronic devices
JPH08272725A (en)System and method for judgment and operation of constituent conformation of server in distributed object environment
US7266817B1 (en)Method and system for creating packages for multiple platforms
US8490078B2 (en)System and method for application management

Legal Events

DateCodeTitleDescription
ASAssignment

Owner name:MICROSOFT CORPORATION, WASHINGTON

Free format text:ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DAVIS, MICHAEL L.;MCCOLLUM, RAYMOND W.;REEL/FRAME:010600/0406;SIGNING DATES FROM 20000119 TO 20000211

STCFInformation on status: patent grant

Free format text:PATENTED CASE

CCCertificate of correction
FPAYFee payment

Year of fee payment:4

FEPPFee payment procedure

Free format text:PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

FPAYFee payment

Year of fee payment:8

FPAYFee payment

Year of fee payment:12

ASAssignment

Owner name:MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC, WASHINGTON

Free format text:ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MICROSOFT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:034541/0001

Effective date:20141014


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp