BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTIONThe present invention relates to set screws and more particularly to improved vibration resistant set screws.
Set screws are used in various applications to removably secure fly wheels, pinions, pulleys, cams, propellers and the like to shafts. In such applications, the set screws experience both vibrations and shock loads which might tend to loosen them.
Many set screw points have been designed in the past to increase the ability of the set screw to resist vibration. Such solutions often include the provision of teeth at the point, as taught, for example, by U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,462,910 (issued Mar. 1, 1949 to L. E. Simmons); 2,245,525 (issued June 10, 1941 to R. W. Dicely); 3,419,058 (issued Dec. 31, 1968 to R. A. Walker); and 1,330,792 (issued Feb. 17, 1970 to H. H. Frick).
An alternative point configuration combining a counterbored point with an external knurl is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 2,992,669 (issued July 18, 1961 to H. R. Fesmire).
While these set screws have increased vibration resistance as compared with a plain point, they do not have sufficient resistance for all uses. What is needed, therefore, is a point design for a set screw having increased vibration resistance over these prior designs.
SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTIONThe present invention provides a set screw having a novel cup point configuration having increased vibration resistance.
The set screw has a threaded shank and a cup-point formed at one end of the shank. The cup-point has an outer frustoconical surface and an inner cylindrical surface which together define an annular wedge terminating in a circular edge. A portion of the outer frustoconical surface remote from the circular edge is provided with knurling. In use, the set screw is tightened against a work, such as a shaft or rod, and the circular edge bites into the material. Upon further tightening, the knurling engages the work.
It is therefore the primary object of the present invention to provide a set screw having improved resistance to vibration.
This and many other objects features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art when the following exemplary detailed description of the present invention is read in conjunction with the drawings appended hereto.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGSIn the drawings, wherein like reference numerals refer to like elements throughout:
FIG. 1 depicts a partly cutaway side elevational view of the point or working end of a conventional prior art plain cup-point set screw;
FIG. 2 illustrates a partly cutaway side elevational view of the point of a conventional prior art knurled cup point set screw;
FIG. 3 shows a partly cutaway side elevational view of the point of a conventional prior art counterbored knurled cup-point set screw;
FIG. 4 depicts a partly cutaway side elevational view of the point of a prior art counterbored plain cup-point set screw;
FIG. 5. illustrates a partly cutaway side elevational view of the point of a counterbored knurled cup-point set screw according to the present invention;
FIG. 6 is an enlarged fragementary sectional view of the set screw point of FIG. 5; and
FIG. 7 is a diagramatic elevational view showing the relationship between the point at a cup-point set screw and the peripheral surface of a cylindrical shaft or rod.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTSReferring now to the drawing, and more particularly, to FIGS. 1-4 thereof, prior art setscrews 100, 200, 300 and 400, respectively, are illustrated for comparison with thenovel set screw 500 of the present invention, shown in FIGS. 5 through 7.
FIG. 1 shows a conventional cup-point setscrew 100 having a threadedshank 102 and apoint 104 formed at one end of the shank. Thepoint 104 is designed to bite into the material of the work, such as a shaft or rod (not illustrated) in a manner well known in the art, against which it is tightened. Thepoint 104 resists the loosening effects of vibration, and anchors theset screw 100 to the work. Thepoint 104 is cupped by the provision of acavity 106 forming anannular wedge 108 having a frustoconicalouter surface 110, aninner surface 112 and anedge 114. The cuppedpoint 104 thereby presents theedge 114 of thewedge 108 to the surface of the work to cause it to displace surface material of work when theset screw 100 is used.
FIGS. 2 through 4 show a conventional knurled cup-point setscrew 200, a conventional knurledcounterbored set screw 300, and a prior art plain cup-pointcounterbored set screw 400 having, respectively, threadedshanks 202, 302 and 402,points 204, 304 and 404, andcavities 206, 306 and 406 forming, respectively,wedges 208, 308 and 408 havingouter surfaces 210, 310 and 410,inner surfaces 212, 312 and 412, andedges 214, 314 and 414.
Setscrews 200, and 300 differ fromset screws 100 and 400 in the provision of knurling 216 and 316 on their respectiveouter surfaces 210 and 310; resulting in jaggededges 214 and 314 for engagement with the work. Theset screws 300 and 400 differs fromset screws 100 and 200 in the provision of a counterbore in thecavities 306 and 406, respectively, such that the respectiveinner surfaces 312 and 412 of theset screws 300 and 400 are cylindrical in shape.
As taught by Fesmire, cited above, the plain cuppedpoint 104 and the knurled cup-point 204 described above have limited work-penetrating potential, both theoretically and in practice, because the slopinginner surfaces 112 and 212 will cause undesirable compressive stresses which increase geometrically as penetration advances.
The knurling 216 on theset screw 200 improves the penetration of theedge 214 into the work, as compared to theplain edge 114 of the plain cup point setscrew 100, due to a slight reaming actions of the knurling. However, the compressive stress described above still limits the penetration of the point. The increased holding power of the knurled cup point setscrew 200 over the plain cup point setscrew 100 is primarily due to the elasticity of the work material, which tends to spring into the spaces between the knurls to mechanically interlock thepoint 204 with the work.
The counterbored knurled cup point setscrew 300 was proposed by Fesmire to increase the work penetrating potential of the point by reducing the compressive forces associated with a sloping inner wall and by allowing the knurling to penetrate deeper into the workpiece. The increased penetration resulted in greater vibration resistance both in theory and in practice.
The counterbored plain cup point setscrew 400 was briefly mentioned by Fesmire as an alternative design with the suggestion that it was an improvement over a plain cup point design, but with the implication that the counterbored knurled cup point was superior to a counterbored plain cup. The inventor of the present invention discovered that there were advantages to each of theset screws 300 and 400 which advantages were apparently unrecognized previously.
The inventor confirmed that as predicted, addition of either knurling, as in setscrew 200, or a counterbore as inset screw 400, improved the vibration resistance of a set screw over that provided by a plain-cup standard bore setscrew 100. Furthermore, the addition of the counterbore to a knurled point set screw increased the vibration resistance of the set screw, as compared to a knurled standard bore set screw. The counterbore in the knurled cup point socket set screws showed deeper penetration into mating material than regular knurled cup points, and it develops a vise-like grip on the metal pushed up into the cup. So powerful is this grip that significant tensile force is required to pull a seated screw loose from mating material. The superior vibrational holding power of the counterbored knurled cup point set screw appears to result from the point gripping power and the resistance to rotation of the external knurl.
However, unexpectedly, the inventor of the present invention discovered that the counterbored plain cup-point setscrew 400 has the greatest vibration resistance of these four designs, at least within the range of frequencies tested. The plain cup-point apparently offers less resistance to tightening and permits higher preloads, while the knurling cuts into the surface of the work.
The setscrew 500 of the present invention, illustrated in FIGS. 5 through 7, combines the advantages of theset screws 300 and 400 described above to provide a novel design providing even greater vibration resistance than any of the prior art setscrews 100, 200, 300 and 400.
As shown in FIG. 5, the knurled counterbored cup-point setscrew 500 of the present invention has a threadedshank 502 terminating in apoint 504. Thepoint 504 has acounterbored cavity 506 forming awedge 508 having a frustoconicalouter surface 510, a cylindricalinner surface 512 and acircular edge 514. As shown in FIG. 6, a portion of thefrustoconical surface 510 remote from thecircular edge 514 is provided with knurling 516 having a plurality of circumferentially disposedroots 518 andcrest 520.
The novel setscrew 500 of the present invention differs from the prior art knurled counterbored cup-point setscrew 300 in that theportion 522 of the outer frustoconical surface of the set screw which is adjacent theedge 514 is smooth, rather than knurled. Preferably, theknurling 516 is proportioned such that theroots 518 of the knurling are extended smoothly from thesurface portion 522 of thepoint 504 while thecrests 520 extend radially outwardly from the cone defined by thesurface portion 522.
Furthermore, in the preferred embodiment, thecircular edge 514 defines afirst plane 524 disposed parallel to and spaced from asecond plane 526 defined by the lower most edges of thecrests 520 of theknurling 516. Athird plane 528 is defined by the region of thecavity 506 where the innercylindrical surface 514 ends. In the preferred embodiment, the second and third planes are approximately coplanar. However, depending on the nature of the workpiece and the type of vibration experienced, it may be desirable for the second plane or the third plane to be further from the first plane.
As shown in FIG. 7, when theset screw 500 of the present invention is tightened against thework 530, thecircular edge 514 engages the surface of the work and the leading portion of theannular wedge 508 penetrates smoothly into the work without the reaming action of knurling. After thewedge 508 has penetrated a predetermined distance, the knurl crests 520 engage the work and offer the additional point gripping power described earlier to add to the frictional resistance to the undesirable loosening of theset screw 500.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the above described setscrew 500 provides improved resistance to loosening over prior art set screws sincescrew 500 presents the work with both a counterbored plain cup-point and a knurled surface to resist loosening.
The above comprises a detailed description of the best mode contemplated by the inventor at the time of filing for carrying out the present invention and is offered by way of example and not by way of limitation. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that many modifications and variations may be made to the present invention without departing from the spirit thereof. Such variations and modifications are included within the intended scope of the claims appended hereto.