Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


US3699364A - Acoustic surface wave device having improved transducer structure - Google Patents

Acoustic surface wave device having improved transducer structure
Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3699364A
US3699364AUS150108AUS3699364DAUS3699364AUS 3699364 AUS3699364 AUS 3699364AUS 150108 AUS150108 AUS 150108AUS 3699364D AUS3699364D AUS 3699364DAUS 3699364 AUS3699364 AUS 3699364A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
electrodes
transducer
compensating elements
surface wave
arrays
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US150108A
Inventor
Henry M Gerard
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Raytheon Co
Original Assignee
Hughes Aircraft Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hughes Aircraft CofiledCriticalHughes Aircraft Co
Application grantedgrantedCritical
Publication of US3699364ApublicationCriticalpatent/US3699364A/en
Anticipated expirationlegal-statusCritical
Expired - Lifetimelegal-statusCriticalCurrent

Links

Images

Classifications

Definitions

Landscapes

Abstract

An improved transducer structure of the interdigitated electrode type is disclosed. In many microwave acoustic devices it is necessary to convert rf energy to acoustic surface wave energy and vice versa. When the acoustic medium is a piezoelectric substrate, interdigitated electrode transducers are widely employed. When such transducers are amplitude weighted, acoustic wave phase distortion of a serious nature can occur. Such phase distortion is eliminated by the use of an interdigitated transducer having dummy (i.e. non-active) electrodes disposed in the transducer pattern so as to present a substantially uniform metalization density to the propagating acoustic surface wave.

Description

United States-Patent I Gerard v I [54] ACOUSTIC SURFACE WAVE DEVICE HAVING IMPROVED TRANSDUCER STRUCTURE [72] Inventor: Henry M. Gerard, San Diego, Calif.
[73] 'Assigne'e: Hughes Aircraft Company, Culver City, Calif.
22 Filed: June4, 1971 21 Appl.No.: 150,108
Collins and Hagon, Applying Surface Wave Acoustics,
Electronics, Nov. 10, 1969, pp. 97- 103 Altman, Tapping Microwave Acoustics for Better 7 Primary Examiner-J. V. Truhe Assistant Examiner-B. A. Reynolds Att0rneyW. H. MacAllister, Jr. and Don C. Dennison [57] ABSTRACT An improved transducer structure of the interdigitated electrode type is disclosed. In many microwave acoustic devices it is necessary to convert rf energy to acoustic surface wave energy and vice versa. When the acoustic medium is a piezoelectric substrate, interdigitated electrode transducers are widely employed. When such transducers are amplitude weighted, acoustic wave phase distortion of a serious nature can occur. Such phase distortion is eliminated by the use of an interdigitated transducer having dummy (i.e. non-active) electrodes disposed in the transducer pattern so as to present a substantially uniform metalization density to the propagating acoustic surface wave.
16 Claims, 5 Drawing Figures tion Meons Reflectionless Acoustic Termination Signal Processing, Electronics, Nov. 10, 1969, pp. 94- I PATENTEDum 11 I972 I 3.699.364 sum 1 or 2 0 Fig.5.
Utilization Meuns Reflecfionless Acoustic Termination Reflectionless R. Acou st ic source Termmunon Henry M. Gerard,
INVENTOR.
ATTORN EY.
I ACo sTIC SURFACE wAvE DEVICE HAVING IMPROVED TRANSDUCER STRUCTURE RELATIONTOGOVERNMENT CONTRACT The invention herein described was made in the course of or under a contract or I subcontract thereunder, with the Department of the Army.
FIELD on THE INVENTION This invention relates to acoustic surface wave devices and more specifically to improved electromechanical transducer structures for use with such devices. 1
' DESCRIPTION OF THE PRIOR ART term is not altogether accurate, for it may also include I devices operating below the frequency range of approximately l,000 Ml-Iz which is traditionally regarded as the lower limit of the microwave region.
Because of developments in new materials, widespread interest now exists in microwave acoustic devices wherein the wave energy propagates along the surface of a material much as a ripple on a pond. In fact, if viewed microscopically, the surface of the material supporting these waves would resemble such a pond, completewith wave crests and valleys. One of the great advantages of surface wave devices results from the fact that the surface waves travel much slower than electromagnetic waves in free space. The wavelengths are therefore shorter and components such as delay lines, amplifiers, attenuators, filters, and I couplers of microminiature construction can be utilized to modify and process the surface wave energy.
In its simplest form a surface wave microwave acoustic circuit comprises a source of rf energy, a smooth slab-like element or substrate of material capable of supporting propagating surface waves and a utilization-device. Electromechanical transducers are coupled to the substrate to convert the rf energy to surface waves in the material and vice vers'a. Thus configured, the basic surface wave device is primarily useful as a delay line. Frequently, it is desired to modify the propagating surface wave in a manner such as to enhance the operation of the basic devices and to form new devices having'unique properties.
In general, piezoelectric materials are utilized in fabricating the surface wave substrate. With such substrates, the input and output transducers commonly take the form of arrays of conductive interdigitated electrodes which are bonded to the substrate surface. By properly designing the transducers, it is possible to obtain delay lines which have response characteristics which are functions of delay time and frequency. Because of these'properties, such devices are termed delay line filters, and find use in a broad range of communications and radar systems.
Because of the many advantages enjoyed by delay line filters they are especially attractive for use in modern radar systems. See, for example, the article Surface Wave Delay Lines Promise Filters for Radar, etc. by J. H. Collins and P. J. I-Iagon, Electronics, Jan. 19, 1970 at pp. -122. When used with chirp radar systems, for example, pulse compression and expansion filters can be obtained by utilizing surface wave delay lines with interdigitated electrode transducers having a graded or varying interelectrode spacing.
It is also desirable in many instances to suppress or control filter sidelobe response by varying the transducer interelectrode overlap. The article Surface Wave Device Applications and Component Developments by J. Bumsweig,- E. H. Gregory and R. J. Wagner, IEEE, Journal of Solid State Circuits, Vol.
. SC-5, No. 6, December 1970 at pp. 310-319, for example, illustrates transducerpat terns of triangular and Gaussian shape.
It has been found, however, that device operation is degraded when utilizing transducers having interdigitated electrodes which do not extend completely across the transverse transducer dimension. This degradation is caused by closely nonuniform metalization of such transducer patterns and results from unequal velocities of different portions of the propagating surface wave. The unequal surface wave velocity in turn results in phase distortion which manifests itself as poor filter response characteristics.
It is, therefore, an object of the present invention to improve the response characteristics of electromechanical transducers of the interdigitated electrode type.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide an improved interdigitated transducer structure having a weighted amplitude versus frequency response characteristic.
. It is yet another object of the present invention to improve the response characteristics of surface wave delay line filters.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In accordance with the principles of the present invention, these objects are accomplished by utilizing dummy" elements disposed in the interstices of adjacent active electrodes of an interdigitated electrode transducer. The dummy elements, while being inactive insofar as the transduction process is concerned, provide a more uniform transducer metalization density. The resultant transducer therefore appears substantially homogeneous to the surface wave propagating in the piezoelectric substrate on which the transducer is disposed. Although the transducer appears uniform to the surface wave, its active electrode pattern can be selected for any desired response characteristic.
When the compensated transducers are incorporated in weighted delay line filters, the phase distortion caused by non-uniform surface wave velocities is substantially eliminated. The response characteristics of such filters, therefore, more closely approximate the desired design characteristics.
3 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS The foregoing and other objects and features of the present invention can be more readily understood with reference to the following detailed description taken in conjunction withthe accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate like structural elements and in which! FIG. 1 is asimplified pictorial view of a surface wave delay line filter in accordance with the present invention; FIG. 2 is a plan view of a portion of a filter such as that of FIG. 1 but utilizing a transducer of prior art both with andwithout the compensated interdigitated transducer of the present invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Referring more specifically to the drawings, FIG. 1 is a simplified pictorial view of a surface wave delay line filter. In FIG. 1 an elongated slab or substrate of piezoelectric material is provided with an input trans-' ducer l1 and anoutput transducer 12. A source of rf -energy indicated generally by block 13 is electrically coupled to input transducer 11. Source 13 can also include suitable-electromagnetic tuning elements as are well known in the art. A utilization circuit indicated generally asblock 14 is, in turn, electrically coupled to systems. In a radar receiver, for example, the delay line may be of the dispersive type for pulse compression of a transmitted chirp radar pulse. Although many other uses forthe improved transducer structures of the present invention are known, the embodiments will be described in terms of frequency dispersive delay lines.
In additionto providing a time delay between the V input and output signals which is a function of frequen- I cy it is also frequently desirable to amplitude-weight the filter response characteristic. That is, it is sometimes desirable to design one orboth transducers so theoutput transducer 12. The piezoelectric material I from whichsubstrate 10 is fabricated is of the type suitable for the propagation of acoustic surface waves.
- tended operation they can be employed with greater or lesser success.
Generally, the surface ofsubstrate 10 is ground and polished to an optical quality finish in order to reduce surface imperfections to a minimum. Input andoutput transducers 11 and 12, which will be described in greater detail-hereinbelow, are deposited, bonded or otherwise-mechanically attached to the upper polished surface ofsubstrate 10. Transducers Y11 and 12 can be formed of any suitable electrically conductive material such as aluminum or gold. The thickness of the filtersof the general type depicted in FIG. 1 have a wide variety of uses as a glance at the current microwave literature will reveal. A typical use for a delay line such as thatdepicted in FIG. 1 is in the signal processing portions of pulse compression radar that with 'a given amplitude rf input signal the'amplitude of the delayed rf output signal is a function of frequency.
In order to achieve. both frequency dispersive and frequency 1 dependent amplitude-weighting in such delay linedevices, interdigitated transducer structures such as that shown in FIG. 2 have been suggested. FIG.
2 is a plan view, partially broken away, of the input portion of a device such as shown in FIG. 1. Theinput transducer 21 comprises a pair of interdigitated con ductor patterns bonded to the upper surface ofpiezoelectric substrate 10.Transducer 21 comprises a pair of elongatedconductive pads 22 and 23 which are conveniently connected to the rf source,,not shown, by means ofleads 24 and 25, respectively.
Extending partially across the surface ofsubstrate 10 betweenpads 22 and 23 in the transverse direction are sets of interdigitated conductingelectrodes 26 and 27. As withpads 22 and 23,electrodes 26 and 27 are deposited, bonded or otherwise mechanically attached to the surface ofsubstrate 10. As is known in the art, the spacing x betweenadjacent electrodes 26 and 27 determines the frequency of maximum surface wave excitation. In general, for maximum coupling between the electrical and acoustic wave energy, the spacing x is an integral multiple of an acoustic half-wavelength. The amount of transverse overlap y between adjacent electrodes determines the efficiency of the electromagnetic-to-acoustic transfer, and, therefore, the degree of acoustic coupling.
Due to the variation of transverse electrode overlapy, the maximum weighting for the transducer of FIG. 2
occurs in the longitudinal mid-region of the structure.
This variation in overlap y along the transducer has been termed apodization,- and the resultant structures are known as apodized interdigitated transducers.
In operation, rf energy having frequency components extending over a large range of frequencies is applied to'transducer 21 by means of conductive leads 24 and 25. Due to the relatively large electrode spacing x in the left-hand portion of the transducer, the lower frequency rf energy is converted by means of the piezoelectric effect into mechanicalperturbations or surface waves in the upper surface ofsubstrate 10. The midrange frequency and higher frequency wave energy is similarly converted to propagating surface wave energy in the mid and right-hand regions oftransducer 21, respectively. Due to the bidirectional nature of atransducer 21, a portion of the surface wave energy propagates toward the left where it can be absorbed, if desired, by an absorbing material such as black wax deposited on the upper surface ofsubstrate 10 as shown in FIG. 1. I
higher operating frequencies the electrode mass can affectthe surface wave velocity and give rise to undesirable phase distortion. Furthermore, if the substrate material has a relatively strong electromechanical coupling coefficient such transducer structures can degrade-performance at low as well as high operating frequencies.
More specifically, it has been found that the variation in the amount of metalization of the substrate seen by the surface wave as it propagates beneath the transducer causes velocity variations; that is, 'as the surface wave propagates beneath the region of the transducer its velocity is decreased by the presence of theconductive electrodes 26 and 27. Thus, the surface wave velocity is slower along the longitudinal centerline oftransducer 21 than in the transverse regions near the than at the edges. In general, the velocity change is not only determined by the extent of relative metalization seen by the propagating surface wave, but is also proportional to the square of the effective surface wave electromechanical coupling coefficient referred to above. Since the phase difference between the central and edge regions of the propagating acoustic beam is proportional to velocity and path length, a velocity difference of only a fraction of a percent can result in very large cumulative phase distortions. The equi-phase wavefront of the surface wave launched bytransducer 21 therefore emerges with a curved shape somewhat as indicated bydotted lines 20.
As the distorted surface wave reaches the output transducer it is converted to an rf output signal. However, due to the averaging orintegrating effect of the output transducer, which is designed to accept an undistorted wavefront, the rf output is degraded. If the output transducer is a mirror image of theinput transducer 21, the wavefront of the propagating surface wave energy is even further degraded. Again, this problem is most severe in materials such as LiNbO which exhibit a strong coupling coefficient and is less severe in materials such as quartz which has a relatively low coupling coefficient.
In FIG. 3 there is shown an improved transducer structure in keeping with the present invention which overcomes the above-described problem. The transducer pattern of FIG. 3 is apodized or weighted in the same manner as that shown in FIG. 2. However,dummy elements 26a and 27a have been provided in the interstices of the transducer pattern to provide a substantially uniform metalization density as seen by the propagating acoustic surface wave energy. Dummy elements 260 are disposed betweenactive electrodes 26 anddummy elements 27a are disposed betweenactive electrodes 27.
In FIG. 3dummy elements 26a and 27a are shown as being attached topads 22 and 23, respectively. It is not 'edges because there is more metal along the centerline required, however, that these elements be conductive, or that they be conductively joined to the pads or to each other. What is required is that the dummy elements present substantially the same effective loading to the propagating surface wave as the missing electrode portions.
It is seen thatdummy elements 26a and 27a are inactive insofar as the transduction mechanism is concemed since they are at the same potential as their immediatelyadjacent electrodes 26 and 27, respectively. Their presence, however, provides a substantially uniform metalization density to surface wave energy, thus eliminating the differential surface wave velocity problem of the transducer structure of FIG. 2. The portions of the surface wave energy near the edges of the.
transducer see substantially the same amount of overlying metalization as the central portions. The acoustic velocity is therefore substantially uniform for the entire wavefront and the emerging wavefront is linear as indicated bydotted lines 30.
Although the most convenient method of fabricating the compensated transducer of FIG. 3 is with the use of the same conductive material for the active electrodes and the dummy elements, it is a matter of design choice. The dummy elements can be formed of a different material, either conductive or nonconductive. If a different material is used, however, the width or thickness of the dummy elements may have to be changed from that of the active electrodes in order to compensate for the difference in effective surface wave loading of the different materials.
In FIG. 4 there is shown a plan view of another embodiment of the present invention. The device of FIG. 4 represents a typical weighted pulse compression filter. The filter of FIG. 4 comprises apiezoelectric substrate 40 having a relatively broadband unweighted interdigitatedinput transducer 41 disposed on the upper surface thereof. The output transducer 42 comprisesconductive pads 43 and 44 with transversely extendingelectrodes 45 and 46. Theactive electrodes 46 are is required.Dummy elements 45a are disposed in the interstices betweenactive electrodes 45 and are conductively attached to pad 43.
In operation, broadband rf energy applied to inputtransducer 41 is converted to surface wave energy, a portion of which propagates axially along the surface in the direction of output transducer 42. This surface wave energy is reconverted to rf energy of the output transducer 42 and extracted therefrom by means of conductive leads 47 and 48. By virtue of the narrower electrode spacing in the left-hand region of the output transducer 42, the high frequency energy undergoes the least time delay. The low frequency energy, on the other hand, undergoes the greatest time delay. Also, since the transducer is weighted, the mid-frequency response of the transducer is greatest and tapers off for both the high and low frequencies. Phase distortion arising from the differential surface wave velocity in output transducer 42 is minimized by the inclusion ofdummy elements 45a.
FIG. is a graphical representation of the insertion loss versus frequency characteristics of pulse compression filters similar to that of FIG. 4. The experimental Hamming weighted response curve as indicated bybroken line 50 centered about at mid-band frequency f,,. As can be seen, the insertion loss for the uncompensated transducer departs substantially from the ideal response and is, in fact, unsuitable.
Curve 53 represents the insertion loss characteristic for a similarly weighted filter but with a compensated output transducer of the type illustrated in FIG. 3. As is readily seen, the insertion loss characteristic with the improved 'transducer of 'the present invention corresponds closely with theidealized design curve 50.
In all cases it is understood that the above-described embodiments are merely illustrative of but a small number of the many possible specific embodiments which can represent applications of the principles of the present invention. Numerous and varied other arrangements can be readily devised in accordance with these principles by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
What isclaim'ed is:
,1. An acoustic surface wave'device comprising, in combination:
a piezoelectric substrate capable of supporting propagating acoustic surface wave energy;
at least one electromechanical transducer coupled to a surface of said substrate at a first region thereof; said transducer comprising a plurality of substantially parallel spaced-apart conductive electrodes,
alternate ones of which are conductively connected to form two interdigitated electrode arrays, the transverse overlap between adjacent electrodes varying along the longitudinal direction of said arrays; and
compensating elements disposed in the interstices of the array electrodes in the non-overlapping regions thereof.
2. The device according to claim 1 wherein said compensating elements are electrically nonconductive.
3. The device according to claim 1 wherein said compensatin g elements are electrically conductive.
4. The device according to claim 3 wherein said compensating elements are conductively coupled to the array electrodes longitudinally adjacent thereto.
5. An acoustic surface wave device comprising, in combination:
a piezoelectric substrate capable of supporting a first plurality of longitudinally spaced electrodes extending transversely between said conductive a irst en of alternate ones of said electrodes being conductively connected to one of said conductive members to form first and second arrays of interdigitated electrodes, a portion of the electrode members of at least one of said arrays having apodized second ends; and e a plurality of compensating elements disposed in the interstices between the electrodes of said arrays in the regions of said apodization.
l 6. The device according to claim 5 wherein said compensating elements areelectrically nonconductive.
7. The device according to claim 5 wherein said compensating elements are electrically conductive.
8. The device according to claim 7- wherein said com-. pensating elements are conductively coupled to the array electrodes longitudinally adjacent thereto.
9. An electromechanical transducer for an'acoustic surface wave device comprising, in combination:
a pair of elongated spaced apart conductive members,
a first plurality of longitudinally-spaced electrodes extending transversely between said conductive members;
a first end of alternate ones of said electrodes being conductively connected to one of said conductive members to form first and second arrays of interdigitated electrodes, aportion of the electrodes of at least one of said arrays having apodized second ends; and
a plurality of compensating elements disposed in the interstices between the electrodes of said arrays in the regions of said apodization.
10. The transducer according to claim 9 wherein said compensating elements are electrically nonconductive.
1 1. The transducer according to claim 9 wherein said compensating elements are electrically conductive.
12. The transducer according to claim 11 wherein said compensating elements are conductively coupled to the array electrodes longitudinally adverse thereto.
13. An electromechanical transducer for an acoustic surface wave device comprising, in combination:
a plurality of substantially parallel spaced-apart conductive electrodes, alternate ones of which are conductively connected to form two interdigitated electrode arrays, the transverse overlap between adjacent electrodes varying along the longitudinal direction of said arrays; and
compensating elements disposed in the interstices of the array electrodes in the nonoverlapping regions thereof. I
14. The transducer according to claim 13 wherein said compensating elements are electrically nonconductive.
15. The transducer according to claim 13 wherein said compensating elements are electrically conductive'.
16. The transducer according to claim 15 wherein said compensating elements are conductively coupled to the array electrodes longitudinally adverse thereto.

Claims (16)

5. An acoustic surface wave device comprising, in combination: a piezoelectric substrate capable of supporting propagating acoustic surface waVe energy; at least one electromechanical transducer coupled to a surface of said substrate at a first region thereof; said transducer comprising a pair of elongated spaced-apart conductive members; a first plurality of longitudinally spaced electrodes extending transversely between said conductive members; a first end of alternate ones of said electrodes being conductively connected to one of said conductive members to form first and second arrays of interdigitated electrodes, a portion of the electrode members of at least one of said arrays having apodized second ends; and a plurality of compensating elements disposed in the interstices between the electrodes of said arrays in the regions of said apodization.
US150108A1971-06-041971-06-04Acoustic surface wave device having improved transducer structureExpired - LifetimeUS3699364A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application NumberPriority DateFiling DateTitle
US15010871A1971-06-041971-06-04

Publications (1)

Publication NumberPublication Date
US3699364Atrue US3699364A (en)1972-10-17

Family

ID=22533151

Family Applications (1)

Application NumberTitlePriority DateFiling Date
US150108AExpired - LifetimeUS3699364A (en)1971-06-041971-06-04Acoustic surface wave device having improved transducer structure

Country Status (1)

CountryLink
US (1)US3699364A (en)

Cited By (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
US3781721A (en)*1972-11-301973-12-25Hughes Aircraft CoAcoustic surface wave device eliminating spurious end reflections
US3813618A (en)*1971-07-161974-05-28Thomson CsfSurface wave electromechanical filter
DE2435835A1 (en)*1973-08-031975-03-13Philips Nv ACOUSTIC SURFACE WAVE ARRANGEMENT
US4005378A (en)*1975-11-251977-01-25The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air ForceSurface acoustic wave filter
US4007433A (en)*1974-07-151977-02-08Nippon Telegraph And Telephone Public CorporationElastic surface wave filter
US4023124A (en)*1974-08-021977-05-10U.S. Philips CorporationAcoustic surface wave devices
US4030050A (en)*1974-09-261977-06-14Plessey Handel Und Investments A.G.Acoustic surface wave filters
DE2820046A1 (en)*1977-05-091978-11-16Murata Manufacturing Co ACOUSTIC SURFACE WAVE COMPONENT
US4144508A (en)*1976-07-291979-03-13Plessey Handel Und Investments AgSurface acoustic wave filters
US4205280A (en)*1978-08-181980-05-27Zenith Radio CorporationSurface wave device with suppressed boundary-reflected waves
DE3038056A1 (en)*1979-10-081981-04-16Toko, Inc., Tokyo ACOUSTIC SURFACE WAVE DEVICE
US4346322A (en)*1979-03-221982-08-24Tokyo Shibaura Denki Kabushiki KaishaElastic surface wave device
US4473888A (en)*1981-10-281984-09-25The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The ArmySaw monolithic convolver using dispersive transducers
US4857870A (en)*1985-12-041989-08-15Thomson-CsfMethod of manufacturing a surface wave dispersive filter and a filter manufactured in accordance with this method
US5019742A (en)*1986-03-121991-05-28Northern Telecom LimitedSaw device with apodized IDT
US5777419A (en)*1995-08-151998-07-07Motorola Inc.Surface acoustic wave device with minimized bulk scattering
US20040247153A1 (en)*2001-07-242004-12-09Werner RuileConverter for surface waves with improved suppression of interfering excitation
US20060158061A1 (en)*2003-03-032006-07-20Markus HauserElectroacoustic transducer for a surface wave operating component
US20150382110A9 (en)*2013-03-142015-12-31Lewis AthanasAcoustic Transducer and Method for Driving Same

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
US3581248A (en)*1969-03-261971-05-25Zenith Radio CorpAcoustic filters
US3600710A (en)*1968-08-121971-08-17Zenith Radio CorpAcoustic surface wave filter

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
US3600710A (en)*1968-08-121971-08-17Zenith Radio CorpAcoustic surface wave filter
US3581248A (en)*1969-03-261971-05-25Zenith Radio CorpAcoustic filters

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Altman, Tapping Microwave Acoustics for Better Signal Processing, Electronics, Nov. 10, 1969, pp. 94 96*
Collins and Hagon, Applying Surface Wave Acoustics, Electronics, Nov. 10, 1969, pp. 97 103*

Cited By (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
US3813618A (en)*1971-07-161974-05-28Thomson CsfSurface wave electromechanical filter
US3781721A (en)*1972-11-301973-12-25Hughes Aircraft CoAcoustic surface wave device eliminating spurious end reflections
DE2435835A1 (en)*1973-08-031975-03-13Philips Nv ACOUSTIC SURFACE WAVE ARRANGEMENT
US3968460A (en)*1973-08-031976-07-06U.S. Philips CorporationAcoustic surface-wave devices
US4007433A (en)*1974-07-151977-02-08Nippon Telegraph And Telephone Public CorporationElastic surface wave filter
US4023124A (en)*1974-08-021977-05-10U.S. Philips CorporationAcoustic surface wave devices
US4030050A (en)*1974-09-261977-06-14Plessey Handel Und Investments A.G.Acoustic surface wave filters
US4005378A (en)*1975-11-251977-01-25The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air ForceSurface acoustic wave filter
US4144508A (en)*1976-07-291979-03-13Plessey Handel Und Investments AgSurface acoustic wave filters
DE2820046A1 (en)*1977-05-091978-11-16Murata Manufacturing Co ACOUSTIC SURFACE WAVE COMPONENT
US4205280A (en)*1978-08-181980-05-27Zenith Radio CorporationSurface wave device with suppressed boundary-reflected waves
US4346322A (en)*1979-03-221982-08-24Tokyo Shibaura Denki Kabushiki KaishaElastic surface wave device
DE3038056A1 (en)*1979-10-081981-04-16Toko, Inc., Tokyo ACOUSTIC SURFACE WAVE DEVICE
US4473888A (en)*1981-10-281984-09-25The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The ArmySaw monolithic convolver using dispersive transducers
US4857870A (en)*1985-12-041989-08-15Thomson-CsfMethod of manufacturing a surface wave dispersive filter and a filter manufactured in accordance with this method
US5019742A (en)*1986-03-121991-05-28Northern Telecom LimitedSaw device with apodized IDT
US5777419A (en)*1995-08-151998-07-07Motorola Inc.Surface acoustic wave device with minimized bulk scattering
US20040247153A1 (en)*2001-07-242004-12-09Werner RuileConverter for surface waves with improved suppression of interfering excitation
US7170372B2 (en)*2001-07-242007-01-30Epcos AgConverter for surface waves with improved suppression of interfering excitation
US20060158061A1 (en)*2003-03-032006-07-20Markus HauserElectroacoustic transducer for a surface wave operating component
US7449812B2 (en)*2003-03-032008-11-11Epcos AgElectroacoustic transducer for a surface wave operating component
US20150382110A9 (en)*2013-03-142015-12-31Lewis AthanasAcoustic Transducer and Method for Driving Same

Similar Documents

PublicationPublication DateTitle
US3699364A (en)Acoustic surface wave device having improved transducer structure
US3753164A (en)Acoustic surface wave filter
US3883831A (en)Surface wave devices
US3836876A (en)Acoustic surface wave devices
US3688223A (en)Electromechanical filters comprising input-output interdigital electrodes having differing amplitude and frequency characteristics
US4910839A (en)Method of making a single phase unidirectional surface acoustic wave transducer
US3980904A (en)Elastic surface wave device
US4448805A (en)Methods of producing devices comprising metallized regions on dielectric substrates
US3686518A (en)Unidirectional surface wave transducers
US3760299A (en)Acoustic surface wave-apparatus having dielectric material separating transducer from acoustic medium
US3818379A (en)Acoustic surface wave device
US3387233A (en)Signal dispersion system
US3827002A (en)Tunable electroacoustic transducers
EP0026114B1 (en)Surface acoustic wave device
US3736532A (en)Ultrasonic delay lines
US4434383A (en)Temperature stable surface acoustic wave device
US3686579A (en)Solid-state, acoustic-wave amplifiers
US4395686A (en)Attenuation of higher order width modes in magnetostatic wave devices
US3582834A (en)Microwave ultrasonic delay line
CA2034392A1 (en)Electrode structure with constant velocity and predetermined reflectivity
US4575696A (en)Method for using interdigital surface wave transducer to generate unidirectionally propagating surface wave
US3803520A (en)Acoustic surface wave device with improved transducer
US3697899A (en)Acoustic surface wave transmission device
US3611203A (en)Integrated digital transducer for variable microwave delay line
GB2123637A (en)Surface acoustic wave device

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp