US3009311A - Elastic yarn - Google Patents

Description

Nov'. 21, 1961 KUNG-CHu-l WANG ELASTIC YARN 2 Sheets-Sheet 2 Filed March 13, 1957 taes arent 3,009,311 ELASTIC YARN Kung-chih Wang, Mishawaka, Ind., assigner to United States Rubber Company, New York, NX., a corporation of New .Hersey Filed Mar. 13, 1957, Ser. No. 645,721 2 Claims. (Cl. 57-152) This invention relates to an improved single cover elastic yarn.

Single cover elastic yarns comprising a twisted rubber thread and a covering yarn or roving helically wrapped around the rubber thread have been produced for many years in accordance with the teachings of the Foster Patents 2,024,155 and 2,024,156 granted December 17, 1935. These yarns have been manufactured and used extensively, but they have not been used in all cornmercial fields where elastic yarns are used. For example, the yarns of this type which are produced commercially generally have an elongation falling in the limited range of from 120 to 160% elongation. These yarns generally are used only to produce low modulus, soft hand woven elastic fabrics such, for example, as the fabrics used in bathing suits.

Double cover elastic yarns consisting of an untwisted rubber thread having two yarns wrapped therearound in opposite directions have been manufactured and used widely for many years. Yarns of this type manufactured commercially have elongations falling in the range of from about 100 to 400% elongation, and they are made having either a high or a low modulus, as desired. Since these double covered yarns can be made to have either a high or a low elongation, or a high or a low modulus, as desired, the commercial applications in which they are used have not been limited as has the commercial applications for single cover yarns.

Elastic yarns of this general type, that is yarns comprising an elastic core, either twisted or untwisted and a fibrous cover sheating this core, either single or double, may be classified according to their elongations. Yarn with an elongation in the range of 100% or slightly greater is considered a low elongation yarn, and yarn with an elongation of approximately 400% or slightly less is considered a high elongation yarn. Yarn having an elongation of approximately 200% would be classified as an intermediate elongation yarn. Commercially the broad loom (weaving) trade uses large quantities of low elongation yarn, that is yarns having from 1GO-140% elongation, with a peak in the quantities of the yarns used falling at approximately 120% elongation; the knitting trade uses large quantities of intermediate elongation yarns, that is yarns having an elongation from about M30-220% elongation, with a peak in the quantities of yarns used falling at approximately 200% elongation; and the hosiery trade uses large quantities of yarns having a high elongation, that is yarns with an elongation from about 300-400% with a peak in the quantity of the yarns used falling at approximately 350% elongation.

in accordance with this invention balanced, well covered, single cover elastic yarns can be produced having an elongation falling anywhere in the expanded range of from about 115% to 350%, as desired. Consequently the new yarns will iind applications in commercial fields the old single cover type yarns could not enter.

Furthermore, the new yarns are better covered than the old single cover type yarns. Although the single cover elastic yarns produced prior to this invention appeared to be well covered when viewed in their relaxed state, if the yarns were elongated it was found that ultimately the rubber thread would be displaced from the center of the yarn to the outside of the yarn, and the fibrous cover in turn would assume a central position. ln this state the core had in fact reached or approached the condition of a cover which was helically wrapped about the fibrous element, and ythe latter, which was the cover, had approached a central location in the yarn as a core. This phenomenon is apparent to the eye under magnification, and it is apparent to the touch, for the yarn when elongated can be felt to have a greater drag or frictional force on the iingers if they are slid along the yarn, than when the yarn is relaxed, due to the presence of the rubber thread on the external surface of the stretched yarn.

lt is a further object of this invention to provide a balanced, well covered, single cover elastic yarn in which the core is more nearly retained as a core, and the cover is more nearly retained as a cover on the core when the yarn is stretched to the extent anticipated in its use.

rl`hese objects are achieved by providing a balanced, well covered, single cover elastic yarn in which the ratio of the breaking length of core in a unit length of yarn divided by the length of cover in that given length of yarn falls below approximately 1.50 and preferably falls in the range from approximately 1.0 to approximately 1.50.

There is disclosed herein an improved method and apparatus for producing the new single cover elastic yarns.

In accordance with the method a twisted core and a fibrous covering strand are advanced to a covering point, and the fibrous covering is wrapped around the core in a manner such that the breaking length of the core in a given length of relaxed yarn divided by the length of cover in this given length of relaxed yarn falls in the range of approximately 1.0 to 1.50.

In a preferred embodiment of the method, the new yarn is produced by advancing the cover to the covering point through apparatus which grips the cover immediately prior to its reaching the covering point. A pretwisted, stretched core is advanced to this covering point, and immediately prior to reaching the covering point, the core is confined generally to a position adjacent the covering yarn, but the core is not gripped tightly at this point. This latter feature is an important feature of the method in accordance with this invention.

The apparatus may be the conventional spinning or twisting frame used heretofore to produce single cover elastic yarn but in which the frame has been modified in a manner which be pointed out hereinafter. As is well-known, when a single cover elastic yarn is produced on these conventional frames, a rubber thread is firstpretw-isted. This twisted rubber core is then advanced at a controlled rate to the covering point.

ln the apparatus heretofore, the core was advanced from a driven braked let-off package to and through a pair of nip rolls which were either the front draft rolls of a spinning frame, or the nip rolls of a twisting frame. The covering strand was also advanced through the nip of these rolls, and immediately after the rubber thread and covering strand left the nip rolls, the cover was wrapped about the core by t-he action of a traveller and a rotating spindle. In this earlier apparatus, the core was gripped by this pair of rolls, and was advanced thereby with the covering strand. Contrary to this practice, in accordance with the preferred embodiment of the apparatus of Jthis invention although the core passes between this pair of rolls, the rolls are constructed so the core is not gripped in the nip of the rolls. Because of this arrangement, the rate of core feed is independent of the rate of cover feed to the covening point. In accordance with this invention, the rate of core feed, and the extent to which the core is stretched between the core supply package and the yarn take-up spindle, is controlled primarily only by the yarn take-up spindle and the core letott.

This is an important feature and contributes to the successful operation of the covering apparatus. Heretofore, the rate at which the core could be fed through these nip rolls was limited. If an attempt be made to run these nip rolls as used in the prior practice too. fast, relative to the rate of delivery of core from the let-oirr package, the core would be stretched excessively between the let-ott package and these nip rolls, and breakage of the core would occur in operations. Such excessive breakage does not occur when using the apparatus disclosed herein.

For a better understanding of the nature of this invention, reference should be had to the following detailed description of specific embodiments, when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:

PIG. 1 is a schematic view illustrating apparatus for twisting rubber threads;

FIG. 2 is a schematic view illustrating apparatus for producing single cover elastic yarn by a spinning process;

FIG. 3 is a schematic view illustrating apparatus for producing single cover elastic yarn by the twisting process;

FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view through the nip rolls showing their construction, and showing the relation of the core `and covering strand;

FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of a modified nip roll that may be used in making the yarn of this invention;

FIG. 6 is a view of three yarns in the relaxed state, and

FIG. 7 is a view of the yarns of FIG. 6, but showing these yarns in the stretched condition.

Referring now to the drawings, there is illustrated in FIG. 1 a conventional upstroke twister that may be used to pretwist the rubber core for the single cover elastic yarn of this invention. The upstroke twister comprises a rotatingtwister spindle 10 carrying a package 11 of rubber thread. The rubber thread R advances from the package 11 in a balloon caused by rotation of thespindle 10 to apigtail guide 12 and then through a pair ofnip rolls 13, 14. Between the package 11 and thenip rolls 13, 14 the rubber thread is twisted. From thenip rolls 13, 14 the rubber thread is lled to a take-up spool 15 to be wound thereon for use in the covering process. The take-up spool 15 is driven by the customary take-up roll 16 usually having a cork cover which runs in contact with the rubber thread on thespool 15 to rotate this spool. As is well-known, the rotational speed of thetakeup roll 16 yand thenip rolls 13, 14 are adjusted to wind the rubber thread R on thespool 15 under the desired tension.

The yapparatus described for twisting the core could, if desired, be incorporated with the covering apparatus to form a single step process.

In FIG. 2 there is illustrated spinning apparatus for covering the twisted elastic core, such as rubber thread, to produce the elastic yarn in accordance with this invention. The apparatus illustrated in FIG. 2 is conventional, but for the front draft rolls which will be described in detail hereinafter. As shown, this spinning apparatus comprises the rubber core let-offspool 15, which has been transferred to the spinning apparatus from the twisting apparatus of FIG. l. A let-olf roll 17, having the usual cork cover running in contact with the rubber thread on thespool 15, has its rotational speed regulated to control the rotation of thespool 15 `and thereby to control the speed at which the rubber thread R is let off from thespool 15. This in turn controls the degree to which the rubber thread R -is stretched as it leaves thepackage 15. In the apparatus shown, the rubber thread R then `is led between the front draft rolls 50, 18 to the customary pigtail 19.

Roving 27 from thepackages 20, 21 is led to the rear pair ofdrafting rolls 23, 24. As the roving passes through the successive pairs ofdraft rolls 23, 24; 25, 26,

and 5t), 18 it is attenuated in the customary manner. AS the roving 27 emerges from the front draft rells 5G, 18 with the rubber thread R, it is wrapped about the rubber thread as a ibrous covering sheath adjacent the rolls 50, 1S after it has travelled a short distance, typically less than one inch, eg., 3/4, from the front rolls. The covered rubber thread then passes through the pigtail 19 to thetraveler 28 on thering 29 to be wound on therotating bobbin 30. As is customary in the twisting and spinning methods of producing single cover elastic yarn, thebobbin 39 is rotated to wrap the cover about the core in a direction opposite to the twist in the pre-twisted core R, and consequently to remove some of the twist in the rubber core R during the wrapping operation.

Referring next to FIG. 3 there is shown apparatus for producing single cover elastic yarn in accordance with this invention by the twisting method. In the twisting method, the core is covered with a yarn rather than a roving. In the apparatus illustrated in FIG. 3` the rubber core let-off package 15', controlled by the let-olf roll 17 supplies the rubber thread R under tension. The rubber thread R advances from the let'oil package 15' through a pair of nip rolls 31, 32 to apigtail guide 33.

Covering yarns Y are supplied frompackages 34, 35 aboutguides 36, 37. The yarns Y advance to the nip rolls 31, 32 to pass therebetween. As the rubber thread R and the yarns Y leave the nip rolls 31, 32 the yarns Y are wrapped about the twisted rubber core to produce the single cover elastic yarn in accordance with this invention. The single cover elastic yarn then advances through thepigtail 33 to thetraveler 38 on thering 39 to be wrapped on the rotating bobbin 4t). As is customary in this method of producing single cover elastic yarn, the apparatus is operated to wrap the covering yarns Y about the rubber thread R in a direction opposite to the twist of the rubber thread R, and during this covering operation a portion of the twist is removed from the rubber thread R.

Referring now to FIG. 4 there is shown one embodiment of the modified nip rolls used in the apparatus. These are the nip rolls to be used at 50, 18 of the spinning frame illustrated in FIG. 2, and at 31, 32 of the twisting apparatus illustrated in FIG. 3. As shown, these rolls compriseshafts 41, 41' that carry thesleeves 42, 42' fixed thereto. There is Wrapped about thesleeves 42, 42', thecots 43, 43 of the usual resilient material such as rubber. These rolls are so positioned that the coveringstrand 51, either the roving 27 or the yarns Y will be gripped in the nip of these rolls as shown to be advanced to the covering point as the rolls are rotated.

In the apparatus at least one of these rolls is constructed so that the rubber thread R may be led between the rolls yet it will not be gripped by the rolls. In the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 4, a portion of thecot 43 has been cut away, and a groovedpulley 44 has been mounted on thesleeve 4 so that the rubber thread R may be led through the two rollers in the groove of thepulley 44, and the rubber thread is not gripped in the nip of the rolls.

An important feature of the apparatus is that the apparatus is constructed and arranged so that the advancing twisted rubber thread R and the covering material may be confined adjacent the covering point in close proximity to each other, yet the rubber thread R is not gripped at point where it is confined.

Referring next to FIG. 5 there is shown a further modied embodiment of one of the pair of nip rolls adapted to permit the rubber thread R to pass through the nip of the rolls without being gripped thereby. This roll comprises theshaft 41, carrying thesleeve 42" which has thecot 43 Wrapped thereabout. As in the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 4, a portion of thecot 43 is cut away and adisk 45, in place of thepulley 44, is carried by thesleeve 42 in this cut away portion. As shown thisdisk 45 has one surface tapered toward the adjacent eX- tremity of theshaft 41" to provide a recessed bearing 5. surface on which `the rubber thread R may rest without being gripped in the nip of the rollers. Conveniently the rubber thread is led to thedisk 45 in such a direction as to hold the thread against thedisk 45 and away from the 6 strand in the cover. In such case this length is the length of any one of these strands.

The most significant data in the foregoing table is item G (item E divided by item F).

end ofshaft 41". 5 In the foregoing examples, this ratio in all examples The use of apulley 44 ordisk 45 having a smooth, yet With the exception of Examples 3, 6, 11 and 14 will be tough abrasion resistant surface, has been found benelicial seen to fall below approximately 1.5, and specifically in in advancing the delicate rubber thread Without unduly the range from approximately 1.0 to 1.50. Items 11 and chating it. Advantageously the pulley or disk may lbe I4 will be found to be greatly in excess of this range, formed of nylon. However for some operations it may and they constitute single cover elastic yarns of the prior not be necessary to use such a device, and in that case art and not in accordance with this invention. Items 3 the pulley or disk may be dispensed with. and `6 will be seen to fall slightly above the upper limit To produce a yarn in accordance with this invention, of the invention. These yarns were made using the apthe rate of core let-off is regulated relative tothe rate of paratus of this invention but they were made in such covering delivery to the covering point by the nip rolls 15 a way that they did not possess the advantages of a yarn as follows. The rates of delivery are adjusted to advance in accordance with this invention; in general they are suilicient core and cover to the covering point so that the unsatisfactory. ratio of (a) the breaking length of core in a unit length Although as the ratio changes within the range of 1.0 of yarn divided by (b) the length of a cover strand in to approximately 1.50, the characteristics of the yarns that unit length of yarn falls below approximately 1.50 alter. As the ratio passes the limit of approximately 1.50 and preferably in the range of from about 1.0 to 1.50. the core commences to move to the loutside at the stretched The following speciiic embodiments of single cover condition of thc yarn, and above this limit of approxielastic yarns, some of which are produced in accordance mately 1.50, the yarn is commercially considered to have with this invention, show the structural characteristics the defects of the single cover elastic yarn of the prior art. of the yarns of this invention. In consideriny the data in Other significant comparisons can be made. For exthese tables it is to lbe noted that the data were compiled ample, comparing constructions 1 and 2 with construcfrom measurements on foot lengths or on a fraction of a tion I1, it will be noted that constructions 1, 2 and 11 pound of the elastic yarn, and consequently any slight have approximately the same length of cover per foot of error in measurement thereof may have been multiplied yarn and approximately the same elongation. Yet it will in the iigures given in the tables. Nevertheless, the data 3() be noted that construction Il requires approximately 50% are accurate within the tolerances recognized in the trade. more core per foot of yarn than constructions 1 and 2.

Item 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 A. Turns of cover in 1 foot of relaxed elastic yem. 640 539 605 743 1,042 1,175 612 1,360 1,366 1,240 510 (1) (i) (1) B. Residualtwistincorefrom 1 foot of relaxed elastic yam 512 501 259 496 343 319 276 289 401 230 281 552 608 438 C. Inches of core in 1 foot of relaxed elastic yarn (core net snmnkinwater) 6.5 6.3 9.6 6.7 9.5 10.5 9.7 10.5 9.8 3.9 9.7 6.4 6.2 8.1 D. Breaking elongation of core with residual twist (percent) 480 503 507 507 510 543 513 607 673 673 527 513 523 697 E. Breaking length of core from 1 foot of relaxed elastic yarn (inches) 37.7 38.0 68.9 40.7 53.0 67.4 59.5 74.2 75.8 68.8 60.8 39.2 38.6 64.6 F. Inches cover per foot of relexed elastic yarn.. 29 30 34.9 36 39 40.5 44.3 53 55.3 60 29.5 29.6 29.5 29.2 G. Breaking length 0f core divided by inches of cover (each per unit length of relaxed elastic yarn) 1.30 1.27 1.69 1.13 1.49 1.66 1.34 1.40 1.37 1.15 2.06 1.32 1.30 2.22 H. Elongation of yarn-hand (percent) 120 120 175 165 250 255 260 320 33o 350 140 140 105 140 I. Covcr 22-36/1 2-36/1 22-36 33-36/1 41-40/1 41-40/1 22-36 4 1-40 41-70/1 a1-36/1 22-36/1 I52-6 S1-2 62-2 J. Core size 75's 75s 75's 75s 90s l00s 75s loos 100s 75s 75s 75's 75's 75s 1 Roving cover. 2 Reverse twist cotton. 3 Regular twist cotton. 4 Nylon. 5 Hank 109B (du Pont synthetic fiber of the viscose type). 0 Hank cotton.

Item D is the length of the core at break (item E) Because of this excess of core the cover in construction 11 less the relaxed length of the core when the bare core is assumes a central position as a core, when the yarn is completely relaxed but possesses the residual twist (item stretched, and the core is pushed to the outside as a wrap C), divided by the relaxed length of the core (item C) about the cover. Similar comparison might be made oemultiplied by 100.tween constructions 3 and 4, between constructions 6 and Residual twist in item B is the twist retained by the 7 and betweenconstructions 12 and 114. core in the covered elastic yarn. Referring now t0 FIGS. 6 and 7 significant differences Item F was measured in the samples having a yarn between the yarn in accordance with this invention and cover (sample 1-11) by removing the cover from the clore 65 the yarn produced heretofore will become apparent. In and measuring its length. In the samples having aroving these figures, yarn A designates a double cover elastic cover (l2-14) item F was calculated by determining the yarn produced heretofore. As will be seen by comparing length of cover delivered by the front delivery rolls on FIGS. 6 and 7, this yarn remains well covered in the the covering machine to that length of elastic yarn, beelongated condition. cause of the difficulty in removing and measuring the Yarn C is a single cover yarn constructed as heretolength of a roving, which has little twist, from the core. fore. 'It will be seen that this yarn appears to be well rIhe inches cover per foot of relaxed yarn is the length covered in FIG. 7, yet when it is stretched the rubber core of a single covering strand in this length of yarn; of comes to the outside of the yarn as a wrap at points course if desired the single cover elastic yarn can be such aspoint 52. Yarn B is a yarn constructed in acproduced, as shown in FIG. 2, using more than one cordance with this invention. By comparing FIGS. 6

and 7, it will be seen that the yarn remains Well covered even when elongated. The most signicant comparison which should be made is a comparison of yarns B and C in FIG. 7 in the stretched condition.

Apart from the advantages in material saving in the new yarn, which are apparent from the foregoing, the new am possesses other rnost significant advantages. For

example, assuming the same type and length of cover in both the new and the old yarn and the Sarne elongation, the new yarn has a higher modulus because the core in the new yarn is at a greater stretched condition than in the old yarn. Further, since the core is retained as a core in the new yarn, a fabric made therefrom can be dyed better than a fabric made from the old yarn, because the rubber at the surface of the old yarn does not take the dye and hence gives the fabric a speckled appearance. Furthermore when these yarns are knitted or woven they are generally stretched; in the old yarn the core at the surface was not protected by the cover, hence it was chafed in the loom or knitting machine and damaged.

Having thus described my invention, what I claim and desire to protect by Letters Patent is:

1. A well covered, balanced, single cover elastic yarn having an elongation of at least 100%, comprising a twisted elastic core and a brous covering strand wrapped about said core, the ratio lof the breaking length of core per unit length of covered yarn divided by the length of any given cover strand per unit length of covered yarn, being less than 1.50.

2. A single cover elastic yarn comprising a twisted rubber core, a brous strand wrapped about said core, said covered yarn being balanced and well covered and having an elongation in the range of 11S-350%, the ratio of the breaking length of the rubber core per unit length of covered relaxed yarn divided by the length of cover strand per unit length of relaxed yarn being in the range of from 1.0 to 1.50.

References Cited in the tile of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,024,155 Foster Dec. 17, 1935 2,139,320 Foster Dec. 6, 1938 2,210,883 Chittenden et al. Aug. 13, 1940 2,263,614 Cote Nov. 25, 1941 2,488,941 Schneller Nov. 22, 1949 FOREIGN PATENTS 90,419 Germany Feb. 17, 1897 707,116 Germany May 8, 1941 546,895 Great Britain Aug. 4, 1942

Images