US20220323154A1 - Patient-specific arthroplasty system - Google Patents

Abstract

A patient-specific arthroplasty system comprising a database comprising preoperative data, ligament balancing tool data, and postoperative data associated with a plurality of patients, a preoperative evaluation module that receives preoperative data for a given patient, an analysis engine that analyzes the database, receives the preoperative data, and generates a surgical recommendation based on the preoperative data of the given patient and the analysis of the database, and a pin positioning block module that receives the surgical recommendation and determines a pin positioning block based on the surgical recommendation.

Description

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
• A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material, which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
• This application claims the priority of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/880,955, entitled “DYNAMIC LIGAMENT BALANCING SYSTEM WITH PIN POSITIONING BLOCK,” filed on Jan. 26, 2018, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTIONField of the Invention
• This application generally relates to soft tissue testing systems, and in particular, apparatus and methods for measuring tension, pressure and distance in the soft tissue of a patient's knee in connection with endoprosthetic surgery.
Description of the Related Art
• The knee is very stable and can reach up to one and a half short-term ton load, and it is a commonly injured joint for athletes. However, knee problems can occur at almost all ages even if injury though sports are avoided. In addition to acute damage due to sports-related overloads such as ligament tears, meniscus injuries, or knee-disk dislocations, may also occur. Risk factors such as overweight, congenital or acquired postural impairment, also untreated injuries of the knee in addition to the natural aging process can contribute to knee joint damage. Smaller injuries in the joint may be severe enough to cause medium to long term joint damage when they are not treated properly or at all.
• In the case of advanced knee joint wear, knee joint arthrosis, the insertion of an implant may be a final step that can be taken by patients as a solution for the permanent relief of his pain to restore joint function and improvement of mobility. To restore the patient to a healthy and active lifestyle, it is necessary by means of endoprosthetic surgery, to use an artificial knee joint prosthesis. Endoprosthesis is a surgical procedure, in which permanent implants remain in the body that completely or partially replace the damaged joint. The procedure is generally considered safe, but only if it is carried out by experienced specialists. The prospect of alleviating pain and more life-joy and quality of life for the patient is therefore very sensitive to the surgeon's experience.
• When asked how the quality of life has changed after surgery, 14% of patients answered with negative or very negative, and only less than 80% are satisfied with the result of the operation or very satisfied. The reason is mainly the lack of standardization and standardization of the fabrication of tendon and tendon tension in the patient. Surgery can cause pain in the patient by incorrectly adjusted soft tensile stresses due to loosely or tightly adjusted tendons, which are equally unpleasant and stressful for the patient. These patients are often mistreated for many years and often a final remedy is another surgery, where the cause of the pain, the wrong compliance of the soft tissue stress is eliminated. Doctors are constantly confronted with such cases in their practices and has therefore dealt extensively with the idea of how the endoprosthetics in the area of the knee can be simplified in that the patient can be replaced in a standardized surgical method where a long process of suffering with a new operation is spared, long convalescence times are avoided and patients briefly after surgery can again live an active and healthy lifestyle with high quality of life and joy of life.
• The knee joint is the largest joint in the human body and connects the thigh bones, knee, and shin bone. As so-called twist and hinge gels, allows diffraction and bending stretching the leg, as well as a slight turning in and out in the flexed state. The knee joint is secured and stabilized by complex system of ligaments, in cooperation with the function of tendons, muscles connective tissue, the articular cartilage and the intervertebral discs, the menisci. The knee must be able to withstand heavy loads during its daily use and also guarantee sufficient mobility. The contact surfaces of the knee joint bones are several millimeters thick, very smooth and elastic cartilage layer. Cartilage cells and matrix tissue function as a shock absorber and allows for a painless and undisturbed mobility of the knee joint. The two menisci, which consist of connective tissue and elastic cartilage and extending between the femur and the rail header, enlarge the joint surface of the knee and thus distributing the pressure or the weight on the joint optimally affects that overall knee. The joint is encapsulated by a capsule, which is used for the nutrition of the articular cartilage.
• Endoprosthetics has made great strides in the past two years, therefore a large number is now available as a replacement for damaged joints. Prosthesis models are made by different manufacturers but are generally comprised of three main components—a femoral part also called a femoral part, a lower leg part of the tibial part, and knee arthroplasty or patellar replacement. The femoral part and the lower part are made of a chromium, cobalt, molybdenum metal alloy or different metal alloys, and the knee portion consists of the plastic polyethylene. The choice of the appropriate type of prosthesis for the patient depends on the quality—the knee-deep bones, the stability of the sidebands, and the axial deformity of the knee joint (X, O-legs).
• There are two types of prosthesis which can be used. A prosthesis for surface replacement, and a second type, a steered axle endoprosthesis. Surface replacement can be used when there is sufficient bone strength and a stable sideband. This type offers the advantage of minimal bone loss. The stability of the artificial joint is determined mainly by the intact and stable sidebands. The upper part of the thigh has the shape of a shell which fits the right fit thigh roller and is placed after it has been form-fitted. The tibial part has the form of a plate, which is connected to a stem. This plate is placed on the previously prepared lower leg plateau. The stem optimizes the connection between the implant and the lower margin mark. On this, an inlay made of an abrasion—resistant plastic is placed, which has an inlay of the artificial thigh replacement corresponding to a concave depression as the actual joint surface. Patellar replacement is performed by replacing the back surface of the knee disc with a plastic disc.
• Axle-guided endoprosthesis may be used for soft bones, loose side bands or shear axis deformities. The axis-guided prosthesis is implanted. In doing so, more bones have to be sacrificed, but the artificial joint offers a very high stability, the reduced function of the loosened sidebands compensated. Again, femur and tibia are appropriately prepared so that the individual prosthesis parts fit into the seat. The anchoring of the prosthesis parts is achieved by means of the long stems, which allow an extremely stable attachment. The stability itself is achieved by a hinge joint present in the prosthesis. For each part of the prosthesis, whether it is a surface replacement or a guided endoprosthesis, they are available in different sizes, all of which are compatible with each other. Due to this modular design of the prostheses, it is possible to intraoperatively compensate for the dimensions of the patient's personal knee joint.
• In order to replace the diseased knee joint with an implant, the surgeon makes a curved skin incision that is approximately 20 cm long at the front of the joint. The joint capsule is then opened. The knee joint is angled about 90° and the anterior cruciate ligament and the remains of internal and external ligaments and external meniscus can be removed. Subsequently, the thigh, then the lower plateau, and finally the knee arthroplasty surface is prepared by exactly predetermined bone sections, such that the prosthesis not only comes to an optimal seat, but also leads to a sufficient degree of movement for the patient. After insertion of the three prosthesis parts, with or without cement, plastic inlays, the joint is implanted and flexibility is tested. During the operation, it is ensured that not only the normal leg axis is restored, but also that the leg is fully stretched and over a right angle. This is necessary especially for everyday movements such as climbing stairs.
• For performing the surgery and placing the implants correctly, different tools and gauges from the individual implant manufacturers are available, which provide a precise resection of the bone and an exact positioning of the implants. However, a measuring instrument or a precision tool for recording the values of the soft tissue tension (the ligament balancing) of the patient before surgery, and for adjusting the soft tissue tension during the operation, in order to verify and document the values after completion of the procedure, does not currently exist. Existing instruments in the area of endoprosthetics of the knee are only on the maintenance of the articular line but not the preservation of the joint line tension in the soft tissues. The soft tissue tension is still adjusted by means of a “simple clamping tool” and is dependent on the experience of the surgeon. Decisions for the maintenance of the correct tension condition after the intervention is at the subjective assessment of the surgeon, which is very sensitive with experience in carrying out such interventions, and is not linked to objective evaluation criteria. If this soft tissue tension is applied by the surgeon on the basis of a false judgment (e.g., is too tight, or too loose), this has a dramatic negative-effect impact on the patient's well-being.
• Before the operation, the patient was greatly restricted in movement due to the severe wear of the cartilage and the missing damping function in the knee. With surgery, pain in the joints may have disappeared, but may now experience new pain in the region of the muscles and the tendon muscles. Inaccurate implantation results in the new pain in the sense of an overloading of the muscles, negatively influencing the success of the operation. As a result, the mobility as well as the quality of life of patients can be severely hampered. The resulting increased need for therapies and drug administration causes considerable additional costs in the health care sector, which are avoidable. The consequences are often lengthy and expensive after treatments of the patient, such as, for example, different movement therapies, pain therapies (as potent as morphine patches) and are all too often long periods of suffering for the patient.
• The remedy is, however, only a new intervention on the already operated knee to correct the previous error. In summary, the patient experiences a long process and painful suffering if the operation is poor. Unsatisfactory operation results also cause the insurer enormous extra costs. Accordingly, there is a need for an objective measuring and control system for the reproduction of the original muscle and tendon tension during the implantation of the knee implant of the patient.
• Stryker Medical is a global group with more than 26,000 employees with its product range is mainly focused on the development and distribution of medical and orthopedic articles in the field of endoprosthetics, the traumatology and endoscopy. Stryker Medical distributes a software product under the name OrthoMap that provides automatic dimensioning and positioning of the implants on the basis of the unique anatomy of the patient. The software solution is primarily aimed at the mechanical axis of the patient.
• Corin Group PLC, headquartered in England, develops and manufactures worldwide, products in the field of endoprosthesis hip, knee, and ankle joints. Corin draws on many years of experience in the field of bone-conservation and gentle implant technology. The Corin implants are characterized by their optimized longevity, significant abrasion reduction and reduction of the contact stress of knee implants compared to “single radius designs” from other manufacturers. The design additionally takes anthropometric female and male features based on global data to ensure optimized performance in implant seating. An instrument offered by Corin in combination with the design of the Implant—Unity™ provides intro-operative flexibility. Stems and augmentations, in the case of primarily complicated interventions is made possible by means of the instrument. Here, as with Stryker, the main focus is on preserving the joint line.
• As is also the case with the two competitors above, Zimmer Biomet has a comprehensive portfolio of innovative knee products and instruments. Their instrument portfolio includes a tool for optimum axial alignment and the alignment of the implants, however a tool for measuring the soft tissue tension of the patient before implant placement and adjustment of the optimal soft tissue tension before fixation of the implant is completely absent.
• A system for measuring and restoring the soft tissue tension in the leg of the patient is neither present nor thought of. Searches for further large implant and instrument manufacturers in the field of endoprosthesis, as well as in the examples given above companies, has provided neither a corresponding tool to the objective measurement of the soft tissue tension, nor the reproduction of this soft tissue tension after the insertion of the implant, has been developed. In addition, manufacturers are striving only to sell their own products, therefore mainly instruments and devices that are only offered in connection with their own implants. These instruments are usually not combined or can be used with products from other companies.
• In summary, therefore, it can be stated that there is a need for a medical tool in the field of endoprosthesis for an objective adjustment of the dynamic soft tissue tension in the leg of patients during the course of the implantation of an artificial knee joint, which is not related to any specific implant—it should be platform independent.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
• The present invention provides a patient-specific arthroplasty system comprising a database comprising preoperative data, ligament balancing tool data, and postoperative data associated with a plurality of patients, a preoperative evaluation module that receives preoperative data for a given patient, an analysis engine that analyzes the database, receives the preoperative data, and generates a surgical recommendation based on the preoperative data of the given patient and the analysis of the database, and a pin positioning block module that receives the surgical recommendation and determines a pin positioning block based on the surgical recommendation.
• The preoperative data may include scans, testing, physiological analysis, and surveys. The preoperative data may also include anatomical situations, kinematic situations, requests, and demands. In one embodiment, the preoperative data includes long leg X-rays of anterior-posterior views, side views, and a patella sunrise view. The preoperative data may also include a computed tomography scan for bony landmarks and three-dimensional impression. The preoperative data may also include magnetic resonance imaging to obtain cartilage thickness and cartilage wear. The preoperative data may also include electromyography testing of muscles. The preoperative data may also include gait analysis.
• In one embodiment, the analysis engine further generates an avatar from the preoperative data, the avatar including a three-dimensional movement of a knee and adjacent joints. The analysis engine may further store the preoperative data to the database. The ligament balancing tool data may include tension data at various knee angles. The analysis engine may further determine success and failure of prior surgical recommendations based on the postoperative data. In another embodiment, the analysis engine further modifies the surgical recommendation based on the analysis of the database. The surgical recommendation may include parameters for the pin positioning block. In yet another embodiment, the analysis engine further determines optimal configurations of an implant for the given patient based on a comparison to the plurality patients according to sex, age, weight, height, and physical factors. The pin positioning block module may also further produce the produce pin positioning block using a three-dimensional printer.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
• The invention is illustrated in the figures of the accompanying drawings which are meant to be exemplary and not limiting, in which like references are intended to refer to like or corresponding parts.
• FIG. 1 illustrates a prospective view of a ligament balancing tool according to an embodiment of the present invention.
• FIG. 2 illustrates a right side view of the ligament balancing tool according to an embodiment of the present invention.
• FIG. 3 illustrates a top view of the ligament balancing tool according to an embodiment of the present invention.
• FIG. 4 illustrates a left perspective cross-sectional view of the ligament balancing tool according to an embodiment of the present invention.
• FIG. 5 illustrates a left cross-sectional view of the ligament balancing tool according to an embodiment of the present invention.
• FIG. 6 andFIG. 7 illustrate schematic top view diagrams of the ligament balancing tool according to an embodiment of the present invention.
• FIGS. 8A and 8B illustrates an exemplary user interface for displaying the initiating of the ligament balancing tool according to an embodiment of the present invention.
• FIGS. 9A, 9B, 10A, and 10B illustrate an exemplary user interface for recording a tension profile according to an embodiment of the present invention.
• FIG. 11 illustrates a prospective view of a ligament balancing tool according to an embodiment of the present invention.
• FIG. 12 illustrates a rear side view of the ligament balancing tool according to an embodiment of the present invention.
• FIG. 13 illustrates a right-side cross-sectional view of the ligament balancing tool according to an embodiment of the present invention.
• FIG. 14 illustrates a bottom view of the ligament balancing tool according to an embodiment of the present invention.
• FIGS. 15A and 15B illustrate a surgical pin positioning block according to an embodiment of the present invention.
• FIGS. 16A and 16B illustrate a surgical pin positioning block according to another embodiment of the present invention.
• FIG. 17 illustrates a data flow diagram of a patient-specific arthroplasty system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
• Subject matter will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof, and which show, by way of illustration, exemplary embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. Subject matter may, however, be embodied in a variety of different forms and, therefore, covered or claimed subject matter is intended to be construed as not being limited to any example embodiments set forth herein; example embodiments are provided merely to be illustrative. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. Likewise, a reasonably broad scope for claimed or covered subject matter is intended. Among other things, for example, subject matter may be embodied as methods, devices, components, or systems. Accordingly, embodiments may, for example, take the form of hardware, software, firmware or any combination thereof (other than software per se). The following detailed description is, therefore, not intended to be taken in a limiting sense.
• Throughout the specification and claims, terms may have nuanced meanings suggested or implied in context beyond an explicitly stated meaning. Likewise, the phrase “in one embodiment” as used herein does not necessarily refer to the same embodiment and the phrase “in another embodiment” as used herein does not necessarily refer to a different embodiment. It is intended, for example, that claimed subject matter include combinations of exemplary embodiments in whole or in part.
• The disclosed systems and methods provide for a platform to help surgeons reproduce the natural kinematics of the patient in endoprosthetic surgery. Accordingly, objectives associated with one or more of the embodiments described in the present disclosure may include:
• • Measurement of the soft tissue or tendon tension of the patient before installation of the implant,
  • Measurement of the joint and rotational angle in connection with the pressure load on the device,
  • Objectification and standardization of the operating method in the field of fabrication of the band and soft tissue tension of the patient during the endoprosthetic surgery,
  • Preparation of the muscle condition of the patient—the original condition before the surgical procedure,
  • Manufacturer-independent measuring instrument, suitable for all knee prostheses from different manufacturers,
  • Automatic logging of the measured values, the tension state and before and after implantation/surgery,
  • Patient-related unalterable protocol to traceability and legal certainty for critical surgical results for the doctor as well as the patient, and
  • Easy-to-use measuring instrument.
• Through the development of a measuring instrument(s) disclosed herein, for recording the soft tissue tension of the patient in the region of the knee before the implantation of the prosthesis and use of this measuring instrument for the reproduction of the natural kinematics of the patient during and/or after insertion of the implant, a revolutionary step is provided towards an objectification and standardization of a surgical method during endoprosthetic procedures with the aid of the measuring instrument. Exact measurements of the tension profile of the soft parts and ligaments of the affected person for the purposes of comparison during the operation, as well as for the subsequent complete documentation of the operation results are made possible with the measuring instrument(s) disclosed herein.
• The measurement of the tendon tension itself can take place in contrast to only when preparation of the tibia was previously available. In doing so, the medial and lateral forces during the rolling of the knee (0° to 90°) can be captured exactly by the sensors of the disclosed measuring instrument to record a reference profile produced by tension signals from the measuring instrument. Through the dynamic measurement over the entire movement space, the existing kinematics are measured, the correct incision planes are obtained for the femur in flexion and stretching. This is an approximation, or ideal achievement of the original state after the operation ensured.
• After successful slices on the femur, measurement of the tendon tension is repeated with a femur trial and compared with previous measurements. After insertion of the knee implants, before the fixation, present practice in the case of the stretching and bending of the joint is manually and optically checked by the surgeon to determine appropriate function, the result for the patient therefore is based on a subjective impression. However, according to embodiments of the present invention, previously recorded values by the measuring instrument can be dynamically compared over the entire radius of movement of the knee. Data from the measuring instrument may be shown on a monitor to show a doctor how far the profile of the tension progress after the final placement of the prosthesis in the knee deviates from the previous recorded reference profile, during the unrolling of the stretched into the angled state and back again.
• In doing so, a user interface may be displayed on the monitor including a color bar display indicating “in range” and “out of range” values. The color provides a visual depiction of how far the profile deviates from the previously recorded reference profile to adjust the implant accordingly, that the tension profile measured from the device are within defined boundaries, and ideally, to show a uniform matching to the previously recorded reference profile after the setting of the implant. The comparison of the tension profile may be provided by an application that provides a traffic light comparison of the band tension by a color. For example, green can mean correct band tension, yellow that the tension measured by the device is within a certain tolerance range and red that the deviation is too strong, i.e., the tension has been set too tightly or too loosely. The user interface may be displayed on a display device such as a computer, laptop, tablet, or mobile device for the medical field.
• For the patient, the disclosed procedure can be used to ensure that the ligament balancing in the patient's leg after surgery closely matches that of the previously recorded reference values. An improvement in rehabilitation of the patient from the operation may result by the use of the measuring instrument to produce the natural kinematics of the patient, in the ideal case the same muscle tension state of the patient prior to the surgical procedure is restored.
• Automatic Logging
• A further feature of the disclosed measuring instrument lies in the automatic recording of the recorded reference values of the patient before the start of the operation, as well as the measured values after successful application of the implant in the patient's joint. Measurement data can be recorded into a program from the measuring device and unambiguously assigned to a corresponding patient where the recorded patient-specific measurement and reference values may be stored in an immutable file. The tremendous advantage of this is that in case of post-surgery issues, a more accurate diagnosis can be made using the patient-specific data to determine a source of complications. In the long term, due to the evaluation of this data by the orthopedic surgeon can result in improved reliability of operations and increase patient satisfaction. In addition to these advantages, the recording of the data may also provide legal certainty after operations, both for the surgeon, as well as for the patient, due to accurate logging and unchangeable documentation of the values and their traceability through the operation.
• Manufacturer-Independent Measuring Instrument
• On the market, there are among some big players like the aforementioned companies Stryker, Corin, Mathis, and Zimmer Biomet that are in the field of the manufacture of endoprosthesis. The presently disclosed measuring instrument is distinguished by the fact that it is developed in such a way that it may be used independently of the endoprosthetic product used. A limitation of the applicability and thus the dependency of one or a few manufacturers of implants for the replacement of knee joints are thus eliminated and the market for the application is broadly diversified.
• The platform independence of the disclosed device may be achieved via an incision adapter for the femur to the respective prosthesis.
• Advantages of one or more of embodiments of the disclosed system and method include:
• • Objectification and standardization of an operating method,
  • Manufacturer independence,
  • Measurement of the soft tissue tension and the tension profile of the medial and lateral acting forces over the entire range of motion of the joint,
  • Easy operation and visually clear display to show deviations from an ideal state,
  • Production of the patient's natural kinematics,
  • Reduction of the proportion of dissatisfied patients with problems after the surgery,
  • Faster rehabilitation,
  • Reduced follow-up,
  • Significantly reduced follow-up costs,
  • Recording and logging of the measurement results documentation,
  • Storage in unchangeable file format—traceability for patients and doctors, and
  • Connection to common hospital software interfaces.
Technical Aspects
• Ligament Balancing
• An emphasis for the disclosed system and method is to ensure the correct measurement of the original tension of the tendons and weighing, as well as the corresponding transmission of these measured values in the connection with an artificial knee joint in the patient's leg. An existing problem is that measurements for preparing tendon tension on the opened knee of the patient should not be taken on the “intact” knee since values obtained with an intact knee are not transferable. The corresponding solution disclosed herein includes recording the original tension condition of the soft parts and tendons in the open state of the knee and transferring the original condition accordingly.
• Validation
• Closely linked to the previously identified problem of correct measurement, is the topic of the validation of the tension history recordings of the measurement of the soft tissue tension. Given the novelty of the disclosed method of operation and production of the correct tendon tension using a completely new approach, neither reference values, nor preliminary studies dealing with of the problem exist. Therefore, performance of detailed examinations and measurements are disclosed herein.
• Material Selection and Sensor Technology
• In the area of the right material selection for the manufacture of the disclosed measurement instrument of tendon tension at the opened knee, the following factors are considered, where according to one embodiment, the measurement instrument (hereinafter referred to as a “ligament balancing tool”) may be a “medical disposable product.” A sterile packaged ligament balancing tool suitable for use in the open knees may be produced from cost-effective materials. Alternatively, it is possible for the tool to be made from completely inert and biologically “safe” materials such as titanium, or gold, for disposable use, albeit cost-intensive. Therefore, in the selection process, a corresponding use is a decisive factor in determining suitable materials for the ligament balancing tool. The following points for material selection are from a cost-effective point of view.
• Biocompatibility of the Material
• In terms of biocompatibility, it is important that materials or assemblies used for the ligament balancing tool do not have any negatives effect on the patient. In particular, for sensors that are embedded within the ligament balancing tool, there are two aspects that are disclosed in detail herein—the equipment of the sensors in the ligament balancing tool, e.g., methods and materials for embedding the sensors to the ligament balancing tool, and the sensors themselves. Capable sensors that are biocompatible and certified for the presently disclosed usages are described herewith along with sensor development.
• Resistance of the Material—Biological Corrosion
• In addition to being safe for the patient when using the material, resistance of the material itself by means of the body or body tissue fluids is of crucial importance. These thematic issues arise especially with regard to the consideration of using sensors in the opened knee, as well as the data transmission required by the sensors to a recording device. The highly corrosive effect of tissue fluids on the formation of biotically formed acids or salts, can have a negative effect on the connections and contacts of sensors. Due to the aggressiveness of these fluids, rapid progression of corrosion in the sensors and materials used in the ligament balancing tool is to be expected.
• Sensor Technology—Ensuring Measurement Cycles
• In addition to the previously mentioned biocompatibility and the stability of the materials against the aggressive environment in the area of the open knee, that is, the medical fitness of the materials used, the sensitivity, signal recording, signal interpretation, and sensor position(s) in the ligament balancing tool is of crucial importance. It is important that the necessary measuring cycles for the recording as well as the setting of the soft tissue tension can be processed without appreciable changes in the characteristics of the recording and transmission of the data.
• Sterilization
• The field of sterilization of tools, are described herein. The preferred way of sterilization of disposable medical devices in industrial sterilization is carried out with ionizing radiation. X-ray radiation, gamma radiation or electron bombardment are predominantly used. Typical radiation doses that are to be used are in the range of 25 kGy, mostly from gamma radiation from cobalt-60 sources.
• Usability for all Standard Implants
• A feature of the disclosed ligament balancing tool includes a broadest possible applicability for nearly all common implants from different manufacturers. The success of the disclosed system is ensured by applicability to at least the implants produced by the largest manufacturers on the market.
• Data Recording, Data Storage
• Issues addressed in this section are related to ensuring personal data, the immutability of recorded data, as well as the reading of the data via the interface.
• Interface Issues
• The data recorded by the ligament balancing tool can be archived accordingly via an interface from the tool to a data acquisition system connected to a hospital. In the field of medicine, there are internationally standardized interfaces for data transfers, but not all hospitals support these interface. Additionally, it is to be considered whether there are country-specific or regional regulations are to be followed.
• Personal Data Recording
• The disclosed system records sensitive personal data—that is, health-related information, it is ensured that such information is not viewed by unauthorized persons, and a misuse of the personal information is prevented.
• Immutability of Data
• Another feature is the immutability of the data recorded by the disclosed system. Data recorded during the operation, neither during data recording, nor transmission of the data to a system of a hospital, in the course of archiving the data in the system, can it be changed. In this manner can a complete documentation ensure, in case of a complaint from the patient is received, an objective source of information for both the patient and the surgeon.
Technical Solutions
• Ligament Balancing and Validation
• A measurement of soft tissue tensions in an open knee, as close as possible to the original conditions, is described herewith. To get validated measurement results, it is important that the tibia is prepared accordingly. A ligament balancing tool may be fitted to the tibial plateau at an angle of 90° to the axis of the tibia. After mounting and fixing the tool on the tibial plateau, the soft tissue tension in the leg of the patient stretched from 0° to 90° can be measured. The measured values characterized the normal state of the knee and the values themselves can be validated. If needed, the measurement range can be extended to a full range of motion.
• The ligament balancing tool may comprise a knee endo-prosthetic inlay that is integrated with sensors to record forces and/or tensions. The inlay may be produced according to varying sizes of the human knee. The inlay may be equipped with two or more pressure sensors to record a tension profile of both medially and laterally acting forces during unrolling of the knee in the bended 90° angled position. A reference tension profile can be recorded (measurements may be repeated to eliminate errors) and used for comparison to a final arrangement of the prosthesis in the knee. In this case, the doctor is informed of the range of motion of the leg of the patient, by recording a second tension profile after successful implantation of the artificial joint to determine deviations from the reference profile. A visual display may be presented via a color bar display where a quick overview (e.g., in range, out of range) can be represented by a color coding.
• According to one embodiment, the inlay may include two or more platforms where each platform is supported by a scissor arm structure and an underlying coil spring overlying a sliding surface. One leg of the scissor arm structure may be in a fixed position while a second leg of the scissor arm structure is capable of moving along the sliding surface upon downward pressure or tension on the platform. Force exerted on the platform may be transferred to the underlying coil spring where a pressure sensor may be positioned below the coil spring to measure a degree of the tension. In a default or initial position, the platforms may be supported in an up-right position by the springs. After inserting the inlay in the opened knee, the sliding surfaces are able to be depressed a given displacement through a 90° range of motion of the leg, which may record the tension produced on the inlay at certain angles throughout the range of motion. Measurement may be activated by pressing a start button beginning at the 0° start position of the knee and pressing an end button to confirm reaching an end position (90°) of the knee. Data or signals from the sensors in the inlay may be transmitted by either a wired or wireless communication channel (e.g., Bluetooth) to a computing device over a network.
• By evaluating the results in relation to a previously recorded reference tension profile, complex calibration steps in the approval (e.g., for tension forces) of setting soft tissue tension and implant can be avoided. A relatively linear tension profile for the knee in the range of 0° to 90° may be expected and any extreme variation may be noted. In one embodiment, the ligament balancing tool may include sensors for measuring the joint cavity as well as an inertial measurement unit to measure the tilt of the tibia in space.
• In another embodiment, a femoral sensor may be used in conjunction with the ligament balancing tool to calculate flexion or extension of the knee. The femoral sensor may include electronics, batteries, a housing and a fixation device such as a strap. The femoral sensor may be worn and positioned on the thigh or blood arrest of a same leg with the ligament balancing tool. The femoral sensor may further include an inertial measuring unit that measures the tilt of the device that corresponds to the tilt of the femur in space. The measured tilt angle of the femoral sensor may be compared in relation to the ligament balancing tool and used to calculate flexion of the leg. The femoral sensor may be connected with a tablet or computing device via wired or wireless communication protocols. The tablet/computing device may connect wirelessly with both the ligament balancing tool and the femoral sensor. According to one embodiment, a measurement program may be programmed to automatically trigger measurements with the ligament balancing tool at certain flexion angles (e.g., between the range of 0° to 90°) measured by an inertial measurement unit or the femoral sensor.
• The disclosed ligament balancing tool and femoral sensor may also be applied in other joint applications such as, elbows, hips, and shoulders.
• Material and Sensor Selection
• A special purpose plastic may be envisioned for producing the inlay (including the platforms, scissor arm structure, and sliding surface) as a packaged sterile single-use part. For example, PMFP (polymer medical flexible plastic), similar to polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), has a smooth surface such that foreign substances (e.g., wound secretions) do not adhere to it, and may be used for the inlay. PMFP has high elasticity and temperature resistance and is a biocompatible material. Alternatively, one or more components of the inlay may be high quality surgical steel (316L stainless steel), in addition to the coil springs. The sensors may be comprised of biocompatible materials that is capable of temporarily remaining in the body for a short duration of time e.g., less than 60 minutes. According to one embodiment, the sensors may be encapsulated within the inlays such that the sensors would not be in direct contact with patient tissue.
• Sterilization is of the utmost importance to comply with the safety of the patient. Sterilization of the instrument may be ensured by selecting appropriate materials for the manufacture of the ligament balancing tool. A preferred method of gamma radiation sterilization, the doses of radiation in the impact areas are tolerable for most materials, however, having a higher radiation resistance on the outer sides of the product as compared to the product core is advantageous because the doses are significantly higher. Especially with plastics, damage can be difficult to avoid because the polymer structure is changed by irradiation. The consequences can reduce tensile, breakage, or impact strength of the components. The sterilization process may be taken into account in the consideration of the design and selection of material for the inlays comprised in the ligament balancing tool.
• Platform independence plays a significant role in the design process of the ligament balancing tool. To achieve platform independence, product-specific adapters may be provided to operate the ligament balancing tool with products from various global manufacturers of knee implants.
• Data Recording and Storage
• Data may be recorded to a computer program that generates a tension profile according to a start and end point. Such data may be processed in a program that supports international data interfaces in the medical or hospital sector. Additionally, paper prints of the data collected by the computer program are possible. The data may be tamper-proof and unchangeable according to international standards, thus providing clear traceability. The computer program may be further coupled to an access system to provide secure access to users by entering a user name and password
• FIG. 1 presents a ligament balancing tool according to an embodiment of the present invention. Theligament balancing tool100 may comprise aninlay102 including integrated sensors below each ofleft platform104 andright platform106 to measure medial and lateral forces of the knee when placed between the tibia and femur bone, and apin positioning block130. Inlay102 may be produced in different sizes in accordance to variation in sizes of the human knee. Thepin positioning block130 may be a detachable component capable of providing a guide for pin positioning/drilling to assist a surgeon to perform steps required to prepare the femur and tibia for receiving the implant. According to one embodiment, theligament balancing tool100 may be produced as a sterile packaged single-use part and combined into a product set (e.g., including a vernier caliper). Additionally, theligament balancing tool100 may be either platform-dependent (e.g., designed for specific products from different manufacturers) or platform independent (universally compatible, e.g., via an adapter).
• In one embodiment, the medial and lateral forces may be captured from the sensors to create a representative tension profile of the knee during 0° to 90° flexion of the knee. The sensors may create voltage or signals representative of the amount of force or tension produced on theleft platform104 andright platform106, individually. Voltage or signals from the sensors may be coupled to connectingcable120 for transmission of the voltage or signals to a computing device via an interface. The computing device may include software for signal acquisition and processing of the voltage or signals from the sensors to provide a visualization of the measured data, which is described in further detail with respect to the description ofFIGS. 9A, 9B, 10A, and 10B. The computing device may comprise computing devices (e.g., desktop computers, terminals, laptops, personal digital assistants (PDA), cell phones, smartphones, tablet computers, or any computing device having a central processing unit and memory unit capable of connecting to a network). The computing device may also comprise a graphical user interface (GUI) or a browser application provided on a display (e.g., monitor screen, LCD or LED display, projector, etc.).
• Each ofleft platform104 andright platform106 may be supported by ascissor arm structure112 and108, respectively, and an underlying coil spring overlying (and attached to inlay102 at) respective recessed slidingsurfaces116 and118. A given platform may be supported in an up-right position by an elastic material such as coil spring. For example,FIG. 2 presents a right side view of the ligament balancing tool according to an embodiment of the present invention.Right platform106 may be fixed abovescissor arm structure108 andcoil spring110. Pressure may be individually applied to each platform causing the platforms to move from an extended (or fully upright) position to a depressed position.
• FIG. 3 presents a top view of the ligament balancing tool according to an embodiment of the present invention. Theligament balancing tool100 may be placed between the femur and the tibia such that the left andright platforms104 and106 are beneath the femur (or femoral component) andinlay102 is above the tibia (or tibial baseplate).Left platform104 andright platform106 further includesindentation130 andindentation132, respectively.Indentation130 and132 may be provided to accommodate the femur bone. The indentations are generally mirror images of each other, as shown. Accordingly, the femur bone is able to fit inindentation130 and132 without slippage when pressed against left andright platforms104 and106.
• Referring back toFIG. 1, each scissor arm structure may include a fixed leg (122 and126) that is configured in a fixed position and a sliding leg (124 and128) that is capable of moving vertically along the recessed slidingsurfaces116 and118 upon downward pressure or tension placed on the left and right platforms (104 and106).FIG. 4 presents an exposed view of thecoil spring114 and recessed slidingsurface116 includingfixed leg122 and slidingleg124. Pressure applied onleft platform104 andright platform106 may be transferred to pressure sensors beneathcoil springs110 and114. An additional exposed view and exemplary dimensions ofinlay102 are presented inFIG. 5.
• FIG. 6 andFIG. 7 present schematic top view diagrams of the ligament balancing tool. Pressure sensors may be positioned below each coil spring to measure a degree of tension.Sensor202 may be beneathcoil spring114 andsensor204 may be beneathcoil spring110. In alternative embodiments, the sensors may be embedded within the coil springs, scissor arm structures, and/or the platforms. Exemplary width of device fromsensor202 tosensor204 as illustrated is 46.37 mm.Sensors202 and204 may have of a height of approximately one mm and a diameter of about eight mm.
• Thesensors202 and204 may be comprised of pressure or force measurement devices such as piezo or force-sensitive resistor (FSR) sensors that are commercially available. However, capacitive sensors and other strain gauges may also be used accordingly to their durability and reliability. Thesensors202 and204 may be connected to an electrical or signal bus comprised in connectingcable120. Connectingcable120 may be adapted frominlay102 to a connector (e.g., via a wired connection) for communication with external electronics that are able to receive and convert the voltages or signals fromsensors202 and204 into data for display and recording.
• FIG. 8A presents an exemplary user interface for displaying data from the ligament balancing tool according to an embodiment of the present invention. The illustrated screen includespatient data320,implant type322, left/right selector324, andjoint angulation326.Patient data320 may include the patient's first name, last name, date of birth, patient ID, admission number, and insurance number. Various modes of operation may be selected by togglingimplant type322. For example,implant type322 may select between knee, hip, or shoulder. A left/right selector324 may be selected to indicate whether a current measurement is of a patient's anatomical left or right body part (e.g., left knee or right knee).Joint angulation326 may be used to specify a patient's joint angulation such as,varus, neutral, or valgus.
• FIG. 8B presents an exemplary user interface for displaying data from the ligament balancing tool according to another embodiment of the present invention. An initiation screen may include fields forpatient name302,patient ID304, patient number306 (e.g., an independent patient number that can be provided to individual identification systems),knee identifier308, anddoctor identifier310. A size of an inlay may also be selected using theinlay identifier312. Upon population and verification of the data, a user may proceed to measurements by selecting the acceptdata button314.
• FIG. 9A presents an exemplary user interface for recording reference data for distance and pressure according to an embodiment of the present invention. The illustrated user interface includes a chart of reference data for distance and pressure comprising columns formedial data420,angle422, andlateral data424.Medial data420 andlateral data424 includes distance (measured in millimeters (mm)) and pressure (measured in Newtons (N)) sub-columns. Themedial data420,angle422, andlateral data424 may correspond to distance and pressure measurements detected by a ligament balancing tool as depicted by the ligament balancing tool diagram434.
• Joint diagram426 displays a representative diagram of a measured joint.Current flexion indicator428 may represent a detected flexion position of the joint corresponding to current flexion angle232 which displays the detected flexion angle of the joint.Target flexion indicator430 may represent an indicated position to move the joint for a next measurement, e.g., 30°.Trigger toggle436 may allow the operator to select between automatic or manual measurement triggers. According to one embodiment, an automatic measurement trigger may automatically record measurements at certain flexion angles when moving the joint through the flexion angle. By contrast, a manual measurement trigger may allow an operator to manually record measurements.
• FIG. 9B presents an exemplary user interface for recording a reference tension profile according to an embodiment of the present invention. The disclosed ligament balancing tool may transmit measurement signals to software for calculating pressure, angles and distances. A reference tension profile of a “pre-prosthetic” knee may be created and recorded from the signals for comparison to a second tension profile, with the final assembly of a prosthesis in the knee. The software may be activated via a start button to start capturing tension data from a reference point when the knee is at a 0° position. When the knee has reached a 90° position, the measuring process may be terminated via an end button.
• Signals from the ligament balancing tool may be populated to “pre”medial height402 and “pre”lateral height404 measurements on the left region of the user interface. The heights may correspond to measured displacements of the left and right platforms (e.g., medial and lateral on the left knee) when placed between the femur and tibia during flexion of the knee at reference angles410. The heights may provide information about necessary thickness of bone cuts parallel to the tibial baseplate and in flexion about rotation. Reference angles410 include angles of 0°, 30°, and 60° that may be influenced by distal femoral cuts, and 90° influenced by dorsal cuts (condyles rotation).
• Measurements may be repeated on a “post-prosthetic” knee to create the second tension profile for comparison with the reference tension profile. As illustrated inFIG. 10A, measurement signals from the ligament balancing tool may be populated to “post”medial height406 and “post”lateral height408 forreference angles410 on the right region of the user interface. The “pre” and “post” measurements at thereference angles410 may be compared to determine a degree of difference between the tension profiles. By comparing the “pre” and “post” measurements, a surgeon may be able to determine or adjust medial and lateral heights for the knee to achieve appropriate stability and tension state. According to the illustrated example, each box inreference angles410 may be shaded in a color that corresponds to an indication of “in-range” and “out-of-range” knee angles after “post” or operation incisions.” A knee is preferably operated such that the length between the medial and lateral distance is within a certain range to avoid instability and pain. For example, green may be shown to indicate that there is not more than a three-millimeter difference between the medial and lateral heights. Yellow may indicate that there is more than a three-millimeter difference between the medial and lateral heights which may be borderline acceptable depending on general condition and anatomical condition, and recuts may be necessary according to the measured results. Red may indicate that there is more than five mm difference between the medial and lateral heights which may be out of a required range, and recuts are necessary. Accordingly,reference angles410 may indicate certain knee angles that require recuts and an amount to recut based on the color indications.
• FIG. 10B presents an exemplary interface for comparing reference data to post-surgery data according to an embodiment of the present invention. The measured reference data may be compared with post-prosthetic measurements from the ligament balancing tool. In the illustrated embodiment, the distance and pressure measurements along the various flexion angles are verified to be identical in both pre- and post-surgery.
• FIG. 11-14 present views of a ligament balancing tool according to an alternative embodiment of the present invention.FIG. 11 shows aligament balancing tool1100 comprising aninlay1102 that includes aleft platform1104 and aright platform1106. Referring toFIG. 12, leftplatform1104 is attached toscissor arm structure1108 which is comprised of afixed leg1122 and a slidingleg1124.Right platform1106 is attached toscissor arm structure1112 which is comprised of afixed leg1126 and a slidingleg1128. Referring back toFIG. 11, fixedleg1122 and slidingleg1124 are attached to inlay1102 at recessed slidingsurface1116, and similarly, fixedleg1126 and slidingleg1128 are attached to inlay1102 at recessed slidingsurface1118. The sliding legs (1124 and1128) are capable of moving vertically along the recessed slidingsurfaces1116 and1118 upon downward pressure or tension placed on theleft platform1104 andright platform1106.
• FIG. 12 further illustrates leftplatform1104 andright platform1106 positioned abovecoil spring device1110 andcoil spring device1114. Force sensing sensors may be placed underneathcoil spring device1110 andcoil spring device1114. For example,FIG. 13 presents a right-side cross-sectional view ofligament balancing tool1100 wherecoil spring device1110 is positioned abovesensor1130 such thatcoil spring device1110 makes contact (direct or indirect) withsensor1130 whenright platform1106 is depressed.Inlay1102 further includes acable1120 that is electronically connected to the sensors beneathcoil spring device1110 andcoil spring device1114 for transmission of signals or data from the sensors (associated with a tension, pressure, or displacement applied toleft platform1104 and right platform1106) to a computing device.FIG. 14 presents a bottom view of the ligament balancing tool whereinlay102 further includes asensor cover1132.Sensor cover1132 may be placed over circuitry associated the sensors andcable1120.
• FIG. 15A presents a front view a pin positioning block according to an embodiment of the present invention. The illustratedpin positioning block1500 comprises atop portion1520 that includespin position dial1502, dialposition notches1504A and1504B, pinposition dial indicator1506, stabilizingbolt1508, slidingmember1516 and slidingmember1518. Pinposition dial1502 includes pin hole guides1524 and1526 on opposite distal ends ofpin position dial1502. Each of pin hole guides1524 and1526 may include an orifice for drilling of pin holes. Thepin positioning block1500 may be used to drill pin holes into the femur bone through pin hole guides1524 and1526. The pin hole guides1524 and1526 may be and ‘X’ distance from each other, depending on the size of the femur and/or tibia bones.Pin positioning block1500 further comprises abottom portion1522 that includes a ligamentbalancing tool adapter1514, as illustrated inFIG. 15B. Ligamentbalancing tool adapter1514 is configurable for mating with a ligament balancing tool or prosthetic inlay device to stabilize and positionpin positioning block1500 with a femur. The ligamentbalancing tool adapter1514 may comprise one or more prongs or inserts that may be inserted, attached or coupled to the ligament balancing tool or prosthetic inlay device. The distance between the center ofpin position dial1502 and ligamentbalancing tool adapter1514 may be a distance ‘A’.Bottom portion1522 may have a thickness of ‘B’.
• Pinposition dial1502 may be turned either clockwise or counter-clockwise to select an angular position for both pin hole guides1524 and1526. The angular positions of pin hole guides1524 and1526 may be inversely related to each other. For example, pin hole guides1524 and1526 remains 180° from each other such that an increase in an angular position of one pin hole guide results in a corresponding decrease in an angular position of the second pin hole guide. Dialposition notches1504A and1504B may secure thepin position dial1502 in a given position. Pinposition dial indicator1506 may indicate an angular position of thepin position dial1502. The distance between the middle of stabilizingbolt1508 and the bottom ofbottom portion1522 may be varied by a distance ‘Y’.Top portion1520 may be removably coupled tobottom portion1522 by slidingmember1516 and slidingmember1518. Slidingmembers1516 and1518 can be inserted into their respective receptacles inbottom portion1522. Thetop portion1520 may be extended frombottom portion1522 via slidingmember1516 and slidingmember1518 to adjust the horizontal position or height of pin hole guides1524 and1526. The horizontal position or height may be secured by lockingmechanism1512. Stabilizingbolt1508 may be secured to the femur or a femoral component to provide additional stability at thetop portion1520.Bottom portion1522 further includescaliper1510 that slides along a scale and may be configured as a tibial plate sizer.
• 16A presents a front view a pin positioning block according to an embodiment of the present invention.Pin positioning block1600 comprises atop portion1614 that includespin position dial1602, dialposition notch1604, stabilizingbolt1622, slidingmember1610 and slidingmember1612. Pinposition dial1602 includes pin hole guides1618 and1620. Each of pin hole guides1618 and1620 may include an orifice for drilling of pin holes. Thepin positioning block1600 may be used to drill pin holes into the femur bone through pin hole guides1618 and1620. The pin hole guides1618 and1620 may be and ‘X’ distance from each other, depending on the size of the femur and/or tibia bones.Pin positioning block1600 further comprises abottom portion1616 that includes a ligamentbalancing tool adapter1624, as illustrated inFIG. 16B. Ligamentbalancing tool adapter1624 is configurable for mating with a ligament balancing tool or a prosthetic inlay device to stabilize and positionpin positioning block1600 with a femur. The ligamentbalancing tool adapter1624 may comprise one or more prongs or inserts that may be inserted, attached or coupled to the ligament balancing tool or prosthetic inlay device. The distance between the center ofpin position dial1602 and ligamentbalancing tool adapter1624 may be a distance ‘A’.Bottom portion1616 may have a thickness of ‘B’. The distance between the top oftop portion1614 andbottom portion1616 may be a distance ‘C’.
• Pinposition dial1602 may be raised or lowered to adjust the angular position ofpin hole guide1618. In the present embodiment,pin hole guide1620 may comprise a pivot point ofpin position dial1602 and remains in a constant angular position. Dialposition notch1604 may secure thepin position dial1602 in a given position. The distance between the middle of stabilizingbolt1622 and the bottom ofbottom portion1616 may be varied by a distance ‘Y’.Top portion1614 may be removably coupled tobottom portion1616 by slidingmember1610 and slidingmember1612. Slidingmembers1610 and1612 can be inserted into their respective receptacles inbottom portion1616. Thetop portion1614 may be extended frombottom portion1616 via slidingmember1610 and slidingmember1612 to adjust the horizontal position or height of pin hole guides1618 and1620. The horizontal position or height may be secured by lockingmechanism1606. Stabilizingbolt1622 may be secured to the femur or a femoral component to provide additional stability at thetop portion1614.Bottom portion1616 further includescaliper1608 that slides along a scale and may be configured as a tibial plate sizer.
• According to one embodiment of the present invention, a patient-specific arthroplasty (PSA) system for individualized knee implant configurations may be used in conjunction with the disclosed ligament balancing tool and pin positioning block. In particular, knee implants may be adjusted according to specific and individual anatomical situations (e.g., alignment, planned implant and procedure), individual kinematic situations (e.g., demands and physiological condition), and individual requests and demands (e.g., to perform certain physical activities, such as rock climbing, running, biking, etc.). The PSA system may collect preoperative measurements and dynamic evaluation of the kinematics of the knee to evaluate correct cuts, and produce or configure the disclosed pin positioning blocks. The PSA system used in conjunction with the ligament balancing tool may facilitate optimal fitting of the implant with an adequate soft tissue balancing.
• A set of preoperative evaluations may be performed to determine appropriate configuration of pin positioning blocks. The evaluation may include obtaining information from long leg X-rays anterior-posterior (longitudinal alignment frontal plane), from the side (longitudinal alignment sagittal plane), and patella sunrise view (alignment of the patellofemoral joint); computed tomography (CT) scan (for bony landmarks and three-dimensional impression) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (to obtain cartilage thickness and cartilage wear); electromyography (EMG) testing (preoperative status of the following muscles: musculus quadriceps femoris (musculus rectus femoris, musculus vastus medialis), musculus semitendinosus, and musculus biceps femoris, compared to a healthy side and/or control cohort of healthy people), gait analysis (e.g., shows the walking procedure and pressure and load distribution on the healthy and affected side), and clinical examination and scoring. An evaluation may further include a survey for preferences and lifestyles (e.g., current activities and capabilities) and demands (e.g., desired kinds of activities and capabilities). A CT or MRI scan may be performed to obtain the proper shape of the femoral and tibial surface. An EMG testing may also be performed to evaluate the muscular strength for kinematic evaluation. Long leg x-rays can be performed to achieve an imagination of the individual kinematics. An avatar may be generated from the testing and scans to show three-dimensional movement of the knee and the adjacent joints. Additionally, when combined with gait analysis, a complete set of data may be used to model an individual movement.
• Data from the preoperative measurements can provide a surgical recommendation to a surgeon according to the general physical condition of the knee and identify the soft tissue situation to achieve an optimally balanced knee. The preoperative measurements and evaluation data may be stored in a database and compared with data from other patients to improve the recommendation. The recommendation may be determined using an algorithm to determine optimal configurations of an implant for a particular patient according to their preoperative measurements and evaluations in addition to their sex, age, weight, height, and other physical factors to be compared with other patients. The recommendation may be used to produce pin positioning blocks, for example, printed by a three-dimensional or 3-D printer on site according to a suitable implant determined from the preoperative measurements and survey. During the surgical procedure, the ligament balancing tool may be used to additionally improve the balance situation of the soft tissue. The results of the ligament balancing tool can give an imagination to change the soft tissues situation intraoperatively by re-cutting or releasing. Progress of the treatment can be surveilled by regular postoperative checkups by re-performing one or more of the preoperative evaluations. Such postoperative data may be used to further improve the recommendations for other patients
• FIG. 17 illustrates a data flow diagram of a patient-specific arthroplasty system according to an embodiment of the present invention.Analysis engine1702 is operable to generate surgical (e.g., implant type, pin positioning block, and/or cutting) recommendations based on data frompreoperative evaluation module1704 anddatabase1706.Database1706 may comprise a storage device containing data from a plurality of patients. Thedatabase1706 includespreoperative data1712, ligament balancing tool data1714, andpostoperative data1716.
• Preoperative evaluation module1704 may gather preoperative measurements and evaluations data of a given patient. The preoperative measurements and evaluations data may include scans, testing, physiological analysis, and surveys to provide anatomical situations, kinematic situations, requests, and demands. Theanalysis engine1702 may generate an avatar from the preoperative measurements and evaluations data to show three-dimensional movement of the knee and the adjacent joints. Data gathered bypreoperative evaluation module1704 may be stored todatabase1706 inpreoperative data1712.Ligament balancing tool1708 may record and transmit tension data at various knee angles (as disclosed above) and use the tension data during surgical intervention to aid in adjusting the implant. The tension data may be collected by theanalysis engine1702 and transmitted todatabase1706 for storage in ligament balancing tool data1714.
• Postoperative data1716 may include postoperative measurements and evaluations data of a given patient after surgical implant. The postoperative measurements and evaluations data may be similar in type to the preoperative measurements and evaluations data but is instead recorded after certain periods following surgery. The data indatabase1706 may be analyzed to determine trends and patterns in comparison with certain surgical recommendations. For example,analysis engine1702 may analyze thepostoperative data1716 to determine the success and/or failure of certain recommendations. According to one embodiment,analysis engine1702 may generate a surgical recommendation by using data frompreoperative evaluation module1704.Analysis engine1702 may further modify or improve the surgical recommendation using the analysis of data of other patients fromdatabase1706. For example, theanalysis engine1702 may determine optimal configurations of an implant for a particular patient according to their preoperative measurements and evaluations in addition to their sex, age, weight, height, and other physical factors to be compared with other patients.
• The recommendations may include parameters or configuration for a type of implant and a pin positioning block.Analysis engine1702 may receive an acceptance of a recommendation to produce or configure the pin positioning block. Theanalysis engine1702 may transmit data associated with the recommendation to pinpositioning block module1710. The pinpositioning block module1710 may use the data to produce or determine a pin positioning block according to parameters or configurations specified in the recommendation.
• FIGS. 1 through 17 are conceptual illustrations allowing for an explanation of the present invention. Notably, the figures and examples above are not meant to limit the scope of the present invention to a single embodiment, as other embodiments are possible by way of interchange of some or all of the described or illustrated elements. Moreover, where certain elements of the present invention can be partially or fully implemented using known components, only those portions of such known components that are necessary for an understanding of the present invention are described, and detailed descriptions of other portions of such known components are omitted so as not to obscure the invention. In the present specification, an embodiment showing a singular component should not necessarily be limited to other embodiments including a plurality of the same component, and vice-versa, unless explicitly stated otherwise herein. Moreover, applicants do not intend for any term in the specification or claims to be ascribed an uncommon or special meaning unless explicitly set forth as such. Further, the present invention encompasses present and future known equivalents to the known components referred to herein by way of illustration.
• It should be understood that various aspects of the embodiments of the present invention could be implemented in hardware, firmware, software, or combinations thereof. In such embodiments, the various components and/or steps would be implemented in hardware, firmware, and/or software to perform the functions of the present invention. That is, the same piece of hardware, firmware, or module of software could perform one or more of the illustrated blocks (e.g., components or steps). In software implementations, computer software (e.g., programs or other instructions) and/or data is stored on a machine-readable medium as part of a computer program product, and is loaded into a computer system or other device or machine via a removable storage drive, hard drive, or communications interface. Computer programs (also called computer control logic or computer readable program code) are stored in a main and/or secondary memory, and executed by one or more processors (controllers, or the like) to cause the one or more processors to perform the functions of the invention as described herein. In this document, the terms “machine readable medium,” “computer readable medium,” “computer program medium,” and “computer usable medium” are used to generally refer to media such as a random access memory (RAM); a read only memory (ROM); a removable storage unit (e.g., a magnetic or optical disc, flash memory device, or the like); a hard disk; or the like.
• The foregoing description of the specific embodiments will so fully reveal the general nature of the invention that others can, by applying knowledge within the skill of the relevant art(s) (including the contents of the documents cited and incorporated by reference herein), readily modify and/or adapt for various applications such specific embodiments, without undue experimentation, without departing from the general concept of the present invention. Such adaptations and modifications are therefore intended to be within the meaning and range of equivalents of the disclosed embodiments, based on the teaching and guidance presented herein. It is to be understood that the phraseology or terminology herein is for the purpose of description and not of limitation, such that the terminology or phraseology of the present specification is to be interpreted by the skilled artisan in light of the teachings and guidance presented herein, in combination with the knowledge of one skilled in the relevant art(s).

Claims (16)

What is claimed is:

1. A patient-specific arthroplasty system comprising:

a database comprising preoperative data, ligament balancing tool data, and postoperative data associated with a plurality of patients;

a preoperative evaluation module that receives preoperative data for a given patient;

an analysis engine that analyzes the database, receives the preoperative data, and generates a surgical recommendation based on the preoperative data of the given patient and the analysis of the database; and

a pin positioning block module that receives the surgical recommendation and determines a pin positioning block based on the surgical recommendation.

2. The system ofclaim 1 wherein the preoperative data includes scans, testing, physiological analysis, and surveys.

3. The system ofclaim 1 wherein the preoperative data includes anatomical situations, kinematic situations, requests, and demands.

4. The system ofclaim 1 wherein the preoperative data includes long leg X-rays of anterior-posterior views, side views, and a patella sunrise view.

5. The system ofclaim 1 wherein the preoperative data includes a computed tomography scan for bony landmarks and three-dimensional impression.

6. The system ofclaim 1 wherein the preoperative data includes magnetic resonance imaging to obtain cartilage thickness and cartilage wear.

7. The system ofclaim 1 wherein the preoperative data includes electromyography testing of muscles.

8. The system ofclaim 1 wherein the preoperative data includes gait analysis.

9. The system ofclaim 1 wherein the analysis engine further generates an avatar from the preoperative data, the avatar including three-dimensional movement of a knee and adjacent joints.

10. The system ofclaim 1 wherein the analysis engine further stores the preoperative data to the database.

11. The system ofclaim 1 wherein the ligament balancing tool data includes tension data at various knee angles.

12. The system ofclaim 1 wherein the analysis engine further determines success and failure of prior surgical recommendations based on the postoperative data.

13. The system ofclaim 1 wherein the analysis engine further modifies the surgical recommendation based on the analysis of the database.

14. The system ofclaim 1 wherein the surgical recommendation includes parameters for the pin positioning block.

15. The system ofclaim 1 wherein the analysis engine further determines optimal configurations of an implant for the given patient based on a comparison to the plurality patients according to sex, age, weight, height, and physical factors.

16. The system ofclaim 1 wherein the pin positioning block module further produces the produce pin positioning block using a three-dimensional printer.

Images