PRIOR APPLICATIONThis application claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/977,710, filed Oct. 5, 2007, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
BRIEF DESCRIPTIONTechnical FieldThe present invention is related to electronic trading and, more particularly, to electronic trading of equity derivatives.
BackgroundAn equity derivative is a class of financial instruments whose value is derived in part from one or more underlying equity securities. Options are a common type of equity derivatives. An option purchaser obtains the right, but not the obligation, to engage in a future transaction on some underlying security. The option seller collects a premium and is obligated to perform if the holder exercises his right under the option contract.
Generally, there are two types of options: call options and put options. A call option provides the option holder the right to buy an agreed quantity of a particular security from a seller at a certain time for a set price. In contrast, a put option provides the holder with the right to sell an agreed quantity of a particular security to the seller at a certain time for a set price. The seller has the obligation to purchase the underlying security at that price, if the holder exercises the option.
When securities are traded, a trader will generally receive a request or “order” to buy or sell a number of shares of the security, and the trader will then execute the trade in the appropriate market or markets. Orders that occur between institutional parties are called “block” trades. A block equity trade is for 250,000 shares or more and a block equity option trade is for at least 500 contracts. However, the average execution size in the markets for these securities is substantially smaller than “block” size. The average equity execution is between 300 and 200 shares and the average equity option execution is between 20 and 10 contracts. In some cases, orders often cannot be executed in a single transaction between one buyer or seller and must be executed as multiple transactions and at multiple prices often spread out over a period of time.
Many equity traders use a Volume Weighted Average Price (VWAP) benchmark to evaluate how well a trade is executed. VWAP is the average of the price of every trade, weighted by the size of the trade over a period of time. In layman's terms, VWAP defines a fair price—what the market, as a whole, paid, as an average. In recent years, the use of VWAP in the equities markets has developed further, and traders can achieve a VWAP price through a variety of mechanisms: many broker-dealers offer guaranteed VWAP pricing to their clients; there are systems, algorithms and firms available that target VWAP on an agency basis; and there are products, such as Instinet's VWAP cross, that are designed for bringing together block trades at a fair price. These trades are forward-priced, meaning that when the trade is agreed to, the price is unknown—it must be determined later. At the end of the VWAP interval, when the price can be calculated, the trade is reported through any number of regulated channels. This type of order is generally known as a “benchmark order.”
Because of the way VWAP trades are priced, the execution price of a VWAP trade is likely to be different from the price that is available in the market at the time the trade is reported. Because of this discrepancy between the VWAP price and the current price and because of the accepted fairness of the forward-pricing mechanism, the rules and regulations governing the trading of equity securities trading clearly allow for these sorts of execution mechanisms.
Though VWAP is common in the equities market, it is not used in the equity derivatives market. The many reasons for this include: 1) the fact that derivatives often do not trade consistently throughout the day. They are “chunkier” and more random in occurrence, therefore there are fewer relevant price points to use in determining a VWAP price; 2) much of the derivatives volume is done in multi-leg trades—spreads and other complex orders—where one derivative's contingent trading price is based on the price of another asset with simultaneous contingent execution. These trades must be priced to fit inside the current available and displayed prices (at or between the National Best Bid and Offer or NBBO), but do not necessarily reflect the accurate price of each individual option series; and 3) most importantly, there exists no mechanism today to report, to or through the derivatives exchanges, a VWAP (or any other forward-priced) trade. Today all listed equity option trades must take place on an exchange and must be at or between the best available prices on all exchanges (NBBO), therefore an average priced trade may not take place.
Accordingly, there is a need for improved systems and methods for exchange-traded equity derivatives.
BRIEF SUMMARYConsistent with the present invention, there is provided a computer-readable storage medium having instructions which, when executed on a processor, perform a method for generating a benchmark price for an exchange-traded equity derivatives order, the method comprising: receiving a first delta value, a gamma value, a value-weighted average price value of an underlying stock, a reference price value of the underlying stock, and an original order premium value; where the first delta value is a measure of the rate of change in a theoretical value of an option for a one-unit change in the price of the underlying stock; the gamma value is a measure of the rate of change in a delta of an option for a one-unit change in the price of the underlying stock; and the original order premium value is an agreed value; calculating a master rate of change value based on the value-weighted average price and reference price values; calculating an adjusted delta value based on the first delta value, the master rate of change value, and the gamma value; calculating a gamma-weighted average price value based on the original order premium value, the master rate of change value, and the adjusted delta value; and outputting the gamma-weighted average price value as a benchmark price for the order.
Consistent with the present invention, there is provided an apparatus for generating a benchmark trading price for an exchange-traded equity derivatives order, comprising: an input module for receiving input values, the input values comprising a first delta value, a gamma value, a value-weighted average price value of an underlying stock, a reference price value of the underlying stock, and an original order premium value; where: the first delta value is a measure of the rate of change in an option's theoretical value for a one-unit change in the price of the underlying stock; the gamma value is a measure of the rate of change in an option's delta for a one-unit change in the price of the underlying stock; and the original order premium value is a value set for the order with corresponding values based on the first delta value, gamma value, and reference price value; a processor for performing calculations, including: calculating a master rate of change value based on the value-weighted average price and the reference price values; calculating an adjusted delta value based on the first delta value, the master rate of change value, and the gamma value; and calculating a gamma-weighted average price value based on the original order premium value, the master rate of change value, and the adjusted delta value; and an output module for outputting the gamma-weighted average price value as a benchmark trading price for the order.
Consistent with the present invention, there is provided a computer-readable storage medium having instructions which, when executed by a processor, perform a method for matching pre-open orders using a gamma-weighted average price, the method comprising: receiving pre-open orders from a trader during a first time period, the pre-open orders including a seller amount and price or a buyer amount and price; storing the pre-open orders in an order module; matching the pre-open orders during a second time period that begins after the first time period ends, the orders being matched when the seller amount and price of a pre-open order matches the buyer amount and price of a pre-open order; receiving market data during a third time period that begins after the second time period ends; calculating a gamma-weighted average price value based on the received market data, the gamma-weighted average price being based on an original order premium value, a master rate of change value, and an adjusted delta value; and outputting the gamma-weighted average price value as an estimate of a trading price for the order.
Consistent with the present invention, there is provided an apparatus for conducting forward-price trades in the equity derivatives market, the apparatus comprising: a communications module for receiving pre-open orders from a trader during a first time period, the pre-open orders including a seller amount and price or a buyer amount and price; an order module for storing the pre-open orders; a matching module for matching the pre-open orders during a second time period that begins after the first time period ends, the pre-open orders being matched when the seller amount and price of a pre-open order matches the buyer amount and price of a pre-open order; an input module for receiving market data during a third time period that begins after the second time period ends; a calculation module for calculating a gamma-weighted average price based on the received market data, the gamma-weighted average price being based on an original order premium value, a master rate of change value, and an adjusted delta value; and a display module for outputting the gamma-weighted average price a benchmark price for the order.
Consistent with the present invention, there is provided a computer-readable storage medium having instructions which, when executed on a processor, perform a method for calculating the level of trading interest of derivative instruments at a gamma-weighted average price and incremental prices around the gamma-weighted average price, the method comprising: receiving pre-open orders from a trader during a first time period, each pre-open order including (1) a seller amount value at a gamma-weighted average price value or a second price value, or (2) a buyer amount value at the gamma-weighted average price value or the second price value; calculating the level of buyer trading interest at the gamma-weighted average price value by adding the buyer amount value in each pre-open order at the gamma-weighted average price value; calculating the level of buyer trading interest at the second price value by adding the buyer amount value in each pre-open order at the second price value; calculating the level of seller trading interest at the gamma-weighted average price value by adding the buyer amount value in each pre-open order at the gamma-weighted average price value; calculating the level of seller trading interest at the second price value by adding the buyer amount value in each pre-open order at the second price value; and outputting values representing the level of buyer trading interest at the gamma-weighted average price value, the level of buyer trading interest at the second price value, the level of seller trading interest at the gamma-weighted average price value, and the level of buyer trading interest at the second price value.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the invention, as claimed.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments consistent with the invention and together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGSFIG. 1 is a data flow diagram consistent with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is flow diagram showing an exemplary operation of an imbalance module;
FIG. 3 is a graphical depiction of an example illustrative of calculations of the imbalance module depicted inFIG. 2;
FIG. 4 is a flow diagram showing an exemplary operation of a calculation module; and
FIG. 5 is a diagram of an exemplary embodiment of a computer system that may implement the embodiments of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTIONReference will now be made in detail to the exemplary embodiments consistent with the present invention, an example of which is illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts. It is apparent, however, that the embodiments shown in the accompanying drawings are not limiting, and that modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Embodiments of the present invention may include a Gamma-weighted Options Pricing (GWAP) methodology that brings to the exchange traded equity derivatives market a benchmark that can be used the way VWAP is used in the equities market. Using a Convexity Measurement (Gamma) in an equation where the VWAP of the underlying security (stock, index, or the like) can be calculated, the GWAP factor may accurately and equitably estimate the change in value of the options premium that would have resulted if the options traded in a direct linear volume relationship with its underlying security.
FIG. 1 is a data flow diagram of an exemplary embodiment consistent with the invention. As shown inFIG. 1, aGWAP system200 may include adisplay module210, aninput module220, anorder module230, amatching module240, acalculation module250, acommunication module260, animbalance module270, amemory280, and aprocessor290.
Traders100 can submit pre-open orders to the GWAPsystem200 during an order entry period viacommunication module260. Thecommunication module260 may communicate using the Financial Information eXchange (FIX) protocol or any other acceptable electronic communications protocol for the exchange of information. The pre-open orders can include one or more pieces of information such as, for example, a trader's interest in executing a trade at the GWAP price and/or incremental prices around the GWAP price. These pre-open orders are received by the GWAPsystem200 and are maintained inorder module230 until the order entry period expires and orders are matched by matchingmodule240 during a matching period. In addition, theimbalance module270 of the GWAPsystem200 may use the pre-open orders to calculate the level of trading interest of derivative instruments at the GWAP price and incremental prices around the GWAP price, and report that interest through thecommunication module260 to, for example, thetraders100, in the event that thetraders100 want to modify their pre-open orders. However, during the matching period no new orders are accepted and no order modification may take place.
During the matching period, thematching module240 calculates the maximum match quantity and pairs off, or matches, pre-open orders to achieve the maximum match quantity. For example, buyers who want to buy x number of contracts of a security at GWAP are matched with sellers who want to sell x number of contracts of a security at GWAP. In addition, the matchingmodule240 may also use a priority system to match pre-open orders if there are multiple pre-open orders that could be filled to achieve an optimum match quantity. For example, pre-open orders in the same series may be ranked using size priority, and pre-open orders in the same series that are the same size may be ranked using time priority.
After the pre-open orders have been matched and the matching period has expired, thetraders100 who submitted orders may receive match confirmations that their order has been filled. Unmatched orders or any unmatched portion of an order will be cancelled, and cancel notifications may be transmitted to thetrader100 whose order was not filled. Thecommunications module260 is responsible for distributing order confirmation and/or cancelation notifications. Generally, both the order entry period and the matching period begin and conclude before the market opens for trading. Thus, following the matching period, the market opens and executes trades which determine the data used to calculate the GWAP execution price.
After the conclusion of trading, theinput module220 may receive input values from, for example, anexchange300. These input values can include, but are not limited to, public market data obtained during the trading day (as discussed above) including a delta value, a gamma value, a value-weighted average price of an underlying stock, a reference price of the underlying stock, and an order original premium value. Theinput module220 may transmit the input values to thecalculation module250, which in turn uses the input values to calculate the GWAP execution price as discussed in more detail below.
Subsequently, acommunication module260 of theGWAP system200 may report the GWAP trades to an exchange orSRO300, such as the Chicago Board of Options Exchange (CBOE), and through the exchange or SRO to the public and other required industry dissemination services such as, for example, the Options Price Reporting Authority (OPRA)401 and the Options Clearing Corporation (OCC)402. The exchange orSRO300 may also send an acknowledgement of receipt of the report of the GWAP trades. In addition, thecommunication module260 may transmit the GWAP execution price to a number of individuals or entities, including thetraders100 who submitted orders, and preferably only to thetraders100 who submitted orders that were filled or partially filled. Furthermore, theGWAP system200 may include adisplay module210 that can display the GWAP execution price and/or well as the trades that occurred at the GWAP price and incremental prices around the GWAP price.
FIG. 2 is flow-chart demonstrating an exemplary method used by theimbalance module270 to calculate the level of trading interest of derivative instruments at the GWAP price and incremental prices around the GWAP price. After receiving the pre-open orders S271 for price points, theimbalance module270 may calculate the total interest of the buyers S272 and/or the sellers S273. In addition, the imbalance module may calculate the buy clearing price and/or the buy clearing size S274, the sell clearing price and/or the sell clearing price S275, and/or the indicative crossing price, indicative crossing size, and/or indicative price imbalance S276. After one or more of the above calculations are complete, theimbalance module270 may transmit one or more of the results of these calculations S277 through thecommunications module260 of theGWAP system200.
FIG. 3 is a graphical depiction of an example illustrative of calculations of theimbalance module270 as depicted inFIG. 2. As shown inFIG. 3, Buyer A is willing to buy 30,000 contracts at GWAP or 15,000 contracts at GWAP+0.50 VEGA1while Buyer B is only willing to buy 25,000 contracts at GWAP. Conversely, Seller A is willing to sell 30,000 contracts at GWAP+1.00, 20,000 contracts at GWAP+0.75 VEGA, 10,000 contracts at GWAP+0.50 VEGA, 7,500 contracts at GWAP+0.25 VEGA, or 5,000 contracts at GWAP. In addition, Seller B is willing to sell 15,000 contracts at GWAP+1.00 VEGA or 10,000 contracts at GWAP+0.50 VEGA. There are no buyers or sellers at GWAP −0.25 VEGA or GWAP+1.25 VEGA. Vega is a derivative of the option value with respect to the volatility of the underlying option.
Theimbalance module270 calculates the interests of the buyers and sellers at the GWAP price and the incremental prices around the GWAP price, the results of which are shown in Table 1 below.
| TABLE 1 |
| |
| | Total Contracts | Total Contracts |
| Price Point | (Sellers) | (Buyers) |
| |
|
| GWAP − 0.25 VEGA | 0 | 0 |
| GWAP | 5,000 | 55,000 |
| GWAP + 0.25 VEGA | 7,500 | 0 |
| GWAP + 0.50 VEGA | 20,000 | 15,000 |
| GWAP + 0.75 VEGA | 20,000 | 0 |
| GWAP + 1.0 VEGA | 45,000 | 0 |
| |
In this case, the interest of the buyers at the GWAP price is 55,000 contracts (Buyer A's interest of 30,000 contracts at GWAP+Buyer B's interest in 25,000 contracts at GWAP) and the interest of the sellers at the GWAP price is 5,000 contracts (Seller A's interest of 5,000 contracts at GWAP+Seller B's interest of 0 contracts at GWAP). Additionally, the interest of the buyers at the GWAP+0.25 VEGA is 0 contracts (Buyer A's interest of 0 contracts at GWAP+0.25 VEGA+Buyer B's interest of 0 contracts at GWAP+0.25 VEGA) while the interest of the sellers at GWAP+0.25 VEGA is 5,000 contracts (Sellers A's interest of 5,000 contracts at GWAP+0.25 VEGA+Seller B's interest of 0 contracts at GWAP+0.25 VEGA).
In addition to calculating the interest of the buyers and the sellers, theimbalance module270 may calculate the clearing prices and sizes (i.e. the maximum number of buys or sells at GWAP or at each incremental price around GWAP if each order was filled). In this example, the maximum number of buys occurs at GWAP because if each order was filled there would be 55,000 contracts as opposed to only 15,000 contracts at GWAP+0.50. Thus, the buy clearing price is GWAP and the buy clearing size is 55,000. Conversely, the maximum number of sells occurs at GWAP+1.00 because if each order was filled there would be 45,000 contracts.
Theimbalance module270 may also calculate the indicative crossing price and size, as well as the indicative price imbalance. Here, there are no sellers or buyers at GWAP−0.25 VEGA, and there are no buyers at GWAP+0.25 VEGA or GWAP+0.75 VEGA. Thus, in this example, if the buyers and sellers were matched, the maximum number of orders would be filled at GWAP+0.50 VEGA and the number of orders filled would be 15,000, leaving sellers with an additional 5,000 contracts that they were willing, but were unable to sell. Thus, the indicative crossing price in this example is GWAP+0.50 VEGA, the indicative crossing size is 15,000 and the indicative price imbalance is 5,000 to sell.
While the pricing increments described herein and shown inFIG. 3 are relative increments, such as ±0.5 VEGA, the pricing increments may be absolute increments such as ±0.5 and may be any number or fraction thereof.
FIG. 4 is a flow diagram showing an exemplary operation of thecalculation module250. Thecalculation module250 receives the input values S251 and may calculate the Rate of Change S252 by subtracting the Stock Reference from the VWAP of the underlying stock, as represented by equation (1)
Rate of Change=VWAP of the Underlying Stock−Stock Reference (1)
As shown inFIG. 4, thecalculation module250 may also calculate the Adjusted Delta S253 by adding or subtracting (for calls and puts, respectively) the Rate of Change multiplied by the Gamma of the options contract to/from the Delta of the option contract, as represented by equations (2) and (3):
Adjusted Delta=Delta+(Rate of Change×Gamma) for call options (2)
Adjusted Delta=Delta−(Rate of Change×Gamma) for put options (3)
Thecalculation module250 may also calculate the GWAP S254 by adding (for call options) or subtracting (for put options) the Rate of Change of the underlying stock multiplied by an Adjusted Delta to/from the Original Order Premium, as represented by equations (4) and (5):
GWAP=Original Order Premium+(Rate of Change×Adjusted Delta) for call options (4)
GWAP=Original Order Premium−(Rate of Change×Adjusted Delta) for put options (5)
The Original Order Premium may be an input value set by the pre-sale order with corresponding values based on the First Delta, Gamma, and the Stock Reference, where First Delta is a measure of the rate of change in an option's theoretical value for a one-unit change in the price of the underlying stock, Gamma is a measure of the rate of change in an option's First Delta for a one-unit change in the price of the underlying stock, and the Stock Reference is the actual last trade of the underlying stock and/or the price of the stock at the time of order arrival.
After calculating the GWAP, the calculation module may transmit the results of the GWAP calculation to thecommunication module260. The GWAP above is calculated using a straight delta-adjusted formula. However, variations of the GWAP formula and trading process can be used such as a second-order Taylor expansion version, or any similar n-order variation that smooths an option price over a period of time based on the delta, gamma, and VWAP of the underlying security. For example, assuming that the First Delta of call options is positive and the First Delta of put options is negative, the GWAP may be calculated using equation 6.
GWAP=Original Order Premium+(First Delta×Rate of Change)+0.5×(Gamma×(Rate of Change)2) (6)
The following example is illustrative of a calculation using an exemplary formula of an embodiment of present invention:
EXAMPLE 2A customer sells 10,000 contracts of XYZ at the GWAP, a price to be determined later. The following criteria are used to compute the GWAP.
When
- First Delta=30%
- Gamma=6%
- Original Order Premium=2.00
- Stock Reference=$130.50
- VWAP=131.26
The calculations are as follows:
GWAP=Original Order Premium+(First Delta×Rate of Change)+0.5×(Gamma×(Rate of Change)2)
VWAP−Stock Reference=Rate of Change
131.26−130.5=0.76
GWAP=2.00+(0.30×0.76)+0.5×(0.06×(0.76)2)
GWAP=2.00+0.228+0.017
GWAP=2.245
The calculations completed by theimbalance module270 and thecalculation module240 are only exemplary, and theimbalance module270 need not complete each and every one of those calculations in order to calculate the level of trading interest of derivative instruments and thecalculation module240 need not complete each and every one of the calculations to calculate the GWAP price. Indeed, thecalculation module240 and theimbalance module270 may complete more or less calculations than those described above. Furthermore, the order of the calculations discussed above are not limited to the exemplary orders shown inFIGS. 2 and 4.
Referring now toFIG. 5, exemplary embodiments consistent with the invention may be implemented on acomputer system500.Computer system500 may comprise acomputer510, amemory520, agraphics processing unit530, an input/output unit540, and amass memory unit550, such as a hard disk, interconnected by abus560.Computer system500 may further includecommunications unit565 for connection to anetwork568 such as a LAN or the Internet; adisplay unit570, such as a liquid crystal display (LCD); and one or more input devices, such as akeyboard580 and CD-ROM drive590 for reading a computer-readable medium which is encoded with instructions. The instructions may then be read intomemory280, thereby formingmodules210,220,230,240,250,260, and270. When the instructions are executed byprocessor510, thecomputer system500 may perform the methods described above.
Other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope and spirit of the invention being indicated by the following claims. For example, while in this exemplary embodiment, theGWAP system200 includes a single memory and processor, multiple processors and memories could be used. As another example, each module can communicate with thetraders100, theexchange300, and the like themselves without requiring a transmission to thecommunication module260.