Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


US20190012376A1 - Preference visualization system and censorship system - Google Patents

Preference visualization system and censorship system
Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20190012376A1
US20190012376A1US16/028,478US201816028478AUS2019012376A1US 20190012376 A1US20190012376 A1US 20190012376A1US 201816028478 AUS201816028478 AUS 201816028478AUS 2019012376 A1US2019012376 A1US 2019012376A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
individual person
text data
censorship
information
preference
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US16/028,478
Inventor
Jun Fujimoto
Nobuyuki Nonaka
Hiroshi Katsukura
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Universal Entertainment Corp
Original Assignee
Universal Entertainment Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Universal Entertainment CorpfiledCriticalUniversal Entertainment Corp
Priority to US16/028,478priorityCriticalpatent/US20190012376A1/en
Publication of US20190012376A1publicationCriticalpatent/US20190012376A1/en
Abandonedlegal-statusCriticalCurrent

Links

Images

Classifications

Definitions

Landscapes

Abstract

A censorship system and method that receives monitored user-generated data, decomposes the monitored data into related terminology, extracts, from the related terminology, a characteristic of the received monitored data, determines a preference of the individual person to be monitored for a specific object based on the extracted characteristic, determines, based on the determined preference for the specific object, whether (i) blocking or terminating of information provision, or (ii) execution of new information provision appropriate to the determined preference, would be an appropriate censorship control command for the individual person to be monitored for the specific object, and outputs an appropriate censorship control command for the individual person for the specific object.

Description

Claims (6)

1. A censorship system, comprising:
one or more processors programmed to:
receive monitored data that is generated by an individual person to be monitored who is a censor object;
decompose the monitored data into related terminology, which is a plurality of units capable of identifying a meaning;
extract, from the related terminology, a characteristic of the received monitored data based on the plurality of units capable of identifying the meaning;
determine a preference of the individual person for a specific object based on the extracted characteristic;
determine, based on the determined preference, whether (i) blocking or terminating of information provision, or (ii) execution of new information provision appropriate to the determined preference, would be an appropriate censorship control command for the individual person for the specific object; and
output a censorship control command for the individual person for the specific object that is a censorship control command of a type that is the same as the type of the determined appropriate censorship control command for the individual person for the specific object.
2. A censorship system, comprising:
one or more processors programmed to:
receive monitored text data that is composed of a plurality of character strings generated by an individual person to be monitored who is a censor object;
abstract any personal information by which an individual person can be directly identified from the received monitored text data;
decompose the remaining monitored text data after abstraction into related terminology, which is a plurality of units that are capable of identifying a meaning and that includes at least one of the following types of categories: a genre, a preference, a dialect and a feeling;
extract, from the related terminology, a characteristic of the received monitored data based on the plurality of units capable of identifying the meaning;
determine a preference of the individual person for a specific object based on the extracted characteristic;
determine, based on the determined preference, whether (i) blocking or terminating of information provision or (ii) execution of new information provision service appropriate to the determined preference, would be an appropriate censorship control command for the individual person for the specific object; and
output a censorship control command for the individual person for the specific object that is a censorship control command of a type that is the same as the type of the determined appropriate censorship control command for the individual person for the specific object, wherein
the outputted censorship control command is a specific executable command for the individual person based on the determined preference, and
the outputted censorship control command causes blocking of information containing a particular expression.
3. A method comprising:
receiving, by one or more processors, monitored text data composed of a plurality of character strings that are generated by an individual person to be monitored who is a censor object;
abstracting, by the one or more processors, any personal information by which an individual person can be directly identified from the received monitored text data;
decomposing, by the one or more processors, the remaining text data after abstraction into related terminology, which is a plurality of units capable of identifying a meaning;
extracting, by the one or more processors, from the related terminology, a characteristic of the received monitored text data based on the plurality of units capable of identifying the meaning;
determining, by the one or more processors, a preference of the individual person for a specific object based on the extracted characteristic;
determining, by the one or more processors, based on the determined preference, whether (i) blocking or terminating of information provision or (ii) execution of new information provision appropriate to the determined preference, would be an appropriate censorship control command for the individual person for the specific object; and
outputting, by the one or more processors, a censorship control command for the individual person for the specific object that is a censorship control command of a type that is the same as the type of the determined appropriate censorship control command for the individual person for the specific object.
4. A method comprising:
receiving, by one or more processors, text data composed of a plurality of character strings generated by an individual person to be monitored who is a censor object;
decomposing, by the one or more processors, the received text data into related terminology, which is a plurality of units capable of identifying the meaning;
extracting, by the one or more processors, from the related terminology, related text data from the decomposed text data that both satisfies: (i) a predetermined relation condition regarding a specific object indicated by the decomposed text data, and (ii) a predetermined characteristic condition based on an attribute that corresponds to a preference of the individual person;
determining, by the one or more processors, based on the related text data satisfying the predetermined conditions, whether (i) blocking or terminating of information provision or (ii) execution of new information provision appropriate to the preference of the individual person, would be an appropriate censorship control command for the individual person for the specific object; and
outputting, by the one or more processors, a censorship control command for the individual person for the specific object that is a censorship control command of a type that is the same as the type of the determined appropriate censorship control command for the individual person for the specific object, wherein the predetermined relation condition includes one or more accompanying terms associated with the object.
5. A method comprising:
receiving, by one or more processors, text data composed of a plurality of character strings that are generated by an individual person to be monitored who is a censor object;
decomposing, by the one or more processors, the individual person generated text data into related terminology, which is a plurality of units capable of identifying the meaning;
extracting, by the one or more processors, from the related terminology, a characteristic of the received text data based on the plurality of units capable of identifying the meaning;
determining, by the one or more processors, a preference of the individual person for a specific object based on the extracted characteristic;
determining, by the one or more processors, based on the determined preference, whether (i) blocking or terminating of information provision or (ii) execution of new information provision appropriate to the determined preference, would be an appropriate censorship control command for the individual person for the specific object; and
outputting, by the one or more processors, a censorship control command for the individual person for the specific object that is a censorship control command of a type that is the same as the type of the determined appropriate censorship control command for the individual person for the specific object.
6. A method comprising:
receiving, by one or more processors, text data composed of a plurality of character strings that are generated by an individual person to be monitored who is a censor object;
decomposing, by the one or more processors, the individual person generated text data into related terminology, which is decomposed text data capable of identifying the meaning;
extracting, by the one or more processors, from the related terminology, a characteristic of the received text data;
determining, by the one or more processors, a preference of the individual person for a specific object based on the extracted characteristic;
determining, by the one or more processors, based on the determined preference, whether (i) blocking or terminating of information provision or (ii) execution of new information provision appropriate to the determined preference, would be an appropriate censorship control command for the individual person for the specific object; and
outputting, by the one or more processors, a censorship control command for the individual person for the specific object that is a censorship control command of a type that is the same as the type of the determined appropriate censorship control command for the individual person for the specific object, wherein the censorship control command causes the execution of new information provision appropriate to the determined preference.
US16/028,4782011-04-082018-07-06Preference visualization system and censorship systemAbandonedUS20190012376A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application NumberPriority DateFiling DateTitle
US16/028,478US20190012376A1 (en)2011-04-082018-07-06Preference visualization system and censorship system

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application NumberPriority DateFiling DateTitle
JP2011-0864072011-04-08
JP2011086407AJP5872183B2 (en)2011-04-082011-04-08 Information processing system, preference visualization system, censorship system, and preference visualization method
PCT/JP2012/059093WO2012137782A1 (en)2011-04-082012-04-03Preference visualization system and censorship system
US201314006217A2013-09-192013-09-19
US16/028,478US20190012376A1 (en)2011-04-082018-07-06Preference visualization system and censorship system

Related Parent Applications (2)

Application NumberTitlePriority DateFiling Date
PCT/JP2012/059093ContinuationWO2012137782A1 (en)2011-04-082012-04-03Preference visualization system and censorship system
US14/006,217ContinuationUS10055487B2 (en)2011-04-082012-04-03Preference visualization system and censorship system

Publications (1)

Publication NumberPublication Date
US20190012376A1true US20190012376A1 (en)2019-01-10

Family

ID=46969178

Family Applications (2)

Application NumberTitlePriority DateFiling Date
US14/006,217Active2032-12-07US10055487B2 (en)2011-04-082012-04-03Preference visualization system and censorship system
US16/028,478AbandonedUS20190012376A1 (en)2011-04-082018-07-06Preference visualization system and censorship system

Family Applications Before (1)

Application NumberTitlePriority DateFiling Date
US14/006,217Active2032-12-07US10055487B2 (en)2011-04-082012-04-03Preference visualization system and censorship system

Country Status (4)

CountryLink
US (2)US10055487B2 (en)
JP (1)JP5872183B2 (en)
CN (1)CN103635898B (en)
WO (1)WO2012137782A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
CN113033577A (en)*2021-03-262021-06-25山东科技大学Marine target feature extraction method based on variance correction model

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
CN103577510A (en)*2012-07-232014-02-12阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司Search result data display method, search server and mobile terminal
JP5958237B2 (en)*2012-09-252016-07-27富士通株式会社 Thermal fluid simulation method and thermal fluid simulation apparatus
US8909656B2 (en)*2013-03-152014-12-09Palantir Technologies Inc.Filter chains with associated multipath views for exploring large data sets
CN104809229B (en)*2015-05-072018-12-04北京京东尚科信息技术有限公司A kind of text feature word extracting method and system
US11799813B2 (en)*2019-03-292023-10-24Aill Inc.Communication support server, communication support system, communication support method, and communication support program

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
US20060123338A1 (en)*2004-11-182006-06-08Mccaffrey William JMethod and system for filtering website content
US20080133488A1 (en)*2006-11-222008-06-05Nagaraju BandaruMethod and system for analyzing user-generated content
US20100095353A1 (en)*2008-10-092010-04-15Yahoo! Inc.System and method for content access control
US20100169313A1 (en)*2008-12-302010-07-01Expanse Networks, Inc.Pangenetic Web Item Feedback System

Family Cites Families (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
US9183306B2 (en)*1998-12-182015-11-10Microsoft Technology Licensing, LlcAutomated selection of appropriate information based on a computer user's context
JP2001028006A (en)1999-07-152001-01-30Kdd Corp Automatic information filtering method and apparatus
US6976070B1 (en)*1999-02-162005-12-13Kdd CorporationMethod and apparatus for automatic information filtering using URL hierarchical structure and automatic word weight learning
JP4423004B2 (en)*2003-10-032010-03-03三菱電機株式会社 Text mining device, text mining method, and text mining program
JP4479366B2 (en)*2004-06-142010-06-09ソニー株式会社 Program information processing system, program information management server, program information utilization terminal, and computer program.
JP4148522B2 (en)*2004-11-192008-09-10インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーション Expression detection system, expression detection method, and program
JP2006236379A (en)*2006-04-262006-09-07Nec CorpInformation classifying device
US7783622B1 (en)*2006-07-212010-08-24Aol Inc.Identification of electronic content significant to a user
US8024280B2 (en)*2006-12-212011-09-20Yahoo! Inc.Academic filter
JP5243783B2 (en)2007-12-272013-07-24インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーション Community system, community system activity recording method, and community system activity recording program
US20110119130A1 (en)*2009-07-102011-05-19Agan Thomas EMethods, systems, and apparatus to manage meal planning and coupon dispensing
KR102068790B1 (en)*2009-07-162020-01-21블루핀 랩스, 인코포레이티드Estimating and displaying social interest in time-based media
US20110087737A1 (en)*2009-10-142011-04-14Cbs Interactive, Inc.Systems and methods for living user reviews
CN101751458A (en)2009-12-312010-06-23暨南大学Network public sentiment monitoring system and method
US8688691B2 (en)*2011-01-132014-04-01International Business Machines CorporationRelevancy ranking of search results in a network based upon a user's computer-related activities

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
US20060123338A1 (en)*2004-11-182006-06-08Mccaffrey William JMethod and system for filtering website content
US20080133488A1 (en)*2006-11-222008-06-05Nagaraju BandaruMethod and system for analyzing user-generated content
US20100095353A1 (en)*2008-10-092010-04-15Yahoo! Inc.System and method for content access control
US20100169313A1 (en)*2008-12-302010-07-01Expanse Networks, Inc.Pangenetic Web Item Feedback System

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
CN113033577A (en)*2021-03-262021-06-25山东科技大学Marine target feature extraction method based on variance correction model

Also Published As

Publication numberPublication date
US20140019464A1 (en)2014-01-16
WO2012137782A1 (en)2012-10-11
CN103635898A (en)2014-03-12
JP5872183B2 (en)2016-03-01
JP2012221222A (en)2012-11-12
US10055487B2 (en)2018-08-21
CN103635898B (en)2016-08-10

Similar Documents

PublicationPublication DateTitle
Khanam et al.The homophily principle in social network analysis: A survey
US20190012376A1 (en)Preference visualization system and censorship system
Dinakar et al.Common sense reasoning for detection, prevention, and mitigation of cyberbullying
Cvijikj et al.Understanding social media marketing: a case study on topics, categories and sentiment on a Facebook brand page
KR102396413B1 (en)Social big data analysis report automatic provision system using big data and artificial intelligence
WO2012011092A1 (en)System, method and device for intelligent textual conversation system
Onyenwe et al.The impact of political party/candidate on the election results from a sentiment analysis perspective using# AnambraDecides2017 tweets
Kim et al.Opinion-mining methodology for social media analytics
JP5599073B2 (en) Kansei analysis system and program
Gyódi et al.Informing policy with text mining: technological change and social challenges
Wang et al.Content-based classification of sensitive tweets
CN118094239A (en) Image and text rating method, device and computer-readable storage medium
Awrahman et al.Sentiment analysis and opinion mining within social networks using konstanz information miner
Leopairote et al.Software quality in use characteristic mining from customer reviews
KR101074820B1 (en)Recommendation searching system using internet and method thereof
Almagrabi et al.A survey of quality prediction of product reviews
Lu et al.Influence of cognitive and emotional frames on Weibo users' information dissemination behavior in natural disaster emergencies: The moderating effect of psychological distance
Masood et al.Semantic analysis to identify students’ feedback
Hagge et al.Design and implementation of a toolkit for the aspect-based sentiment analysis of tweets
Malik et al.Sentiment analysis on political tweets
Liang et al.Exploring online reviews for user experience modeling
Kaili et al.Improving the Representation Choices of Privacy Policies for End-Users
Chan et al.Social media harvesting
Timm et al.Dynamic analysis of communication processes using twitter data
JP7579553B1 (en) Voice analysis support device, voice analysis support method, and voice analysis support program

Legal Events

DateCodeTitleDescription
STPPInformation on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text:APPLICATION DISPATCHED FROM PREEXAM, NOT YET DOCKETED

STPPInformation on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text:DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

STPPInformation on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text:RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPPInformation on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text:DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

STPPInformation on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text:NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPPInformation on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text:RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPPInformation on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text:FINAL REJECTION MAILED

STPPInformation on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text:RESPONSE AFTER FINAL ACTION FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPPInformation on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text:ADVISORY ACTION MAILED

STCBInformation on status: application discontinuation

Free format text:ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp