US20170199914A1 - Search suggestions of related entities based on co-occurrence and/or fuzzy-score matching - Google Patents

Abstract

A method for generating search suggestions of related entities based on co-occurrence and/or fuzzy score matching is disclosed. The method may be employed in a search system that may include a client/server type architecture. The search system may include a user interface for a search engine in communication with one or more server devices over a network connection. The server device may include an entity extraction module, a fuzzy-score matching module, and an entity co-occurrence knowledge base database. In one embodiment, the search system may process a partial search query from a user and present search suggestions to complete the partial query. In another embodiment, the complete search query may be used as a new search query. The search system may process the new search query, run an entity extraction, find related entities from the entity co-occurrence knowledge base, and present said related entities in a drop down list.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
• This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/920,580, entitled “Search Suggestions of Related Entities Based on Co-Occurrence and/or Fuzzy-Score Matching,” filed on Oct. 22, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/558,159 entitled “Search Suggestions of Related Entities Based on Co-Occurrence and/or Fuzzy-Score Matching,” filed Dec. 2, 2014, which claims a benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Application 61/910,905, filed Dec. 2, 2013, entitled “Search Suggestions of Related Entities Based on Co-Occurrence and/or Fuzzy-Score Matching,” each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
• This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/557,794, entitled “Method for Disambiguating Features in Unstructured Text,” filed Dec. 2, 2014; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/558,300, entitled “Event Detection Through Text Analysis Using Trained Event Template Models,” filed Dec. 2, 2014; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/558,101, entitled “Non-Exclusionary Search Within In-Memory Databases,” filed Dec. 2, 2014; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/558,036, entitled “Search Suggestions Fuzzy-Score Matching and Entity Co-Occurrence,” filed Dec. 2, 2014; each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
TECHNICAL FIELD
• The present disclosure relates generally to computer query processing, and more specifically to electronic search suggestions of related entities based on co-occurrence and/or fuzzy score matching.
BACKGROUND
• Users frequently use search engines for locating information of interest either from the Internet or any database system. Search engines commonly operate by receiving a search query from a user and returning search results to the user. Search results are usually ordered based on the relevance of each returned search result to the search query. Therefore, the quality of the search query may be significantly important for the quality of search results. However, search queries from users, in most cases, may be written incomplete or partial (e.g., the search query may not include enough words to generate a focused set of relevant results and instead generates a large number of irrelevant results), and sometimes misspelled (e.g., Bill Smith may be incorrectly spelled as “Bill Smitth”).
• One common approach to improve the quality of the search results is to enhance the search query. One way to enhance the search query may be by generating possible suggestions based on the user's input. For this, some approaches propose methods for identifying candidate query refinements for a given query from past queries submitted by one or more users. However, these approaches are based on query logs that sometimes may lead the user to results that may not be of interest. There are other approaches using different techniques that may not be accurate enough. Thus, there still exists a need for methods that improve or enhance search queries from users to get more accurate results and also present users with useful related entities of interest as they type the search query.
SUMMARY
• A method for generating search suggestions of related entities based on co-occurrence and/or fuzzy score matching is disclosed. In one aspect of the present disclosure, the method may be employed in a computer search system that may include a client/server type architecture. In one embodiment, the search system may include a user interface to a search engine in communication with one or more server devices over a network connection. The server device may include one or more processors executing instructions for a plurality of special purpose computer modules, including an entity extraction module and a fuzzy-score matching module, as well as an entity co-occurrence knowledge base database. The knowledge base may be built as an in-memory database and may also include other components, such as one or more search controllers, multiple search nodes, collections of compressed data, and a disambiguation module. One search controller may be selectively associated with one or more search nodes. Each search node may be capable of independently performing a fuzzy key search through a collection of compressed data and returning a set of scored results to its associated search controller.
• In another aspect of the present disclosure, the method may include performing partial entity extractions, by an entity extraction module, from provided search queries to identify whether the search query refers to an entity, and if so, to determine the entity type. Furthermore, the method may include generating algorithms, by a fuzzy-score matching module, corresponding to the type of entity extracted and performing a search against an entity co-occurrence knowledge base. Additionally, the query text parts that are not detected as entities are treated as conceptual features, such as topics, facts, and key phrases that can be employed for searching the entity co-occurrence knowledge base. The entity co-occurrence knowledge base, which may already have a repository where entities may be indexed as entities to entities, entities to topics, or entities to facts, among others, may return fast and accurate suggestions to the user to complete the search query.
• In a further aspect of the present disclosure, the completed search query may be used as a new search query. The search system may process the new search query, run an entity extraction, find related entities with the highest scores from the entity co-occurrence knowledge base, and present said related entities in a drop down list that may be useful for the user.
• In one embodiment, a method is disclosed. The method comprises receiving, by an entity extraction computer, user input of partial search query parameters from a user interface, the partial search query parameters having at least one incomplete search query parameter, extracting, by the entity extraction computer, one or more first entities from the partial search query parameters by comparing the partial search query parameters with an entity co-occurrence database having instances of co-occurrence of the one or more first entities in an electronic data corpus and identifying at least one entity type corresponding to the one or more first entities in the partial search query parameters, and selecting, by a fuzzy-score matching computer, a fuzzy matching algorithm for searching the entity co-occurrence database to identify one or more records associated with the partial search query parameters, wherein the fuzzy matching algorithm corresponds to the at least one identified entity type. The method further includes searching, by the fuzzy-score matching computer, the entity co-occurrence database using the selected fuzzy matching algorithm and forming one or more first suggested search query parameters from the one or more records based on the search, presenting, by the fuzzy-score matching computer, the one or more first suggested search query parameters via the user interface, receiving by the entity extraction computer, user selection of the one or more first suggested search query parameters so as to form completed search query parameters, and extracting, by the entity extraction computer, one or more second entities from the completed search query parameters. The method further includes searching, by the entity extraction computer, the entity co-occurrence database to identify one or more entities related to the one or more second entities so as to form one or more second suggested search query parameters, and presenting, by the entity extraction computer, the one or more second suggested search query parameters via the user interface.
• In another embodiment, a system is disclosed. The system comprises one or more server computers having one or more processors executing computer readable instructions for a plurality of computer modules including an entity extraction module configured to receive user input of partial search query parameters from a user interface, the partial search query parameters having at least one incomplete search query parameter, the entity extraction module being further configured to extract one or more first entities from the partial search query parameters by comparing the partial search query parameters with an entity co-occurrence database having instances of co-occurrence of the one or more first entities in an electronic data corpus and identifying at least one entity type corresponding to the one or more first entities in the partial search query parameters. The system further includes a fuzzy-score matching module configured to select a fuzzy matching algorithm for searching the entity co-occurrence database to identify one or more records associated with the partial search query parameters, wherein the fuzzy matching algorithm corresponds to the at least one identified entity type. The fuzzy-score matching module is further configured to search the entity co-occurrence database using the selected fuzzy matching algorithm and form one or more first suggested search query parameters from the one or more records based on the search, and present the one or more first suggested search query parameters via the user interface. Additionally, the entity extraction module is further configured to receive user selection of the one or more first suggested search query parameters so as to form completed search query parameters, extract one or more second entities from the completed search query parameters, search the entity co-occurrence database to identify one or more entities related to the one or more second entities so as to form one or more second suggested search query parameters, and present the one or more second suggested search query parameters via the user interface.
Definitions
• As used here, the following terms may have the following definitions:
• “Entity extraction” refers to computer information processing methods for extracting information such as names, places, and organizations.
• “Corpus” refers to a collection of one or more electronic documents.
• “Features” is any information which is at least partially derived from a document.
• “Module” refers to one or more computer hardware and/or software components suitable for carrying out at least one or more tasks.
• “Fact” refers to objective relationships between features.
• “Entity knowledge base” refers to an electronic database containing features/entities.
• “Query” refers to an electronic request to retrieve information from one or more suitable databases.
• “Topic” refers to a set of thematic information which is at least partially derived from a corpus.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
• The present disclosure can be better understood by referring to the following figures. The components in the figures are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the disclosure. In the figures, reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the different views.
• FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary system environment in which one embodiment of the present disclosure may operate.
• FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating a method for generating search suggestions of related entities based on co-occurrence and/or fuzzy score matching, according to an embodiment.
• FIG. 3 is an example embodiment of a user interface associated with the method described inFIG. 2.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
• The present disclosure is herein described in detail with reference to embodiments illustrated in the drawings, which form a part hereof. Other embodiments may be used and/or other changes may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the present disclosure. The illustrative embodiments described in the detailed description are not meant to be limiting of the subject matter presented herein.
• Reference will now be made to the exemplary embodiments illustrated in the drawings, and specific language will be used herein to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended. Alterations and further modifications of the inventive features illustrated herein, and additional applications of the principles of the inventions as illustrated herein, which would occur to one skilled in the relevant art and having possession of this disclosure, are to be considered within the scope of the present disclosure.
• Embodiments of the present disclosure introduce a novel electronic search suggestion generation mechanism which is different from the existing mechanisms that are based on mining and ranking the activity of the search system's global users' past search queries. The presented search suggestion mechanism, is based on employing an entity co-occurrence knowledge base in its core, along with fuzzy matching modules and entity extraction modules. The entity co-occurrence knowledge base, is an electronic repository where entities may be indexed as entities to entities, entities to topics, or entities to facts among others, and stored in a way to allow faster and weighted responses. In brief, the user partial/complete queries are processed on-the-fly to detect entities (entity extraction), misspelled variations (fuzzy matching) of the entities and other conceptual features. These features are employed to search (fuzzy score matching) entity co-occurrence knowledge base to suggest search queries and possible expansions/suggestions of the accurate entities intended by the user, which will lead to a more accurate search experience. Further, once the suggested entity is chosen, the proposed system would suggest related entities that are present in the entity co-occurrence knowledge base, which will lead to an improved consecutive search experience, as discussed in further detail inFIGS. 1-3 below.
• FIG. 1 is a block diagram of asearch system100 in accordance with the present disclosure. Thesearch system100 may include one ormore user interfaces102 to asearch engine104 in communication with aserver device106 over anetwork108. In this embodiment, thesearch system100 may be implemented in a client/server type architecture; however, thesearch system100 may be implemented using other computer architectures (for example, a stand-alone computer, a mainframe system with terminals, an ASP model, a peer to peer model and the like) and a plurality of networks such as, a local area network, a wide area network, the internet, a wireless network, a mobile phone network and the like.
• Asearch engine104 may include, but is not limited to, an interface via a web-based tool that enables users to locate information on the World Wide Web.Search engine104 may also include tools that enable users to locate information within internal database systems.Server device106, which may be implemented in asingle server device106 or in a distributed architecture across a plurality of server computers, may include anentity extraction module110, a fuzzy-score matching module112, and an entity co-occurrenceknowledge base database114.
• Entity extraction module110 may be a hardware and/or software computer module able to extract and disambiguate on-the-fly independent entities from a given set of queries such as a query string, partial query, structured data and the like. Example of entities may include people, organizations, geographic locations, dates and/or time. During the extraction, one or more feature recognition and extraction algorithms may be employed. Also, a score may be assigned to each extracted feature, indicating the level of certainty of the feature being correctly extracted with the correct attributes. Taking into account the feature attributes, the relative weight or relevance of each of the features may be determined. Additionally, the relevance of the association between features may be determined using a weighted scoring model.
• Fuzzy-score matching module112 may include a plurality of algorithms that may be adjusted or selected according to the type of entity extracted from a given search query. The function of the algorithms may be to determine whether the given search query (input) and suggested searched strings are similar to each other, or approximately match a given pattern string. Fuzzy matching may also be known as fuzzy string matching, inexact matching, and approximate matching.Entity extraction module110 and fuzzy-score matching module112 may work in conjunction with Entityco-occurrence knowledge base114 to generate search suggestions for the user.
• According to various embodiments, entityco-occurrence knowledge base114 may be built, but is not limited to, as an in-memory database and may include components such as one or more search controllers, multiple search nodes, collections of compressed data, and a disambiguation module. One search controller may be selectively associated with one or more search nodes. Each search node may be capable of independently performing a fuzzy key search through a collection of compressed data and returning a set of scored results to its associated search controller.
• Entityco-occurrence knowledge base114 may include related entities based on features and ranked by a confidence score. Various methods for linking the features may be employed, which may essentially use a weighted model for determining which entity types are most important, which have more weight, and, based on confidence scores, determine how confident the extraction of the correct features has been performed.
• FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating an embodiment of amethod200 for generating search suggestions of related entities based on co-occurrence and/or fuzzy score matching.Method200 may be implemented in asearch system100, similar to as described inFIG. 1.
• In one embodiment,method200 may initiate when a user starts typing a search query,step202, in thesearch engine104, as described above inFIG. 1. As the search query is typed,search system100 may perform an on-the-fly process. According to various embodiments, search query may be complete and/or partial, correctly spelled and/or misspelled. Next, a partialentity extraction step204 of search query may be performed. The partialentity extraction step204 may run a quick search against entityco-occurrence knowledge base114 to identify whether the search query includes an entity and, if so, the entity type. According to various embodiments, search query entity may refer to a person, an organization, the location of a place, and a date among others. Once the entity is, a fuzzy-score matching module112 may select a corresponding fuzzy matching algorithm,step206. For example, if search query was identified as an entity that is referring to a person, then fuzzy-score matching module112 may adjust or select the string matching algorithm for persons, which can extract different components of the person's name, including first, middle, last, and title. In another embodiment, if search query was identified as an entity that is referring to an organization, then fuzzy-score matching module112 may adjust or select the string matching algorithm for organizations, which can include identifying terms such as school, university, corp., and inc. Fuzzy-score matching module112 therefore adjusts or selects the string matching algorithm for the type of entity in order to facilitate the search. Once the string matching algorithm is adjusted or selected to correspond to the type of entity, a fuzzy-score matching may be performed instep208.
• In fuzzy-score matching step208, extracted entity or entities, as well as any non-entities, may be searched and compared against entityco-occurrence knowledge base114. Extracted entity or entities may include incomplete names of persons, for example first name and the first character of the last name, abbreviations of organizations, for example “UN” that may stand for “United Nations”, short forms, and nicknames among others. Entityco-occurrence knowledge base114 may already have registered a plurality of records indexed in an structured data, such as entity to entity, entity to topics, and entity to facts index among others. This may allow fuzzy-score matching instep208 to happen expeditiously. Fuzzy-score matching may use, but is not limited to, a common string metric such as Levenshtein distance, strcmp95, ITF scoring, and the like. Levenshtein distance between two words may refer to the minimum number of single-character edits required to change one word into the other.
• Once fuzzy-score matching instep208 step finishes comparing and searching the search query against all records in the entityco-occurrence knowledge base114, the record that dominates the most or is the closest to match the given pattern string of the search query input may be selected as first candidate for a search suggestion,step210. Other records with less proximity to match the given pattern string of the search query input may be placed under the first candidate in a descending order. Search suggestion instep210 may then be presented to the user in a drop down list of possible matches that the user may select to complete the query.
• In another embodiment, after the user selects a match of his/her interest,search system100 may take that selection as a new search query,step212. Subsequently, anentity extraction step214 from said new search query may be performed. During the extraction, one or more feature recognition and extraction algorithms may be employed. Also, a score may be assigned to each extracted feature, indicating the level of certainty of the feature being correctly extracted with the correct attributes. Taking into account the feature attributes, the relative weight or relevance of each of the features may be determined. Additionally, the relevance of the association between features may be determined using a weighted scoring model.Entity extraction module110 may then run a search against entityco-occurrence knowledge base114 to find related entities,step216, based on the co-occurrences with the highest scores. Finally, a drop down list of search suggestions, instep218, including related entities, may be presented to the user before performing the actual search of the data in the electronic document corpus.
• FIG. 3 is an example embodiment of auser interface300 associated with themethod200 for generating search suggestions of related entities based on co-occurrence and/or fuzzy score matching. In this example, a user through asearch engine interface302, similar to that described byFIG. 1, inputs apartial query304 in asearch box306. By a way of illustration and not by way of limitation,partial query304 may be an incomplete name of a person such as “Michael J”, as shown inFIG. 3. It may be considered apartial query304 because the user may not have yet selectedsearch button308, or otherwise submitted thepartial query304 to searchsystem100 to perform an actual search and obtain results.
• Following themethod200, as the user types “Michael J”, theentity extraction module110 performs a quick search on-the-fly of the first word (Michael) against entityco-occurrence knowledge base114 to identify the type of entity, in this example, the entity may refer to the name of a person. Subsequently, fuzzy-score matching module112 may select a string match algorithm tailored for names of persons. Name of persons may be found in databases written in different forms such as using only initials (short forms), or first name and first character of the last name, or first name, initial of the middle name and last name, or any combination thereof. Fuzzy-score matching module112 may use a common string metric such as Levenshtein distance to determine and assign a score to the entity, topic, or fact within entityco-occurrence knowledge base114 that may match the entity “Michael”. In this example, Michael matches with a great amount of records having that name. However, as the user types the following character “J”, fuzzy-score matching module112 may perform another comparison based on Levenshtein distance against all co-occurrences with Michael with the entityco-occurrence knowledge base114. Entityco-occurrence knowledge base114 may then select all possible matches with the highest scores for “Michael J”. For example, fuzzy-score matching module112 may returnsearch suggestions310 to complete “Michael J” such as “Michael Jackson”, “Michael Jordan”, “Michael J. Fox”, or even “Michael Dell” in some cases to the user. The user may then be able to either select from the drop down list one of the persons suggested, or ignore the suggestion and keep typing. Expanding on the aforementioned example, a query like “Michael the basketball player”, would lead to the suggestion of “Michael Jordan”, based on the results returned by searching Entity co-occurrence knowledge base for “Michael” in person entity name variations and “the basketball player” in the co-occurrence features like key phrases, facts, topics, and the like. Another example can be “Alexander the actor”, would lead to the suggestion of “Alexander Polinsky”. As those skilled in the art will realize, the existing search platforms cannot provide suggestions generated in the aforementioned manner.
• In this embodiment, the user may select “Michael Jordan” from the drop down list to complete thepartial query304, as indicated inFIG. 3. Said selection may then be processed as anew search query312 bysearch system100. Subsequently, an entity extraction from saidnew search query312 may be performed. During the extraction, one or more feature recognition and extraction algorithms may be employed. Also, a score may be assigned to each extracted feature, indicating the level of certainty of the feature being correctly extracted with the correct attributes. Taking into account the feature attributes, the relative weight or relevance of each of the features may be determined. Additionally, the relevance of the association between features may be determined using a weighted scoring model.Entity extraction module110 may then run a search for “Michael Jordan” against entityco-occurrence knowledge base114 to find related entities based on the co-occurrences with the highest scores. Finally, a drop down list ofsearch suggestions314, including related entities, may be presented to the user before performing the actual search by clicking on thesearch button308. The foregoing system and method described inFIGS. 1-3 may be fast and convenient for the user since the user may find useful relationships.
• While various aspects and embodiments have been disclosed, other aspects and embodiments are contemplated. The various aspects and embodiments disclosed are for purposes of illustration and are not intended to be limiting, with the true scope and spirit being indicated by the following claims.
• The foregoing method descriptions and the process flow diagrams are provided merely as illustrative examples and are not intended to require or imply that the steps of the various embodiments must be performed in the order presented. As will be appreciated by one of skill in the art the steps in the foregoing embodiments may be performed in any order. Words such as “then,” “next,” etc. are not intended to limit the order of the steps; these words are simply used to guide the reader through the description of the methods. Although process flow diagrams may describe the operations as a sequential process, many of the operations can be performed in parallel or concurrently. In addition, the order of the operations may be re-arranged. A process may correspond to a method, a function, a procedure, a subroutine, a subprogram, etc. When a process corresponds to a function, its termination may correspond to a return of the function to the calling function or the main function.
• The various illustrative logical blocks, modules, circuits, and algorithm steps described in connection with the embodiments disclosed here may be implemented as electronic hardware, computer software, or combinations of both. To clearly illustrate this interchangeability of hardware and software, various illustrative components, blocks, modules, circuits, and steps have been described above generally in terms of their functionality. Whether such functionality is implemented as hardware or software depends upon the particular application and design constraints imposed on the overall system. Skilled artisans may implement the described functionality in varying ways for each particular application, but such implementation decisions should not be interpreted as causing a departure from the scope of the present invention.
• Embodiments implemented in computer software may be implemented in software, firmware, middleware, microcode, hardware description languages, or any combination thereof. A code segment or machine-executable instructions may represent a procedure, a function, a subprogram, a program, a routine, a subroutine, a module, a software package, a class, or any combination of instructions, data structures, or program statements. A code segment may be coupled to another code segment or a hardware circuit by passing and/or receiving information, data, arguments, parameters, or memory contents. Information, arguments, parameters, data, etc. may be passed, forwarded, or transmitted via any suitable means including memory sharing, message passing, token passing, network transmission, etc.
• The actual software code or specialized control hardware used to implement these systems and methods is not limiting of the invention. Thus, the operation and behavior of the systems and methods were described without reference to the specific software code being understood that software and control hardware can be designed to implement the systems and methods based on the description here.
• When implemented in software, the functions may be stored as one or more instructions or code on a non-transitory computer-readable or processor-readable storage medium. The steps of a method or algorithm disclosed here may be embodied in a processor-executable software module which may reside on a computer-readable or processor-readable storage medium. A non-transitory computer-readable or processor-readable media includes both computer storage media and tangible storage media that facilitate transfer of a computer program from one place to another. A non-transitory processor-readable storage media may be any available media that may be accessed by a computer. By way of example, and not limitation, such non-transitory processor-readable media may comprise RAM, ROM, EEPROM, CD-ROM or other optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other tangible storage medium that may be used to store desired program code in the form of instructions or data structures and that may be accessed by a computer or processor. Disk and disc, as used here, include compact disc (CD), laser disc, optical disc, digital versatile disc (DVD), floppy disk, and Blu-ray disc where disks usually reproduce data magnetically, while discs reproduce data optically with lasers. Combinations of the above should also be included within the scope of computer-readable media. Additionally, the operations of a method or algorithm may reside as one or any combination or set of codes and/or instructions on a non-transitory processor-readable medium and/or computer-readable medium, which may be incorporated into a computer program product.
• The preceding description of the disclosed embodiments is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the present invention. Various modifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined here may be applied to other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown here but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the following claims and the principles and novel features disclosed here.

Claims (20)

What is claimed is:

1. A method comprising:

identifying, by a server, a first entity in an incomplete search query parameter based on querying a local in-memory database for an entity type corresponding to the first entity;

searching, by the server, the local in-memory database via a fuzzy matching process corresponding to the entity type such that a record is located, wherein the record is associated with the incomplete search query parameter based on a confidence score and a ranking based on the confidence score;

sending, by the server, a first suggested search query parameter to the client as formed based on the record;

forming, by the server, a completed search query parameter based on a selection from the client, wherein the selection selects the first suggested search query parameter;

extracting, by the server, a second entity from the completed search query parameter;

identifying, by the server, a third entity in the local in-memory database, wherein the third entity is related to the second entity; and

sending, by the server, a second suggested search query parameter to the client, wherein the second suggested search query parameter is based on the third entity.

2. The method ofclaim 1, further comprising:

extracting, by the server, a feature from the local in-memory database; and

assigning, by the server, a score to the feature, wherein the score indicates a level of certainty of the feature being extracted with a correct attribute.

3. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the searching is before a search query is finalized, wherein the search query includes the incomplete search query parameter.

4. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the record comprises a conceptual feature.

5. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the first suggested search query parameter comprises a plurality of first suggested search query parameters, wherein the method further comprising:

sorting, by the server, the first suggested search query parameters in a descending order based on a proximity of a match to the incomplete search query parameter.

6. The method ofclaim 4, wherein the sending of the first suggested search query parameter to the client is such that the first suggested search query parameter is presented on the client in a drop down list.

7. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the local in-memory is indexed.

8. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the local in-memory includes an entity-to-entity index.

9. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the local in-memory includes an entity-to-topic index.

10. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the local in-memory includes an entity-to-facts index.

11. A system comprising:

a server configured to:

identify a first entity in an incomplete search query parameter based on querying a local in-memory database for an entity type corresponding to the first entity;

search the local in-memory database via a fuzzy matching process corresponding to the entity type such that a record is located, wherein the record is associated with the incomplete search query parameter based on a confidence score and a ranking based on the confidence score;

send a first suggested search query parameter to the client as formed based on the record;

form a completed search query parameter based on a selection from the client, wherein the selection selects the first suggested search query parameter;

extract a second entity from the completed search query parameter;

identify a third entity in the local in-memory database, wherein the third entity is related to the second entity; and

send a second suggested search query parameter to the client, wherein the second suggested search query parameter is based on the third entity.

12. The system ofclaim 11, wherein the server is configured to:

extract a feature from the local in-memory database;

assign a score to the feature, wherein the score indicates a level of certainty of the feature being extracted with a correct attribute.

13. The system ofclaim 11, wherein the server is configured to perform the search before a search query is finalized, wherein the search query includes the incomplete search query parameter.

14. The system ofclaim 11, wherein the record comprises a conceptual feature.

15. The system ofclaim 11, wherein the first suggested search query parameter comprises a plurality of first suggested search query parameters, wherein the server is configured to:

sort the first suggested search query parameters in a descending order based on a proximity of a match to the incomplete search query parameter.

16. The system ofclaim 14, wherein the server is configured to send the first suggested search query parameter to the client such that the first suggested search query parameter is presented on the client in a drop down list.

17. The system ofclaim 11, wherein the local in-memory database is indexed.

18. The system ofclaim 11, wherein the local in-memory database includes an entity-to-entity index.

19. The system ofclaim 11, wherein the local in-memory database includes an entity-to-topic index.

20. The system ofclaim 11, wherein the local in-memory database includes an entity-to-facts index.

Images