The present invention relates to tissue-damage rehabilitation devices and methods. In particular the invention relates to the creation of external support for damaged tissue, in order to support the tissue during rehabilitation. More specifically, the invention relates to the method, device, and use according to the preamble portions of Claims1,15, and18.
As is known, the care of serious damage to a synovial joint resulting from accidents is challenging. For example, falling accidents often result in serious damage to the ankle, which is caused by the ankle bone impacting the cartilage surface of the tibia, which in the worst case can even lead to the crushing of the lower end of the tibia. Recovery from injuries like those described usually takes several months. In typical care following a falling accident, the damaged ankle is repaired operatively and fixed, i.e. supported rigidly, using, for example, so-called pilon rings and similar care accessories. However, in order to recover to full functionality, the cartilage requires nutrition, the transportation of which—unlike that in other tissues—is based on the tissue being loaded in cycles, so that fluid dynamics appear inside the cartilage. The recovery of cartilage is described in detail in the publication, ‘Influence of cyclic loading on the nutrition of articular cartilage’ (O'Hara B., Urban J., & Maroudas A., Ann Rheum. Dis. 1990 July; 49(7): 536-539). If mobilization that transports nutrients is not arranged, the cartilage surface repaired by the operation may be destroyed, which will be followed in a couple of years by a state corresponding to osteoarthritis, i.e. invalidity. Precisely because osteoarthritis patients are mostly young people or those of working age, such as building workers, invalidizing osteoarthritis leads to not only personal misfortune, but also a significant economic cost.
In the publication ‘Articulated external fixation of the ankle: minimizing motion resistance by accurate axis alignment’ (Bottas M., March. L., & Brown T., Journal of Miomecanics, Vol. 32, No. 1, January 1999, pp. 63-70), it is stated that factors promoting recovery from, for example, the ankle-fracture injuries referred to above are protection from loads, early post-operative movement, a reduction in splinter fractures, and minimal disturbance of the injured area. For this reason, post-operative supports for damaged joints have been developed, so that in aftercare it will be possible to take into account mobilization of the joint as a precondition for recovery. However, it should be noted that, besides the mobilization of a damaged joint, its correct timing is of considerable significance in the success of rehabilitation. For example, the mobilization of an ankle must be started already two days after an operation. Correspondingly, a movement of the wrong kind can have disadvantageous consequences. It is therefore of decisive importance to find to find the joint's anatomically correct path, in order to minimize the resistance to motion and avoid sudden damage caused by the wrong kind of movement. Thus, significant expectations are directed to post-operative supports, in relation to both being able to be rapidly installed and to creating the correct type of path.
Many external supports are known. However, the majority of supports intended for the aftercare of synovial joint injuries are either rigid, i.e. the supports do not permit therapeutic movement, or supports permitting movement, the motion permitted by which is typically a rough approximation of the real movement of the joint. In a hinge joint, such the ankle, movement takes place around only a single axis of rotation, with a limited extent of movement. This is the simplest model of a moving joint, due to which it is used as an illustrative example in this connection. In other types of synovial joint, rotation and sliding in the direction of several axes or planes of movement can take place simultaneously. These can be controlled equally by means of the technology disclosed here. Rigid supports are, among others, Ilizahrov rings, which are external supports attached on both sides of the damaged joint. Ilizahrov rings are a way of implementing joint support that penetrates the tissue, i.e. it is invasive. In the method, the rings are attached to the patient's bone by using tensioning cables and bone screws. Ilizahrov rings and their use are described in greater detail in the publications ‘Pilon fractures. Treatment protocol based on severity of soft tissue injury’ (Watson J. T., Moed B. R., Karges D. E., Cramer K. E.. Clin. Orthop. 2000; 375: 78-90) and ‘Two-ring hybrid external fixation of distal tibial fractures: A review of47cases’ (Ristiniemi J., Flinkkilä T., Hyvonen P., Lakovaara M., Pakarinen H., Biancari F., Jalovaara P., J. Trauma 2007; 62: 174-183), the contents of which is included in this as a reference. In addition, non-invasive rigid supports are known, such as traditional plaster casts and similar. Supports permitting movement have been created, for example, by arranged external hinge-type plates, with the aid of which an attempt has been made to imitate the movement of the damaged joint. An example of the said plate in cases like the ankle fracture described above is a kind of pedal, on top of which the base of the foot is placed and which is adjusted to permit only such a tilting movement as would be natural for a healthy ankle.
Alternative methods are known for defining the natural movement of a synovial joint. In camera-based methods, the movement is recorded by using, for example, a video camera and alignment marks, which are attached to the object to be moved. After recording the movement, the preferably digital video material is analysed using special software and the movement information obtained with the aid of the alignment marks is captured, in order to form the path of movement. This method is utilized widely, for example, in sports applications and in the film industry, for which the technology was originally developed. Because the method does not require physical contact with the patient, the method is quite user-friendly from the patient's point of view. The accuracy of the method varies from the accuracy required for making animations to the accuracy required for quality control. However, in the final resort the accuracy of the method depends on the resolution of the camera and on the measurement volume used. Typically, sufficiently accurate information is obtained by means of the method for animation of the movement of an entire limb, but this technology does not provide an answer to the movements of the bones that act as counter-surfaces in an individual joint. A drawback of the method is that, in terms of the area of the theme of the invention, the method cannot be used to determine reliably the movement of the bones under the actual tissues, but rather the movement of the tissue on top of the bones. In addition, these methods do not reveal the fine-dynamic flexing under the soft tissue, i.e. the dynamics between the bones. Because it has not been possible to accurately define the precise anatomic movement, it has also not been possible, on the basis of these methods, to design anatomically personalized external supports.
An alternative to camera-based methods are three-dimensional or radiographic methods, in which a three-dimensional model of the bones is formed on the basis of either computer tomography (CT) or magnetic-resonance imaging (MRI). The methods are suitable for modelling the shape of an individual bone. MRI is not, however, suitable for situations in which steel screws or other attachment means in the area of the joint already attached for old injuries or installed for the care of a new injury. In the said cases, CT imaging would be a possible method, but it suffers from imaging interference caused by metals and from the great radiation stress caused to the patient.
In known applications, a damaged synovial joint and its part are modelled on the basis of CT or MRI, when a virtual kinetic model corresponding to the damaged joint is obtained. This solution has been typically used in early motion analysis studies of cases of injury, because the technology used has been readily available in a hospital environment. For example, publication US2008312659 discloses a method for manufacturing a prosthesis, in which a patient-specific image, which is used as an aid in the manufacture of the prosthesis, is formed from data obtained from MRI imaging. For its part, publication US2007118243 discloses a method, in which a computer-based model, which is exploited to manufacture implants, prostheses, and similar, is created from data obtained on the patient's anatomy in CT imaging. Though CT and MRI-based methods are indeed suitable for the manufacture of patient-specific artificial joints and other implants, the use of the said methods does not achieve sufficient accuracy as would permit preserving and saving a patient's own joint after injury. Traditionally, it has been possible to achieve an accuracy of about 10 millimetres, whereas achieving a good result would require an accuracy of at least 1 . . . 3 millimetres, preferably at least 0.5 millimetres. Typically, significant swelling also occurs in the area of a limb joint after injury, which reduces the accuracy if the definition of movement or the support is based on skin contact.
In general, significantly unknown tolerances relate to the technology used in the creation of bone models, which derive from the imaging quality and the grey-tome values available in sectioning. In addition, the joints, locations, and attitudes of three-dimensional models are fitted together visually in a 3D environment, which further reduces the method's reliability and repeatability. Tolerance errors made in the creation of bone models accumulate, when the attachment points are designed on the basis of the models. All in all, at least up until now, the CT and MRI-based three-dimensional method have not been applied, because sufficient accuracy cannot be achieved using the methods.
Thus, the problems of the prior art are related to the determining of the path of a damaged joint. Because each joint, tissue, and injury is different, a statistical approximation and present modelling methods have not been able to provide a solution for creating an anatomically personalized support. More specifically, using present post-operative external supports, i.e. supports external to the body, it has not been possible to place artificial or auxiliary joints sufficiently precisely on the paths of movement of the joint, so that the mobilization of an injured limb or similar will not succeed, due to which the cartilage of the joint will not receive nutrition reliably. As stated, in in mechanical design, as is known, reference geometries can be utilized, either by creating them in a three-dimensional 3D-CAD system, or by bringing a camera-based digital geometry to the design system, by using various methods and various formats. Challenges generally arise in the combination of a reliable design geometry, referencing digitalization, and a real application. Thus, the known joint supports have been rigid, which is not optimal from the point of view of the recovery of a joint.
The external support devices on the market, which a priori permit movement to a limited extent around a single axis, are in point of departure universal-type devices. It has therefore not been possible to take into account the size of the patient or soft-tissue damage, which are important in terms of avoiding complications. In these cases, the attachment spikes must be placed in an area that has been very precisely defined beforehand, while the location of the external axis cannot be determined other than visually with the aid of transillumination. The precision then remains unavoidably poor and the path small.
It is an object of the present invention to solve at least some of the drawbacks of the prior art and to create an improved method for creating a anatomically personalized and mobilizing external support for rehabilitating a synovial joint.
The object of the invention is achieved by means of a new type of method for creating an anatomically personalized and mobilizing external support for supporting a synovial joint between two bone groups in such a manner that it can be moved, in which method the kinetic dynamics of the joint are measured with the aid of a part of the external support attached invasively to at least one of the said bone groups, on the basis of which the external support is arranged between the bone groups.
According to one embodiment of the method according to the invention, the movement of the joint is measured using a co-ordinate measurement device and the measurement is performed from invasively attached auxiliary frames, which form part of the external support and CAD models of which are arranged in a CAD environment. According to the embodiment, the measurement data of the co-ordinate measurement device and the CAD models are combined in the CAD system, in order to model the path of the joint and the external support.
According to one embodiment of the invention, a CAD model is arranged of the external auxiliary joint permitting the modelled path and this is placed in the CAD environment between the auxiliary frames, on the same axis as that of the modelled path of movement, and, with the aid of the CAD models, at least one adapter component is arranged, which is fitted to combine the auxiliary frame and the auxiliary joint.
More specifically, the method according to the invention is characterized by what is stated in the characterizing portion of Claim1.
The object of the invention is achieved, on the other hand, by means of a new type of external support to be fitted between the bone groups, which comprises at least one first external modular auxiliary frame, which is attached by invasive attachment means to the first bone group, at least one second external modular auxiliary frame, which is attached to the second bone group, at least one external modular auxiliary joint, which is arranged between the first and second auxiliary frame, as well as at least one personalized adapter component, which is arranged to connect the auxiliary joint to the auxiliary frame.
More specifically, the external support according to the invention is characterized by what is stated in the characterizing portion of Claim15.
The object of the invention is achieved, on the other hand, by means of a new type of use, in which part of an invasively attached external support is used in defining the path of the joint to be supported.
Considerable advantages are achieved with the aid of the invention. This is because, by means of the method according to the invention, a particularly accurate model of the movement of the damaged joint is achieved, thanks to which it is possible to design, manufacture, and install a precisely anatomically personalized and mobilizing external support. Because a precise anatomical correspondence with the patient's own joint is obtained from the mobilizing external support, the movements to be performed in post-operative rehabilitation will imitate the natural path of movement of the joint. Thus, thanks to this movement, the joint will receive nutrition promoting recovery and the wrong kind of movement will not cause additional damage to the joint. In terms of the success of later rehabilitation, both the preservation of muscle control and the prevention of contraction (shrinkage) of the tendons are very important. Complete locking of a joint for even a few weeks will lead to detectable movement restrictions and also to immobilization osteoporosis. However, with the aid of the invention these problems can be reduced. The accurate patient-specific path of movement of the joint also permits the use of soft fillers as a basis for the regeneration of the structural parts of the joint. Thus, for the duration of recovery, the path of movement of an extensively damaged joint is controlled using the external support device according to the invention, in such a way that the movement takes place the whole time in a controlled manner, without a deforming force being directed to the soft medium before it has regenerated sufficiently to form a load-bearing cartilage and bone under the cartilage. At the same time, the invention permits controlled movement exercises of the joint, for example, as aftercare of ligament repairs.
Because, in the method according to the invention, it is possible to use devices, which have been demonstrated to be reliable in other connections, the performance of each sub-area of the method has been optimized separately. This is because according to one embodiment the supports to be attached to the bone group are Ilizahroz rings, which are a particularly advantageous way of attaching external structures to limbs. Correspondingly, according to one embodiment the measurement of the path of movement is performed using a co-ordinate measuring device, which has been shown in an engineering-shop environment to be suitable for even demanding quality-control and even calibration applications. Thus, the method can be implemented using very different device combinations, the parts of which have been proved to be good in other connections. Thus, the method is not dependent on new technologies untried in practice.
According to one embodiment, the external support's auxiliary joint is adjustable, so that the movement permitted for a joint that has been operated on can be adjusted as recovery progresses. For example, the bone groups surrounding an injured joint can be locked to be immobile for a couple of days after the operation, after which by adjusting the external support's auxiliary joint rehabilitation can be commenced in stages according to the conditions for recovery, in the cases of both the extent of movement and the degrees of freedom of the selected movements.
In addition, the invention permits the attachment spikes to be placed entirely freely, so that, for example, the damaged areas of the soft tissues can be left free, thus reducing the risk of complications. This also provides a possibility of choice to exploit the points achieving the best skeleton grip in the bone attachments and both to accelerate the operation as well as to reduce the amount of x-rays used in the operating theatre.
In the following, some embodiments of the invention are examined in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which
FIG. 1 presents a person's ankle, to which an external support, created using the method according to the invention, has been fitted,
FIG. 2 presents a seating used in measurements, and
FIG. 3 presents a CAD view from the design of a support according to one embodiment of the invention.
The method according to the present invention can be applied to the care of numerous different joint injuries. The method according to the invention is particularly suitable for, but not restricted to, the care of traumatic changes. Because joint injuries are caused to a very great extent as a result of falling accidents, the method according to the invention will be described hereinafter in the case of an example of an ankle fracture, because it is an anatomically simple subject. Of course, the method according to the invention is also suitable for creating the external supports required in the case of other joint injuries. A typical pilon fracture is associated with a falling accident that has taken place due to negligence in work safety, or in connection with a physical hobby, as a result of which the patient's ankle bone has impacted the cartilage surface of the tibia, which has resulted in damage to the joint between the ankle bone and the tibia. In the worst case, the entire under surface of the tibia will have shattered.
As shown inFIG. 1, the damaged joint40 is surrounded by at least two bone groups: afirst bone group10 and asecond bone group20. In the case of the example of an embodiment described here, thefirst bone group10 is the tibia and thesecond bone group20 is the ankle bone and the heel bone connected to it. In this connection, a group of bones, which consists of at least one bone, is regarded as being a bone group. In the case of the ankle-fracture example, thefirst bone group10 thus comprises only a single bone and thesecond bone group20 comprises two bones. Immediately after the injury has occurred, the patient's ankle is typically fixed, i.e. supported rigidly using splints, a plaster cast, an external attachment device (external fixator), or some other rapidly applicable means, by which movement of the ankle is prevented. Often, swelling caused by the injury prevents the fracture pieces from being immediately returned to their places and the related internal attachment using screws, spikes, plates, or other implants. If the soft-tissue situation permits, the ankle is operated on, in connection with which the pieces of cartilage are lifted off the tibia and returned to their original location. Traditionally, in the operation fixation is performed using an Ilizahrov or other rigid support device, which is known.
According to the invention, in connection with the operation,auxiliary frames12,22 are placed around the damaged joint40, with the aid of which an anatomically personalized and mobilizing external support can be designed, manufactured, and installed outside the joint40, which will permit the joint40 to be able to be moved to the correct extent in the correct directions, according to all the directions of movement required and measured in each joint. The auxiliary frames12,22 are attached invasively to thebone groups10,20 surrounding the joint40, for example, using bone screws or various suitable cable arrangements. In this connection, the term invasive refers to a part penetrating tissue and the term external refers to a part outside the tissue. In the example ofFIG. 1, two invasive bone screws21, which form the second attachment means, are attached to thesecond bone group20. The firstauxiliary frame12, which is attached to thefirst bone group10 invasively with the aid of the first attachment means, which comprise the bone screws and cables according toFIG. 1, is fitted to thefirst bone group10 surrounding the joint40. The firstauxiliary frame12 is preferably, for example, an Ilizahrov ring arrangement, which is easy to fit to the tibia according to the ankle embodiment. In the attachment of the auxiliary frame, the actual attachment point is, according to the invention, of no particular importance: the attachment point, for example for bone screws, is chosen on the conditions of the best possible contact and the most accommodating soft-tissue situation. Also the position and attitude of theauxiliary frame12,22 can be selected quite freely, but, however, in such a way that the distance of the closest point of the auxiliary frame from the coming external auxiliary joint is the smallest possible, either by visual estimate or by calculation.
As can further be seen fromFIG. 1, the second auxiliary frame22 fitted to thesecond bone group20 comprises, according to one embodiment, the heads of the bone screws21. Alternatively, the second auxiliary frame22 could be, for example, a horseshoe-shaped ring resembling an Ilizharov ring, which is attached to the second bone group by bone screws21. Generally, the auxiliary frame according to the invention can be an arbitrary component, which can be fixed to the bone group and to which an auxiliary joint30 oradapter32, which will be dealt with in greater detail later, can be fitted externally.
Once the injured joint40 has been repaired in an operation and the external auxiliary frames12,22 has been fitted to thebone groups10,20 surrounding the joint40, the movement of the joint40 is modelled for the design of a correct type of mobilizing external support. Immediately after the operation, the joint40 is, however, fixed temporarily, for example for a couple of days, by securing the auxiliary frames12,22 to each other by a suitable intermediate part. According to the invention, prior to this the movement is modelled preferably using a digitalization device, by means of which numerical and correct information is created. In this connection, the term digitalization refers to a device, by means of which movement information can be captured from a physical object and data, such as a set of co-ordinates, for processing is created. According to one preferred embodiment, the digitalization device is a co-ordinate device, for example the MicroScribe MX, by means of which in the best case accuracy of as much as 0.05 millimetres can be obtained. Alternatively, it is possible to use, for example, a three-dimensional laser scanner, the use of which has, however, usability problems, because the application of the measurement information created using the scanner in an external set of co-ordinates is challenging. When using a co-ordinate measurement device, the measuring device and the subject of the measurement must be placed mutually in the same set of co-ordinates. In practice, the co-ordinate measurement device and the firstauxiliary frame12 are supported, in the ankle embodiment presented, for example, in an operating theatre on furniture in such a way that the distance or attitude between them does not move during the measurement. In order to facilitate the measurement, seatings50, in which there is arecess51 for the measuring head of the co-ordinate measurement device (FIGS. 1 and 2), are preferably fitted to the auxiliary frames12,22. Thanks to therecess51, the measuring head of the co-ordinate measurement device cannot slide away from the measuring point, in order to improve the reliability and repeatability of the measurement. AsFIG. 2 shows, theseating50 is, according to one embodiment a stud, which is attached to a hole in theauxiliary frame12,22, and in which there is arecess51 or cavity with the same diameter as the measuring head, into which the measuring head must be placed in the correct attitude. The left-hand side ofFIG. 2 shows theseating50, which is equipped with along recess51, so that the arm of the measuring head must be correctly aligned when the measuring head touches the bottom of therecess51. The right-hand side ofFIG. 2 show aseating50 equipped with ashallow recess51. In bothseatings50, there is a hole on the opposite side to therecess51, which is arranged to receive the attachment element, by means of which theseating50 is attached to the measurement object. The firstauxiliary frame12,22 is preferably designed in such a way that the measurement points of theseatings50 placed in the holes are mutually on the same plane. Alternatively, a corresponding cavity orrecess51 for the measuring head of the measurement device, promoting the measurement, can be machined or otherwise precision-manufactured in theauxiliary frame12,22.
In the measuring process, the intention is to obtain information of the kinetic dynamics of the joint, i.e. as to how the bone groups around the joint move relative to each other, by means of the joint. More specifically, in the measurement, the movement between the first andsecond bone groups10,20 in respect to the joint40 is measured with the aid of theauxiliary frames12,22 attached to thebone groups10,20 by attachment means21. In the ankle embodiment described above, the co-ordinates of the measurement points of the auxiliary frame12 (Ilizahrov ring) attached to thefirst bone group10, i.e. the tibia, are measured first. In the case of the example, at least three, preferably more, seatings50 are attached to the firstauxiliary frame12. Because the firstauxiliary frame12 is designed in such a way that therecesses51 in theseatings50 are mutually on the same plane, it is easy, on the basis of the measurements to form a reference-geometry plane, which depicts the surface of the firstauxiliary frame12, to which the auxiliary joint30 is attached. Thus, there must be at least three measurement points, in order to form each spatial plane. The measurement points are preferably more than three, because in that case measurement errors can be evened out by approximating the results computationally when forming the planes. In addition, it is good to repeat the number required, in order to eliminate measurement errors. In the case of the example above of an ankle joint, this is simplified to become a hinge joint.
Once the locations of the measurement points of theauxiliary frame12 of thefirst bone group10 have been measured, the path of the measurement point or points of the second auxiliary frame22 relative to the firstauxiliary frame12 is measured. The path can be measured, for example, in such a way that the joint40—in the case of the example the ankle—is moved in a natural path relative to the joint40, during which time at least three values are measured for the measurement point of the second auxiliary frame22. Preferably as many attitudes as possible of the joint40 on the path are measured repeatedly, in order to eliminate measurement errors and to determine the precise length of the path. The second auxiliary frame22 is also preferably equipped with aseating50 receiving the measuring head, especially preferably with aseating50 according to the example on the left-hand side ofFIG. 2.
After, or during the measurements, the measurement data is transferred to a CAD system. According to one preferred embodiment of the invention, the measurement data is transferred from the co-ordinate measuring device directly to the CAD system, either through a common interface, or with the aid of separate software. Alternatively, the information can also be recorded in a file, from which the measurements points are loaded as points into the CAD program. Once the measurement information is in the CAD system, the kinetic dynamics of the joint40 are modelled on the basis of the information. In the modelling of thekinetic dynamics60, the movement of the joint40 can be approximated and modelled very accurately on the basis of the measurements obtained from the second auxiliary frame22, by arranging thecurve64 to run through the measurement points (not imaginary), as shown inFIG. 3. On the basis of thecurve64, in the case of a hinge joint, theplane63 of movement and thecentre point62,axis61, and extreme points (ends of the curve) of the rotational motion can then be determined. In a joint comprising several degrees of freedom, each rotation and sliding movement combination is defined, as well as their mutual rhythm in each plane in a corresponding manner. On the basis of the measurement results obtained from the firstauxiliary frame12, it is possible, on the other hand, to create a reference plane, relative to which thesecond bone group20, i.e. the second auxiliary frame22, moves (not shown). The reference plane is created with the aid of at least three measured points, in which case the three points are set to connect the plane. The computational creation of paths of motion, planes, and axis on the basis of measured points is, as such, known.
According to the invention, a CAD model is arranged from theauxiliary frames12,22. In this connection, the term arranging, refers to the fact that the CAD model is created either by procuring it in a ready-made form from a databank, in which the component has been modelled beforehand, or by forming a CAD model on the basis of an existing component. In terms of the performance of the invention, it is preferable for there to be a finished CAD model of the auxiliary frame, as well as of the components to be used, already prior to measuring, so that the operating time will not be taken up in modelling. According to a particularly preferred embodiment, the components used, such as the auxiliary frames12,22, the attachment means21, and the auxiliary joint30 are standard components, of which there are ready-made CAD models. The measurement points are also preferably modelled into the CAD models of theauxiliary frames12,22, so that the adapting of the models to the measured plane or measured axis will be easy. In addition, a CAD model is arranged of the auxiliary joint30 (FIG. 1) used in the external support. The auxiliary joint30 is preferably of a general-purpose model and a simple, readily available hinge-type pin joint, the path permitted by which can be limited mechanically. The hinge component can further be shaped according to modelling, in such a way that it permits sliding of the rotational centre point and the alteration of the radius of the path. This is necessary, for example, when modelling the movements of the knee.
Once thekinetic dynamics60 of the joint40 have been created in the CAD system, the arranged CAD models of theauxiliary frames12,22 are adapted to the path in the CAD system. In the case of the ankle example, the surface of the firstauxiliary frame12 closest to the second auxiliary frame22 is placed, on the basis of the measurement results, in an attitude on the created plane (not shown), in which the measurement points coincide with each other. Correspondingly, the CAD model of the auxiliary joint30 is placed on the path, in such a way that the axis of the auxiliary joint30 and theaxis61 of the path coincide, so that the CAD model of the auxiliary joint30 simulates the joint permitted by thepath64 brought into the CAD system. Preferably, kinetic centre point of the model of the auxiliary joint30 coincides with thecentre point62 of the modelled motion. Once the length of the path is known on the basis of the model of the path, the extent of motion of the real auxiliary joint30 is adjusted preferably to correspond to the measured natural extent of motion of the joint40. Correspondingly, the CAD model of the second auxiliary frame22 is aligned in place in the CAD system on the basis of the model of the path. The modelled measurement point or points are also preferably modelled in the CAD model of the second auxiliary frame22.
Once the auxiliary frames12,22 and the auxiliary joint30 have been adapted in the CAD system to the created path model, thenecessary adapter components31,32 for connecting the auxiliary joint30 to the auxiliary frames12,22 (FIG. 1) are modelled in the system. In some cases, the auxiliary joint30 can be adapted to be connected directly to theauxiliary frame12,22, in which case only asingle adapter component31,32 will be required. According to one embodiment, as shown inFIG. 1, anadapter component31,32 is designed between both the first and the secondauxiliary frame12,22 and the joint30. It is particularly advantageous to design theadapter components31,32 directly in the CAD system to connect the joint30 and theauxiliary frames12,22, in which case drawings for manufacture can be obtained especially easily from the CAD models of thecomponents31,32. According to one embodiment of the invention, theadapter components31,32 are manufactured using a 3D printer, or by some other instant manufacturing method, by means of which it is possible to manufacture, for example, polymer parts directly with the aid of CAD models. Alternatively, it is possible to use some other CAD-CAM system, by means of which a component of sufficient strength can be created, and which can be manufactured rapidly. For example, the component can be machined from aluminium in a machining centre, or manufactured instantly using some other technologies. The manufacture of pieces directly on the basis of CAD models is, as such, known.
Once theadapter components31,32 have been manufactured, they are fitted to the correspondingauxiliary frames12,22. The auxiliary joint30 is fitted between theadapter components31,32, in which case an anatomically personalized and mobilizing external support is created outside the joint40 between the first andsecond bone groups10,20. As stated, the auxiliary joint30 is preferably adjustable, in such a way that the angle between it and the movement of the actual joint40 can be adjusted. Immediately after the operation, the auxiliary joint30 is adjusted, preferably in such a way that the movement between the first andsecond bone groups10,20 does not permit the bone groups to fix. During the period of post-operative rehabilitation, the path and angle of the movement permitted by the auxiliary joint30 is adjusted on the basis of the CAD model of the path to be anatomically correct and the extent of the paths of motion can be adjusted as required as care progresses.
According to one embodiment, the method according to the invention is used in connection with a joint operation, in which operation a soft mass suitable for the purpose is utilized, which is arranged to differentiate in different support tissues when the joint experiences manipulation on the standard path. In the embodiment, the joint is operated on using the technique described, in which the destroyed joint surfaces are removed and is replaced by a mass like that described, which can differentiate into different types of tissue. In the embodiment, an external support according to the invention, which is particularly advantageous in connection with precisely the said mass, is arranged for the joint that has been operated on.
The embodiment described above, in which there is an anatomically personalized external support, designed, manufactured, and installed according to the invention, for repairing an ankle injury, is only one manifestation of the invention. The method according to the invention can also be applied to the rehabilitation of other joints, for instance the knee, elbow joint, or, for example, the wrist. Thus, the embodiment depicted above is not intended as a limiting specification, but rather as an exemplary description. One skilled in the art will naturally adapt the method, device, and use according to the invention to other than human patients. The present invention can also be implemented in a sequence differing from that described here. For example, the joint can be operated on and supported in the operation rigidly in a suitable manner, e.g., using a Ilizahrov ring. Once the joint permits movement, the rigid support can be removed and the invasive structures, i.e. auxiliary frames, can be utilized in measuring the movement of the joint, after which the necessary auxiliary joints and adapter components can be arranged according to the invention.
| TABLE 1 |
|
| List of reference numbers. |
| Number | Part | |
|
| 10 | first bone group |
| 12 | firstauxiliary frame |
| 20 | second bone group |
| 21 | attachment means |
| 22 | secondauxiliary frame |
| 30 | auxiliary joint |
| 31 | first adapter component |
| 32 | second adapter component |
| 40 | joint |
| 50 | seating |
| 51 | recess |
| 60 | CAD model of joint'skinetic dynamics |
| 61 | axis ofrotation |
| 62 | centre point ofrotation |
| 63 | plane ofmotion |
| 64 | path (measured points) |
|