CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONSThis application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/952,811 entitled, “System and Method for Promoting and Tracking Physical Activity Among a Participating Group of Individuals” Jul. 29, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. Pat. No. 8,517,897 entitled, “System and Method for Promoting and Tracking Physical Activity Among a Participating Group of Individuals” issued Aug. 27, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/276,299 entitled, “System and Method for Promoting and Tracking Physical Activity Among a Participating Group of Individuals,” filed Oct. 18, 2011, which is a continuation of U.S. Pat. No. 8,070,655 entitled, “System and Method for Promoting and Tracking Physical Activity Among a Participating Group of Individuals,” issued Dec. 6, 2011, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth herein in their entireties.
BACKGROUND1. Field
In general, the present invention relates to systems and methods that are used to track the health and wellbeing of people within a targeted group. More particularly, the present invention relates to systems and methods that utilize interactive software to both promote and track physical activity among participants in the targeted group.
2. Description of the Background
It is a well-established fact that people generally live longer, healthier lives if they exercise regularly. It is also a well-established fact that people are more likely to start and continue an exercise program if they have peers and friends that are also participating in that exercise program. Recognizing the above stated facts, many companies have developed employee exercise programs. The hope is that these programs would lead to healthier employees and healthier employees, who would use less sick days and have lower healthcare costs. By offering such exercise programs at work, it is hoped that employees would exercise with peers and would benefit from the support of peers.
Difficulties develop, however, when the management of a company tries to develop exercise programs for their employees. The problem is that not all people enjoy the same types of exercise. As such, a company gym may only appeal to some employees, while a company softball team may appeal to others. Recognizing that different people like different things, exercise programs have been developed that are highly flexible to fit the varied needs and wants of a company's employees. In such exercise programs, the management of a company does not concern itself with what exercise is being performed. Rather, the company just monitors whether exercise is being performed and offers incentives to employees to continue exercising.
The most common way that companies monitor whether or not an employee is performing exercise is to provide the employees with interactive computer software. Using the software, an employee can enter what exercise has been performed. This information is then stored in a database for access by the company. Such exercise monitoring software systems are exemplified by U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2006/0287883 to Turgis, entitled Interactive Internet Supported Health And Fitness Management System; U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0072154 to Kaufman, entitled Lifesytle Coach Behavior Modification System; and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0100595 to Earles, entitled Behavior Monitoring And Reinforcement System and Method.
The problem associated with such prior art exercise monitoring software systems is that the systems require that an individual manually input data into a computer to inform the computer of what exercise has been performed. Since many of these systems provide rewards for exercise, there is a perverse incentive for people to lie or exaggerate about exercising in order to receive the reward. Furthermore, people may quickly grow tired of tasks in which they are not interested. Employees that must voluntarily enter and log their daily exercise routines may quickly develop user fatigue. Employees may forget to enter data daily and when they do enter data, that data may contain guesses and inaccurate remembrances of days past.
A need therefore exists for an exercise system that passively and accurately monitors the amount of exercise performed by an individual, thereby reducing cheating and user fatigue. A need also exists for an exercise system where all exercises are automatically reduced to comparable caloric expenditure units, thereby putting all exercises on a comparable basis for use in challenges and competitions. These needs are met by the herein described systems and methods.
SUMMARYThe present disclosure describes apparatus, systems, and methods for tracking physical activity of participants in an exercise program in order to help motivate them to add more exercise to their lives. Each participant is provided with a motion sensor that detects motion experienced by the participant. The motion sensor creates electronic data that corresponds to the motions detected. The motion detector is worn or carried by the participant somewhere on the body when the participant is exercising, and also when the participant is not exercising.
The motion sensor has the ability to passively transmit the data it collects. The data is analyzed. During the analysis of the data, it can be determined whether or not exercise has been performed. The analysis can also determine the type of exercise performed, when the exercise was performed, and the duration of the exercise performed.
The exercise of each participant can be converted into a caloric equivalent, and thence to a caloric expenditure unit for a preselected specific type of exercise. In this manner, the exercise equivalents of each participants' activities can be compared and applied to common exercise goals or exercise competitions. If an exercise goal is achieved by a participant, that participant is rewarded, such as with reward points in an amount proportionate to the difficulty of achieving that exercise goal. The reward points can be used as payment, for example, for goods and services that promote a healthy lifestyle.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGSFor a better understanding of the disclosure, reference is made to an exemplary embodiment thereof, for consideration in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 is a simplified view of an office containing an exemplary system in accordance with the disclosure;
FIG. 2 is a view of an exemplary embodiment of a monitoring unit;
FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing a methodology of operation for the herein described system;
FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing a methodology of reward in accordance with the disclosure; and
FIG. 5 is an exemplary graph plotting caloric expenditure against time for various detected exercises.
DETAILED DESCRIPTIONAlthough the herein described systems and methods can be used by many different user groups, such as schools, health clubs, or a community of registered online users, the embodiment illustrated shows the system being used by an employer to promote exercise among its employees. This embodiment is selected in order to set forth the best mode contemplated for the invention. The illustrated embodiment, however, is merely exemplary, and not limiting. The scope of the invention is determined by the appended claims.
Referring toFIG. 1, a portion of atraditional office10 is shown in which employees work. The employees havecomputers12 that are connected through a network14 to a remote systems computer16, such as a server computer. The network14 can be private, or may be connected to the Internet.
Each employee is provided with amonitoring unit20. Themonitoring unit20 is carried by or worn on the body of the employee. In an embodiment, themonitoring unit20 is connected to the shoe22 of the employee. However, themonitoring unit20 can also be connected to a sock, watchstrap, belt, lanyard, or other arrangement, such as on a limb or waist of the employee. As will later be explained in more detail, themonitoring unit20 records data corresponding to motion and forces experienced by themonitoring unit20 in a given time period. The data can be used to determine whether or not exercise has occurred. The data can also be used to determine the type of exercise performed, when that exercise was performed, and the duration of the exercising.
In theoffice10, at least onetransceiver24 is provided. Thetransceiver24 transmits anactivation signal26 that is received by anymonitoring unit20 within range. Once amonitoring unit20 receives anactivation signal26, it transmits its stored data to thetransceiver24 along with an identifier code for the employee. Thetransceiver24 receives both the identifier code and the transmitted data. That information is then forwarded to the remote system computer16 via the same computer network14.
The downloading of data from themonitoring unit20 to the system computer16 happens automatically each time an employee comes into theoffice10. As such, the data transfer is passive, needing no effort from the employee. The employee need only remember to connect themonitoring unit20 to a shoe or similar article of clothing being worn.
The system computer16 utilizes the data from each employee to track what exercise has been performed by the employee and when. Many types of exercise can be identified by the system computer16 through analysis of the type of data that is received. For instance, walking and running are easily identifiable. Other types of exercise can be identified as exercise, but the specific exercise may not be discernable. For instance, the data produced from playing tennis is nearly identical to the data produced from playing dodge ball. However, dodge ball may not burn the same amount of calories as does tennis.
When an employee logs onto his/heroffice computer12, the employee may be actively prompted with a message that indicates the exercise system has received new data. Otherwise, the system may be passive and wait for an employee to log onto the exercise system. Once interacting with the exercise system, the employee can recall data in many formats to show when exercise was performed, what exercise was performed, and for how long. As will later be explained, the data can also be applied to selected exercise challenges and competitions.
If the exercise system has received data that it cannot positively identify, then the employee is prompted to identify the exercise. The employee is reminded of when the exercise was performed and for how long. The employee then is provided with a list of exercises from which to choose. The employee selects the exercise that best described the activity performed. The system computer16 then has a complete set of data corresponding to the exercise activities of the employee.
To help motivate the employee, theexercise system10 presents challenges and competitions to the employee. The system computer16 then applies all exercise data to those challenges and competitions, in a manner later explained.
Referring toFIG. 2, a schematic of amonitoring unit20 is shown. Eachmonitoring unit20 contains at least oneaccelerometer28. Theaccelerometers28 are preferably micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS), however other technologies can be used. Theaccelerometers28 measure changes in acceleration in different orientation planes and convert that information into corresponding electronic signals. Within themonitoring unit20, aclock30 is provided. Theclock30 creates a time code signal that is coupled to each electronic signal produced by theaccelerometers28. The combined signals are stored in amemory32 as data signals.
Eachmonitoring unit20 has itsown identification code34 that identifies themonitoring unit20. Eachmonitoring unit20 also has areceiver36 for receiving the activation signal (26,FIG. 1) and atransmitter38 for transmitting both the data signals and theidentification code34.Suitable monitoring units20 that can be adapted for use by this invention are manufactured by Fitlinxx, Inc. of Norwalk, Conn.
Referring now toFIG. 3 in conjunction withFIG. 1, the operational methodology of the system is described. As is indicated byBlock40, each participating employee is assigned an account number for accessing the system computer16. Furthermore, each participating employees is provided with at least onemonitoring unit20.See Block42. An employee may be given more than onemonitoring unit20. In this manner, the employee can attach amonitoring unit20 to each of the sets of shoes he/she commonly wears. Within the system computer16, theidentification code34 for eachmonitoring unit20 given to an employee is assigned to the account for that employee.
Once an employee has set up an account, the employee is provided with a choice of exercise challenges from which to choose.See Block44. For instance, one challenge may be a virtual hike. An employee, using theirnetwork computer12, may select a geographical area, such as Pennsylvania, France, Kenya or the like. The systems computer16 will then generate a virtual hiking tour. The systems computer16 will then indicate how many steps are required to complete the virtual tour. For example, it may be 456,789 steps. The challenge, then, becomes for the employee to walk 456,789 steps. Each time the employee downloads data to the system computer16, the data is converted to steps, if necessary, and applied to the challenge. The systems computer16 may provide different images of different landmarks in the selected geographical area as data is applied to the challenge.
Other challenges may also be provided. For example, one employee may enter into direct competition with other employees to complete a stated amount of exercise in a stated amount of time.
Rewards may be provided to people who accomplish or win challenges. The nature of the rewards is later described in conjunction withFIG. 4.
As is indicated byBlock46, once an employee is entered into a challenge, the employee is left alone to live his/her life. It is hoped that the presence of the challenge and a potential reward or completing the challenge will entice the employee to exercise wherever and whenever they can. For instance, an employee may park farther away from work in order to walk a little more. The employee may take the stairs instead of the elevator. All of these little exercises are automatically recorded and are applied toward the employee's challenge.
The exercise data generated by an employee is stored until the employee transfers data to the system computer16. This can be done automatically by having the employee come within range of anoffice transceiver24. However, if desired, an employee can connect themonitoring unit20 directly to a computer at their home or office, using a standard USB connection cable. This is very useful for people who13 work some days at home or travel often as part of their job. Once the exercise data is downloaded, the data is analyzed by the system computer16.See Block48. First, the data is identified according to the types of exercise preformed the data. Different exercises produce different types of data. Since themonitoring unit20 contains accelerometers, the data gathered is analog in nature. Walking produces specific signals within the accelerometers at repeating intervals. A walking signal is straightforward to identify. Running creates greater accelerometer signals at faster intervals and is easy to identify. The signal profiles of numerous exercises are known. For instance, the signals generated by bicycle riding, swimming, and climbing stairs are readily identified. However, the signals generated by some other exercises can be identified as exercise, but cannot be precisely identified as to the type of exercise. For example, tennis and dodge ball create nearly identical signals from amonitor unit20 worn on the foot.
As is indicated byBlock50 and Block52, when a signal contains exercise data that cannot be specifically identified, the system computer16 prompts the employee the next time the user logs onto the system. In the prompt, the employee is provided with a choice of exercises from which to choose. The employee is reminded of when the exercise occurred and for how long the exercise lasted. The user then selects the exercise that best fits the exercise that was recorded.
In some circumstances, themonitoring unit20 may fail to recognize some exercise that has occurred. For instance, if an employee is wearing the monitoring unit on their foot and then goes canoeing, themonitoring unit20 many not record any exercise even though strenuous exercise is occurring. In such situations, an employee does have the option of manually entering a specific exercise for a specific period of time. However, the exercise selected cannot be contrary to the data signals received for that period. If the selected exercise does not match the data signal, it may be assumed that the employee is lying or exaggerating and the data signal may be ignored by the system computer16.
Once the system computer16 has all the exercise data for a specific period of time, the system computer16 converts the exercise data to that of the challenge exercise.See Block54. The challenge exercise is the exercise selected by the employee when initially selecting a challenge, as indicated back inBlock44. For instance, if the selected challenge is a virtual hike, as has been previously suggested, then all exercise data is converted into walking steps. However, if the selected challenge were a virtual marathon, then all exercise data is converted into running steps. Conversion is conducted by a determination of caloric expenditure equivalency. For example, if the selected challenge exercise is walking and walking is assigned a caloric expenditure of 250 calories per mile, then swimming for fifteen minutes is converted to one mile of walking This is because swimming for fifteen minutes also burns 250 calories, which is a caloric equivalent of one mile.
Once all the exercise data is converted into its challenge exercise equivalent, then the data is applied to the selected challenge.See Block56. Accordingly, an employee who rides a bicycle to work and plays basketball, may quickly complete a walking challenge without ever intentionally walking for exercise.
By converting all recorded exercise data into its challenge exercise equivalency, all employees can compete toward the same goal even though they exercise in different ways. Also, various employees can compete directly with each other, even though each employee exercises in a different way.
Referring toFIG. 4, the rewards portion of the method of operation can be outlined. As has been previously stated, an employee selects a challenge in which to particip ate. An employer may elect to provide rewards to the employee if the challenge is met. The rewards may be financial or work related, such as an extra vacation day. However, a unique rewards program is preferred.
As is indicated byBlock60 andBlock62, if an employee successfully completes an exercise challenge, then the employee is assigned a number of virtual reward points to his/her account. The number of reward points to be granted is directly dependent upon the difficulty of the exercise challenge that has been completed.
The administrator of the present invention system may enter into contracts with a variety of health promoting venues. The venues may include health clubs, sports clubs, sports equipment retails, vitamin retails, and the like. In these contracts, the venue companies agree to accept the virtual points awarded employees in exchange for some predetermined compensation. A list of participating companies is provided to each employee.See Block64. The employee can then spend his/her reward points by buying the goods or services from the various participating companies.See Block66.
By restricting the venues in which the reward points can be spent, each employee is provided a significant but limited choice. However, all the choices are beneficial to the health and well-being of the employee. It is therefore hoped that an employee's exercise will be self-perpetuating. That is, an employee earns reward points by exercising in a gym and the reward points help pay for membership in that gym. Otherwise, an employee earns reward points by playing a sport and the reward points pay for the equipment used to play that sport.
After an employee uses the present invention system for a period of time, a great deal of information is gathered concerning when and how a particular employee exercises. This information is formatted and provided to the employee for the benefit of the employee. Referring toFIG. 5, agraph70 is shown that shows activities plotted by time and calories burned during the course of one day. Thegraph70 shows only one of many ways the data can be formatted. However, when formatted as illustrated, an employee can see when they are exercising the most and when they are exercising the least. This may encourage employees to take the stairs or otherwise do some exercise during non-traditional hours.
It will be understood that the embodiment of the present invention that is illustrated and described is merely exemplary and that a person skilled in the art can make many variations to that embodiments. All such embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the present invention as defined by the claims.