RELATED APPLICATIONSThis application is a continuation application, and claims priority benefit with regard to all common subject matter, of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/862,173, filed Sep. 26, 2007, entitled “MULTI FACTOR AUTHENTICATION,” and which issued Jan. 29, 2013, as U.S. Pat. No. 8,365,258 (“the '258 Patent”). The '258 Patent is a non-provisional application, and claims priority benefit with regard to all common subject matter, of earlier-filed U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/866,068, filed Nov. 16, 2006, entitled “MULTI-FACTOR AUTHENTICATION SYSTEM,” and 60/939,091, filed May 21, 2007, entitled “MULTI-FACTOR AUTHENTICATION SYSTEM.” The identified earlier-filed patent and provisional patent applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety into the present application.
BACKGROUNDInternet access has become ubiquitous. In addition to traditional dial-up and Local Area Network-based network access, wireless access technologies including IEEE 802.11b and 802.11g (WiFi), WiMax, Bluetooth™, and others are being widely deployed. Many public locations, such as airports, bookstores, coffee shops, hotels, and restaurants have free or fee-based access to wireless Internet service. Some locations, such as hotel rooms, also offer internet access via Ethernet ports. In addition, businesses offer visiting professionals access to Internet service while they are on the premises.
Such Internet access services typically are not secured at the datalink layer. It is often possible for network administrators, other users, or even criminals to capture and view network transmissions made on these networks. The “last mile”, or the few hops on the network that are closest to the end user, are often only lightly secured, if at all, and are particularly vulnerable to traffic snooping. Enhanced communication security would find utility.
In addition, authentication remains a persistent technical problem in the information technology industry. With the proliferation of untrusted applications and untrusted networks, and the increasing use of the Internet for business functions, the authentication issues have become prominent. Authentication refers to a process by which a user makes his or her identity known to a system or application which the user is attempting to access, and occasionally, also the process by which the user verifies the identity of the system being accessed. A common authentication technique involves the use of a shared username and password combination. This style of authentication is vulnerable to a number of weaknesses. For example, passwords must be made long enough to be secure while being short enough to be memorable. Additionally, the loss of the password is sufficient to allow an attacker to gain access to the system by impersonating the user. Therefore, additional authentication techniques would find utility.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGSThe detailed description is provided with reference to the accompanying figures. In the figures, the left-most digit(s) of a reference number identifies the figure in which the reference number first appears. The use of the same reference numbers in different figures indicates similar or identical items.
FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a networked computing environment in accordance with an embodiment.
FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of a server in accordance with an embodiment.
FIGS. 3-8 are flow diagrams of embodiments of methods for secure network computing.
FIG. 9 is a schematic illustration of a networked computing environment in accordance with an embodiment.
FIG. 10 is a flow diagram of embodiments of a method for multifactor authentication.
FIG. 11 is a schematic illustration of and embodiment of a data file which may be used in a multifactor authentication.
DETAILED DESCRIPTIONDescribed herein are exemplary systems and methods for secure network computing and multifactor authentication. The methods described herein may be embodied as logic instructions on a computer-readable medium. When executed on a processor, the logic instructions cause a general purpose computing device to be programmed as a special-purpose machine that implements the described methods. The processor, when configured by the logic instructions to execute the methods recited herein, constitutes structure for performing the described methods.
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of various embodiments. However, various embodiments of the invention may be practiced without the specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, components, and circuits have not been described in detail so as not to obscure the particular embodiments of the invention.
FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a networked computing environment in accordance with an embodiment. In the exemplary architecture depicted inFIG. 1, one or moreclient computing devices110a,110b,110cestablish a communication connection with a point of presence (POP)server130, which in turn communicates with one ormore target servers140,142,144 via anetwork120.Target servers140,142,144, in turn, provide access to one or more computing resources such, as, e.g., internet services, electronic mail services, data transfer services, and the like.
Client computing devices110a,110b,110cmay be any computer-based communication device, including apersonal computer110a,a personal digital assistant (PDA)110b,or aterminal device110c.Client computing devices110a,110b,110cestablish a communication withPOP server130 via a communication network, which may be thesame network120 or a separate communication network. The particular form of communication network is not important. Communication network may comprise one or more direct communication links (e.g., a dial-up connection) between respectiveremote access devices110a,110b,110c.Alternatively, the communication network may comprise a private data network such as, e.g., an X.25 network, a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), or a public network such as, e.g., the Internet.
In one embodiment,POP server130 may be implemented by a general purpose computing device such as, e.g., a server, that executes logic instructions which cause the processor to execute various methods for performing secure network computing.FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of anexemplary computer system200 adapted to perform secure network computing. Thecomputer system200 includes acomputer208 and one or more accompanying input/output devices206 including adisplay202 having ascreen204, akeyboard210, other I/O device(s)212, and amouse214. The other device(s)212 can include a touch screen, a voice-activated input device, a track ball, and any other device that allows thesystem200 to receive input from a developer and/or a user. Thecomputer208 includessystem hardware220 and random access memory and/or read-only memory230. Afile store280 is communicatively connected tocomputer208.System hardware220 includes aprocessor222 and one or more input/output (I/O)ports224.File store280 may be internal such as, e.g., one or more hard drives, or external such as, e.g., one or more external hard drives, network attached storage, or a separate storage network.
Memory230 includes anoperating system240 for managing operations ofcomputer208. In one embodiment,operating system240 includes ahardware interface module254 that provides an interface tosystem hardware220. In addition,operating system240 includes one ormore file systems250 that managed files used in the operation ofcomputer208 and aprocess control subsystem252 that manages processes executing oncomputer208.Operating system240 further includes a systemcall interface module242 that provides an interface between theoperating system240 and one ormore application modules262 and/orlibraries264.
In operation, one ormore application modules260 executing oncomputer208 make calls to the systemcall interface module242 to execute one or more commands on the computer's processor. The systemcall interface module242 invokes the services of thefile systems250 to manage the files required by the command(s) and theprocess control subsystem252 to manage the process required by the command(s). Thefile system250 and theprocess control subsystem252, in turn, invoke the services of thehardware interface module254 to interface with thesystem hardware220.
The particular embodiment ofoperating system240 is not critical to the subject matter described herein.Operating system240 may be embodied as a UNIX operating system or any derivative thereof (e.g., Linux, Solaris, etc.) or as a Windows® brand operating system.
In one embodiment,memory230 includes one or morenetwork interface modules262,268, one or moresecure tunnel modules264, and one or morecommunication management modules266. Network interface modules may be implemented as web browsers such as, e.g., Internet Explorer, Netscape, Mozilla, or the like.Secure tunnel module264 comprises logic instructions which, when executed by a processor, configure the processor to generate a secure communication tunnel between thePOP server130 and a client computing device such as, e.g., one or more ofclient computing devices110a,110b,110c.Communication management module266 comprises logic instructions which, when executed by a process, configure the processor to manage communications between thePOP server130 and one or moreclient computing devices110a,110b,110cand between thePOP server130 and the one ormore servers140,142,144.
In embodiments,POP server130 receives a service request from a client computing device such as, e.g., one or more ofclient computing devices110a,110b,110c,identifying one or more resources available on a server such as140,142,144. For example, the service request may be embodied as a Uniform Resource Locator (URL) transmitted toPOP server130 from a browser executing on a client computing device. In response to the service request,POP server130 establishes a first communication link between thePOP server130 and the one or more resources available via a computing network identified in the service request. In one embodiment,POP server130 may launch an independent request for the resource request for the resource identified in the service request from the client computing device.POP server130 may further establish a first, secure communication link between thePOP server130 and theclient computing device110a,110b,110c,and connect a network interface module on the client computing device to the secure communication link.
POP server130 may further manage communication activity between the client computing device and the one or more resources available via a computing network at the POP server. In one embodiment, managing communication activity may include passing information received from aserver140,142,144 in response to a resource request from thePOP server130 to aclient computing device110a,110b,110cvia a secure communication link.
Operations implemented by thevarious modules262,264,266,268 and byclient computing devices110a,110b,110care explained with reference toFIGS. 3-8.FIGS. 3-8 are flow diagrams of embodiments of methods for secure network computing.FIG. 3 is a flow diagram illustrating high-level operations executed by a computing device such as one ofclient computing devices110a,110b,110cin a method for secure network computing. In one embodiment, at operation310 a secure communication link is initialized betweenPOP server130 and theclient computing device110a,110b,110c.Atoperation315 the client computing device sends outbound data via the secure communication link and atoperation320 the client computing device receives inbound data via the secure communication link. If, atoperation325 there are more outbound data requests, then control passes back tooperation315. Similarly, if atoperation330 there is more inbound data control passes back tooperation320 and the inbound data is received. If there are no further data requests or inbound data remaining, then control passes tooperation335 and the secure communication link may be terminated. Operations illustrated inFIG. 3 are explained in greater detail inFIGS. 4-8.
FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating operations in a method for initializing a secure communication link betweenPOP server130 and aclient computing device110a,110b,110c.In one embodiment,POP server130 implements an application tunneling technology, referred to herein as an AppTunnel, to construct a secure communication tunnel betweenPOP server130 and aclient computing device110a,110b,110c.
Referring toFIG. 4, atoperation410POP server130 receives an address of one or more resources such as, e.g., a website or other resource available onnetwork120. In one embodiment, the address received may represent a URL received in a service request from a web browser executing onclient computing device110a,110b,110c.In one embodiment,POP server130 transmits an ActiveX control comprising launch data toclient computing device110a,110b,110c.In alternate embodiments, the ActiveX control client may be replaced with a plug-in module compatible with other protocols such as, for example, the JAVA architecture or a CORBA architecture.
Atoperation420 theclient computing device110a,110b,110creceives the ActiveX launch data fromserver130. If, atoperation425 the client computing device is not compatible with ActiveX technology, then control passes tooperation465 and a rewriter host module may be activated. This procedure is explained in greater detail below. By contrast, if theclient computing device110a,110b,110cis capable of implementing an ActiveX control, then control passes to operation430 and theclient computing device110a,110b,110c,activates an ActiveX control host page. The Active X control host page instructs the browser how to load the ActiveX control, where to retrieve it from (if it is not already locally cached), and with what parameters the control should be started. A similar host page may be used to embedding plug-ins into other browsers such as Mozilla, Netscape, etc. This information may be contained in an HTML <OBJECT> tag.
Atoperation435 theclient computing device110a,110b,110cinitiates the ActiveX control received from theserver130. The ActiveX control causes theclient computing device110a,110b,110cto launch a new incidence of a browser or other network interface software (operation440). If additional ActiveX controls are necessary to enable theclient computing device110a,110b,110c,then one or more additional ActiveX controls maybe transmitted between theserver130 and theclient computing device110a,110b,110c.
Atoperation450 the client attaches a secure channel module to the browser. In one embodiment, the secure channel module may be embodied as an AppTunnel client module. The AppTunnel secure channel module is described in detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/737,200, incorporated by reference here above. Portions of that description are excerpted in the following paragraphs.
Application tunneling is a method for transporting data from a user's computer to a third party computer (a “proxy”). In one implementation, Application data may be intercepted as soon as it is sent (i.e., above layer 4 of the OSI model), before it is encapsulated by Internet protocols such as TCP, UDP, or IP. Data may then be transported across the network to the proxy. In other implementations, this application-level data is acquired differently (perhaps, for example, through the use of a virtual adapter). In all cases, it is application-level data (OSI layers 5-7, depending on the application and the protocol) that is tunneled via AppTunnels.
AppTunnels is application tunneling technology that tunnels data from an application on a first computer to a second computer, perhaps over a secure tunnel, for further processing and proxying at that other computer. AppTunnels technology may be implemented in a Static form or in a Dynamic form. Static AppTunnels technology requires manual (or pre-configured) establishment of the application tunnels and listeners. By contrast, dynamic AppTunnels implements on-the-fly tunnel creation using hook mechanisms.
Encryption and/or other security technologies may be applied to the tunnel to add security to the data being transported, although this is not strictly necessary.
AppTunnels differs from existing tunneling technologies such as Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE) in that it is designed to operate at the end user's computer, in such a way that the end user's applications do not have to be informed about the existence of the tunneling technology. By contrast, tunneling technologies such as GRE, on the other hand, are designed to be implemented in network elements such as routers.
AppTunnels differs from host-based encryption technologies such as SSL in several ways. First, SSL technology must be directly supported by the application in order to be applied. AppTunnels, however, does not require application awareness in order to be applied. Furthermore, SSL is closely tied to a particular security and encryption architecture. AppTunnels may be used with or without security technologies, and imposes no requirements on the underlying security technologies. AppTunnels has been used in conjunction with the WTP security protocol and with SSL.
To intercept the network traffic of an application a local listener is created and a tunnel is established between the first computer and the second computer. In one embodiment, a local listener may be implemented as listening TCP, UDP, or other socket(s) bound to a local host address (e.g., 127.0.0.1) on a computer. The port number, where applicable, may be determined by the tunneled application, and may be arbitrary in some protocols. Local listeners may be created either in response to instructions from dynamic AppTunnels hooks or by static configuration received in advance. It is also possible for a user to manually initiate the creation of a listener (and its associated tunnel). A data tunnel may be created between the AppTunnels client software and a compatible tunnel module on a server. In one embodiment, the tunnel may be implemented in accord with the WTP protocol described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/737,200.
Once an AppTunnel has been initialized, the end user application can be directed to connect to the AppTunnel. The process for this varies per application. In the case of Dynamic AppTunnels, no other action is necessary; data simply starts flowing from the application to the AppTunnels software, which in turn tunnels the data across the connection to the WTP concentrator.
In the case of Static AppTunnels, one additional step is required. The application is tricked into connecting to the local listener instead of to the target server, as would otherwise naturally be the case. To trick the client, the DNS system is configured to return the localhost address (127.0.0.1, usually) to requests for the destination server's IP address. This is usually done by changing the locally-present “hosts” file that the computer's DNS system consults before returning an IP address. This hosts file is modified, with an entry being inserted for the name of the target server with the IP address of localhost. In one embodiment, the AppTunnels client may be implemented as an executable component that is incorporated into and run by the user's web browser such as, e.g., an ActiveX control. For other browsers or other platforms, a Netscape Plugin may be used.
In one embodiment, AppTunnels implements a method of intercepting traffic in order to tunnel it is as follows: First, the computer's DNS resolution system is modified to re-route traffic for target network servers to the local computer. Next, the AppTunnels Client establishes itself as a server on the port that the application would expect to connect to. Once established, applications transparently connect to the Client on the local computer rather than to their natural target-network servers. No configuration or modification of the tunneled application is necessary.
The AppTunnels method can be used to tunnel any user-mode data over a tunnel to theserver130. This includes TCP and UDP on all platforms. Other protocols may be available for tunneling, depending on the platform. The AppTunnels architecture supports complex network protocols such as FTP, RPC, H.323, and other proprietary multi-connection protocols. It provides this support by inspection of protocol data at the server. A protocol may be termed ‘complex’ if it requires more than a simple client-to-server TCP connection.
In AppTunnels mode, theclient computing device110a,110b,110creceives a module called the AppTunnels Client, which attaches to the web browser. The AppTunnels client enables the web browser to access target network web pages by proxying requests through the AppTunnels client. The AppTunnels client forwards the requests to theserver130, which retrieves the requested document and returns it to the AppTunnels client, which in turn returns it to the web browser.
In brief, theclient computing device110a,110b,110cfirst reads the proxy settings configuration from the user's web browser. Theclient computing device110a,110b,110cstores the proxy settings and configures the browser to use a proxy auto-configuration file. This file instructs the browser to request its new proxy settings from the AppTunnels client. The request is made and replied to, and the new settings cause all further requests for documents to be proxied through the AppTunnels client.
The AppTunnels client then establishes a connection toserver130 and authenticates itself. After authentication, the AppTunnels client establishes itself as a server application and listens for incoming requests from the browser. As requests are received, they are forwarded toserver130. Responses are read in from the server and are sent back to the waiting browser.
The browser is monitored by Dynamic AppTunnels for any network communication attempts. In one embodiment, these attempts may be monitored using function call hooks of the Microsoft Winsock library, but other hooks are possible, as are other monitoring architectures (such as, for example, Winsock Layered Service Providers). When new network traffic is detected, it is intercepted by the Dynamic AppTunnels code for further processing.
In one embodiment, child processes created by the browser may be injected with the Dynamic AppTunnels monitoring code. Thus, network traffic generated by child processes send will be encapsulated in the AppTunnel. Child process monitoring may be implemented using an API hook for all of the CreateProcess( ) family of functions. When a call to CreateProcess( ) is made, the Dynamic AppTunnels code receives it first, and ensures that the monitoring code is injected in the resulting new process.
In one embodiment, dynamic AppTunnels technology is implemented using API hooks. When dynamic AppTunnels receives a request to start a tunneled process, it creates a new process using the CreateProcess( ) API call. A new process may be created as suspended, so that the process does not run after it is initially created. At this point, one or more imported functions are substituted, or hooked, such that they point to wrapper functions that are part of the Dynamic AppTunnels software. The hooked functions are of two classes: network functions and process management functions.
In particular, the CreateProcess( ) function (and its relatives) may be hooked so that any child processes that are created can have the Dynamic AppTunnels monitoring code injected as well. This code is responsible for signaling the browser plugin that it should inject the rest of the hooks into the newly created process. Any child processes of that child are treated in the same way.
The networking functions that are hooked are related to connection requests and to name resolution requests. In general, all functions that are called during initial connection setup are intercepted. Once hooked, these functions receive any connection requests, and use this information for two purposes. The first is to coordinate with the tunneling protocol on the AppTunnel server to create an additional AppTunnel between the client and the AppTunnel server, and to create a local listener that is attached to that tunnel. The second is to re-direct the requesting application to the local listening socket, so that connections are made it instead of to the original target server. This process allows network traffic generated by the client to be captured by the browser plug-in and tunneled.
Alternatively, the plug-in may choose to examine the connection request information and make a decision at runtime as to whether the traffic should be tunneled or allowed to go straight out to the network as it otherwise would have. These decisions can be based on names (such as DNS or WINS names), network addresses, port numbers, or other identifying information. While this description has largely been written in the context of TCP sockets, it should be pointed out that other kinds of network traffic may be supported, including UDP and raw IP packets.
Referring back toFIG. 4, atoperation455 the browser instantiated at theclient computing device110a,110b,110cloads the requested resource, which may be displayed on a suitable user interface such as, e.g., a computer screen or the like. At operation460, subsequent data transfer operations between theclient computing device110a,110b,110cand theserver130 are conveyed through the secure tunnel. When the user of the client computing device is finished with the browsing session, the browser may be closed. Closing the browser also closes any dynamic AppTunnels constructed between theclient computing device110a,110b,110cand theserver130.
FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating operations in a method for implementing an AppTunnel on aclient computing device110a,110b,110c.In one embodiment, the ActiveX control transmitted from theserver130 to the client computing device operations ofFIG. 5 may cause the client computing device to perform the operations illustrated inFIG. 5.
Referring toFIG. 5, atoperation510 one or more static listeners and AppTunnels are initialized on the client computing device. Atoperation515 the AppTunnels plugin (i.e., the ActiveX control) receives a request to start an application. For example, the plugin may receive a request to start an instance of a browser.
Atoperation520 it is determined whether the device supports dynamic AppTunnels. As described above, AppTunnels can operate in either a static mode or in a dynamic mode. The difference is in the way the data is acquired for tunneling. Static AppTunnels uses a static local listening TCP/IP socket for each pre-configured service. If a user wants to use a web browser over a static AppTunnel, for example, there must be a configured application tunnel listening on TCP port 80 on the local host. Furthermore, the destination address for the AppTunnel must be specified. To cause the user's application to connect to the AppTunnels socket instead of trying to use Internet routes in the usual way, the DNS system of the client computing device is configured (usually using the computer's hosts file) to change the IP address of the server in question to point to the local host (usually 127.0.0.1), thereby fooling the application into making a local connection to the listening socket.
Thus, referring toFIG. 5, if atoperation520 dynamic AppTunnels is not enabled, then control passes to operation525 and the DNS system is configured, and at operation530 a local listening socket is created. At operation535 a new process is created.
By contrast, if atoperation520 the device accommodates dynamic AppTunnels, then control passes tooperation540 and a new process is created on the client computing device. In one embodiment creating a new process may involve a user clicking an HTML link on the web page in a browser executing on the client computing device. The ActiveX control then launches the new process and injects the Dynamic AppTunnels application monitoring code into the newly started process (operation545). At operation550 a new AppTunnel is created between the client computing device and theserver130.
Following eitheroperation535 or550, control passes tooperation560 and the application receives data in the listening socket generated by the AppTunnel. Atoperation565 the data received in the AppTunnel is removed and passed to the process (i.e., the web browser) for further processing and presentation to a user via a suitable interface such as, e.g., a display. Operations560-565 may be repeated until, atoperation570, there is no more data to tunnel, whereupon operations terminate.
FIG. 6 is a flow diagram illustrating operations in a method for processing outbound traffic from a network interface module such as, for example, a web browser executing on aclient computing device110a,110b,110c.The operations ofFIG. 6 depict traffic processing for a browser that has an AppTunnel module attached to the browser. Referring toFIG. 6, atoperation610 the web browser receives an address of a resource available onnetwork120. In one embodiment, the address may represent a Uniform Resource Locator (URL) of a resource available onnetwork120. Atoperation615 the browser initiates a service request for the resource. Atoperation620 the service request is intercepted by the AppTunnel module. Atoperation625 the AppTunnel client secures the request data and atoperation630 the AppTunnel client forwards the request to thePOP server130. Atoperation640 the secured request is received at thePOP server130. Atoperation645 the secure tunnel module264 (i.e., the AppTunnel server) extracts the request data from the secure tunnel.
Atoperation650 the POP server forwards the service request to the address identified in the service request. In one embodiment, the service request is received in a firstnetwork interface module262 instantiated onPOP server130, andPOP server130 instantiates a secondnetwork interface module268 and launches a service request from the second network interface module.
FIG. 7 is a flow diagram illustrating operations in a method for processing inbound traffic such as, for example, one or more resources returned from a service request. Referring briefly toFIG. 7, atoperation710 the data returned by the resource request is received at thePOP server130. In one embodiment, the data is received in the secondnetwork interface module268 instantiated on thePOP server130. Atoperation715 the response data is secured. In one embodiment, response data is operated on by thesecure tunnel module264. Atoperation720 the response data is placed in the secure tunnel to theclient computing device110a,110b,110cvia the firstnetwork interface module262.
At operation725 the client receives the response data transmitted to the client by the server. Atoperation730 the data is removed from the secure tunnel established by AppTunnels. In one embodiment, the AppTunnels client attached to the browser in theclient computing device110a,110b,110cremoves the received data from the tunnel and, atoperation735, forwards the data to the web browser. The web browser may present the data on a user interface such as, e.g., a display, for viewing by the user.
Referring back toFIG. 4, if atoperation425 the client computing device is not capable of executing a plugin such as, e.g., an ActiveX control, then control passes tooperation465 and a URL rewriter technique is activated. URL rewriting is a method of providing a reverse proxy server for use in secure remote access systems and other applications without the need for any locally installed code. Most web browsers can exchange traffic with web servers using a protocol known as secure HTTP, or HTTPS. However, most websites do not support HTTPS. To add security to every website the user requests, special HTTPS requests are made to a URL rewriter server instead of the target web server, using HTTPS to the rewriter. The rewriter then forwards the request to the target web server by proxy, using the expected destination protocol of the web server (typically HTTP). On return, the web data is returned over HTTPS to the client's browser. It should be noted that any other form of browser-based security, or no security whatsoever, could be used in the communications link to the rewriter.
It should be noted that references to other web data will now cause the user's browser to make direct requests to the target server, rather than ask the rewriter server. Thus, references to other web content (hyperlinks, images, java applets, and so on) may be rewritten in the webpage so that they refer to the rewriter instead of to the target server to ensure that all web traffic is routed through the rewriter, and not via direct connections. Accordingly, any web references in the returned document are rewritten with references to the URL rewriter server.
FIG. 8 is a flow diagram illustrating operations in a method for processing inbound traffic such as, for example, one or more resources returned from a service request. Referring briefly toFIG. 8 at operation810 a rewriter host page on theclient computing device110a,110b,110claunches a second web browser using instructions embedded in the HTML and JavaScript code that is a part of the page. Atoperation815 the rewritten URL is written into the second browser. Atoperation820 the second browser requests the specified resource using the rewritten URLs.
Atoperation825 theserver130 receives the service request from theclient computing device110a,110b,110c.Atoperation830 theserver130 un-rewrites the URL, and atoperation835 the server retrieves the requested resource from theserver140,142,144 hosting the resource on thenetwork120. Atoperation840 the server rewrites the embedded URLs in the retrieved resource, and atoperation845 the server returns the rewritten resource to the client.
Atoperation850 theclient computing device110a,110b,110creceives and processes the requested resource. In one embodiment, processing the requested resource may include presenting the resource on a suitable display. If atoperation855 there are more requests to be processed, then control passes back tooperation820, and the browser requests the specified resource(s). By contrast, if atoperation855 there are no further resource requests, then the process terminates.
Thus, the operations described inFIGS. 3-8 enable a client device such as one or more ofclient computing devices110a,110b,110cto establish a secure “last mile” communication link, thereby enabling secure communication with resources hosted by one ormore servers140,142,144 in anetwork120. The systems and methods described herein are agnostic regarding the type of encryption applied (if any) to communication links betweenPOP server130 andservers140,142,144.
The systems described above are browser-based systems. In alternate embodiments, aclient computing device110a,110b,110cmay download and install a permanent piece of client encryption module onto the end user's computer. The permanent client provides encryption services between theclient computing device110a,110b,110cand theservers140,142,144. With a permanent client encryption module, the end user does not have to navigate to the service provider's website in order to turn on secure surfing. Further, a client-based approach can support all Internet-based applications.
In another embodiment, an ActiveX control installs and initializes a virtual VPN Miniport, as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/737,200. The ActiveX control captures and processes any relevant traffic on the computer. In this way, end user traffic is directed into the secured tunnel described above.
A virtual VPN Miniport can support non-TCP protocols, while maintaining the convenience of a web-based environment. It can also secure applications that have already been started. For example, if the end user were running an instant messaging client, that client's communications would be secured from the time of connection forward, without a need to re-launch the client. Installation of a VPN driver can be silent and automatic, and only needs to occur one time. From that point on, the ActiveX control activates the VPN driver and manages network routes to cause traffic to be directed into the VPN driver for encryption.
Access to thePOP server130 may be provided by a number of methodologies. In one embodiment access toPOP server130 may be provided on a pay-for-service business model. In this embodiment,POP server130 may include a transaction processing module to process payment transactions, e.g., by a credit card or other payment mechanism. Charges may be levied on the basis of bandwidth consumed, or by a time parameter (i.e., minutes, hours, days, years, etc.).
In alternate embodiments access toserver130 may be implemented on the basis of advertising revenue. For example, pay-per-click advertising can be implemented, using randomly-selected advertisements, pay-per-click advertising can be implemented, using information gained by inspecting the user's traffic during secure surfing to select targeted advertisements, or traditional Internet banner advertisements can be inserted, either randomly or based on inspection of the secured data. Advertisements can be inserted in the initial service provider web page, in the refreshed web page that hosts the ActiveX control, or even inline with the displayed web pages.
Multiple levels of service may be defined. For example, low-quality service might be provided free of charge, while high-quality service might be provided for a fee. Service levels may be differentiated by one or more facts such as, for example throughput (i.e., a performance aspect might be controlled), bandwidth (i.e., the total number of bytes transferred might be capped), data transfer (i.e., a transfer cap might be imposed per day, per month, or per year), or some combination thereof. Other options include allowing only a limited amount of time to use the system or bandwidth in a tier or a certain amount of throughput for a certain amount of time, with decreased throughput after the elapse of that time, or restricting access to certain resources based on the service level.
Last-mile encryption service may be provided to a user with no pre-existing account. The web-based interface can be used simply by entering the address of a website that is to be securely accessed. In the installed client case, the user logs in anonymously using the supplied anonymous login method. Anonymous users may be granted a different tier of service, as described above.
In an anonymous user case, cookie-based, form-based, or IP address-based information may be used to correlate the anonymous user's browsing activities, for purposes including providing advanced service features (such as browsing history, enhanced status reporting, etc), selecting relevant advertising, or for other purposes.
Users that desire temporary top-tier service may be given the option of paying electronically for a one-time use of the service without creating an account.
Users that wish to use the service repeatedly may wish to create a user account. The user account could then be used to track browsing history, make more intelligent decisions about advertising content to be presented, or offer other value-added services. Users of the service would then be prompted to log in to the website (or to the downloaded client software) using the established authentication credentials. Optionally, a cookie-based login persistence mechanism can be supported, allowing the user to go for a period of time without the need to log in.
Multi-Factor AuthenticationAs described above, authentication remains a technical challenge in the information technology sector. Described herein are multifactor authentication techniques which may be used alone, or in combination with other security techniques described herein to provide secure access to resources in a computer network. Embodiments of multifactor authentication techniques will be described in the context of a computer network similar to the network described in with reference toFIG. 1. It will be understood, however, that authentication techniques as described herein may be implemented in a wide variety of computer networks.
FIG. 9 is a schematic illustration of a networked computing environment in accordance with an embodiment. In the exemplary architecture depicted inFIG. 9, one or moreclient computing devices910a,910b,910c,910d,910eestablish a communication connection with anauthentication server930, which in turn communicates with one ormore target servers940,942,944 via anetwork920.Target servers940,942,944, in turn, provide access to one or more computing resources such, as, e.g., internet services, electronic mail services, data transfer services, and the like.
Client computing devices910a,910b,910c,910d,910emay be any computer-based communication device, including apersonal computer910a,a personal digital assistant (PDA)910b,aterminal device910c,amobile telephone910d,or a land-line telephone910e.Client computing devices910a,910b,910c,910d,910eestablish a communication withauthentication server930 via a communication network, which may be thesame network920 or a separate communication network. The particular form of communication network is not important. Communication network may comprise one or more direct communication links (e.g., a dial-up connection) between respectiveremote access devices910a,910b,910c,910d,910e.Alternatively, the communication network may comprise a private data network such as, e.g., an X.25 network, a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), or a public network such as, e.g., the Internet.
Authentication server930 may be embodied as a computing device, substantially as described in with reference toFIG. 2, above. Referring briefly toFIG. 2, thecomputing device200 and comprise one ormore authentication modules269 which may execute when as an application module and thememory230 of thecomputing system200. In some embodiments, theauthentication module269 and implemented logic instructions which, when executed by a processor such as theprocessor222, cause theauthentication module269 to implement multifactor authentication procedures to manage access to one or more resources of thecomputer network920, such as for example, resources provided byservers940,942, or944.
In some embodiments, theauthentication server930 implements a first authentication process in response to an authentication request from a client computing device such as one ofclient computing devices910a,910b,910c,910d,910e.If the first authentication process is successful, then theauthentication server930 originates a second authentication request to a client device such as one ofclient computing devices910a,910b,910c,910d,910e.In some embodiments, the authentication request from the client is transmitted through a first communication channel and the second authentication request originated by theauthentication server930 is transmitted using a second communication channel, different from the first communication channel. Theauthentication server930 may process the response to the second authentication request and allow or deny access to a resource based on the response. In some embodiments the first communication channel and the second communication channel may be across separate communication networks. For example, the first communication channel may be across the computer network, while the second communication channel may be across a telephone network.
One embodiment of multifactor authentication will be explained with reference toFIG. 10, which is a flow diagram of embodiments of a method for multifactor authentication. Referring toFIG. 10, at operation1010afirst client initiates a primary authentication request for access to a resource provided bycomputer network920. In some embodiments, the primary authentication request may include a username and password combination associated with a user and/or a device from which the primary authentication request is originated. The primary authentication request may be transmitted to theauthentication server930 to a first communication channel.
Operation1015 theauthentication server930 receives the primary authentication request, and atoperation1020 theauthentication server930 processes the primary authentication request. In some embodiments, theauthentication server930 performs a centralized authentication function which manages authentication to one or more resources andnetwork920. For example,authentication server930 may maintain a data file comprising username and password combinations which may be associated with one or more resources of thecomputer network920.FIG. 11 is a schematic illustration of and embodiment of a data file which may be used in a multifactor authentication. Referring briefly toFIG. 11, the illustrateddata file1100 includes a column for usernames, a column for passwords, and a column for approved resources. Usernames and passwords may be logically associated with the approved resource indicated in the table1100. A single username may be associated with multiple passwords for different approved resources. In one embodiment, processing the primary authentication request may comprise searching the data file1100 maintained by the authentication server for a username and password combination that corresponds to the username and password combination receipt in the primary authentication request.
If, anoperation1025, the primary authentication request is unsuccessful, i.e., if there is no corresponding username and password combination in the data table1100, then theauthentication server930 denies the requester access to network resource(s). In some embodiments, theauthentication server930 may transmit an error message to the requester indicating that the username and password are invalid. Control that returns tooperation1015 and theauthentication server930 continues to monitor for another primary authentication request.
By contrast, if thatoperation1025 primary authentication request is successful, i.e., if there is a corresponding username and password combination in the data table1100, then control passes tooperation1035 and theauthentication server930 initiates a secondary authentication request. The secondary authentication request is transmitted from theauthentication server930 to the user via a second communication channel, different from the first communication channel. In some embodiments, the secondary authentication request is transmitted from theauthentication server930 to a second client in the user's possession. For example, the user may initiate the primary authentication request from a computing device such as a desktop computer or laptop computer and theauthentication server930 may transmit the secondary authentication request by initiating a telephone call to a telephone registered to the user. Referring briefly again toFIG. 11, a user may register, via a suitable user interface, a contact number to which the secondary authentication request may be transmitted from theauthentication server930. In response to a successful primary authentication request, theauthentication server930 may initiate a call to contact number indicated in the data table1100. It should be noted that a user may provide different contact numbers for different resources.
Atoperation1040 the secondary authentication request is received at the second client. The secondary authentication request may comprise a voice message which makes a request for information to authenticate the user. In some embodiments, the system may allow a user to prerecord a customized secondary authentication request in the user's own voice. For example, the user may record a message requesting a specific sequence of keystrokes or requesting the user to speak to a specific word or group of words. Having a user recorded message in the second authentication request helps to authenticate the system to the user, thereby eliminating or at least reducing the likelihood of a “man in the middle” attack on the system. In alternate embodiments, rather than using a prerecorded message in the user's voice, a user may select one or more tokens to be presented with a secondary authentication requests. For example, a token may include a predetermined word or character or numeric sequence selected by the user.
Atoperation1045 the user response to the secondary authentication request initiated by theauthentication server930. For example, in some embodiments the user may respond by pressing a predetermined sequence of keystrokes on a telephone keypad, or by pressing the pound key or the star key. In alternate embodiments the user may respond by speaking a predetermined word or series of words. In alternate embodiments the user need not provide an affirmative response; simply answering the telephone call may suffice as a response.
In some embodiments, the secondary authentication request initiated by theauthentication server930 may be implemented as a text message rather than a telephone call. Accordingly, the response to the secondary authentication request may also be implemented as a text message in which the user transmits a predetermined character or series of characters back to theauthentication server930.
In alternate embodiments, the secondary authentication request may require a user to initiate a call back in order to authenticate the user. For example, the secondary authentication request may transmit a text message or a voice call requesting the user to call back to the system to authenticate the user. In some embodiments, a return phone number may be included with the secondary authentication request, while in other embodiments a user may be required to call a predetermined phone number. As described above, the user may be required to provide one or more codes in the secondary authentication response.
Atoperation1050 theauthentication server930 receives the response to the secondary authentication request, and atoperation1055 theauthentication server930 processes the response. In some embodiments,authentication server930 maintains authentication codes which represent the anticipated response to the secondary authentication request in the data table1100. The response to the secondary authentication request received from the user may be compared with the authentication code stored in the data table1100 in order to determine whether the user is authentic.
If, atoperation1060, the response to the secondary authentication request fails to successfully authenticate the user then access to network resources is denied atoperation1065 and control passes back tooperation1015 in the authentication server monitors for additional incoming primary authentication requests. In some embodiments, theauthentication server930 may implement an error routine in response to a failed a secondary authentication request. The authentication routine may transmit an error message to the user via the first communication channel, the second communication channel, or both. The error message may instruct the user that authentication has failed and they provide the user with an opportunity to restart the authentication process.
By contrast, is thatoperation1060 the response to the secondary authentication request successfully authenticates the user then control passes tooperation1070 and the user is granted access to the network resource or resources associated with the username and password in the data table1100. Control then passes back tooperation1015 and theauthentication server930 continues to monitor for additional primary authentication request.
Thus, the operations depicted inFIG. 10 enable the network infrastructure depicted inFIG. 11 to implement a multifactor authentication process. In some embodiments described herein, the multifactor authentication process utilizes two separate network devices, i.e., a computing device and a telephone. In some embodiments, the multifactor authentication process may utilize a single network device, i.e., a computing device, which executes two or more logical network devices. For example, a user may initiate a primary authentication request from a first application executing on the computing device, and the second authentication request may be directed to a second application executing on the computing device. For example, the second application may be an Internet Protocol (IP) telephony application.
Various features may be added to the functionality of the basic authentication process described herein. In some embodiments, theauthentication server930 may store in a memory module such as cache memory the results of a primary authentication request initiated by a user, alone or in combination with the results of a secondary authentication response provided by the user. The results may be stored in for a predetermined period of time or for a dynamic period of time. Thus, when a user has successfully authenticated himself or herself to the system additional authentication may not be required during the time period. Theauthentication server930 may require that subsequent primary authentication requests be initiated from the same network address in order to bypass the secondary authentication request. Thus, in some embodiments theauthentication server930 may detect the network address from which the primary authentication request is initiated and may store the network address in a memory module.
Further, there may be circumstances in which secondary authentication requests may not be necessary. For example, if a user is located on a trusted network in the secondary authentication request may be bypassed. Thus, in some embodiments of theauthentication server930 may detect the network address from which the primary authentication request is initiated and may compare the network address with a list of approved network addresses stored in a memory module.
Still further, there may be circumstances in which theauthentication server930 declines to initiate a secondary authentication requests. In some embodiments, in the event of a predetermined number of failures for a primary authentication request theauthentication server930 may flag a user as a suspect for fraudulent access and may decline to initiate a secondary authentication request unless further conditions are met. In some embodiments, in the event multiple primary authentication requests are received from different network addresses within a predetermined period of time the authentication server may flag a user as a suspect for fraudulent access and may decline to initiate a secondary authentication request unless further conditions are met. For example, a user may be required to reset passwords or to speak personally with an administrator.
In some embodiments, theauthentication server930 may provide a user interface that enables users to register one or more telephone numbers or contact addresses for the network device intended for use for the secondary authentication request. The user interface may further permit users to select one or more authentication codes or personal identification numbers (PINs) for both the primary authentication request and the secondary authentication response.
Various alternate embodiments may be implemented. For example, n some situations it may not be possible to submit a user's primary authentication credentials to the authentication server without incurring unwanted side-effects. For example, logging into a web application using primary authentication credentials may cause the application to take actions such as creating a user session, logging a message, or the like that may be undesirable.
In such situations, a the authentication server may implement a pre-authentication process. After receiving the primary authentication credentials, the authentication system can attempt to pre-authenticate them using a different API interface, rather than pre-authenticating to the target server itself. For example, in a web application such as Microsoft's Outlook Web Access, the system may pre-authenticate the user by calling the Windows LogonUser( ) API, which checks the user's username and password against the Windows password database. Alternatively, in a Citrix environment, the system could pre-authenticate the user using the Citrix authentication APIs.
If the pre-authentication step is successful, the secondary authentication may be implemented as described before. Only if that is also successful are the user's credentials submitted to the application in question for final log-in. This becomes a three-phase login, but it has the benefit of allowing compatibility with applications that would not otherwise support the two-phase approach.
In addition, the strength of the authentication process can be increased using voice-print technology during the confirmation call. During the secondary authentication call, the system asks the user to repeat a series of words. The user repeats the words, and the system makes a determination of whether the user is who he claims to be by evaluating the user's voice against a voice database, using voice matching algorithms.
Again, this makes the system three-factor: the primary authentication is something the user knows, the secondary is something the user has (phone), and the tertiary authentication is something the user is (his voice).
This system can also be used for multi-person authentication. For example, in situations which require the approval of more than one to allow an action to complete, multiple secondary authentication calls can be placed. For example, in the case of a bank transfer requiring two people to agree to the transaction, the system may place multiple confirmation calls, one to every person authorized to approve the transaction. It could then play back details of the proposed transaction to each user (which can happen simultaneously), and if a minimum number of those users confirm the transaction, the system returns success. This system can scale to an arbitrarily large number of required confirmations.
Reference in the specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with that embodiment may be included in at least an implementation. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification may or may not be all referring to the same embodiment.
Also, in the description and claims, the terms “coupled” and “connected,” along with their derivatives, may be used. In some embodiments, “connected” may be used to indicate that two or more elements are in direct physical or electrical contact with each other. “Coupled” may mean that two or more elements are in direct physical or electrical contact. However, “coupled” may also mean that two or more elements may not be in direct contact with each other, but may still cooperate or interact with each other.
Thus, although embodiments of the invention have been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that claimed subject matter may not be limited to the specific features or acts described. Rather, the specific features and acts are disclosed as sample forms of implementing the claimed subject matter.