US20120083767A1 - Implantable bioreactor for delivery of paracrine factors - Google Patents

Abstract

An implantable bioreactor containing a barrier which is designed to allow the release of cell-derived biomolecules, but restricts the entry of immunologic and other cells, or the egress of the cells contained within the bioreactor. Two broad classes of implantable bioreactors are envisioned, encompassing devices for both systemic delivery of the bio-products and local delivery at the target tissue. Bioreactors of both classes can be implanted via surgery, through percutaneous techniques, or other techniques which effect implantation.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
• This application claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/388,778, filed Oct. 1, 2010, the contents of which are incorporated by reference in its entirety.
BACKGROUND
• Heart muscle damage is the final common pathway for most forms of cardiovascular disease and when extensive can impair quality of life and shorten survival. The most common cause is obstruction in coronary arteries, but the heart as well as other organs can be damaged by trauma, toxins, and infections. There are no currently approved therapies to generate new myocardium, or heart muscle. Stem cells have been administered intravenously (Hare et al.J Am Coll Cardiol.Dec. 8, 2009; 54(24):2277-2286), via infusion into the coronary arteries (Abdel-Latif et al.Arch Intern Med.May 28, 2007; 167(10):989-997, Johnston et al.Circulation.Sep. 22, 2009; 120(12):1075-1083) and by injection into the heart muscle itself (Williams et al.Circ Res. Apr.1, 2011; 108(7):792-6). The results in terms of improved muscle function, however, have been very limited, possibly because of early “washout” (short duration of viable cells at the target site because of blood flow), the hostile environment into which the cells are delivered, and immunologic attack (Chavakis et al.Circulation;Jan. 19, 2010; 121(2):325-335, Terrovitis et al.Circ Res.Feb. 19, 2010; 106(3):479-494). Biomolecules released by the stem cells, called paracrine factors, may be responsible, in part, for their benefit (Gnecchi et al.Nat Med.April 2005; 11(4):367-368, Gencchi et al.Circ Res. Nov.21, 2008; 103(11):1204-1219, Chimenti et al.Circ Res.Mar. 19, 2010; 106(5):971-980).
SUMMARY
• An embodiment of the invention relates to an implantable bioreactor comprising a housing comprising cells which produce paracrine factors in situ; wherein the housing comprises a barrier that shields the enclosed cells from immunological attack and permits the transfer of paracrine factors out of the housing. The implantable bioreactor can be for systemic or local delivery of paracrine factors. The implantable bioreactor housing can be in the form of a pouch, semi-permeable membrane, a cellular microenclosure or a matrix gel. The bioreactor can be optionally adhered to a medical device.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
• FIG. 1: Miniature bioreactor for in vitro paracrine factor production and cell viability experiments.
• FIG. 2: Simplified catheter-based temporary stem cell bioreactor.
• FIG. 3: Catheter-based temporary stem cell bioreactor.
• FIG. 4: Microfabricated silicon cell enclosure.
• FIG. 5: Microfabricated cellular enclosure mounted to a vascular stent.
• FIG. 6: Microfabricated cellular enclosure bonded to coronary guide wire.
• FIG. 7: Hydrogel coated stent encapsulating stem cells within a crosslinked hydrophilic polymer.
• FIG. 8: Final solid fraction of the hydrogel plotted versus the initial solid fraction. Higher final solid fractions are associated with greater crosslink densities.
• FIG. 9: Final organic solid fraction plotted against the molecular weight of the polyethylene glycol precursor.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
• 1000131 Clinical trials using intra-coronary and intra-myocardial injection of stem cells in an attempt to heal and regenerate infarcted myocardium have produced modest results to date (Chavakis et al.Circulation;Jan. 19, 2010; 121(2):325-335, Terrovitis et al.Circ Res.Feb. 19, 2010; 106(3):479-494). Potential reasons for the modest results may be related to inadequate levels of paracrine factors from the cells, which may be due to poor retention of cells due to cell death, removal via immunologic mechanisms, and simple “washout” following delivery, leaving cells with only a brief opportunity to exert beneficial effects. Embodiments of the implantable bioreactor disclosed herein can solve the problems of diffusion or washout by providing adequate, prolonged delivery of paracrine factors secreted from the bioreactor while protecting the contents of the bioreactor from immunologic clearance in an enclosed housing. In an embodiment, the housing allows for the passage of nutrients, which are smaller than immune cells, into the reactor. The invention includes in one embodiment, a minimally invasive percutaneous bioreactor and, in another embodiment, an implantable device either of which can adequately produce and release paracrine factors. The bioreactor can also be used to promote healing and regeneration by release of paracrine factors in any other tissue or organ.
• As used herein, “bioreactor” refers to a collection of cells, in a housing, capable of producing and releasing paracrine factors. As used herein, “paracrine factors” are diffusible components produced by one cell to affect another cell. The diffusible components can be any protein, growth factor, biomolecule, nutrient or fluid produced by the cells housed in the bioreactor. As used herein, “cells” include any cell capable of producing and releasing paracrine factors. As used herein, “cells” can include pancreatic beta cells, endothelial cells, myocardial cells, and fibroblasts, as well as genetically altered cells. As used herein, “stem cells” include, but are not limited to, embryonic and adult stem cells. Embryonic stem cells include, without limitation, totipotent, pluripotent and multipotent stem cells, and adult stem cells include, without limitation, mesenchymal stem cells, adipose-derived stem cells, whole bone-marrow derived stem cells, myocardial derived stem cells and endothelial progenitor stem cells. Combinations of stem cells and these other cell types are also contemplated.
• Various embodiments of the invention include (a) an implantable bioreactor which enhances recovery of injured myocardium and other tissue utilizing a stem cell strategy; (b) a percutaneously implantable bioreactor, which also includes an easily retrievable percutaneous bioreactor allowing removal once an intended treatment period is complete; (c) a temporary implantable device that releases paracrine factors, which are generated de novo by stem cells and/or other cell types; (d) a permanent implantable device that releases paracrine factors, which are generated de novo by stem cells and/or other cell types; (e) a bioreactor implanted via a standard vascular sheath; (f) an implantable bioreactor which locally releases paracrine factors in the target tissue; (g) an implantable bioreactor which contains a barrier with pores which allow the release of cell-derived biomolecules, but not large enough to allow the entry of immunologic and other cells, or the egress of the stem cells and/or other cell types; (h) an implantable bioreactor which contains a barrier composed of the material described herein and which is designed to allow the release of cell-derived biomolecules, but not large enough to allow the entry of immunologic and other cells, or the egress of the stem cells and/or other cell types; and (i) an implantable bioreactor which systemically releases paracrine factors.
• Disclosed herein are two classes of implantable bioreactors. Class I includes bioreactors designed for systemic delivery of produced bio-products. Class II includes bioreactors designed for local delivery of produced bio-products at the target tissue. Both classes encompass embodiments for implantation via open surgery, percutaneous techniques, or any other technique to effect implantation. Both classes, in various embodiments, can adhere to a medical device.
• Class I implantable bioreactor for systemic delivery. In one embodiment, the systemic delivery implantable bioreactor comprises an enclosure housing stem cells and/or other cell types which produce and release paracrine factors. The enclosure comprises, in one embodiment, a physical enclosure fabricated with a semi-porous membrane, or in another embodiment fabricated with a microporous polymer matrix encapsulating the cells. The enclosure includes micropores impermeable to cells, but of sufficient size to allow free permeation of fluid so that biomolecules, waste and nutrients can be transferred efficiently and without hindrance. In one embodiment, the implantable bioreactor is deployed in the intravascular space (such as central veins and large arteries), but implantation into any other body cavity, tissue, blood vessel, or organ is also contemplated. In one embodiment, the implantable bioreactor is temporarily implanted and retrieved later. In another embodiment, the implantable bioreactor remains indefinitely as a permanent implant.
• In another embodiment of a systemic delivery bioreactor, the implantable bioreactor comprises a membranous pouch which contains within its lumen stem cells and other cell types and/or media to enhance the viability of the stem cells and which is constructed of a semi-permeable membrane which shields the cells from immunologic attack and allows the release of the paracrine factors and other biomolecules. In various embodiments, the membranous pouch can be (a) stand-alone, in which case it can be surgically implanted, or (b) mounted on a wire or catheter, in which case it can be percutaneously implanted, or (c) mounted as part of another implantable device, in which case it can be implanted along with the other device. In an embodiment, the membranous pouch can be pre-filled with its intended contents or, if attached to a catheter, filled and potentially emptied and re-filled during and after implantation. When percutaneously implanted, the device can be passed via a vascular sheath (as illustrated inFIG. 2).
• Stand-alone Membranous Pouch-based bioreactor. In an embodiment, the bioreactor is a stand-alone membranous pouch designed to be surgically implanted. Material composition: The pouch housing is made of a semi-permeable membrane with a pre-defined molecular weight cut-off designed to effectively restrict movement of cells, but allow free transfer of paracrine factors, nutrients, and waste. The membrane can be composed of a wide spectrum of cellulosic (such as cellulose acetate) and synthetic materials (such as polysulfone, polyamide, polyacrylonitrile, and their copolymers, polymethylmetacrylate, polytetrafluroethylene and their various derivatives, silicon carbide, and micro-machined porous silicon diaphragms, among others). Coatings: As long as membrane porosity is not disturbed, the interior surface of the pouch can be coated with molecules which enhance stem cell attachment and function. The exterior of the pouch can be coated with anticoagulants to minimize thrombosis, and/or other substances to improve deliverability. This adjustment of coatings is well known to those of ordinary skill in the art. Geometry: The physical shape of the pouch can be designed to incorporate surface undulations and crevices to maximize surface area for mass transfer. Bioreactor contents: Any number of stem cells and/or other cell types or cells with and/or without genetic alterations can be used in the device based, in part, on the type of injury and organ that is being targeted for regeneration. The cells can be used stand-alone or bathed in a media containing any number of proteins, growth factors, or other molecules.
• Catheter-mounted Membranous Pouch-based bioreactor. In an embodiment the bioreactor is a pouch bioreactor, as described above, which is attached to catheter tubing with ports connecting the pouch lumen to the catheter exterior, allowing infusion, sampling, and circulation of cells and media. In another embodiment, multiple lumens within the housing of the catheter can provide additional options for continuous circulation of stem cells within the pouch, and an open distal port can be used as an intravenous line or for central venous pressure measurement (as illustrated inFIG. 3). Alternatively, the pouch bioreactor can be mounted directly on a wire.
• The catheter housing can made of polyvinyl chloride tubing (or any other suitable biocompatible material) composed of a multitude of lumens, proximal access ports and distal apertures, similar to standard multi-lumen central venous catheters. These ports can be used for removal and/or replacement of cells, media, or other substances which may promote maintenance of the cells and/or enhance their function. Coatings: The surface of the catheter upon which the bioreactor is mounted and the portion of which is inside of the bioreactor can be coated with molecules which enhance stem cell attachment and function. Some of these molecules include polylysine, fibronectin, or other proteins with Arg-Gly-Asp sequences. This can be accomplished by first oxidizing the catheter surface in a plasma reactor or with chemical oxidizing agents such as potassium permanganate, then reacting the surface with the appropriate molecular functional group. The exterior of the catheter can also be spray- or dip-coated with an anti-coagulant (such as heparin) to minimize thrombus formation during and following implantation. Air-filled guiding balloon: A small balloon (˜1 cm in diameter) can be placed near the tip of the catheter, which upon filling with air, can assist in guiding intravascular placement. Guidewire directability is provided by incorporation of a channel for the introduction of a steerable and removable guidewire within the device. Bioreactor contents: Any number of stem cells and/or other cell types or cells with and/or without genetic alterations can be used in the device based on the type of injury and organ that is being targeted for regeneration. The cells could be used stand-alone or bathed in a media containing any number of proteins, growth factors, or other molecules. The device would also allow for slow infusion, intermittent recycling or continuous circulation of cells, cell-conditioned media, concentrated paracrine factors, or any other fluids that are determined to have a beneficial effect. Removability: The catheter-based device can be easily removed when desired. The pouch housing is first evacuated by withdrawing its contents through the infusion port. Vacuum is then created allowing the pouch to collapse to a small profile facilitating removal. The entire device can then be pulled out of the body. The vascular sheath is removed and manual compression or vascular closure devices, if needed, can be used to achieve hemostasis.
• Secondary device-mounted pouch-based bioreactor. In an embodiment, pouch bioreactors as described above can be attached to various other secondary devices and implanted with the device. The pouch bioreactors can be miniaturized as needed to attach to the secondary device. In the cardiovascular arena, secondary devices include, but are not limited to, stents, intra-aortic balloon pumps, percutaneous and surgically implanted ventricular assist devices, percutaneous and surgically implanted prosthetic valves and valve clips or rings, endovascular grafts, thrombus filters, pacemaker or defibrillator surfaces or leads, septal occluders, atrial appendage closure devices, pulmonary artery catheters, venous catheters, and arterial catheters, among others. Outside the cardiovascular arena, any implantable device conferring access to a target tissue is a possible candidate for attaching a pouch-based bioreactor. These variations are evident to one of ordinary skill in the art.
• Encapsulant-based cell enclosure. In an embodiment, an implantable encapsulant-based bioreactor consists of a matrix encapsulating desired cells and media coated on a surface. The matrix can be (a) coated directly to a tissue surface or (b) coated on a separate implantable device. The matrix can be pre-formed and stored for later use, or stored in its individual component reactants and then prepared on site when needed. The matrix can be composed of a number of polymers including but not limited to polyethylene glycol (PEG), hyaluronic acid, chitosan, dextran, collagen or self-assembling oligopeptides. Factors such as the arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) oligopeptide can also be incorporated within the matrix to assist in stem cell adhesion and enhance proliferation and function. The matrix used will be porous enough to allow free transfer of growth factors, nutrients and wastes, while restricting mobility of stem cells. At its lower dimensional limit, single cells can be encapsulated using this method. For example, a hydrogel matrix, which is typically 90% water, is porous enough to allow free transfer of growth factors and other substances, yet will restrict mobility of stem cells. Also arising from the high water content are the excellent anti-fouling properties of the free surface.
• Direct tissue coating. In an embodiment, matrices encapsulating desired cells and media are directly coated onto a tissue surface. This can be performed via either direct surgical exposure of the target tissue, or through percutaneous injection into the target tissue or into a surface or potential space (e.g., pericardial sac, peritoneal space) around the target tissue.
• Coating onto an implantable device. In an embodiment, matrices encapsulating desired cells and media are applied to a secondary implantable device. Application of the matrix to the device can be via dip-coating, spray-coating, spin-coating, or any other method that achieves adequate adhesion of the matrix to the implantable device. Coating may be performed long a priori or immediately before device implantation. In the cardiovascular arena, possible secondary implantable devices include, but are not limited to the pouch-based bioreactor, a microfabricated cellular enclosure, stents, intra-aortic balloon pumps, percutaneous and surgically implanted ventricular assist devices, percutaneous and surgically implanted prosthetic valves and valve clips or rings, endovascular grafts, thrombus filters, pacemaker or defibrillator surfaces or leads, septal occluders, atrial appendage closure devices, pulmonary artery catheters, venous catheters, and arterial catheters, among others. Outside the cardiovascular arena, any implantable device conferring access to a target tissue is a possible candidate for coating with the matrices.
• Class II implantable bioreactor for local delivery. Local delivery of paracrine factors confers dual advantages of direct targeting of diseased tissue and reduction or prevention of any systemic side effects. In an embodiment, an implanted device is coated with cells using cell-specific ligands or antibodies as cell anchors. In another embodiment, a cell micro-enclosure, constructed using micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) fabrication technology, is disclosed, for implantation in small target tissues, such as the intracoronary space. In another embodiment, miniaturized forms of the bioreactors of Class I can be utilized for local delivery when the bioreactor is deployed at the appropriate target location.
• Stand-alone cell coated device. Any implantable device (including any of the embodiments described herein) can be coated with a monolayer of a desired cell type possibly involving the use of cell-specific ligands or antibodies as anchors. For stem cells, anchoring ligands and antibodies include, but are not limited to RGD oligopeptides and those oligopeptides containing the sequence Ile-Lys-Val-Ala-Val, as well as anti-CD34, and anti-CD31. The coated device can be prepared prior to implantation by immersing it in a solution containing the appropriate cell type. In addition, native cells may attach after implantation. For instance, if the goal is myocardial healing and regeneration post infarction, an intracoronary stent could be coated with stem cell-specific ligands and antibodies and then immersed in a solution containing stem cells before coronary implantation.
• Cell coat and overcoat. A variation of this embodiment for cells susceptible to immunologic attack would be to bind the cells to the desired surfaces using appropriate ligands/antibodies as described above and, in addition, layer above these cells an overcoat of a semi-permeable matrix or a semi-permeable membrane. The semi-permeable matrix or membrane would confer immunologic isolation while allowing free permeation of bio-molecules, fluids, nutrients, and waste.
• Microfabricated cellular enclosure. Cell enclosures of specific dimensions, pre-determined porosity and pore patterns can be fabricated using microfabrication technology. These enclosures can be constructed to be far smaller and with far more precise pore characteristics than available semi-permeable membranes. The pores can be designed to be impermeable to cells, yet freely permeable to fluid, nutrients, paracrine factors and/or other bio-products, wastes and nutrients. The enclosures can be coated with cell-specific ligands, antibodies or other factors which are well known to those of ordinary skill in the art to facilitate cell adhesion and proliferation. The enclosures can be used stand-alone or attached to a separate implantable device. In one embodiment, the micro-enclosures are filled with stem cells and/or other cells and are bonded to a coronary stent for myocardial healing and regeneration after infarction.
• In one embodiment, microporous cellular enclosures can be fabricated from silicon wafers. Using photolithographic techniques, multiple pores of specific diameters (e.g. 0.1 μm to 15 μm) can be etched into the device layer of a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafer. This is followed by creating cell cavities by etching multiple large trenches into the handle wafer side. The handle wafer trenches can be positioned directly beneath the device layer pores using backside alignment. The buried oxide between the two silicon surfaces can then be removed, releasing the silicon semi-permeable membrane. The enclosure can then be coated with cell specific ligands and antibodies. Finally, stem cells and/or other cell types, drug, and growth media can then be placed in the trenches before sealing the cavity. Repeated iterations of this process can yield porous silicon enclosures (as illustrated inFIG. 4) that can then be bonded to a coronary stent.
• Miniaturized bioreactor. The implantable bioreactors described herein can all be used for local delivery with appropriate miniaturization and placement. Pouch-based enclosures could be miniaturized through micromachining. Thin, uniform coatings of the matrix-encapsulated cells could be produced using spray-coating or spin-coating. In another variation, direct micro-injection of matrix-encapsulated cells into target diseased tissue can be used as a strategy for local delivery.
EXAMPLES
• The examples presented herein illustrate, but are not intended to limit, the scope of protection being sought.
Example 1Stem Cell Viability and Paracrine Factor Release from Miniature Bioreactors In Vitro
• Methods. To determine whether stem cells can survive in, and produce and release paracrine factors from the cellulose acetate semi-permeable membrane used in the implantable pouch-type bioreactor prototype, we devised an experimental model using miniature versions of the device chamber. In this model, short segments of the semi-permeable membrane with 10⁶kDa pores were fashioned into tubes, and the ends secured with sterile suture; in addition, limited experiments have been performed to date using 10⁵kDa pore membrane. One million human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) or bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMNCs) were injected into the lumen of the chamber, and then the entire device was submerged in cell culture media for incubation (seeFIG. 1). Samples of the media outside the device were taken at 24 hrs, 72 hrs, and 7 days for the 10⁶kDa experiments. All samples underwent measurement of 8 different paracrine factors (PFs) by Quansys Q-Plex Human Angiogenesis Array (n=3−6). This micro-array can simultaneously assess for the presence and quantity of: Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF), Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor (bFGF), Interleukin-8 (IL-8), Tissue Metalloproteinase Inhibitors 1 and 2, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-BB (PDGF-BB), and Tissue Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF-α). Multiple 1 mL aliquots of the conditioned media were collected at stored at −80 C until the time of analysis. Results of media collected from mini-bioreactors containing stem cells were compared to those from mini-bioreactors not containing stem cells media as controls. In addition, at each time point bioreactors were opened and cells within were removed for cell viability assessment using trypan blue exclusion (n=3).
• Results: Paracrine Factor Production. Samples of cell culture media collected from outside of 10⁶kDa mini-bioreactors containing MSCs showed substantial production of VEGF, HGF, IL-8, TIMP-1, and TIMP-2 that increased with time. Production of bFGF was detected at 24 h, but decreased over time. The remaining factors, PDGF-BB, and TNF-α were not detected.
• [000361 Conditioned media samples taken from outside mini-bioreactors containing BMMNCs showed production and release of relevant paracrine factors as well, but in a pattern different from that of the MSCs. BMMNCs showed increasing production of IL-8, TIMP-1, and TIMP-2 over time, with production of IL-8 substantially greather than that of the MSCs. TNF-α was detected as well, though decreased over time. The factors VEGF, HGF, bFGF, and PDGF-BB were not detected (see Table below) in conditioned media taken from experiments using BMMNCs.

• TABLE
  Stem Cell Viability and Paracrine Factor Production from Miniature Bioreactors
  made using 106kDa Cellulose Acetate Semi-Permeable Membrane.

  Average Analyte Concentration Mean (pg/mL)

  PDGF-

  Cell Type	t	n	Viability	VEGF	HGF	bFGF	IL-8	BB	TIMP-1	TIMP-2	TNFα

  MSCs

  24

  h

  6

  89.4%

  112.6

  0.0

  60.9

  8.6

  0.0

  7903.2

  2118.5

  0.0

  SD

  6.3

  0.0

  6.3

  3.0

  0.0

  8818.0

  595.7

  0.0

  72

  h

  6

  79.1%

  236.5

  112.1

  31.5

  18.2

  0.0

  3339.3

  7799.2

  0.0

  SD

  57.7

  25.2

  5.3

  4.2

  0.0

  587.7

  2191.3

  0.0

  7

  d

  6

  75.4%

  676.4

  348.0

  29.5

  97.5

  0.0

  89544.8

  8165.1

  0.0

  SD

  81.2

  61.5

  5.2

  87.5

  0.0

  133399.7

  2245.8

  0.0

  Control

  24

  h

  3

  n/a

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  (no cells)

  SD

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  72

  h

  3

  n/a

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  SD

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  7

  d

  3

  n/a

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  SD

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  BMMNCs

  24

  h

  6

  78.4%

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  1497.7

  0.0

  327.3

  0.0

  76.9

  SD

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  637.0

  0.0

  40.6

  0.0

  41.3

  72

  h

  6

  64.2%

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  4418.5

  0.0

  1063.1

  84.8

  49.2

  SD

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  2712.4

  0.0

  296.6

  10.6

  13.4

  7

  d

  3

  61.5%

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  6855.7

  0.0

  1927.9

  447.5

  23.7

  SD

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  647.5

  0.0

  201.3

  79.1

  2.5

  Control

  24

  h

  3

  n/a

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  (no cells)

  SD

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  72

  h

  3

  n/a

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  SD

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  7

  d

  3

  n/a

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  	SD			0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0

• Stem Cell Viability. Assessment of MSC and BMMNC viability in mini-bioreactors made of 10⁶kDa cellulose acetate membrane at 24 h, 72 h, and 7 d showed substantial cell viability with 89.4%, 79.1%, and 75.4% for MSCs, respectively, and 78.4%, 64.2%, and 61.5% for BMMNCs (see Table above).
• Summary. These experiments demonstrate that two types of stem cells, MSCs and BMMNCs, survive for up to seven days in culture in miniature bioreactor chambers made of the same 10⁶kDa cellulose acetate membrane used for the catheter-based implantable bioreactor prototype, and that during this time release paracrine factors (PFs) relevant to angiogenesis and tissue repair. The amount and type of PFs released by MSCs differ from those of BMMNCs. It is yet unclear whether this represents an intrinsic difference in the cell types, or a differential response to growth within the cellulose acetate membrane. Overall, these results suggest that the 10⁶kDa cellulose acetate semi-permeable membrane is compatible with MSC and BMMNC cell survival and PF release, though there are differences in the combination of PFs released by the . different cell types.
Example 2Implantation of Bioreactor Prototype in Farm Pig
• Methods. Bioreactor prototype devices were implanted in two farm pigs (˜25kg). Each device was fashioned from 10⁶kDa cellulose acetate semi-permeable membrane secured to an 8F clinical grade multi-lumen catheter. In both cases a surgical cut-down procedure was performed over the right neck to expose the external jugular vein (EJ) after initiation of general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation. Using fluoroscopic guidance, a 14F vascular sheath was inserted in the EJ over the wire. The bioreactor device prototype was then passed through the sheath and advanced to the junction of the superior vena cava (SVC) and right atrium (RA). In the first experiment the device was left in place for 1 hour, after which a suspension of 2.5×10⁶human MSCs was injected into the device. The device was then left in place for another 90 minutes, during which continuous ECG monitoring and intermittent fluoroscopic venography were performed, the latter to determine whether there was any impediment to blood return to the heart via the EJ/SVC. The device was then removed and inspected and the animal euthanized using potassium chloride infusion.
• In the second experiment the bioreactor prototype was again advanced to the SVC-RA junction, and a suspension of 2×10⁶human MSCs were infused into the bioreactor chamber via the catheter lumen. The bioreactor and vascular sheath were then sutured in place and the surgical wound closed. The animal was then allowed to awaken and the device was maintained in place for 24 hours. The animal was then returned to the surgical suite and general anesthesia induced. Fluoroscopic venography was performed as previously and the device removed for inspection. The animal was then euthanized as above.
• Results. In both experiments, the prototype bioreactor was well tolerated with no evidence of vascular, hemodynamic, or arrhythmic compromise. Fluoroscopic venography showed no evidence of vascular compromise or intra-vascular thrombus formation during either the 2.5 hours the device was in place during the first experiment, or after 24 hours in the second experiment. In the second experiment small amounts of thrombus were found at both ends of the bioreactor lumen, where the cellulose acetate membrane was secured to the catheter shaft, but none on the membrane itself. The addition of MSCs to the bioreactor lumen did not appear to affect biocompatibility of the device.
• Summary. These preliminary results suggest that the prototype bioreactor device is well tolerated in vivo for up to 24 hours with no evidence of vascular, hemodynamic, or arrhythmic compromise. The presence of a small amount of thrombus at the attachment points of the bioreactor chamber to the vascular catheter indicates the need for further optimization; however, the cellulose acetate membrane itself appears biocompatible.
Example 3Hydrogel for Stem Cell Encapsulation and Intravascular Deployment
• Hydrogel Crosslink Chemistry. We describe a method for immobilizing stem cells on the surfaces of an implantable stent using a biologically inert hydrogel coating. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) was chosen to encapsulate the stem cells because of its biocompatibility, antifouling properties, and permeability to biomolecules. It is a neutral, water-soluble polymer that forms hydrogels when crosslinked in the presence of water. Crosslinks form in our proprietary system through the reaction between N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS)-activated esters and amine groups. The two functional groups react to form an amide bond with the loss of the NHS group. The reaction rate is greatest at a pH between 7 and 10 and is much slower at a pH below 6. This difference in reaction rates allows for convenient handling of the liquid hydrogel precursor at at pH of 6, while raising the pH slightly to physiologic pH (7.4) results in immediate solidification. To form a fully crosslinked gel, we mix a PEG molecule with two or more activated ester groups (NHS-PEG) and a PEG molecule with 2 or more amine groups (amine-PEG) to generate a 3-dimensional hydrogel polymer network. The higher the average functionality, the more rapidly a gel forms for any given number of crosslinks. A hydrogel is formed by mixing an 8-arm polyethylene glycol molecule with 8 NHS-activated esters with a diamine-functionalized polyethylene glycol. The average functionality of 5 for this system is chosen to efficiently generate fully crosslinked gels.
• 
• This NHS ester/amine reaction was chosen for its low toxicity, biocompatibility, and the convenience of triggering the reaction using a mild pH change. Other polyethylene glycol hydrogels are more commonly formed by a photoinitiated radical polymerization. Although stem cells have been shown to survive photopolymerization, the procedure employs UV light to generate free radicals, both of which are usually used to sterilize samples, and hence may harm the stem cells.
• Note that other polymerization chemistries are possible, such as isocyanate/amine, epoxy/amine, isothiocyanate/amine, alcohol/glutamate, and thiol/maleimide. Although most of these reaction chemistries may be used in lieu of the current NHS ester/amine reaction, many have higher toxicity, sub-optimal reaction kinetics, and do not have the advantage of being able to “switch” on and off with such a mild pH change.
• Polymer Precursor Concentration. The hydrogels initially contain between 5% and 50% organic solids by weight, with water constituting the remainder. After the gel is formed, it expands to many times its own weight, typically 4×-5×, by soaking up additional water. Water will continue to absorb until the gel reaches equilibrium, which is usually around 5%-10% organic solids by weight. For this system, higher initial solid fractions facilitate more efficient crosslinking reactions between the NHS-PEG and diamine-PEG. The greater reaction efficiency can be seen by the finding that a higher initial solid fraction results in a higher final solid fraction (FIG. 8). As will be described below, denser, less swollen films have a higher crosslink density.
• Hydrogel Crosslink Density. Generally speaking, the equilibrium fraction of organic solids in a hydrogel (υ_p) increases with increasing crosslink density (ρ_x, crosslinks per volume, given in mol/L), and decreases with the molecular weight of the polyethylene glycol between crosslinks (M_c).
• ${\rho }_x=-\frac{1}{\stackrel{\_}{v}}\left(\frac{\ln \left(1-{\upsilon }_p\right)+{\upsilon }_p+\chi {\upsilon }_p^2}{{\upsilon }_p^{1/3}-{\upsilon }_p^2/2}\right)$
• whereυ is the molar volume of water and χ is the Flory-Huggins chi parameter.
• ${\rho }_x=\frac{2}{f_{\mathrm{av}}}\frac{\rho }{M_c}$
• where f_avis the average functionality of the monomers, and ρ is the density. The same phenomenon is observed for proprietary gels.
• 1000521 The molecular weight of the polymer precursor is typically chosen to control the crosslink density. Typical values range from 1000 g/mol to 100,000 g/mol. Note that high molecular weight leads to lower crosslink densities and lower stiffness. The other mitigating factor is the reaction conversion. Low conversions decrease the crosslink density, increase the effective molecular weight between crosslinks, and decrease the elastic modulus.
• Cell Adhesion. To improve cell viability, it is desirable to allow cells to adhere to the hydrogel and pull themselves into a state of tension. Viability frequently correlates with the lens-like shape the cells take when they successfully form focal adhesion sites with the surrounding matrix whereas a lack of adhesion is characterized by a spherical cell morphology and generally leads to apoptosis. For our proprietary recipe, the addition of arginine-glycine-aspartine (RGD) oligopeptides facilitates the formation of focal adhesion points through the specific interactions between RGD and integrin. Typical concentrations ranging from 1-20 mM are used to promote cell adhesion.
• Our formulation uses cyclo (Arg-Gly-Asp-d-Phe-Lys). The additional lysine residue has a free amine group, which reacts with the NHS-PEG to become incorporated into the hydrogel. The cyclic RGD ring is not strictly required, but it confers greater stability and selectivity over linear RGD peptides.
• 
• Stent Adhesive Layer. The final step is to adjust the pH to a level at which the nucleophilic addition reaction occurs at the fastest rate. NHS-activated PEG tends to lower the pH to a level at which the reaction occurs too slowly, so a small amount of base is typically needed to raise the pH to 7.4, at which the reaction proceeds rapidly to completion.
• In our system, we designed an adhesive layer that automatically adjusts the pH from 6 to 7.4. This convenient method makes it possible to prepare the hydrogel precursor and add stem cells and/or other cell types when it is a liquid, and then solidify the gel only after it coats the stent, or another device. The gel precursor solution containing the stem cells and/or other cell types may be painted, sprayed, or dip-coated onto the stent or another secondary device. Gelation typically occurs within ten minutes of coming in contact with the gel precursor solution.
• Consisting of poly(allylamine) (PAAM) and hexamethylene diisocyanate (HMDI), the adhesive coating is formed by first dipping the stent into a 5% solution of PAAM in water. The stent is then dipped into a 5% solution of HMDI in isopropanol. The HMDI rapidly reacts with the PAAM to form polyurea crosslinks. Since the reaction does not proceed with precise stoichiometry, it will always leave behind a small fraction of amine and isocyanate groups. To ensure that the excess amine groups do not increase the pH too strongly, the coated stent is soaked and rinsed in phosphate buffered saline at a pH of 7.4 until the pH stabilizes at 7.4.
• 
• The excess of basic amine groups in this adhesive coating subsequently increase the pH of the hydrogel precursor solution to initiate the polymerization. These amine groups are free to react with NHS-PEG in the hydrogel precursor solution. HMDI serves a dual function as well: it crosslinks the PAAM by forming polyurea bonds, and any excess isocyanate groups are also free to crosslink with diamine-PEG in the hydrogel precursor solution.
• Recipe. To make 200 μL of hydrogel, add 50 mg of N-hydroxysuccinimide-activated polyethylene glycol with 8 activated ester groups (8 arm NHS-PEG, MW=40 kg/mol) to 65 μL of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) at pH 7.4. Stir until dissolved. Excess carboxylic acid groups that are invariably present on the 8 arm NHS-PEG cause the pH to drop to about 6 or lower. Next, add 60 μL of a 10 mg/mL solution of cyclo (arginine-glycine-aspartine-d-phenylalanine-lysine) (RGD-lysine), and 75 μL of a 400 mg/mL solution of polyethylene glycol-diamine (PEG-diamine, MW=2 kg/mol). Finally, the pH is adjusted with sodium hydroxide to 7 to drive the polymerization to completion. Gelation occurs shortly thereafter.
• This mixture provides a hydrogel that is roughly 40% solids by weight. It gives an RGD concentration of 5 mM, and uses a 1.5:1 ratio of amine groups to activated esters in order to achieve gelation. Once placed in aqueous buffer solution such as PBS and allowed to equilibrate, the hydrogel absorbs water and swells to give a final composition that is between 5% and 10% solids by weight.
Example 4Microfabricated Cellular Enclosures: Detailed Materials & Methods
• Silicon-on-Insulator (SOI) wafers (4″ diameter with a 1-2 micron thick buried silicon oxide layer sandwiched between a 50-micron thick device layer and a 200-250 micron thick handle layer) were cleaned using Piranha solution (H₂SO₄/H₂O₂) and a de-ionized water rinse and blow dried using nitrogen gas.
• The handle layer (which is to contain the cell reservoir) was processed first. The handle layer was patterned using photoresist (AZ9260 to a thickness of 14-15 microns cured at 110° C. for 3 to 4 min) so that the silicon can be etched using a Surface Technology Systems Deep Reactive Ion Etcher (STS DRIE) system. In addition, the surface of the device layer was coated with a 1-2 micron thick layer of photoresist (Shipley 1800 cured at 100° C. for 1 min) to provide added structural strength so that the backside helium flow for the STS DRIE does not cause rupture. Etching was performed completely through the handle layer until the buried oxide layer (BOX) etch-stop was reached. The wafer was then cleaned in acetone at room temperature for 30 to 60 min, sequentially soaked in isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and de-ionized water, and dried in a convection oven at 95° C. for 20 min. The drying process minimized the chances of damaging the fragile device layer.
• The device layer (which is to contain the semi-permeable diaphragm) was processed next. The device layer was patterned to specific pore sizes and pore-to-pore dimensions with photoresist (Shipley SC 1800, 2 microns thick, cured at 100° C. for 2 min), taking care to match the photoresist pattern on the device layer with the locations of the cell reservoirs on the handle layer on the back-side. To further structurally protect the device layer in processing, it was mounted to a secondary supporting silicon wafer using liquid CrystalBond spun onto the secondary supporting wafer at 2500 rpm and cured at 100-110° C. for 30-45 sec. After the bonded wafer was allowed to cool to room-temperature, the device wafer layer was etched using the STS DRIE system and intermittently cooled between batches of etching cycles to assure continued structural integrity.
• At completion of the device wafer etch, individual cellular micro-enclosures were separated from the wafer. The entire wafer was over-coated with photo-resist (Shipley SC 1800 series) from protection, diced on a diamond saw, and soaked in acetone for 24-48 hours to separate the diced micro-enclosures from the secondary supporting wafer. The individual micro-enclosures were then thoroughly cleaned in repeated washes with heated acetone, isopropyl alcohol and de-ionized water, followed by drying in a convection oven for 15-20 min at 95° C.
• Finally, the intermediate buried oxide layer was removed by dipping the micro-enclosures in 49% hydrofluoric acid. Cleaning of the micro-enclosures was then performed in sequential washings in de-ionized water, isopropyl alcohol, followed by final cleaning and sterilization in oxygen plasma using a Trion RIE (Reactive Ion Etcher).

Claims (27)

1. An implantable bioreactor comprising a housing comprising cells which can produce paracrine factors; wherein the housing comprises a barrier that shields the enclosed cells from immunological attack and permits the transfer of paracrine factors out of the housing.

2. The implantable bioreactor ofclaim 1, wherein the cells are stem cells.

3. The implantable bioreactor ofclaim 2, wherein the stem cells are selected from the group consisting of embryonic stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells, whole bone marrow stem cells, adipose-derived stem cells, myocardial derived stem cells and endothelial progenitor stem cells.

4. The implantable bioreactor ofclaim 1, wherein said housing is selected from the group consisting of a pouch, a semi-permeable membrane, a polymer matrix, a matrix gel and a microfabricated cellular enclosure.

5. The implantable bioreactor ofclaim 1, wherein said housing is composed of cellulosic and/or synthetic materials.

6. The implantable bioreactor ofclaim 5, wherein said cellulosic material is cellulose acetate.

7. The implantable bioreactor ofclaim 5, wherein said synthetic material is selected from the group consisting of polysulfone, polyamide, polacrylonitrile, copolymers thereof, polymethylmetacrylate, polytetrafluroethylene and derivatives thereof, silicon carbide and micro-mechanical porous silicon diaphragms.

8. The implantable bioreactor ofclaim 1, wherein said bioreactor is a pouch-based bioreactor.

9. The implantable bioreactor ofclaim 8, wherein the pouch-based bioreactor is mounted on a wire, a catheter or as part of another implantable device.

10. The implantable bioreactor ofclaim 4, wherein the polymer matrix is selected from the group consisting of polyethylene glycol, hyaluronic acid, chitosan, dextran, collagen and self-assembling oligopeptides.

11. The implantable bioreactor ofclaim 4, wherein the matrix gel is a cross-linked hydrogel.

12. The implantable bioreactor ofclaim 11, wherein the cross-linked hydrogel is selected from the group consisting of a N-hydroxysuccinimide ester/amine conjugate, an isocyanate/amine conjugate, an epoxy/amine conjugate, an isothiocyanate/amine conjugate, an alcohol/glutamate conjugate, and a thiol/maleimide conjugate.

13. The implantable bioreactor ofclaim 1, wherein the bioreactor is adhered to a medical device.

14. The implantable bioreactor ofclaim 4, wherein the housing is a microfabricated cellular enclosure.

15. The implantable bioreactor ofclaim 14, wherein the microfabricated cellular enclosure comprises a silicon-permeable membrane.

16. The implantable bioreactor ofclaim 14, wherein the microfabricated cellular enclosure is adhered to a medical device.

17. A method of making an implantable bioreactor comprising combining a housing with cells capable of producing paracrine factors.

18. The method ofclaim 17, wherein the cells are selected from the group consisting of embryonic stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells, adipose-derived stem cells, whole bone marrow stem cells, myocardial derived stem cells and endothelial progenitor stem cells.

19. The method ofclaim 17, wherein the housing is selected from the group consisting of a pouch, a semi-permeable membrane, a polymer matrix, a matrix gel and a microfabricated cellular enclosure.

20. The method ofclaim 17, wherein the implantable bioreactor is adhered to a medical device.

21. A medical device comprising a bioreactor comprising a housing comprising cells which can produce paracrine factors; wherein the housing comprises a barrier that shields the enclosed cells from immunological attack and permits the transfer of paracrine factors out of the housing.

22. The medical device ofclaim 21, wherein the medical device is a stent, intra-aortic balloon pump, ventricular assist device, prosthetic valve, prosthetic valve clip, prosthetic valve ring, thrombus filter, pacemaker, defibrillator, pacemaker or defibrillator wire, septal occluder, atrial appendage device, pulmonary artery catheter, venous catheter or arterial catheter.

23. The medical device ofclaim 22, wherein the bioreactor housing is selected from the group consisting of a pouch, a semi-permeable membrane, a polymer matrix, a matrix gel and a microfabricated cellular enclosure.

24. The medical device ofclaim 23, wherein the matrix gel is a cross-linked hydrogel.

25. The medical device ofclaim 23, wherein the medical device is a stent and the bioreactor housing is a matrix gel.

26. The medical device ofclaim 25 wherein the matrix gel is a cross-linked hydrogel.

27. The medical device ofclaim 23, wherein the medical device is a stent and the bioreactor housing is a microfabricated cellular enclosure.

Images