REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application claims the priority of United Kingdom Patent Application No. 0922107.8 filed 18 Dec. 2009, the entire contents of which are incorporate herein by reference.
FIELD OF THE INVENTIONThe present invention relates to a brush bar for a surface treating appliance, for example for a vacuum cleaning appliance.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTIONBrush bars generally comprise a hollow supporting body, which is normally cylindrical, and a plurality of bristle tufts secured to the supporting body. The bristles themselves are commonly formed from a relatively wear-resistant material such as Nylon (PA); however, for reasons of economy, the supporting body is often formed instead from a cheaper material, such as Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) or Polypropylene (PP).
The bristle tufts have conventionally been mechanically secured to the cylindrical body by stapling. The use of staples is normally effective in retaining the bristle tufts during use of the brush bar, but the method requires a relatively large wall thickness, partly to ensure that once the staple is driven down into the brush bar, there is then sufficient friction between the staple and the brush bar in order adequately to secure the tuft during normal use of the brush bar. For example, in the case of a vacuum cleaning appliance, the bristle tufts are typically secured to resist a nominal pull force of 40N, and in this case a local brush bar wall thickness of around 8 mm is typically required. The increased local wall thickness may be provided by one or more helical ribs on the supporting body; these helical ribs are arranged to run on the inside of the hollow supporting body so as to limit the undesirable presence of discontinuities in the outer surface of the brush bar.
In some surface treating appliances, the brush bar is driven by a motor. The motor is often located outside the brush bar, and connected to the brush bar by some sort of intermediate transmission such as a drive belt, normally via fixed reduction gearing. However, it has also been proposed to house the motor inside the brush bar as a space-saving measure. In this sort of arrangement, the wall thickness of a given brush bar can become a limiting factor on the motor design, and particularly on the overall size of the motor which can be used. It would be preferable therefore to reduce the wall thickness of the brush bar, and hence increase the interior volume of the brush bar for a given external diameter of the brush bar. It is envisaged that reducing the wall thickness would also have the advantage of reducing like-for-like material costs and weight.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONIt is an object of the present invention to seek to provide an improved arrangement for securing bristle tufts to a brush bar, in particular an arrangement which is suitable for use on a relatively thin-walled brush bar.
According to the present invention there is provided a brush bar comprising a supporting body, at least one retaining member welded or surface-bonded to the supporting body and at least one bristle tuft secured on the supporting body, the bristle tuft being secured in place at least in part by mechanical interlocking of the retaining member either with the bristle tuft or with one or more intermediate anchor elements attached to the bristle tuft.
By “surface-bonded” is meant that the retaining member is bonded onto the outer external surface of the supporting body. Suitable bonding methods may include, for example, adhesive bonding or solid-state diffusion bonding.
The use of a weld or surface bond to attach the retaining member to the support body has the advantage that it removes (or at least significantly reduces) the conventional limitation on the wall thickness associated with the use of stapling. Consequently, a relatively thin-wall supporting body can be used. In addition, the use of a separate retaining member in order to clamp the bristle tuft means that clamping can be achieved without having locally to deform and re-shape the supporting body around the bristle tuft in order mechanically to clamp or lock the bristle tuft in place, tending to reduce post-production working of the supporting body.
Ultrasonic welding of the retaining member to the brush bar has been found to be particularly suitable, but other welding methods may be used. Where appropriate, the integrity of the weld may be controlled through appropriate choice of weld-compatible materials for the supporting body and the retaining member. In particular, the supporting body and the retaining member may be formed from the same material e.g. ABS or PP. Nevertheless, because the tuft is secured in place at least in part mechanically by the retaining member, at least some degree of retention of the bristle tuft is provided which is substantially independent of other material constraints imposed on the supporting body and retaining member. This has the advantage that corresponding welding constraints on the material used for the retaining member and supporting body are not directly imposed on the bristle tuft itself.
The bristle tuft may be welded or otherwise bonded to the retaining member or supporting body, in addition to being mechanically interlocked with the retaining member, such that the bristle tuft is only partly mechanically secured in place on the supporting body. Alternatively, the bristle tuft may be secured in place entirely by said mechanical interlocking of the retaining member with the bristle tuft or anchor element(s) (i.e. without it being necessary additionally to weld the bristle tuft or provide any other retention means). In the latter case, the operational retention of the bristles is entirely mechanical and therefore substantially independent of the material used to form the bristles; this has the advantage that none of the material weld constraints on the retaining member and supporting body are imposed on the bristle tuft itself. Thus, where the retaining member and brush bar are formed from the same or similar, weld-compatible materials such as ABS, PP or an ABS-PP blend, the bristles themselves may nevertheless be formed from an entirely different material, for example a relatively wear-resistant material such as Nylon.
The nature of the mechanical interlock between the bristle tuft and the retaining member may vary. For example, the bristle tuft may be clamped between the retaining member and the supporting body, the retaining member may be over-molded onto the bristle tuft, or the bristle tuft may be mechanically clamped between opposing portions of the retaining member.
The retaining member may form a collar around the bristle tuft for laterally supporting the bristles against excessive bending during use of the brush bar. The collar need only extend around a portion of the bristle tuft, though it is envisaged that in practice it would be particularly advantageous for the collar entirely to surround the bristle tuft in order to provide multi-directional support against bending.
The bristle tuft may extend through a hole in the retaining member. Thus, the retaining member forms a continuous surface around the bristle tuft. The retaining member may be in the shape of a washer, which may be circular or non-circular. The hole itself likewise need not be circular.
The anchor element may be welded or otherwise bonded to the bristle tuft, or it may formed by joining together the base of the bristles, for example by melting the bristles, possibly using hot gas.
The bristle tuft may comprise a plurality of pairs of bristles, each pair of bristles being formed by a single bristle filament looped underneath part of the anchor element or retaining member. In a particular arrangement, the anchor element is in the form of a locking pin and the bristle tuft comprises a plurality of pairs of bristles, each pair of bristles being formed by a single bristle filament looped underneath the locking pin. Preliminary tests have indicated that this arrangement provides a particularly secure retention of the bristle tufts. The locking pin itself may take various shapes. In particular, it may have any cross-sectional shape and may be curved, straight, or comprise curved sections and/or straight sections.
According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of manufacturing a brush bar having a supporting body and one or more bristle tufts secured on the support body, the method comprising securing at least one bristle tuft by welding or surface-bonding a retaining member onto the support body and mechanically interlocking the retaining member either directly with the bristle tuft or with an intermediate anchor element which consequently anchors the bristle tuft in place.
The retaining member may be welded to the support body using ultrasonic welding.
According to a yet further aspect of the present invention, there is provided an apparatus for over-molding an anchor element or retaining member onto a bristle tuft, the apparatus comprising a centrifugal mold having one or more mold cavities which incorporate a radially-extending bristle-retaining portion for retaining a bundle of bristles, and an outer over-mold portion configured to conform to the nominal shape of the anchor element or retaining member.
The over-molding apparatus according to the present invention may be used in a method of over-molding an anchor element or retaining member onto the bristle tuft, the method comprising placing a bundle of bristles in the bristle retaining portion of the mold cavity, subsequently injecting a thermoplastic resin into the mold cavity and simultaneously and/or subsequently rotating the mold in order to drive the thermoplastic resin into the over-mold portion of the cavity under centrifugal action.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGSEmbodiments of the invention will now be described by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a brush bar;
FIGS. 2aand2bare schematic cross-sectional views illustrating an arrangement for securing a bristle tuft to a brush bar using an anchor element;
FIG. 3 is a schematic cross-sectional view illustrating the effect of a collar portion of an anchor element in supporting a bristle tuft against bristle bending fatigue;
FIG. 4 is a schematic-cross sectional view showing an alternative form of anchor element;
FIG. 5 is a schematic plan view showing part of an apparatus for over-molding an anchor element on a bristle tuft;
FIG. 6ais an exploded perspective view illustrating a further arrangement for securing a bristle tuft to a brush bar, using an anchor element in the form of a locking pin;
FIG. 6bis a schematic cross-sectional view of the arrangement shown in exploded view inFIG. 6a;
FIG. 7 is an exploded perspective view showing illustrating a further arrangement for securing a bristle tuft to a supporting body of a brush bar;
FIG. 8 is a schematic cross-sectional view showing a yet further arrangement for securing a bristle tuft to a supporting body of a brush bar, wherein the bristle tuft is mechanically clamped between opposing portions of a retaining member;
FIG. 9 is a schematic cross-sectional view illustrating a process for clamping a bristle tuft with a retaining member; and
FIGS. 10,11 and12 are schematic cross-sectional views of the arrangements shown respectively inFIGS. 2,6 and8, in each case giving examples of suitable dimensions for various component parts of the respective arrangement.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTIONIn the embodiments described, corresponding features have been given the same reference numerals.
FIG. 1 shows abrush bar1 comprising a cylindrical supportingbody2 and a plurality ofbristle tufts3 secured to the cylindrical supportingbody2. In use in a surface treating appliance, the cylindrical supportingbody2 is typically mounted inside a cleaner head or floor tool for rotation about a rotation axis A, driven by a motor. Neither the motor nor any other features of the cleaner head or floor tool are shown inFIG. 1, however.
Thebristle tufts3 must be sufficiently secure to resist detachment from the supportingbody2 under maximum loading during use of thebrush bar1. In the case of a typical vacuum cleaner, this may equate to the bristle tuft being capable of resisting a pull force of around 40N and/or resisting bending fatigue failure during the course of approximately 95 million impacts per tuft (which, merely as an example, is based on 75% of an assumed 600 hour operational life for the brush bar and a brush bar speed of approximately 3500 rpm).
FIGS. 2aand2bshow a first arrangement for securing thebristle tufts3 to the supportingbody2. Here, the individual bristles in thebristle tuft3 are joined together at their base to form anenlarged root portion4, which is seated in arecess5 on the outer surface of the supportingbody2. Thebristle tuft3 is clamped in place on the supportingbody2 by a retainingmember6 which is welded to the supportingbody2 in order mechanically to lock theenlarged root portion4 in position within therecess5, firmly securing thebristle tuft3 on the supportingbody2. Theenlarged root portion4 thus acts as an anchor element for holding thebristle tuft3 in place on the supportingbody2.
The retainingmember6 is in the shape of a washer. In this case the retaining member is in the shape of an annular washer, but the retaining member may be in the shape of a non-circular washer such as a square washer. Thebristle tuft3 projects through a central hole in the retainingmember6 such that the retainingmember6 effectively constitutes a collar around thebristle tuft3. The formation of a collar around the bristle tuft resists lateral bending of thebristle tuft3 effectively by shifting the bristle fulcrum closer to the tip of the bristles, and may be used conveniently to reduce the risk of bending fatigue failure of thebristle tuft3 during use ofbrush bar1, where appropriate. The effect is illustrated inFIG. 3 which is a split-view showing, on the right, bending of bristles in the absence of a collar and, on the left, bending of bristles in the presence STOP of a collar; in this case, the collar is constituted by anannular lip6aon the retainingmember6. The hole itself need not be circular; it may for example be triangular, square or oblong.
Therecess5 is counter-bored to accommodate the retainingmember6, which sits on anannular shoulder5aformed by therespective counter-bore5b.The depth of the counter bore5bequates substantially to the depth of the retainingmember6; this has the advantage that the upper surface of the retainingmember6 is substantially continuous with the outer surface of the supportingbody2 so that there is little or no discontinuity on the outer surface of the supportingbody2, in the region of thebristle tuft3. In the arrangement shown inFIGS. 2aand2ba counter-bore6ais additionally formed in the underside of the retainingmember6 in order to accommodate the depth of theenlarged root portion4; the counter bore6amay not be required if theenlarged root portion4 is configured to be sufficiently shallow in depth to sit below the level of theshoulder5a.It will be appreciated that the retaining member may conveniently be formed so that it initially includes the relevant counter bores; the term “counter-bore” in this sense is not intended to be limited to a feature formed by ‘post-production’ boring of the retaining member and/or supporting body.
Theenlarged root portion4 may be formed by fusing the bristles together, for example using a hot gas or hot plate. The use of hot gas to form an enlarged portion on a bristle bundle per se is discussed in European Patent No. EP 1181144 (Schiffer); preliminary tests confirm that similar methods may be used to form theanchor element4 in the context of the present arrangement.
An alternative form of anchor element may be used. InFIG. 4, an anchor element in the form of a ‘puck’16 is ultrasonically butt-welded to thebristle tuft3 in conventional manner using a sonotrode. This method of forming the anchor element has the advantage that it is relatively quick—thepuck16 can generally be sonic-welded to the bristles in less than a second—although preliminary tests indicate that the resulting bristletuft3 may be more susceptible to bending fatigue failure during use of thebrush bar1, in which case the provision of a collar can be used to reduce the bending fatigue on the bristles, as discussed above. It is thought that the reduced resistance to bending fatigue may be as a result of gas bubbles being trapped in the region of the weld, and therefore it may also be possible to reduce bending fatigue by minimizing the formation of gas bubbles during the welding process, for example by reducing the amount of water vapor entering the weld zone.
The anchor element may alternatively be over-molded onto the bristle filaments forming thebristle tuft3.FIG. 5 illustrates a method for over-molding the anchor element using a centrifugal mold7. The mold7 is a two-part injection mold comprising abottom mold plate7a,shown inFIG. 5, and a top mold plate, not shown, which is configured for sealing engagement with themold plate7ato form a plurality of mold cavities8 (sixteenmold cavities8, in the case of the arrangement shown inFIG. 5). Eachmold cavity8 comprises a radial bristle-retainingportion8aand an outer,over-mold portion8bwhich conforms to the nominal shape of the anchor portion. Themold cavities8 are each in fluid communication with arespective runner9, which in turn communicate with an injection sprue (not shown) in the top mold plate.
The mold7 is mounted for high speed rotation about an axis B.
A bristle tuft is arranged radially inside eachmold cavity8, and is held in place by the walls of the bristle-retainingportion8a.Thermoplastic resin is then injected into therunners9 via the injection sprue in the top mold plate and the entire mold7 is rotated about the axis B such that the thermoplastic resin is forced outwardly under centrifugal action to fill theover-mold cavities8b.This method has the advantage that undesirable resin “creep” radially inwardly along the bristle tuft is opposed by the centrifugal action of the mold7.
Essentially the same process may be used to overmold a retaining member onto a bristle tuft, with over-mold portions being shaped to correspond to the nominal shape of the retaining member rather than an anchor element. In this manner, overmolding may be used to provide a mechanical interlock between the retaining member and the bristle tuft.
FIGS. 6aand6bshow a different arrangement for securing a bristle tuft using an anchor element. In this arrangement, the anchor element is in the form of asteel locking pin10 and thebristle tuft3 comprises a plurality of pairs of bristles (e.g.3aand3b), with each pair of bristles being formed by looping a bristle filament underneath the locking pin10 (the individual filaments are not shown inFIG. 5).
A retainingmember6 is welded to the support body, in similar manner to the retainingmember6 inFIGS. 2aand2b, which clamps the lockingpin10 against the supportingbody2 to trap the bristle filaments in place, thus mechanically locking thebristle tuft3 to the supporting body.
Arecess11 is cut into the supportingbody2 for accommodating the looped portion of the bristle filaments underneath the lockingpin10. Therecess11 is counter-bored in similar manner to the recess5 (seeFIGS. 2aand2b) in order to accommodate the retainingmember6. The undersurface of the retainingmember6ais in turn provided with a counter-bore6ato accommodate the lockingpin10. The lockingpin10 may bear against theshoulder11aformed by the counter bore11bin therecess11 but this is not considered essential, provided that the lockingpin10 traps the bristle filaments in place to mechanically lock the bristle tuft to the supportingbody2.
The anchor element in the arrangement shown inFIGS. 6aand6bneed not be a locking pin, specifically—other forms of anchor element may be used provided that the bristle filaments can be looped underneath the anchor element.
FIG. 7 shows an arrangement which is similar to the arrangement shown inFIGS. 6aand6b, but which does not incorporate an anchor element. Instead, a retainingmember15 incorporates two (semi-circular) holes15a,15bseparated by apartition15c.The bristle tuft comprises a plurality of pairs of bristles, with each pair of bristles being formed by looping a bristle filament underneath the partition such that the two bristles extend respectively throughholes15aand15b.
The retainingmember6 may be formed from any suitable material, including metal or plastics such as ABS, PP or an ABS-PP blend. The supportingbody2 may also be formed from metal, or plastics such as ABS, PP or an ABS-PP blend, and may be formed from the same material as the retaining member to ensure good weld integrity between the retainingmember6 and the supportingbody2. The bristle tuft is mechanically locked in place by the retaining member and thus not subject to welding constraints; consequently, the bristles themselves may be formed from a different material altogether, for example a relatively wear resistant material such as Nylon.
It is not essential that the bristle tuft is clamped in-between the retaining member and the supporting body, nor is it essential to use an anchor element.FIG. 8 shows a different arrangement, in which there is no anchor element as such and abristle tuft3 is clamped in place between opposing portions of a retainingmember12 welded to the supportingbody2.
The retainingmember12 may be welded to the supporting body using an ultra-sonic welding process. Again, the retainingmember12 and supportingbody2 may be formed from the same material, for example a metal or a plastic such as ABS, PP or an ABS-PP blend, in order to promote a strong weld between the retainingmember12 and the supportingbody2. The retainingmember12 may be seated in a recess in the supportingbody2; in the arrangement shown inFIG. 8, the retainingmember12 stands slightly proud of the outer surface of the supportingbody2, though this is not essential.
The retainingmember12 is not shaped like a washer, but instead is formed (or provided) with a blindcentral bore12a(cf. the washer-shaped retainingmember6 inFIG. 5, which comprises a central through-hole). Thebristle tuft3 is inserted within this central bore12ain the retainingmember12 and pinch-clamped in place by deforming the walls of thecentral bore12a.A suitable arrangement for deforming the walls of thecentral bore12ais shown inFIG. 9. Here, thebristle tuft3 is retained in abristle clamp13 and pinched by necking a nominal upper part of thebore12ausing apress14 to flatten the respective end of the retainingmember12. The retainingmember12 is initially formed with chamfered sides in order to ensure that the flattened end of the retainingmember12 does not extend beyond the footprint of the retainingmember12. In the case where the retainingmember12 is recessed on the supportingbody2, the angle of chamfer is set such that the flattened end of the retainingmember12 fills the mouth of the recess; this may help prevent trapping of debris between the retainingmember12 and the walls of the recess.
Thepress14 may be a hot or cold press. The use of a hot press to assist with deformation of the retainingmember12 may be particularly suitable where the retainingmember12 is formed from a plastic. Cold working of the retaining member on the other hand may be appropriate if the retaining member is formed from metal.
It is envisaged that pinch-clamping the bristle tuft may be sufficient mechanically to lock the bristle tuft to the retainingmember12 during use of thebrush bar1, allowing the use of dissimilar materials for the bristles and retainingmember12. Where it is found that the bristles are prone individually to release during use of the brush bar, an anchor element may optionally be provided at the root of the bristle tuft (below the necked portion of the retaining member12) to consolidate thebristle tuft3. The anchor element may be formed using any of the methods referred to above; for example, the bristle roots may be fused together using a hot gas method.
If pinch-clamping is not sufficient to lock the bristle tuft to the supportingbody2, then the bristle tuft may additionally be welded to the retainingmember12. For example, referring back toFIG. 8, the retainingmember12 may additionally be butt-welded to thebristle tuft3 using a sonotrode as thepress14. In the case where thebristle tuft3 is welded to the retainingmember12, the pinch clamping of thebristle tuft3 by the retainingmember12 nevertheless additionally secures thebristle tuft3 to the retainingmember12. The retention of thebristle tuft3 is thus at least partly mechanical, reducing the strength of weld required between thebristle tuft3 and the retainingmember12, and in turn relaxing the material constraints on thebristle tuft3 and retainingmember12. Consequently, it is envisaged that the retainingmember12 and bristles may be formed from different materials without unduly affecting retention of thebristle tuft3 during use of thebrush bar1. For example, the bristles may be formed from Nylon, whereas the retaining member may be formed from PA-ABS.
The present invention allows for a significant reduction in the local wall thickness of the brush bar. Assuming a typical local wall thickness of 8 mm for a stapled brush bar, preliminary tests indicate that by using the arrangement of the present invention, like-for-like performance can be maintained with a greater than 50% reduction in local wall thickness, measured from the inside surface of the supporting body to the outer surface of the retaining member. In particular, satisfactory results have been obtained using the following dimensions (refer toFIGS. 10,11 and12):
Wall thickness of supporting body2 (a): 2.0 mm
Thickness of retaining member12 (b): 2.0 mm
Diameter of retaining member12 (c): 8.5 mm
Depth of counter-bore12a(d): 1.5 mm
Diameter of retaining member6 (f): 8.5 mm
Length of locking pin10 (g): ˜6.0 mm
Diameter of locking pin (Φpin): 0.5 mm
Depth ofcollar portion6a(h): 0.5 mm
Depth of retaining member6 (i): 1.5 mm
Diameter ofcollar portion6a(l): 4.5 mm
Width of recess5 (m): 6.0 mm
The above dimensions are provided by way of example and are not intended to be limiting.