BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTIONThis invention relates to hair dryers, and more specifically, it relates to such dryers with a lower noise level, i.e. “quiet” (low noise), than conventional hair dryers.
Hand-held hair dryers are well-known in the prior art. Such devices are generally sold in various sizes, configurations, and with various features, though most are characterized by a housing with an outlet for an air stream and having an internal motor driven fan for air movement, a heater for heating the air passing through the unit and a handle for holding the dryer.
Typically the housing of such devices is constructed of metal or hard plastic, with the motor being directly supported in the housing or the handle. As a result of such configurations vibrations of the motor are transmitted to the housing creating a source noise.
Motor driven hair dryers employ typically employ axial fan systems or centrifugal fan systems, the latter being a more efficient system and is the system employed in this invention.
Further the fan blades create substantial aerodynamic noise in combination with the surrounding structures, part of which is transmitted through the rigid housing and part of which simply passes outward through the outlet of the dryer. In addition inlet openings of the hair dryer are also a source of aerodynamic noise.
When the air velocity in the region of the heater downstream of the fan system in the dryer is relatively high, it also creates supplemental noise in the dryer as the air stream passes through the resistive elements employed to heat the air stream. Thus, most commercially available hand held hair dryers, while varying somewhat from design to design, all generate very substantial noise within the audible region of the human ear, typically on the order of 70 db or higher at a test point of 18 inches from the hair dryer.
While the noise signatures of various hair dryers vary, most tend to emit substantial noise which may resonate with the fan blade passing speed (motor speed times the number of fan blades) and harmonics thereof, along with other noise. Professional hair dryers used in salons have superior construction, but still emit undesirable high noise levels.
High noise levels of prior art hand held hair dryers is undesirable in that it drowns out other sounds, normally making it impossible to carry on a conversation with others, to listen to a radio or TV, to hear the doorbell or telephone ring, etc. when these dryers are in use. In salons the operator cannot talk to the customer and operators being subject to the noise levels of conventional hair dryers for extended periods may suffer health problems.
Noise levels of hair dryers have been of concern for some time and been addressed in the prior art. For example see U.S. Pat. No. 4,795,319 issued to Popovich, et al, for “Quiet Hair Dryer” and U.S. Pat. No. 4,596,921 issued to Hersh et al for “Low Noise Hand Held Hair Dryer” noting that maintaining high volume air flow in such dryers, along with lower noise levels, is a difficult parameter to achieve. Popovich, et al, uses an open cell foam rotor (fan) to reduce the noise level and Hersh et al uses sound absorbing materials (mufflers) inside the dryer to reduce the noise levels. Both of these patents use a muffling effect obtained with sound absorbing materials. U.S. Pat. No. 3,418,452 issued to Garbner employs a sleeve thermal insulation inside the dryer and between the mounting brackets of the motor to dampen mechanical vibrations from the motor to the housing. In U.S. Pat. No. 3,261,107 issued to Ponczek et al “dampening” rings around the motor casing are used to reduce the transmission of its vibrations to the housing of the dryer, but the motor is rigidly coupled to the shroud by the use of metal vanes and a metal motor bracket, allowing motor's vibrations to be directly transmitted to the housing. Because the spacing between the shroud and outer shell halves is quite small the rotating vanes will create a vortex with increased upstream airborne noise from the resulting turbulence.
Thus, the conventional, prior art handheld hair dryers, which employ motor driven fans, are so noisy, they are disturbing to users and or customers alike even when employing the forgoing techniques to quite them. Further other patents have located the motor driving the fan remote from the fan rotor itself in both centrifugal fan assemblies and axial fan assemblies in hair dryers, see for example U.S. Pat. No. 5,875,562 issued to Forgerty which has the motor buried in the handle remote from the fan rotor.
An object of the current invention is to provide a handheld hair dryer which has reduced noise levels, by a specially designed fan or blower system.
Another object of the novel unit is to reduce operational noise of a hair dryer without sacrificing performance.
It is also an object to suppress the noise arising from air turbulence by using a diffuser ring in the outlet of the novel hair dryer.
Still other objects and advantages will be noted in the description of and drawings for this novel hair dryer.
SUMMARY OF INVENTIONThe above objects and others are accomplished by quiet handheld hair dryer having a handle means for holding the dryer, a hollow blower assembly with top and bottom inlet bezel means mounted on the top of the handle, with the top and bottom bezel means each having equal open diameters for balanced air inflow into said blower assembly with the blower assembly having an internal a torus shaped chamber designed for housing a centrifugal fan, a squirrel cage fan rotor having a plurality of blades mounted in the torus shaped chamber, each of said blades of said fan rotor having an air foil configuration, an electric motor means mounted inside of the squirrel cage fan rotor with its armature connected in driving relationship with said fan rotor to rotate it, the electric motor means having its base supported through one of said bezel means so that the fan rotor is adjacent to both of said inlet bezel means, a tubular throat means connected to the outlet of said blower assembly having an outlet for the air flow exiting the blower assembly, and control means connected to the motor means with switch means operable to control the power to the electrical motor means when connected to a source of power.
The throat means has an increasing internal diameter from its connection to the blower assembly to its outlet to decrease the pressure of the air exiting the blower assembly. Further the throat means can be connected to the diffuser tube having a diffuser ring therein to increase the velocity of the air flow passing through the diffuser tube.
These and other objects and advantages of the invention, as well as the details of an illustrative embodiment, will be more fully understood from the following specification and drawings.
DRAWING DESCRIPTIONFIG. 1 is an exploded perspective of the novel hair dryer illustrating its major components;
FIG. 2 is an exploded perspective of the blower assembly of the novel hair dryer;
FIG. 3 is a perspective of the fan rotor of the novel hair dryer;
FIG. 4 is a top view of the fan rotor of the novel hair dryer illustrated inFIG. 3;
FIG. 5. is an edge elevation of the fan rotor of the novel hair dryer illustrated inFIG. 3;
FIG. 6 is bottom view of the fan rotor of the novel hair dryer illustrated inFIG. 3;
FIG. 7 is an elevation of the blower assembly, throat and diffuser tube of the novel hair dryer; and
FIG. 8 is a cross section of the blower assembly along lines8-8 ofFIG. 7.
DESCRIPTION OF AN EMBODIMENTInFIG. 1, the major components of thequiet hair dryer20, according this invention, are illustrated. A majority of its parts can be constructed of plastic or pressed metal. It has ahandle assembly21 consisting of aleft shell22 and aright shell23 that inter lock to create a pistol like cradle for the blower (fan)assembly24, shown inFIG. 2. This handle also includes recesses for the electrical switches and the electrical cord attachment (the switches and cord are not shown). The handle is designed so as not to impede balanced air flow into the blower assembly from both itstop unit25 andbottom unit26, as discussed herein. It is important that the inflow of air to the blower assembly be balance from the top and from the bottom of the fan to eliminate aerodynamic noise which would, other wise, be generated from discordant air flows entering the blower assembly.
More particularly, the blower assembly24 (refer toFIG. 2) is composed of the cuppedtop unit25 and cuppedbottom unit26 that form two halves of the clam shell enclosure for this assembly. Both units have an air in flow bezel, bezel30 in the top unit and bezel31 in the bottom unit. The diameter of the opening in each bezel is approximately 60 mm and the open area of each is approximately 2825 sq. mm for a total opening of 5650 sq. mm in the two bezels. These openings of the bezels are designed to have essentially equal cross sectional open areas for balanced air inflow into the blower assembly. As indicated above the pistol like handle is designed so as not to impede the air flow into thebezel31 of the bottom unit when theblower assembly24 is assembled therewith. Moreover the top and bottom units, when assembled, create astandard involute chamber32 for a centrifugal fan rotor.
Referring to thecupped bottom unit26, it has extendingtubular pillars35 on theinternal spokes36 of its bezel for supporting theelectric motor37 of thefan assembly24. The motor is retained in asleeve38 that encases the motor and has feet39 that engage the tops of pillars, which feet are affixed to the tops of the pillars with screws of the like. Between the motor and the sleeve is an elastomer layer (not shown), continuous or discontinuous, which isolates vibrations of the motor from its sleeve. Also an elastomer layer or pad (not shown) is placed between the base40 of the motor where is rests oncenter button41 of thebezel31 to which thespokes36 connect. So encased, the motor is securely retained in the bottom unit and only limited vibrations of the motor, and its fan rotor, are transmitted to the blower assembly as a whole. With balanced inflow of air and the isolation of the motor on elastomer buffers (layers), the design reduces noises that would otherwise be generated in its blower assembly.
Mounted on thearmature50 ofmotor37 is thecentrifugal fan rotor43 which is designed to compromise aerodynamic noises when operating. The fan rotor itself, is best shown inFIGS. 3,4,5, and6, has a squirrel cage design. It is formed with aspindle51 that has radially extendingspokes52 connecting it to anassembly ring53. The spindle mounts onarmature50 and is rotated by the motor. Typically the motor will be a 5300 rpm motor at high speed and, at low speed, turns at 3800 rpm; however, other rotational speed motors are available in off the shelf AC induction motors. Further multi-speed motors can be employed with the appropriate switch assemblies.
Theassembly ring53 provides the mounting member for theblades54 of the fan rotor. The structure is unique in that the blades are notched so they slide onto the assembly ring (or formed integrally with the ring such as by injection molding) but have no other attachment to the spindle. Acentral washer ring55, received in central notches midpoint in the individual blades, to stabilize the blades in this fan rotor which has a minimum physical structure associated with the blades to limit noise when in operation. In addition the blades themselves have an airfoil cross section to take advantage of the Coanda effect (see the blade edge profile inFIG. 4). Coanda effect is the result of a gas flowing over a convex airfoil type (surface), wherein the gas is drawn down to adhere to the airfoil by a combination of the greater pressure above the gas flow and the lower pressure below the flow caused by an evacuating effect of the flow itself resulting an increase in gas velocity. By keeping the surface of the airfoil blades relatively clean (devoid of structure), as is accomplished by the novel structure of the fan rotor, less turbulence occurs about the blades, with an accompanying reduced noise level.
In addition the trailingedges56 of theblades54 have a curved periphery. This is important because a broadband noise source in centrifugal fans is generated by air separation from the blade's trailing edge which is partially controlled by curved trailing edge of each blade of the instant invention. In general the leading edge of each blade of this rotor begins straight (extending radially from the center of the spindle) and curves to “lean” 65 degrees relative to its radial beginning, see edge view of the blades inFIGS. 4 and 6. As to the curved tailing edges56 of the blades, if the diameter of the fan unit is about 83 mm the trailing edge of each blade is defined by a circle with a radius of approximately 40 mm. In such a fan rotor, the width is approximately 42 mm with 30 blades. Typically these relationships or similar ratios should be maintained in the fan rotor. As these curved trailing edges of the blades pass the cut off location there is less of an impulse generated and less broadband noise generated.
The over all design of the fan rotor contributes to the significant aerodynamic noise reduction in the unit.
The torus shapedinvolute chamber32 of theblower assembly24 is of a conventional (the axial clearance increases directly in proportion to the angle traversed) design and to accommodate the size of the fan rotor.
Typically this chamber design does not increase air velocity at any stage, or across a part of the cross-section of the chamber, as velocity increases in the flow here brings an overall increase aerodynamic noise generation. The cutoff clearance is critical (the minimum space between thefan rotor43 and chamber32) at opening60 (is 970 sq. mm seeFIGS. 8 and 9) of the torus. In general, the smaller the clearance, the greater the rotational noise that is generated at the cutoff location by the blades of the rotor. A clearance of 5 to 10 percent of the fan rotor's diameter is generally considered to be the optimum spacing; a lesser clearance increases the rotational noise while a larger clearance decreases the aerodynamic efficiency. This clearance should be, in the case of a fan rotor with a diameter of 83 mm, approximately 4 to 9 mm.
The outlet of thechamber32, has an inner diameter of approximate 32 mm (oval in configuration with an area of 970 sq. mm) and connects to atubular throat61 of the novel dryer which is formed of two, elongated semicircular parts,61aand61b,shown inFIG. 2. From its connection to the outlet ofchamber32 the internal diameter of the throat gradually increases to a diameter of 44 mm (1517 sq. mm) at itsoutlet62. Because of this construction the pressure of the air out put of theblower assembly24 entering the throat decreases and its velocity increases with an accompanying decrease in noise.
Connected to theoutlet62 of thethroat61 is adiffuser tube70 which is circular tube of a short length with aninlet71 and anoutlet72. Its inlet is connected to theoutlet62 of the throat. Within the outlet of the diffuser tube, having an internal diameter of 44 mm, aring73, having a circular cross section, is mounted. The outer diameter of the ring approximates the inner diameter of the diffuser tube so that it seals around its contact with the diffuser tube. The ring's inner diameter is approximately 39 mm and, because of the curved outer surface or the ring, it also employs the Coanda effect to increase velocity of the air exiting the dryer with an accompanying decrease in noise, similar to a diffuser used in air conditioners. The cross section diameter of the ring is about 5 mm.
Also mounted in theoutlet72 of thediffuser tube70 is a circular disk guard74, which is perforated to allow for exiting air, but prevents individuals from inserting their fingers, or other objects, into diffuser tube and throat of thedryer20. The guard mounted in the outlet prior to the attachment of thering73 in the outlet.
InFIG. 7, the blower assembly of thenovel hair dryer20 is shown in elevation, with its handle broken away, from which it can be appreciated that thehandle21 cradles thebower assembly24, which blower assembly feeds pressured air to thethroat61 and that connects to thediffuser tube70 that includes the outlet for the dryer. Further the relationship of the parts can be seen in the section illustrated inFIG. 8.
When dryers tests were conducted having the forgoing features, the following data were collected. Average results of 8 tests (by different people):
|
| Air speed in MPH | Exit Noise in dB A | Intake Noise in dB B |
|
| 24.1 | 62.35 | 62.89 |
|
The air stream was measured in MPH at the exit at the same time the noise levels were tested in dB at A, the outlet, and in dB at B, the inlet of the hair dryer.
Comparative hair dryers were also tested and the sound levels recorded.
The tests were made with commercial available hair dryers by comparing the fan size and the outlet diameter of these units. Dryer Q is the one constructed according to this invention. (next page)
|
| | Front LOW | | Rear LOW |
| Front HI dB | dB | Rear HI dB | dB |
|
| Dryer A | 81.5 | 72 | 82.5 | 73 |
| Dryer B | 76 | 69 | 77 | 71 |
| Dryer C | 77 | 66.5 | 74 | 67.5 |
| Dryer E | 78 | 71.5 | 79 | 72 |
| Dryer F | 81 | 73 | 83 | 75.5 |
| Dryer G | 77.5 | 72 | 79.5 | 76 |
| Dryer H | 81 | 72 | 79.5 | 71 |
| Dryer Q* | 71 | 63 | 70 | 63 |
| Average | 78.9 | 70.9 | 79.2 | 72.3 |
| Delta Avg | −7.9 | −7.9 | −9.2 | −9.3 |
| Median | 78 | 72 | 79.5 | 72 |
| Delta | −7 | −9 | −9.5 | −9 |
| Median |
| Max | 81.5 | 73 | 83 | 76 |
| Delta Max | −10.5 | −10 | −13 | −13 |
| Min | 76 | 66.5 | 74 | 67.5 |
| Delta Min | −5 | −3.5 | −4 | −4.5 |
|
| | | Fan dia | Outlet |
| | Configuration | mm | dia mm |
| |
| Dryer A | turbo | 65.0 | 46.20 |
| Dryer B | horizontal | 66.5 | 45.70 |
| | pistol |
| Dryer C | turbo | 60.0 | 38.20 |
| Dryer E | turbo | 60.8 | 36.90 |
| Dryer F | turbo | 66.0 | 42.20 |
| Dryer G | turbo | 66.0 | 41.40 |
| Dryer H | AC turbo | 60.0 | 36.77 |
| Dryer Q | horizontal | 70.0 | 38.90 |
| | pistol |
| |
| *Hair dryer constructed according to the teachings of this invention. |
Using these data it is useful to understand how changes in dB relate to the loudness perceived by individuals. In this regard the effect of dB changes in perceived loudness are:
3 dB Just noticeable
5 dB Clearly noticeable
10 dB Twice (or half) as loud
With the novel dryer the empirical data show a −10 dB decrease in the level of loudness of the noise when compared to other hair dryers tested.
Thehair dryer20 in itsthroat61 will included internal resistive elements (not shown), typical wire coils, which heat when an electric current is applied. Further it has an electric cord (not shown) for connecting the dryer to an outlet. Both these elements are within the competency of those skill in the art and need not be described, along with the switches that control the dryer motor37 (On-Off—or selected speeds) and the resistive elements (On-Off—or low or high).
Also the novel hair dryer can include filters and ornamental features which enhance its appeal but which do not contribute to the decrease in noise levels.