US20090299164A1 - Implantation of implantable medical device - Google Patents

Abstract

In general, the invention is directed to strategies pertaining to implantation of an implantable medical device between a scalp and a skull of the patient. The invention pertains to collection of data such as data pertaining to the skull of the patient, the scalp of the patient, the vascular structure or neurological structures in the head of the patient, and the like. The data may be in the form of images, such as images generated by X-ray, magnetic resonance imaging, CT-scan and fluoroscopy. A surgeon can use the collected data to determine, for example, whether the patient is a candidate for a cranial implantation, whether the patient's skull and scalp can support the implantation, what configuration of device should be implanted, where the device should be implanted, and how the surgical incisions should be made.

Description

• This application is a divisional of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/835,527, filed Apr. 29, 2004, the entire content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
TECHNICAL FIELD
• The invention relates to implantation and removal of medical devices, and more particularly, to implantable medical devices that deliver therapy to and/or monitor a patient.
BACKGROUND
• Implantable medical devices (IMDs) include devices implantable in a mammalian body that sense medical parameters, monitor medical conditions, administer therapy, or any combination thereof. Typical IMDs include a variety of electrical and/or mechanical components, often including a housing that houses the components. Because the components may be fragile, the housing is usually sufficiently robust to protect the components from forces to which they would otherwise be exposed when implanted within the body. Housings may be constructed from titanium, for example. In order to avoid potentially harmful interactions between the components and bodily fluids, such as corrosion, IMD housings are typically hermetically sealed.
• Large components common to most IMDs typically include a battery, a coil, and a hybrid circuit that includes digital circuits, e.g., integrated circuit chips and/or a microprocessor, and analog circuit components. IMDs may include other components as well. The components and the housing each add bulk to the IMD.
• Some medical devices may be implanted in the head of a patient. For example, an IMD may be implanted under the scalp and on top of the cranium, with one or more leads deployed on the head or implanted in the brain. In many cases, the implantation is not permanent, and it may be advantageous to remove the device for reasons such as repair, maintenance, replacement, or because the patient no longer benefits from the device.
SUMMARY
• In general, the invention is directed to techniques for planning and carrying out implantation of an IMD under the scalp of a patient and on top of the patient's skull. Implantation of a cranially implanted IMD includes making an incision in the scalp of a head of a patient to obtain access to the implantation site and implanting the IMD.
• The invention addresses strategies that make implantation more efficient and improve the chances of success. Generally speaking, data are collected prior to surgery that assist the surgeon in planning and executing the surgery. The collected data can pertain to the contours of the skull of the patient, the condition of the scalp of the patient, the vascular structure or neurological structures in the head of the patient, and the like. The data may be in the form of images, such as images generated by X-ray, magnetic resonance imaging, CT-scan and fluoroscopy. The data can also be in the form of physical or virtual models of the patient's skull and the IMD.
• A surgeon can use the collected data to determine, for example, whether the patient is a candidate for a cranial implantation, and whether the patient's skull and scalp can support the implantation. The surgeon can also determine where the device should be implanted, and how the surgical incisions should be made.
• In addition, the surgeon can use the data to determine what configuration of device should be implanted. The IMDs can incorporate a modular design, and the modules may be arranged in a plurality of standard configurations. In other words, IMDs need not be built from scratch for every patient. Rather, the surgeon can select a suitable standard configuration and adapt that configuration to the patient by bending, trimming or otherwise adjusting the IMD to fit the patient. Use of one or more standard configurations is generally more efficient, convenient and economical than building custom IMDs from scratch for each patient.
• In one embodiment, the invention is directed to a method comprising receiving an image of a head of a patient and determining, as a function of the image, whether the patient is a candidate for implantation of an implantable medical device between a scalp and a skull. The IMD includes at least one module that includes control electronics within a housing, and is configured to be implanted between the scalp and the skull of the patient. The IMD may also have member that at least partially encapsulates the housing. The method may further include determining whether the patient is a candidate for implantation of the IMD deployed in a recess created in the skull.
• In another embodiment, the invention is directed to a method that includes receiving an image of a head of a patient, generating a model of the patient's skull as a function of the image, and providing an implantable medical device configured to be implanted between a scalp and the skull of the patient as a function of the model of the skull. The model of the skull may be a physical model or a virtual model simulated in a computer.
• In a further embodiment, the invention presents a method comprising receiving an image of a head of a patient and selecting, from a plurality of configurations of an implantable medical device configured to be implanted between a scalp and a skull, a configuration of the implantable medical device as a function of the image.
• In an additional embodiment, the invention is directed to a method that includes receiving an image of a scalp of a patient. The method also includes determining, as a function of the image, whether the patient is a candidate for implantation of an implantable medical device between the scalp and a skull. The method can include conditioning the scalp for implantation of the IMD.
• In another embodiment, the invention is directed to a method comprising receiving skull contour data associated with the skull of a patient, and selecting, as a function of the skull contour data, an implantation site for an implantable medical device.
• In an added embodiment, the invention is directed to a method that includes receiving a soft-tissue image of a head of a patient, identifying physiological structures in the image, and selecting an incision site as a function of the physiological structures.
• In additional embodiments, the invention is directed to methods that include receiving an image of a head of a patient, the image comprising a soft-tissue image and a hard-tissue image, of a head of a patient. In one embodiment, the invention includes receiving an implantation criterion and proposing at least one implantation site for an implantable medical device as a function of the image and the implantation criterion. In another embodiment, the invention includes receiving an implantation site for an implantable medical device, and disclosing to a user information about at least one feature of the head at the implantation site.
• The details of one or more embodiments of the invention are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
• FIG. 1 is a conceptual diagram illustrating deployment of a low-profile IMD under the scalp of a patient.
• FIG. 2 is a plan diagram of the top of a head of a patient, illustrating an exemplary implantation of a low-profile IMD.
• FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional diagram of an implantable conditioning device implanted between the scalp and skull of a patient, and illustrating a technique for adding fluid to the implantable conditioning device.
• FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional diagram of the implantable conditioning device shown inFIG. 4, following the addition of fluid.
• FIG. 5 is a plan diagram of the top of a head of a patient, illustrating an exemplary implantation of a low-profile IMD in a trough.
• FIG. 6 is a flow diagram illustrating a technique for identifying potential locations and implantation strategies for an implanted low-profile IMD.
• FIG. 7 is a conceptual diagram illustrating use of image data to develop physical or virtual models.
• FIG. 8 is a flow diagram further showing the use of image data to develop physical or virtual models, and constructing an IMD based on the models.
• FIG. 9 is a flow diagram illustrating the use of image data to select an IMD for implantation in a patient.
• FIG. 10 is a flow diagram illustrating selection of an implantation site for an IMD based upon image data showing the patient's scalp.
• FIG. 11 is a flow diagram showing selection of an implantation site for an IMD as a function of skull contour data.
• FIG. 12 is a flow diagram illustrating techniques for selection of an implantation site and an implantation strategy based on soft-tissue image data.
• FIG. 13 is a flow diagram illustrating applying the techniques of the invention with an imaging system that uses hard- and soft-tissue image data.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
• FIG. 1 shows apatient10 with a low-profile IMD12 deployed beneath hisscalp14. InFIG. 1, IMD12 is a neurostimulator that provides deep brain stimulation vialeads16A,16B deployed in the brain ofpatient10. In the example ofFIG. 1,IMD12 is deployed in proximity to site of stimulation therapy.IMD12 may be used to treat any nervous system disorder including, but not limited to, epilepsy, pain, psychological disorders including mood and anxiety disorders, movement disorders (MVD) such as, but not limited to, essential tremor and Parkinson's disease and neurodegenerative disorders.
• AlthoughIMD12 is depicted as a neurostimulator, the invention is not limited to applications in which the IMD is a neurostimulator. The invention may be employed with IMDs that perform any monitoring or therapeutic functions. The invention is not limited to IMDs that include leads deployed in the brain, but may also be employed with leads deployed anywhere in the head or neck including, for example, leads deployed on or near the surface of the skull, leads deployed beneath the skull such as near or on the dura mater, leads placed adjacent cranial or other nerves in the neck or head, or leads placed directly on the surface of the brain. Nor is the invention limited to IMDs that are coupled to electrodes. The invention may be employed with low-profile IMDs coupled to any sensing or therapeutic elements, such as temperature sensors or motion sensors. The invention may also be employed with different types of IMDs including, but not limited to, IMDs operating in an open loop mode (also referred to as non-responsive operation), IMDs operating in a closed loop mode (also referred to as responsive), and IMDs for providing monitoring and/or warning.
• In the example ofFIG. 1,IMD12 is deployed beneathscalp14 ofpatient10, but on top of the cranium ofpatient10. The invention may be applied to other types of implantation as well, such as implantation ofIMD12 in a trough cut into the cranium ofpatient10.
• FIG. 2 illustrates a typical implantation ofIMD12 shown inFIG. 1. In a typical implantation, the surgeon makes anincision18 through thescalp14 ofpatient10, and pulls back the resulting flap ofskin20 to expose the desired area of thecranium22. The incision may be a “C-flap” incision, for example.Patient10 may be under local anesthetic. The surgeon drills holes, called “burr holes,” in the cranium and deploys leads16 through the burr holes into the brain.
• The surgeon typically placescaps24A and24B, called “burr hole caps,” over the burr holes. A portion of the bodies ofleads16A and16B, identified withreference numerals26A and26B, is deployed outside of the brain on the surface ofskull22. Before connecting leads26A and26B toIMD12, the surgeon typically “manages” the leads. Lead management includes arranging the excess length of leads16 using techniques such as coiling and anchoring with anchoring plates. In a typical implantation, the surgeon arranges the leads to provide some slack to reduce the risk of lead migration. InFIG. 2, leads26A and26B are depicted as coiled, and are anchored by anchoringplates28A and28B.
• Thesurgeon implants IMD12 betweenscalp14 andskull22. In one surgical procedure, the surgeon uses a tool to form a pocket beneathscalp14 proximate to the burr holes, andpositions IMD12 in the pocket. The surgeon may fixIMD12 to the cranium using an attachment mechanism such as bone screws. The surgeon closesskin flap20 overIMD12, and then staples or sutures the incision.
• InFIG. 2,IMD12 is a low-profile device, allowing it to be implanted betweenscalp14 andskull22, with little discomfort or adverse cosmetic consequences topatient10. A low-profile IMD also typically lacks high protrusions with sharp corners that could cause skin erosion.IMD12 comprises one or more modules that carry out the various functions ofIMD12. As shown inFIG. 2,IMD12 includes at least three modules: acontrol module30, apower supply module32 and arecharge module34. One or more ofmodules30,32,34 includes a housing that can carry out a variety of functions, including encasing the components of the modules, sealing the modules against contamination, electrically isolating electrical components, and the like. The modules are coupled to amember36, which may be made of a soft, biocompatible material.Member36 at least partially encapsulates one or more housings ofmodules30,32,34, and generally serves as a smooth interface between the modules and the body tissue.Leads26A and26B are coupled toIMD12 atlead connectors38A and38B.IMD12 may be anchored with an anchoring mechanism such as ametallic tab40 that includes an opening for receiving a bone screw.
• In general,member36 integratesmodules30,32 and34 into a desired form factor, but, where flexible, allows relative intermodule motion. In some embodiments,member36 incorporates mechanical features to restrict intermodule motion to certain directions or within certain ranges.Member36 may be made from silicone, and is some embodiments may be made from two or more materials of differing flexibility, such as silicone and a polyurethane. An exemplary polyurethane for this purpose is Tecothane®, which is commercially available from Hermedics Polymer Products, Wilmington, Mass.Member36 may also be referred to as an “overmold,” but use of the term “overmold” herein is not intended to limit the invention to embodiments in whichmember36 is a molded structure.Member36 may be a molded structure, or may be a structure formed by any process.
• The invention is not limited to the particular IMD depicted inFIG. 2, but includes a number of embodiments, some of which are described in more detail below.
• FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of the top of the head of a patient, and illustrates an embodiment of the invention. In some cases,scalp14 may not be sufficiently elastic to close overIMD12.Patient10 may benefit from having the scalp stretched or conditioned prior to implantation ofIMD12. Stretching of the scalp can contribute to patient comfort, for example, as well as easier closure of the incision following implantation, along with attendant benefits such as a reduced risk of infection. Implantation of adummy IMD50 prior to implantation of workingIMD12 can help conditionscalp14.
• A surgeon may implantdummy IMD50 in a manner similar to implantation of a working IMD. For example, the surgeon may make a C-flap incision as shown inFIG. 2, and pull back the scalp flap to expose the skull. The surgeon may further separate a part of the scalp from the skull to create a pocket, and place at least a portion ofdummy IMD50 in the pocket. The surgeon covers at least a portion ofdummy IMD50 with the scalp flap and sutures the scalp flap to close the incision.
• As illustrated inFIG. 3,dummy IMD50 need not provide sensing or therapy. Rather,dummy IMD50 is a device that is comparable in dimension to working IMD12 (not shown inFIG. 3). InFIG. 3,dummy IMD50 is implanted betweenscalp14 andcranium22, and covers about as much surface area ofcranium22 as would be covered by workingIMD12. In one embodiment,dummy IMD50 is at the time of implantation thinner than workingIMD12. The thinness ofdummy IMD50 enables the surgeon to close the incision inscalp14 more easily.
• Dummy IMD50 may be formed from any number of biocompatible materials. In a typical embodiment,dummy IMD50 is formed from a soft, pliable and fluid-tight polymer such as silicone.
• In the embodiment of the invention shown inFIG. 3,dummy IMD50 does not have a fixed volume. Rather,dummy IMD50 comprises an inflatable interior, such as a sac or pouch that can be expanded. The sac may comprise, for example, a self-sealing silicone envelope that can be increasingly filled with a fluid such as saline by injection through the scalp.FIG. 3 depicts an expansion technique, in which ahypodermic needle52 injects fluid into the interior ofdummy IMD50.
• FIG. 4 showsdummy IMD50 with an expanded volume. InFIG. 4, the volume or profile ofdummy IMD50 may be comparable to the volume or profile of workingIMD12. Increased quantities of fluid may have been injected intodummy IMD50 over time, causingscalp14 to stretch gradually. The time for scalp conditioning may vary from patient to patient, but stretching may take place over about two weeks, in a typical patient. Gradual stretching ofscalp14 withexpandable dummy IMD50 may effectively pre-conditionscalp14 for the implantation of workingIMD12.
• FIG. 5 is a conceptual imaging diagram of the top of a head of a patient, with the scalp being invisible for clarity.FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary implantation technique. InFIG. 5, theIMD12A is a modular implantable device with a soft, biocompatible member, similar toIMD12. UnlikeIMD12, the modules ofIMD12A are deployed in a linear rather than a triangular configuration.
• InFIG. 5, the surgeon has madeincision18 and has deployed leads26A and26B. The surgeon has also prepared a pocket between the scalp and the skull for deployment ofIMD12A. Prior to deployment ofIMD12A, however, the surgeon created a trough orrecess60 in the skull to receive theIMD12A. Whenrecess60 receivesIMD12A, and the scalp is closed,IMD12A is implanted between the scalp and the skull. By deployingIMD12A insiderecess60,IMD12A can have an external appearance of a smaller profile. In other words,IMD12A may be result in less bulging on the patient's head. The low profile can have cosmetic benefit, and can also be advantageous to patients that have less elastic scalps.
• InFIG. 5, thesurgeon gouges recess60 posterior to thecoronal suture62, and proximate to thesagittal suture64 ofskull22. Such recess positioning and IMD deployment are for purposes of illustration, and the invention supports other recess positions or IMDs.
• FIG. 6 is a flow diagram illustrating a technique for identifying potential locations and implantation strategies for an implanted low-profile IMD. Before implanting the implanted device, the surgeon should ordinarily make a determination about what site is appropriate for the patient. Accordingly, the surgeon may direct that the patient be imaged using one or more medical imaging techniques such as X-ray, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), CT-scan or fluoroscopy. The surgeon receives the images of the head (70) and identifies potential locations for an implanted low-profile IMD based upon the images.
• Before making a cranial implantation with a recess, such asrecess60 depicted inFIG. 5, the surgeon determines whether the patient is a candidate for a cranial implantation, i.e., whether the patient's cranium is suitable for such an implantation. The surgeon considers criteria such as skull curvature, skull thickness, scalp thickness, location of vascular and neurological structures, potential incision locations, and the like. If the patient has a normal skull and scalp, and has no irregularities that would be expected to impede implantation without a recess, then the surgeon can explore cranial implantation without a recess (72) and can plan the implantation accordingly (74). In planning the implantation, the surgeon generally refers to the images to identify implant sites. Thereafter, the surgeon implants the IMD (76).
• In some cases, the patient may be a candidate for a cranial implantation with a recess, and the surgeon considers whether a cranial implantation with a recess is indicated (78). When a cranial implantation with a recess is feasible, the surgeon plans the operation based on the images (80) before commencing the operation (82). In some procedures, the recess may be formed by a computer-controlled device that forms the recess in the cranium.
• In some cases, the surgeon refers to the images and determines that the patient is not a candidate for cranial implantation. In such cases, the surgeon plans an implantation at another site (84), such as the neck or trunk of the patient, before commencing the operation (86).
• FIG. 7 is a conceptual diagram showing techniques for planning the implantation of an IMD between a scalp and a skull of a patient, based upon images from one or more of the medical imaging techniques mentioned above. One or more pieces ofimaging equipment90 take images of the skull of the patient, resulting in image data. In one embodiment of the invention, a physical model of the patient'sskull92 is constructed with the image data.Physical skull model92 is a representation of the patient's skull. Aphysical IMD94 can then be tailored to conform tophysical model92.Physical IMD94 may be the actual IMD to be implanted in the patient. By adjustingIMD94 to fit the model representation of the patient's skull prior to surgery, the actual working IMD can be adjusted to fit the patient's actual skull, reducing the time needed for IMD adjustment during surgery.
• In another embodiment of the invention, the image data are supplied to acomputer system96, which generates a virtual model of the patient'sskull98 and avirtual IMD100.Virtual IMD100 can be selected from a plurality of virtual IMD configurations, and virtual modeling supports simulating implantation of several virtual IMD configurations.Virtual IMD100 can then be tailored to conform tovirtual skull98. Oncevirtual IMD100 is tailored tovirtual skull98, the dimensions ofvirtual IMD100 can be used to construct an actual IMD.
• FIG. 8 is a flow diagram that summarizes the techniques depicted inFIG. 7. Upon receiving one or more images of the head of a patient (110), a model-maker generates a three-dimensional model of the cranium based on the images (112). The model can be a physical model or a virtual model. Thereafter, a physical or virtual three-dimensional IMD can be created to fit the model of the cranium (114), and a working IMD can be constructed, adapted or otherwise provided, according to the three-dimensional IMD and the model of the cranium (116). When the three-dimensional model of the cranium is a physical model, the actual IMD selected for implantation can be modified to fit the physical model of the skull. In the case of a virtual IMD, the physical IMD is provided as a function of the virtual IMD.
• In some cases, providing the IMD comprises making adjustments to a standard IMD or to one of a set of standard IMDs to meet the needs to the patient. In other cases, providing the IMD comprises constructing a customized IMD for the patient.
• Employment of modeling techniques prior to surgery can result in many advantages for the patient. Modeling can help the surgeon select an implantation site, and can help the surgeon select a recess location, if suitable. Modeling can further help the surgeon select a configuration of modules. A triangular configuration of modules, such as depicted inFIG. 2, may be appropriate for one patient's skull, while a linear configuration, such as depicted inFIG. 5, may be appropriate for another patient's skull.
• An advantage of modular IMDs such as those depicted inFIGS. 2 and 5 is that a standard configuration of an IMD can be adapted to a patient, without having to build the IMD from scratch and without having to customize every component of the IMD. The surgeon may select any from several standard configurations of standard modules. Accordingly, construction of the IMD (116) can comprise making adjustments to a standard IMD so that the IMD will better fit the patient. Adjusting the IMD can include bending the IMD, positioning the modules of the IMD, trimming the IMD, and the like.
• FIG. 9 is a flow diagram illustrating the use of image data of the head of a patient to select an IMD configuration. Upon receiving image data (120), the surgeon determines whether the patient can use a standard module configuration, or whether the patient would benefit from a fully customized IMD (122). The surgeon uses the image data, which may be incorporated into physical or virtual models of the cranium, to determine whether one or more standard configurations are suitable for the patient. The image data can include information pertaining to criteria such as skull curvature, skull thickness, scalp thickness, location of vascular and neurological structures, potential incision locations, and the like. The surgeon may select a configuration (124) and may adjust the IMD to the cranium of the particular patient (126).
• It is generally more efficient, convenient and economical to employ a standard configuration of IMD that is adjusted to the patient, than to build an IMD from scratch that is fully customized for the patient. Thus, it can be advantageous for the surgeon to select a particular IMD from a plurality of standard IMD configurations. In the event the surgeon determines that the patient cannot benefit from a standard module configuration, however, the surgeon may direct the creation of a customized IMD (128).
• FIG. 10 is a flow diagram illustrating the use of image data showing the scalp to select an implantation site for an IMD. A cranial implantation may be desirable, but soft-tissue imaging may indicate that the patient's scalp would be unable to support an implantation of an IMD between the scalp and the skull. Soft-tissue imaging can include magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasound imaging, for example.
• Accordingly, upon receiving one or more soft-tissue images of the head (130), the surgeon may determine whether the patient's scalp can support a cranial implantation (132), and if so, the surgeon plans a cranial implantation (134). Preparation for cranial implantation (138) may optionally include scalp conditioning (136), such as implantation and expansion of a dummy IMD as depicted inFIGS. 2 and 3. When the patient's scalp cannot support a cranial implantation, the surgeon may plan and carry out implantation at another site (140,142).
• FIG. 11 is a flow diagram illustrating the use of skull contour data to select an implantation site for an IMD. Skull contour data is any data associated with the contour of the patient's skull, and includes, but is not limited to, data obtained from imaging. Skull contour data can also be obtained from gross examination and measurement of the head of the patient. After receiving skull contour data (150), the surgeon selects an implantation site (152). The surgeon can further provide an IMD as a function of the skull contour data (154). Providing the IMD includes, but is not limited to, constructing an IMD and adapting a standard configuration of an IMD to the contours of the patient's skull.
• FIG. 12 is a flow diagram illustrating the use of soft-tissue image data to select an implantation site for an IMD and an implantation strategy. In some cases, implantation may involve circumstances in which implantation of an IMD between the scalp and the skull may affect physiological structures such as blood vessels or nerves. Although a C-flap incision, such asincision18 shown inFIG. 2, may have generally predictable vascular and neurological effects, circumstances can arise in which an unconventional incision may be in order. When selecting an incision site, the surgeon ordinarily takes into consideration not only the desired site of implantation, but also potential bleeding and nerve damage that could result from the incision to achieve the implantation.
• Accordingly, the surgeon may receive one or more soft-tissue images (160) that include physiological structures such as vascular and neurological structures (162). Using this image data, the surgeon can plan the site of the cranial implantation (164) and can develop an incision strategy (166) to bring about the implantation (168).
• FIG. 13 is a flow diagram illustrating use of hard- and soft-tissue image data to select an implantation site. An imaging system, such as the FrameLink Stereotactic Linking System, produced by and commercially available from Medtronic Surgical Navigation Technologies, can combine hard- and soft-tissue image data to generate a three-dimensional model of an imaged body part, such as the head of the patient. The imaging system integrates hard-tissue data, such as data from an x-ray or CT scan, with soft-tissue data, such as data from an MRI scan.
• In the embodiment depicted inFIG. 13, a surgeon uses an imaging system that integrates hard- and soft-tissue image data to select an implantation site. The imaging system receives the hard- and soft-tissue image data (170), and can assist the surgeon along at least two distinct paths. In one path, the imaging system receives the surgeon's implantation criteria (172). The surgeon's implantation criteria pertain to the features of the head or the features of the IMD or both. The surgeon's implantation criteria may include, for example, a range of skull curvatures, a minimum skull thickness, a minimum scalp thickness, a minimum distance from vascular and neurological structures, a planned incision location, and the like. Upon receiving the implantation criteria, the imaging system searches the image for an implantation site that meets the criteria (174).
• It is possible that more than one site may satisfy the surgeon's implantation criteria. The imaging system may present the sites in hierarchical order according to any standard, such as closest site to the burr hole caps, site with the greatest scalp thickness, and so forth. In this way, the surgeon can assess her options for implantation. It is also possible the imaging system will find no site that will satisfy all of the surgeon's implantation criteria, and the imaging system may present in any order the sites that come closest to meeting the implantation criteria.
• In a variation of this embodiment, the surgeon selects a potential implantation site (176) and the imaging system discloses information to the surgeon about the features of the head at that site (178). Upon receiving the surgeon's selection of a site anterior to the coronal suture of the skull and straddling the sagittal suture of the skull, the imaging system informs the surgeon about skull curvature at the site, skull thickness, scalp thickness, nearby vascular and neurological structures, peaks and valleys of the skull or other anomalies, and so forth. The surgeon may evaluate several potential implantation sites in the same fashion.
• Optionally, the imaging system can provide information about a device configuration that will be suitable for a particular implantation site. The imaging system can determine whether a standard configuration of an IMD can be implanted at a particular site (180). In the event the imaging system determines that a standard configuration of an IMD can be implanted at the site, the imaging system can further inform the surgeon how a standard configuration of an IMD can be flexed, bent, trimmed or otherwise adjusted for implantation at the particular site (182). In the event the imaging system determines that a standard configuration of an IMD cannot be adjusted for implantation at the site, the imaging system can specify components or dimensions for a customized IMD (184).
• The techniques ofFIG. 13 can assist a surgeon who is considering whether to make an implantation with a recess in the skull and can assist the surgeon in finding a recess site. The techniques ofFIG. 13 can also assist a surgeon who is considering whether to make a pocket, and can help the surgeon estimate the size of the pocket. The techniques ofFIG. 13 can further assist a surgeon in the development of an incision strategy, in the selection of anchor points, in the formation of a lead management strategy, and other practical aspects of the implantation procedure. In addition, the techniques ofFIG. 13 can provide information to a surgeon that may help a surgeon determine whether the patient is a candidate for an IMD.
• Furthermore, the two paths shown inFIG. 13 are not exclusive of one another. In other words, the imaging system can receive implantation criteria (172) and find one or more possible implantation sites (174), and the surgeon may evaluate each site or nearby sites (176) to learn about the features of the head at each site (178). Similarly, the surgeon can select an implantation site (176), and the imaging system can provide information about the site (178), including information as to whether the site meets received implantation criteria (172). The surgeon can take advantage of one or both paths to select an implantation site.
• In a typical embodiment, the imaging system is configured to display the IMD implanted at one or more sites. The invention encompasses embodiments, however, in which an image of the IMD is not incorporated with the hard- and soft-tissue image data.
• The invention may also be embodied as a computer-readable medium that includes instructions for causing a programmable processor, such as a processor that processes the hard- and soft-tissue image data, to carry out the methods described above. A “computer-readable medium” includes but is not limited to read-only memory, Flash memory and a magnetic or optical storage medium. The instructions may be implemented as one or more software modules, which may be executed by themselves or in combination with other software.
• Although the invention addresses various aspects of surgical strategies, the invention is not limited to the particular considerations described above. The selected site of cranial implantation of an IMD may be a function of factors other than or in addition to the patient's scalp thickness, skull thickness or skull contours. The selected site may be a function of the site of deployment of leads, for example, or the number of leads deployed. The surgeon may also weigh practical considerations pertaining to removal, or explantation, of the IMD after a time. In other words, a surgeon may select an implantation site that can be readily accessed in a future operation to remove the implanted device.
• The invention supports implantation of an IMD that performs any of several functions. The invention supports explantation of IMDs that provide monitoring, IMDs that administer therapy, and IMDs that do both. The invention is not limited to any particular number of modules, or any particular arrangement of modules, or to any particular functionality.
• Various embodiments of the invention have been described. As mentioned above, the invention is not limited to the particular embodiments described or shown in the figures. These and other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.

Claims (42)

1. A method comprising:

receiving an image of a head of a patient;

identifying physiological structure in the image, wherein the physiological structure includes one or more of skull curvature, skull thickness, scalp thickness, locations of one or more vascular structures within a scalp of the patient, or locations of one or more nerves within the scalp;

evaluating a configuration of an implantable medical device based on the physiological structure to determine whether the configuration of the implantable medical device is suitable for implantation under a scalp of the patient, the implantable medical device including a housing encasing control electronics; and

indicating the configuration of the medical device is suitable for implantation of the medical device in the event the evaluation determines the configuration to be suitable for implantation of the medical device.

2. The method ofclaim 1, further comprising selecting the configuration from a plurality of configurations based on the identified physiological structure.

3. The method ofclaim 1, further comprising receiving an indication of the configuration.

4. The method ofclaim 1, further comprising selecting the configuration from a plurality of configurations based on the identified physiological structure and a selected implantation site for the medical device under the scalp of the patient.

5. The method ofclaim 4, wherein the plurality of configurations includes a configuration of at least three modules in a triangular configuration and a configuration of at least two modules in a linear configuration.

6. The method ofclaim 1, wherein evaluating whether the configuration is suitable for implantation of the medical device includes evaluating, based on the image, whether there are any irregularities in the skull or the scalp of the patient that would impede implantation of the implantable medical device.

7. The method ofclaim 1, further comprising implanting at least the housing of the medical device under the scalp of the patient in the event the evaluation determines the configuration to be suitable for implantation of the medical device.

8. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the image comprises skull contour data.

9. The method ofclaim 1, further comprising:

generating a model of the skull of the patient as a function of the image of the head of the patient; and

providing the configuration of the implantable medical device as a function of the model of the skull.

10. The method ofclaim 9, wherein generating the model of the skull comprises generating a physical model of the skull, and

wherein providing the configuration of the implantable medical device comprises adjusting a standard configuration of the implantable medical device to fit the physical model of the skull.

11. The method ofclaim 9, wherein generating the model of the skull comprises generating a virtual model of the skull.

12. The method ofclaim 1,

wherein receiving an image of the head comprises receiving an image of a scalp of the patient; and

wherein evaluating whether the configuration is suitable for implantation of the medical device includes evaluating, as a function of the image of the scalp, whether the configuration is suitable for implantation of the medical device.

13. The method ofclaim 1, further comprising:

receiving an implantation criterion; and

disclosing to a user whether the configuration satisfies the implantation criterion.

14. The method ofclaim 13, wherein the implantation criterion is based on one or more of skull curvature, skull thickness, scalp thickness, locations of one or more vascular structures in the scalp of the patient, locations of one or more neurological structures in the scalp of the patient, or potential incision locations.

15. The method ofclaim 1, further comprising:

selecting an incision site as a function of the physiological structures; and

indicating the selected incision site to the user.

16. The method ofclaim 15, wherein the image of the head includes an image of the scalp of the patient, wherein a least a portion of the physiological structure used to select the incision site is included in the image of the scalp of the patient.

17. The method ofclaim 1, further comprising tailoring the medical device to conform to the indicated configuration.

18. The method ofclaim 17, wherein the tailoring comprises one of flexing, bending, selecting a plurality of modules, and trimming the medical device.

19. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the physiological structure includes skull curvature.

20. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the physiological structure includes skull thickness.

21. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the physiological structure includes scalp thickness.

22. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the physiological structure includes locations of one or more vascular structures within the scalp.

23. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the physiological structure includes locations of one or more nerves within the scalp.

24. The method ofclaim 1, wherein receiving the image comprises receiving an image generated by at least one of X-ray, magnetic resonance imaging, CT-scan, fluoroscopy, or ultrasound imaging.

25. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the implantable medical device includes an implantable neurostimulator.

26. A method comprising:

receiving an image of a head of a patient;

identifying physiological structure in the image, wherein the physiological structure includes one or more of skull curvature, skull thickness, scalp thickness, locations of one or more vascular structures within a scalp of the patient, or locations of one or more nerves within the scalp;

evaluating a configuration of an implantable medical device based on the physiological structure to determine whether the configuration of the implantable medical device is suitable for implantation under a scalp of the patient, the implantable medical device including a housing encasing control electronics; and

indicating the configuration is not suitable for implantation of the medical device in the event the evaluation determines the configuration is unsuitable for implantation of the medical device.

27. A computer-readable medium comprising instructions for causing a programmable processor to:

receive an image of a head of a patient;

evaluate, as a function of the image, whether a configuration of an implantable medical device satisfies an implantation criterion for implantation of the implantable medical device under a scalp of the patient, the implantable medical device including a housing encasing control electronics; and

disclose to a user whether the configuration of the implantable medical device satisfies the implantation criterion;

wherein the instructions to evaluate, as a function of the image, whether the configuration satisfies the implantation criterion include instructions to identify, based on the image, one or more of skull curvature, skull thickness, scalp thickness, locations of one or more vascular structures within the scalp, or locations of one or more nerves within the scalp, and evaluate whether the configuration satisfies the implantation criterion based on the one or more of the skull contour, skull thickness, scalp thickness, locations of one or more vascular structures within the scalp, or locations of one or more nerves within the scalp.

28. The medium ofclaim 27, wherein receiving the image comprises receiving an image generated by at least one of X-ray, magnetic resonance imaging, CT-scan, or fluoroscopy.

29. The medium ofclaim 27, the instructions further causing the processor to evaluate, as a function of the image, whether the patient is a candidate for implantation of the implantable medical device deployed in a recess created in the skull.

30. The medium ofclaim 27, the instructions further causing the processor to evaluate, based on the image, whether there are any irregularities in the skull or the scalp of the patient that would impede implantation of the implantable medical device.

31. The medium ofclaim 27, wherein the image of the head of the patient includes an image of a scalp of the patient.

32. The medium ofclaim 27, the instructions further causing the processor to:

evaluate skull contour data based on the image of the head;

propose, as a function of the skull contour data, the configuration for the implantable medical device; and

disclose the proposed configuration to the user.

33. The medium ofclaim 27, the instructions further causing the processor to:

receive the implantation criterion; and

propose at least the configuration for the implantable medical device based on the implantation criterion and the one or more of the skull contour, skull thickness, scalp thickness, locations of one or more vascular structures within the scalp, or locations of one or more nerves within the scalp.

34. The medium ofclaim 33, the instructions further causing the processor to propose a second configuration for the implantable medical device based on the implantation criterion and the one or more of the skull contour, skull thickness, scalp thickness, locations of one or more vascular structures within the scalp, or locations of one or more nerves within the scalp.

35. The medium ofclaim 33, wherein the implantation criterion is based on one or more of skull curvature, skull thickness, scalp thickness, locations of one or more vascular structures, locations of one or more neurological structures, or potential incision locations.

36. The medium ofclaim 27, the instructions further causing the processor to receive an indication of the configuration from the user.

37. The medium ofclaim 27, wherein the image of the head of the patient includes a soft-tissue image and a hard-tissue image of the head of the patient.

38. The medium ofclaim 27, wherein the instructions to evaluate, as a function of the image, whether the configuration satisfies the implantation criterion include instructions to identify, based on the image, the skull curvature and evaluate whether the configuration satisfies the implantation criterion based on the skull curvature.

39. The medium ofclaim 27, wherein the instructions to evaluate, as a function of the image, whether the configuration satisfies the implantation criterion include instructions to identify, based on the image, the skull thickness and evaluate whether the configuration satisfies the implantation criterion based on the skull thickness.

40. The medium ofclaim 27, wherein the instructions to evaluate, as a function of the image, whether the configuration satisfies the implantation criterion include instructions to identify, based on the image, the scalp thickness and evaluate whether the configuration satisfies the implantation criterion based on the scalp thickness.

41. The medium ofclaim 27, wherein the instructions to evaluate, as a function of the image, whether the configuration satisfies the implantation criterion include instructions to identify, based on the image, the locations of one or more vascular structures within the scalp and evaluate whether the configuration satisfies the implantation criterion based on the locations of one or more vascular structures within the scalp.

42. The medium ofclaim 27, wherein the instructions to evaluate, as a function of the image, whether the configuration satisfies the implantation criterion include instructions to identify, based on the image, the locations of one or more nerves within the scalp and evaluate whether the configuration satisfies the implantation criterion based on the locations of one or more nerves within the scalp.

Images