US20090046728A1 - System and method for delivering security services - Google Patents

Abstract

Systems and methods are provided for delivering security services. According to one embodiment, multiple virtual routers are established within a service processing switch, which is operable to be logically interposed between a public communications network and multiple subscriber sites. Each of the virtual routers has associated therewith a subset of processing and storage resources of the service processing switch. Subscribers are provided with respective sets of customized application layer services. Subscriber resource isolation is provided by partitioning the virtual routers between the subscribers including allocating and configuring partitions, having subsets of the virtual routers, to the subscribers. Changeable provisioning of processing capacity between the subscribers is provided by dynamically reallocating resources of the service processing switch between the partitions based on comparative processing demands of the customized application layer services.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED INVENTIONS
• This application is related to a co-pending commonly assigned application titled “PACKET ROUTING SYSTEM AND METHOD” by inventor Abraham R. Matthews and Steven P. Weir, attorney docket 1384.002US1, and to two provisional applications each titled “SYSTEMS AND METHOD FOR DELIVERING INTERNETWORKING SERVICES” attorney dockets 1384.012PRV AND 1384.013PRV each filed on even date herewith, all incorporated herein by reference.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
• This invention relates to the field of internet processors, and more specifically to a method and apparatus of delivering security services such as firewalls.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
• The service provider game has grown extremely crowded and fiercely competitive, with numerous players offering similar products and services. While having a large number of comparable services is arguably beneficial to the enterprise, it poses a host of potentially disastrous consequences for a service provider. If all competitors in a given market are offering services that are indistinguishable by the customer base, the burden of differentiation falls squarely on cost, with the least-cost competitor emerging “victorious”. Jockeying for the cost-leader position rapidly drives down service pricing, reducing margins to rubble and rendering the service a commodity. Furthermore, numerous offerings that are similar in attributes and cost make it very difficult to lock in customers.
• Operational costs also present a significant challenge to service providers. Cumbersome, manual provisioning processes are the primary culprits. Customer orders must be manually entered and processed through numerous antiquated back-end systems that have been pieced together. Once the order has been processed, a truck roll is required for onsite installation and configuration of Customer Premises Equipment (CPE), as well as subsequent troubleshooting tasks. This is a slow and expensive process that cuts into margins and forces significant up-front charges to be imposed on the customer. In order to be successful in today's market, service providers must leverage the public network to offer high-value, differentiated services that maximize margins while controlling capital and operational costs. These services must be rapidly provisioned and centrally managed so that time-to-market and, more importantly, time-to-revenue are minimized. Traditional methods of data network service creation, deployment, and management present significant challenges to accomplishing these goals, calling for a new network service model to be implemented.
• Basic Internet access, a staple of service provider offerings, has been commoditized to the point that margins are nearly non-existent. This fact has driven service providers to look for new value-added features and services to layer over basic connectivity so that they are able to differentiate on factors other than cost. The most significant opportunity for differentiation is found in managed network services. Managed network services enable enterprise IT organizations to outsource time-consuming tactical functions so that they can focus strategic core business initiatives.
• Enterprise customers are now demanding cost-effective, outsourced connectivity and security services, such as Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) and managed firewall services. Enterprise networks are no longer segregated from the outside world; IT managers are facing mounting pressure to connect disparate business units, satellite sites, business partners, and suppliers to their corporate network, and then to the Internet. This raises a multitude of security concerns that are often beyond the core competencies of enterprise IT departments. To compound the problem, skilled IT talent is an extremely scarce resource. Service providers, with expert staff and world-class technology and facilities, are well positioned to deliver these services to enterprise customers.
• While IT managers clearly see the value in utilizing managed network services, there are still barriers to adoption. Perhaps the most significant of these is the fear of losing control of the network to the service provider. In order to ease this fear, a successful managed network service offering must provide comprehensive visibility to the customer, enabling them to view configurations and performance statistics, as well as to request updates and changes. Providing IT managers with powerful Customer Network Management (CNM) tools bolsters confidence in the managed network service provider and can actually streamline the service provisioning and maintenance cycle.
Customer Premises Equipment (CPE)-based Managed Firewall Services
• Data network service providers have traditionally rolled out managed network service offerings by deploying specialized CPE devices at the customer site. This CPE is either a purpose-built network appliance that, in addition to providing specific service features, may also serve some routing function, or a mid to high-end enterprise-class server platform, typically UNIX-based. In the case of a managed firewall solution, the CPE device provides services that may include VPN tunnel termination, encryption, packet filtering, access control listings, and log files. The CPE at each customer site is aggregated at a multiplexer via leased lines and/or public Frame Relay PVCs (permanent virtual circuits) at the service provider POP (point of presence), then into a high-end access router and across the WAN (wide area network).
• In many cases, service providers and enterprise customers find it too expensive and cumbersome to deploy CPE-based security at every site, but rather deploy secure Internet access points at one or two of the largest corporate sites. In this model, all remote site Internet traffic is backhauled across the WAN to the secure access point and then out onto the Internet, resulting in increased traffic on the corporate network and performance sacrifices.
• Service providers face significant challenges when deploying, managing and maintaining CPE-based managed firewall services. When a customer expresses interest in utilizing such a service, a consultation with experienced security professionals is required to understand the corporate network infrastructure and site-specific security requirements, yielding a complex set of security policies. This may be accomplished through a set of conference calls or a number of on-site visits. Once the security requirements and policies have been identified, the service provider must procure the CPE device. In some cases, the equipment vendor may provide some level of pre-configuration based upon parameters supplied by the service provider. While CPE vendors are driving towards delivering fully templatized, pre-configured systems that are plug-and-play by enterprise staff, most service providers still assume the responsibility for on-site, hands-on configuration, and a truck-roll to each of the customer sites is necessary. This is particularly true in server-based CPE systems, where a relatively high degree of technical sophistication and expertise is required to install and configure a UNIX-based system.
• Typically, a mid-level hardware and security specialist is sent onsite, along with an account manager, to complete the CPE installation and configuration. This specialist may be a service provider employee or a systems integrator/Value-Added Reseller (VAR) who has been contracted by the service provider to complete CPE rollout. This complex process begins with physical integration of the CPE device into the customer network. In the case of a CPE appliance, where the OS and firewall/VPN software components have been pre-loaded, the tech can immediately proceed to the system configuration phase. Server-based CPE services, however, require the additional time-consuming step of loading the system OS and software feature sets, adding a further degree of complexity.
• In the configuration phase, the tech attempts to establish contact between the CPE device and central management system at the service provider NOC (network operations center). In cases where the device has not been previously assigned an IP address, an out-of-band signaling mechanism is required to complete the connection, typically a modem and a POTS line. If the integration process has been successful, NOC staff should be able to take over the process, pushing specific policy configurations (and possibly an IP address) down to the CPE device through a browser-driven management interface. This entire process must be repeated for every enterprise site utilizing the managed firewall service.
• Additionally, maintenance processes and costs for CPE-based managed firewall services can also be overwhelming to both the service provider and enterprise customers. Enterprises are forced to either keep cold spares onsite or be faced with periods of absent security when their firewall fails, a situation that is unacceptable to most of today's information intensive corporations. Service providers must have an inventory of spares readily available, as well as staff resources that can, if necessary, go onsite to repeat the system configuration process. Troubleshooting thousands of CPE devices that have been deployed at customer sites is an extremely formidable challenge, requiring extensive call center support resources, as well technicians that can be quickly deployed onsite.
• As CPE-based firewall services have traditionally been deployed in private enterprise networks, the original management systems for these devices have difficulty scaling up to manage several large, multi-site service provider customers. CPE device vendors are scrambling to ramp up these systems to carrier-grade and scale. Firewall management systems are typically GUT-based (graphical user interface-based), browser-driven interfaces that run on industrial grade UNIX platforms in the service provider NOC. The management system interfaces with the CPE devices based on IP address. The CPE-based managed firewall model faces service providers with another issue: capital costs. In addition to the significant costs required to build out a POP/access infrastructure, including multiplexers and high-capacity access routers, the service provider must also assume the initial costs of the CPE device, including firewall and VPN software licensing charges. In many cases, these costs are passed on to the customer. This creates steep up-front costs that, coupled with per-site installation charges, can present a serious barrier to service adoption. In markets where several service providers are offering managed firewall services, a service provider may absorb the CPE cost to obtain a price leadership position, cutting deeply into margins.
• The CPE-based model is also limited when rolling out services beyond the managed firewall offering. New services, such as intrusion detection, may require additional hardware and/or software. This results in higher capital costs, as well as another expensive truck roll.
• Thus, there is a need for a method and apparatus of delivering a variety of network services, for example security services such as firewalls.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
• The present invention provides a flexible, scalable hardware and software platform that allows a service provider to easily provide internet services, virtual private network services, firewall services, etc., to a plurality of customers. This solution can be changes to provision each customer with more or less processing power and storage, according to individual changing needs.
• One aspect of the present invention provides a method of delivering security services. This method includes connecting a plurality of processors in a ring configuration within a first processing system, establishing a secure connection between the processors in the ring configuration across an internet protocol (IP) connection to a second processing system to form a tunnel, and providing both router services and host services for a customer using the plurality of processors in the ring configuration and using the second processing system.
• Another aspect of the present invention provides a system of delivering security services. This system includes a plurality of processors in a ring configuration within a first processing system, and means for establishing asecure connection418 between the processors in the ring configuration across an internet protocol (IP) connection to a second processing system to form a tunnel, and for providing both router services and host services for a customer using the plurality of processors in the ring configuration and using the second processing system.
• Yet another aspect of the present invention provides asystem201 for delivering security services. This second system includes a plurality of processors within a first processing system connected in a ring configuration, and a tunnel formed using a secure connection between the processors in the ring configuration across an internet protocol (IP) connection to a second processing system, wherein both router services and host services are provided for a customer using the plurality of processors in the ring configuration and using the second processing system.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
• FIG. 1 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention,system100 having a plurality ofISP boxes10 connected to theinternet99
• FIG. 2 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention,service provider network200.
• FIG. 3 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention, an IPservice delivery platform300.
• FIG. 4 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention, asystem400 providing a plurality of virtualprivate networks410,420,430,440.
• FIG. 5 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention, a ring-network hardware platform230.
• FIG. 6 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention,service processing switch600.
• FIG. 7 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention,service system700 including conventional existing network elements.
• FIG. 8 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention,hardware elements230 andsoftware elements220.
• FIG. 9 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention,multiprocessor system900 usingring network932.
• FIG. 10 shows a block diagram of asystem1000 for comparison.
• FIG. 11 shows a block diagram of asystem100 for comparison.
• FIG. 12 shows a block diagram of asystem1200 for comparison.
• FIG. 13 shows a block diagram of asystem1300 for comparison.
• FIG. 14 shows a graph of CheckPoint operational “soft” costs1400.
• FIG. 15 shows a graph of five yeartotal capital cost1500.
DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
• In the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and in which are shown by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. It is understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention.
• The leading digit(s) of reference numbers appearing in the Figures generally corresponds to the Figure number in which that component is first introduced, such that the same reference number is used throughout to refer to an identical component which appears in multiple Figures. Signals and connections may be referred to by the same reference number or label, and the actual meaning will be clear from its use in the context of the description.
• In some embodiments, the present invention deploys one or more virtual private networks (VPNs) running on one or more carrier-class platforms that scale to provide cost-effective solutions for internet service providers (ISPs). In particular, security services such as firewalls can be provided by the ISPs for services they provide to their customers, wherein a plurality of customers are hosted on a single network of processors. An ISP is providing hosting services (e.g., hosting an internet web site for a customer) and routing (moving data to and from the internet) for their customers.
• FIG. 1 shows one embodiment of the present invention having asystem100 that includes a plurality of similar ISP (internet service provider)boxes110 connected to theinternet99. In this embodiment, eachbox110 represents a subsystem having routing services provided by a block calledaccess router111, and hosting services provided byblocks113 and114. The ISP is typically a company that provides internet services (such as connectivity to the internet, as well as servers that store data and provide data according to requests by users, and network connectivity to users) to a plurality of customers including customer A and customer B. In some embodiments,customer premises equipment117 and118 (also calledCPE117 and118, this is hardware and the software that controls the hardware, that is installed at the customer's premises; this can include servers, routers and switches, and the network connecting to individual user's workstations, and various interfaces to external communications networks) is used to provide at least a portion of the function to support customers A and B respectively, and theISP110 provides the rest inblocks113 and114 respectively. The function to support customers includes such things as web site hosting, database and other servers, e-mail services, etc. The customer'sCPE117 and118 connect to the ISP through, e.g.,access router111 andsecurity services112 to customer A site one113 and customer B site one114, and also to theinternet99 in a manner that isolates customer A and customer B from one another except for communications and E-mail that would normally pass across theinternet99.
• Further, by establishing secure connections between twoISP boxes110 across theinternet99, a virtual private network or VPN410 (seeFIG. 4 below) can be created. This function allows, for example, customer A's office at a first site (e.g., headquarters117) to connect seamlessly to customer A's office at a second site (e.g., branch office119) using what appears to them as a private network, but which actually includes some CPE atsite117, someservices113 provided within ISP110.1, a secure encrypted connection acrossinternet99, some services also in ISP110.2, and some CPE atsite119. Users atsites117 and119 can communicate with one another and share data and servers as if they were on a single private network provided by, e.g.,VPN410.
• FIG. 2 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention, service provider (SP)network200. A conventional network “cloud”98 includes the SP's internet protocol (IP) or asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) core, as is well known in the internet art.IP system201 connects to such existinginfrastructure98, as well as to other optional conventional hardware such as described inFIG. 2 below, to provideSP network200.IP System201 provideshardware230 andsoftware220 to provide a plurality of virtual routers (VRs)210. EachVR210 provides support for router services and server services such as those that providecustomer site services113 ofFIG. 1. EachVR210 is supported by anobject group211, which is a group of generally dissimilar objects such asrouting object212,packet filtering object213,firewall object212, network address translation (NAT)object215, and/or other objects. In some embodiments, eachVR210 is a separate instantiation.
• In some embodiments,software220 includes IP network operating system (IPNOS)223, service management system (SMS)221 (e.g., in some embodiments, this is the Invision™ software from CoSine Communications Inc., assignee of the present invention), and customer network management system (CNMS)222 (e.g., in some embodiments, this is the Ingage™ software from CoSine Communications Inc., assignee of the present invention).SMS221 provides such services as configuration ofblades239, defining subscribers, determining services, and generation of IP security (IPSec) public/private key pairs.CNMS222 provides such services as providing subscribers (customers) visibility to services. In some embodiments, CNMS software runs at least in part in a user's CPE or workstation, typically at a company's information services (IS) headquarters.
• In some embodiments, IP server switch (IPSX)hardware230 includes one or more scalable hardware enclosures, each having a plurality of service “blades”239 (i.e., an insertable and removable printed circuit card having one or more processors, each having its own CPU and memory) each connected in a ring configuration (such as a counter-rotating dual ring232). In some embodiments, three types ofblades239 are provided: control blade(s)234, processor blade(s)236, and access blade(s)238, IPSX hardware also includes highly available, redundant, and hot-swappable hardware support240 includingpower supplies241 andfans242.
• FIG. 3 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention, an IF service delivery platform (IPSDP)300. The hardware and software ofSP network200 can be viewed as generating various network “clouds” such asedge cloud95,access concentration cloud96, andservice processing cloud97. These are built upon the existing conventional SP's IP orATM core cloud98 and they connect to theexternal internet cloud99.IPSDP 300 includes an ISP'sSP network200 connected to one or more customer's offices301 each of which includes some amount ofCPE110. In the embodiment shown, three corporate remote offices301.1 are connected toSP network200 using various conventional communications devices, well known to the art, such asframe relay switch326, M13 multiplexor (mux)327, DSLAM (digital subscriber link access multiplexor)328, and dial-up RAS (remote access server)329 (used to receive dial-up connections, for example, from themodem311 connected tolaptop computer316 inportable system310 of dial-up telecommuter301.3). In the embodiment shown,SP network200 includes twosystems201, on connecting throughframe relay switch326, M13 multiplexor (mux)327,DSLAM328, and dial-upRAS329 to remote office'sCPE110, and the other connecting directly to the customer's corporate headquarter's CPE1110 (which also includes a control and monitoring function provided by CNMS222) using conventional communications protocols such as frame relay (FR, an access standard defined by the ITU-T in the 1.122 recommendation “Framework for Providing Additional Packet Mode Bearer Services”), internet protocol (IP), FT1 (fractional T1), T1/E1 (a digital transmission link with capacity of 1.544 Megabits per second), FT3 (fractional T3), T3 (capacity of 28 T1 lines), and/or OC3 (optical carrier level 3=three times the OC1 rate of 51.840 Mbps)(each of which is a conventional communications service well known to the art).
• In some embodiments,IPDSP300 provides aVPN410, using secure connections across theinternet99, to connect remote offices301 to one another.
• FIG. 4 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention, asystem400 providing a plurality of virtualprivate networks410,420,430,440.VPNs420,430, and440 are each equivalent to theVPN410 that supportssubscriber1, except that they are for other subscribers. Each subscriber has a set of partitionedvirtual routers210. For example,subscriber1 has two locations,411 and412, connected in aVPN410.VR210 at location411 can include someCPE110 as well as support provided in system201-1.VR210 at location412 can include someCPE110 as well as support provided in system201-2. These twoVRs210 establish a “tunnel,” a secure connection, that allows them to maintain secure communications that support theVPN410 even across packet networks such as theinternet99. EachVR210 is the equivalent of an independent hardware router. Since eachVR410 is supported by anobject group211, objects can be easily added or omitted to enable customized services on a subscriber-by-subscriber basis to meet each subscribers individual needs.SMS221 running onSP network200 allows ease of service provisioning (dynamically adding additional processors/processing power when needed, reducing the processors/processing power used forVPN410 when not needed). In some embodiments,IPNOS223 uses an open Application Program Interface (API) to enable new services to be added to the platform whenever needed.
• In some embodiments,system401 at a first site (e.g., an ISP premises locally connected to a customer office) includes IPSX201-1 having aVR210 connected toCPE117. Thissystem401 appears to the outside world as a single router having firewall services, server(s) and user(s), etc. These functions can be provided by either or bothVR210 andCPE117, thus allowing a customer to outsource many or most of these services to the service provider and IPSX201-1. Similarly,system402 at a second site (e.g., another ISP premises locally connected to a remote office of the same customer) includes IPSX201-2 having aVR210 connected toCPE119. Thissystem402 also appears to the outside world as a single router having firewall services, server(s) and user(s), etc. These functions can be provided by either or bothVR210 andCPE119, thus allowing a customer to outsource many or most of these services to the service provider and IPSX201-2.
• FIG. 5 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention, a ring-network hardware platform230.Hardware platform230 includes plurality of service “blades”239 (i.e., an insertable and removable printed circuit card having one or more processors, each having its own CPU and memory) each connected in a ring configuration (such as a counter-rotating dual ring232). In some embodiments, three types ofblades239 are provided: control blade234 (not shown here), processor blades236 (providing such functions as point-to-point (PPTP) connectivity, firewall protection against hacking, intruders, or accidental access), and access blades238 (providing such functions as NAT, encryption, and routing).
• FIG. 6 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention,service processing switch600. In some embodiments,service processing switch600 includes ahardware enclosure230 havingpower supplies241 that are hot-swappable, redundant, capable of automatic failover (when one fails, others take over), and which can be AC or DC sourced. In some embodiments, dual hot-swappable,variable speed fans242 are provided. In some embodiments, software updates can be made without system downtime by swapping out all object groups211 (virtual routers), changing the software modules, and then resuming processing. In some embodiments, allservice blades239 are hot-swappable (they can be removed and/or inserted without bringing the system down) and include automatic failover from primary mode to protect mode. In some embodiments, dual counter-rotating rings232 support primary and protect redundancy. In some embodiments,system600 providesNEBS Level 3 compliance and is Y2K ready, provides SONET (synchronous optical network) 1+1 Line Protection Switching, and includes integrated metallic cross-connects to enable DS3 (digital signal level 3; 44,736,000 bits per second) blade automatic failover without touching the facility.
• FIG. 7 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention, anintegrated system700 including conventional existing network elements.Integrated system700 optionally includes conventionalframe relay switch326,M13 mux327, DSLAM (DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER LINK ACCESS MULTIPLEXOR)328, and RAS (REMOTE ACCESS SERVER)329 connecting to customer's equipment such asCPE router110 and dial-upsystem310. In some embodiments,integrated system700 optionally includes acore IP router720 and/or a core ATM switch as part of anSP core98. This provides support for a large number of conventional technology standards, and interoperability with existing access-concentration and core-network elements. It also offers interworking between frame-relay networks and IP networks. Network address translation (NAT) enables enterprise subscribers to leave their network addressing untouched. It also enables one to merge IP and legacy networks into one, with continuity of service (COS) guarantees.
• FIG. 8 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention,hardware elements230 andsoftware elements220.Hardware elements230 include a 26-slot, two-sided chassis831 having a 22-gigabit per second (Gbps)ring midplane832.Service blades239 can be hot plugged intomidplane832 form either side ofchassis831. Three types ofservice blades239 are provided:control blades234,processor blades236, andaccess blades238. In some embodiments, four processors are provided on eachservice blade239, each processor having a CPU and its own memory, allowing specialized processing to be performed on various different daughter cards of theblades239.
• In some embodiments, asingle system chassis831 provides a redundant back plane and blade-termination facilities832. Theaccess blades238,processor blades236,control blades234,power supplies241 andfan trays242 are designed for hot-swappable operation any of these components may be removed from service while the entire system remains operational. The metallic cross connect is a passive system that provides fail-over support to allow DS3 and DS1 access facilities to be switched from one access blade to another access blade should an access port or card fail. Thephase1 chassis provides26 universal slots, each of which may be populated with control blades, access blades, and processor blades. To operate, the chassis must contain at least one control blade. Up to two control blades may be operational in a chassis at the same time. Access blades are added as input/output requirements grow, and processor blades are added as computation requirements scale.
• In some embodiments, eachsystem230 supports up to twenty-five processing blades (PB)236. Eachprocessor blade236 is designed to support three hundred Mbps of full duplex traffic while delivering IP services including application firewall, LT2P, PPTP, NAT, VPN router.
• In some embodiments, eachsystem230 supports up to two control blades (CB)234.CBs234 provide overall system supervision, IP route calculation, software update management, and network management statistics logging services. When twoCBs234 are operational within achassis831, they remain synchronized such that should eitherCB234 fail, theother CB234 automatically takes over system operation. In this process all active services remain in progress. Eachcontrol blade234 is hot swappable, so that when proper procedures are followed, a failed or malfunctioningCB234 may be removed from onoperational system230 without bringing down any customer services.
• In some embodiments, eachCB234 provides four ethernet interfaces for management traffic. Each ethernet interface has a distinct collision domain and may each be configured with a primary and secondary IP address. Ethernet interfaces designated for management use may be configured for primary and protected configurations, both sharing the same IP address, reducing ISP IP address requirements. TheCB234 ethernet interfaces may be configured for fully meshed communications over diverse paths to diverse operating systems. EachCB234 is also equipped with a random # seed generator for use in security applications.
• In some embodiments, eachsystem230 supports up to twenty-five access blades (AB)238.Access blades238 provide physical line termination, hardware-assisted IP forwarding, hardware assisted encryption services, and hardware assisted queue management. Eachaccess blade238 is hot swappable, so that when proper procedures are followed, a failed or malfunctioning ab may be removed from onoperational system230 without bringing down any customer services. In some embodiments, 10/100 ethernet-, DS3-, and OC3-type access blades are supported bysystem230.
• FIG. 9 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention,multiprocessor system900 usingring network932. In some embodiments, each of two network rings933 and934 connectnodes931 together, where eachblade239 includes one ormore nodes931, and eachnode931 is connected to one ormore processors930. In some embodiments, each processor is a high-performance processor such as an R12K processor from MIPS Corporation. In one embodiment, eachblade239 includes fournodes931, each having oneprocessor930. Eachprocessor930 include its own CPU (central processing unit)935 andmemory936, and optionally includes other hardware such as routers, encryption hardware, etc. Software tasks, in some embodiments, are split up such that one processor operates on one part of the data (e.g., the Level 7 processing) and another processor operates on another part of the data (e.g., theLevel 3 processing). In other embodiments, the various processing portions of a task all run on a single processor, multiprocessing with other tasks that share that processor. Thus, the hardware provides scalability, where low-end systems include few processors that do all the work, and high-end systems include one hundred or more processors and the work is distributed among the processors for greater speed and throughput. In some embodiments, the plurality ofprocessors930 in the ring configuration includes forming dual counter rotatingring connections933 and934, each connecting to each of the plurality ofprocessors930.
• In some embodiments, aseparate control ring935 is provided, connected to allprocessors930. Data passed on thecontrol ring935 allows control communications to be passed between processors, and in particular, allows the control blade to configure and control the other blades inIPSX201. In other embodiments,control ring935 is omitted, and its function is overlaid onrings933 and934.
• Logical Queue Identifiers
• In some embodiments, rings933 and934 are packet-passing rings. Eachpacket950 placed in the rings includes adata portion953 and a processor element identifier (PEID951) that identifies for eachnode931 which processor that packet is destined for, for example a 16-hit PEID that specifies one of 65526 PEs. If the PEID matches a processor on its particular node, thenode931 passes the packet to theproper processor930; if not, the packet is forwarded to thenext node931. In some embodiments, each packet also includes a logical queue identifier (LQID) that identifies a software entity (for example, an object group for a particular VR210) residing on thatprocessor930 for which the packet is destined.
• In some embodiments, everynode931 has a unique, globally unique (i.e., unique within anIPSX201, or within an ISP having a plurality of IPSXs201) PEW)951. In some embodiments, the way this is done is that one takes the blade ID (e.g., five bits) and you append the PE number, which is, for example, a eleven bits. Put that together in some fashion and you'll get a unique ID that is globally unique within some hardware configuration. Note that packets including thisPEID951 are routable. Just by looking at thePEID951, thesystem201 has a topological structure so that it can route based on purely thePEID951. The next thing to keep in mind is thatsystem201 is managing multiple virtual context. EachVR210 in asystem201 is a virtual router to which packet are to be directed. When packets come intonode N931 for example,system201 needs to be able to steer it to the appropriate logical entity, i.e., to the appropriate context and to the object channel that it represents. Thus, alogical queue ID952 is appended that is unique within the destination processor (PE)930. If an object in aprocessor930 onnode1930 wants to set up a channel to another object aprocessor930 onnode N930, they need to use theLQID952. Afirst LQID952 andPEID951 together represent the local end, and asecond LQID952 andPEID951 together represent the remote end of the object and so the system can map the corresponding object channel, defining the object channel that is going across the network. From a networking perspective,PEID951 looks like your IP address that routes packets like an IP address. But once you go to aparticular node931, the LQID looks like the UDP (User Datagram Protocol, a TCP/IP protocol describing how messages reach programs within a destination computer) code number. So system201 (e.g., SMS221) essentially signals and negotiates the proper LQID to have a channel going between those ends. This allows all the traffic coming into aPE930 to be steered along the appropriate object path to the appropriate object channel on that object.
• In some embodiments, an object could be talking on another channel to another object, or to the same object, using a different channel. In which case each channel uses adifferent LQID952, but thesame PEID951.
• In some embodiments,system201 sets up a shortcut that circumvents traffic that otherwise would be transmitted outsidesystem201 and then back in (e.g., traffic between twodifferent VRs210 supporting different customers). To set up such a shortcut,system201 allocates adifferent LQID952 for the shortcut. Thus, an object channel has the normal point-to-point path for normal traffic and has a multi-point-to-point path which is used for shortcut traffic. So when packets come in to the object it knows whether the packet came in on the normal path or on the shortcut path. Similarly, when the object wants to use a shortcut, it also needs to allocate a different LQID for its outbound shortcut traffic. One interesting distinction of shortcut paths is that the normal point-to-point is bidirectional and data can flow in both directions, but shortcuts data flow flows in only one direction. So a receive site can have any number of transferred sites. Any number of objects can be transmitting to the same receive site. That is why it is called multi-point-to-point.
• Further, some embodiments have different levels of shortcuts. For example, a packet can be sequentially passed to successive destinations in some embodiments. Thus there can be a complex multistage path. The shortcuts can trickle down to the ultimate end, where the packet cascades. Further, if one object knows a shortcut, it can tell other objects about its shortcut. So the other object does not have to come to the first object and then be directed to the shortcut destination, but rather can directly use the shortcut it has learned about.
• While service providers recognize the tremendous revenue potential of managed firewall services, the cost of deploying, managing and maintaining such services via traditional CPE-based methods is somewhat daunting. Service providers are now seeking new service delivery mechanisms that minimize capital and operational costs while enabling high-margin, value-added public network services that are easily provisioned, managed, and repeated. Rolling out a network-based managed firewall service is a promising means by which to accomplish this. Deploying an IP Service Delivery Platform in the service provider network brings the intelligence of a managed firewall service out of the customer premises and into the service provider's realm of control.
• An IP Service Delivery Platform consists of three distinct components. The first is an intelligent, highly scalable IP Service Processing Switch. Next is a comprehensive Service Management System (SMS) to enable rapid service provisioning and centralized system management. The last component is a powerful Customer Network Management (CNM) system which provides enterprise customers with detailed network and service performance systems, enable self-provisioning, and eases IT managers fears of losing control of managed network services.
• In a network-based managed firewall service model, the service provider replaces the high-capacity access concentration router at the POP with an IP Service Processing Switch. This is higher-capacity, more robust, and more intelligent access switch, with scalable processing up to 100+RISC CPUs. Just as with the access router, additional customer access capacity is added via installing additional port access blades to the IP Service Processing Switch chassis. Unlike conventional access routers, however, additional processor blades are added to ensure wire-speed performance and service processing.
• The intelligence resident in the IP Service Processing Switch eliminates the need to deploy CPE devices at each protected customer site. Deployment, configuration, and management of the managed firewall service all take place between the IPService Processing Switch230 and itsService Management System221, which resides on a high-end UNIX platform at the service provider NOC. The customer also has the ability to initiate service provisioning and augmentation via a web-based Customer Network Management tool that typically resides at the customer's headquarters site. This is an entirely different service delivery paradigm, requiring minimal or no truck rolls or on-site intervention.
• To roll out a managed network-based firewall service, the service provider's security staff provides a consultation to the enterprise, thereby gaining an understanding of the corporate network infrastructure and developing appropriate security policies (this is a similar process to the CPE model). Once this has been accomplished, the NOC security staff remotely accesses the IP Service Processing Switch (using the Service Management System221) at the regional POP serving the enterprise customer, and the firewall service is provisioned and configured remotely.
• This model enables the service provider to leverage the enterprise's existing services infrastructure (leased lines and Frame Relay PVCs) to deliver new, value-added services without the requirement of a truck roll. All firewall and VPN functionality resides on the IP Service Processing Switch at the POP, thus freeing the service provider from onsite systems integration and configuration and effectively hiding the technology from the enterprise customer. Firewall inspection and access control functions, as well as VPN tunneling and encryption, take place at the IP Service Processing Switch and across the WAN, while the enterprise's secure leased line or Frame Relay PVC (permanent virtual circuit) access link remains in place. The customer interface is between its router and the IP Service Processing Switch (acting as an access router), just as it was prior to the rollout of the managed firewall service. Additionally, the customer has visibility into and control over its segment of the network via the CNM that typically resides at the headquarters site.

• TABLE 1
  Comparison Between CPE-based and Network-based
  Managed Firewall Turn-up Processes

  Process	CPE-based Model	Network-based Model
  Service	Security consultation to	Security consultation to
  Preparation	identify customer	identify customer
  	requirements/policies	requirements/policies
  	CPE device(s) ordered
  	CPE device(s) preconfigured
  	CPE device(s) shipped to
  	customer site
  Service Rollout	Security technician deployed	Service provisioning
  	to site(s)	and policy
  	OS/Firewall/VPN software	configuration deployed
  	loaded (server-based model)	from NOC via Service
  	Physical network integration	Management System
  	of device	(SMS) - No truck roll
  		needed
  Additional	Repeat above for each	Add configuration
  Service	additional service	template to SMS and
  Deployment		duplicate across all
  		service points, provision
  		with CNM - No truck
  		roll
  Maintenance/	Technician on phone with	Technician at POP
  Support	customer testing CPE and	testing equipment
  	technician at POP testing
  	equipment
  	Maintain inventory of spare	Order
  	units/components in service	spares/replacement
  	region	from central vendor
  	Ship spares to customer site	repository - No truck
  	as needed	roll necessary
  	Deploy technician to	Integrate replacement
  	customer site to complete	unit component at POP
  	repairs if necessary

• The network-based firewall model also enables service providers to quickly and cost-effectively roll out managed firewall solutions at all enterprise customer sites. As a result secure Internet access can be provided to every site, eliminating the performance and complexity issues associated with backhauling Internet traffic across the WAN to and from a centralized secure access point.
• As the IP Service Delivery Platform is designed to enable value-added public network services, it is a carrier-grade system that is more robust and higher-capacity than traditional access routers, and an order of magnitude more scalable and manageable than CPE-based systems. The platform's Service Management System enables managed firewall services, as well as a host of other managed network services, to be provisioned, configured, and managed with point-and-click simplicity, minimizing the need for expensive, highly skilled security professionals and significantly cutting service rollout lead-times. The Service Management System is capable of supporting a fleet of IP Service Processing Switches and tens of thousands of enterprise networks, and interfaces to the platform at the POP from the NOC via IP address. Support for incremental additional platforms and customers is added via modular software add-ons. Services can be provisioned via the SMS system's simple point and click menus, as well as requested directly by the customer via the CNM system.
• Deployment of a robust IP Service Delivery Platform in the carrier network enables service providers to rapidly turn-up high value, managed network-based services at a fraction of the capital and operational costs of CPE-based solutions. This enables service providers to gain a least-cost service delivery and support structure. Additionally, it enables them to gain higher margins and more market share than competitors utilizing traditional service delivery mechanisms—even while offering managed firewall services at a lower customer price point.
Business Case
• This business case highlights the difference between traditional CPE-based managed firewall services (both appliance and server-based models) and managed, network-based firewall services. This comparison is based upon both capital costs and incremental operational or “soft” costs.
• This business case is modeled around a theoretical North American service provider that is rolling out a managed firewall service. The service provider has ten regional Points of Presence (POPs) across the US, and a single Network Operations Center (NOC). The business case examines growth of the managed firewall service customer base yearly over a five-year period.
Assumptions
• Three unique customer profiles
• • 5 site (4 branch sites+headquarters)
  • 50 site (49 branch sites+headquarters)
  • 200 site (199 branch sites+headquarters)
• Each unique customer profile has the following access requirements
• • 5 site customers
    • branch sites—56 Kbps
    • headquarters—T1
  • 50 site customers
    • branch sites—56 Kbps
    • headquarters—T1
  • 200 site customers
    • branch sites—128 Kbps
    • headquarters—T3
  • Greater than 500 employees at 200 site customers' headquarters
  • Less than 500 employees at 5 site and 50 site customers' headquarters
  • Static Model—bandwidth will not change over time
  • Equal distribution of customers across each of the ten POPs
  • a traditional multiplexer resides at each POP to aggregate access circuits up to channelized T3 interfaces in both the access router and the IP Service Processing Switch
  • No oversubscription through the access router/IP Service Processing Switch (ingress bandwidth=egress bandwidth)
  • An initial consultation to define customer security requirements and policies has taken place
  • Each customer site has router in place
  • List pricing (no discounts) as of January 2000
  • $150/hour billable rate for mid-level security specialist
    When to Deploy Network-Based vs. CPE-based Firewall Services
• The cost benefits of a managed, network-based Firewall Service Model becomes apparent when Service Providers are deploying managed firewall services to more than twenty-nine enterprise sites. By examining the hardware and software costs alone, a network-based model becomes more cost effective to Service Providers as they begin to roll services to more than thirty sites.
• A Check Point firewall solution (one based on Check Point hardware) would cost Service Providers $478,000 to support thirty enterprise sites; whereas, a network-based firewall solution using the IP Service Delivery supports thirty enterprise sites for $450,000 with the ability to support an additional twenty-five sites without an increase in cost. If the Service Provider wanted to deploy services to twenty-five additional sites using a Check Point solution, the total cost of support fifty-five sites would be $835,000-$385,000 more than the network-based IP Service Delivery Platform. The savings of the network-based solution would continue to scale as additional sites were added incrementally.
• If the enterprise customer does not have aCisco 7513 or a comparable router installed at these sites, Service Providers would be forced to incur even greater initial start-up costs with the Check Point solution. If routers were to be installed at each enterprise site, the network-based Firewall solution would become the more cost-effective alternative when Service Providers needed to roll out services to more than twenty-one enterprise sites.
Business Case—Models
• This business case will explore four specific managed firewall service delivery architectures as described by interviewed service providers, systems integrators, and hardware/software vendors.
CPE-Based ModelsArchitecture One: Check Point/Nokia Appliance
• This architecture employs a firewall/VPN CPE appliance, traditional access router, and software-based centralized management system to deliver a managed firewall solution. The specific components of this solution include:
• • Check Point/Nokia VPN-1/IP-330 appliance (50 user license) at branch sites
  • Check Point VPN-1/Firewall-1 software module (unlimited user license) on Sun Enterprise Ultra 250 server platform at headquarters
  • Cisco 7513 access router at the service provider's POP (redundant power, redundant RSP4)
  • Check Point Provider-1 management system at the service provider's NOC (supports 50 customers/module) with unlimited sites/customer onSun Ultra 60 platform at Network Operations Center (NOC)
• FIG. 10 shows a block diagram of asystem1000 providing a Managed Firewall Service with a CbeckPoint/Nokia Appliance Solution
Architecture Two: Check Point Server
• This architecture employs a firewall/VPN CPE server, traditional access router, and software-based centralized management system to deliver a managed firewall solution. The specific components of this solution include:
• • Check Point VPN-1/Firewall-1 software module (50 user license) onSun 5S server platform at branch sites
  • Check Point VPN-1/Firewall-1 software module (unlimited user license) on Sun Enterprise Ultra 250 server platform at headquarters
  • Cisco 7513 access router at the service provider POP (redundant power, redundant RSP4)
  • Check Point Provider-1 management system (supports 50 customers/module) with unlimited sites/customer onSun Ultra 60 platform at NOC
• FIG. 11 shows a block diagram of asystem1100, providing a Managed Firewall Service with a CheckPoint Firewall-1 Server-based Solution.
Architecture Three WatchGuard Appliance Model
• This architecture employs a firewalll/VPN CPE appliance, traditional access router, and software-based centralized management system to deliver a managed firewall solution. The specific components of this solution include:
• • WatchGuard Firebox II Plus appliance at branch sites
  • Cisco 7513 access router at the service provider POP (redundant power, redundant RSP4)
  • WatchGuard for MSS management system (supports 500 customers/module) with unlimited sites/customer on Compaq Proliant 3000 Windows NT workstation platform, Event Processor onSun Microsystems 5S server platform
• FIG. 12 shows a block diagram of asystem1200, providing a Managed Firewall Service with a WatchGuard Appliance Solution. The CPE-based managed firewall service model requires installation and configuration of system components at three network points: the service provider POP, the service provider NOC, and the customer premises.
POP Infrastructure
• Each of the three CPE-based architectures explored in this analysis employs an identical POP infrastructure. This access infrastructure is based on theCisco 7513 router. The base configuration for the 7513 includes:
• • 13-slot chassis
  • IOS Service Provider system software
  • (2) power supplies
  • (2) Route Switch Processors (RSP4)
  • (2) RSP4 128 MB DRAM Option
  • (2) RSP4 20 MB Flash Card Option
  • 2-port Fast Ethernet Card
  • 64 MB DRAM Option
  • 8 MB SRAM Option
• The RSP4 cards in this base configuration each consume one slot in the chassis, leaving 11 remaining for port adapters. An Ethernet card is added for software uploads. Ingress traffic is supported via dual-port channelized and/or dual-port unchannelized T3 cards (for dedicated T3 connections). Each channelized T3 port can support up to 128 DS0 or NxT1 channels Single-port OC-3 POS cards provide connectivity to the network uplink on the egress side. These cards each occupy a single slot. Each card requires a programmable Versatile Interface Processor (VIP2), as well as an additional 64 MB of DRAM and 8 MB of SRAM. The VIP2 and additional memory reside on the T3/OC-3 cards and do not consume additional slots.
• As described in the assumptions, a traditional multiplexer exists at each POP to aggregate various sub-T1 customer access links up to the channelized T3 interfaces on theCisco7513 router. As the POP infrastructure installation and configuration processes are uniform across all managed firewall service models explored in this analysis, the costs associated with these processes will not be quantified.
Network-Based Model of the Present Invention—Architecture Four
• IPService Delivery Platform300 that includes an IP Service Processing Switch (IPSX230), a Service Management System (SMS221) and a Customer Network Management System (CNMS222).
• This architecture employs an IP Service Processing Switch and a software-based centralized SMS to deliver a managed firewall solution. The specific components of this solution include:
• • IPSX230 (IP Service Processing Switch) at service provider POP
  • Service Management System221 onSun Ultra 60 server at service provider NOC
  • InGage™ Customer Network Management System at the subscriber's headquarters
• FIG. 13 shows a block diagram of asystem1300 that provides a Managed Firewall Service with CoSine's Network-based Solution of the present invention.
POP Infrastructure
• The POP access infrastructure in the network-based managed firewall service model is based on theCoSine Communications IPSX 9000 Service Processing Switch. The base configuration for the switch includes:
• • 26-slot chassis
  • Redundant power supply
  • IPNOS Base Software
  • Ring Bridge & Ring Bridge Pass-Thru (to complete midplane)
  • Control Blade (for communications with Invision Services Management System)
  • Dual-port Channelized DS3 Access Blade
  • Dual-port Unchannelized DS3 Access Blades
  • Processor Blade
  • OC-3c POS Trunk Blade
• The following tables analyze the cost structure of all of the above models and projects these costs out over 5 years:

• TABLE 2
  Capital Cost Summary for First Year Deployment
  of the Four Managed Firewall Scenarios

  Firewall
  implementation		Total
  scenarios	Year	Customers*	Cost

  Solution 1 Check
  Point Appliance
  Checkpoint	1	90	$.9	M
  Provider 1
  (management
  system)
  Check	1	90	$37	M
  Point/Nokia 10
  POP Appliance
  Total Check Point			$37.9	M
  #1 w/0 Cisco
  Adding Cisco to	1	90	+$2	M
  Checkpoint
  Total Check Point +			$39.9	M
  Cisco
  Solution 2 Check
  Point Server
  Checkpoint	1	90	$.9	M
  Provider 1
  (management
  system)
  Checkpoint Nokia	1	90	$31	M
  10 POP Server
  Total Check Point			$31.9	M
  #2
  Adding Cisco to	1	90	+$2	M
  Checkpoint
  Total Check Point +			$33.9	M
  Cisco
  Solution 3
  WatchGuard
  WatchGuard 10	1	90	$14	M
  POP Appliance
  Model
  WatchGuard NOC	1	90	$.07
  Appliance Model
  Management
  Total			$14.07	M
  WatchGuard
  Adding Cisco to	1	90	+$2	M
  WatchGuard
  Total			$16.07	M
  WatchGuard +
  Cisco
  Solution 4 CoSine
  CoSine 10 POP	1	90	$12	M
  Model (IPSX
  9000)
  CoSine NOC	1	90	$1.2	M
  (Invision Service
  Management
  System)
  Total CoSine			$13.2	M

  Solution $13.2 M
  Savings over	1st year		$39.9 − $13.2 =
  Check Point #1			$26.7 M
  Savings over	1st year		$31.9 − $13.2 =
  Check Point #2			$18.7 M
  Savings over	1st year		$16.07 − $13.2 =
  WatchGuard			$2.87 M
  Capital Costs spread - first year
  *Total number of customers is based on a spread across 5, 50 and 200 site configurations.
  Pricing listed is based on information from January of 2000 and is subject to change.

• TABLE 3
  Capital Cost Summary for the Fifth Year Deployment
  of the Four Managed Firewall Scenarios

  Firewall implementation		Total
  scenarios	Year	Customers*	Cost

  1.Solution 1 Check Point
  Appliance
  Checkpoint Provider
  1	5	1880	$3.8	M
  (management system)
  Check Point/Nokia 10POP	5	1880	$692	M
  Appliance
  Total Check Point #1 w/0			$705.8	M
  Cisco
  Adding Cisco toCheckpoint	5	1880	+$26	M
  Total Check Point +Cisco			$731.8	M
  2.Solution 2 Check Point
  Server
  Checkpoint Provider
  1	5	1880	$3.8	M
  (management system)
  Checkpoint Nokia 10POP	5	1880	$590	M
  Server
  TotalCheck Point #2			$593.8	M
  Adding Cisco toCheckpoint	5	1880	$26	M
  Total Check Point +Cisco			$619.8	M
  3.Solution 3WatchGuard
  WatchGuard
  10POP	5	1880	$268	M
  ApplianceModel
  WatchGuard NOC
  	5	1880	$.25
  Appliance Model
  Management
  Total WatchGuard			$268.25	M
  Adding Cisco toWatchGuard	5	1880	$26	M
  Total WatchGuard +Cisco			$294.25	M
  4.Solution 4CoSine
  CoSine
  10POP Model	5	1880	$106	M
  (IPSX 9000)
  CoSine NOC	5	1880	$1.2	M
  (Invision Service Management
  System)
  Total CoSine Solution			$107.2	M

  Savings overCheck Point #1	5th		$731.8 − $107.2 =
  	year		$624.6 M
  Savings overCheck Point #2	5th		$619.8 − $107.2 =
  	year		$512.6 M
  Savings over WatchGuard	5th		$294.25 − $107.2 =
  	year		$187.05 M
  Capital Costs spread - fifth year
  *Total number of customers is based on a spread across 5, 50 and 200 site configurations.
  Pricing listed is based on information from January of 2000 and is subject to change.

Analysis
• Analysis of the four service delivery architectures for deploying a managed firewall service reveals extremely compelling data in favor of implementing the network-based model based on the CoSine Communications IP Service Delivery Platform. Significant advantages are gained by utilizing this model in each of the following areas.
Operational “Soft” Costs
• The network-based managed firewall solution eliminates most of the steep operational costs that are associated with deploying a CPE-based solution, specifically the per site truck roll and device installation charges. The CheckPoint server-based CPE deployment and installation operational costs alone exceed the total five-year capital equipment investment required in the CoSine Communications network-based model. Thesecosts1400 are shown inFIG. 14. Though the installation and configuration costs for the POP and NOC build-outs are not quantified in this study due to the uniformity of these processes across all solutions, it is worthy to note that the greater capacity of theCoSine IPSX 9000 Service Processing Switch and Invision Service Management System result in fewer components (switch chassis, NOC servers and software) that need to be installed and configured.
• FIG. 14 shows a graph CheckPoint Operational “soft” Costs1400. This chart represents only operational costs associated with the Check Point CPE appliance and server models. In the context of this model, there are no soft costs associated with the CoSine Communications network-based model or the WatchGuard CPE appliance model.

• 		Server	Appliance
  Truck Roll	Security Tech/hr	Installation (hr)	Installation (hr)
  $500	$150	12	4
  *Assumptions for “soft” cost calculations.

• Capital Costs
• The network-based managed firewall solution has total capital costs that, over the five-year customer growth period of this study, are an order of magnitude less than the CPE-based solutions. The total capital costs for each solution are shown inFIG. 15.
• FIG. 15 shows a graph of five yeartotal capital cost1500.
Time to Market, Time to Revenue
• The network-based managed firewall solution enables service providers to greatly shorten the lead-time required to deploy the managed firewall service. The removal of the CPE component from the service offering eliminates the need to procure the device, eliminating a 1-2 week delay in service rollout. This also eliminates the 2-4 week delay that is associated with scheduling an onsite installation.
Complexity
• The network-based managed firewall solution greatly reduces the complexity associated with deploying the service. The number of distributed devices is reduced from thousands of remote customer sites to only 10 already staffed POPs, simplifying management and maintenance significantly.
• The network-based managed firewall service model creates a new source of revenue for service providers that is scalable, repeatable, and cost-effective. Leveraging centrally-managed services enables service providers to derive greater value from the existing basic access infrastructure. The network-based model eliminates expensive onsite installation and maintenance required of CPE-based solutions, and provides a foundation to deploy additional value-added services via the same delivery mechanism. Elimination of the CPE device also effectively hides the technology of the managed firewall solution from the customer, reducing internal network complexity and technical anxiety.
• The CoSine Communications IPService Delivery Platform300 enables service providers to reap the benefits of deploying a network-based managed firewall service. TheIPSX 9000 Service Processing Switch is a robust, high-availability platform that is capable of supporting hundreds of customer sites and network-based firewalls. The Invision Services Management System is capable of rapidly provisioning and managing thousands of managed firewall customers throughout an extensive nationwide network, enabling service providers to leverage volume security services driven by fewer staff resources. And the InGage™ Customer Network Management System empowers customer IT managers to view and augment managed network services. The IP Service Delivery Platform positions service providers to continuously deploy new value-added services to their customer base, maximizing revenues and creating customer lock-in.
• Service providers utilizing the IPService Delivery Platform300 are to gain a significant competitive edge in deploying high-value IP-based services. The CoSine Communications solution of the present invention enables services providers to save up to 85% on the capital costs associated with deploying a managed firewall service over traditional CPE-based approaches. Additionally, the CoSine solution of the present invention virtually eliminates the steep operational “soft” costs that plague the CPE approach, which total $79-161M in the 5-year model architecture. These savings add up to literally tens to hundreds of millions of dollars over a five-year period. Furthermore, as customer numbers and bandwidth requirements increase over time, so do the cost savings. This enables service providers to gain a cost-leadership position while greatly increasing revenues.
• In closing, the IP Service Delivery Platform (IPSDP 300) is an ideal solution for service providers seeking to offer high value managed, network-based firewall services.
• One aspect of the present invention provides a method of packet routing. The method includes connecting a plurality of processors in a network, assigning a unique processor identifier (PEID) to each of the processors, routing a first packet to a first one of the processors across the network, wherein each such packet includes a PEID value corresponding to a PEID of one of the processors, and wherein the routing to the first processor is based on the PEID value in the first packet, establishing a plurality of objects in the first processor, assigning a logical queue identifier (LQID) to a first one of the objects in the first processor, wherein each packet also includes an LQID value corresponding to an LQID of one of the objects, and routing the first packet to the first object based on the LQID value in the first packet.
• Some embodiments further include assigning a plurality of different LQIDs to the first object.
• Some embodiments further include routing a plurality of packets, each having a different LQID, to the first object based on the LQID value in each respective packet.
• In some embodiments, the first object is associated with a virtual router (VR).
• Some embodiments further include establishing the first LQID with the first object to be used for point-to-point data traffic, and establishing a second LQID with the first object to be used for shortcut data traffic.
• In some embodiments, the network is configured in a ring topology.
• Another aspect of the present invention provides a system for routing packets. This system includes a plurality of processors coupled to one another using a network, wherein each of the processors a unique processor identifier (PEID), wherein a first packet is routed into a first one of the processors across the network, wherein each such packet includes a PEID value corresponding to a PEID of one of the processors, and wherein the routing to the first processor is based on the PEID value in the first packet, a plurality of objects in the first processor, wherein each such object is assigned a logical queue identifier (LQID), wherein each packet also includes an LQID value corresponding to an LQID of one of the objects, and software for routing the first packet to the first object based on the LQID value in the first packet.
• In some embodiments, a plurality of different LQIDs are simultaneously assigned to the first object.
• In some embodiments, the means for routing includes means for routing a plurality of packets, each having a different LQID, to the first object based on the LQID value in each respective packet.
• In some embodiments, the first object is associated with a virtual router (VR).
• In some embodiments, the first LQID is associated with the first object to be used for point-to-point data traffic, and a second LQID is associated with the first object to be used for shortcut data traffic.
• In some embodiments, the network is configured in a ring topology.
• Still another aspect of the present invention provides a system for routing packets. This system includes a plurality of processors coupled to one another using a network, wherein each of the processors a unique processor identifier (PEID), wherein a first packet is routed into a first one of the processors across the network, wherein each such packet includes a PEID value corresponding to a PEID of one of the processors, and wherein the routing to the first processor is based on the PEID value in the first packet, and a plurality of objects in the first processor, wherein each such object is assigned a logical queue identifier (LQID), wherein each packet also includes an LQID value corresponding to an LQID of one of the objects, wherein the first packet is routed to the first object based on the LQID value in the first packet.
• Some embodiments further include a services management system that provides changeable provisioning of processor capacity among a plurality of customers.
• Some embodiments further include a services management system that provides firewall protection for each of a plurality of customers.
• The network-based managed firewall service model creates a new source of revenue for service providers that is scalable, repeatable, and cost-effective. Leveraging centrally-managed services enables service providers to derive greater value from the existing basic access infrastructure. The network-based model eliminates expensive onsite installation and maintenance required of CPE-based solutions, and provides a foundation to deploy additional value-added services via the same delivery mechanism. Elimination of the CPE device also effectively hides the technology of the managed firewall solution from the customer, reducing internal network complexity and technical anxiety.
• The CoSine Communications IPService Delivery Platform300 enables service providers to reap the benefits of deploying a network-based managed firewall service. TheIPSX 9000 Service Processing Switch is a robust, high-availability platform that is capable of supporting hundreds of customer sites and network-based firewalls. The InVision Services Management System is capable of rapidly provisioning and managing thousands of managed firewall customers throughout an extensive nationwide network, enabling service providers to leverage volume security services driven by fewer staff resources. And the InGage™ Customer Network Management System empowers customer IT managers to view and augment managed network services. The IP Service Delivery Platform positions service providers to continuously deploy new value-added services to their customer base, maximizing revenues and creating customer lock-in.
• Service providers utilizing the IPService Delivery Platform300 are to gain a significant competitive edge in deploying high-value IP-based services. The CoSine Communications solution enables services providers to save up to 85% on the capital costs associated with deploying a managed firewall service over traditional CPE-based approaches. Additionally, the CoSine solution of the present invention virtually eliminates the steep operational “soft” costs that plague the CPE approach, which total $79-161M in the 5-year model architecture. These savings add up to literally tens to hundreds of millions of dollars over a five-year period. Furthermore, as customer numbers and bandwidth requirements increase over time, so do the cost savings. This enables service providers to gain a cost-leadership position while greatly increasing revenues.
• In closing, the IP Service Delivery Platform (IPSDP 300) is an ideal solution for service providers seeking to offer high value managed, network-based firewall services.
• In some embodiments, a set of one or more management consultants to the networking industry help equipment vendors, service providers and enterprises make strategic decisions, mitigate risk and affect change through business and technology consulting engagements. This approach is tailored to each client's specific issues, objectives and budget.
• These consultants are leaders in the networking industry and influence its direction though confidential engagements for industry leaders and through public appearances and trade magazine articles. These interactions assure clients that they will be among the first to know of the latest industry concepts and emerging technology trends.
• Each consulting engagement is uniquely structured-no forced methodologies or canned reports are employed. An integrated client/management consultant case team respecting and soliciting the opinions of everyone is formed for each engagement.
CONCLUSION
• The present invention provides a flexible, scalable hardware and software platform that allows a service provider to easily provide internet services, virtual private network services, firewall services, etc., to a plurality of customers. This solution can be changes to provision each customer with more or less processing power and storage, according to individual changing needs.
• One aspect of the present invention provides a method of delivering security services. This method includes connecting a plurality ofprocessors930 in a ring configuration within a first processing system, establishing a secure connection between the processors in the ring configuration across an internet protocol (IP) connection to a second processing system to form a tunnel, and providing both router services and host services for a customer using the plurality of processors in the ring configuration and using the second processing system.
• In some embodiments, one or more processors In some embodiments, to support a communications network, the plurality of processors includes one or more control processors, one or more access processors, and one or more processing processors.
• In some embodiments, for each of a plurality of customers, avirtual router210 is formed in thefirst processing system401 and is operably connected to avirtual router210 formed in thesecond system402.
• In some embodiments, for each of a plurality of customers, a virtualprivate network410 is formed using avirtual router210 formed in thefirst processing system401 and operably connected to avirtual router210 formed in thesecond system402.
• In some embodiments, the connecting a plurality of processors in the ring configuration includes forming dual counter rotatingring connections933 and934, each connecting to each of the plurality ofprocessors930.
• Another aspect of the present invention provides a system of delivering security services. Thissystem201 includes a plurality ofprocessors230 in a ring configuration within afirst processing system401, and means for establishing asecure connection418 between the processors in the ring configuration411 across an internet protocol (IP) connection to a second processing system412 to form a tunnel, and for providing both router services and host services for a customer using the plurality of processors in the ring configuration411 and using the second processing system412.
• In some embodiments, to support a communications network, the plurality of processors includes one or more control processors, one or more access processors, and one or more processing processors.
• In some embodiments, for each of a plurality of customers, a virtual router is formed in the first processing system and is operably connected to a virtual router formed in the second system.
• In some embodiments of this system, for each of a plurality of customers, a virtual private network is formed using a virtual router formed in the first processing system and operably connected to a virtual router formed in the second system.
• In some embodiments of this system, the plurality of processors in the ring configuration includes dual counter rotating ring connections, each connecting to each of the plurality of processors.
• Yet another aspect of the present invention provides asystem201 for delivering security services. Thissecond system201 includes a plurality of processors within a first processing system connected in a ring configuration, and a tunnel formed using a secure connection between the processors in the ring configuration across an internet protocol (IP) connection to a second processing system, wherein both router services and host services are provided for a customer using the plurality of processors in the ring configuration and using the second processing system.
• In some embodiments of this second system, to support a communications network, the plurality ofprocessors930 includes one ormore control processors234, one ormore access processors238, and one ormore processing processors236. In some embodiments, one or more of these processors is packaged on ablade239.
• In some embodiments of this second system, for each of a plurality of customers, avirtual router210 is formed in thefirst processing system401 and is operably connected to avirtual router210 formed in thesecond system402.
• In some embodiments of this second system, for each of a plurality of customers, a virtualprivate network410 is formed using avirtual router210 formed in thefirst processing system401 and operably connected to avirtual router210 formed in thesecond system410.
• In some embodiments of this second system, the plurality ofprocessors230 in the ring configuration includes dual counter rotatingring connections932 and933, each connecting to each of the plurality ofprocessors930.
• Some embodiments of this second system further include aservices management system221 that provides changeable provisioning of processor capacity among a plurality of customers.
• Some embodiments of this second system further include aservices management system221 that provides firewall protection for each of a plurality of customers.
• Some embodiments of this second system further include aservices management system221 that provides provisioning of processor capacity among a plurality of customers, wherein each customer's resources are isolated from those of all the other customers.
• It is understood that the above description is intended to be illustrative, and not restrictive. Many other embodiments will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description. The scope of the invention should, therefore, be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.

Claims (13)

1-18. (canceled)

19. A method comprising:

establishing a plurality of virtual routers within a service processing switch, the service processing switch operable to be logically interposed between a public communications network and a plurality of subscriber sites and provide services to a plurality of subscribers of a service provider, each of the plurality of virtual routers having associated therewith a subset of processing and storage resources of the service processing switch;

providing a first subscriber and a second subscriber of the plurality of subscribers with a first set of customized application layer services and a second set of customized application layer services, respectively, and providing subscriber resource isolation by partitioning the plurality of virtual routers between the first subscriber and the second subscriber including (i) allocating and configuring a first partition, comprising a first subset of the plurality of virtual routers, to the first subscriber and (ii) allocating and configuring a second partition, comprising a second subset of the plurality of virtual routers, to the second subscriber; and

providing changeable provisioning of processing capacity between the first subscriber and the second subscriber by dynamically reallocating resources of the service processing switch between the first partition and the second partition based on comparative processing demands of the first set of customized application layer services and the second set of customized application layer services.

20. The method ofclaim 19, wherein the first set of customized application layer services comprises one or more of firewall protection, web site hosting, internet services, e-mail services and virtual private network services.

21. The method ofclaim 19, wherein in said providing changeable provisioning of processing capacity between the first subscriber and the second subscriber is controlled by a services management system of the service provider.

22. An Internet Protocol (IP) service delivery platform comprising:

a first service processing switch operable within a first point-of presence (POP) to provide customized application layer services to a plurality of subscribers of a service provider, the first POP being associated with a first site of a first subscriber of the plurality of subscribers and a first site of a second subscriber of the plurality of subscribers, the first service processing switch including a first set of processing resources and having established therein a first set of virtual routers among which the first set of processing resources are initially allocated;

a second service processing switch communicatively coupled with the first service processing switch via a network and operable within a second POP to provide customized application layer services to the plurality of subscribers, the second POP being associated with a second site of the first subscriber and a second site of the second subscriber, the second service processing switch including a second set of processing resources and having established therein a second set of virtual routers among which the second set of processing resources are initially allocated;

wherein isolation between processing resources associated with a first set of customized application layer services being provided to the first subscriber and those associated with a second set of customized application layer services being provided to the second subscriber is accomplished by partitioning of the first set of virtual routers and the second set of virtual routers between the first subscriber and the second subscriber including (i) allocating and configuring a first partition, comprising a first subset of the first set of virtual routers and a first subset of the second set of virtual routers, to the first subscriber and (ii) allocating and configuring a second partition, comprising a second subset of the first set of virtual routers and a second subset of the second set of virtual routers, to the second subscriber; and

wherein the first and second service processing switches are operable to provide changeable provisioning of processing capacity between the first subscriber and the second subscriber by dynamically reallocating the first set of processing resources or the second set of processing resources between the first partition and the second partition based on comparative processing demands of the first subscriber and the second subscriber.

23. The IP service delivery platform ofclaim 22, wherein the first subscriber is provided with a first virtual private network (VPN) communicatively coupling the first site of the first subscriber with the second site of the first subscriber by establishing a first secure communication channel through the network and interconnecting virtual routers of the first partition.

24. The IP service delivery platform ofclaim 23, wherein the second subscriber is provided with a second VPN communicatively coupling the first site of the second subscriber with the second site of the second subscriber by establishing a second secure communication channel through the network and interconnecting virtual routers of the second partition.

25. The IP service delivery platform ofclaim 24, wherein the first secure communication channel and the second secure communication channel are established by sharing a single secure tunnel between the first service processing switch and the second service processing switch.

26. The IP service delivery platform ofclaim 22, further comprising a services management system communicatively coupled with the first service processing switch and the second service processing switch and wherein said changeable provisioning of processing capacity is responsive to directives issued by the services management system.

27. A service processing switch operable within a service provider network logically interposed between a public communications network and a plurality of subscriber sites to provide services to a plurality of subscribers of a service provider, the service processing switch comprising:

a plurality of service blades each having a plurality of processing resources and a plurality of storage resources;

a plurality of virtual routers each having associated therewith a subset of the plurality of processing resources and a subset of the plurality of storage resources;

wherein isolation between those of the plurality of processing resources and those of the plurality of storage resources associated with a first set of customized application layer services being provided to a first subscriber of the plurality of subscribers and those associated with a second set of customized application layer services being provided to a second subscriber of the plurality of subscribers is accomplished by partitioning of the plurality of virtual routers into a first partition and a second partition including (i) allocating and configuring the first partition, comprising a first subset of the plurality of virtual routers, to the first subscriber and (ii) allocating and configuring the second partition, comprising a second subset of the plurality of virtual routers, to the second subscriber; and

wherein the service processing switch is operable to provide changeable provisioning of resource capacity between the first subscriber and the second subscriber by dynamically reallocating the plurality of processing resources or the plurality of storage resources between the first partition and the second partition based on comparative needs of the first subscriber and the second subscriber.

28. A method comprising:

a step for establishing a plurality of virtual routers within a service processing switch, the service processing switch operable to be logically interposed between a public communications network and a plurality of subscriber sites and provide services to a plurality of subscribers of a service provider, each of the plurality of virtual routers having associated therewith a subset of processing and storage resources of the service processing switch;

a step for providing a first subscriber and a second subscriber of the plurality of subscribers with a first set of customized application layer services and a second set of customized application layer services, respectively, and providing subscriber resource isolation by partitioning the plurality of virtual routers between the first subscriber and the second subscriber; and

a step for dynamically reallocating resources of the service processing switch to address relative processing demands of the first set of customized application layer services and the second set of customized application layer services.

29. An Internet Protocol (IP) service delivery platform comprising:

a first service processing switch means operable within a first point-of presence (POP) for providing customized application layer services to a plurality of subscribers of a service provider, the first POP being associated with a first site of a first subscriber of the plurality of subscribers and a first site of a second subscriber of the plurality of subscribers, the first service processing switch means including a first set of processing resources and having established therein a first set of virtual routers among which the first set of processing resources are initially allocated;

a second service processing switch means, communicatively coupled with the first service processing switch via a network and operable within a second POP, for providing customized application layer services to the plurality of subscribers, the second POP being associated with a second site of the first subscriber and a second site of the second subscriber, the second service processing switch including a second set of processing resources and having established therein a second set of virtual routers among which the second set of processing resources are initially allocated;

wherein isolation between processing resources associated with a first set of customized application layer services being provided to the first subscriber and those associated with a second set of customized application layer services being provided to the second subscriber is accomplished by partitioning of the first set of virtual routers and the second set of virtual routers between the first subscriber and the second subscriber including (i) allocating and configuring a first partition, comprising a first subset of the first set of virtual routers and a first subset of the second set of virtual routers, to the first subscriber and (ii) allocating and configuring a second partition, comprising a second subset of the first set of virtual routers and a second subset of the second set of virtual routers, to the second subscriber; and

wherein the first service processing switch means and the second service processing switch means are further operable to provide changeable provisioning of processing capacity between the first subscriber and the second subscriber by dynamically reallocating the first set of processing resources or the second set of processing resources between the first partition and the second partition based on comparative processing demands of the first subscriber and the second subscriber.

30. A program storage device readable by a service processing switch, tangibly embodying a program of instructions executable by the service processing switch to perform method steps for providing customized application layer services to a plurality of subscribers of a service provider, said method steps comprising:

establishing a plurality of virtual routers within the service processing switch, the service processing switch operable to be logically interposed between a public communications network and a plurality of subscriber sites and provide services to the plurality of subscribers, each of the plurality of virtual routers having associated therewith a subset of processing and storage resources of the service processing switch;

providing a first subscriber and a second subscriber of the plurality of subscribers with a first set of customized application layer services and a second set of customized application layer services, respectively, and providing subscriber resource isolation by partitioning the plurality of virtual routers between the first subscriber and the second subscriber including (i) allocating and configuring a first partition, comprising a first subset of the plurality of virtual routers, to the first subscriber and (ii) allocating and configuring a second partition, comprising a second subset of the plurality of virtual routers, to the second subscriber; and

providing changeable provisioning of processing capacity between the first subscriber and the second subscriber by dynamically reallocating resources of the service processing switch between the first partition and the second partition based on comparative processing demands of the first set of customized application layer services and the second set of customized application layer services.

Images