US20080183300A1 - Fixation technology - Google Patents

Abstract

The invention relates to a method for the repair of damaged tissue present at or on the surface of bone in an animal, the method comprising forming a narrow groove around at least part of said damaged tissue, which groove extends into the bone below the damaged tissue, replacing the tissue around which the groove extends by at least one layer of biocompatible replacement material, and anchoring the material to the bone by the use of retaining means extending from the material into the groove; instruments for use in the repair of damaged tissue and kits comprising said instruments.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
• This application is a division of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/148,503, which was the National Stage of International Application No. PCT/GB00/04624, filed Dec. 4, 2000, which prior applications are incorporated by reference.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
• This invention relates to methods, instruments and devices involved in the repair of damaged tissue present at or on the surface of bone, and/or for filling cavities at the surface of, or in the bones (e.g. condyles of a knee joint), in an animal, including a human being.
• Reference will be made hereinbelow to the repair of damaged cartilage. It should be understood that the damaged tissue may be other types of tissue (e.g. bone, skin) including damaged surface of, or defects in, bone itself. Reference will also be made hereinbelow to the repair of cartilage of knee joints and again it should be understood that the present invention may be applied to other body joints and indeed to other organs of the body which consist of or incorporate bone or skin.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
• Defects in the articular surfaces of the knee joint, especially in young active individuals, are currently a focus of interest by orthopedic surgeons. Damage to cartilage which protects joints can result from either physical injure (e.g. osteochondral fracture, secondary damage due to cruciate ligament injury) or from disease (e.g. osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, aseptic necrosis, osteochondritis dissecans). Osteoarthritis results from general wear and tear of joints and is common in the elderly. Rheumatoid arthritis is an inflammatory condition which results in the destruction of cartilage. It is thought to be, at least in part, an autoimmune disease with suffers having a genetic predisposition to the disease. Orthopedic prevention/repair of damaged joints is a significant burden on the medical profession both in terms of expense and time spent treating patients.
• Drug intervention to ameliorate or prevent the onset of cartilage loss are available but do have significant disadvantages.
• As an alternative to drug intervention, thus avoiding undesirable side effects, orthopedic surgery is available in order to repair defects and prevent articular damage, thereby leading to serious degenerative changes in the joint. Such changes may result in the need for a total knee replacement which is particularly undesirable in young active individuals with a long life expectancy. If the lifetime of the implant is less than that of the patient, a revision procedure may be necessary. Preferably, such revision procedures are to be avoided, having regard to inconvenience to the patient. Furthermore implant revision procedures are both lengthy and very costly. The use of surgical techniques to repair/replace damaged tissue in joints often requires the removal and donation of healthy tissue to replace the damaged or diseased tissue. There are three sources of donating tissue used in tissue engineering of this type:
• i) autograft: tissue is removed from an area of the patient remote from the region to be repaired and grafted to the damaged region to effect the repair;
• ii) allograft: tissue is removed from a donating individual, for example a cadaver, and transplanted to the damaged region; and
• iii) xenograft: tissue is harvested from another animal species, for example a pig, and placed over the damaged area.
• Autografts can be problematic due to the limited availability of suitable tissue and the added trauma to the patient during removal of the tissue from another part of the body to the damaged area. Allografts are limited by immunological reactivity of the host, availability of suitable donor tissue and the problem of transfer of infective agents. Xenografts are even more problematic due to the severe immunological reactivity.
• Various techniques for cartilage repair are either in limited current use or under, development but publicly disclosed. The Osteochondral Autogenous Transplant System (OATS) of Arthrx Inc. is arguably the most widely used method. Osteochondral plugs are harvested from a healthy donor and, more particularly, from a site which is claimed to be ‘non-weight-bearing’. These plugs are transplanted into the site of the chondral defect. This procedure has been applied primarily in the knee joint.
• However, there are no donor sites in the knee with cartilage of a comparable thickness to that of the deficient site which can be described as ‘non-weight-bearing’ areas. The sulcus terminalis, a frequently used site for harvesting such grafts, is in direct contact with the lateral meniscus at the position of full knee extension, and is therefore a weight-bearing site.
• Furthermore, harvesting a large osteochondral plug from the sulcus terminalis may cause the lateral meniscus to become loose and thus impair its load-bearing function. As a result, all the tibio-femoral loads would be transmitted onto the small area of direct contact between the femur and tibia. The resultant stresses could be as high as those arising after meniscectomy with its consequential degenerative changes in the cartilage of the tibial plateau. Such changes have always been regarded as precursors to osteoarthritis.
• While the OATS method provides a reasonable technique, including good instrumentation, for transplanting live autogenous grafts for repair of defects in cartilage, it involves introducing potentially damaging effects at other sites with the serious disadvantages discussed above. In addition, harvesting a plug from a donor site creates a new damage in the knee articular surface. For this reason, OATS would not be suitable for the repair of large defects. The use of OATS for small repairs would probably limit the magnitude of the problem discussed above, but it would also limit the indication for using this technique.
• The technique known as Autogenous Chondrocyte Implants (ACI) of Genzyme Inc. is a conceptually elegant approach which is gaining popularity, but still in limited use. The procedure is intended for repair of small as well as large irregular defects, and is achieved in a two stage surgery. In the first stage, chondrocytes (cartilage cells) are harvested from the patient and cultured in suspension. In the second stage of the operative procedure, cartilage residue is cleared from the repair site. The site is then covered with a piece of periosteal tissue which is sutured to the perimeter of the repair area. The chondrocytes are then injected into the repair site using a hypodermic syringe, puncturing the periosteum with the needle of the syringe. In a variation of this procedure, the periosteal tissue is applied to the repair site in the first stage of the operation to ensure that, by the time the chondrocytes are due to be injected, an adequate seal has formed between the tissue and the perimeter of the cartilage. There is a high probability of the chondrocytes escaping through the hole of the hypodermic needle in either version of the procedure.
• A further problem with the second version of the procedure is the probability of tissue adhesions occurring between the periosteal tissue and the bottom of the repair site.
• This procedure does not have an established rate of success and the quality of cartilage in the repair site is questionable. As with the OATS method, this procedure is not minimally invasive. Further, it is an extremely costly procedure. It is also a disadvantage that it requires two operative procedures although the first stage is less invasive as it can be performed arthroscopically.
• A procedure proposed by Smith & Nephew involves the production of cartilage discs formed by allogenic chondrocyte culture on an absorbable textile fabric. The discs are grown in the laboratory, the allogenic chondrocytes being cultured on a matrix of a non-woven mesh of a bioabsorbable material, typically polyglycolic acid. When this procedure is completed, the disc is supplied for implantation at the repair site.
• An advantage of this method is that it does not involve damage to an intact healthy chondral site since the method uses allogenic sources. Furthermore the procedure is completed in a one stage operation.
• The discs can be made in different sizes but there must be a limit to the size of the defect which can be repaired with a loose disc which is merely placed on the repair site. The implant could move freely in the joint. It could wrinkle under the influence of tangential forces and could be completely damaged as a result. This problem would be exacerbated by a low compressive modulus of the material.
• A further disadvantage with this method is that the material, being an allograft, runs the risk of viral infection, for example, the HIV virus. Although a small risk, this is an inherent problem with any allograft.
• A further problem to be anticipated with this type of graft is the compressive modulus of the material. It may be quite low and the material might be in need of mechanical conditioning (a time consuming and costly process) to achieve a modulus compatible with that of cartilage of the surrounding area.
• The Depuy cartilage repair system is a disc of non-woven fabric made of bioabsorbable material that has a hard substrate which enables the implant to be attached to the bone. The shape of the disc allows repair of damaged areas of irregular shapes by using a plurality of discs in a close-packed array. The disadvantages with this system are that the use of too many adjacent hexagonal discs will result in much damage to the bone substrate, and, further the technique may require considerable skill and its application may also be time consuming.
STATEMENTS OF INVENTION
• In its broadest aspect the invention relates to a method to repair damaged tissue by forming a groove in said damaged tissue which provides a foundation for the application of material to a site to be repaired wherein said material is anchored in place by securing means.
• According to the present invention there is provided a method for the repair of damaged tissue present at or on the surface of bone in an animal, including a human being, the method comprising forming a narrow groove around said damaged tissue, which groove extends into the bone below the damaged tissue, replacing the tissue around which the groove extends by at least one layer of biocompatible replacement material, and anchoring the material to the bone by the use of retaining means extending from the material into the groove.
• In a preferred method of the invention said repair extends to the replacement of damaged bone tissue in conjunction with the repair/replacement of tissue attached to bone, eg cartilage.
• It is well known in the art that damage to joints can extend into bone tissue which requires remedial action to effect a complete repair. Materials used in the repair of bone are also well known in the art and include, by example and not by way of limitation, synthetic bone replacement material (e.g. hydroxyapatite blocks/granules, as well as hydroxyapatite filled polymers); pulverized bone; coral.
• Preferably the groove is formed by a reaming device.
• Preferably the depth of the groove is a multiple of the thickness of tissue which is replaced. For instance, where the tissue to be replaced is circular then the depth of the groove is preferably at least equal to the diameter of the tissue being replaced. It will be apparent to one skilled in the art that the groove is of sufficient depth to securely retain the replacement material so that it does not get dislodged as the joint articulates. The deeper the groove the more secure the implanted replacement material. However care must be taken to ensure the groove is not too deep since this would represent increased invasiveness.
• Preferably the replacement material is in the form of at least one circular, crescent shaped or part circular pad(s) stacked on top of each other. More preferably still said replacement material comprises a plurality of pads. It will be apparent to one skilled in the art that the number of replacement pads used will be determined by the depth of the resultant recess formed after removal of damaged tissue.
• It will also be apparent to one skilled in the art that replacement material is broadly construed as materials which facilitate repair such as, tissue (e.g. cartilage, bone, synovium), cells from different origins including chondrocytes, biocompatible gel, comprising tissue/cells, synthetic bone material, coral.
• In conditions where extensive damage to tissue has occurred it is preferable to use at least two closely associated pads. For example, and not by way of limitation,FIG. 10 shows a pad arrangement wherein two concentric grooves are formed. A first pad is positioned within the first concentric groove at a site to be repaired. A second, larger concentric groove is formed around the first concentric groove and a second, ring shaped pad, is positioned within the second concentric groove. In this arrangement, two retaining means are used to anchor the pads of replacement material at the site to be repaired.
• The material may be bio-absorbable or non-bio-absorbable.
• More preferably still said pad provides an increased surface area to which cells adhere and proliferate. More preferably still said pad promotes the differentiation of cells which adhere thereto.
• Preferably said pad is adapted to provide a cell culture surface to which at least one of the following cell types adhere, proliferate and/or differentiate: chondrocytic progenitor cells (stem cells); chondrocytes or cartilage-forming cells. Furthermore cells can be genetically engineered to express gene products which, for example facilitate the attachment and/or differentiation of cells which infiltrate the pad.
• Ideally said pad is immune silent. It will be apparent to one skilled in the art that it is desirable that the pad does not provoke an immune reaction in the patient.
• Preferably the retaining means is in the form of a thin, flexible mesh, more preferably made of a woven fabric.
• Alternatively, the retaining means is made of non-woven fabric.
• More preferably said replacement material and said retaining means are, over at least part of their length, connected together.
• In a further aspect of the present invention, there is provided a set of instruments for the repair of damaged tissue present at or on the surface of bone in an animal, including a human being, the set comprising means for forming a narrow groove around at least part of said damaged tissue, which groove extends into bone below the damaged tissue, means for removing damaged tissue around which the groove extends, and means for anchoring retaining means to the bone so as to retain replacement material at the site from which the damaged tissue has been removed.
• Typically, the groove can be made with a, straight or curved punch or with an oscillating saw. It will be apparent to one skilled in the art that the use of an oscillating saw enables the surgeon to make geometric cuts around the damaged tissue thus minimizing the damage to healthy tissue. For example, and not by way of limitation, the surgeon can make a series of angular cuts around a damaged area to surround the damaged tissue. Typically, this results in damaged tissue being sectioned by a polygonal series of cuts as depicted inFIG. 14.
• Preferably, the means for forming the narrow groove is a reaming device.
• Typically, the damaged tissue can be excised using a scraping device as depicted inFIGS. 4 and 5. Alternatively, or preferably, the damaged tissue is removed using a wire brush,FIG. 9. The use of a wire brush has advantages over the use of a scraping device. Firstly, the abrasive nature of a wire brush although effective at removing damaged cartilage does not have the propensity to damage the underlying bone, which does occur when using a scraping device. Secondly, the wire brush method of removal of tissue promotes tissue re-growth by slight damage to blood vessels in the underlying bone. This promotes local angiogenesis and tissue regrowth.
• An alternative to the use of a wire brush to promote angiogenesis is shown inFIG. 16. Typically the device is a cylindrical rod at the end of which numerous needles are attached. The head including the needles is pressed against the subchondral plate to prick the bone plate at numerous sites and thereby result in a uniform distribution of angiogenesis over the repair site.
• Preferably the wire brush is provided with guide means to restrict the abrasive action of the brush to the area of damaged tissue.
• In situations where a scraping device is used to remove damaged cartilage, it is advantageous to use guard means to prevent the scraping device damaging surrounding healthy cartilage. Typically, a guard means is located in the groove to abut the scraping device during removal of the damaged cartilage. A guard means is manufactured from any robust, tensile materials to confer protection (e.g. steel, high density plastics).
• A further alternative means to remove damaged tissue is a device which comprises a rotatable cutting head comprising a plurality of cutting edges, the cutting head being rotatable relative to a support member which supports the cutting head. An example of such an implement is illustrated inFIG. 17.
• In the embodiment shown inFIG. 17, the instrument consists of a cutting head that is mounted on the end of a shank, the cutting action is achieved by rotating the shank while the head is moved over cartilage surface and while applying pressure onto the cutting head. The head has a substantially flat end with sharp edged grooves that are formed by making holes in the head in a perpendicular direction to the axis of rotation and by machining of an appropriate amount of material from the end. The end of the instrument being flat skids over the hard and relatively un-deformable surface of the underlying bone (without damaging it), when the instrument reaches the bony surface, after it has removed the cartilage layer.
• Alternatively the cutting bead is attached directly to a handle which imparts rotational movement on the cutting head. It will be apparent that the rotational movement can be imparted either by provision of a suitable motor or by simple hand rotation of the handle or shank.
• The device illustrated inFIG. 17 can be adapted to provide an implement which can be used as a means to stimulate angiogenesis. The rotating head has a substantially flat end with a few pins protruding above the surface by around 1 mm or less. This instrument could be used after the removal of cartilage from the defective site as described above. The bone scoring instrument would then be brought into contact with the bone and rotated while being moved under pressure, for a short period during which adequate scoring of the bone can be achieved. An illustration of such a device is shown inFIG. 22.
• Preferably the anchoring means comprises a tubular device for pushing the retaining means, in the form of a thin mesh, into the groove. Alternatively, if the groove conformation is polygonal the anchoring means is suitably adapted to facilitate the securing of the retaining means. For example, such anchoring means can be a straight edged blade.
• In a further aspect of the present invention, there is provided a replacement element for the repair of damaged tissue present at or on the surface of bone in an animal, including a human being, said element comprising a pad of bio-compatible material shaped and dimensioned to occupy a site from which the damaged tissue, or a part thereof, has been removed.
• It will be apparent to one of skill in the art that a replacement element can comprise tissue (e.g. cartilage, periosteum, bone, synovium) or synthetic material. Alternatively, the replacement element can be fluid or gel injected into the recess after removal of damaged tissue. It will also be apparent that combinations of natural tissues and synthetic materials may be advantageously utilized to repair damaged regions. The replacement element or implant may form part of a larger sheet of bio-compatible material which is located on a backing sheet, the element being defined in the sheet and being readily removable therefrom. Preferably the larger sheet includes a covering layer.
• In a further aspect, the present invention provides a replacement kit for the repair of damaged tissue present at or on the surface of bone in an animal, the kit comprising at least one replacement element of the invention and means anchorable to the bone so as to retain the replacement element at a site from which damaged tissue has been removed, said retaining means being capable of anchoring location within a groove formed in the bone about said site.
• The replacement kit may include the set of instruments of the invention as well as at least one replacement element and the retaining means.
A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
• The accompanying drawings are as follows:
• FIG. 1 illustrates cartilage repair by a method of the present invention;
• FIG. 2 shows a reamer which is one of the instruments used in the present invention;
• FIG. 3 illustrates the operative site after use of the reamer ofFIG. 2;
• FIG. 4 illustrates in section the use of a scraper forming one of a set of instruments of the present invention;
• FIG. 5 is a plan view of part of the operative site shown inFIG. 4;
• FIG. 6 shows the use of a tubular pusher which is another of the set of instruments of the present invention;
• FIG. 7 illustrates repair of various sizes and shapes of damaged cartilage;
• FIG. 8 illustrates cartilage repair using another embodiment of the present invention;
• FIG. 9 illustrates a side view of a wire brush device and guide means for removal of damaged tissue;
• FIG. 10 illustrates cartilage repair of a larger damaged region;
• FIG. 11 illustrates the combined repair of both cartilage and bone tissue;
• FIG. 12 illustrates an integral pad/retaining means;
• FIG. 13 illustrates an implement used in the application of a pad and retaining means to a region to be repaired;
• FIG. 14 illustrates an alternative groove arrangement;
• FIG. 15 illustrates a plurality of pads comprising replacement material for use in tissue repair;
• FIG. 16 illustrates an implement from piercing the subchondral bone plate to stimulate angiogenesis;
• FIG. 17 illustrates an alternative implement for removal of damaged tissue which comprises a handle, shank and cutting head which includes a plurality of cutting edges;
• FIG. 18 illustrates a side view of the cutting head;
• FIG. 19 illustrates a further side view of the cutting head;
• FIG. 20 illustrates a yet further side view of the cutting head;
• FIG. 21 illustrates the removal of cartilage using the implement shown inFIG. 17; and
• FIG. 22 illustrates an implement for stimulating angiogenesis at a site to be repaired.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
• The invention will now be further described, with reference to the accompanying drawings, and by way of examples only.
• Referring toFIG. 1 of the accompanying drawings, there is illustrated part of a knee joint1 includingbone3 overlaid withcartilage5. The method of the present invention involves the formation of an annular space orgroove7 which extends through the cartilage and into the bone terminating within the bone at a level that is a multiple of cartilage depth, for example, four or five times the depth of the cartilage.
• Removal of the damaged cartilage from the area of bone defined by thegroove7 results in a space into which is located a small piece or pad ofbiocompatible material9.Pad9 is shaped and dimensioned to occupy substantially the whole of the space previously occupied by cartilage and the depth ofpad9 corresponds approximately to that of the surroundingcartilage5.
• FIG. 12 shows an alternative pad arrangement. In this example the pad and retaining sheet form an integral unit which facilitates application to an area to be repaired.
• The groove illustrated inFIG. 1 is circular in form. Alternative forms are envisaged. For example,FIG. 14 shows a polygonal groove arrangement. It will be apparent that pads of replacement material are adapted to account for differences in groove arrangement.
• Pad9 is made of a non-woven fabric of a bio-enhancing material which is designed to encourage cell recruitment at a level many times that of untreated material.
• Pad9 may also be bio-absorbable at a rate which is designed to match that of the establishment of a new cartilage layer which is secured to the underlying bone and the surroundingcartilage5.
• Gene therapy involves the transfer and stable insertion of new genetic material into cells for the therapeutic treatment. Stem cells or pluripotent progenitor cells are suitable targets for gene transfer because the various progeny lineages produced by these cells will potentially express the foreign gene.
• Some studies in gene therapy have focused on the use of haematopoietic stem cells. High efficiency gene transfer systems for hematopoietic progenitor cell transformation have been investigated for use (Morrow, J F, 1976, Ann, NY Acad. Sci. 265:13; Salzar, W et al, 1981 in Organization and Expression of Globin Genes, A R Liss, Inc, New York, p 313; Bernstein A 1985 in Genetic Engineering: Principles and Methods, Plenum Press, New York, p 235; Dick J E et al. 1986, Trends in Genetics 2:165). Viral vector systems indicate a higher efficiency of transformation than DNA-mediated gene transfer procedures (e.g. CaPO₄precipitation and DEAE dextran) and show the capability of integrating transferred genes stably in a wide variety of cell types. Recombinant retrovirus vectors have been widely used experimentally to transduce hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells.
• Methods of gene transfer include microinjection, electroporation, liposomes, chromosome transfer, and transfection techniques (Cline M J 1985, supra). Salser et al used a calcium-precipitation transfection technique to transfer a methotrexate-resistant dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) or the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene, and a human globin gene into murine hematopoietic stem cells. In vivo expression of the DHFR and thymidine kinase genes in stem cell progeny was demonstrated (Salser W et al., 1981 in Organization and Expression of Globin Genes, Alan R Liss, Inc, New York, pp 313-334).
• As an alternative, theprosthetic material9 may be seeded naturally with cells from the joint after the operation.
• It may be a useful step in the cartilage repair procedure described, to seed the non-woven pad with autologous cells from the patient, for example, chondrocytes, fibroblasts, stem cell progenitor cells of chondrocytes or fibroblasts. The source of these would be the residual cartilage at the defect site which is removed with the rotatory instrument. A fraction of the cartilage residue will be healthy cartilage. On removal of this residue, it is proposed to decimate it further with tissue disrupting devices which are known in the art or any mechanical or chemical means which can effectively release healthy chondrocytes, fibroblasts or stem cells. A non-limiting example of such a device would be a dounce homogenizer.
• With the addition of the appropriate medium to the decimated cartilage removed from the repair site, the result would be a cell suspension into which the repair pad can be soaked for a period after which the pad is implanted according to the invention. The tissue disrupting device can be used with alternative tissue such as synovium harvested from the patient and used in the same manner, except that in this case the cells seeding the pad would be synovial fibroblasts instead of chondrocytes. The advantage of the above is that autologous cells would be used and therefore not rejected by the patient. The use of the pad ensures that much of the cells remain in the site of repair. It is envisaged that the cells would proliferate resulting in inducing tissue that fills the pad in a faster manner than if the latter was not seeded.
• Once thematerial9 has been positioned at the site from which the damaged tissue has been removed, a piece of thin netting/mesh ortissue11 is then located in the position illustrated inFIG. 1.Mesh11 extends over thepad9 and into theannular groove7 into which it is a push-fit. Thuselement11 is a mesh also made of a bio-absorbable material, again calculated to be eliminated at a rate compatible with the growth and fixation of the new cartilage to both the bone and the surrounding cartilage.Element11 may also be non-woven fabric of a bio-enhancing material, or alternatively can be a piece of tissue, (e.g. periosteum, synovium, fascia, retinaculum).
• If cartilage is to be repaired,pad9 may be supplied in the form of a larger sheet of the same material into which various sizes and shapes of cut-outs have been formed by means of a laser cutting or another suitable means (e.g. stamp, water jet). The shapes chosen are those that are easy to generate or cut using standard instruments. A small cartilage defect is best repaired using a circular reamer with a thin wall having cutting teeth. For an irregular shape, it is preferred to use a plurality of prosthetic elements, each being of a simple shape such as a circle, a crescent or a segment of a circle. These are closely packed to cover the entire repair area.
• In an alternative arrangement, repair is effected at a damaged area by the use of at least two concentrically reamed grooves, as illustrated inFIG. 10. This requires the use of two replacement elements and at least one retaining sheet. A circular pad of replacement material is applied to the inner concentric circle and a ring-shaped pad is applied to the outer concentric circle. Once in place, each of the pads is secured with at least one retaining sheet.
• As indicated above, the prosthetic material may form part of a larger sheet which includes a covering or capping layer. The material itself is in the form of a thin layer of a non-woven fabric of a suitable scaffold material which has sufficient strength to be pushed into the circular space previously occupied by the damaged tissue. Typically the material is made of randomly arranged fibers. In the above described embodiment the material is a bio-absorbable material. However in another embodiment the material may be a non-degradable material which is bio-compatible and possesses enhanced surface properties so as to attract tissue growth into the material.
• The prosthetic pads themselves can be provided in the form of discs of varying thickness so that the prosthetic scaffold chosen may be of a matching thickness to the adjacent cartilage. As indicated above, it may be supplied in marquetry form with the elements being peeled off when required from a suitable substrate which may be made of, for instance, card. Accordingly the surgeon can select the appropriate elements, including first and subsequent elements, to fill an irregular defect.
• The material of the prosthetic elements is the same as that of the covering sheet. The structure is loopy, or random, and stabilized with a bio-compatible adhesive at the sites where the filaments of the material cross or by the entanglement of the filaments.
• Referring toFIG. 2 of the accompanying drawings, the operative procedure involves the use of areamer15 which is in the form of a circular cross-section tube having atoothed edge17 at one end. Thereamer15 is provided with a thin steel rod (e.g. Kirschner wire)19 having located near one end acylinder21 of external diameter such that it is a snug fit withinreamer15.Adjacent cylinder21,steel rod19 has apointed end23 enablingrod19, and its associatedcylinder21, to act as a guide for thereamer15. In use, thepointed end23steel rod19 is located at the centre of the site which includes the damaged cartilage tissue. Light pressure is applied to the steel rod.Reamer15, located aroundsteel rod19 andcylinder21, while being rotated with, for example a power drill, is then subjected to relatively heavy pressure to cut an annular groove which extends through the cartilage and into the bone, as indicated inFIG. 1.
• FIG. 3 of the accompanying drawings shows the position after use ofreamer15. Anannular groove25 extends throughcartilage27 and intobone29 to a depth that is a multiple of the cartilage thickness. In this case theannular groove25 encompasses the defect site and the surrounding cartilage is healthy.FIG. 11 illustrates an instance where both cartilage and bone tissue is repaired. Prior to application of the pad, replacement material is added to damaged bone. Repair of bone tissue can be with bone, (solid or pulverized), coral, or synthetic bone material.
• Referring toFIGS. 4 and 5 of the accompanying drawings, there is illustrated removal of cartilage from the area defined bygroove25. In order to effect this cartilage removal, ametallic guard31 of part-circular cross section is introduced into thegroove25 so as to protect surroundinghealthy cartilage27. Ascraper device33 is then used to effect the removal of the cartilage by causing this tool to penetrate through the cartilage layer and then moving it in a direction towardsguard31.
• As stated above, damaged tissue can be removed through the abrasive use of a wire brush as depicted inFIG. 9. The use of a wire brush as an alternative to the scraping device shown inFIGS. 4 and 5 is advantageous since it is less likely to damage the underlying bone. The brush is provided with a guide means which restricts the movement of the brush to the region of damaged tissue thereby preventing unintentional damage to surrounding healthy tissue.
• The implement shown inFIG. 17 is a yet farther device which can be used to remove damaged tissue.FIG. 17 shows an implement comprising ahandle60 which extends into ashank61 to which is rotatably mounted a cuttinghead62 comprising a plurality of cutting edges63. Alternatively the cutting head can be rotatably mounted on the handle.
• In use the cutting action is achieved by rotating the shank while the head is moved over cartilage surface and while applying pressure onto the cutting head. The head has a substantially flat end with sharp edged grooves that are formed by making holes in the head in a perpendicular direction to the axis of rotation and by machining of an appropriate amount of material from the end.
• This instrument is particularly suitable for cutting into a soft material such as cartilage particularly when removing it from the underlying bone causing minimal or no damage to the latter. Referring toFIG. 21, as the instrument is pressed against cartilage, the latter being soft, bulges within the groove and is then subject to the cutting action of the sharp edge of the groove. The material removed escapes side-wards through the groove, as illustrated inFIG. 21. The end of the instrument being flat thus skids over the hard and relatively un-deformable surface of the underlying bone (without damaging it), when the instrument reaches the bony surface, after it has removed the cartilage layer.
• In cases of a single repair site, it would be preferable to use a short reamer, which, on completing the groove can be left in situ to act as a guard for the brush during removal of cartilage from the defect site.
• Referring toFIG. 6 of the accompanying drawings, once the damaged cartilage has been removed, aprosthetic pad35, of a shape appropriate to fill the space previously occupied by the damaged cartilage, is located in that space. A further instrument in the form of atubular pusher37 is then used to anchor the prosthetic pad to thebone29.Tubular pusher37 has a wall thickness sufficiently thin to enable it to be pushed intogroove25. Before this is effected, a circular sheet of fabric netting39 (made of non-woven fabric) of a diameter of several times that ofpad35, is laid over the pad so that it extends also over the surrounding healthy cartilage.Pusher37 is then introduced intogroove25 carrying with it the outer part of netting39.Pusher37 is moved farther intogroove25 until the outer edge of netting39 is pushed fully intogroove25. Thepusher37 is then removed leaving the netting39 jammed intogroove25. The netting39 will maintain thepad35 in place until such time as the pad, whether formed of prosthetic material or ultimately of new cartilage, is itself secured both to theunderlying bone29 and to the surroundinghealthy cartilage27. The covering sheet fabric may have holes to allow bone and tissue to grow throughout, within the groove thus securing the covering sheet further.
• FIG. 13 shows an alternative use of thepusher37. In this embodiment thepusher37 is loaded with a pad and retaining sheet prior to application to the groove. This is particularly suited to the integral pad/retaining sheet ofFIG. 12 and advantageously expedites the application and retention of the pad to a site of repair. The retaining sheet is held in position with a ring that can slide along the pusher as this is used to implant the pad in the repair site and introducing the retaining sheet in the annular groove. Thus, by loading the pusher with the implant and retaining sheet it can be supplied to the surgeon in a sterile package, which, on being opened by the surgeon, can be readily used with no need for any further handling by the surgeon. Further, this particular method of packaging would make facilitate implanting the device through small incisions such as those made in arthroscopic or arthroscopically assisted procedures.
• The method of the present invention can be applied in connection with a cartilage defect that is confined to an area less than that of a single circular pad. If the defect is large and/or irregular, it can be dealt with by means of a plurality of pads in the shape of circles, ellipses, crescents or other simple shapes. When securing non-circular pads in position, a pusher can be used that, in section, is part circular, for instance, half circular, quarter circular, etc.
• FIG. 7 illustrates the use of a single pad which has an, area greater than the whole of the defect area (FIG. 7A).FIG. 7B illustrates the use of acircular pad41 and an adjacent crescent-shapedpad43.FIG. 7C illustrates the use of an-elliptical pad45 as well as a crescent-shapedpad47. In practice, the surgeon will choose whichever combination of pads most effectively covers the defect area.
• It is feasible accordingly to resurface a substantial area of a knee bone if required.
• Referring toFIG. 8 of the accompanying drawing, there is illustrated another embodiment of the present invention. In this case anentire bone plug51, which includes the damaged cartilage, is removed from the bone. Aprosthetic pad53, (to which apply the same attributes ofpad9 previously described), is located on the bone plug in place of the damaged cartilage and an openweave retaining mesh55 is located around the entire bone plug and pad, thereby securing thepad53 to thebone plug51. The bone plug is then repositioned within the bone as shown inFIG. 8. The annular space created between the bone plug and the remaining bone is then occupied by the retainingmesh55. The bone plug and the host bone will unite through themesh55.
• Referring toFIGS. 16 and 22, devices are illustrated which can be used to stimulate angiogenesis at a site of repair.FIG. 16 shows acylindrical rod64 which is provided with a plurality ofneedles65 which can be used to pierce the subchondral plate to promote angiogenesis.FIG. 22 shows a device similar in structure to the device inFIG. 17 but with the cutting head replaced with a rotatinghead66 which is provided at least oneprojection67 fixed to a substantiallyflat surface68. Typically, the projections are approximately 1 mm in height. The application of the rotatinghead66 to a tissue surface which has been cleaned of damaged tissue produces an abrasive effect on the bone to score the surface thereby stimulating angiogenesis.
• It will be apparent to one skilled in the art that the removable nature of the rotable heads62 and66 is advantageous in so far as replacement heads can be easily and quickly exchanged. Thehandle60 orshank61 can be adapted such that new, unused heads can be fixed to the upper portion of the implement thereby providing a compact storage for the heads which also protects the heads from physical damage.

Claims (21)

1. A replacement element for the repair of damaged tissue present at or on the surface of bone in an animal, including a human being, said element comprising:

a pad of bio-compatible material to provide a prosthetic scaffold for the growth of tissue and shaped and dimensioned to occupy a site from which the damaged tissue, or a part thereof, has been removed, the pad configured to allow migration of cells from surrounding tissue into the site;

characterised by:

a retaining sheet configured to retain the pad at the site, wherein the pad and the retaining sheet are manufactured from non-woven material.

2. The replacement element according toclaim 1 wherein when the pad is positioned substantially centrally at the retaining sheet, the retaining sheet extends away from the pad by a distance at least equal to the edge to edge distance across the pad.

3. The replacement element according toclaim 1 wherein the pad and retaining sheet are integral.

4. The replacement element according toclaim 1 wherein at least a region of the pad and the retaining sheet are connected together.

5. The replacement element according toclaim 1 wherein said bio-compatible material is tissue selected from cartilage, periosteum, bone, and synovium.

6. The replacement element according toclaim 1 wherein said bio-compatible material is a synthetic bio-compatible sheet, fluid or gel.

7. The replacement element according toclaim 1 forming part of a larger sheet of bio-compatible material which is located on a backing sheet, the pad being defined in the sheet and being readily removable therefrom.

8. The replacement element according toclaim 7 wherein the larger sheet includes a covering layer.

9. The replacement element according toclaim 1 wherein the replacement pad is in the form of a circular, crescent-shaped, ring shaped or part circular pad.

10. The replacement element according toclaim 1, wherein the replacement pad is bio-absorbable and bioenhanced.

11. The replacement element according toclaim 1, wherein the replacement pad is non-bioabsorbable and bioenhanced.

12. The replacement element according toclaim 1, wherein the replacement pad is seeded with cells selected from chondrocyte, fibroblasts, mesenchymal progenitor cells, endosteal cells, periosteal cells, or inducible chondroprogenitor cells in extraskeletal organs.

13. The replacement element according toclaim 12, wherein the cells are derived from tissue material removed from the site to be repaired.

14. The replacement element according toclaim 12, wherein said seeded cells are genetically engineered.

15. The replacement element according toclaim 1, wherein the retaining sheet is in the form of a thin, flexible mesh.

16. The replacement element according toclaim 1, wherein the retaining sheet comprises woven fabric, or non-woven fabric, with holes for tissue and bone in growth.

17. The replacement element according toclaim 1, wherein the retaining sheet comprises tissue.

18. The replacement element according toclaim 17 wherein said tissue is selected from periosteum, synovium, fascia, or retinaculum.

19. The replacement element according toclaim 1, wherein said replacement pad and said retaining sheet are non-integral.

20. A replacement kit for the repair of damaged tissue present at or on the surface of bone in an animal, the kit comprising at least one replacement element according toclaim 1 wherein the retaining sheet is anchorable to the bone so as to retain the pad at the site from which damaged tissue has been removed, said retaining sheet being capable of anchoring location within a groove formed in the bone about said site.

21. The replacement kit according toclaim 20 wherein the kit is sterile and disposable.

Images