CROSS REFERENCESReference is made to DD 596,606 filed Mar. 16, 2006 by the inventor.
INTRODUCTIONThis invention relates generally to a new technology application used in recovery of heavy and viscous hydrocarbons from subterranean oil bearing formations during hot fluid injection. The technology described is the Single Well Acceleration Production process, herein abbreviated as SWAP which allows a single wellbore to perform simultaneously, injection and production operations in heavy oil recovery systems.
This invention is related to prior filings by the same applicant, pertaining to the overall recovery of hydrocarbons from subterranean oil formations. The technology involves the novel use and application of equipment and techniques in which steam or other hot fluids are injected into substantially horizontal wellbores in which injection and production is obtained from the same wellbore.
One of the new types of horizontal well is called a Uniwell™ because it can have at least two surface wellheads one at each end of the axis of the horizontal system. Either wellhead can be used for either injection or production as needed by the operator.
The technology has been the subject of several prior applications by the same inventor. This particular invention relates to use of a specialized annular fluid communication zone between the steam zone and the production zone and the additional use of a downhole apparatus to selectively monitor flowing fluid characteristics and subsequently control hot oil production in order to facilitate the injection of steam into the steam bank zone. This control mechanism effects oil displacement by maintaining a viable hydraulic seal in the communication zone between the steam displacement zone and the production zone of the wellbore.
This novel completion technique uses injection and production perforations separated by a moveable wellbore packer and this new apparatus is implemented between the injection and production perforations in the wellbore to sense and monitor the flow of steam and control the production of hot oil.
FIELD OF INVENTIONTHIS INVENTION is a unique new approach to heavy oil recovery combining horizontal and lateral wells, steam injection and specialized downhole devices to facilitate operations and to significantly accelerate oil production.
The invention is particularly suited to making heavy oil formations, oil shales and tar sands producible by a single wellbore drilled using a specialized form of horizontal directional drilling. The invention however is not limited to recovery of heavy oils only; it can be used for many oil recovery processes such as tar sands and oil shales.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION1. Introduction
Heavy hydrocarbons in the form of petroleum deposits are distributed worldwide and the heavy oil reserves are measured in the hundreds of billions of recoverable barrels. Because of the relatively high viscosity, up to a million cp, these crude deposits are essentially immobile and cannot be easily recovered by conventional primary and secondary means. The only economically viable means of oil recovery is by the addition of heat to the oil deposit, which significantly decreases the viscosity of the oil and allows the oil to flow from the formation into the producing wellbore. Today, the steam injection can be done in a continuous fashion or intermittently as in the so-called “huff and puff” or cyclic steam process. Oil recovery by steam injection involves a combination of physical processes including, steam distillation, gravity drainage, steam drive and steam drag to move the heated oil from the oil zone into the producing wellbore.
Horizontal wells and lateral wells have played a prominent part in recovery of oil. These wells can be as much as 4 times as expensive to drill as conventional vertical wells but the increased expenses are offset by the increases in rates of oil production and faster economic returns. Several patents have described various approaches to using horizontal wellbores. The need for horizontal wells requires a more efficient economical and easily deployable system for developing, drilling and utilizing these horizontal wells. The need to accelerate oil production without waiting for steam to traverse several hundred feet of reservoir rock between injection and production wells has created this new technology. In this technology an approach is used wherein oil production occurs almost simultaneously with steam injection initiation.
2. Prior Art
Various methods and processes have been disclosed for recovery of oil and gas by using horizontal wells. There have been various approaches utilized with vertical wellbores, to heat the reservoirs by injection of fluids and also to create a combustion front in the reservoir to displace the insitu oil from the injection wellbore to the production wellbore.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,986,557 claims a method using a horizontal well with two wellheads that can inject steam into a tar sand formation mobilizing the tar in the sands. In this patent, during the injection of the steam it is hoped that the steam will enter the formation and not continue directly down the open wellbore and back to the surface of the opposite wellhead. It is technically difficult to visualize the steam entering a cold formation with extremely highly viscous oil, while a completely open wellbore is readily available for fluid flow away from the formation. Furthermore, U.S. Pat. No. 3,986,557 teaches that the steam is simultaneously injected through perforations into the cold bitumen formation while hot oil is flowing in the opposite direction against the invading high pressure steam through the same perforations through the rock pore structure. This situation is not only physically impossible but it thermodynamically impossible for the steam fluid to flow out of, and hot oil flow back into the same perforations simultaneously.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,994,341 teaches a vertical closed loop system inside the wellbore tubulars in which a vertical wellbore is used to generate a vertical circulation of hot fluids which heat the wellbore and nearby formation. Hot fluids and drive fluids are injected into upper perforations which allow the driven oil to be produced from the bottom of the formation after being driven towards the bottom by the drive fluid.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,034,812 describes a cyclic injection process where a single wellbore is drilled into an unconsolidated mineral formation and steam is injected into the formation for a period of time to heat the viscous petroleum near the well. This causes the unconsolidated mineral sand grains to settle to the bottom of the heated zone in a cavity and the oil to move to the top of the zone.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,037,658 teaches the use of two vertical wells connected by a cased horizontal shaft or “hole” with a flange in the vertical well. This type of downhole flange connection is extremely difficult if not impossible to implement in current oilfield practice. Two types of fluids are used in this patent, one inside the horizontal shaft as a heater fluid and one in the formation as a drive fluid. Both fluids are injected either intermittently or simultaneously from the surface wellheads.
Butler et al in U.S. Pat. No. 4,116,275 use a single horizontal wellbore with multiple tubular strings internal to the largest wellbore for steam recovery of oil. Steam was injected via the annulus and after a soak period, the oil is produced from the inner tubing strings. This approach is basically a modified “Huff & Puff” displacement in which the injection “huff” is done through a complex pre-heated horizontal well bore and the well put on production, the “puff” cycle after a soak period of several days. In other patents, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,085,803, 4,344,485, 5,407,009, 5,607,016, Butler describes further uses of horizontal wells, solvent type and steam displacement mechanisms to produce viscous oils from tar sands using his SAGD technology.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,445,574 teaches the drilling of a single well with two wellheads. This well is perforated in the horizontal section and a working fluid is injected into the wellbore to produce a mixture of reservoir oil and injected working fluid. Similar to the U.S. Pat. No. 3,986,557 patent it is difficult from a hydraulic point of view to visualize and contemplate the working fluid entering the formation in a vertical direction while an open wellbore is available for fluid flow horizontally and vertically out the distal end of this wellbore.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,532,986 teaches an extremely complex dual well system including a horizontal wellbore and a connecting vertical wellbore which is drilled to intersect the horizontal well. The vertical well contains a massively complex moveable diverter system with cables and pulleys attached to the two separate wellheads to allow the injection of steam. This system is used to inject steam from the vertical wellhead into the horizontal wellbore cyclically and sequentially while the oil is produced from the wellhead at the surface end of the horizontal well.
Huang in U.S. Pat. No. 4,700,779 describes a plurality of parallel horizontal wells used in steam recovery in which steam is injected into the odd numbered wells and oil is produced in the even numbered wells. Fluid displacement in the reservoir occurs in a planar fashion.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,167,280 teaches single concentric horizontal wellbores in the hydrocarbon formation into which a diffusible solvent is injected from the distal end to effect production of lowered viscosity oil backwards at the distal end of the concentric wellbore annulus.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,215,149 Lu, uses a single wellbore with concentric injection and production tubular strings in which the injection is performed through the annulus and production occurs in the inner tubular string, which is separated by a packer. This packer limits the movement of the injected fluids laterally along the axis of the wellbores. In this invention, the perforations are made only on the top portion of the annular region of the horizontal well. Similarly, the production zone beyond the packer is made on the upper surface only of the annular region. These perforated zones are fixed at the time of well completion and remain the same throughout the life of the oil recovery process.
Balton in U.S. Pat. No. 5,402,851 teaches a method wherein multiple horizontal wells are drilled to intersect or terminate in close proximity a vertical well bore. The vertical wellbore is used to actually produce the reservoir fluids. The horizontal wellbore provides the conduits, which direct the fluids to the vertical producing wellbore.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,626,193 by Nzekwu et al disclose a single horizontal well with multiple tubing elements inside the major wellbore. This horizontal well is used to provide gravity drainage in a steam assisted heavy oil recovery process. This invention allows a central injector tube to inject steam and then the heated produced fluids are produced backwards through the annular region of the same wellbore beginning at the farthest or distal end of the horizontal wellbore. The oil is then lifted by a pump. This invention shows a process where the input and output elements are the same single wellbore at the surface.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,655,605 attempts to use two wellbores sequentially drilled from the surface some distance apart and then to have these horizontal wellbore segments intersect each other to form a continuous wellbore with two surface wellheads. This technology while theoretically possible is operationally difficult to hit such a small underground target, i.e the axial cross-section of a typical 8-inch wellbore using a horizontal penetrating drill bit. It further teaches the use of the horizontal section of these intersecting wellbores to collect oil produced from the formation through which the horizontal section penetrates. Oil production from the native formation is driven by an induced pressure drop in the collection zone by a set of valves or a pumping system which is designed into the internal concentric tubing of this invention. The U.S. Pat. No. 5,655,605 patent also describes a heating mechanism to lower the viscosity of the produced oil inside the collection horizontal section by circulating steam or other fluid through an additional central tubing located inside the horizontal section. At no time does the steam or other hot fluid actually contact the oil formation where viscosity lowering by sensible and latent heat transfer is needed to allow oil production to occur.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,708,764 provides a description of an undulating well bore. The undulating well bore includes at least one inclining portion drilled through the subterranean zone at an inclination sloping toward an upper boundary of the single layer of subterranean deposits. At least one declining portion is drilled through the subterranean zone at a declination sloping toward a lower boundary of the single layer of subterranean deposits. This embodiment looks like a waveform situated in the rock formation.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,725,922 utilizes a plurality of horizontal wells to drain a formation in which a second set of horizontal wells are drilled from and connected to the first group of horizontal wells. These wells from a dendritic pattern arrangements to drain the oil formation.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,729,394 proposes a method of producing from a subterranean formation through a network of separate wellbores located within the formation in which one or more of these wells is a horizontal wellbore, however not intersecting the other well but in fluid contact through the reservoir formation with the other well or wells.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,948,563 illustrates that increases in permeability may result from a reduction of mass of the heated portion due to vaporization of water, removal of hydrocarbons, and/or creation of fractures. In this manner, fluids may more easily flow through the heated portion.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,951,247, 6,929,067, 6,923,257, 6,918,443, 6,932,155, 6,929,067, 6,902,004, 6,880,633, 20050051327, 20040211569 by various inventors and assigned to Shell Oil Company have provided a very exhaustive analysis of the oil shale recovery process using a plurality of downhole heaters in various configurations. These patents utilize a massive heat source to process and pyrolize the oil shale insitu and then to produce the oil shale products by a myriad of wellbore configurations. These patents teach a variety of combustors with different geometric shapes one of which is a horizontal combustor system which has two entry points on the surface of the ground, however the hydrocarbon production mechanism is considerably different from those proposed herein by this subject invention.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,953,087 by Shell, shows that heating of the hydrocarbon formation increases rock permeability and porosity. This heating also decreases water saturation by vaporizing the interstitial water. The combination of these changes increases the fluid transmissibility of the formation rock in the heated region.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,896,928 teaches a “dumb” downhole fluid flow control device that is electrically operated from either the surface or downhole. This device is a simple on-off device, which restricts flow, but is unable to determine, process and operate based on the sensible characteristics of the flowing fluid such as the current invention discussed herein.
A further U.S. Pat. No. 5,868,201 illustrates a downhole system that senses pressure and that actuate a valve system for control of the fluid flow remotely. Similar to U.S. Pat. No. 5,896,928 this system is unable to operate based on the sensible characteristics of the flowing fluid as is needed in the case of steam, flow where pressure is a minor parameter in determining flow regimes.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,006,832 discusses a formation sensor system for monitoring a producing formation in-situ by using permanently mounted sensors in the wellbore. These sensors monitor formation properties using gamma ray, neutron and resistivity sensors. These type sensors are passive and measure rock and interstitial fluid properties needed to discriminate rock types and properties. On the other hand, the present invention herein senses flow parameters and properties needed for flow control.
Patent application 20050072578 describes a thermally controlled valve. This thermally controlled valve is a device that is capable of regulating the flow of material into, through, and out of a wellbore in response only to a change in temperature near the valve. All of the subsequent systems related to the valve operation depend on the temperature behavior and its measurement. In steam operations where there is a need to regulate steam flow in porous media such as injection and production in subterranean heavy oil formations, there is an indispensable requirement to determine the total characteristics of the flowing material. A simple temperature record is insufficient to determine whether flow is a gas, a liquid or a solid. To fully describe what fluid is flowing one needs the temperature, pressure and quality in the case of steam. The 20050072578 application does not address this fact and as such is incapable of discriminating between hot oil, hot water and steam in the flow stream and will be inadequate as a controller of steam flow and a reliable steam shut off mechanism as is needed in heavy oil field steam displacement processes.
The Society ofPetroleum Engineers Reference 1, SPE paper 20017 teaches a computer simulation of a displacement process using a concentric wellbore system of three wellbore elements and complex packers in which steam is injected in a vertical wellbore similar to that in the U.S. Pat. No. 3,994,341 patent. Simulated steam injection occurs through one tubing string and circulates in the wellbore from just above the bottom packer to the injection perforations near the top of the tar sand. This perforations near the top of the tar sand. This circulating steam turns the wellbore into a hot pipe which heats an annulus of tar sand and provides communication between the steam injection perforations near the top of the tar sand and the fluid production perforations near the bottom of the tar sand. This process requires an injection period of 7 years to increase oil production from 20 BOPD to 70 BOPD.
Paper 37115 describes a single-well technology applied in the oil industry which uses a dual stream well with tubing and annulus: steam is injected into the tubing and fluid is produced from the annulus. The tubing is insulated to reduce heat losses to the annulus. This technology tries to increase the quality of steam discharged to the annulus, while avoiding high temperatures and liquid flashing at the heel of the wellbore.
SPE paper 50429 presents an experimental horizontal well where the horizontal well technology was used to replace ten vertical injection wells with a single horizontal well with limited entry. The limited-entry perforations enabled steam to be targeted at the cold regions of the reservoir.
SPE paper 37089 presents an experimental SAGD study in which the lower horizontal well functions as an intermittent steam-injector and a continuous oil-producer, instead of the usual SAGD production-well while steam is also injected continuously through the upper well.
SPE paper 50941 presents the “Vapex” process which involves injection of vaporized hydrocarbon solvents into heavy oil and bitumen reservoirs; the solvent-diluted oil drains by gravity to a separate and different horizontal production well or another vertical well. SPE paper 53687 shows the production results during the first year of a thermal stimulation using dual and parallel horizontal wells using the SAGD technology in Venezuela.
SPE paper 75137 describes a THAI—‘Toe-to-Heel Air Injection’ system involving a short-distance displacement process, that tries to achieve high recovery efficiency by virtue of its stable operation and ability to produce mobilized oil directly into an active section of the horizontal producer well, just ahead of the combustion front. Air is injected via a separate vertical or a separate horizontal wellbore into the formation at the toe end of different horizontal producer well and the combustion front moves along the axis of the producer well.
SPE 14916 describes the problem of the dual horizontal wells in a formation with a horizontal shale barrier. This barrier slows down the recovery under the SAGD system of dual horizontal wells since the steam bank formation is slowed by the shale. This analysis also confirms that the gaseous steam overrides the cold viscous crude zone as it is injected into the reservoir. SPE paper 78131 published an engineering analysis of thermal simulation of wellbore in oil fields in western Canada and California, U.S.A.
SPE paper 92685 describes U-tube well technology in which two separate wellbores are drilled and then connected to form a single wellbore. The U-tube system was demonstrated as a means of circumventing hostile surface conditions by drilling under these physical obstacles.
SPE 54618 and SPE 37115 describe and illustrate a series of heavy oil production mechanisms. They describe a “technically challenging” process whereby in single well gravity drainage process steam is injected into the “toe” or distal end of a horizontal well while oil is produced at the “heel” or proximal end. This system is similar to other approaches in the prior art and has a serious drawback in that neither investigator describes how the backwards flow from the “toe” to the “heel” can occur under reservoir conditions with the extremely viscous in-situ oil. There is no viable mechanism for the hot oil to travel to the producing point at the heel. However, in this subject application, this conceivably insurmountable obstacle is overcome by implementing a communication zone which forms an active channel between the growing steam bank and the downstream production zone.
Reference 2 shows conclusively that the gravity drainage effect is the most critical factor in oil recovery in heavy oil systems undergoing displacement by steam.
Very few of these prior art systems, except the SAGD and Huff & Puff processes, have been used in the industry with any success because of their technical complexity, operational difficulties, and being physically impossible to implement or being extremely uneconomical systems.
For example, in U.S. Pat. No. 3,994,341, this patent which although on the surface it has several similar aspects of the invention herein, differs significantly since, the U.S. Pat. No. 3,994,341 patent forms a vertical passage way only by circulating a hot fluid in the wellbore tubulars to heat the nearby formation, the U.S. Pat. No. 3,994,341 patent claims the drive fluid promotes the flow of the oil by vertical displacement downwards to the producing perforations at the bottom, the U.S. Pat. No. 3,994,341 patent teaches the production perforations are set at the bottom of the vertical formation, a distance which can be several hundred feet. In this U.S. Pat. No. 3,994,341 embodiment, since no control mechanism like a back pressure system or pressure control system is taught, it is obvious that the high pressure drive steam, usually at several hundred psi, will preferentially flow down the vertical passageway immediately on injection and bypass the cold formation with its highly viscous crude and extremely low transmissibility. Secondly, the large distance between the top of the formation and the bottom of the formation will cause condensation of the drive steam allowing essentially hot water to be produced at the bottom with low quality steam, both fluids being re-circulated back to the surface. In addition, the mechanism to heat the near wellbore can only be based on conductive heat transfer through the steel casing. There is ineffective heat transfer since there is no direct steam contact with the formation rock in which latent heat transfer to formation fluids and rock can occur, this latent heat being the major heat transport system. The U.S. Pat. No. 3,994,341 process is incapable of delivering sufficient heat in a reasonable time to heat the formation sufficiently to lower the viscosity of the oil, raise the porosity and permeability of the formation as taught in the present patent application.
Additionally many of the downhole devices patented to control fluid flow in the downhole wellbores are designed as “dumb” systems. These so-called dumb systems simply open or close a flow device depending on an event such as a pressure level or a temperature level. None of the devices used in the heavy oil recovery system by steam to date, examine the quality of the flowing fluid in the novel communication zone to discriminate its nature and thus restrict flow based on this knowledge to maintain a hydraulic seal.
In steam operations where there is a need to regulate steam flow in porous media such as injection and production in subterranean heavy oil formations, there is an indispensable requirement to determine the total characteristics of the flowing material. A simple temperature record is insufficient to determine whether flow is a gas, a liquid or a solid. To fully describe what fluid is flowing one needs the temperature, pressure and quality in the case of steam. The prior art applications do not adequately address this fact and as such are incapable of discriminating between hot oil, hot water and steam in the flow stream and will be inadequate as controllers of steam flow and thereby reliable steam shut off mechanisms as are needed in heavy oil field steam recovery operations.
The most significant oil recovery problem with heavy oil, tar sands and similar hydrocarbonaceous material is the extremely high viscosity of the native hydrocarbons. The viscosity ranges from 10,000 cp at the low end of the range to 5,000,000 cp at reservoir conditions. The viscosity of steam at injection conditions is about 0.020 cp. Assuming similar rock permeability to both phases steam and oil, then the viscosity ratio provides a good measure of the flow transmissibility of the formation to each phase. Under the same pressure, gradient, gaseous steam can therefore flow from 500,000 to 250,000,000 times easier through the material than the oil at reservoir conditions. Because of this viscosity ratio, it is imperative and critical to any recovery application that the steam be confined or limited to a continuous 3-dimensional volumetric zone in the reservoir by a seal. This seal can be physical, hydraulic or pneumatic and essentially must provide a physical situation which guarantees no-flow of any fluid across an interface. This can be implemented by several means. Without this “barrier” the steam will bypass, overrun, circumvent, detour around the cold viscous formation and move to the producer wellbore. This invention addresses and resolves this major obstructive element in heavy oil recovery by implementing a hydraulic seal at the bottom of the steam bank and in the communication zone.
There is a long felt need in the industry for a means of moving the heated low viscosity crude oil that has been contacted by the steam in the steam zone to a place or location where it can be produced without having to move it through a cold heavily viscous oil impregnated formation. This problem has continued to baffle the contemporary and prior art with possibly the only exception being the SAGD patent which uses two horizontal wellbores closely juxtaposed in a vertical plane. Even this SAGD approach has inherent difficulties in initiating the hot oil flow between the two wellbores. Trying to push the hot oil through a cold formation is an intractable proposition.
In a much-reported SAGD process that has been used extensively in Canada, there are other shortcomings that limit the efficacy of the process and which have been overcome in this subject invention. It is well known that the SAGD production well must be throttled to maintain the production temperature below the saturation steam temperature to allow a column of fluid to exist over 100% of the production well to minimize bypass of steam. In some situations, in this very operation the newly injected steam comes into the formation at the lower end of the steam bank. It then passes vertically through the overlying hot oil and hot water re-heating this mixture repeatedly which must be kept cool to prevent bypassing of steam; this is called the “sub-cool” effect. In essence, this thermodynamically inefficient process is analogous to running an air conditioner and a heater simultaneously to maintain a room at a fixed temperature. Further, even though the SAGD tries to utilize a limited hydraulic seal as is described in this subject invention, the implementation in this subject patent application is more precise, more operationally efficient and does not provide any detrimental effects on the overall steam process. Having to inject the steam through existing hot oil and water uses up part of the latent heat of the steam which is critical to good reservoir heating and effective oil displacement. This heat loss lowers the overall recovery of the process. In the subject process there is no operational loss of latent heat since the hot oil-water leg is at the bottom of the steam bank and the communication zone and steam is injected directly into the native formation above and not through the oil-water accumulation zone with no loss of heat energy.
There are flow control issues that are inherent in the SAGD process that are not present in the SWAP process invented herein. In the SAGD process the operator has to critically control the steam flow rate along the complete length of the SAGD injection wellbore. This wellbore can be several thousand feet in length as it is drilled substantially horizontally, however any deviation from the horizontal of the producing wellbore provides a potential zone where the steam can break through from the higher injector and “short circuit” the recovery process by producing steam in the lower producer. Maintaining precise horizontal separation as well as the same azimuth, between two lateral wellbores over several hundred feet and more than a thousand feet, is not easy and as such the SAGD process puts higher initial capital costs and difficult and stringent long term operational demands on the recovery process. On the other hand the SWAP process presented herein only needs to control the vertical flow in an axial communication zone over a distance of a few feet. This control is easily performed by the hydraulic seal which fills the communication zone and extends upwards into the bottom zone of the steam bank in much the same way as a heavy fluid can rest at the bottom of a kitchen sink over a plugged sink drain while a lighter fluid remains above. Because of the large volumetric extent of the steam bank encompassing several thousand barrels, production of the accumulated fluids at the bottom of the steam bank can occur for a substantial time before the level of the hydraulic seal is lowered by a few feet. For example, lowering a one acre steam bank one foot can deliver about 1,200 barrels of hot oil and water into the wellbore. This slow lowering of fluid levels allows efficient control of the production process and limits the potential of steam break through into the production wellbore.
A further aspect of the SAGD process is pointed out by in SPE 97647 in which the XSAGD process is described. SPE 97647 teaches that since under SAGD it is impossible to move the injector and producer wells farther apart vertically, to minimize steam breakthrough, this constraint necessitates a lowering of oil production rates as the steam bank grows. However in the present SWAP invention taught herein, the communication zone allows the distance between the injector locations (perforations) and producer locations (perforations) to be constantly changed as needed to meet the expanding steam bank zone dimensions and this implementation allows the new invention to maintain a more level rate of high oil production without any steam breakthrough and in many cases to increase steam injection and consequently oil production as the operations develop and the steam bank contacts a larger volume of reservoir rock.
Another aspect of the SAGD process inefficiency is the need to inject steam in both injection and production wells for periods up to 415 days to “pre-heat” the reservoir and create a communication zone between the two wellbores. In this subject invention as soon as a viable steam bank zone develops in a matter of days, hot oil begins to accumulate in the communication zone at the bottom of the steam bank and can be produced. Economically such a long delay can severely impact the economics of a capital project.
Another negative aspect of this SAGD process is the capital needs for drilling and equipping two horizontal wells to implement the SAGD process. Furthermore, the SAGD process requires a vertical separation between these two horizontal wells and this property limits the SAGD process the relatively thick pay sections and cannot be used in thin reservoir sections. A yet further limitation of SAGD is the effects of water zones at the base of the oil formation on the SAGD process since the steam preferentially enters the water zone and bypasses the cold viscous oil zones. This limits the thermal and economic efficiency of the SAGD process. A yet further problem associated with the SAGD process is the presence of horizontal shale barriers in the oil formation. This shale layer between the horizontal wellbores is in effect a vertical barrier and the SAGD process as designed and implemented is unable to operate since the two horizontal wells are unable to communicate.
Additionally, to increase displacement efficiency in thermal recovery operations, there is a need to discriminate the quality of flowing fluid in the communication zone in a manner that allows the operator to open or shut off the production stream and allow the accumulated fluid to behave as an effective hydraulic seal thus propagating the steam displacement in the steam bank. The subject invention offers a solution to this need and provides the mechanism by which the solution can be implemented using conventional equipment and procedures.
Shortcomings of prior art can be related a combination of effects. These include:
- (1) the inability of the process to inject the hot fluid into a cold highly viscous oil in a limited conductivity formation with hydrocarbon viscosities in excess of 106 cp, with this viscosity the liquid is essentially immobile at reservoir temperature.;
- (2) the inability of the method to prevent bypass of injected fluid directly from the injector source towards the producing sink;
- (3) the inability of the method to form and maintain a viable communication zone from the steam zone or chamber to the producing sink while simultaneously preventing bypass and early breakthrough of steam;
- (4) the inability of the process to utilize the very effective gravity drainage flow component created by the low density of the hot steam compared to the relatively high density condensed water and hot oil;
- (5) the inability of the process to heat the formation effectively by physical contact between the steam and the rock formation such that latent heat, the major source of steam heat energy, can be transferred to the rock and hydrocarbons efficiently;
- (6) the requirement of long lead times of months to years of hot fluid injection, before there is any measurable production response of the displaced oil in the production wells;
- (7) the inability of the existing technology to maintain and sustain oil production rates when applied to large patterns of several wells;
- (8) the inability of the downhole devices to determine flowing fluid characteristics other than temperature;
- (9) the inability of the technology to discriminate between flowing hot oil, hot water and steam in the flowing material;
- (10) the inability of the devices to operate based on the knowledge gained form these fluid characteristics;
- (11) finally the use of overly complex equipment of questionable operational effectiveness to implement the process in the field.
The above discussed and other problems and deficiencies of the prior art are overcome or improve upon by the heavy oil recovery system of the present invention by integrating a viable steam bank, an axial and concentric communication zone, an active hydraulic seal, a sensible downhole controller and an operative production system.
In contrast to the aforementioned prior art which try to measure fluid temperatures, or pressures in the wellbore the present invention determines the true nature of the fluid flowing, be it steam, hot oil, hot water or a combination of each fluid. This real time measurement is required since to adequately identify the steam flow a measure of steam quality must be made in real time to allow the controller to shut off the oil production inflow from the steam bank
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONTHIS NEW INVENTION provides an improvement in heavy oil recovery whereby the operator injects a hot displacing fluid into a specially designed well. An additional implementation is the development of an integral downhole apparatus which behaves as a flow sensor, flow controller and a flow valve simultaneously. Operationally this device provides for flow-or-no-flow of produced fluids depending on the type of fluid detected in the produced flow stream. If the flow is hot oil or water the flow device is opened, when steam is detected the valve is closed. In this application the term flow valve and flow device are used interchangeably for a physical element used to control fluid flow.
In this oil recovery method, the operator drills a well which is drilled from the surface down to the producing formation. There are several embodiments of the well ranging from single vertical wellbores, to combined vertical and horizontal wells and to the uniwell system which has two wellheads.
An object of this invention is to provide an improved process for recovery of heavy oils and similar hydrocarbons from subterranean formations. The invention uses a single well bore with an external annular communication zone between the perforations. In this invention, the accumulation of hot oil and condensed water at the bottom of the steam bank and in the vertical communication zone forms a secure controllable hydraulic seal which prevents steam flow bypass away from the steam bank. An isolation packer vertically separates injection and production perforations.
In one embodiment, the external annular communication zone can be implemented by an additional tubular string outside of the injection and production tubular string. The perforations for flow into and out of the wellbores are in the walls of the steel wellbore casings. In this embodiment, the annular region is a void with infinite permeability. In another embodiment, an open-hole communication zone can be implemented. Depending on the rock formation and oil reservoir properties, the communication zone can range from a few inches to several feet in diameter.
The displacing fluid is forced into the upper perforations by a downhole packer and as steam accumulates heats up and displaces native oil this oil and condensed water gravitate to the bottom of the steam bank and collects in the communication annulus waiting to be produced when the downhole controller opens the flow control valve. In this invention, the flow-no-flow operation permits oil and water production but shuts down when steam flow is detected in the flow stream.
An object of this invention is to provide an improved process for recovery of heavy oils and other highly viscous hydrocarbons from subterranean formations by exploiting the advantages provided by gravity drainage in the displacement process of heavy oils in porous formations using steam driven displacement processes. The use of a modified single well bore with coupled pairs of injector-producer perforations in close proximity under positive and viable flow control has several engineering benefits including cost reduction, better fluid displacement and more engineering control and accelerated economic recovery of the injection and oil recovery process.
Another specific objective is to provide a means whereby the same wellbore perforations along the vertical section of the wellbore can be used sequentially for either injection or production as reservoir oil depletion occurs during steam field operations as required by the operator.
Another specific objective is to use the movable packer between the injection and production perforations, which forces the steam to exit the wellbore and enter the oil zone at a preset location upstream of the production perforations.
Another specific objective is after the initial oil region is depleted, to unseat and move the movable packer between the injection and production perforations and the accessory downhole flow controller apparatus a preset distance along the axis of the wellbore and reseat them to allow the steam displacement process to continue throughout the reservoir in a new undepleted or virgin oil zone.
Another specific objective is to provide a concentric communication channel in the formation, which allows the heated oil to move from the upper steam zone to the production perforations in the lower production zone rapidly and under gravity.
Another specific objective is to provide a means to considerably reduce the distance the heated oil has to move through the producing formations from the steam injection point to be produced in the wellbore.
Another specific objective is to provide a means whereby oil production begins as early as possible during the injection process compared to existing technologies like Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) and conventional Thermal Enhanced Oil Recovery (TEOR), where oil production takes place after a considerable length of steam injection ranging from several weeks to several months and even years.
Another specific objective is to utilize and incorporate the lateral steam gravity over-ride characteristics of the steam drive process to enhance the “backwards” flow of hot oil from the leading edge of the steam displacement front to the hot oil accumulation zone and the communication zone in the invention.
Another specific objective is to utilize a set of staggered lateral mini-wellbores drilled into the oil formation to maximize the injection efficiency of the steam so that a steam override effect is implemented such that a lateral physical flow gradient occurs in the oil zone with a thin leading edge and a thicker trailing edge. The hot oil flows along this three-dimensional surface at the steam-oil interface.
Another specific objective is to allow the steam to replace oil and to pressure up the steam bank at the top, which helps to displace low viscosity, heated oil downwards along the interface of hot steam and cold reservoir oil via the communication annulus, to the producing perforations where there exists a localized pressure sink because oil is being removed during production.
Another specific objective is to use a downhole steam controller apparatus to control the flow, no-flow of steam under specific operational conditions.
Another specific objective is to use an operatively connected valve apparatus to shut off the flow of produced fluid in the wellbore when the steam sensor indicates that steam break-through has occurred and that steam is flowing down the annular region from the steam bank to the production perforations.
Another specific objective is to monitor operations such that hot oil is produced until continuous steam breakthrough is imminent then close the downhole production valve.
Another specific objective is to control the downhole apparatus from the surface.
Another specific objective is to utilize a scavenging displacing fluid to recuperate part of the residual hot oil in the heated oil formation by injecting this displacing fluid after the steam injection phase is complete.
This novel utilization proposed herein addresses the needs and teaches a method and apparatus that is easily implemented, allows a larger portion of the reservoir to be exposed and allows more heavy oil recovery to occur sooner.
Improvements have been made in enhancing the contact of the steam with the native heavy oil by the introduction of horizontal well technology, which allows greater recovery than with the customary vertical wells. This current invention provides a further extension of the horizontal technology in which a novel well completion methodology is applied to the recovery effort to allow wells of much larger lateral extent, potentially larger diameters and thereby more efficient recovery systems.
By implementing the new method which is taught in this application by this invention the oilfield operator can see improved performance, lower costs, better oilfield management, and allow for efficient and orderly development of petroleum resources.
THIS NEW INVENTION provides an improvement in the recovery methods and operations of other applications wherein the process of steam injection was controlled by a downhole apparatus forming a closed seal, which prevents the production of fluids except under certain field conditions and which on sensing the flow of steam shut off the production fluid flow completely.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGSThe present invention consists of the wellbore and associated components shown in the figures below:
FIG. 1aShows a schematic of the new downhole apparatus implemented in a uniwell™ system. It shows the steam bank, the injection and production perforations, annular communication zone and the accumulated hot fluids in the wellbore.
FIG. 1bShows a schematic of a lateral wellbore with the new downhole apparatus implemented in the lateral system. This implementation can connect the lateral to a central production cavity.
FIG. 1cShows a vertical well embodiment with a central production cavity below the wellbore. The steam downhole apparatus is implemented in the inner wellbore as shown.
FIG. 2 Shows the steam zone, the communication zone and the accumulated hot fluids in the steam bank. Also shown is the downhole steam controller installed between the injection and production perforations and also shown is the direction of flow of the steam and the hot oil as they move down the communication zone into the wellbore. This figure depicts a closed system in which the downhole apparatus is closed so that no production occurs.
FIG. 3 Shows a schematic of the new downhole steam controller apparatus illustrating the various component locations. The steam sensor, the packer seal, the valve controller, the shut off valve and the flow of steam and hot fluids around and through the apparatus.
FIG. 4 Shows a schematic of the new downhole apparatus implemented in the wellbore. It also shows the fluid level at the bottom of the steam bank and the flow direction for hot fluid entering the device.
FIG. 5 Shows a schematic of the new downhole apparatus illustrating the device in a closed no-flow condition.FIG. 6 Shows a schematic of the new downhole apparatus illustrating the device in an open flow or producing condition.
FIG. 7aShows a schematic of system operating with the new downhole apparatus in the closed position with the hot fluids accumulating to form a hydraulic seal at the bottom of the steam zone. Note the elevated level of the steam-hot fluids interface.
FIG. 7bShows a schematic of system operating with the new downhole apparatus in the open position with the hot fluids draining, thus lowering the hydraulic seal level at the bottom of the steam zone and allowing the hot oil and water to enter the production cavity. Note the lower level of the steam hot fluids interface.
FIG. 8 Shows a flow chart of the operations during injection and production.
FIG. 9a,9b,9c,9dShow 4 flow charts illustrating the sequence of the operations of the invention.
FIG. 10 Shows a graphic of the typical temperature viscosity behavior of an oil sands oil.
FIG. 11 Shows a schematic of the development of the steam bank during injection in a system in which a series of horizontal shale barriers occur in the oil formation.
FIG. 12 Shows a schematic of the scavenging phase in which water is injected at the bottom of the formation as the displacing fluid in separate wellbores after steam injection has depleted the oil formation. Also shown is the growth sequence overlay I, II, III, IV, V, VI of the steam zone.
FIG. 13 Shows a schematic of the scavenging phase in which a non-condensing gas is injected at the top of the formation as the displacing fluid in separate wellbores after steam injection has depleted the oil formation. Also shown is the growth sequence overlay I, II, III, IV, V, VI of the steam zone.
FIG. 14 Shows a schematic of the wellbore system with a set of staggered horizontal mini-wellbores implemented to allow steam injection forming a “wedge” shaped profile.
| No. | Item |
| |
| 1 | Wellbore |
| 2 | DownholeSteam Control Apparatus |
| 3a | Steel casing forwellbore |
| 3b | Steel casing or Liner for annular reamedzone |
| 4 | Steam bank inOil Formation |
| 5 | Oil bearing formation |
| 6a | Hot oil flowing |
| 6b | Non FlowingHot Oil |
| 7 | PrimarySteam Diverter packer |
| 8 | Annular Communication Zone |
| 9a | Injection perforations | |
| 9b | Perforations inCased Liner |
| 10a | Production perforations ininner wellbore |
| 10b | Production perforation inouter wellbore |
| 11 | Communication element |
| 12 | Injected Steam Flow down wellbore |
| 13 | Top ofFormation |
| 14a | High Level - Hot Fluids - accumulatingphase |
| 14b | Low Level - Hot Fluids - producingphase |
| 15 | Flow Device (Valve) inDownhole apparatus |
| 16 | Slotted Liner forfluid inflow |
| 17 | Steam in Steam Bank andAnnular region |
| 18 | Flow sensor |
| 19 | Flow Valve Controller |
| 20 | Hot oil gravitating downsteam bank |
| 21a | Wellbore packer - internal |
| 21b | Wellbore packer - external |
| 22 | Bottom ofFormation |
| 23 | Steam andHot oil interface |
| 24 | Steam Flow direction |
| 25 | SurfaceSteam Generation System |
| 26 | WellHead |
| 27 | Production Tubing |
| 28 | Production Pump |
| 29 | Production Cavity |
| 30 | Land surface |
| 31 | Surface control devices |
| 32 | Wellbore forScavenger water fluids |
| 33 | Surfacewater injection facilities |
| 34 | Injection lines |
| 35 | Wellbore for Scavenger ono-condensinggases |
| 36 | Surface apparatus fornon-condensing gases |
| 37 | InjectedWater |
| 38 | Injectednon-condensing gas |
| 39 | Shale barriers |
| 40 | Mini-wellbores |
| |
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT OF THE INVENTIONReferring now to the drawings, wherein like elements are numbered alike. Referring toFIG. 1a,specialized wellbore1 is drilled from the surface down to and into thehydrocarbon bearing formation5. Many drilling rig configurations can be used, regular vertical type rigs or slant type rigs can be used to implement the drilling phase. In field applications of this invention it is beneficial that the wellbores be oriented along the formation dip angle such that maximum effect of gravity can be obtained in that the dip component adds to the gravity component and increases the gravity segregation of the fluids because of density differences. There are several embodiments of the wellbore system as shown inFIGS. 1a,1b,and1c.One of the many embodiments includes a uniwell system with two wellheads shown inFIG. 1a,and a second is a lateral wellbore which can be extended as shown inFIG. 1bto intersect a central production cavity, and third a vertical wellbore with a production cavity shown inFIG. 1c.These three options do not exhaust the available forms and anyone skilled in the art can implement similar or diverse systems for completing a similar wellbore. A significant novel improvement to the wellbore flow system is implementation of an annularfluid communication zone8 shown inFIGS. 1a,1band1c.This is a zone of increased fluid conductivity which is concentric to thewellbore1 and forms an effective flow channel from thehot steam zone4 to the lower producing zone of the wellbore system. This communication zone allows early gravity separation of the steam, hot oil and hot water. This early precipitation of the heavier and denser fluid components of the reservoir frees up formation pore space allowingmore steam17 to be injected into thecold formation5 and thereby heating the porous medium and increasing thesteam zone4 growth and attendant oil recovery. It is imperative that the steam has a free pore space to enter the formation without which, fluid displacement is impossible at the typical operating fluid flow pressures. In practice, the annular zone is implemented in one embodiment by asteel casing3binstalled outside theinner wellbore3a.In the industry, this is generally done when the well is drilled. A steel liner or a steel screen can also be used to form the annular communication zone in another embodiment.
Operatively implemented in this wellbore and shown inFIG. 2, is a novel element called asteam controller apparatus2, which monitors and controls the flow of fluid into and through thewellbore1 below theinjection packer system7. This device is installed downstream of the injection system adjacent to theproduction perforations10 as illustrated inFIGS. 2 and 7aand7b.
As shown inFIG. 3 thesteam controller apparatus2 comprises three main segments. Aninflow section16 in which the hot fluids enter the device. An uppersteam sensor section18 which senses the flow of gaseous steam through the device, acontroller section19, which monitors the steam flow and which controls thelower valve section15 which opens and closes the flow pathway to allow flow or shut off the flow of hot liquids as needed. Both elements have a complement of electronic hardware and software as shown inFIG. 8. It is noted herein, that thedevice2 has to detect steam flow which is more complex than just recording or monitoring a fluid flow or a flow temperature. Theapparatus2 is implemented in thewellbore1 wherein the device is placed between theupper injection perforations9a,9band thelower production perforations10a,10b.Theapparatus2 is anchored in a manner typical to the industry and easily accomplished by those skilled in the industry. In its initial placement in the wellbore, as shown inFIG. 5 andFIG. 7a,the apparatus is set up in a closed state such that no flow enters theproduction perforations10. The no-flow situation allows the accumulation of hot fluids to occur in thecommunication zone8 and the bottom of the hotsteam bank zone4.
Referring toFIG. 2, thesteam injection fluid17, which is generated on the surface in asteam generation system25 is injected into thespecialized wellbore1. Thesteam fluid17 is injected down the wellbore and is directed into the cold viscousoil bearing formation5 by theupper packer7. Thesteam17 enters theformation5 through theperforations9ain theinner casing3a,strategically placedexternal packers21bprevent loss of steam down the annulus. This steam then enters through theperforations9bof theouter casing3b.In theformation5, it heats up the formation rock, the interstitial water and the native oil, significantly lowering the oil viscosity as shown inFIG. 10 from hundreds of thousands of centipoises to tens of centipoises and forming a steam bank orsteam chamber4. Because of the significant fluid density differences, the hot fluids, oil and water preferentially accumulate at the bottom of thissteam chamber4 under gravity drainage. It should be noted that as the steam injectedvolumes17 move into the farther reaches of thereservoir5, the steam profile appears as an inverted wedge, i.e. flat at the top and triangular on the bottom side, because the steam flows more rapidly at the top of the formation and this override as reported by many researchers, creates a physical flow gradient at the lower surface of thesteam bank4. Thissteam bank4 is vertically thinner at the front or leading edge and thicker at thenear wellbore1 region. This phenomenon allows the hot oil to literally flow downhill and backwards through the porous formation towards the bottom of thesteam bank4 where it collects and further into thecommunication zone8. It is also noted that this flow phenomenon occurs in 3-dimensions since thesteam bank4 in all respects behaves like an inverted dome with the base being flattened and the walls of the dome being the flow surface for hot oil and water. As shown inFIG. 2, a gas cap, literally asteam cap17 develops at the top of the production interval and an oil andwater leg14a(high fluid level),14b(low fluid level) develops at the bottom of the zone. This is a stable hydrodynamic situation and the accumulatedhot fluids14a,14bbehave as a plug at the bottom of the hot zone and prevents steam from moving down thecommunication zone8. Theinterface23 is a horizontal plane of density differences between the gas zone and the hot oil and water zone. The accumulated hot fluids create ahydraulic plug14a,14b,which prevents the steam from bypassing the cold formation and traveling downwards to the production perforations. This plug behaves much like a P-trap in a plumbing system. The invention is designed such that thehot oil6, condensed water and free steam are forced to flow down the annularconductive zone8 from the injection zone to the production zone. As shown inFIGS. 4,7a,7b,these hot fluids flow down thecommunication zone8 from the injector zone andsteam bank4 to the production zone andproduction perforations10a,(in inner wellbore),10b(in outer wellbore). This hydraulic plug is actively controlled by the levels of oil production of the well and other operational actions under the direction and control of the well operator. Hot fluid entersperforations10bin the outer wellbore casing and then flows into theannular cavity8 whence it enters throughperforations10ainto theinnermost wellbore1 and contacts theinput section16 of thesteam controller device2. This newsteam controller device2 allows hot water and hot oil to flow but avalve15 shuts off flow when steam is detected in the flow stream. Substantial flow of steam indicates that there is no more oil to be produced from the formation.
In the field, the presence of horizontal shale barriers in the oil zone as shown inFIG. 11 has always been a major obstacle to developers in the prior art. Thebarriers39 lower the efficiency of the displacement processes in view of the fact that they provide an almost impenetrable vertical barrier to steam and oil flow. This invention however, addresses and overcomes this major problem by the implementation of the verticalannular communication zone8 at thenear wellbore1 region. The presence of thisvertical communication zone8 acts as a vertical relief valve for oil flow. In the displacement operations as shown herein earlier, thehot oil6a,being displaced, will move counter-current, under gravitational flow, backwards along the shale barrier towards the wellbore because of the 3-dimensional characteristics of the steam bank in which the leading edge is always thinner than the trailing edge. At thenear wellbore1 region the communication zone allows vertical cross flow of the hot oil and hot condensed water towards the bottom of the wellbore and the collection and production systems. The hydraulic seal at the bottom of the steam bank has to be controlled to limit steam bypassing in both layers.
This vertical cross-flow resolves the problem created by the shale barriers. In the field, there may be a plurality of shale barriers shown inFIG. 11, and the same phenomenon will occur simultaneously in all the steam displacement layers because the oil flow occurs along the surface of the steam bank interface with cold reservoir oil and the hot steam, and is not driven by pressure gradients but by the density differences of the two fluid phases.
Referring toFIG. 14 in which a series of lateral orhorizontal mini-wellbores40 are drilled radially from theinitial wellbore1 to increase steam injection efficiency. In this embodiment, the mini-boreholes40 they are drilled in a staggered pattern such that a wedge-like cross-section of the steam bank is obtained whensteam17 is injected. This cross-section wedge is thicker at the near wellbore region and thinner at the leading or front edge of thesteam17. This type of profile provides a physical flow system in which thehot oil20 can flow backwards more readily to the bottom of thesteam bank4 and the axialconcentric communication zone8. Thesemini-wellbores40 can be predrilled through out theoil formation5 at specific vertical depths prior to the steam injection process. In this way when the injection system is moved axially down themain wellbore1 thesepredrilled mini-wellbores40 are already in place and available for steam injection and can also aid in hot oil inflow to thecommunication zone8.
Referring toFIGS. 5,6 which show that except under specific conditions, thesteam control apparatus2 prevents the flow ofhot fluids6athrough theproduction perforations10a,10b.When the hot fluid flow is allowed, the hot fluid comprising oil and condensed steam enters thewellbore1 and flows down the well to the collection system and thepumping mechanism28 of the producing system. As the fluid flows into thesteam controller apparatus2, sensing components in the device shown inFIG. 8, detect the presence of steam. When steam is detected, the apparatus shuts off fluid flow as illustrated inFIG. 5 since there is no more oil to be produced at the current time. However, continuous steam injection still occurs in the wellbore in the upperinjection zone perforations9aand the accumulation of hot oil at the bottom of thesteam zone4 continues. After a predetermined time as computed by the well operator in which sufficient oil has accumulated, the apparatus reopens the production phase to allow thehot oil6a(flowing),6b(non-flowing) to be produced. Production of oil and water occurs when thedownhole pump28 is activated and the accumulatedoil14a,14bin the wellbore is produced in the customary manner used in the industry. If the downhole pressure is sufficient, it is possible to flow the oil directly to the surface.
Thissteam controller apparatus2 along with thewellbore packers21a,21bare sequentially moved down thewellbore1 and reseated in a new axial location as the steam injection process continues until the recoverable oil in theformation5 is depleted. In one rudimentary embodiment of the invention, adownhole sensor18 is not utilized but theflow control apparatus19 is turned on and off to open theflow valve15 at selected times for specific producing time intervals. This “dumb” approach using a “null” sensor can be used in situations where the sensors are unavailable. A further option of the “dumb” approach is to flow the wells in the producing cycle until steam is visible at thesurface30 then to shut off thedownhole valve15 such that the hydraulic seal created by fluid14a,14bcan start re-forming. These embodiments are wasteful of steam energy and reservoir productivity however, they can still function under the prevailing reservoir conditions and in operating conditions where the low cost of steam generation makes it economically attractive, examples are in some remote foreign environments where environmental concerns on combustion processes for steam generation are not as stringently regulated. An alternative approach to using the “null” sensor uses historical data analysis to correlate statistically, injection and production times such that an intelligent estimate of the required production time before steam breakthrough occurs can be made. In this way, the “dumb” approach can be more effective and lessen injected steam waste.
Power to thedownhole apparatus2 can be implemented by thepower cable11 and information back and forth from the downhole apparatus to the surface can be effected by either a wired or wireless telemetry system. Both systems are typical to the industry and can be done by anyone competent in the field. Optical fibers are a well-developed communications medium used in the telecommunications industry and have been progressively adopted for uses in sensors in the oil and gas industry. One of the greatest benefits of these sensors is the high temperature capability and reliability, which makes them well suited for steam injection and other thermal recovery processes. These fiber optic systems are intrinsically safe since they only transmit light and no electrical flow occurs which completely removes the possibility of a spark to ignite the volatile hydrocarbons in the wellbore.
As shown inFIG. 3 and further illustrated inFIGS. 5,6,8, thedevice2 comprises the following elements. Aninlet section16 which is generally a slotted liner or a metal sieve to allow the hot fluids to enter the device. Thefluid sensor18 comprises a steam flow sensor for example, a mass flow detector which is minimally capable of determining in realtime the mass of flowing fluid as well as the temperature, pressure and quality of the flow stream. Thissensor18 has its own logic and computer capability to process the data and make it available to other elements of thesteam controller2 and thesurface devices31. In addition operatively connected to thesensor system18 is a flowdevice controller system19. Thisflow device controller19 has a full complement of hardware circuitry, software and software logic, memory and storage capabilities to process, store, transmit and implement the instructions needed to control the operations of theflow valve15 directly or on command from thesurface devices31 as seen inFIG. 8. The flow valve orflow control device15 is a system typical of the flow devices in industry and are made in a variety of forms. Thesevalve systems15 are well known in the industry and are actuated in a variety of ways. Implementation of the combination of steam sensor, controller and flow valve as a means of limiting steam flow through an axial communication zone below an operating steam bank provides a new means of accelerating production from a single well. This single well accelerated production or abbreviatively called SWAP™ technology provides for accelerated economics in the enhanced oil recovery industry.
Operationally the preferred embodiment of the invention is practiced as shown by the following: Referring toFIG. 9a,step110 illustrates the drilling phase of the field application. In this phase, the operator selects the type of well(s) that should be drilled. These types are shown inFIGS. 1a,1b,1c,andFIG. 14 in the case of staggered horizontal or lateral mini-wellbores being implemented. After thewellbores1 are drilled, in one embodiment, thecommunication zone8 is cased andperforations9a,9b,10a,10bare made in the tubular goods. As shown instep111,packers21aand21bare prepared and seated as needed in the wellbores when thesteam control device2 is installed in theinner wellbore1. At the same time, the operator computes the steam injection times and rates. After these specific times, the operator can monitor and operations and trigger the downholesteam control device2 to open up theflow valve15 as dictated by the flow times. Instep112, steam is generated on the surface insteam generators25, as shown inFIG. 1 InFIGS. 2 and 7a,the steam is injected down thewellbore1, and meets thedownhole packer7 which diverts thesteam flow12 as seen inFIG. 4 thorough theinjection perforations9aand9bof thesteel wellbore3aand theannular casing3b.Flow down and out of theannular zone8 is prevented bypackers21b.
In the operational case where nopackers21bare used some steam can be sacrificed to fill up the annular cavity with no great loss of efficiency. The injectedsteam17 begins to heat up thereservoir formation5, it forms a steam zone orsteam bank4 in which hot oil and hot water accumulate with the steam. The high formation temperature lowers the oil viscosity considerably as shown inFIG. 10 and this oil flow driven by the combined forces of gravity, formation dip angle and pressure in thesteam bank4, gravitates to the bottom of the zone to form a liquid saturatedzone14. This zone forms a fluid-steam contact23 in the formation similar to an oil/water contact in natural reservoirs which is formed by fluid density differences. In this invention, thesteam cap4 is analogous to a gas cap and thefluid zone14 is analogous to an oil leg in typical hydrocarbon reservoirs. As indicated instep112 this layer of hot oil andwater14a,14bforms a hydraulic seal at the bottom of the steam bank. Thishydraulic seal14 is an integral part of the invention and its existence in thesteam zone4 and thecommunication zone8 prevents the flow of steam into the wellbore until this seal height is lowered or the fluid is removed by production.
The hot dense fluids, oil and water, enter the annular communication zone throughproduction perforations10bin the casedwellbore3b.Here they remain until thesteam controller device2 “allows” them to enter theproduction perforations10aand finally theinner wellbore1. During the injection phase the steam bank grows and its growth and volumetric extent can be easily calculated by many publicly available computer simulation models. The operator as shown instep113 monitors the injection process and is able to estimate the volume of oil accumulating at the bottom of thezone4 in theoil leg14a,14b.At the pre-determined time thedownhole steam controller2 is triggered by thecontrol device31, theflow control valve15 is opened and hot fluids begin to enter theinflow section16 of thedevice2 and flow past thesteam sensor18. The steam flow sensor measures the fluid characteristics as shown insteps102,103,104,105,106,107 ofFIG. 8. As the flow continues, the level of thefluid interface23 is lowered, the fluid leg drops from a high volume at14ato a lesser volume at14bas shown inFIG. 7b.This fluid lowering occurs in thesteam zone4 and in thecommunication zone8. The produced fluids oil and water collect in the inner wellbore, are transported under gravity, and flow pressure to the production zone of the respective well systems used. These can be either into theproduction cavity29 ofFIG. 1cor the lateral wellbore ofFIG. 1a,or the central production cavity described forFIG. 1b.In all cases, theproduction mechanism28 is used to lift the oil to the surface if there is insufficient pressure from the injected fluids to lift the fluid to the surface.
As oil production continues through thesteam controller device2, the flow characteristics are monitored constantly bydevice element18 and the information is processed locally or remotely at the surface. When the sensor detects the flow oflive steam17 entering thewellbore1, thevalve controller device19 triggers thevalve15 to close and no morefluid flow6a,6bis allowed to enter thewellbore1. This operation creates a shut-off situation and hot fluid14a,14bbegins to re-accumulate in thecommunication zone8 and the bottom of thesteam zone4. This re-accumulation creates a new hydraulic seal which prevents the steam from bypassing the cold oil formation and directs it to enter theformation5 where it remains at the top of thesteam zone4. Steam injection continues at all times during the production phase.
As indicated instep114, the operator has to make a decision when the oil in the steamedzone4 is depleted. If an analysis of the cumulative oil volume produced indicates that thereservoir formations5 are economically depleted, then the heavy oil recovery operations are terminated. If however, there is still economically recoverable oil in the reservoir the injection site for steam injection through the perforations and the steam controller device must be moved axially down the length of the wellbore to a new location to exploit additional oil reserves. This translocation process is shown instep115. In thisstep115, steam injection is temporarily halted, thepackers21a,21bare unseated, thesteam controller2 is unseated and both systems are moved a calculated distance down thewellbore1 to be reseated opposite a new set of injection9—production 10 pairs of perforations.
After this re-location, all systems are re-established and steam injection continues.
This process of injection, production, decision analysis and relocation continues until the reservoir is fully depleted as shown instep116. Steam injection and production are then terminated and the displacement scavenging operations are initiated as shown instep117 ofFIG. 9d.This process is an “oil salvage” process in which displacing fluids are injected into thehot formation5 after steam displacement is complete. This is recuperative process well known in the industry in which additional oil can be recovered by flowing these displaced fluids through a hot reservoir with reduced viscosity oil. The scavenging displacement process is helped by the fact that the heated reservoir rock has a higher porosity, higher permeability and the residual oil has a lowered viscosity, all of these factors are complimentary in their effects in promoting additional recovery of in-situ oil. Field tests have shown that as much as 22% of the total oil recovered can be achieved after the scavenging process is initiated. In implementing the scavenging phase, the injected displacing fluids are injected in a plurality wellbores. These wellbores are either:
- (a) newly drilled horizontal and vertical injector wellbores; or
- (b) existing wellbores formerly used for steam injection.
Referring toFIG. 12 treatedwater37 from asurface supply source33 is injected down an injector well32 and enters the formation at the bottom of the depletedsteam bank4. In one embodiment, theseinjector wells32 can be vertical wellbores or in other embodiments, they can be substantially horizontal wellbores. Thiswater37 displaces the oil towards thewellbore1 which has all itsperforations9a,9b,10a,10bopen to allow oil flow into the wellbore driven by the water pressure and production of displaced oil and hot water occurs and is pumped to the surface.
Referring toFIG. 13 non-condensing gas or flue gas from asurface supply source36. The supply source can be the treated exhaust of thesteam generation equipment25. Thisflue gas38 is injected down an injector well33 and enters theformation5 at the top of the depletedsteam bank4. In one embodiment, theseinjector wells33 can be vertical wellbores or in other embodiments, they can be substantially horizontal wellbores. Thisgas38 displaces the oil towards thewellbore1 which has all itsperforations9a,9b,10a,10bopen to allow oil flow into the wellbore driven by the gas pressure and production of displaced oil and gas occurs and the oil is pumped to the surface. The gas can be produced up the casing annulus of the wellbore. Being less dense the injected flue gas remains at the top of the steam bank while the denser water gravitates to the bottom of thesteam bank4.
In one embodiment, both water injection and flue gas injection can occur simultaneously or sequentially. After gas and water breakthrough has occurred, injection is continued to the economic limit of the projects and then terminated as shown initem118 ofFIG. 9d.
REFERENCES- 1. SPE: The Society of Petroleum Engineers 222 Palisades Creek Dr., Richardson, Tex. 75080, U.S.A., www.spe.org.
- 2. “A Comparison of Mass Rate and Steam Quality Reductions to Optimize Steamflood Performance”,Topical Report 108, Gregory L. Messner, July 1998, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
- 3. “Fundamental Mass Flow Measurement of Solid Particles”, Tony Grift, University of Illinois, Dept of Agricultural Engineering, Urbana-Champaign. April-June 2003.
- 4. Optical Flow Meters, Photon Controls. www.photonixco.com. Photon Control, 8540 Baxter Place, Burnaby, B.C., Canada V5A 4T8
- 5. “World's first multiple fiber-optic intelligent well”, Sigurd Eriandsen, Gisle Vold, Graham Makin, World Oil, Mar. 2003, 29-32.
- 6. ISAP, Inflatable Straddle Acidizing packer System, BAKER-HUGHES, 9100 Emmott Road, Houston, Tex. 77240. www.bakerhughes.com
- 7. Heavy Oil Reservoirs.; Oilfield Review, Autumn 2002, pg. 30. C. Curtis et al. www.slb.com
- 8. USDoE Research Contract No. DE-PS26-035NT15477, Stolar Research, Raton, N.Mex.
- 9. SPE Paper No. 95713-MS,: The Use of Swell Packer's as a Replacement and Alternative to Cementing.
- 10. SPE Paper No. 78272-MS,: An Oil Selective Inflow Control System.
- 11. SPE Paper No 78946-MS, Results of Thermal Horizontal Completions with Sand Control in Lake Maracaibo, Venezuela: Case Histories of Horizontal Gravel Packs in Bachaquero-01 Reservoir.
- 12. SPE Paper No 97928-MS, Innovative Completion Technology Enhances Production Assurance in Alaskan North Slope Viscous Oil Developments.
- 13. SPE Paper No: 94808-MS, Twenty Years of Vapor Injection in Heavy-Oil Fields.
- 14. SPE Paper No: 73001-PA, Recommended Practices for Slim-Hole Steam Injectors.
- 15. SPE Paper No: 20763-PA, Injection Schedules and Production Strategies for Optimizing Steamflood Performance.
- 16. SPE Paper No: 97776-MS, Thermo-Plastic Properties of OCTG in a SAGD Application.
- 17. SPE Paper No: 97647-MS, Cross-SAGD (XSAGD)—An Accelerated Bitumen Recovery Alternative.
- 18. SPE Paper No: 89411-PA, Cruse Steamflood Expansion Case History.
- 19. SPE Paper No: 19827-PA, Oil Recovery by Gravity Drainage Into Horizontal Wells Compared With Recovery From Vertical Wells.
- 20. SPE Paper No: 56857-PA, Comparative Effectiveness of CO2 Produced Gas, and Flue Gas for Enhanced Heavy-Oil Recovery.
- 21. SPE Paper No 97336-MS, Run-and-forget completions for optimal inflow in heavy oil.