US20070038896A1

Movatterモバイル変換

Info

Publication number: US20070038896A1
Application number: US11/203,534
Authority: US
Inventors: Jonathan Champlin; Arthur Thomas
Original assignee: International Business Machines Corp
Current assignee: International Business Machines Corp
Priority date: 2005-08-12
Filing date: 2005-08-12
Publication date: 2007-02-15
Also published as: US20100064179A1; US7984334B2

Abstract

Description

BACKGROUND

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to fault detection and resolution in software-based systems.

2. Description of the Related Art

As the complexity of software-based systems increases, so too does the difficulty of identifying the source of faults, referred to as “crashes” or other anomalous behavior, within such systems. Often, when a particular software application is used across an entire organization, the same fault within the software application may be experienced by more than one user. This can lead to a significant amount of wasted time as users cope with “crashing” software applications. The possibility of data loss or corruption also exists. Presently, however, there is no reliable way of correlating software faults across an organization or to diagnose and solve the problem.

One attempted solution has been to rely upon the computer operating system to collect system and/or application execution information within a user's computer system. Upon detecting a fault condition, collected information is sent to a specified location. A typical implementation of this technique is when an application unexpectedly quits; the user is asked whether he or she wishes to send information about the fault condition. The fault information is sent as an electronic message to the manufacturer of the operating system.

This technique, however, does have disadvantages. One disadvantage is that whether information about the software fault is actually sent depends upon the user's decision to follow through with sending the information. If the user chooses not to send the information, the fault goes unreported. If the problem is widespread within a large organization, and users continually choose not to report the fault, the problem may go unnoticed for a significant period of time. As noted, this can lead to wasted time as well as possible data loss.

Another disadvantage is that even if a user chooses to send the fault information, it is provided to the operating system manufacturer. Neither the organization that is experiencing the software fault nor the developer of the software application causing the fault may be privy to the fault information. Both parties are likely to remain unaware of the frequency of any recurring software problems. As such, the problem can go unnoticed by system administrators of the organization experiencing the fault resulting in loss of productivity.

It would be beneficial to provide a mechanism for diagnosing and solving fault conditions within software-based systems which overcomes the limitations described above.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Another embodiment of the present invention can include a system for diagnosing a fault condition within software. The system can include a computing system belonging to an organization. The computing system can execute software configured to detect a fault condition and, responsive to the fault condition, automatically transmit call-stack information corresponding to the fault condition to another computer system within the organization. The system also can include a server belonging to the organization. The server can be configured to receive the call-stack information and compare the call-stack information for the fault condition with call-stack information corresponding to prior fault conditions originating from computing systems belonging to the organization. The server further can be configured to determine whether the call-stack information for the fault condition matches call-stack information from one of the prior fault conditions. If not, the server automatically can transmit the call-stack information for the fault condition to a server that does not belong to the organization for further analysis.

Another embodiment of the present invention can include a machine readable storage being programmed to cause a machine to perform the various steps described herein.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

There are shown in the drawings, embodiments that are presently preferred; it being understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown.

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating a system configured for fault detection and resolution for a software-based system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.

FIGS. 2A and 2B, taken together, are a flow chart illustrating a method of fault detection and resolution in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a method, system, and apparatus for fault detection and resolution for use with software-based systems. In accordance with the inventive arrangements disclosed herein, a two tiered approach is presented where fault conditions are first matched with prior software faults that have occurred within an organization. In the event that the fault condition does not match prior software faults, the fault condition information is sent to an evaluation system which is not part of the organization. Typically, the outside evaluation system is associated with the developer and/or entity charged with administering the software system that experienced the fault condition. In any case, the outside evaluation system can compare the fault condition information with faults that have occurred across one or more different organizations to determine whether a solution exists.

While the specification concludes with claims defining the features of the invention that are regarded as novel, it is believed that the invention will be better understood from a consideration of the description in conjunction with the drawings, in which like reference numerals have been carried forward. As required, detailed embodiments of the present invention are disclosed herein; however, it is to be understood that the disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary of the invention, which can be embodied in various forms. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a basis for the claims and as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the present invention in virtually any appropriately detailed structure. Further, the terms and phrases used herein are not intended to be limiting but rather to provide an understandable description of the invention.

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating asystem100 configured for fault detection and resolution relating to a software-based system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.System100 can include, a plurality of

computer systems

105,110, and115 as well as aserver120, communicating through acommunication network125. In addition,system100 can include anothercommunication network130, anadditional server135, and a plurality of

analyst computer systems

145,150, and155.

Computer systems105-115 can represent client and/or server computing machines which are part of, or belong to, anorganization101 such as a business, enterprise, or other entity. Each computer system105-115 can execute software which has been configured to perform various fault detection and/or diagnostic functions which will be described herein in greater detail. In one embodiment,system100 can be implemented using the Lotus Notes®/Domino® software architecture available from International Business Machines, Inc. of Armonk, N.Y. (IBM). In such an embodiment, computer systems105-115 can be configured as Lotus® Notes(& clients and/or as IBM Domino® servers.

Still, the present invention is not limited to such an implementation as the techniques disclosed herein can be applied to any of a variety of different software systems and/or architectures. Moreover, the fault detection techniques described herein can be applied to clients, servers, or both clients and servers. In addition, it should be appreciated that while only a limited number of computer systems are represented, that additional clients and/or servers can be included insystem100. Further, though hardware-based systems are depicted inFIG. 1, it should be appreciated that the terms “client” and “server” also can refer to software programs executing within suitable information processing systems.

Each of computer systems105-115 can execute application software that is configured to detect any of a variety of different fault conditions. Examples of detectable fault conditions can include, but are not limited to, access violations, memory existing in an inconsistent state, or the like. In some cases, the computer operating system can send a notification, such as an exception, to an application which indicates that a fault condition has occurred. In other cases, the application itself can detect an internal fault condition.

Despite the particular manner in which fault conditions are detected, the application software executing on computer systems105-115 can be configured to storediagnostic information140. While different types ofdiagnostic information140 can be stored or collected, in one embodiment,diagnostic information140 can include call trace information for the software application that experienced, or was responsible for, the fault condition on the computer system. Other examples ofdiagnostic information140 can include, but are not limited to information regarding open databases for crashing threads, operating system level information, application level information such as that which may be collected by an application such as IBM Lotus® Notes® or Domino®, etc. The call stack information, however, can be used for purposes of matching a fault condition with prior fault conditions to be described herein in further detail.

The computer systems105-115 further can be programmed to translate the stack trace data to call-stack information. That is, the hexadecimal stack trace information can be translated into human-readable format which specifies a list of one or more functions of the application that were called, referred to as the call-stack information. In general, the call-stack information is an ordered list of functions that were executed by the software application that experienced the fault condition in the time leading up to the fault condition, or “crash”.

When any of the computer systems105-115 of theorganization101 detects a fault condition, the diagnostic information can be transmitted to theserver120 viacommunication network125.Communication network125 can be implemented as, or include, an intranet, a wide area network, a local area network, a virtual private network, a wireless network, the Internet, and/or the like, so long ascommunication network125 represents communication pathways within, or belonging to,organization101 of which computer systems105-115 andserver120 belong or are connected.

Server

120 can be configured as a central repository for diagnostic information withinorganization101. As such,server120 can receive and storefault condition information140 from any of computer systems105-115 withinorganization101. Accordingly,server120 allows administrators withinorganization101 to view all fault condition information which has been collected across the enterprise. As shown inFIG. 1,server120 can receivediagnostic information140 fromcomputer system105 and extract call-stack information from it. The call-stack information can be compared with call-stack information corresponding to prior fault conditions from any computer system withinorganization101 to determine whether a match exists.

If no match exists, the call-stack information and/ordiagnostic information140 can be forwarded outside oforganization101 toserver135 viacommunication network130.Communication network130 can be similar to that ofcommunication network125 with the exception thatcommunication network130 includes pathways to computing resources outside of, or which are not part of,organization101 to which computers105-115 andserver120 belong.

In one embodiment,server135 can be associated with, or belong to, an entity which is responsible for maintaining and/or developing the software application that experienced the fault condition withinorganization101. In general, theserver135 can perform functions similar to those ofserver120 in that received call-stack information can be compared with call-stack information from other fault conditions.Server135, however, can include call-stack information from a plurality of different organizations making it possible to determine whether the fault condition has occurred in other organizations, i.e. outside oforganization101.

Server

135 further can routediagnostic information140 to any of a plurality of analyst computer systems145-155.Server135 can maintain a record of the diagnostic and/or call-stack information and the particular analyst to which such information was sent. Thus,server135 effectively maintains, a list of analysts and the particular fault conditions upon which each analyst is working. Accordingly, when call-stack information is received for a given fault condition, that call-stack and/or diagnostic information can be forwarded to an analyst that is already working on a similar, or same, problem, whether for the same organization or for a different organization.

FIGS. 2A and 2B, taken together, are a flow chart illustrating amethod200 of fault detection and resolution in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention. While not limited to such an implementation, in one embodiment,method200 can be performed using the system described with reference toFIG. 1.Method200 can begin in a state where application software, configured to detect fault conditions and collect diagnostic information, is executing within either a client or a server of an organization.

Accordingly, instep205, the application software can detect a fault condition. As noted, the fault condition can be detected internally within the application software, or the application software can receive a notification from the operating system of the computer system. Regardless of how the fault condition is detected, instep210, diagnostic information can be collected and/or saved. The diagnostic information can include, but is not limited to, call trace information.

Instep215, the call trace information can be translated into call-stack information within the computer system prior to transmission. Instep220, the diagnostic information, which now includes the translated call-stack information, can be sent to a centralized server within the same organization as the computer system that experienced the fault condition. Instep225, the centralized server, having received the diagnostic information, can extract the call-stack information. The call-stack information corresponding to the fault condition can be compared with call-stack information for prior fault conditions that were experienced by computer systems belonging to the organization and which also were forwarded to the centralized server.

For example, a process can execute on the centralized server where diagnostic information is sent. The process can be notified when new diagnostic information is added to a particular server repository. When diagnostic information is delivered to the server repository, a fault analysis server task can extract the call-stack information from the diagnostic information. The fault analysis server task can use pattern matching technology to determine if the new call-stack information matches any previously received call-stack information.

Thus, instep230, a determination can be made as to whether a match for the call-stack information was found. If so, the method can proceed to step235. If not, the method can continue to step245 inFIG. 2B. Continuing withstep235, an occurrence count associated with the matched, prior fault condition can be incremented within the centralized server. Incrementing the occurrence count signifies that the prior fault condition has been experienced again within the organization. By maintaining an occurrence count for each different fault condition recorded, the organization can determine those fault conditions that are problematic. It should be appreciated that time information also can be recorded for each fault condition making it possible to determine the frequency of each fault condition as well.

Step240 is optional in nature and can be performed from time to time, or upon request of a system administrator. Instep240, the fault occurrence counts within the centralized server can be analyzed to identify any fault conditions which meet one or more established criteria. In one embodiment, for example, a system administrator can establish a minimum threshold. If a count for a particular fault condition meets or exceeds the threshold, the administrator can be notified and/or the fault condition having the count which met or exceeded the threshold can be identified as one which is significantly affecting the organization and which requires attention. In other embodiments, the established criteria can serve to identify fault conditions having occurrence counts within particular ranges, or to identify a fault condition having the highest occurrence count. Afterstep240, the method can loop back to step205 to continue as may be required.

Proceeding to step245 inFIG. 2B, in the case where the centralized server within the organization did not match the call-stack information, the centralized server can send the diagnostic information and/or the call-stack information for the detected fault condition to a server that is outside of, or does not belong to, the organization. In one embodiment, the server to which the diagnostic information is sent can be associated with an entity responsible for developing and/or administering the software application that experienced the fault condition.

Instep250, the call-stack information for the current fault condition can be compared with call-stack information for prior fault conditions from one or more different organizations. It should be appreciated that if the diagnostic information is sent, that the call-stack information can be extracted from the diagnostic information within the outside server prior to performingstep250. In any case, the comparison allows the call-stack information to be compared with call-stack information for fault conditions which have occurred in a variety of different organizations.

Instep255, a determination can be made as to whether a match for the call-stack information was found. If so, the method can proceed to step260. If not, however, the method can continue to step275, where a new fault condition tracking number can be created within the outside server. The fault condition tracking number can correspond to the call-stack information and associated fault condition. The outside server can notify the organization that sent the diagnostic information of the status of the fault condition, i.e, whether a solution exists, and continue to monitor for future occurrences of the fault condition as determined from call-stack information until such time that the fault condition is diagnosed and/or resolved. When the fault condition is diagnosed and/or resolved, the organization(s) that experienced and reported the fault condition can be notified of the solution and/or status of the fault condition. Afterstep275, the method can repeat as may be required.

Instep260, a determination can be made as to whether a solution exists for the fault condition corresponding to the matched call-stack information. If not, the method can proceed to step265, where the organization that sent the diagnostic information can be advised that presently no solution exists. Instep270, the fault condition can be logged and the organization can be notified when a solution becomes available. Afterstep270, the method can repeat as may be required.

In the case where a solution does exist for the fault condition, the method can proceed to step280. Instep280, the organization that reported the fault condition optionally can be notified of the existence of a solution. In one embodiment, the outside server can send a message and/or notification to the centralized server or an administrator within the reporting organization.

Instep285, a notification optionally can be sent to an analyst within the outside organization which developed and/or supports the software that experienced the fault condition. The analyst that is notified can be one that has been assigned to work on matching, prior fault conditions either with the reporting organization or with another organization that also experienced the same or similar fault condition. For example, in one embodiment, when an analyst works on a particular fault condition, that analyst can be associated with the fault condition and/or the call-stack information within the outside server. When subsequent reports of the same or a similar fault condition are received, as determined from the call stack information, the diagnostic information can be forwarded to the associated analyst. This ensures that fault conditions are dealt with by experienced personnel.

Instep290, if it is determined that the fault condition can be cured by upgrading the application software that experienced the fault to a newer release or version, then such a process can be initiated. In one embodiment, the server within the outside organization can notify the centralized server within the organization that by upgrading to a newer version or release of the application software, the fault condition will be cured. A system administrator within the organization can configure the client and/or servers to automatically download and install such upgrades upon notification from the centralized server within the organization. Accordingly, in cases where a fault condition is experienced in a widespread fashion across an organization, the fix can be automatically distributed to the afflicted computer systems.

Instep295, the administrator within the organization, after upgrading any afflicted computer systems, can mark the fault condition as being resolved within the centralized server. By marking the fault condition resolved, if call-stack information is subsequently received which corresponds to the resolved fault condition, it can be determined that the fault condition is actually a new fault condition despite having call-stack information which matches the resolved fault condition. Accordingly, the new fault condition can be considered one that is unrelated to the prior, resolved fault condition. Marking a fault condition as being resolved can be performed on a per version basis, or a per software release basis as the case may be.

Method

200 has been provided to better illustrate various aspects of the present invention. It should be appreciated that one or more steps ofmethod200 can be optionally performed, or can be performed in a different order than described herein without departing from the spirit of the invention. For example, it should be appreciated that an analyst can be notified of a fault condition whether a solution exists or not. This allows an analyst working on a particular fault condition to be notified any time such a fault condition arises. The analyst is thereby exposed to the varying circumstances in which the fault condition is detected in order to increase the likelihood that a solution will be found. In another example, the outside server can routinely send notifications to the system administrator of the organization or the centralized server as to the status of different fault conditions whether a solution exists, does not exist, or whether similar fault conditions have been logged or not.

The present invention can be realized in hardware, software, or a combination of hardware and software. The present invention can be realized in a centralized fashion in one computer system or in a distributed fashion where different elements are spread across several interconnected computer systems. Any kind of computer system or other apparatus adapted for carrying out the methods described herein is suited. A typical combination of hardware and software can be a general-purpose computer system with a computer program that, when being loaded and executed, controls the computer system such that it carries out the methods described herein. The present invention also can be embedded in a computer program product, which comprises all the features enabling the implementation of the methods described herein, and which when loaded in a computer system is able to carry out these methods.

The terms “computer program”, “software”, “application”, variants and/or combinations thereof, in the present context, mean any expression, in any language, code or notation, of a set of instructions intended to cause a system having an information processing capability to perform a particular function either directly or after either or both of the following: a) conversion to another language, code or notation; b) reproduction in a different material form. For example, computer software can include, but is not limited to, a subroutine, a function, a procedure, an object method, an object implementation, an executable application, an applet, a servlet, a source code, an object code, a shared library/dynamic load library and/or other sequence of instructions designed for execution on a computer system.

The terms “a” and “an,” as used herein, are defined as one or more than one. The term “plurality,” as used herein, is defined as two or more than two. The term “another,” as used herein, is defined as at least a second or more. The terms “including” and/or “having,” as used herein, are defined as comprising (i.e., open language). The term “coupled,” as used herein, is defined as connected, although not necessarily directly, and not necessarily mechanically, i.e. communicatively linked through a communication channel or pathway.

This invention can be embodied in other forms without departing from the spirit or essential attributes thereof. Accordingly, reference should be made to the following claims, rather than to the foregoing specification, as indicating the scope of the invention.

Claims

1. A method of diagnosing a fault condition within software comprising:

responsive to a fault condition within a computing system belonging to an organization, automatically sending call-stack information for the fault condition to a first server within the organization;

within the first server, comparing the call-stack information for the fault condition with call-stack information from prior fault conditions that occurred within the organization to determine whether the call-stack information for the fault condition matches call-stack information from one of the prior fault conditions; and

if the call-stack information for the fault condition does not match, sending the call-stack information to a second server for comparison with call-stack information from prior fault conditions that occurred within at least one different organization.

2. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the second server is associated with an entity responsible for maintaining the software that experienced the fault condition, and wherein the second server is not part of the organization.

3. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the call-stack information of the fault condition matches the call-stack information from a prior fault condition within the first server, said method further comprising:

incrementing an occurrence count for the prior fault condition; and

identifying a fault condition having an occurrence count which corresponds to at least one selected criterion.

4. The method ofclaim 1, further comprising, prior to said automatically sending step, translating a call trace into a plurality of function names which comprise, at least in part, the call-stack information.

5. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the call-stack information is sent to the second server, said method further comprising:

matching the call-stack information of the fault condition with call-stack information for a prior fault condition that occurred within a different organization;

identifying an analyst assigned to the matching, prior fault condition; and

automatically routing the call-stack information to the analyst.

6. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the call-stack information is sent to the second server, said method further comprising notifying the organization that sent the call-stack information for the fault condition whether the fault condition is a known issue.

7. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the call-stack information is sent to the second server, said method further comprising determining whether the fault condition is corrected by a newer release of the software.

8. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the call-stack information is sent to the second server, said method further comprising:

determining that the fault condition is corrected by a newer release of the software; and

initiating an automatic update, within the computing system belonging to the organization, of the software to the newer release.

9. The method ofclaim 1, further comprising:

marking a fault condition resolved for a particular release of the software;

receiving subsequent call-stack information that matches the fault condition that has been marked resolved; and

determining that the call-stack information indicates a fault condition that is unrelated to the fault condition that was marked resolved.

10. A system for diagnosing a fault condition within software, said system comprising:

a computing system belonging to an organization, said computing system executing software configured to detect a fault condition and, responsive to the fault condition, automatically transmit call-stack information corresponding to the fault condition to another computer system within the organization; and

a server belonging to the organization, said server being configured to receive the call-stack information and compare the call-stack information for the fault condition with call-stack information corresponding to prior fault conditions originating from computing systems belonging to the organization, wherein the server is further configured to determine whether the call-stack information for the fault condition matches call-stack information from one of the prior fault conditions, and, if not, automatically transmits the call-stack information for the fault condition to a server that does not belong to the organization for further analysis.

11. The system ofclaim 10, wherein the computing system translates a call trace into a plurality of function names which comprise, at least in part, the call-stack information prior to automatically transmitting the call-stack information to another computer system within the organization.

12. The system ofclaim 10, wherein the call-stack information of the fault condition matches call-stack information from a prior fault condition within the server, said server further being configured to increment an occurrence count for the prior fault condition and identify a fault condition having an occurrence count which corresponds to at least one selected criterion.

13. A machine readable storage, having stored thereon a computer program having a plurality of code sections executable by a machine for causing the machine to perform the steps of:

if the call-stack information for the fault condition does not match, sending the call-stack information to a second server for comparison with fault stack information from prior fault conditions that occurred within at least one different organization.

14. The machine readable storage ofclaim 13, wherein the second server is associated with an entity responsible for maintaining the software that experienced the fault condition, and wherein the second server is not part of the organization.

15. The machine readable storage ofclaim 13, wherein the call-stack information of the fault condition matches the call-stack information from a prior fault condition within the first server, said method further comprising:

incrementing an occurrence count for the prior fault condition; and

identifying a fault condition having an occurrence count which corresponds to a selected criterion.

16. The machine readable storage ofclaim 13, further comprising, prior to said automatically sending step, translating a call trace into a plurality of function names which comprise, at least in part, the call-stack information.

17. The machine readable storage ofclaim 13, wherein the call-stack information is sent to the second server, said method further comprising:

identifying an analyst assigned to the matching, prior fault condition; and

automatically routing the call-stack information to the analyst.

18. The machine readable storage ofclaim 13, wherein the call-stack information is sent to the second server, said method further comprising determining whether the fault condition is corrected by a newer release of the software.

19. The machine readable storage ofclaim 13, wherein the call-stack information is sent to the second server, said method further comprising:

20. The machine readable storage ofclaim 13, further comprising:

marking a fault condition resolved for a particular release of the software;