CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS The present patent application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/774,351, filed Jan. 30, 2001, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to safety bindings for interfacing a ski boot to a ski or a skiboard. A skiboard is defined as a ski with an overall length of 100 cm or less.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Skiboards have been offered for sale with non-releasable bindings for several years. Non-releasable bindings were justified for use on skis under 100 cm due to the reasonable belief that the limited length of the ski would limit loads on the skier's leg to safe levels. Recently available statistics now show that injuries to skiboarders, although not largely disproportionate to the overall injury rate among skiers, show a disproportionate number of the injuries to the lower leg. These injuries include spiral fractures of the tibia, a very common injury to skiers before the availability of well engineered releasable safety bindings for skis in the 1970's and 1980's. The development of releasable safety bindings for skis has practically eliminated lower leg fractures and therefore appropriately designed releasable safety bindings can reasonably be expected to practically eliminate the lower leg fractures seen among skiboarders.
Conventional safety bindings for skis are not suitable for use on skiboards or other short skis for a variety of reasons:
- a. They are generally too long. The release mechanism is generally located in front of the toe and behind the heel of the boot. The running length of a skiboard is typically 65 cm. A boot/binding system is typically 60 cm.
- b. The thickness required by the skiboard design will not allow enough thickness for the typical attachment screws that hold the toe piece and heel pieces to the ski.
- c. The desirable flexibility of the extremities of the skiboard would compromise the function of conventional bindings that depend on the very stiff and stable platform typical of conventional skis and described by ASTM and ISO standards for compatibility.
- d. Skiboards do not and probably cannot be reasonably designed to conform to the ASTM and ISO standards for binding mounting areas on skis. These standards were developed to make ski designs compatible with conventional binding designs.
Furthermore, since the basic configuration of safety bindings was developed in the 70's and 80's, when skiboards and very short adult skis did not exist, there is an opportunity to eliminate some of the design limitations and flaws that have been perpetuated by the various binding manufacturer.
Current trends in ski design are towards much shorter ski lengths. Even skis used by elite world-class racers are often less than160cm in length, with running lengths less than 135 cm. The binding mounting area controlled by ASTM and ISO compatibility standards is 60 cm long. That is approximately 45% of the running length of a 160 cm ski. Compromises must be made in order to design these short skis to conform to ASTM and ISO standards intended to assure compatibility with the various bindings on the market. If a binding could be designed to eliminate or reduce the constraints imposed by conventional binding designs then ski design could be advanced to a new performance level. There have in the past been some efforts to create bindings which would not impair the ability of a ski to flex, such as U.S. Pat. No. 5,129,668 (Hecht) and U.S. Pat. No. 5,671,939 (Pineau), both of which describe a system in which a mounting is provided for the ski binding, said mounting creating a raised surface for the binding while allowing the ski to flex to a full arc. These mounting however add to both the cost and the complexity of a binding since an entirely new part is added.
Mounting conventional bindings is a complex procedure that is normally done by certified professionals employed by ski shops and trained by specialists. If a binding could be designed to mount to metal inserts built into a ski in a standard insert pattern with machine screws then this complexity can be eliminated. This is the norm in the snowboard industry where bindings can be simply mounted by the consumer with nothing more than a Phillips screwdriver.
Controlling the effects of boot/binding friction on binding performance is one of the most difficult factors of binding design. Shortcomings in how friction has been dealt with by designers of conventional bindings makes the adjustment of the binding to the boot, and confirmation that such adjustments will produce the desired release characteristics, a very complex task that is normally performed by certified professionals. This is due to the fact that most of the friction between the boot and the binding is not “sensed” by the release mechanism of the binding. Therefore, any variation in frictional forces produces a variation in release torque. The person adjusting the binding must understand this relationship to properly adjust the binding.
If a binding could be designed with a sensing mechanism that senses all the forces between the boot and the binding that result in a torque on the tibia then friction would not have to be controlled within very strict limits. Frictional loads would only have to be held below a value that is in the range of normal friction between a typical shoe sole and the ground since humans have evolved the strength to withstand such forces. All frictional forces not seen by the release mechanism would be contained within the binding mechanism and therefore would be subject to the control of the design engineers and of no concern to the person mounting and adjusting the binding. Boot binding adjustment would not be critical to binding performance and could potentially be undertaken by the consumer.
One solution which has been used in trying to solve this problem in the past are plate bindings. Plate bindings of various types have a plate which is either formed integral with the binding as in U.S. Pat. No. 4,052,086 (Eckhart), U.S. Pat. No. 5,240,275 (Jungkind), U.S. Pat. No. 5,044,657 (Freisinger et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 4,893,831 (Pascal et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 4,892,326 (Svoboda et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 4,314,714 (Gertsch) and U.S. Pat. No. 4,073,509 (Gertsch) or having a detachable plate which is fastened to the ski boot as in U.S. Pat. No. 5,145,202 (Miller), U.S. Pat. No. 5,044,654 (Meyer), U.S. Pat. No. 4,395,055 (Teague, Jr.), U.S. Pat. No. 4,185,851 (Salomon) and U.S. Pat. No. 3,944,237 (Teague, Jr.). In both of these types of binding the designer attempts to take the unknown friction between the boot and the binding out of the picture by having the boot be fixed to a plate and leaving only a known friction between the plate and the binding.
Conventional bindings release by sensing a lateral force at the toe of the boot and cannot differentiate between loads at the tip of the ski and loads at the tail of the ski that produce the same torque about the tibial axis. For example, a release caused by a force on the lateral (outside) edge of the ski 70 cm in front of the tibial axis will subject the tibia and connective tissues to same torque but opposite shear load than if the same load where applied to the medial (inside) edge 70 cm behind the tibial axis. It is believed by many knowledgeable in the art of ski binding design and ski injury analysis that Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injuries to the knee are often caused by a load to the medial (inside) edge of the tail of the ski. This kind of load causes an abduction and inward twisting of the lower leg. If a binding could be designed that could differentiate between loads applied at the tip of the ski, outward twisting loads applied at the lateral side of the ski tail and inward twisting loads applied at the medial side the ski tail it may have the potential to afford skiers significant additional protection against ACL injuries that conventional bindings cannot provide.
There is therefore a need for a safety binding for ski or skiboard which obviates the aforementioned shortcomings.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved ski binding that addresses, but is not limited to addressing the above issues, and to provide a safety binding for interfacing a ski boot to a ski or a skiboard. As previously explained, a skiboard is defined as a ski with an overall length of 100 cm or less. The safety binding in question has a base plate which, in the preferred embodiment of the invention, is shorter than a conventional ski binding and which can be mounted, via its central portion, on standard inserts built into the ski. The connection with the ski itself is located centrally on the binding and once mounted the base plate is raised slightly above the surface of the ski. Thus the binding does not require the same flat surface binding mounting area as a conventional binding, and the normal flexibility of the ski is not hindered by the binding. In a variant of the preferred embodiment, the base plate could also be unitary with the ski or skiboard.
Mounted on the base plate is a top plate which is pivotable in a lateral direction. The top plate is biased towards a predetermined position. Mounted on the top plate are means for holding a ski boot in place. The mounting is such that any pivoting movement of the top plate with respect to the base plate will result in at least one of the holding means being pivoted, translated and/or otherwise moved. This pivoting, translating and/or other movement(s) will cause the holding means to release the boot. The heel is also designed to release with conventional means. While in the binding, the boot generally rests on a toe pad and on a heel pad. These pads are connected to the top plate such that any torque on the boot is transferred, through these pads, to the top plate. If the force is sufficient to overcome the bias of the top plate, then the top plate will pivot and the boot will be released. After the boot is released, the bias of the top plate returns it to its normal state. The heel portion of the binding can also be outfitted with a conventional ski brake to prevent the ski from sliding away in the case of a release.
In accordance with a first (FIG. 3) illustrative embodiment of the invention, a ski binding is provided for securing a ski boot to a ski. The binding comprises a base, two elongated plates pivotably attached to the base near its centroid, a toe cup and a heel cup rotatably attached to the elongated plates. The two elongated plates, the toe cup, and the heel cup are pivotably attached to each other in a parallelogram arrangement. The elongated plates are biased by a spring and cam to have their longitudinal axis aligned with the longitudinal axis of the ski. The toe and heel cups constrain the ski boot substantially parallel to the elongated plates. Any torque applied to the ski boot is transmitted through the toe and heel cups to the elongated plates. At a prescribed load, the elongated plates rotate from their biased positions and the parallelogram arrangement skews causing the toe and heel cups to rotate such that the boot is free to release from the binding.
In accordance with a second (FIG. 4) illustrative embodiment of the invention, a ski binding is provided for securing a ski boot to a ski. The binding comprises a base, a rigid plate pivotably attached to the base near its centroid, a toe cup and a heel cup pivotably attached near the extremities of the rigid plate, one or more connecting rods pivotably attached to the base and pivotably attached to a separate point on the toe and/or heel cup. The rigid plate is biased by a spring such that its longitudinal axis is aligned with the longitudinal axis of the ski. The toe and heel cups constrain the ski boot substantially parallel to the rigid plate. Any torque applied to the ski boot is transmitted through the toe and heel cups to the rigid plate. At a prescribed load, the rigid plate rotates from its biased position and the connecting rod(s) cause the toe and heel cups to rotate such that the boot is free to release from the binding.
In accordance with a third illustrative embodiment of the invention, which is a variant of the embodiment ofFIG. 4, a ski binding is provided for securing a ski boot to a ski. The binding comprises a base, a rigid plate pivotably attached to the base near its centroid, a toe and heel cup slidably attached near the extremities of the rigid plate, one or more connecting rods attached at one end to the toe and/or heel cup(s) and at the other end connected or in contact with a link or cam surface on the base so that any rotational moment, from the boot through the toe and heel cups, that overcomes the biased alignment of the rigid plate causes the connecting rod(s) to translate the toe and/or heel cup(s) away from the boot in such a way that the boot free to release from the binding.
In accordance with a fourth (FIG. 5) illustrative embodiment of the invention, a ski binding is provided for securing a ski boot to a ski. The binding comprises an elongated base plate, an elongated rigid top plate pivotably attached to the base plate near its centroid, a toe and/or heel cup pivotably or translatably attached to both the elongated base plate and the pivotable rigid top plate at separated points. Any rotational moment applied to the boot and transmitted to the toe and heel cups that overcomes the biased alignment of the pivotable top plate and causes the pivotable top plate to move relative to the base plate will cause the toe and/or heel cup(s) to rotate or translate in such a way that the boot is free to release from the binding. The biased alignment of the pivotable top plate is maintained by a double spring/cam arrangement having two springs which are attached to pins which connect with four distinct cam surfaces. The cam surfaces are attached to the pivoting plate in opposing positions. By altering the cam surfaces it is possible to have a different bias for the directions in which the pivoting plate can pivot.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS The invention will be better understood and appreciated from following the description of illustrative embodiments thereof, and accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of one embodiment of the invention with a boot, mounted on a typical skiboard.
FIG. 1A is a perspective view of the embodiment shown inFIG. 1, without the boot.
FIG. 2 is a side view of the embodiment shown inFIG. 1.
FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a second embodiment of the invention from which certain components have been removed.
FIG. 4 is a perspective cross-sectional view of a third embodiment of the invention from which certain components have been removed.
FIG. 5 is a perspective cross-sectional view the embodiment of the invention described inFIG. 1.
FIG. 5A is a close-up of the biasing means shown inFIG. 5.
FIG. 5B is a perspective view of the embodiment of the invention described inFIG. 1 from which certain components have been removed.
FIG. 6 is a top view of the embodiment shown inFIG. 1 with some components removed from view, showing the elongated base plate and spring biasing means.
FIG. 6A is a top view of the embodiment shown inFIG. 1A.
FIG. 7 is a top view of the embodiment show inFIG. 1 in an open position, without the boot.
FIG. 8 is a top view of the embodiment shown inFIG. 1 in an open position with a ski boot superimposed.
FIG. 9 is an exploded view of the embodiment shown inFIG. 1.
FIG. 10 is an exploded view of the embodiment shown inFIG. 4.
FIG. 11 is a perspective view of the embodiment shown inFIG. 4.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS The invention will be better understood in the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments with reference to the drawings.
FIGS. 1 and 2 show the most preferred embodiment of the invention. In this embodiment the binding100 is mounted on a ski10 (partially shown). The binding100 is separated from theski10 by abottom pad110, which allows theski10 to flex and makes sure that theski10 is not harmed by the binding100 when flexing. Resting on thebottom pad110 is astatic base plate120. The central area of thestatic base plate120 contains the biasing means180 (shown inFIGS. 5 and 6), which hold thetop plate130 in its normal position.Top plate130 is mounted on top of thestatic base plate120, generally only through its central portion thereof, in such a way that thetop plate130 can pivot laterally around the biasing means180. Mounted on thetop plate130 are theheel holding cup150 and thetoe holding cup140. These cups work to hold a boot (shown schematically as60) to the binding100. Theheel cup150 is also fitted with conventional boot release means160. Theboot60 rests on theheel pad155 and thetoe pad145. These pads are mounted on thetop plate130 such that any torque applied to theboot60 is transmitted to thetop plate130. Theheel pad155 is also fitted with aconventional ski brake170 which prevents theski10 from sliding away in the case of a release of theboot60.
As best seen inFIG. 2, the binding100 is fastened to theski10 byscrews20 only in its central portion. Also, the binding100 is separated from theski10 by thebottom pad110, which tapers off towards the extremities of the binding100 to createspaces15 or alternatively is sufficiently soft towards the extremities to deflect or compress in order to create spaces. The existence ofspaces15 allows for theski10 to flex without being hindered by the binding100. Moreover, since the binding100 is mounted to theski10 only in the central portion of the binding100 and not at its extremities (seeFIG. 2), as in the prior art, the binding100 does not hinder the upward and downward flexing movements of theski10 during use. In other words, the binding mounting area of the binding100 on theski10 is substantially reduced. This is a particular advantage for short skis and/or skiboards wherein prior art bindings use to have a large binding mounting area (approximately 60 cm to be compliant with ATSM and ISO standards) which generally negatively affects the flexibility of these short skis and/or skiboards.
FIG. 3 shows another embodiment of the invention. In this embodiment, the invention has abase pad210 which attaches to the ski (not shown). Mounted on top of thebase pad210 are twoelongated plates222 and224 which can pivot laterally about theircentroid221 and223. Theplates222 and224 are biased towards being aligned with the ski, by thebiasing mechanism280. This mechanism is adjustable to give a greater or lesser bias bywheel282. Mounted on top of theplates222 and224 are thetoe cup240 and theheel cup250. In this embodiment thetoe cup240 and theheel cup250 are integrally formed with atoe pad245 and aheel pad255. Each of thetoe pad245 and theheel pad255 are pivotally connected to bothelongated plates222 and224 atpoints246,247,256 and257. A boot (not shown) rests on thetoe pad245 and theheel pad255, such that torsional forces (about a vertical axis) on the boot cause frictional and/or impingement forces to be applied by the boot to thetoe pad245 and to theheel pad255. These forces are transferred to theplates222 and224. If the force is sufficiently large to overcome the bias created by thebiasing mechanism280, then theplates222 and224 will pivot laterally, thus being displaced with respect to each other. This displacement causes thetoe cup245 and theheel cup255 to be pivoted thereby releasing their hold on the boot.
FIG. 4 shows still another embodiment of the invention. In this embodiment we have abase pad310 on top of which is pivotably mounted atop plate330. A spring (not shown) gives the top plate330 a bias towards being aligned with the ski (not shown). Mounted over thetop plate330 aretoe cup340 andheel cup350, both of which are pivotable about a vertical axis. The toe cup and the heel cup are pivotably attached to thetop plate330 such that any torsional force about a vertical axis affecting a boot held between thetoe cup340 and theheel cup350 will cause thetop plate330 to pivot about itscentroid335. Thetoe cup340 and theheel cup350 are further attached to connectingrods320 which are situated within thetop plate330. If a torsional force, created on a boot secured in the binding, is great enough to overcome the bias in thetop plate330, then thetop plate330 will pivot laterally causing the connectingrods320 to move and thereby rotating thetoe cup340 and theheel cup350 to a release position. After the boot has been released the bias in thetop plate330 will return thetop plate330 to is neutral position.
FIGS. 5, 5A,5B, and6 clearly show the insides of the biasing means180 of the embodiment of FIGS.1 to2, which is responsible for giving thetop plate130 its predetermined bias. The biasing means180 consists of anadjustor182, which can be used to adjust the force needed to overcome the bias, and twosprings184 and186 which are connected to thetop plate130 to give it its bias. These figures also show the fastening means142 and152 by which theheel pad155 and thetoe pad145 are connected to thetop plate130. It is through these that the torsional force on the boot is transferred to thetop plate130. Also shown are the connecting means144 and154 which hold thetoe cup140 and theheel cup150 to thebase plate120. It is through these two different connections that thetoe cup140 and theheel cup150 are caused to pivot or translate during release. We also see the bias pins183 and185 which are connected to thesprings184 and186 and thetop plate130 by the way of cam surfaces187,188,189, and190 which are in contact withfront cam roller191 andrear cam roller192.
By properly designing the cam surfaces187,188,189 and190, it is possible to obtain a ski binding in which the ski boot will be released more easily if a load is applied to the medial (inside) edge of the tail of the ski than if a similar load is applied to the lateral (outside) edge of the front of the ski. For instance,FIGS. 5A, 5B and7 illustrate the event when a rotational moment induced by a load applied to the ski boot is transmitted to the toe andheel cups140,150 and overcomes the biased alignment of thetop plate130. This event causes thetop plate130 to move relative to thebase plate120 and also causes the toe and/or heel cup(s)140,150 to rotate or translate in such a way that the boot is free to be released from the binding. Eachcam surface188 and189 comprises respectivelateral sides188′,188″ and189′,189″ and are attached to thetop plate130. Though not shown, cam surfaces187 and190 also comprise lateral sides similar tolateral sides188′,188″ and189′,189″ of cam surfaces188 and189. Cam surfaces187 and190 are also attached to thetop plate130. By altering the cam surfaces187,188,189 and190, it is possible to have a different bias for the directions in which thetop plate130 can pivot.
FIG. 7 shows a top view of the preferred embodiment of the invention in an open configuration. In this figure we can see how a twisting load on the forebody of the ski affects thetop plate130. Thetop plate130 pivots in a counterclockwise direction about therear cam roller192, thetoe cup140 and theheel cup150 are pivoted in a clockwise direction about connectingmeans142 and152, thereby releasing the boot. Alternatively, if the twisting load is applied to the tail of the ski the top plate pivots about thefront cam roller191.
FIG. 8 shows the same configuration asFIG. 7 only this time with aboot60 superimposed to show how thetoe cup140 and theheel cup150 release the boot as they pivot.
The skilled addressee will note that contrary to the prior art, in the binding100, the vertical axis around which thetop plate130 pivots with respect to the base plate is located inside or within the area defined by the binding100. In other words, it is as if thetop plate130 was turning or pivoting around itself. This particularity of the pivotal movement of thetop plate130 helps in creating a more compact binding100.
FIG. 9 shows an exploded view of the preferred embodiment of the invention as shown inFIGS. 1, 1A,2,5,5A,5B and6.FIG. 9 shows all the parts and how they relate to each other.
FIGS. 10 and 11 show respectively an exploded view and an assembled view of the embodiment show inFIG. 4,
The skilled addressee will understand that even though the base plate has been described as an individual and distinct component of the binding of the present invention, the base plate may alternatively be fully incorporated into the ski or skiboard. Therefore, by providing a ski or skiboard with an incorporated and integrally mounted base plate, it is contemplated to provide a binding having only the top plate.
In any case, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that several modifications and variations not mentioned exists. Accordingly the previous descriptions are only meant for the purposes of illustration and are not meant to limit the scope of the invention.