US20060191086A1 - Toothbrush employing acoustic waveguide - Google Patents

Abstract

A power toothbrush (10) is disclosed having a handle (15), battery (12), ultrasonic drive circuit (14), motor (16), control unit (18), and toothbrush head (20). The toothbrush head includes bristles (26) and a waveguide (24) that is operatively connected to an ultrasonic transducer (22). The waveguide facilitates the transmission of acoustic energy into the dental fluid to achieve improved cleaning and stain removal and improved cleaning in interproximal and subgingival regions. In one embodiment an ultrasound transducer module (30) includes a plurality of piezoelectric elements (32, 34) that may be mechanically connected in series, and electrically connected in parallel. One or more contacts (36) connect the elements, and a waveguide structure (50). An impedance matching layer (38) may be provided between the waveguide and the ultrasonic transducer module. The waveguide may be formed from an relatively soft material, for example, a polymer having a hardness between 10 and 65 Shore A.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
• This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/981,735, filed Nov. 3, 2004, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/517,638, filed on Nov. 4, 2003. This application also claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/677,577, filed May 3, 2005. The disclosures of the priority patent applications are expressly incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
STATEMENT OF GOVERNMENT LICENSE RIGHTS
• One or more of the inventions disclosed herein were made with Government support under SBIR Contract No. 1-R43-DEO16761-01. The Government may have certain rights in one or more of those inventions.
BACKGROUND
• Existing power toothbrushes, even the most effective, leave clinically significant plaque at tooth contact surfaces, at the gingival-tooth contact points, below the gingiva, and beyond the direct reach of the bristles or other toothbrush components. Previous attempts at creating ultrasonic toothbrushes failed to exploit microbubble formation in dental fluid for purposes of facilitating plaque removal or failed to consider microbubbles and macrobubbles as a potential impediment to ultrasound propagation beyond the bristle tips. Some early toothbrushes that employed ultrasound technology attempted propagation of ultrasound waves from the base of the bristles either through the bristles themselves or through the bubbly dental fluid that fills the spaces between the bristles. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,138,733, No. 5,247,716, No. 5,369,831, and No. 5,546,624, to Bock. Because conventional toothbrush bristles and bubbly dental fluid can reduce rather than facilitate the propagation of ultrasound waves, those toothbrushes fell short of achieving efficient ultrasound wave propagation. Also, the ultrasound systems in prior art toothbrushes did not take advantage of the specific bubbly structure within dental fluid.
SYNOPSIS OF THE ART
• U.S. Pat. No. 3,335,443, to Parisi, discloses a brush that is coupled to an ultrasonic, vibratory, handheld dental instrument that is capable of being vibrated at high sonic and ultrasonic frequencies.
• U.S. Pat. No.3,809,977, to Balamuth et al., which reissued as U.S. Pat. No. 28,752, discloses ultrasonic kits, ultrasonic motor constructions, and ultrasonic converter designs for use alone or in combination. The ultrasonic motor may be of piezoelectric material having a removable tip and is contained in a housing having an electrical contact means adapted to be plugged into an adapter that is connected to a converter.
• U.S. Pat. No. 3,828,770, to Kuris et al., discloses a method for cleaning teeth employing bursts of ultrasonic mechanical vibration at an applicator repeated at a sonic frequency to produce both ultrasonic and sonic vibratory motion during use.
• U.S. Pat. No. 3,840,932 and No. 3,941,424, to Balamuth et al., disclose an ultrasonic toothbrush applicator in a configuration to be ultrasonically vibrated to transmit mechanical vibrations from one end to a bristle element positioned at the other end.
• U.S. Pat. No. 4,071,956, to Andress, discloses a device, that is not a toothbrush, for removing dental plaque by ultrasonic vibrations.
• U.S. Pat. No. 4,192,035, to Kuris, discloses an apparatus comprising an elongated member formed of a piezoelectric member with a pair of contacting surfaces with a brush member adapted to be received within the human mouth. A casing adapted into a handle is configured to receive the piezoelectric member.
• U.S. Pat. No. 4,333,197, to Kuris, discloses an ultrasonic toothbrush that includes an elongated handle member in the form of a hollow housing having disposed therein a low voltage coil and cooperating ferrite core that is driven at ultrasonic frequencies. A brush member is affixed to the core and is adhesively affixed to an impedance transfer device that is adhesively affixed to the core material. The impedance transfer device insures maximum transfer of ultrasonic energy from the core material to the brush.
• U.S. Pat. No. 4,991,249 and No. 5,150,492, to Suroff, disclose an ultrasonic toothbrush having an exchangeable toothbrush member that is removably attached to an ultrasonic power member.
• U.S. Pat. No. 5,138,733, to Bock, discloses an ultrasonic toothbrush having a handle, a battery pack, an electronics driving module, a piezoelectric member, and a removable brush head. The piezoelectric crystal resonates, expands and contracts volumetrically, in tune with the frequency supplied by the electronic driving modules, thereby converting electronic energy into sound-wave energy.
• U.S. Pat. No. 5,247,716, to Bock, discloses a removable brush head for an ultrasonic toothbrush having a plurality of bristle clusters, a substantially tubular body constructed of a flexible material, and tensioning means securing the brush head to the ultrasonic device, providing for the efficient transmission of ultrasonic frequency vibrations from the device via the brush head.
• U.S. Pat. No. 5,311,632, to Center, discloses a device for removing plaque from teeth comprising a toothbrush having a thick, cylindrical, hollow handle encompassing (1) an electric motor that is actuable to cause rotation of an eccentrically mounted member and vibration of the entire device, and (2) an ultrasonic transducer actuable to produce high frequency sound waves along the brush.
• U.S. Pat. No. 5,369,831, to Bock, discloses a removable brush head for an ultrasonic toothbrush.
• U.S. Pat. No. 5,546,624, to Bock, discloses an ultrasonic toothbrush including a handle constructed of a rigid material, a battery pack, an electronics driving module, a piezoelectric member, and a removable brush head. The piezoelectric crystal resonates, expands and contracts volumetrically, in tune with the frequency supplied by the electronic driving module and thereby converts the electronic energy into sound-wave energy.
• Japanese Application No. P1996-358359, Patent Laid Open 1998-165228, discloses a toothbrush utilizing ultrasonic waves in which an ultrasonic wave generator is provided in the handle of a manual or electrically powered toothbrush and an ultrasonic wave vibrator is mounted in the brush and wired to the wave generator.
• Japanese Application No. P2002-353110, Patent Laid Open 2004-148079, discloses an ultrasonic toothbrush wherein ultrasonic vibration is radiated from a piezoelectric vibrator arranged inside a brush head and transmitted to the teeth via a rubber projection group.
• U.S. Pat. No. 6,203,320, to Williams et al., discloses an electrically operated toothbrush and method for cleaning teeth. The toothbrush includes a handle, a brush head connected to the handle having a plurality of hollow filament bristles, passageways through the handle and brush head for transporting fluid into and through the hollow filament bristles, an electrical energy source in the handle, and a vibratory element for imparting a pulsation to the fluid being transported.
• U.S. Patent Publication No. 2003/0079305, to Takahata et al., discloses an electric toothbrush in which a brush body is simultaneously oscillated and reciprocated. The electric toothbrush comprises a casing main body, an arm extending above the casing main body, a brush body arranged in a top end of the arm, and an ultrasonic motor arranged in a top end inside of the arm for driving the brush body.
• U.S. Pat. No. 35,712, which is a reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 5,343,883, to Murayama, discloses an electric device (i.e., a flosser) for removal of plaque from interproximal surfaces. The device employs sonic energy and dental floss secured between two tines of a flexible fork removably attached to a powered handle. The electric motor revolves at sonic frequencies to generate sonic energy that is transmitted to the flexible fork.
• U.S. Pat. No. 6,619,957, to Mosch et al., discloses an ultrasonic scaler comprising a scaler tip, actuator material, a coil, a handpiece housing, and an air-driven electrical current generator. The actuator material, coil, and air-driven electrical current generator are all encompassed within the handpiece housing.
• U.S. Pat. No. 6,190,167, to Sharp, discloses an ultrasonic dental scaler for use with a dental scaler insert having a resonant frequency. The dental scaler insert is removably attached to a handpiece having an energizing coil coupled to a selectively tunable oscillator circuit to generate a control signal having an oscillation frequency for vibrating the dental scaler.
• U.S. Pat. No. 4,731,019, to Martin, discloses a dental instrument for scaling by ultrasonic operation. The instrument of the dental instrument has a distal end with a hook-like configuration with a conical pointed end and comprising abrasive particles, typically diamond particles.
• U.S. Pat. No. 5,150,492, to Suroff, discloses an ultrasonic toothbrush having an exchangeable ultrasonic implement that may be removably mounted to an ultrasonic power means that is encompassed within the toothbrush handle.
• U.S. Pat. No. 5,378,153, to Giuliani, discloses a dental hygiene apparatus having a body portion and an extended resonator arm. The apparatus employs an electromagnet in its body that acts in combination with two permanent magnets to achieve an oscillating action about a torsion pin. The arm is driven such that the bristle-tips operate within ranges of amplitude and frequency to produce a bristle tip velocity greater than 1.5 meters per second to achieve cleansing beyond the tips of the bristles.
• There remains a need in the art for toothbrush designs that achieve improved dental cleaning properties between the teeth and gums, at points of contact between the teeth, and beyond the direct action of the bristles.
SUMMARY
• The present invention fulfills these and other related needs by providing toothbrushes, including power and manual toothbrushes, that employ an acoustic waveguide, either alone or in combination with an ultrasonic transducer and/or sonic component, to achieve improved plaque and stain removal and user experience. Accordingly, within certain embodiments, the present invention provides power toothbrushes having one or more acoustic waveguide(s) that is capable of propagating and may function to focus acoustic waves transmitted by an ultrasonic transducer into the dental fluid, thereby inducing cavitation of microbubbles and, in addition or alternately, inducing acoustic streaming, with a consequent improvement in the loosening and removal of dental plaque from dental surfaces and interproximal regions. When used in combination with a sonic component, the acoustic waveguide can, additionally or alternatively, be made to vibrate such that the acoustic waveguide contributes to enhanced fluid flow in the oral cavity and to the formation of microbubbles in the dental fluid, beyond the reach of the acoustic waveguide and/or toothbrush head bristle tips. When used in combination with a sonic component, the enhanced bubbly fluid flow generated by the acoustic waveguide can, additionally or alternatively, work synergistically with the ultrasound transmitted through the acoustic waveguide to further facilitate plaque and stain removal beyond the reach of the acoustic waveguide and/or toothbrush head bristle tips.
• In an embodiment of the present invention, an ultrasonic transducer is utilized at the toothbrush head, at the base of and in operable proximity to an acoustic waveguide or, alternatively, mechanically coupled to the toothbrush head from within the toothbrush handle via an acoustically transmitting conduit (made, for example, from metal, gel, or fluid). In either embodiment, the ultrasonic transducer transmits ultrasonic waves to the acoustic waveguide that, in turn, propagates those ultrasonic waves into the dental fluid such that the waves are effective in causing cavitation of microbubbles within the dental fluid and, alternatively or additionally, acoustic streaming. Within certain embodiments, toothbrushes of the present invention may also comprise one or more toothbrush bristle tufts that contribute to the generation of microbubbles within the dental fluid. The ultrasonic waves cause cavitation of those microbubbles that, in turn, results in the improved plaque and stain removal properties of toothbrushes disclosed herein.
• Additional embodiments of the present invention provide power toothbrushes having an ultrasonic transducer and an acoustic waveguide in further combination with a sonic component that operates within the audible frequencies to mechanically move the brush head, including the bristles and acoustic waveguide, to increase flow of the dental fluid at a velocity and intensity required to contribute to microbubble production. The acoustic waveguide and ultrasonic waves that it transmits act in a synergistic fashion to produce a scrubbing bubbly jet within the dental fluid, both by increasing the instantaneous spatial distribution of bubbles available for activation, and by increasing the distribution of ultrasound owing to the sonic motion of the acoustic waveguide. The acoustic waveguide and ultrasonic waves also act synergistically to create a bubbly jet by each contributing to the acceleration of the bubbly fluid, the acoustic waveguide by pushing fluid directly and the ultrasonic waves by inducing acoustic streaming.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
• The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages of this invention will become more readily appreciated as the same become better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
• FIG. 1A is a schematic, partially cross-sectional diagram depicting an exemplary power toothbrush of the present invention;
• FIG. 1B is a perspective view of one embodiment of an ultrasonic transducer module of the present invention;
• FIG. 1C is a perspective, partially broken-away view of one embodiment of an acoustic waveguide in combination with the ultrasonic transducer module shown inFIG. 1B;
• FIG. 2A is a diagram depicting a cross-sectional view of an exemplary power toothbrush head similar to the embodiment illustrated inFIG. 1A, showing a handle, bristles, an ultrasonic transducer, and an acoustic waveguide shaped generally as a rectangular solid with a convex tip;
• FIG. 2B is a diagram depicting a finite element model simulation geometry of the exemplary toothbrush head shown inFIG. 2A (shown here without bristles);
• FIG. 2C is a diagram depicting the simulated ultrasound wave field at 1.2 ms post-pulse wherein the ultrasonic waves remain mainly in the acoustic waveguide;
• FIG. 2D is a diagram depicting the simulated ultrasound wave field at 2.0 ms post-pulse, wherein the ultrasonic waves have substantially left the acoustic waveguide;
• FIG. 3A is a diagram depicting a finite element model simulation geometry of a toothbrush head wherein the exemplary acoustic waveguide has a tapered profile;
• FIG. 3B is a perspective view of the tapered profile waveguide shown inFIG. 3A;
• FIG. 3C is a side view of the simulated wave field plot soon after ultrasonic transmission, showing propagation within the acoustic waveguide;
• FIG. 3D is a side view of the simulated wave field plot at a later time subsequent to ultrasonic transmission showing acoustic waveguide propagation of the ultrasonic wave front into the fluid emulsion;
• FIG. 3E is an end view of the simulated wave field plot at the same simulation time asFIG. 3C;
• FIG. 3F is an end view of the simulated wave field plot at the same simulation time asFIG. 3D;
• FIG. 4A is a finite element model simulation geometry of another exemplary acoustic waveguide, wherein the waveguide tip is curved;
• FIG. 4B is a perspective view of the waveguide shown inFIG. 4A, wherein the portion beyond the curved dotted line is removed;
• FIG. 4C is the simulated wave field plot soon after ultrasonic transmission, showing propagation within the acoustic waveguide;
• FIG. 4D is a wave field plot at a later time subsequent to ultrasonic transmission showing the focusing of the ultrasonic wave front beyond the tip of the acoustic waveguide and propagation of that ultrasonic wave front into the fluid emulsion;
• FIGS. 5A-5D are ultrasound images of fluid flow generated by an ultrasonic toothbrush with and without a waveguide;
• FIG. 5A is a combined Doppler (inside the box) and B-mode (outside the box) image depicting fluid flow induced by an ultrasonic toothbrush without an acoustic waveguide and without bristle tip motion (bristle tips (BT) and bristle plate (BP) at the bottom of bristles);
• FIG. 5B is a combined Doppler and B-mode image depicting fluid flow induced by an ultrasonic toothbrush without an acoustic waveguide but with bristle tip motion (MB) and demonstrating absence of any measurable fluid flow (FF) beyond the bristles;
• FIG. 5C is a B-mode ultrasound image depicting fluid flow induced by an ultrasonic toothbrush with an acoustic waveguide, wherein the waveguide is made to vibrate by a sonic component and showing that the vibrating acoustic waveguide generated a jet of bubbly fluid moving away from the toothbrush head;
• FIG. 5D is a Doppler and B-mode ultrasound image of the same ultrasonic toothbrush as described forFIG. 5C, further showing significant fluid flow (FF) and bubble (B) formation beyond the bristle tips;
• FIG. 6 is a plot comparing the measured acoustic pressure levels at the tip of a flat versus a focused lens acoustic waveguide;
• FIG. 7 is a plot showing the absorption of ultrasound waves transmitted through a dental fluid/bubble emulsion versus frequency;
• FIG. 8 is a plot showing the percent of suspended red blood cells destroyed by shear stress induced by acoustic microstreaming associated with a stably oscillating bubble. The inset depicts a thin, hollow wire with air in its center, placed within a vial of suspended red blood cells;
• FIGS.9A-H depict geometries of various exemplary acoustic waveguides for use in the toothbrush heads of the present invention; and
• FIG. 10 is a bar graph of data demonstrating the safety of a toothbrush according to the present invention, as measured using the cell lysis assay described in Example 5.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
• The present invention is based upon the discovery that a toothbrush employing an acoustic waveguide, either alone or in combination with an ultrasonic transducer and/or sonic component, yields improved cleaning properties as compared to existing power toothbrush technologies. It is contemplated that toothbrushes according to the present invention may or may not include a number of conventional bristle tufts, as discussed below. In one embodiment, for example, a toothbrush employs a waveguide structure in combination with bristle tufts and a sonic component for vibrating the waveguide structure and bristle tufts at sonic frequencies. In another embodiment, a toothbrush employs an acoustic waveguide structure in combination with an ultrasonic wave generator. In yet another embodiment, a toothbrush employs an acoustic waveguide structure in combination with an ultrasonic wave generator and a sonic component.
• As described in detail herein, toothbrushes according to the present invention are effective in (1) increasing bubbly fluid flow by motion, including sonic motion, of the acoustic waveguide and bubble formation by the waveguide and/or one or more toothbrush bristles; (2) transmitting focused ultrasonic waves generated by an ultrasonic transducer and propagating those waves through an acoustic waveguide into the dental fluid to achieve improved plaque disruption and removal; and/or (3) facilitating bubbly fluid flow and transmitting ultrasound to interact optimally and maximally at and beyond-the-bristles (e.g., between about 0.5 mm and about 5 mm from the bristle tips, more typically between about 1 mm and about 3 mm from the bristle-tips), within the dental fluid.
• Thus, within certain embodiments, the present invention provides toothbrushes, including manual toothbrushes and power toothbrushes, comprising an acoustic waveguide. In certain embodiments of the present invention, toothbrushes are provided that comprise an acoustic waveguide in combination with an ultrasonic transducer that, together, act upon the microscopic bubbly flow within the dental fluid, either as a consequence of brushing with a bristled toothbrush head and/or the motion of the acoustic waveguide acted upon by the sonic component to induce cavitation, acoustic streaming, and/or acoustic microstreaming within the dental fluid. Therefore, yet additional embodiments of the present invention provide toothbrushes comprising an acoustic waveguide in combination with an ultrasonic component and in further combination with a sonic component. The sonic component, in combination with an acoustic waveguide, being fabricated of a suitable material, and/or in combination with one or more toothbrush bristles, is further responsible for generating a favorable mouth feel, stimulating and massaging the gums and other dental tissue, and promoting an improved dental cleaning experience.
• All references to ranges of parameters described in this specification are understood to include reference to a range equal to and greater than the lower value of each range, as well as ranges equal to and less than the higher value of each range. Thus, for example, the recitation of a carrier frequency of between about 250 and about 500 kHz in this specification is interpreted to include carrier frequencies of 250 kHz and greater; carrier frequencies of 500 kHz and less; as well as carrier frequencies within the stated range. All U.S. and foreign patents and patent applications and all other references cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Definitions and Parameters Governing the Operation of Inventive Toothbrush Technologies
• As used herein, the terms “ultrasound” or “ultrasonic” refer to acoustic energy, or sound, of a frequency higher than and outside of the normal audible range of the human ear—generally of a frequency higher than approximately 20 kHz. Typically, ultrasonic transducers employed in the toothbrushes of the present invention are capable of producing ultrasonic frequencies within the range of about 20 kHz to about 5000 kHz, more typically, from about 100 kHz to about 750 kHz, still more typically, from about 250 kHz to about 750 kHz and, in some embodiments, from about 250-350 kHz. The term “sonic” refers to acoustic energy, or sound, of a frequency that is within the audible range of the human ear—generally up to about 20 kHZ—for example, between 20 Hz and 20 kHz.
• As used herein, the term “cavitation” refers to the generation and/or stimulation of bubbles by sound. More specifically, the term “cavitation” is used herein to refer to the interaction between an ultrasonic field in a liquid and in gaseous inclusions (e.g., microbubbles) within the insonated medium. By “generation” is meant the creation of bubbles; by “stimulation” is meant the action that causes the bubbles to become dynamically active: that is, to move, to get bigger and smaller, to grow, to dissipate, all with associated mechanical and/or chemical effects in and around the fluid surrounding the bubbles and within the gas inside the bubbles.
• Cavitation of existing microbubbles may be subdivided, to a first approximation, into two general categories—“stable cavitation” and “inertial cavitation.” “Stable cavitation” is the induction of stable, low-amplitude, resonant oscillations of preexisting microbubbles by low-intensity ultrasound energy that, in turn, generates local shear forces within the fluid flow (referred to herein as acoustic microstreaming) near and adjacent to the microbubbles. As the ultrasound intensity is increased, the amplitude of oscillation also rises until the bubble becomes unstable and collapses due to the inertia of the inrushing fluid, giving rise to “inertial cavitation.”
• The resulting extremes of pressure and temperature within a violently collapsing bubble (one typically more active than those required for the present invention) can be sufficient to initiate free radical generation by hydrolysis of contained water vapor. If bubble collapse occurs in proximity to a fluid/solid interface (for example, a dental surface), shear forces within the medium and high velocity fluid jets are directed toward the solid structures, i.e., the teeth and gums. In the context of the present invention, cavitation effects include ultrasound-induced stimulation of microbubbles already present in the dental fluid due to the action of bristles into stable cavitation that, through the resulting scrubbing action from the shear forces associated with microstreaming, displaces or loosens plaque and other debris from dental surfaces and interproximal surfaces. Another effect can be the generation of coherent fluid flow away from the transducer, called acoustic streaming, whose strength is enhanced by the interaction of the ultrasound and microbubbles. Generally, ultrasonic transducers incorporated in toothbrushes of the present invention induce cavitation of microbubbles that are between about 1 μm and about 150 μm in diameter.
• Toothbrushes of the present invention incorporating an ultrasound transducer and acoustic waveguide typically promote at least stable cavitation—that is, simple volumetric changes in bubbles where factors in addition to and/or instead of the inertia in the surrounding fluid govern the bubble behavior. Bubbles have a primary resonant frequency that varies inversely with the bubbles' radius and also strongly depends on other factors, such as gas content and surface tension. Typically, for example, bubbles in dental fluid having a diameter of between about 1 μm and about 150 μm resonate when ultrasound is applied to those bubbles with an ultrasound transducer operating in the 20 kHz to 3 MHz range. More typically, bubbles in dental fluid having a diameter of between about 1 μm and about 100 μm resonate when ultrasound is applied to those bubbles with an ultrasound transducer operating in the 30 kHz to 3 MHz range. Still more typically, bubbles in dental fluid having a diameter of between about 4.3 μm and about 33 μm resonate when ultrasound is applied to those bubbles with an ultrasound transducer operating in the 100 kHz to 750 kHz range. Still more typically, bubbles in dental fluid having a diameter of between about 5 μm and about 30 μm resonate when ultrasound is applied to those bubbles with an ultrasound transducer operating in the 100 kHz to 600 kHz range. Still more typically, bubbles in dental fluid having a diameter of between about 6.5 μm and about 22 μm resonate when ultrasound is applied to those bubbles with an ultrasound transducer operating in the 150 kHz to 500 kHz range. In an exemplary toothbrush presented herein, bubbles in dental fluid having a diameter of between about 12 μm and about 26 μm resonate when ultrasound is applied to those bubbles with an ultrasound transducer operating in the 250 kHz to 500 kHz range. Whether or not the applied ultrasonic frequency differs from a bubble's resonant frequency, low levels of ultrasound induce temporal variations in bubble volume that are initially small and sinusoidal, both within an acoustic cycle and over many acoustic cycles. And, whether or not the applied ultrasonic frequency differs from a bubble's resonant frequency, those induced temporal variations in bubble volume generate movement within the fluid in proximity to the bubble, whose mechanical effects assist in and promote the removal of plaque.
• Due to geometric properties and impedance mismatch, cavitating bubbles scatter and emit sound. Compression and rarefaction of a bubble undergoing stable cavitation cause an emission of sound, primarily at the frequency of the applied signal for low levels of ultrasound. As bubbles grow toward their resonant frequency (which can happen in only a few cycles) or as the applied sound field increases, the volumetric changes in the bubble evolve to more complex functions of time within an acoustic cycle, as do the acoustic emissions, whether or not those changes remain radially symmetric. As a function of growing bubble amplitude, those emissions first include the superharmonics (2F0, 3F0, etc.) of the applied signal (F0) (as well as acoustic emissions of F0 itself). Eventually, a once stabley-oscillating bubble may collapse violently and/or become asymmetric, with an associated increase in amplitude of the superharmonic emissions as well as broadband acoustic emissions (i.e., non-integral values of F0) over a greater range of frequencies, including the eventual emission of multiples of the subharmonic of the applied signal (e.g., (½)F0). By detecting these emissions—for example, via a hydrophone—the level of cavitation activity within insonified material can be remotely assessed and correlated with a variety of mechanical and chemical effects associated with cavitation, such as, for example, plaque removal, as demonstrated herein. See Chang et al.,IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control48(1):161-170 (2001); Poliachik et al.,Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology27(11):1567-1576 (2001); Leighton,Ultrasonics Sonochemistry2(2):S123-S136 (1995); and Roy et al.,J. Acoust. Soc. Am87(6):2451-2458 (1990). For example, when divided by the amplitude of the applied signal, one can expect the normalized amplitude of the superharmonics to increase as bubble activity increases, with associated increases in plaque removal. In addition, one can expect the integral over the spectral emission band (from (½)F0 through 10F0, say) of the bubbly medium to increase as bubble activity increases, with an associated increase in plaque removal.
• As used herein, the terms “microstreaming” and “acoustic microstreaming” refer to the movement of fluid near and adjacent to microbubbles that occurs as a result of the action of mechanical pressure changes within the ultrasonic field on the microbubbles. In the context of the present invention, shear forces are associated with the cavitating microbubbles within dental fluid that are distributed along the surfaces of the gums and teeth, as well as in interproximal and subgingival spaces. These shear forces, in turn, remove the plaque and/or stains on these surfaces.
• Several ultrasound parameters contribute to producing “acoustic microstreaming” in the context of toothbrushes of the present invention. The carrier frequency (i.e., the frequency of the individual ultrasound waves) is generally above about 20 kHz; typically between about 30 kHz and about 3 MHz; more typically between about 100 kHz and about 750 kHz; in some embodiments between about 100 kHz and about 600 kHz; in some embodiments between about 150 kHz and about 500 kHz; and, in some embodiments, between about 250 kHz and about 500 kHz. It will be understood that the actual, optimal range of the carrier frequency will depend upon the available bubble population and the size of ultrasound transducer employed.
• The “pulse repetition frequency” (“PRF”), i.e., the frequency of packets or bursts of individual ultrasound waves, typically, though not exclusively, ranges from about 0.5 Hz and about 10,000 Hz; more typically between about 0.5 Hz and about 2,500 Hz, and still more typically between about 1 Hz and about 500 Hz. The desired PRF may depend upon the ultrasound frequency, the number of cycles per burst and the environment in which the toothbrush is operating, including the medium in which the ultrasonic energy is being used. In toothpaste, for example, a preferred PRF at a 10% duty cycle is generally less than about 20 Hz and may be less than about 10 Hz. In an aqueous environment, though, a higher PRF may be used—typically over 40 Hz and in the range of between 40 to 200 Hz. In some embodiments of toothbrushes of the present invention that use ultrasound frequencies in combination with sonic frequencies, the PRF is a small multiple (generally two or greater, more typically four or greater) of the sonic frequency (i.e., the frequency of movement of the bristles and/or acoustic waveguide driven by a sonic component of a toothbrush of the present invention).
• The number of individual ultrasound waves within a packet or burst of ultrasound (cycles per burst) is typically between about 10 and about 10,000; for many embodiments between about 500 and 10,000. The desired number of cycles per burst depends upon the ultrasound frequency, the PRF, and the environment in which the toothbrush is operating. For promoting acoustic microstreaming in the context of toothbrushes of the present invention, relatively long bursts and relatively low PRF are suitable. The product of PRF and burst duration yields the duty cycle (i.e., the percentage of time that the ultrasound is activated). Typically, the duty cycle is between about 1% and about 15%. The ultrasonic components of toothbrushes of the present invention preferably operate within these ranges.
• Preferred ultrasonic operating parameters depend, as described above, on several interrelated factors, including the ultrasonic frequency, the PRF, the number of cycles per burst, the duty cycle, and the environment in which the device is operated. For devices operated in a toothpaste emulsion environment, the combinations of operating parameters described in the table below are suitable.

  Ultrasound Frequency Range	Cycles/Burst	PRF (Hz)	Duty Cycle

  100-750	kHz	500-10,000	0.5-75	5%
  100-750	kHz	500-10,000	1.0-150	10%
  100-750	kHz	500-10,000	1.5-225	15%
  250-500	kHz	500-10,000	1.3-50	5%
  250-500	kHz	500-10,000	2.5-100	10%
  250-500	kHz	500-10,000	3.8-150	15%
  300	kHz	500-10,000	1.5-30	5%
  300	kHz	500-10,000	3.0-60	10%
  300	kHz	500-10,000	4.5-90	15%

• For devices operated in a water environment, the combinations of operating parameters described in the table below are suitable.

  Ultrasound Frequency Range	Cycles/Burst	PRF (Hz)	Duty Cycle

  100-750	kHz	50-1,000	5-750	5%
  100-750	kHz	50-1,000	10-1500	10%
  100-750	kHz	50-1,000	15-2250	15%
  250-500	kHz	50-1,000	12.5-500	5%
  250-500	kHz	50-1,000	25-1000	10%
  250-500	kHz	50-1,000	37.5-1500	15%
  300	kHz	50-1,000	15-300	5%
  300	kHz	50-1,000	30-600	10%
  300	kHz	50-1,000	45-900	15%

• In yet another embodiment, a toothbrush of the present invention having an ultrasound transducer operates at an ultrasound frequency of from 250-350 kHz, at a duty cycle of about 10% with about 5,000 cycles per burst at a pulse repetition frequency of about 6 Hz. In yet another embodiment, a toothbrush of the present invention having an ultrasound transducer operates at an ultrasound frequency of from 250-350 kHz, at a duty cycle of about 10% with about 500 cycles per burst at a pulse repetition frequency of about 60 Hz.
• As used herein, the term “acoustic streaming” refers to the bulk or coherent flow of fluid that occurs due to momentum transfer from an acoustic wave to a fluid as a result of attenuation of an ultrasound beam. Ultrasound propagating into fluid, with or without bubbles, can generate “acoustic streaming,” which can be quite significant in size and extent, and even greater with than without bubbles in the fluid. Acoustic streaming generally requires higher frequencies than required for stimulating the bubbles—the higher the frequency, the greater the acoustic streaming.
• The acoustic streaming velocity, V, is proportional to the amplitude absorption coefficient, α, of the fluid, which is itself proportional to the frequency of the ultrasound under linear acoustic propagation conditions, and even more strongly dependent upon frequency under nonlinear acoustic propagation conditions, and inversely proportional to its kinematic viscosity, ν, as follows:
  V=(αl²I/cν)(G)
  where I is the intensity in the beam of ultrasound and l the ultrasound beam diameter, c is the velocity of sound and G is a geometric factor that depends upon the size of the acoustic beam. Zauhar et al.,British J. of Radiology71:297-302 (1998).
• Ultrasound operating parameters for promoting “acoustic streaming” in the context of toothbrushes of the present invention may vary from those employed for promoting acoustic microstreaming. The ultrasound parameters that generally promote acoustic streaming include a carrier frequency typically greater than about 20 kHz; more typically, between about 500 kHz and about 5,000 kHz or more, to enhance acoustic absorption. The pulse repetition frequency (“PRF”) is typically, though not exclusively, between about 1 Hz and about 10,000 Hz; more typically between about 10 Hz and about 10,000 Hz; still more typically between about 100 Hz and about 10,000 Hz; and yet more typically, between about 1,000 Hz and about 10,000 Hz. The number of individual ultrasound waves within a packet or burst of ultrasound is typically between 1 and 5,000 cycles/burst; more typically between about 5 and about 100 cycles/burst. To enhance “acoustic streaming,” longer duty cycles are typical, such as, for example, at least about 10%; more typically between about 25% and about 100%; still more typically between about 50% or about 75% and about 100%. Longer bursts, e.g., greater than about 100 waves at a frequency of about 1 MHz, with a PRF of at least 1,000 Hz, are exemplified herein.
• As used herein, the term “mechanical index” refers to a measure of the onset of cavitation of a preexisting bubble subjected to one cycle of applied acoustic pressure. Holland et al.,IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control36(2):204-208 (1989); and Apfel et al.,Ultrasound Med. Biol.17(2):179-185 (1991). This measure is proportional to the peak negative pressure (MPa) amplitude and inversely proportional to the square root of the frequency (MHz) of the applied sound. When the value of mechanical index exceeds 1.9, it is possible for ultrasound to produce inertial cavitation, the most mechanically active type of cavitation, which is in excess of the amount required to remove plaque. The governing assumptions require isothermal growth of an optimally sized bubble, the neglect of gas diffusion into the bubble, and that the fluid surrounding the bubble is incompressible. These three assumptions produce the most active bubble collapse, making the mechanical index a conservative measure of the onset of inertial cavitation.
• Empirical evidence indicates that plaque removal may be achieved with mechanical indices as low as 0.1. Theoretical considerations, however, suggest that plaque reduction may be achieved with mechanical indices as low as 0.01. Krasovitski et al.,IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control51(8):973-979 (2004). For example, the shear stress on a wall created by acoustic microstreaming associated with a bubble suspended in water and subjected to ultrasound at a frequency of 430 kHz and pressure amplitude of 10,000 Pa (e.g., a mechanical index of approximately 0.01) is predicted to be approximately 5 Pa, which is sufficient to remove plaque via steady flow over plaque. Stoodley et al.,J. Industrial Microbiology&Biotechnology29:361-367 (2002). The mechanical indices delivered by toothbrushes of the present invention are generally in the range of about 0.001 to about 1,000. More typically, mechanical indices are in the range of about 0.001 to about 100, still more typically in the range of about 0.002 to about 20, and even more typically in the range of about 0.01 to about 5, or between about 0.01 and about 1.9. Toothbrushes delivering mechanical indices of less than about 1.9, more typically less than about 1.5, and frequently less than about 1.2 are contemplated by the present invention.
• The acoustic output of an ultrasound device, measured as the peak negative acoustic pressure, is related to the mechanical index. Suitable operating peak negative acoustic pressure parameters in toothbrushes of the present invention are generally in the range of from about 0.01 to 100 MPa; more typically in the range of from 0.1 to 10 MPa; for many embodiments in the range of from 0.1 to 1 MPa; for many embodiments in the range of from 0.25 to 0.6 MPa; and in yet other embodiments in the range of from 0.3 to 0.5 MPa.
• As used herein, the term “microbubble” refers to microscopic bubbles present in the oral cavity, for example, in the dental fluid or plaque. “Microbubbles” may be endogenous to the fluid, such as through the introduction of an appropriate dentifrice; may be generated by toothbrush bristles through manual brushing; and/or may be generated by bristles in combination with the sonic component of certain of the presently disclosed power toothbrushes. “Microbubbles” are acted upon by an ultrasonic signal transmitted by an ultrasonic transducer and propagated by an acoustic waveguide. “Microbubbles” resonate at or near a specific frequency depending upon the microbubbles' diameter.
An Exemplary Toothbrush
• FIG. 1A shows anexemplary toothbrush10 according to the present invention. Thetoothbrush10 comprises ahandle15 constructed of a rigid or semirigid material, and typically houses arechargeable battery12 that is preferably adapted to be induction charged; electrical circuitry, including an ultrasonicmodule drive circuit14; asonic component16 comprising a motor, preferably a DC motor for driving atoothbrush head20 at sonic frequencies; and a timer andmotor control unit18. Suitable motors, ultrasonic drive circuits, rechargeable batteries, and timer and motor control units are well known in the art.
• Attached to thehandle15 is atoothbrush head20 including a support structure including astem portion21 and further comprising anultrasonic transducer22 and anacoustic waveguide24 in operable proximity and acoustically coupled to theultrasonic transducer22. In the toothbrush embodiment presented inFIG. 1A, anultrasound reflection element28 is shown behind, and extending around each side of, theultrasonic transducer22. It will be appreciated that theultrasound reflection element28 at least partially reflects the ultrasound through theacoustic waveguide24 and into the dental fluid. Thetoothbrush head20 may be either removably or fixedly attached to thehandle15. In general, thetoothbrush head20 includes a plurality ofbristle tufts26 retained by thesupport structure21 and disposed generally adjacent to, or near to, theacoustic waveguide24. Thetoothbrush head20 may optionally include animpedance matching layer29. Theimpedance matching layer29 improves the efficiency of the device, as discussed below.
• In the disclosed embodiment, alternating current supplied by the ultrasonicmodule drive circuit14 drives theultrasonic transducer22 such that thetransducer22 expands and contracts primarily along one axis at or near resonance with the frequency supplied by the ultrasonicmodule drive circuit14, thereby converting electrical energy into ultrasonic energy. The resulting ultrasonic sound waves are conducted into, propagated through, focused by, and radiated out of theacoustic waveguide24. The focused ultrasonic energy acts on microbubbles within the dental fluid (typically saliva and dentifrice, not shown) to induce cavitation, thereby loosening plaque deposited on the teeth and in interproximal regions.
The Ultrasonic Transducer and Module
• As described above, certain embodiments of the present invention provide atoothbrush10 that employs anultrasonic transducer22 to generate ultrasonic energy in combination with anacoustic waveguide24 to efficiently propagate that ultrasonic energy into the dental fluid. Microbubbles, either present in the dental fluid through conventional, manual brushing action with a manual toothbrush and/or formed by action of asonic component16 driving the motion of the toothbrush bristletufts26 and/oracoustic waveguide24 at sonic velocities (see below), are stimulated through ultrasonic energy-induced cavitation to achieve “scrubbing bubbles” that are effective in loosening and removing plaque from a tooth surface and interproximal regions at a finite distance from the toothbrush head.
• Absent action of theultrasonic transducer22 of the present invention, microbubbles are simply passive voids within the dental fluid. Theultrasonic transducer22 disclosed herein causes these microbubbles to pulsate, thereby generating local fluid motion around the individual bubbles. This effect is referred to herein as “microstreaming” and, in combination with the ultrasonic cavitation effects, achieves shear stresses that are sufficient to disrupt plaque. Typically, shear stresses achieved by microstreaming induced by theultrasonic transducer22 of the present invention, are between about 0.1 Pa and about 1,000 Pa. More commonly, shear stresses achieved by microstreaming are between about 0.2 Pa and about 500 Pa. Still more commonly, shear stresses are between about 0.3 Pa and about 150 Pa. And most commonly, shear stresses are between about 1 Pa and about 30 Pa.
• Another effect of theultrasonic transducer22 is that it promotes acoustic streaming and produces momentum within the dental fluid in a direction toward the teeth and interproximal and subgingival spaces, thereby increasing the velocity and coherency of the dental fluid. This bulk fluid-flow process is referred to herein as acoustic streaming. Either through the generation of acoustic microstreaming and/or acoustic streaming, the associated shear and pressure forces act to erode and dislodge the plaque in a manner and to an extent that is in excess of that achieved by the toothbrush bristletufts26 alone. In particular, these ultrasonic effects are facilitated by propagating the ultrasonic waves from theultrasonic transducer22 through anacoustic waveguide24 and into the dental fluid near and beyond the tips ofbristle tufts26.
• Ultrasonic transducers22 that may be suitably employed in theultrasonic toothbrush10 of the present invention are readily available in the art (see, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,938,612 and No. 6,500,121, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety) and, most commonly, operate either by the piezoelectric or magnetostrictive effect. Magnetostrictive transducers can, for example, produce high intensity ultrasonic sound in the 20-40 kHz range. Alternatively, ultrasound may be produced by applying the output of an electronic oscillator to a thin wafer of piezoelectric material, such as lead zirconate titanate (PdZrTi or PZT). There is a wide variety of piezoelectric PZT ceramic blends that can be used to fabricate ultrasonic transducers suitable for use in the toothbrushes of the present invention. Other transducer materials, such as piezopolymers, single or multilayer polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), or crystalline piezoelectric materials, such as lithium niobate (LiNbO₃), quartz, and barium titanites, may also be used. Ultrasound transducers may be flat or curved (as, e.g., in a conic section) to focus the ultrasonic waves.
• In addition to piezoelectric materials, capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer (cMUT) materials or electrostatic polymer foams are also suitable. Many of these materials can be used in a variety of vibrational modes, such as radial, longitudinal, shear, etc., to generate the acoustic waves. In addition, single-crystal piezoelectric materials, such as Pb(Mg_1/3Nb_1/3)O₃—PbTiO₃(PMN-PT), K_1/2Na_1/2NbO₃—LiTaO₃—LiSbO₃(KNN-LT-LS) as described in Lead-free piezoelectric ceramic in the K_1/2Na_1/2NbO₃solid solution system, N. Marandian Hagh, E. Ashbahian, and A. Safari presented at the UIA symposium March 2006, and others, may be used to reduce voltage/transmit-level ratios by as much as an order of magnitude.
• In addition to the transducer materials, one or multiple impedance matching layers29 (typically designed as quarter-wave matching layers) can help to improve the efficiency and bandwidths when transmitting from the commonly high-impedance transducer materials into the much lower impedance acoustic waveguide materials. Generally, a matching material is chosen with a thickness that will support a quarter wave of the desired frequency and an acoustic impedance optimally selected within the two impedances to be matched. Appropriate materials can include materials such as epoxy and metal particulate composites, graphite, or a host of other candidate materials known by and readily available to the skilled artisan.
• In one embodiment, as illustrated inFIG. 1B, an ultrasound transducer suitable for use in toothbrushes of the present invention comprises two or more piezoelectric elements. In a currently preferred embodiment theultrasonic transducer30 has a rectangular or trapezoidal profile and includes twopiezoelectric elements32 and34 with one or more electrical contact(s)36 contacting the piezoelectric elements and in electrical contact with an ultrasonic module drive circuit14 (FIG. 1A) handle15. The ultrasonicmodule drive circuit14 may be placed elsewhere in the apparatus, for example in thebrush head20. Thepiezoelectric elements32,34 are stacked in series mechanically, and connected in parallel electrically. Mechanical stacking the elements in series provides that the displacements associated with the individualpiezoelectric elements32,34 are added. Electrically connecting thepiezoelectric elements32,34 in parallel provides that the capacitance associated with the individualpiezoelectric elements32,34 are also additive. This provides a greater range of electronics driving possibilities.
• Theultrasonic transducer30 may also comprise animpedance matching layer38 and one or more mountingprongs40 for interaction with an acoustic waveguide and/or to facilitate placement of thetransducer30 in thebrush head20. Although a generally rectangularultrasonic transducer30 structure is illustrated, it will be appreciated that piezoelectric elements and transducer structures may be provided in a variety of two and three dimensional configurations and that non-rectangular ultrasonic transducer structures may be used in toothbrushes without departing from the present invention.
• It is contemplated that theultrasonic transducer30 may be provided as a component of an ultrasound generator module designed for installation in toothbrushes of the present invention, the module including one or more piezoelectric crystal(s) with attached electrodes, one or more optional matching layer(s), one or more acoustic waveguide(s), and a supporting structure. The supporting structure is designed to direct ultrasonic wave propagation through the optional matching layer(s) and waveguide. This may, for example, be accomplished by selecting the supporting structure coupling features to coincide with areas of minimal motion (nodal mounting) on the piezoelectric ceramic, matching layer, and waveguide. In one embodiment, the acoustic waveguide has a base portion that is mounted over the transducer assembly and extends from the transducer assembly. One suitable mounting orientation, for example, is to locate the ultrasound transducer in the body of the brush head with the acoustic waveguide extending from the-base of the brush head in the same direction as the bristle tufts. The transducer module generally resides within the toothbrush head and is replaced with the bristles and brush head when the toothbrush head exceeds its useful life.
• Additional waveguide supporting structures may also be provided as structural features of the transducer module or the brush head structure. A waveguide support flange may be provided in proximity to the perimeter of the waveguide structure extending from the brush base, for example, to provide a rigid structure supporting the base of the waveguide.
• Regardless of the precise configuration of the individual elements that comprise the ultrasound module, the piezoelectric element, matching layer and/or the waveguide shape are generally designed to focus the acoustic energy at a desired location relative to the emanating surface or to disperse the acoustic energy in a specific beneficial pattern. The ultrasonic energy may, for example, radiate directly from a generating source such as a piezoelectric ceramic element directly into the oral cavity fluid without an intervening matching layer or waveguide. Alternatively, an acoustic waveguide may be placed directly on the piezoelectric ceramic. In still further embodiments, the entire ultrasonic module, including the acoustic waveguide, are fabricated from a piezoelectric polymer.
• The following section describes the acoustic waveguide structure in greater detail.
The Acoustic Waveguide Structure
• As indicated above, one aspect of the present invention is based upon the observation that an acoustic waveguide used in operable combination with an ultrasonic transducer is effective in propagating ultrasonic waves from the transducer into the dental fluid, thereby generating and/or causing cavitation of microscopic bubbles (microbubbles) present within the dental fluid. Typically, as shown inFIG. 1A, theultrasonic transducer22 is positioned at the base of thetoothbrush head20, in operable proximity and acoustically coupled to theacoustic waveguide24, such that ultrasonic waves are efficiently propagated into and through theacoustic waveguide24 and into the dental fluid (not shown). As noted above, within certain embodiments, the present invention also providespower toothbrushes10 comprising atoothbrush head20 having anacoustic waveguide24 wherein thetoothbrush head20 is operably connected to asonic component16 and wherein thesonic component16 causes theacoustic waveguide24 to vibrate so as to increase the flow and generation of microbubbles in the dental fluid into which theacoustic waveguide24 is immersed during use.
• Within still further embodiments are providedpower toothbrushes10 comprising a combination of anacoustic waveguide24 in operable proximity to anultrasonic transducer22 and operably connected to asonic component16 to achieve still further improved dental cleaning properties owing to the combined increase in fluid flow and microbubble formation, as well as cavitation and acoustic microstreaming effects. Here, operable connection can be facilitated by putting theultrasonic transducer22 in direct contact with theacoustic waveguide24 or, alternatively, ultrasound conducting material such as animpedance matching layer29 can be placed between theultrasonic transducer22 and theacoustic waveguide24 both to increase the efficiency of ultrasound transmission from thetransducer22 into theacoustic waveguide24 or, alternatively or additionally, to usefully increase the distance between thetransducer22 and theacoustic waveguide24 to facilitate the manufacturing process of the device, for example.
• The acoustic waveguide provides a conduit for the transmission of ultrasonic waves from the ultrasonic transducer, where they are generated, through an (optional) impedance matching layer, to the fluid in the oral cavity. The acoustic waveguide, in general, has a size and profile that is substantially larger than that of an individual bristle or bristle tuft and is substantially more effective in delivering ultrasonic energy to the fluid in the oral cavity. The length of the waveguide is, typically, a factor of approximately 1.5-2.5 times the wavelength of the ultrasonic waves in the waveguide medium multiplied, although the length may vary in increments of approximately one-half wavelength to achieve efficient ultrasound wave propagation. The actual height and width of the acoustic waveguide is determined by design parameters such as the ultrasound transducer face area, mounting considerations, and aesthetic requirements.
• FIG. 1C illustrates an exemplaryacoustic waveguide structure50 in combination with the exemplaryultrasonic transducer30 shown inFIG. 1B. Thewaveguide structure50 comprises abase structure52 sized to (at least partially) cover theultrasound transducer30 and having a configuration generally matching that of the ultrasound transducer.Base structure52 is generally mounted and anchored in a toothbrush head20 (FIG. 1A) withdistal waveguide portion54 extending outwardly from the brush head structure. Thewaveguide structure50 is preferably a unitary structure having a generally block-like three-dimensional configuration having multiple faces. In the embodiment illustrated, the cross-sectional area ofbase structure52 is generally larger than the cross-sectional area ofdistal waveguide portion54 and opposingside walls56 and endwalls58 are tapered and terminate distally in adistal waveguide face60.Distal waveguide face60 may be curved in a generally convex configuration, as illustrated inFIG. 1C. In alternative embodiments,distal waveguide face60 may be generally flat, curved in a generally concave configuration, or curved in a more complex configuration. The intersections of one or more of the waveguide faces may be rounded or chamfered, as shown, or they may form angular corners. Additional waveguide embodiments are described in greater detail below.
• Rigid acoustic waveguides, such as solid waveguides made from aluminum or titanium, and hollow waveguides filled with degassed water, have been described for the delivery of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) into living tissue for therapeutic purposes (such as drug delivery and hemostasis) via heat induction and/or for the generation of inertial cavitation. See, e.g., U.S. Patent Publication No. 2003/0060736 to Martin et al. and Mesiwala et al.,Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology28(1):389-400 (2002). These applications for acoustic waveguides demonstrate the use of a physical member to facilitate propagation of ultrasound beyond the face of an ultrasound transducer to achieve therapeutic benefit. The currently preferred waveguide structure is, in contrast, based upon the observation that acoustic waveguides comprising a flexible member, typically having a flat profile, may be employed in combination with an ultrasound transducer to facilitate propagation of ultrasound into the oral cavity to stimulate existing bubbles to remove plaque in a way that also optimally generates a bubbly fluid jet (due to the flat aspect of the profile) and promotes a favorable mouth feel.
• The dental fluid into which the acoustic waveguide is immersed during use is typically a saliva and toothpaste emulsion that is very acoustically absorptive due to the presence of large air pockets within individual bristle tufts and between neighboring bristle tufts and, without the use of an acoustic waveguide, would attenuate significant amounts of the ultrasound before the wave front reached the tooth and gum surfaces. The air medium has very low acoustic impedance, which creates a large impedance mismatch with the high acoustic impedance materials generally used in the ultrasonic transducer. This impedance mismatch is a significant barrier to sound transmission from the ultrasonic transducer to the tooth and gum surfaces. The acoustic waveguide serves as a bridge across this acoustic mismatch by accepting, containing, and transmitting the acoustic energy into the saliva and toothpaste emulsion near the tooth surface, thereby overcoming the attenuation effect normally encountered by the saliva and toothpaste emulsion.
• A variety of acoustic waveguide designs are contemplated by the present invention as exemplified by the acoustic waveguides illustrated inFIGS. 2-5 and9A-9H. Depending upon the precise embodiment of the present invention, the acoustic waveguide may be used alone, in combination with a sonic component, and/or in combination with an ultrasonic transducer. Suitable acoustic waveguides have in common the capacity to physically move the dental fluid and/or to efficiently facilitate the propagation and possibly the focusing of ultrasonic waves transmitted by the ultrasonic transducer, thereby enhancing fluid motion and the associated effects of the resulting cavitation and microstreaming.
• FIG. 2A shows an embodiment of an exemplarypower toothbrush head120 comprising anultrasonic transducer122 in combination with anacoustic waveguide124. The side view shows theacoustic waveguide124, which carries the ultrasonic energy from theultrasonic transducer122 to the teeth and gums (not shown).Acoustic waveguide124 is in operable proximity and acoustically coupled to theultrasonic transducer122 and adjacent to and flanking, on one or more sides, bristletufts126. The size and configuration of the base ofacoustic waveguide124, in this embodiment, generally matches the size and configuration ofultrasonic transducer122 and/orimpedance matching layer129. The tip ofacoustic waveguide124 distal from theultrasonic transducer122 has a smaller cross-sectional area than that of the base ofacoustic waveguide124 in proximity toultrasonic transducer122.
• Theacoustic waveguide124, in the embodiment illustrated inFIG. 2A, has one dimension oriented generally along the longitudinal axis of the brush head120 (the length), that is wider than the diameter of abristle tuft126 and, more preferably, has a length that is greater than the (side-to-side) combined diameters of two bristletufts126. In another embodiment, the length of theacoustic waveguide124 is greater than the (side-to-side) combined diameters of five bristletufts126. In another dimension, the width of the acoustic waveguide124 (oriented generally transverse to the longitudinal axis of thebrush head120 as shown inFIG. 2A) at its base is generally greater than the diameter of abristle tuft126 and, in some embodiments, is generally greater than the (side-to-side) combined diameters of at least two bristletufts126.
• In one embodiment, the height of theacoustic waveguide124 exposed when the waveguide is mounted in thebrush head120 is less than the exposed height of at least one bristletuft126 and, in another embodiment, the height of theacoustic waveguide124 exposed when the waveguide is mounted in thebrush head120 is less than the exposed height of each of thebristle tufts126. In another embodiment, the height of the exposedacoustic waveguide124 portion is greater than at least one bristletuft126 provided in thebrush head120. In general, the exposed height of the acoustic waveguide is greater than about 50% and less than about 120% of the exposed height of thebristle tufts126. In yet another embodiment, the exposed height of theacoustic waveguide124 is greater than about 70% and less than about 110% of the exposed height of thebristle tufts126. In some embodiments, the cross-sectional area ofwaveguide124 at its distal face is at least five times greater than that of abristle tuft126; in another embodiment, the cross-sectional area ofwaveguide124 at its distal face is at least ten times greater than that of abristle tuft126; and in another embodiment, the cross-sectional area ofwaveguide124 at its distal face is at least twenty times greater than that of abristle tuft126. In this exemplary design, theacoustic waveguide124 is made from a soft, smooth material, such as silicone rubber, known for both its pleasant surface texture and ability to transmit ultrasound.Impedance matching layer129 is disposed betweenacoustic waveguide124 andultrasonic transducer122.
• Two parameters that substantially affect the transmission of ultrasonic waves through an acoustic waveguide are (1) the material from which the waveguide is fabricated, and (2) the geometry of the waveguide. Each of these parameters is described in further detail herein. Regardless of the precise acoustic waveguide material and geometry employed, the present invention contemplates the selection of parameters to achieve a favorable mouth feel. Thus, the material from which the acoustic waveguide is fabricated or molded is preferably soft enough to be appealing when placed within the mouth and/or direct contact with the mouth. As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, an acoustic waveguide with an appealing texture is ideally designed to efficiently couple in, conduct, coherently focus, incoherently compress, and couple out the acoustic energy.
• The selection of suitable materials for fabricating an acoustic waveguide for use in a toothbrush of the present invention can be readily achieved by the skilled artisan in consideration of the following guidelines. Various dielectric materials, such as silicon dioxide (SiO₂), silicon nitride (Si₃N₄), and many polymers can be used as the waveguide material. For example, silicone rubber and other types of rubbers, silicone materials such as castable/moldable RTV, liquid injection-molded (LIM) silicone, thermoplastic elastomers, thermal plastic elastomer (TPE) injection-molded processes, and closed or open cell foams may all be used. Polymers have an advantage over other waveguide materials, owing to their relatively low shear wave velocity. However, because of their viscoelasticity, cross-linking may be necessary to avoid excessive acoustic loss and provide equilibrium elastic stress, thus providing a more stable waveguide layer.
• The hardness of materials suitable for use in acoustic waveguides of the present invention may be determined by either the Shore (Durometer) test or the Rockwell hardness test. Both of these hardness test methodologies are well known and readily available in the art. These tests measure the resistance of materials to indentation and provide an empirical hardness value. Shore hardness, using either the Shore A or Shore D scale, is the preferred method for rubbers/elastomers and is also commonly used for “softer” plastics, such as polyolefins, fluoropolymers, and vinyls. The Shore A scale is generally used for “softer” rubbers, while the Shore D scale is generally used for “harder” materials. Shore hardness is measured with a Durometer and, consequently, is also known as Durometer hardness. The hardness value is determined by the penetration of the Durometer indenter foot into the sample. The ASTM test method designation is ASTM D2240. Related methods include ISO 7619, ISO 868, DIN 53505, and JIS K 6253. Each of these Durometer test methodologies is hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
• The Durometer measurement of acoustic waveguides employed in toothbrushes of the present invention generally range in hardness from 5 Shore A to 60 Shore D, more typically from 10 to 100 Shore A, and still more typically from 10 to 65 Shore A. An acoustic waveguide hardness of approximately 40 Shore A or less is preferred for many applications to provide oral comfort. It will be apparent to the skilled artisan that harder materials may be employed in the acoustic waveguides used in conjunction with the power toothbrushes of the present invention; however, harder materials may provide a progressively unpleasant mouth feel. The waveguide material may have isotropic or anisotropic properties or, in an alternative embodiment, may comprise one material having isotropic properties and another material having anisotropic properties.
• The present invention also contemplates that more than one material may be used in combination to achieve acoustic waveguides having preferred properties of hardness and mouth feel and providing an acoustic impedance matching function. Different materials may be provided as multiple layers forming a unitary component, or different materials may be provided in selected locations to impart desired material and acoustic properties, the latter including, for example, focusing of the ultrasound emitted from the transducer to a point at and near the average distance from the distal tip of the waveguide to the tooth surfaces within the interproximal space and/or the lingal or buccal surfaces of the teeth. For example, additional acoustic matching elements may be embedded or stratified within the acoustic waveguide structure and be in operable contact with the ultrasonic transducer via one or more matching layers. Within certain embodiments, acoustic waveguides of the present invention further provide a matching layer at the waveguide tip to help coupling into low impedance toothpaste emulsions (e.g., dental fluid). Ideally, there will also be a significant specific acoustic impedance change between the sides of the acoustic waveguide and the surrounding medium such that the waves are not coupled substantially into the surrounding medium by the sides of the acoustic waveguide. In one embodiment, a matching layer of graphite, mineral, or metal-filled epoxy is provided between a ceramic transducer element and the waveguide. Another embodiment may combine the functions of a matching layer and waveguide by fabricating a stratified part with varying acoustical impedance in the direction of wave propagation. The variation in acoustical impedance of the acoustic waveguide may be a linear or nonlinear function.
• Exemplified herein are prototype transducer assemblies having a graphite impedance matching layer in operable contact with a piezoelectric ultrasonic transducer. As shown inFIG. 9A, awaveguide assembly150A may include agraphite core portion152A or similar material that may be inserted into an injection mold, and an elastomerouter portion154A molded or otherwise provided around it using, for example, the process of insert molding. Alternatively, a multishot technique may be used to create a gradient of materials with different acoustic and elastomeric properties. As used herein, the term “multishot” refers to the placement of several shots of thermoplastic material into one mold. This process may be employed, for example, in acoustic waveguide embodiments in which a first relatively hard material layer (e.g., about Shore 80 hardness or greater) is in operable proximity to the ultrasonic transducer element; a second, relatively soft material layer (e.g., between aboutShore 20 and Shore 80) is immediately adjacent to and in contact with the first material layer; and a third, still softer (e.g., aboutShore 20 hardness or less) material layer is immediately adjacent to and in contact with the second layer, for a very gentle feel against teeth. These exemplary acoustic waveguide designs may either be formed as individual pieces or, alternatively, they may be molded in combination with the material forming the toothbrush head and/or the support for the bristles.
• In preferred embodiments, acoustic waveguides of the present invention are substantially free from unfilled or gas-filled voids. To the extent that multiple materials are used to form a waveguide, those materials generally contact each other closely without allowing the formation of air gaps between surfaces. For some embodiments, however, it may be desirable to form one or more voids in the acoustic waveguide and substantially fill the voids with a material that has good acoustic transmission properties at the ultrasound operating parameters described herein.
• Thus, within certain embodiments, acoustic waveguides of the present invention may comprise two or more plastic/elastomer layers. For example, acoustic waveguides comprising three, four, and/or five plastic/elastomer layers are contemplated for certain applications. Such acoustic waveguides may further comprise one or more inserted pieces for shaping the acoustic properties and optimizing sonic properties. One function of an acoustic waveguide used in combination with an ultrasound transducer is to focus the ultrasound, as described above. In one embodiment, rigid or semi-rigid layer may be positioned in front of (distal to) the matching layer to provide improved acoustic properties. Using this type of intermediate layer allows a lower durometer elastomer waveguide to provide a softer feel to the teeth under sonic conditions, which is preferred for some embodiments.
• Referring now toFIGS. 9A-9H, it will be appreciated by the artisan that acoustic waveguides may be formed in any of a variety of three-dimensional shapes or geometries. For example,FIG. 9A shows awaveguide150A having a generally curved and tapered geometry. The two opposing sidewalls ofwaveguide150A taper from a wider base portion to a narrower tip portion and are generally planar, having a symmetrical curved profile. The taper angle, defined as the angle between a line extending perpendicularly from the base and the sidewall, is generally from about 0.5° to about 20°, more generally from about 1° to about 10°, and the taper angle of each side wall is generally substantially similar and in an opposite direction. The distal face ofwaveguide150A is generally symmetrically curved and generally semi-circular. In alternative embodiments, the waveguide edge may be asymmetrically curved or may form multiple curved apexes having the same or different dimensions and configurations.
• FIG. 9B illustrates analternative waveguide150B having a generally rectangular portion and a converging or wedge-shapedportion152B. The generally rectangular portion forms a base that is mounted in proximity to the acoustic waveguide. The taper angle of the side walls forming the wedge-shapedportion152B is generally from about 5° to about 65°, more generally from about 10° to about 45°, and the taper angle of each side wall is generally substantially similar and in an opposite direction. The faces of the side walls are generally rectangular rather than presenting a curved profile. The edges of the sidewalls may be chamfered or curved to provide a softer mouth feel. In the embodiment illustrated, the base portion and the tapered portion are generally equivalent in height. It will be appreciated that the relative dimensions of each portion may vary, depending on the properties of the materials used, the physical and geometrical properties of the underlying ultrasound transducer, and the acoustic transmission properties desired.
• FIG. 9C shows analternative waveguide150C, wherein a converging portion comprises a plurality ofsections152C that may be separated bygaps154C. The waveguide sections and gaps may be spaced symmetrically or asymmetrically and may have uniform or different sizes. In other words, one or more of the waveguide sections may have a different profile or different dimensions than other waveguide sections and, likewise, the waveguide gaps may be non-uniform. Similarly, although waveguide sections and gaps are shown having generally rectilinear faces and profiles, alternative profiles may have curved or rounded components.
• FIG. 9D shows analternative waveguide150D having a generally round base suitable for use in combination with a generally round ultrasound transducer and a bullet-shapedbody152D withminor protuberances154D to promote fluid flow.Protuberances154D are arranged in a generally radially symmetrical arrangement around the circumference of bullet-shapedbody152D and are arranged along a curved path. The protuberances taper from a narrower width at the smaller diameter portion of the bullet-shaped body to a larger width at the larger diameter portion of the bullet-shaped body. Although three protuberances are illustrated, it will be appreciated that a greater number of protuberances may be provides in a generally radially symmetrical arrangement.
• FIG. 9E shows analternative waveguide150E having tapered side walls and a convergingportion152E having a curved, generally centrally locatedapex154E formed on the distal face. It will be appreciated that, although a simple, centrally placedcurved apex154E is shown, it may be desirable in some circumstances to provide a more complex curved apex or curved distal faces having other symmetrical or asymmetrical configurations.
• FIG. 9F shows analternative waveguide150F that is conically shaped.FIG. 9G shows analternative waveguide150G that is biconical.FIG. 9H shows analternative waveguide150H having a plurality of pyramid-shapedportions152H. Certain design considerations regarding selection of an appropriate waveguide geometry will now be discussed. The shape of the waveguides may be selected, for example, to achieve a particular compression and/or focusing of the acoustic waves.
• Within certain embodiments of the present invention, acoustic waveguides are capable of acoustic coherent focusing of the ultrasonic waves transmitted from the ultrasonic transducer. Acoustic coherent focusing may be achieved, for example, by curving the waveguide tip wherein the tip comprises a conductive medium having a known sound speed. Alternatively, a section of ultrasound-conducting polymer having a known wave speed may be added to the end of a curved waveguide to nearly complete focusing before entering a medium of variable sound speed (e.g., dispersive bubbly medium). Within such embodiments, a single curve may be employed to achieve a single focus, whereas a scalloped curve is useful for producing multiple foci.
• Within alternative embodiments, acoustic waveguides are capable of acoustic incoherent focusing of the ultrasonic waves transmitted from the ultrasonic transducer. Acoustic incoherent focusing may be achieved, for example, by conical or wedge shapes that conduct sound into a progressively smaller area in a semicoherent manner such that intensity increases. Alternatively, multiple conical tips may be employed to provide multiple areas of higher acoustic intensity.
• Suitable acoustic waveguides may also adopt a propeller-like geometry such as a standard propeller design or a spiral design. Alternatively, an acoustic waveguide may have a hinged hydrofoil-like shape wherein its motion creates fluid lift and consequent fluid flow. The acoustic waveguide may have a generally smooth exterior surface, or the exterior surface may be rough or irregular. In some embodiments, the acoustic waveguide may be designed and fabricated to promote removal of plaque by direct contact of portions of the acoustic waveguide with teeth. Contact of the waveguide with tooth surfaces may be provided by altering the three-dimensional surface of the waveguide, such as by providing protrusions on waveguide surfaces, or by mounting or embedding protrusions, such as fibers and the like, on waveguide surfaces. Acoustic waveguides of the present invention may include, for example, embedded bristle filaments, squeegee-shaped protrusions, molded or shaped protrusions similar to bristles, fibers, or the like. The protrusions or attached fibers may be arranged in an ordered pattern, or they may be randomly arranged. In alternative embodiments, the waveguide surface may be provided with regularly or irregularly spaced depressions. These features may additionally or alternatively ensure that a specified separation distance is maintained between the tooth surface and the bulk surface of the acoustic waveguide. This feature may find application in those applications wherein it is desired to minimize direct transmission of ultrasound into the tooth structure and/or if bubble activation occurs at a distance from the end of the acoustic waveguide and a spacing device is needed to maintain this distance.
• Regardless of the precise material and/or geometry, acoustic waveguides of the present invention are fabricated to generate fluid flow when moved on a toothbrush head. The desired fluid motion and transmission of ultrasound into the dental fluid may be achieved, for example, by employing a flexible mechanical protrusion that extends into the dental fluid. In such cases, motion of the acoustic waveguide may be side-to-side or oscillatory or rotational.
• When acoustic waveguide motion is rotational, the motion may be generally about or parallel to a longitudinal axis of the waveguide and may be achieved with a wedge or cone, multiple wedges or cones in cross or star patterns, a pinwheel, and/or multiple wedges in a star pattern without a center. Alternatively, rotational motion may be about the axis along the toothbrush head, as may be achieved with a wedge- or rectangular-shaped acoustic waveguide.
• Acoustic waveguides can also be designed to increase the intensity of acoustic energy delivered to the surface of the teeth and gums. For example, an acoustic waveguide can be designed to contain and compress the propagating acoustic energy into a smaller physical area. If the waveguide is designed with materials of low acoustic attenuation and with appropriate sound speed, the quantity of energy delivered from the end of the waveguide will be comparable to that transmitted into the waveguide, but can be compressed into a smaller area and will therefore have a higher energy density and/or acoustic intensity. Waveguide tip motion creates an “acoustic painting” effect to broadly distribute acoustic energy.
• In addition to low attenuation, waveguides are generally designed to channel the acoustic energy along the waveguide, and transmit or “leak” a minimum of acoustic energy into the surrounding medium before it has propagated to the end of the waveguide. One method for achieving this is to use a material having a sound speed substantially lower than the surrounding fluid and having shallow slopes on the sides of the waveguide (e.g., wedge shaped). The shallow slope of the waveguide walls causes the propagating waves to contact the waveguide and fluid interface at low grazing angles. Because the wavelength in the waveguide is shorter than that of the surrounding medium, the waves will only couple into less efficient subharmonic modes where the launch angle is defined by the ratio of multiples of waveguide wavelengths to surrounding media wavelengths. These poorly coupled modes of transmission into the fluid do not extract large amounts of energy from the waveguide.
• The combination of containing, transmitting, and compressing acoustic energy enables the generation of high intensity acoustic fields at the waveguide tip and improves the efficiency of acoustic energy delivery. Therefore, lower electrical power levels are required to generate appropriate acoustic intensities for bubble activation.FIGS. 2A-2D (for a rectangular waveguide124),FIGS. 3A-3F (for a wedge-shapedwaveguide124X), andFIGS. 4A-4D (for a wedge-shaped waveguide having acurved end124Y) show finite element model and simulation results illustrating waveguides designed to compress the acoustic field.FIG. 2A shows a general, simplified model of atoothbrush head120 according to the present invention, as discussed in detail above.FIG. 2B shows the corresponding portions of the finite element model used to model thetoothbrush head120, including astem121′, anultrasonic transducer122′, animpedance matching layer129′, and awaveguide124′. Plots showing the wave field soon after transmission showing propagation in the waveguide are shown inFIGS. 2C, 3C,3E, and4C for selected waveguides. These figures evidence a low level of leakage into the surrounding fluid.FIGS. 2D, 3D,3F, and4D show a wave field plot later, after transmission, at which time the ultrasonic wave front is compressed into the tip of the waveguide and the transmission into fluid emulsion is primarily from the waveguide tip.
• In addition to increasing the acoustic intensity delivered by compressing the acoustic field, the waveguide can be designed to coherently focus energy into surrounding media beyond the tip of the waveguide. This is accomplished by shaping the end of the acoustic waveguide to create an acoustic lens effect that will focus the waves from the waveguide into a higher intensity field beyond the waveguide. This focusing effect can be achieved with one or multiple waveguide materials combined together and shaped to create a focused field. For instance, a low attenuation, higher sound speed material may be used at the end of the waveguide to continue propagating and focusing the wave front before the wave front emerges into the higher attenuation toothpaste emulsion. As with the acoustic field compression described above, the increased acoustic intensity achieved with the focusing effect improves the device efficiency. Therefore, size, weight, power, and costs are reduced and battery life is extended for a final device.
• Still further embodiments provide that the acoustic waveguide may be configured to exhibit improved fluid propulsion properties when used in a power toothbrush head in combination with a sonic component either with or without an ultrasonic component.
• The waveguide may be positioned having its longest dimension generally aligned with the longitudinal axis of the toothbrush head, as shown inFIG. 2A, and the waveguide may be configured to approximate the contour of tooth surfaces throughout the mouth, the location of which is not easily perceived by the user and conversely the location of which is not required to be known by the user for effective cleaning. Such an orientation is generally less dependent on user brushing technique/style and allows the user to brush as he/she would without concern about the waveguide location.
• Alternatively, the waveguide may be positioned with its longest dimension generally transverse to longitudinal axis of the toothbrush head, which allows the waveguide to drop into the interproximal space and provide tactile feedback to the user such that the user may index movement from one interproximal space to the next, thus providing cleaning induced by the ultrasound interproximally—where it is needed most beyond the bristles. In this orientation, the waveguide may rely on the natural tendency of fluid to fill the interproximal space in the oral cavity due to wetting of adjacent surfaces and wicking of fluid. Such an orientation may be less reliant on the brush head to carry the fluid and position it at the tip of the waveguide. Rather, it takes advantage of the waveguide's penetration of the interproximal space and activation of bubbles in the fluid naturally found in that location. In another embodiment, the acoustic waveguide may be oriented obliquely with respect to the longitudinal axis of the brush head. The waveguide may be positioned at the end of the brush head such that it can be effectively used either on the facial or lingual surface, as well as on the posterior surfaces of the molar teeth.
• In addition to the functions performed by the acoustic waveguide as described above, the waveguide, regardless of orientation, may additionally function to: (a) act as a standoff to prevent the user from using too much force when applying the bristles against the teeth, thereby reducing the incidence of gingival damage from excessive force during brushing; (b) act as a scrubbing agent, thus cleansing the tooth surface, and as such may contain a surface texture to enhance; (c) act as a gum massaging agent, thus stimulating the gums (as often recommended by the dental professional) to reduce swelling and to help contour the tissue; (d) act as an agent to stimulate saliva flow, particularly of interest to individuals with xerostomia.
The Sonic Component
• Within certain embodiments, toothbrushes of the present invention comprise a sonic component16 (see,FIG. 1A) in combination with theacoustic waveguide24 and/orultrasonic transducer22, described above. Typically, asonic component16 comprises a motor assembly that generates sonic vibrations that are transmitted to the toothbrush head, thereby causing vibration of theacoustic waveguide24 and/or bristletufts26. Such sonic vibrations generate bubbly flow within the dental fluid. For example, by employing asonic component16, theacoustic waveguide24 can be made to lift and push dental fluid towards the teeth as well as interproximal and subgingival spaces, with an associated fluid flow of sufficient pressure and shear force to cause the erosion of plaque. A vibratingacoustic waveguide24 of the present invention is capable of moving fluid, including bubbly fluid, with sufficient velocity and focus to achieve plaque removal from teeth several millimeters beyond thebristles26 of thetoothbrush head20. Motor assemblies that may be suitably employed in the toothbrushes of the present invention are well known and readily available to those of skill in the art, and are exemplified by the toothbrush head drive mechanisms presented within U.S. Pat. No. 5,987,681, Pat. No. 6,421,865, Pat. No. 6,421,866, Pat. No. RE 36,669, and U.S. Patent Publication Nos. 2002/0095734, No. 2002/0116775, No. 2002/0124333, and No. 2003/0079304. Each of these U.S. Patents and Patent Applications is hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
• Toothbrushes of the present invention are capable of generating fluid flows at a range of about 1 cm/sec to about 50 cm/sec at a distance of between about 1 mm and 10 mm beyond the toothbrush bristle tips and/or acoustic waveguide. More typically, toothbrushes of the present invention are capable of generating fluid flows at a range of about 2 cm/sec to about 30 cm/sec at a distance of between about 1 mm and 10 mm beyond the toothbrush bristle tips and/or acoustic waveguide. Exemplified herein are toothbrushes that are capable of generating fluid flows of about 10 cm/sec at a distance of between about 1 mm and 10 mm beyond the toothbrush bristle tips and/or acoustic waveguide.
• It will be recognized by those skilled in the art that the generation of bubbly flow by the sonic actions on theacoustic waveguide24 does not require theultrasonic component16 described above. It is, however, the combination of theultrasonic transducer22,acoustic waveguide24, andsonic component16 that together comprise atoothbrush head20 in either removable or fixed combination, with ahandle15 to achieve a preferred power toothbrush embodiment of the present invention. It is this combination of sonic and ultrasonic components that yields the most surprising benefits of improved microscopic bubbly flow properties in combination with enhanced cavitation and acoustic microstreaning. These physical properties provide superior cleaning properties of this embodiment of the present invention. That is, the ultrasonic and sonic components, when used in combination to achieve toothbrush designs disclosed herein, yield synergistic cleaning effects that are substantially superior to the additive effects of the sonic and ultrasonic components in isolation. For example, theacoustic waveguide24 can be optimized to move bubbly fluid whose bubbles could facilitate acoustic streaming (thereby further enhancing the fluid flow generated by the waveguide alone) as well as acoustic microstreaming and cavitation.
• The primary function of the sonic motion is to activate the bristle tips such that they cleanse the tooth surface via direct bristle contact. This motion also relates to the user's primary perception of cleaning during a typical brushing event. In the implementation of the combined effect of sonic and ultrasonic cleaning, sonic bristle motion is also used to generate bubbles within the dental fluid surrounding the waveguide. Furthermore, the sonic motion propels dental slurry (including the fluid and the bubbles) towards the surface of the teeth. This fluid motion towards the teeth both acts to clean the teeth by dislodging plaque bacteria and debris as well as propel the bubbles to the tooth surface where they can be acted upon by the ultrasound. This bulk fluid motion—itself enhanced by an optimally configured waveguide, with or without ultrasound transmission—can also carry maximally oxygenated dental fluid into the gingival and sub-gingival region, with a therapeutic effect resulting from the reduction of anaerobic plaque and other bacteria that reside in those regions.
• The gaseous substance within bubbles in a dental fluid is typically air found within the oral cavity during brushing. Movement of the bristles, waveguide, and/or other brush head components through the air/fluid interface (fluid may be saliva, water, dentifrice, mouthwash and/or other present during typical brushing) acts to fracture this interface entrapping bubbles within the fluid. With respect to cleaning the tooth surface with shear induced by cavitation and/or acoustic streaming, the positive benefits of ultrasound are achieved when bubbles within the fluid are stimulated to create cavitation and/or streaming. It is desirable to use the sonic component of the toothbrush to generate these bubbles within the dental slurry.
• The dental slurry acts as both the source of the bubbles to be activated by the ultrasound and as an ultrasound coupling media (transfer of ultrasound from waveguide tip to the tooth surface, which may be a gap from 0 to 10 mm, more typically 1 to 5 mm). If there is insufficient bristle and/or waveguide motion, too few bubbles are created within the dental slurry and the cleaning effect of the ultrasound on the tooth surface is reduced. If there are too many bubbles created in the dental fluid, the fraction of air within the coupling media is too large, preventing the passage of ultrasound from the waveguide tip to the tooth surface and reducing the cleaning effect on the tooth surface.
Dentifrice Design and Compositions
• Within certain related embodiments, it is contemplated to provide a dentifrice that is particularly suitable for use with the inventive power toothbrush described herein. For example, it is herein contemplated that such a dentifrice will facilitate the creation of a desirable bubble population that may be acted upon by theultrasonic transducer22 andacoustic waveguide24 disclosed herein.
• The natural bubble population within a dental fluid can be assayed by the tendency of that fluid to absorb ultrasonic energy that is transmitted through it. The higher the absorption, the more bubbles that are present at the relevant size (given heuristically by the resonance formula, developed originally for bubbles in pure water at 37 degrees Celsius, although applicable as an approximation for more general conditions F₀R₀=3.26, where the frequency F₀is given in MHz and the radius R₀of the bubble is given in microns), although many bubbles off-resonance would also create desired plaque and stain removal effects.
• A typical composition of dental slurry is 17% dentifrice in fluid. The fluid may be, in part, water added to the toothbrush prior to brushing, but, more typically, the fluid is largely saliva generated by the user during brushing. Components within the dentifrice (e.g., detergents, humectants, thickeners, etc.) influence the formation of bubbles within the dental slurry. Dentifrices according to the present invention facilitate the formation of bubbles having a diameter of between about 1 μm and about 150 μm within the dental fluid that resonate when ultrasound is applied in the 20 kHz to 3 MHz frequency range. More typically, dentifrices according to the present invention facilitate the formation of bubbles having a diameter of between about 1 μm and about 100 μm within the dental fluid that resonate when ultrasound is applied in the 30 kHz to 3 MHz frequency range. Still more typically, dentifrices according to the present invention facilitate the formation of bubbles having a diameter of between about 5 μm and about 30 μm within the dental fluid that resonate when ultrasound is applied in the 100 kHz to 600 kHz frequency range. In an exemplary dentifrice presented herein, bubbles that have a diameter of between about 12 μm and about 26 μm are formed in the dental fluid and resonate when ultrasound is applied to those bubbles with an ultrasound transducer operating in the 250 kHz to 500 kHz range.
• Dentifrices suitable for use with the toothbrushes disclosed herein comprise a surfactant that produces surface tension values that facilitate production and stabilization of bubbles in a suitable size range for stimulation by the ultrasonic transducer in combination with an acoustic waveguide. Typically, surfactants employed in the dentifrices disclosed herein produce surface tensions in the range of about 0.1 Pa to about 500 Pa, more typically in the range of about 0.2 Pa to 250 Pa, and still more typically in the range of about 0.5 Pa to about 50 Pa.
• Alternatively, or in addition to providing a dentifrice as described above that promotes bubble formation, bubbles having a desired size range may be incorporated in a dentifrice or another composition and introduced directly into the oral cavity by application of the composition on a toothbrush or by introduction of the composition into the oral cavity. Bubbles having a diameter of between about 1 μm and about 150 μm, more typically between about 1 μm and about 100 μm, in some embodiments between about 5 μm and about 30 μm, and in yet other embodiments between about 12 μm and about 26 μm may be incorporated directly in a dentifrice composition or in another composition, such as a mouthwash or another generally liquid, gel-like or semi-solid carrier for delivery to the oral cavity.
• Bubbles in the carrier material may be present as voids in the composition itself, or as microspheres or other microstructures forming gas-filled voids in the carrier material. The OPTISON™ ultrasound contrast enhancing composition, for example, comprises a suspension of microspheres having a mean diameter of 2.0-4.5 μm, the microspheres being formed from human serum albumin and being filled with an octafluoropropane gas. A population of microspheres of the desired size range (as described above), formed using a material that's safe for human consumption and generally inert, and filled with a gas that's safe for human consumption and generally inert may be incorporated in a suitable carrier material and used, in conjunction with toothbrushes of the present invention, to promote effective cleaning.
• The following examples are provided to exemplify, but not to limit, the presently disclosed invention.
EXAMPLESExample 1Design and Construction of a Combined Sonic and Ultrasonic Toothbrush
• Prototype power toothbrushes were generated by replacing internal bristle tufts of commercially available power toothbrushes with an ultrasonic transducer and acoustic waveguide. Ultrasonic transducers employed in these prototype toothbrushes had significant power output within the frequency range of about 150 to about 510 (generally 500) kHz that was sufficient to stimulate the formation of an acoustically significant bubble population susceptible to resonant stimulation by energy emitted by the ultrasonic transducer. A polymer waveguide was molded onto the toothbrush head in operable proximity to the ultrasonic transducer and positioned such that ultrasonic waves generated by the ultrasonic transducer were propagated and focused.
• Several acoustic waveguides were used experimentally and were located generally in the center of and along the longitudinal axis of the brushhead. The most common dimensions were: length=11.4 mm; width=3.1 mm; maximum height at the center of a curved end face=7.4 mm; height at the edges of a curved end face=4.3 mm. The ultrasound operating parameters generally used experimentally were: 250 kHz frequency; 1-10% duty cycle; 10-1,000 cycles/second and PRF=1-500.
Example 2Ultrasonic Imaging and Plaque Removal by an Exemplary Ultrasonic Power Toothbrush
• This example discloses ultrasound imaging and plaque removal data collected for one of the prototype power toothbrushes described in Example 1.
• In order to demonstrate the improved performance of a power toothbrush employing an ultrasonic transducer in combination with an acoustic waveguide, Doppler, and B-mode data were collected for a prototype ultrasonic toothbrush with and without incorporating an acoustic waveguide.FIG. 5A presents an ultrasound image of an ultrasonic toothbrush without an acoustic waveguide. Doppler data show fluid flow (within box) and B-mode data highlight acoustic backscatter (outside of box) at the bristle tips (BT) and bristle plate (BP) at bottom of bristles.FIG. 5B presents the same ultrasonic toothbrush with moving bristles powered by a sonic component. These data reveal that fluid flow (FF) beyond the bristle tips is not detectable even though the bristles are moving (MB).FIG. 5C presents an ultrasound B-mode image of a prototype ultrasonic toothbrush in combination with an acoustic waveguide. The sonic component drives the vibration of the acoustic waveguide and generates a jet of bubbly fluid moving away from the brush.FIG. 5D presents Doppler and B-mode ultrasound image data of the same toothbrush showing significant fluid flow (FF) and bubbles (B) beyond the bristles.
• A prototype ultrasonic power toothbrush was tested for plaque removal in a plaque coated (Streptococcus mutans) artificial tooth model system. Plaque was detected by staining a set of artificial teeth before application of fluid flow generated by an acoustic waveguide, without ultrasound, positioned several millimeters beyond the toothbrush head bristle tips. Discrete plaque colonies were reduced or removed after application of fluid flow generated by the ultrasonic transducer in combination with the acoustic waveguide.
• An artificial tooth model for tooth areas outside the reach of a toothbrush head bristle tip was also tested. Plaque was dyed pink before application of ultrasonic energy from several millimeters beyond the bristle tips. Discrete plaque colonies were reduced or removed after application of ultrasound. Background films of plaque were also reduced, leaving residual pink due primarily to dye that has leached into the teeth. Plaque removal in the same model system was also tested after application of fluid flow generated by an acoustic waveguide and after application of ultrasonic energy from several millimeters beyond the bristles. Discrete plaque colonies were reduced or removed after treatment. Background films of plaque were also reduced, leaving residual pink due primarily to dye that has leached into the teeth. Superior results were achieved while simultaneously using microscopic fluid flow from the acoustic waveguide and ultrasound.
• Example 3
Measurement of Physical Parameters of an Exemplary Ultrasonic Power Toothbrush Employing an Acoustic Waveguide
• This example discloses measurements of physical parameters of an exemplary ultrasonic power toothbrush of the present invention.
• In order to compare the effectiveness of various acoustic waveguide geometries, the transmitting pressures for a flat, unfocused elastomeric/silicone polymer wedge waveguide (FIG. 3) was compared to the transmitting pressures for a focused elastomeric/silicone polymer wedge waveguide (FIG. 4). The plot of acoustic pressure levels at the tip of each acoustic waveguide presented inFIG. 6 demonstrates an approximately three-fold increase in transmitting pressure for a focused waveguide (˜1.5 MPa tip pressure) versus an unfocused waveguide (˜0.5 MPa tip pressure).
• The absorption of ultrasound transmitted through a model dental fluid/bubble emulsion was measured as a function of ultrasonic frequency in the 30 to 700 kHz frequency range. Ultrasonic transducers were positioned, approximately 0.3 to 1 cm apart, on opposite sides of a Petri dish containing simulated dental fluid (i.e., an emulsification of dentifrice and water) and the intensity of sound transmitted through the fluid was measured and normalized by the intensity of sound transmitted into the fluid. Results of an exemplary test are presented inFIG. 7, which reveals a peak in attenuation due to absorption of sound at approximately 200 kHz and a spurious dip in the curve at approximately 350 kHz, owing to resonance between the length of the ultrasound wave and the depth of the fluid. These data demonstrated the presence of a significant bubble population available for acoustic stimulation at frequencies between 100-500 kHz.
Example 4Plague Removal by an Exemplary Ultrasonic Power Toothbrush
• This example discloses plaque removal with the bubbly jet generated by the sonic vibration of an acoustic waveguide in combination with ultrasound stimulation of the bubbles within the jet.
• AStreptococcus mutansmodel for dental plaque was employed to assess plaque removal by an exemplary ultrasonic toothbrush of the present invention.S. mutans(human-derived plaque) was allowed to grow on frosted glass slides, then exposed to a prototype toothbrush operated at the surface of a water bath and held a few millimeters away from, in a perpendicular fashion, the surface of the slide. A variety of ultrasound protocols were used, including waveguide only (WG) and waveguide plus ultrasound (WG/US). The slides were stained with a plaque-specific dye to indicate intact plaque (pink) and plaque-free regions (white).
• In an exemplary assay, the surface of anS. mutans-coated slide was placed 4 mm from the longest bristles of a prototype toothbrush. The ultrasound carrier frequency was 250 kHz, with a PRF of 1000 Hz and with 24 cycles per burst; the Mechanical Index was 0.75. With only the bubbly fluid jet produced by the acoustic waveguide, there was a subtle reduction in the thickness of the plaque, while in concert with ultrasound, significant plaque was removed. For comparison, a commercially available power toothbrush was held at the same distance from plaque grown on the frosted glass slide. That control toothbrush did not remove meaningful plaque.
• A second assay system used hydroxyapatite (HA) disks incubated for48 hours prior to the experiment withS. Mutans.The ultrasound protocol consisted of a 250 kHz run at 625 Hz PRF, 40 cycles/sec, 3 second exposure, and a Mechanical Index of 0.9 measured at 6 mm from the tip of the acoustic waveguide.
• The action of the acoustic waveguide alone removed some plaque; however, in combination with ultrasound, there was significantly improved plaque removal. By comparison, a commercially available power toothbrush did not remove any plaque, while ultrasound alone removed only a few spots of plaque, in a small region of the disk.
• In a third experimental system, an ultrasound protocol was followed that consisted of a 510 kHz run at 1,252 Hz PRF, with 2 cycles/sec, exposed for 3 seconds, with a Mechanical Index of 0.51 measured at 6 mm from the tip of the waveguide. Consistent with the assays described above, the action of the acoustic waveguide alone removed some plaque; but, in combination with ultrasound, there was significantly improved plaque removal. By comparison, a commercially available power toothbrush, held 1-2 mm away from the front of the teeth, removed only some plaque, while ultrasound alone only removed a few spots of plaque in a small region of the disk. Thus, the bubbly fluid jet generated by the sonically vibrating acoustic waveguide was sufficient to achieve more rapid plaque removal beyond the reach of the bristles by a factor of at least two-fold greater than the commercial power toothbrush.
• Plaque removal was observed across a wide range of acoustic protocols. Optimal plaque removal was achieved when the PRF was a multiple, greater than one, of the sonic frequency. Without wishing to be bound to any specific theory of operation, it is believed that this protocol resulted in optimal plaque removal because it allowed multiple pulses of ultrasound to interact with the bubbly jet and the plaque as the flexible tip of the acoustic waveguide was being oscillated back and forth across the face of the HA disk, relevant portion of the glass slides, and/or the teeth. It is further believed that this accounts, at least in part, to the synergistic effect observed with the combined action of a bubbly fluid jet and ultrasound.
• In order to demonstrate this synergistic effect, the action of ultrasound alone on a tooth/model of plaque removal was assessed both with and without motion of the acoustic waveguide. An ultrasound protocol was chosen that, by itself, did not yield meaningful plaque removal (with or without the production of a bubbly jet), but did so after introduction of dental fluid containing artificial bubbles (Optison™). The results of this study also demonstrated that ultrasound alone was not responsible for plaque removal; but, rather, it was the ultrasound stimulation of the artificial bubbles that, in combination, yielded substantial plaque removal.
• Additional studies performed in an artificial tooth dental plaque model for tooth areas beyond the reach of the toothbrush's bristles demonstrated that a sonically vibrating acoustic waveguide simultaneously emitting ultrasound at 450 kHz in the presence of artificial bubbles removed plaque from a distance of 2-3 mm after only 5 seconds of application, although that plaque removal pattern actually appeared within a fraction of a second of ultrasound onset. This plaque removal occurred over a larger area than with ultrasound alone and occurred in an appreciably shorter length of time than that created by the bubbly fluid jet alone. Therefore, the ultrasound and sonically generated bubbly fluid flow acted together in a synergistic fashion to rapidly and effectively remove plaque over a large area, beyond the reach of the bristles.
• Because a bubble's volume oscillates and associated stresses act on a time scale governed by the ultrasound frequency, the frequencies (on the order of 100s of kHz), plaque removal can, in principle, occur on time scales on the order of 0.00001 seconds (i.e., approximately 10 microseconds). Therefore, ultrasound toothbrushes of the present invention are capable of substantial plaque removal at times that are approximately 100- to 1000-fold shorter than the time required for plaque removal by existing power toothbrushes.
Example 5Absence of Cell Lysis by an Exemplary Ultrasonic Power Toothbrush
• This example discloses that ultrasonic power toothbrushes of the present invention induces ultrasonic cavitation whose mechanical effects were insufficient to induce cell lysis, yet were able to remove plaque. These findings support the safety of ultrasonic power toothbrushes provided herein.
• A red blood cell model system was utilized (FIG. 8) to test cell lysis caused by shear stresses induced by acoustic microstreaming associated with stable oscillating bubbles by Rooney,Science169:869-871 (1970), who demonstrated that a single bubble, placed within a vial of dilute red blood cells, could be stimulated by ultrasound to produce “microstreaming” such that with sufficient acoustic power, those blood cells could be disrupted. In particular, a thin, hollow wire with air in its center was placed in a vial of suspended red blood cells. Sufficient air was extruded from the wire to form a hemisphere of gas (the microbubble) within the suspension. Ultrasonic waves at a frequency of about 25 kHz were applied to the container to stimulate oscillation of the bubbles and sufficient to generate acoustic microstreaming. Under these conditions, about 70% of the red blood cells were destroyed at shear stresses comparable to those determined via independent means. One hundred percent hemolysis was achieved by introduction of a highly osmotic solution. Of particular interest here is the difference in shear stress (greater than 450 Pa) necessary to break up the cells, versus stress necessary to remove fresh plaque in vitro (1-30 Pa). The shear required for detachment ofP. aeruginosabiofilms grown at shear stresses of 0.075 and 5.09 Pa were 5.09 Pa and 25.3 Pa, respectively. Stoodley et al.,Journal of Industrial Microbiology&Biotechnology29:361-367 (2002).
• Acoustic microstreaming, just one of a variety of physical processes associated with acoustic cavitation (the formation and/or stimulation of bubbles by acoustic energy), can cause disruption of biological systems such as red blood cells, as discussed herein. Of particular interest is that the presence of bubbles can facilitate stresses sufficient to remove plaque, for example, at acoustic intensities far below that necessary to cause desired biological effects, when no bubbles are present. In the present example, Optison™, a microbubble ultrasound (US) contrast agent with a diameter of about one micron, was used to demonstrate this point. This example also shows that it is the ultrasound stimulation of bubbles, not ultrasound cavitation alone, that removes plaque.
• As evidence for the safety of ultrasonic toothbrushes of the present invention, the following plaque removal assay system was employed. Cell disruption by an exemplary toothbrush was determined by assaying cell debris in the liquid above plated gingival cells that were exposed to (1) an activated commercial power toothbrush whose bristle tips were placed above the cells, (2) a bubbly fluid jet caused by the sonic component of the prototype toothbrush held above the cells, and (3) the combination of bubbly fluid jet and ultrasound (sonic plus ultrasound) from the prototype toothbrush, held above the cells. These results were compared to the results achieved with a commercial power toothbrush whose bristle tips were placed directly on the cells.
• Following treatment, supernatants were evaluated for lysed cells by a nonradioactive lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay (Cytotox 96; Promega, Madison, Wis.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. This assay system is a calorimetric alternative to⁵¹Cr release cytotoxicity assays and has been used to measure cell lysis by chemical and physical means. Singer et al.,J. Neurosci.19:2455-2463 (1999). The assay quantitatively measures LDH, a stable cytosolic enzyme that is released upon cell lysis in much the same way as⁵¹Cr is released in radioactive assays. Released LDH in culture supernatants is measured with a 30-minute coupled enzymatic assay, which results in the conversion of a tetrazolium salt (INT) into a red formazan product. The amount of color formed is proportional to the number of lysed cells.
• Visible wavelength absorbance data were collected using a standard 96 well plate reader. Methods for determination of LDH utilizing tetrazolium salts in conjunction with diaphorase or alternate electron acceptors are well known in the art. Variations on this technology have been reported for measuring natural cytotoxicity and have been demonstrated to be identical (within experimental error) to values determined in parallel⁵¹Cr release assays.
• Cells remaining in plates following treatment were photographed, lysed, and quantified using the LDH assay as described above. Cell lysis induced by the beyond the bristle effects of a sonic toothbrush was compared to cell lysis induced by a prototype combined sonic/ultrasonic toothbrush of the present invention.
• Results of an exemplary assay are presented inFIG. 10, which demonstrate that the cleaning action of a bubbly fluid jet generated by an acoustic waveguide mounted on a toothbrush, in combination with ultrasound propagated through the acoustic waveguide, safely removed plaque. The “control” result was a measure of cell lysis caused by the fluid action generated beyond the reach of the bristles of a commercial power toothbrush; the “sonic” result was a measure of such cell lysis by an exemplary toothbrush without ultrasound; the “sonic+ultrasonic” result was a measure of such cell lysis by an exemplary toothbrush with both a sonic component and ultrasound; and the “control+contact” result was a measure of cell lysis by a commercial power toothbrush whose bristles were placed in direct contact with the cell surface. There were no differences detected between the commercial toothbrush and the prototypical toothbrush when their bristles did not touch the cells. In contrast, there was substantial cell lysis generated by the direct contact of the toothbrush bristles of a commercial power toothbrush upon the cells.
• While the preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described, it will be appreciated that various changes can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims (42)

1. A toothbrush comprising:

a toothbrush head including an acoustic waveguide and a plurality of bristle tufts projecting from a toothbrush head support structure, wherein the acoustic waveguide comprises a polymer having a durometer hardness less than 100 Shore A; and

an ultrasonic transducer acoustically coupled to the acoustic waveguide, wherein the ultrasonic transducer is adapted to oscillate at ultrasonic frequencies.

2. The toothbrush ofclaim 1, wherein the polymer has a durometer hardness between about 10 and about 65 Shore A.

3. The toothbrush ofclaim 1, wherein the polymer is silicone rubber.

4. The toothbrush ofclaim 1, wherein the ultrasonic transducer is mounted in the toothbrush head in proximity to the acoustic waveguide.

5. The toothbrush ofclaim 1, wherein the acoustic waveguide comprises a base structure mounted in the toothbrush head and a distal portion extending outwardly from the base structure.

6. The toothbrush ofclaim 5, wherein the base structure is larger cross-section than the distal portion.

7. The toothbrush ofclaim 1, wherein the acoustic waveguide is substantially rectangular in profile.

8. The toothbrush ofclaim 1, wherein the acoustic waveguide includes oppositely disposed side walls that are tapered and terminate distally in a waveguide face.

9. The toothbrush ofclaim 1, further comprising an impedance matching layer disposed between the ultrasonic transducer and the acoustic waveguide.

10. The toothbrush ofclaim 1, wherein the ultrasonic transducer comprises a plurality of piezoelectric elements.

11. The toothbrush ofclaim 10, wherein the plurality of piezoelectric elements are mechanically stacked and electrically connected in parallel.

12. The toothbrush ofclaim 11, wherein the plurality of piezoelectric elements comprise two piezoelectric elements.

13. The toothbrush ofclaim 12, further comprising at least one electrical contact contacting each of the piezoelectric elements.

14. The toothbrush ofclaim 1, wherein the ultrasonic transducer operates at an ultrasound carrier frequency in the range of about 100 kHz to about 750 kHz.

15. The toothbrush ofclaim 1, wherein the ultrasonic transducer operates at an ultrasound carrier frequency of less than about 750 kHz.

16. The toothbrush ofclaim 1, wherein the ultrasonic transducer operates at an ultrasound carrier frequency of less than about 500 kHz.

17. The toothbrush ofclaim 1, wherein during use the ultrasonic transducer oscillates periodically with a pulse repetition frequency of between about 0.5 Hz and about 225 Hz.

18. The toothbrush ofclaim 1, wherein the ultrasonic transducer oscillates periodically with a pulse repetition frequency of between about 5 Hz and about 1,500 Hz.

19. The toothbrush ofclaim 18, wherein the ultrasonic transducer operates with a duty cycle between about 5% and about 15%.

20. A toothbrush comprising:

an ultrasonic transducer adapted to operate within the following ranges of operating parameters during use: 100-750 kHz carrier frequency; 0.5-1500 Hz pulse repetition frequency (PRF); and 50-10,000 cycles/burst;

a plurality of bristle tufts projecting from a toothbrush head; and

an acoustic waveguide acoustically coupled to the ultrasonic transducer and projecting from the toothbrush head.

20. The toothbrush ofclaim 19, wherein the ultrasonic transducer operates at a mechanical index of less than 1.9.

21. The toothbrush ofclaim 19, wherein the ultrasonic transducer operates at a duty cycle of less than about 15%.

22. A toothbrush of claims19 wherein the ultrasonic transducer operates at a pulse repetition frequency (PRF) of from about 40-200 Hz.

23. A toothbrush ofclaim 19 wherein the ultrasonic transducer operates at a pulse repetition frequency (PRF) of less than about 20 Hz.

24. A toothbrush comprising:

a toothbrush head having an acoustic waveguide and a plurality of bristle tufts, the acoustic waveguide having at least two opposing faces terminating in a distal waveguide face; and

a sonic component coupled to the toothbrush head to vibrate the acoustic waveguide and the bristle tufts at a sonic acoustic frequency.

25. The toothbrush ofclaim 24, wherein the acoustic waveguide has tapered side walls forming generally a wedge-shaped waveguide, wherein a waveguide base portion has a larger cross-sectional area than the distal waveguide face.

26. The toothbrush ofclaim 24, wherein the distal waveguide face is curved.

27. The toothbrush ofclaim 24, wherein the distal waveguide face is generally convex.

28. The toothbrush ofclaim 24, wherein the acoustic waveguide has a hardness of approximately 40 Shore A or less.

29. The toothbrush ofclaim 24, wherein the acoustic waveguide is oriented generally parallel to a longitudinal axis of the toothbrush head.

30. The toothbrushclaim 24, wherein the acoustic waveguide is oriented generally transverse to a longitudinal axis of the toothbrush head.

31. A toothbrush head comprising a support structure, an acoustic waveguide and a plurality of bristle tufts projecting from the support structure, the acoustic waveguide having multiple opposing faces, with at least two opposing faces having walls terminating in a distal waveguide face; and

an ultrasonic transducer acoustically coupled to the acoustic waveguide and capable of producing ultrasonic energy at frequencies of less than about 1000 kHz.

32. A toothbrush head for mounting on a toothbrush handle, the toothbrush head comprising an acoustic waveguide, an ultrasonic transducer operably connected to the acoustic waveguide, and a plurality of bristle tufts projecting from a toothbrush head support structure, the acoustic waveguide having a generally block-like structure and having an exposed height that is greater than about 50% and less than about 120% of the exposed height of the bristle tufts.

33. The toothbrush ofclaim 32, wherein the acoustic waveguide comprises a polymer having a durometer hardness between about 10 and about 65 Shore A.

34. The toothbrush ofclaim 33, wherein the polymer is silicone rubber.

35. The toothbrush ofclaim 32, further comprising an impedance matching layer disposed between the ultrasonic transducer and the acoustic waveguide.

36. The toothbrush ofclaim 32, wherein the ultrasonic transducer comprises a plurality of piezoelectric elements.

37. The toothbrush ofclaim 36, wherein the plurality of piezoelectric elements are mechanically stacked and electrically connected in parallel.

38. The toothbrush ofclaim 37, wherein the plurality of piezoelectric elements comprise two piezoelectric elements.

39. The toothbrush ofclaim 37, further comprising at least one electrical contact contacting each of the piezoelectric elements.

40. The toothbrush ofclaim 32, wherein the ultrasonic transducer operates at an ultrasound carrier frequency in the range of about 100 kHz to about 750 kHz.

41. The toothbrush ofclaim 40, wherein the ultrasonic transducer oscillates periodically with a pulse repetition frequency of between about 0.5 Hz and about 225 Hz.

Images