US20050223114A1 - Method and apparatus for providing mobile and other intermittent connectivity in a computing environment - Google Patents

Abstract

A seamless solution transparently addresses the characteristics of nomadic systems, and enables existing network applications to run reliably in mobile environments. The solution extends the enterprise network, letting network managers provide mobile users with easy access to the same applications as stationary users without sacrificing reliability or centralized management. The solution combines advantages of existing wire-line network standards with emerging mobile standards to create a solution that works with existing network applications. A Mobility Management Server coupled to the mobile network maintains the state of each of any number of Mobile End Systems and handles the complex session management required to maintain persistent connections to the network and to other peer processes. If a Mobile End System becomes unreachable, suspends, or changes network address (e.g., due to roaming from one network interconnect to another), the Mobility Management Server maintains the connection to the associated peer task—allowing the Mobile End System to maintain a continuous connection even though it may temporarily lose contact with its network medium. In one example, Mobility Management Server communicates with Mobile End Systems using Remote Procedure Call and Internet Mobility Protocols.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
• This application is a divisional application of application Ser. No. 10/307,480, filed Dec. 2, 2002, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Providing Mobile and Other Intermittent Connectivity in a Computing Environment,” now allowed; which is a division of application Ser. No. 09/330,310, filed Jun. 11, 1999, entitled “Method And Apparatus For Providing Mobile And Other Intermittent Connectivity In A Computing Environment,” now U.S. Pat. No. 6,546,425, which claims the benefit of provisional application No. 60/103,598 filed Oct. 9, 1998 entitled “Method and Apparatus For Providing Wireless Connectivity In A Computing Environment” the entire content of each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in this application.
STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT
• Not applicable.
FIELD
• The present invention relates to connectivity between networked computing devices. More particularly, the present invention relates to methods and systems that transparently address the characteristics of nomadic systems, and enable existing network applications to run reliably in the associated mobile environments. Still more particularly, the invention relates to techniques and systems for providing a continuous data stream connection between intermittently-connected devices such as handheld data units and personal computing devices.
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY
• Increasingly, companies are seeing rapid access to key information as the way to maintaining a competitive advantage. To provide immediate access to this information, mobile and other intermittently-connected computing devices are quietly and swiftly becoming an essential part of corporate networks—especially with the proliferation of inexpensive laptops and hand-held computing devices. However, integrating these nomadic devices into existing network infrastructures has created a challenge for the information manager.
• Many problems in mobile networking parallel the difficulties in early local area networks (LANs) before the adoption of Ethernet. There are a variety of mobile protocols and interfaces, and because standards are just developing, there is little interoperability between systems. In addition, performance over these network technologies has been typically slow and bandwidth limited. Implementation costs to date have been high due the specialized nature of deployed systems.
• Along with these issues, mobile technologies present a category of problems unto their own. Interconnects back into the main network may travel over and through a public network infrastructure, thus allowing sensitive information to possibly be tapped into. Furthermore, if any of the intermediary interconnects are via a wireless interface, the information is actually broadcast, and anyone with a similar interface can eavesdrop without much difficulty.
• But, perhaps even more significantly, mobile networking has generally in the past been limited to mostly message-oriented or stateless applications—and thus has not been readily adaptable for existing or new corporate applications that use client/server, host-terminal, web-based or shared file systems models. This is because such commonly used applications need stateful sessions that employ a continuous stream of data—not just a stateless packet exchange—to work effectively and reliably.
• To this end, many or most popular off-the-shelf networking applications require TCP/IP sessions, or private virtual circuits. These sessions cannot continue to function if they encounter network interruptions, nor can they tolerate roaming between networks (i.e., a change of network addresses) while established. Yet, mobile networking is, by its nature, dynamic and unreliable. Consider these common scenarios encountered in mobile networks:
• Disconnected or Out of Range User
• When a mobile device disconnects from a given network or loses contact (e.g., through an outage or “hole” in the coverage of a wireless interconnect), the session-oriented application running on the mobile device loses its stateful connection with its peer and ceases to operate. When the device is reattached or moves back into contact, the user must re-connect, log in again for security purposes, find the place in the application where work was left off, and possibly re-enter lost data. This reconnection process is time consuming, costly, and can be very frustrating.
• Moving to a Different-Network or Across a Router Boundary (Network Address Change)
• Mobile networks are generally segmented for manageability purposes. But the intent of mobile devices is to allow them to roam. Roaming from one network interconnect to another can mean a change of network address. If this happens while the system is operational, the routing information must be changed for communications to continue between the associated peers. Furthermore, acquiring a new network address may require all of the previously established stateful application sessions to be terminated—again presenting the reconnection problems noted above.
• Security
• As mentioned before, companies need to protect critical corporate data. Off-the-shelf enterprise applications are often written with the assumption that access to the physical network is controlled (i.e., carried within cables installed inside a secure facility), and security is maintained through an additional layer of authentication and possible encryption. These assumptions have not been true in the nomadic computing world—where data is at risk for interception as it travels over public airways or public wire-line infrastructures.
• Summary
• It would be highly desirable to provide an integrated solution that transparently addresses the characteristics of nomadic systems, and enables existing network applications to run reliably in these mobile environments.
• A presently preferred non-limiting implementation solves this problem by providing a seamless solution that extends the enterprise network, letting network managers provide mobile users with easy access to the same applications as stationary users without sacrificing reliability or centralized management. The solution combines advantages of present-day wire-line network standards with emerging mobile standards to create a solution that works with existing network applications.
• In accordance with one aspect of a presently preferred non-limiting implementation, a Mobility Management Server (MMS) coupled to the mobile interconnect maintains the state of each of any number of Mobile End Systems (MES) and handles the complex session management required to maintain persistent connections to the network and to peer application processes. If a Mobile End System becomes unreachable, suspends, or changes network address (e.g., due to roaming from one network interconnect to another), the Mobility Management Server maintains the connection to the associated peer—allowing the Mobile End System to maintain a continuous virtual connection even though it may temporarily lose its actual physical connection.
• A presently preferred exemplary non-limiting implementation also provides the following (among others) new and advantageous techniques and arrangements:
• • a Mobility Management Server providing user configurable session priorities for mobile clients;
  • per-user mobile policy management for managing consumption of network resources;
  • a roaming methodology making use of the industry standard Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) in coordination with a Mobility Management Server;
  • automatic system removal of unreliable datagrams based on user configurable timeouts; and
  • automatic system removal of unreliable datagrams based on user configurable retries.
• In more detail, a presently preferred exemplary non-limiting implementation in one of its aspects provides a Mobility Management Server that is coupled to the mobile interconnect (network). The Mobility Management Server maintains the state of each of any number of Mobile End Systems and handles the complex session management required to maintain persistent connections to the network and to other processes (e.g., running on other network-based peer systems). If a Mobile End System becomes unreachable, suspends, or changes network address (e.g., due to roaming from one network interconnect to another), the Mobility Management Server maintains the connection to the associated peer, by acknowledging receipt of data and queuing requests. This proxying by the Mobility Management Server allows the application on the Mobile End System to maintain a continuous connection even though it may temporarily lose its physical connection to a specific network medium.
• In accordance with another aspect of a presently preferred exemplary non-limiting implementation, a Mobility Management Server manages addresses for Mobile End Systems. Each Mobile End System is provided with a proxy address on the primary network. This highly available address is known as the “virtual address” of the Mobile End System. The Mobility Management Server maps the virtual addresses to current “point of presence” addresses of the nomadic systems. While the point of presence address of a Mobile End System may change when the mobile system changes from one network interconnect to another, the virtual address stays constant while any connections are active or longer if the address is statically assigned.
• In accordance with yet another aspect of a presently preferred exemplary non-limiting implementation, a Mobility Management Server provides centralized system management of Mobile End Systems through a console application and exhaustive metrics. A presently preferred exemplary non-limiting implementation also provides user configurable session priorities for mobile clients running through a proxy server, and per-user mobile policy management for managing consumption of network resources.
• In accordance with yet another aspect of a presently preferred exemplary non-limiting implementation, a Remote Procedure Call protocol and an Internet Mobility Protocol are used to establish communications between the proxy server and each Mobile End System.
• Remote procedure calls provide a method for allowing a process on a local system to invoke a procedure on a remote system. The use of the RPC protocol allows Mobile End Systems to disconnect, go out of range or suspend operation without losing active network sessions. Since session maintenance does not depend on a customized application, off-the-shelf applications will run without modification in the nomadic environment.
• The Remote Procedure Call protocol generates transactions into messages that can be sent via the standard network transport protocol and infrastructure. These RPC messages contain the entire network transaction initiated by an application running on the Mobile End System—enabling the Mobility Management Server and Mobile End System to keep connection state information synchronized at all times—even during interruptions of the physical link connecting the two. In the preferred implementation of a presently preferred exemplary non-limiting implementation providing RPC's, the proxy server and the Mobile End Systems share sufficient knowledge of each transaction's state to maintain coherent logical database about all shared connections at all times.
• The Internet Mobility Protocol provided in accordance with a presently preferred exemplary non-limiting implementation compensates for differences between wired local area network interconnects and other less reliable networks such as a wireless LAN or WAN. Adjusted frame sizes and protocol timing provide significant performance improvements over non-mobile-aware transports—dramatically reducing network traffic. This is important when bandwidth is limited or when battery life is a concern. The Internet Mobility Protocol provided in accordance with a presently preferred exemplary non-limiting implementation also ensures the security of organizational data as it passes between the Mobile End System and the Mobility Management Server over public network interconnects or airways. The Internet Mobility Protocol provides a basic firewall function by allowing only authenticated devices access to the organizational network. The Internet Mobility Protocol can also certify and encrypt all communications between the Mobility Management Server and the Mobile End System.
• In accordance with yet another aspect of a presently preferred exemplary non-limiting implementation, mobile inter-connectivity is built on standard transport protocols (e.g., TCP/IP, UDP/IP and DHCP, etc) to extend the reach of standard network application interfaces. A presently preferred exemplary non-limiting implementation efficiently integrates transport, security, address management, device management and user management needs to make nomadic computing environments effectively transparent. The Internet Mobility Protocol provides an efficient mechanism for multiplexing multiple streams of data (reliable and unreliable) through a single virtual channel provided by such standard transport protocols over standard network infrastructure.
• With the help of the RPC layer, the Internet Mobility Protocol coalesces data from different sources targeted for the same or different destinations, together into a single stream and forwards it over a mobile link. At the other end of the mobile link, the data is demultiplexed back into multiple distinct streams, which are sent on to their ultimate destination(s). The multiplexing/demultiplexing technique allows for maximum use of available bandwidth (by generating the maximum sized network frames possible), and allows multiple channels to be established (thus allowing prioritization and possibly providing a guaranteed quality of service if the underlying network provides the service).
• The Internet Mobility Protocol provided in accordance with a presently preferred exemplary non-limiting implementation provides the additional features and advantages, for example:
• • Transport protocol independence.
  • Allows the network point of presence (POP) or network infrastructure to change without affecting the flow of data (except where physical boundary, policy or limitations of bandwidth may apply).
  • Minimal additional overhead.
  • Automatic fragment resizing to accommodate the transmission medium. (When the protocol data unit for a given frame is greater then the available maximum transmission unit of the network medium, the Internet Mobility Protocol will fragment and reassemble the frame to insure that it can traverse the network. In the event of a retransmit, the frame will again be assessed. If the network infrastructure or environment changes, the frame will be refragmented or in the case that the maximum transmission unit actually grew, sent as a single frame.)
  • Semantics of unreliable data are preserved, by allowing frames to discard unreliable data during retransmit.
  • Provides a new semantic of Reliable Datagram service. (Delivery of datagrams can now be guaranteed to the peer terminus of the Internet Mobility Protocol connection. Notification of delivery can be provided to a requesting entity.)
  • Considers the send and receive transmission path separately, and automatically tailors its operating parameters to provided optimum throughput. (Based on hysteresis, it adjusts such parameters as frame size/fragmentation threshold, number of frames outstanding (window), retransmit time, and delayed acknowledgement time to reduce the amount of duplicate data sent through the network.)
  • Network fault tolerant (since the expected usage is in a mobile environment, temporary loss of network medium connectivity does not result in a termination of the virtual channel or application based connection).
  • Provides an in-band signaling method to its peer to adjust operating parameters (each end of the connection can alert its peer to any changes in network topology or environment).
  • Employs congestion avoidance algorithms and gracefully decays throughput when necessary.
  • Employs selective acknowledgement and fast retransmit policies to limit the number of gratuitous retransmissions, and provide faster handoff recovery in nomadic environments. (This also allows the protocol to maintain optimum throughput in a lossy network environment.)
  • Employs sliding window technology to allow multiple frames to be outstanding. (This parameter is adjustable in each direction and provides for streaming frames up to a specified limit without requiring an acknowledgement from its peer.)
  • Sequence numbers are not byte oriented, thus allowing for a single sequence number to represent up to a maximum payload size.
  • Security aware. (Allows for authentication layer and encryption layer to be added in at the Internet Mobility Protocol layer.)
  • Compression to allow for better efficiency through bandwidth limited links.
  • Balanced design, allowing either peer to migrate to a new point of presence.
  • Either side may establish a connection to the peer.
  • Allows for inactivity timeouts to be invoked to readily discard dormant connections and recover expended resources.
  • Allows for a maximum lifetime of a given connection (e.g., to allow termination and/or refusal to accept connections after a given period or time of day).
• A presently preferred exemplayr non-limiting implementation also allows a system administrator to manage consumption of network resources. For example, the system administrator can place controls on Mobile End Systems, the Mobility Management Server, or both. Such controls can be for the purpose, for example, of managing allocation of network bandwidth or other resources, or they may be related to security issues. It may be most efficient to perform management tasks at the client side for clients with lots of resources. However, thin clients don't have many resources to spare, so it may not be practical to burden them with additional code and processes for performing policy management. Accordingly, it may be most practical to perform or share such policy management functions for thin clients at a centralized point such as the Mobility Management Server. Since the Mobility Management Server proxies the distinct data streams of the Mobile End Systems, it provides a central point from which to conduct policy management. Moreover, the Mobility Management Server provides the opportunity to perform policy management of Mobile End Systems on a per user and/or per device basis. Since the Mobility Management Server is proxying on a per user basis, it has the ability to control and limit each user's access to network resources on a per-user basis as well as on a per-device basis.
• As one simple example, the Mobility Management Server can “lock out” certain users from accessing certain network resources. This is especially important considering that interface network is via a mobile interconnect, and may thus “extend” outside of the boundaries of a locked organizational facility (consider, for example, an ex-employee who tries to access the network from outside his former employer's building). However, the policy management provided by the Mobility Management Server can be much more sophisticated. For example, it is possible for the Mobility Management Server to control particular Web URL's particular users can visit, filter data returned by network services requests, and/or compress data for network bandwidth conservation. This provides a way to enhance existing and new application-level services in a seamless and transparent manner.
• A presently preferred exemplary non-limiting implementation thus extends the enterprise network, letting network managers provide mobile users with easy access to the same applications as stationary users without sacrificing reliability or centralized management. The solution combines advantages of existing wire-line network standards with emerging mobility standards to create a solution that works with existing network applications.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
• These, as well as other features and advantages will be more completely understood and appreciated by careful study of the following more detailed description of presently preferred non-limiting exemplary implementations in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, of which:
• FIG. 1 is a diagram of an overall mobile computing network provided in accordance with a presently preferred exemplary non-limiting implementation;
• FIG. 2 shows an example software architecture for a Mobile End System and a Mobility Management Server;
• FIG. 2A shows example steps performed to transfer information between a Mobile End System and a Mobility Management Server;
• FIG. 3 shows an example mobile interceptor architecture;
• FIG. 3A is a flowchart of example steps performed by the mobile interceptor;
• FIG. 3B is a flowchart of example steps performed by an RPC engine to handle RPC work requests;
• FIGS. 4-5C are flowcharts of example steps to process RPC work requests;
• FIG. 6 is a diagram of an example received work request;
• FIG. 7 is a diagram showing how a received work request can be dispatched onto different priority queues;
• FIGS. 8 and 9 show processing of the contents of the different priority queues;
• FIGS. 10A-15B show example steps performed to provide an Internet Mobility Protocol;
• FIG. 16 shows example listener data structures; and
• FIGS. 17, 17A and18 are flowcharts of example steps performed to provide for mobile interconnect roaming.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PRESENTLY PREFERRED EXAMPLE IMPLEMENTATIONS
• FIG. 1 is an example of mobile enhancednetworked computer system100 provided in accordance with a presently preferred exemplary non-limiting implementation.Networked computer system100 includes aMobility Management Server102 and one or moreMobile End Systems104.Mobile End Systems104 can communicate withMobility Management Server102 via a local area network (LAN)108.Mobility Management Server102 serves as network level proxy forMobile End Systems104 by maintaining the state of each Mobile End System, and by handling the complex session management required to maintain persistent connections to anypeer systems110 that host network applications—despite the interconnect betweenMobile End Systems104 andMobility Management Server102 being intermittent and unreliable. In the preferred implementation,Mobility Management Server102 communicates withMobile End Systems104 using Remote Procedure Call and Internet Mobility Protocols in accordance with a presently preferred exemplary non-limiting implementation.
• In this particular example,Mobile End Systems104 are sometimes but not always actively connected toMobility Management Server102. For example:
• • SomeMobile End Systems104a-104kmay communicate withMobility Management Server102 via a mobile interconnect (wirelessly in this case), e.g., conventional electromagnetic (e.g., radio frequency) transceivers106 coupled to wireless (or wire-line) local area orwide area network108. Such mobile interconnect may allowMobile End Systems104a-104kto “roam” from onecover area107ato anothercoverage area107k.Typically, there is a temporary loss of communications when aMobile End System104 roams from one coverage area107 to another, moves out of range of the closest transceiver106, or has its signal temporarily obstructed (e.g., when temporarily moved behind a building column or the like).
  • OtherMobile End Systems104l,104m, . . .may communicate withMobility Management Server102 via non-permanent wire-based interconnects109 such as docking ports, network cable connectors, or the like. There may be a temporary loss of communications whenMobile End Systems104 are temporarily disconnected fromLAN108 by breaking connection109, powering off the Mobile End Systems, etc.
  • Still other Mobile End Systems (e.g.,104n) may be nomadically coupled toMobility Management Server102 via afurther network topography111 such as a wide area network, a dial-up network, a satellite network, or the Internet, to name a few examples. In one example,network111 may provide intermittent service. In another example,Mobile End Systems104 may move from one type of connection to another (e.g., from being connected toMobility Management Server102 via wire-based interconnect109 to being connected vianetwork111, or vice versa)—its connection being temporarily broken during the time it is being moved from one connection to another.
• Mobile End Systems104 may be standard mobile devices and off the shelf computers. For example,Mobile End System104 may comprise a laptop computer equipped with a conventional radio transceiver and/or network cards available from a number of manufacturers.Mobile End Systems104 may run standard network applications and a standard operating system, and communicate on the transport layer using a conventionally available suite of transport level protocols (e.g., TCP/IP suite.) In accordance with the present non-limiting exemplary implementation,Mobile End Systems104 also execute client software that enables them to communicate withMobility Management Server102 using Remote Procedure Call and Internet Mobility Protocols that are transported using the same such standard transport level protocols.
• Mobility Management Server102 may comprise software hosted by a conventional Windows NT or other server. In the preferred implementation,Mobility Management Server102 is a standards-compliant, client-server based intelligent server that transparently extends theenterprise network108 to a nomadic environment.Mobility Management Server102 serves as network level proxy for each of any number ofMobile End Systems104 by maintaining the state of each Mobile End System, and by handling the complex session management required to maintain persistent connections to anypeer systems110 that host network applications—despite the mobile interconnect betweenMobile End Systems104 and transceivers106 being intermittent and unreliable.
• For example,server102 allows any conventional (e.g., TCP/IP based) network application to operate without modification over mobile connection.Server102 maintains the sessions ofMobile End Systems104 that disconnect, go out of range or suspend operation, and resumes the sessions when the Mobile End System returns to service. When aMobile End System104 becomes unreachable, shuts down or changes its point of presence address, theMobility Management Server102 maintains the connection to thepeer system110 by acknowledging receipt of data and queuing requests until the Mobile End System once again becomes available and reachable.
• Server102 also extends the management capabilities of wired networks to mobile connections. Each network software layer operates independently of others, so the solution can be customized to the environment where it is deployed.
• As one example,Mobility Management Server102 may be attached to a conventionalorganizational network108 such as a local area network or wide area network.Network108 may be connected to a variety of fixed-end systems110 (e.g., one or most host computers110).Mobility Management Server102 enablesMobile End Systems104 to communicate with Fixed End System(s)110 using continuous session type data streams even thoughMobile End Systems104 sometimes lose contact with their associated network interconnect or move from onenetwork interconnect106,109,111 to another (e.g., in the case of wireless interconnect, by roaming from one wireless transceiver106 coverage area107 to another).
• AMobile End System104 establishes an association with theMobility Management Server102, either at startup or when the Mobile End System requires network services. Once this association is established, theMobile End System104 can start one or more network application sessions, either serially or concurrently. The Mobile End System104-to-Mobility Management Server102 association allows the Mobile End System to maintain application sessions when the Mobile End System, disconnects, goes out of range or suspends operation, and resume sessions when the Mobile End System returns to service. In the preferred implementation, this process is entirely automatic and does not require any intervention on the user's part.
• In accordance with an aspect of a presently preferred exemplary non-limiting implementation,Mobile End Systems104 communicate withMobility Management Server102 using conventional transport protocols such as, for example, UDP/IP. Use of conventional transport protocols allowsMobile End Systems104 to communicate withMobility Management Server102 using theconventional routers112 and other infrastructure already existing on organization'snetwork108. In accordance with a presently preferred exemplary non-limiting implementation, a higher-level Remote Procedure Call protocol generates transactions into messages that are sent over the mobileenhanced network108 via the standard transport protocol(s). In this preferred implementation, these mobile RPC messages contain the entire network transaction initiated by an application running on theMobile End System104, so it can be completed in its entirety by the Mobility Management Server. This enables theMobility Management Server102 andMobile End System104 to keep connection state information synchronized at all times—even during interruptions of network medium connectivity.
• Each ofMobile End Systems104 executes a mobility management software client that supplies the Mobile End System with the intelligence to intercept all network activity and relay it via the mobile RPC protocol toMobility Management Server102. In the preferred implementation, the mobility management client works transparently with operating system features present on Mobile End Systems104 (e.g., Windows NT, Windows 98, Windows 95, Windows CE, etc.) to keep client-site application sessions active when contact is lost with the network.
• Mobility Management Server102 maintains the state of eachMobile End System104 and handles the complex session management required to maintain persistent connections to associatedpeer108 such ashost computer110 attached to the other end of the connection end point. If aMobile End System104 becomes unreachable, suspends, or changes network address (e.g., due to roaming from one network interconnect to another), theMobility Management Server102 maintains the connection to thehost system110 or other connection end-point, by acknowledging receipt of data and queuing requests. This proxy function means that the peer application never detects that the physical connection to theMobile End System104 has been lost—allowing the Mobile End System's application(s) to effectively maintain a continuous connection with its associated session end point (by simply and easily resuming operations once a physical connection again is established) despite the mobile system temporarily losing connection or roaming from one network interconnect106A to another network interconnect106K within coverage area107K.
• Mobility Management Server102 also provides address management to solve the problem ofMobile End Systems104 receiving different network addresses when they roam to different parts of the segmented network. EachMobile End System104 is provided with a virtual address on the primary network. Standard protocols or static assignment determine these virtual addresses. For each activeMobile End System104,Mobility Management Server102 maps the virtual address to the Mobile End System's current actual (“point of presence”) address. While the point of presence address of aMobile End System104 may change when the device changes from one network segment to another, the virtual address stays constant while any connections are active or longer if the address is assigned statically.
• Thus, the change of a point of presence address of aMobile End System104 remains entirely transparent to an associated session end point on host system110 (or other peer) communicating with the Mobile End System via theMobility Management Server102. Thepeer110 sees only the (unchanging) virtual address proxied by theserver102.
• In the preferred implementation,Mobility Management Server102 can also provide centralized system management through console applications and exhaustive metrics. A system administrator can use these tools to configure and manage remote connections, and troubleshoot remote connection and system problems.
• The proxy server function provided byMobility Management Server102 allows for different priority levels for network applications, users and machines. This is useful because eachMobility Management Server102 is composed of finite processing resources. Allowing the system manager to configure theMobility Management Server102 in this way provides enhanced overall system and network performance. As one example, the system manager can configureMobility Management Server102 to allow real time applications such as streaming audio or video to have greater access to theMobility Management Server102's resources than other less demanding applications such as email.
• In more detail,Mobility Management Server102 can be configured via an application or application interface; standard network management protocols such as SNMP; a Web-based configuration interface; or a local user interface. It is possible to configure association priority and/or to configure application priority within an association. For example, the priority of each association relative to other associations running through theMobility Management Server102 is configurable by either the user name, or machine name (in the preferred implementation, when the priority is configured for both the user and the machine that a user is logged in on, the configuration for the user may have higher precedence). In addition or alternatively, each association may have several levels of application priority, which is configured based on network application name. The system allows for any number of priority levels to exist. In one particular implementation, three priority levels are provided: low, medium and high.
• Server and Client Example Software Architecture
• FIG. 2 shows an example software architecture forMobile End System104 andMobility Management Server102. In accordance with one aspect of a presently preferred exemplary non-limiting implementation,Mobile End System104 andMobility Management Server102 run standard operating system and application software—with only a few new components being added to enable reliable and efficient persistent session connections over an intermittently connectedmobile network108. As shown inFIG. 2,Mobile End System104 runs conventional operating system software includingnetwork interface drivers200, TCP/UDP transport support202, a transport driver interface (TDI)204, and asocket API206 used to interface with one or moreconventional network applications208. Conventional network file andprint services210 may also be provided to communicate withconventional TDI204.Server102 may include similar conventionalnetwork interface drivers200′, TCP/UDP transport support202′, a transport driver interface (TDI)204′, and asocket API206′ used to interface with one or moreconventional network applications208′.Mobile End System104 andMobility Management Server102 may each further include conventional security software such as a network/security provider236 (Mobile End System) and a user/security database238 (server).
• In accordance with one exemplary aspect of the present non-limiting exemplary implementation, a new,mobile interceptor component212 is inserted between the TCP/UDP transport module202 and the transport driver interface (TDI)204 of theMobile End System104 software architecture.Mobile interceptor212 intercepts certain calls at theTDI204 interface and routes them via RPC and Internet Mobility Protocols and the standard TCP/UDP transport protocols202 toMobility Management Server102 overnetwork108.Mobile interceptor212 thus can intercept all network activity and relay it toserver102.Interceptor212 works transparently with operating system features to allow client-side application sessions to remain active when theMobile End System104 loses contact withnetwork108.
• Whilemobile interceptor212 could operate at a different level than the transport driver interface204 (e.g., at the socket API level206), there are advantages in havingmobile interceptor212 operate at the TDI level. Many conventional operating systems (e.g., Microsoft Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows NT and Windows CE) provideTDI interface204—thus providing compatibility without any need to change operating system components. Furthermore, because thetransport driver interface204 is a kernel level interface, there is no need to switch to user mode—thus realizing performance improvements. Furthermore,mobile interceptor212 working at the level ofTDI interface204 is able to intercept from a variety of different network applications208 (e.g., multiple simultaneously running applications) as well as encompassing network file and print services210 (which would have to be handled differently if the interceptor operated at thesocket API level206 for example).
• FIG. 2A shows an example high level flowchart of howmobile interceptor212 works. A call to theTDI interface204 of Mobile End System104 (block250) is intercepted by mobile interceptor212 (block252).Mobile interceptor212 packages the intercepted RPC call in a fragment in accordance with an Internet Mobility Protocol, and sends the fragment as a datagram via a conventional transport protocol such as UDP or TCP over the LAN, WAN orother transport108 to Mobility Management Server102 (block252). TheMobility Management Server102 receives and unpackages the RPC datagram (block254), and provides the requested service (for example, acting as a proxy to the MobileEnd System application208 by passing data or a response to an application server process running on Fixed End System110).
• Referring once again toFIG. 2,Mobility Management Server102 includes anaddress translator220 that intercepts messages to/fromMobile End Systems104 via a conventional network interface driver222. For example,address translator230 recognizes messages from an associated session peer (Fixed End System110) destined for theMobile End System104 virtual address. These incoming Mobile End System messages are provided toproxy server224, which then maps the virtual address and message to previously queued transactions and then forwards the responses back to the current point of presence addresses being used by the associatedMobile End System104.
• As also shown inFIG. 2,Mobility Management Server102 includes, in addition to address translation (intermediate driver)220, andproxy server224, aconfiguration manager228, a control/user interface230 and amonitor232.Configuration management228 is used to provide configuration information and parameters to allowproxy server224 to manage connections. Control,user interface230 and monitor232 allow a user to interact with proxy server214.
• Mobile Interceptor
• FIG. 3 shows an example software architecture formobile interceptor212 that support the RPC Protocol and the Internet Mobility Protocol in accordance with a presently preferred exemplary non-limiting implementation. In this example,mobile interceptor212 has two functional components:
• • a Remote ProcedureCall protocol engine240; and
  • an InternetMobility Protocol engine244.
• Mobile interceptor212 in the preferred implementation thus supports Remote Procedure Call protocol and Internet Mobility Protocol to connectMobility Management Server102 to eachMobile End System104. Remote procedure calls provide a method for allowing a process on a local system to invoke a procedure on a remote system. Typically, the local system is not aware that the procedure call is being executed on a remote system. The use of RPC protocols allowsMobile End System104 to go out of range or suspend operation without losing active network sessions. Since session maintenance does not depend on a customized application, off-the-shelf applications will run without modification in the mobile environment ofnetwork108.
• Network applications typically use application-level interfaces such as Windows sockets. A single call to an application-level API may generate several outgoing or incoming data packets at the transport, or media access layer. In prior mobile networks, if one of these packets is lost, the state of the entire connection may become ambiguous and the session must be dropped. In the preferred exemplary non-limiting implementation providing RPCs, theMobility Management Server102 and theMobile End Systems104 share sufficient knowledge of the connection state to maintain a coherent logical link at all times—even during physical interruption.
• The Internet Mobility Protocol provided in accordance with a presently preferred exemplary non-limiting implementation compensates for differences between wire-line and other less reliable networks such as wireless. Adjusted frame sizes and protocol timing provide significant performance improvements over non-mobile-aware transports—dramatically reducing network traffic. This is important when bandwidth is limited or when battery life is a concern.
• The Internet Mobility Protocol provided in accordance with a presently preferred non-limiting implementation also ensure the security of organization's data as it passes between theMobile End System104 and theMobility Management Server102 on the public wire-line networks or airway. The Internet Mobility Protocol provides a basic firewall function by allowing only authenticated devices access to the organizational network. The Internet Mobility Protocol can also certify and encrypt all communications between themobility management system102 and theMobile End System104.
• The Remote ProcedureCall protocol engine240 onMobile End System104 ofFIG. 3 marshals TDI call parameters, formats the data, and sends the request to the InternetMobility Protocol engine244 for forwarding toMobility Management Server102 where the TDI RemoteProcedure Call engine240′ executes the calls.Mobile End Systems104 martial TDI call parameters according to the Remote Procedure Call protocol. When theMobility Management Server102 TDI Remote ProcedureCall protocol engine240′ receives these RPCs, it executes the calls on behalf of theMobile End System104. TheMobility Management Server102 TDI Remote ProcedureCall protocol engine240′ shares the complete network state for each connected Mobile End System with the peerMobile End System104'sRPC engine240. In addition to performing remote procedure calls on behalf of theMobile End Systems104, theserver RPC engine240′ is also responsible for system flow control, remote procedure call parsing, virtual address multiplexing (in coordination with services provided by address translator220), remote procedure call transaction prioritization, scheduling, and coalescing.
• The InternetMobility Protocol engine244 performs reliable datagram services, sequencing, fragmentation, and re-assembly of messages. It can, when configured, also provide authentication, certification, data encryption and compression for enhanced privacy, security and throughput. Because the InternetMobility Protocol engine244 functions in power-sensitive environments using several different transports, it is power management aware and is transport independent.
• FIG. 3A shows an example processmobile interceptor212 performs to communicate a TDI call toMobility Management Server102. Generally, the mobile interceptorRPC protocol engine240 forwards marshaled TDI calls to the InternetMobility Protocol engine244 to be transmitted to theMobility Management Server102.RPC protocol engine240 does this by posting the RPC call to a queue maintained by the Internet Mobility Protocol engine244 (block302). To facilitate bandwidth management, the InternetMobility Protocol engine244 delays sending received RPC calls for some period of time (“the RPC coalesce time out period”) (block304). Typically, the RPC coalesce timeout is set between five and fifteen milliseconds as one example but is user configurable. This delay allows theRPC engine240 to continue posting TDI calls to the InternetMobility Protocol engine244 queue so that more than one RPC call can be transmitted to theMobility Management Server102 in the same datagram (fragment).
• When the coalesce timer expires, or theRPC protocol engine240 determines that it will not be receiving more RPC calls (decision block306), the RPC engine provides the InternetMobility Protocol engine244 with a request to flush the queue, coalesce the RPC calls into a single frame, and forward the frame to its peer (block308). This coalescing reduces the number of transmissions—enhancing protocol performance.
• As mentioned above,Mobility Management Server102 proxy server also has anRPC protocol engine212′ and an InternetMobility Protocol engine244′.FIG. 3B shows an example process performed byMobility Management Server102 upon receipt of an Internet Mobility Protocol message frame fromMobile End System104. Once the frame is received by theMobility Management Server102, the InternetMobility Protocol engine244′ reconstructs the frame if fragmented (due to the maximum transmission size of the underlying transport) and then demultiplexes the contents of the message to determine whichMobile End System104 it was received from. This demultiplexing allows theInternet Mobility Protocol244′ to provide the RemoteProcedure Call engine240′ with the correct association-specific context information.
• The InternetMobility Protocol engine244′ then formulates the received message into a RPC receive indicationsystem work request354, and provides theMobility Management Server102RPC engine240′ with the formulated work request and association-specific context information. WhenRPC protocol engine240′ receiveswork request352, it places it into an association-specific work queue356, and schedules the association to run by providing a scheduled request to aglobal queue358. The main work thread ofRPC engine240′ is then signaled that work is available. Once the main thread is awake, it polls theglobal queue358 to find the previously queued association scheduled event. It then de-queues the event and begins to process the association-specific work queue356.
• On the associationspecific work queue356 it finds the previously queued RPC receive indication work request The main thread then de-queues the RPC receiveindication work request356 and parses the request. Because of the coalescing described in connection withFIG. 3A, theMobility Management Server102 often receives several RPC transactions bundled in each datagram. It then demultiplexes each RPC transaction back into distinct remote procedure calls and executes the requested function on behalf ofMobile End System104. For performancepurposes RPC engine240′ may provide a look ahead mechanism during the parsing process of the RPC messages to see if it can execute some of the requested transactions concurrently (pipelining).
• HowRPC Protocol Engine240′ Runs RPC Associations
• FIG. 4 is a flowchart of an example process for running RPC associations placed on anassociation work queue356. When an RPC association is scheduled to run, the main thread for theRPC protocol engine240′ (which may be implemented as a state machine) de-queues the work request fromglobal work queue358 and determines the type of work request.
• There are six basic types of RPC work requests in the preferred implementation:
• • schedule request;
  • connect indication;
  • disconnect indication;
  • local terminate association;
  • “resources available” request; and
  • ping inactivity timeout.
    RPC protocol engine240′ handles these various types of requests differently depending upon their type.RPC protocol engine240′ tests the request type (indicated by information associated with the request as stored on global queue358) in order to determine how to process the request.
• If the type of work request is a “schedule request” (decision block360), theRPC engine240′ determines which association is being scheduled (block362).RPC engine240′ can determine this information from what is stored onglobal queue358. Once the association is known,RPC engine240′ can identify the particular one of association work queues356(1) . . .356(n) the corresponding request is stored on.RPC engine362 retrieves the corresponding association control block (block362), and calls a ProcessAssociation Work task364 to begin processing the work in a specific association'swork queue356 as previously noted.
• FIG. 5 shows example steps performed by the “process association work”task364 ofFIG. 4. Once the specific association has been determined, this “process association work”task364 is called to process the work that resides in the correspondingassociation work queue356. If the de-queued work request (block390) is an RPC receive request (decision block392), it is sent to the R-PC parser to be processed (block394). Otherwise, if the de-queued work request is a pending receive request (decision block396), theRPC engine240′requests TDI204′ to start receiving data on behalf of the application's connection (block398). If the de-queued work request is a pending connect request (decision block400),RPC engine240′requests TDI204′ to issue an application specified TCP (or other transport protocol) connect request (block402). It then waits for a response from theTDI layer204′. Once the request is completed byTDI204′, its status is determined and then reported back to the original requesting entity. As a performance measure,RPC engine240′ may decide to retry the connect request process some number of times by placing the request back on the associations-specific work queue (356) before actually reporting an error back to the requesting peer. This again is done in an effort to reduce network bandwidth and processing consumption.
• The above process continues to loop until a “scheduling weight complete” test (block404) is satisfied. In this example, a scheduling weight is used to decide how many work requests will be de-queued and processed for this particular association. This scheduling weight is a configuration parameter set byconfiguration manager228, and is acquired when the association connect indication occurs (FIG. 4, block372). This value is configurable based on user or the physical identification of the machine.
• Once the RPC engine is finished with the association work queue356 (for the time at least), it may proceed to process dispatch queues (block406) (to be discussed in more detail below). If, after processing work on the association'swork queue356, more work remains in the association work queue, theRPC engine240′ will reschedule the association to run again at a later time by posting a new schedule request to the global work queue358 (FIG. 4,decision block366, block368;FIG. 5,decision block408, block410).
• Referring once again toFIG. 4, if the RPC work request is a “connect indication” (decision block370),RPC engine240′ is being requested to instantiate a new association with a mobile peer (usually, but not always, the Mobile End System104). As one example, the connect indication may provide theRPC engine240′ with the following information about the peer machine which is initiating the connection:
• • physical identifier of the machine,
  • name of the user logged into the machine,
  • address of the peer machine, and
  • optional connection data from thepeer RPC engine240.
• In response to the connect indication (decision block370), theRPC engine240 calls theconfiguration manager228 with these parameters.Configuration manager228 uses these parameters to determine the exact configuration for the new connection. The configuration (e.g., association scheduling weight and the list of all applications that require non-default scheduling priorities along with those priorities) is then returned to theRPC engine240′ for storage and execution.RPC engine240′ then starts the new association, and creates a new association control block (block372). As shown inFIG. 5A the following actions may be taken:
• • allocate and association control block (block372A);
  • initialize system wide resources with defaults (block372B);
  • get configuration overrides with current configuration settings (block372C);
  • initialize flags (block372D);
  • initialize the association-specific work queue (block372E);
  • initialize association object hash table (block372F);
  • initialize the coalesce timer (block372G); and
  • insert association control block into session table (block372H).
• A “disconnect indication” is issued by the InternetMobility Protocol engine244′ to theRPC engine240′ when the Internet Mobility Protocol engine has determined that the association must be terminated. TheRPC engine240′ tests for this disconnect indication (block374), and in response, stops the association and destroys the association control block (block376). As shown inFIG. 5B, the following steps may be performed:
• • mark the association as deleted to prevent any further processing of work that may be outstanding (block376A);
  • close all associated association objects including process, connection and address objects (block376B);
  • free all elements on work queue (block376C);
  • stop coalesce timer if running (block376D);
  • decrement association control block reference count (block376E); and
  • if the reference count is zero (tested for byblock376F):
  • Z,1 destroy association specific work queue,
  • Z,1 destroy object hash table,
  • Z,1 destroy coalesce timer,
  • z,1 remove association control block from association table, and
  • Z,1 free control block (376G).
• A “terminate session” request is issued whensystem100 has determined that the association must be terminated. This request is issued by the system administrator, the operating system or an application.RPC engine240′ handles a terminate session request in the same way it handles a disconnect request (decision block378, block376).
• In the preferred implementation, the interface between theRPC engine240′ and the InternetMobility Protocol engine244′ specifies a flow control mechanism based on credits. Each time one thread posts a work request to another thread, the call thread returns the number of credits left in the work queue. When a queue becomes full, the credit count goes to zero. By convention, the calling thread is to stop posting further work once the credit count goes to zero. Therefore, it is necessary to have a mechanism to tell the calling thread that “resources are available” once the queued work is processed and more room is available by some user configurable/pre-determined low-water mark in the queue. This is the purpose of the “resources available” work indication (tested for by decision block380). As shown inFIG. 5C, the following steps may be performed when the credit count goes to zero:
• • mark association as “low mark pending” by setting the RPC_LMPQ_SEND_FLAG (block379A). Once in this state:
  • all received datagrams are discarded (block379B);
• * all received stream events are throttled by refusing to accept the data (block379C) (this causes the TCP or other transport receive window to eventually close, and provides flow control between theFixed End System110 and theMobility Management Server102; before returning, the preferred implementation jams a “pending receive request” to the front of the associationspecific work queue356 so that outstanding stream receive event processing will continue immediately once resources are made available).
• • all received connect events are refused for passive connections (block379D).
• When the “resources available” indication is received by theRPC engine240′ (FIG. 4, decision block380), the RPC engine determine whether the association has work pending in its associatedassociation work queue356; if it does, the RPC engine marks the queue as eligible to run by posting the association to the global work queue358 (block382). If a pending receive request has been posted during the time the association was in the low mark pending state, it is processed at this time (in the preferred implementation, theRPC engine240 ′ continues to accept any received connect requests during this processing).
• Referring once again toFIG. 4, ifRPC engine240′ determines that theMobility Management Server102 channel used for “ping” has been inactive for a specified period of time (decision block384), the channel is closed and the resources are freed back to the system to be used by other processes (block386).
• RPC Parsing and Priority Queuing
• Referring back toFIG. 5, it was noted above that RPC engine parsed an RPC receive request upon receipt (seeblocks392, block394). Parsing is necessary in the preferred implementation because a single received datagram can contain multiple RPC calls, and because RPC calls can span multiple Internet Mobility Protocol datagram fragments. An example format for an RPC receivework request500 is shown inFIG. 6. Each RPC receive work request has at least a main fragment502(1), and may have any number of additional fragments502(2) . . .502(N). Main fragment502(1) contains the workrequest structure header503 and a receiveoverlay504. The receiveoverlay504 is a structure overlay placed on top of the fragment502(1) by the InternetMobility Protocol engine244. Within thisoverlay504 is a structure member called pUserData that points to the first RPC call506(1) within thework request500.
• TheFIG. 6 example illustrates awork request500 that contains several RPC calls506(1),506(2) . . .506(8). As shown in theFIG. 6 example, anRPC work request500 need not be contained in a contiguous block of memory or in asingle fragment502. In the example shown, a second fragment502(2) and a third fragment502(3) that are chained together to the main fragment502(1) in a linked list.
• Thus,RPC parser394 in this example handles the following boundary conditions:
• • each RPC receiverequest500 may contain one or more RPC calls;
  • one or more RPC calls506 may exist in asingle fragment502;
  • each RPC call506 may exist completely contained in afragment502; and
  • each RPC call506 may span more than onefragment502.
• FIG. 7 shows an exampleRPC parser process394 to parse an RPC receivework request500. In this example, theRPC parser394 gets the first fragment502(1) in the work request, gets the first RPC call506(1) in the fragment, and parses that RPC call.Parser394 proceeds through the RPC receivework request500 and processes each RPC call506 in turn. If the number of fragment bytes remaining in the RPC receivework request500 fragment502(1) is greater than the size of theRPC header503,parser394 determines whether the RPC call is fully contained within theRPC fragment502 and thus may be processed (this may be determined by testing whether the RPC call length is greater than the number of fragment bytes remaining). If the RPC call type is a chain exception, then the RPC call will handle the updating of theRPC parser394 state. In theproxy server224, the only RPC calls using the chain exception are the “datagram send” and “stream send” calls. This chain exception procedure is done to allow the RPC engine to avoid fragment copies by chaining memory descriptor lists together for the purpose of RPC send calls.
• Once theparser394 identifies an RPC call type, a pointer to the beginning of the RPC information is passed to theRPC engine240 for execution. The RPC engine divides all TDI procedure calls into different priorities for execution. The highest priority calls are immediately executed by passing them to anRPC dispatcher395 for immediate execution. All lower priority calls are dispatched to dispatchqueues510 for future processing. Eachdispatch queue510 represents a discrete priority.
• In the preferred implementation, mobile applications call the “open address” object and “open connection” object functions before executing other TDI networking functions. Therefore, the system assigns application level priorities during the “open address” object and “open connection” object calls. In the example implementation, once an address or connection object is assigned a priority, all calls that are associated with that object are executed within that assigned priority.
• If, for example, the RPC call is a TDI Open Address Object request or a TDI Open Connection Object Request, it is sent to theRPC dispatcher395 for immediate execution. The Open Address and Open Connection object RPC calls provide access to a process ID or process name that are used to match against the information provided by theconfiguration manager228 during the configuration requests that occurs within the association connect indication described earlier. This is used to acquire configuration for the address or connection object.
• In the preferred implementation, all RPC calls have at least an address object or connection object as a parameter. When the call is made, the priority assigned to that specific object is used as the priority for the RPC call. The configuration assigned to the address or connection object determines which priority all associated RPC calls will be executed in. For example, if the assigned priority is “high,” all RPC calls will be executed immediately without being dispatched to adispatch queue510. If the assigned priority is “1,” all RPC calls will be placed into dispatch queue510(1).
• Referring once again toFIG. 5, once the “process association work”task364 process has completed executing its scheduled amount of association work (decision block404), it checks to see if the dispatch queues require servicing (block406).FIG. 8 is a flowchart of example steps performed by the “process dispatch queues”block406 ofFIG. 5 to process thedispatch queues510 shown inFIG. 7.
• In this example,dispatch queues510 are processed beginning with the highest priority queue (510(1) in this example) (block408). Eachqueue510 is assigned a weight factor. The weight factor is a configuration parameter that is returned by theconfiguration manager228 when aMobile End System104 toMobility Management Server102 association is created. As one example, lowpriority dispatch queues510 can have a weight factor of 4, and medium priority queues can have a weight factor of 8. High priority RPC calls do not, in this example, use weight factors because they are executed immediately as they are parsed.
• RPC engine240′ loops through the de-queuing of RPC calls from the current queue until either the queue is empty or the queue weight number of RPC calls has been processed (blocks412-416). For each de-queued RPC call, theRPC dispatcher395 is called to execute the call. TheRPC dispatcher395 executes the procedural call on behalf of theMobile End System104, and formulates the Mobile End System response for those RPC calls that require responses.
• If, after exiting the loop, the queue still has work remaining (decision block418), the queue will be marked as eligible to run again (block420). By exiting the loop, the system yields the processor to the next lower priority queue (blocks424,410). This ensures that all priority levels are given an opportunity to run no matter how much work exists in any particular queue. The system gets the next queue to service, and iterates the process until all queues have been processed. At the end of processing all queues, the system tests to see if any queues have been marked as eligible to run—and if so, the association is scheduled to run again by posting a schedule request to the global work queue. The association is scheduled to run again in the “process global work” routine shown inFIG. 4 above. This approach yields the processor to allow other associations that have work to process an opportunity run. By assigning each queue a weight factor, the system may be tuned to allow different priority levels unequal access to theMobility Management Server102's CPU. Thus, higher priority queues are not only executed first, but may also be tuned to allow greater access to the CPU.
• Mobility Management Server RPC Responses
• The discussion above relates explains how remote procedure calls are sent from theMobile End System104 to theMobility Management Server102 for execution. In addition to this type of RPC call, theMobility Management Server102RPC engine240′ also supports RPC events and RPC receive responses. These are RPC messages that are generated asynchronously as a result of association specific connection peer activity (usually the Fixed End System110).Mobility Management Server102RPC engine240′ completes RPC transactions that are executed by theRPC dispatcher395. Not all RPC calls require a response on successful completion. Those RPC calls that do require responses on successful completion cause theRPC dispatcher395 to build the appropriate response and post the response to the InternetMobile Protocol engine244′ to be returned to the peerMobile End System104. All RPC calls generate a response when the RPC call fails (the RPC receive response is the exception to above).
• RPC events originate as a result ofnetwork108 activity by the association specific connection (usually the Fixed End System110). These RPC event messages are, in the preferred implementation, proxied by theMobility Management Server102 and forwarded to theMobile End System104. The preferred implementationMobility Management Server102 supports the following RPC event calls:
• • Disconnect Event (this occurs when association-specific connected peer (usually the Fixed End System110) issues a transport level disconnect request; the disconnect is received by theproxy server224 on behalf of theMobile End System104, and the proxy server then transmits a disconnect event to the Mobile End System);
  • Stream Receive Event (this event occurs when the association-specific connected peer (usually the Fixed End System110) has sent stream data to theMobile End System104; theproxy server224 receives this data on behalf of theMobile End System104, and sends the data to the Mobile End System in the form of a Receive Response);
  • Receive Datagram Event (this event occurs when any association-specific portal receives datagrams from a network peer (usually the Fixed End System110) destined for theMobile End System104 through theMobility Management Server102; theproxy server224 accepts these datagrams on behalf of the Mobile End System, and forwards them to the Mobile End System in the form of receive datagram events; and
  • Connect Event (this event occurs when the association-specific listening portal receives a transport layer connect request (usually from the Fixed End System110) when it wishes to establish a transport layer end-to-end connection with aMobile End System104; theproxy server224 accepts the connect request on behalf of the Mobile End System, and then builds a connect event RPC call and forwards it to the Mobile End System).
• FIG. 9 shows how theRPC engine240′ handles proxy server-generated RPC calls. For high priority address and connection objects, theRPC engine240′ dispatches a send request to the InternetMobility Protocol engine244′ immediately. The send request results in forwarding the RPC message to the peerMobile End System104. For lower priority objects, the InternetMobility Protocol engine244 send request is posted to anappropriate priority queue510′. If the association is not scheduled to run, a schedule request is also posted to theglobal queue358′. The Internet Mobility Protocol send request is finally executed when the dispatch queues are processed as described earlier in connection withFIGS. 5 & 8.
• Internet Mobility Protocol
• Internet Mobility Protocol provided in accordance with an example non-limiting implementation is a message oriented connection based protocol. It provides guaranteed delivery, (re)order detection, and loss recovery. Further, unlike other conventional connection oriented protocols (i.e. TCP), it allows for multiple distinct streams of data to be combined over a single channel; and allows for guaranteed, unreliable, as well as new message oriented reliable data to traverse the network through the single virtual channel simultaneously. This new message oriented level of service can alert the requester when the Internet Mobility Protocol peer has acknowledged a given program data unit.
• The Internet Mobility Protocol provided in accordance with a presently preferred exemplary non-limiting implementation is designed to be an overlay on existing network topologies and technologies. Due to its indifference to the underlying network architecture, it is transport agnostic. As long as there is a way for packetized data to traverse between two peers, Internet Mobility Protocol can be deployed. Each node's network point of presence (POP) or network infrastructure can also be changed without affecting the flow of data except where physical boundary, policy or limitations of bandwidth apply.
• With the help of the layer above, Internet Mobility Protocol coalesces data from many sources and shuttles the data between the peers using underlying datagram facilities. As each discrete unit of data is presented from the upper layer, Internet Mobility Protocol combines into a single stream and subsequently submits it for transmission. The data units are then forwarded to the peer over the existing network where upon reception, with the help from the layer above, the stream is demultiplexed back into multiple distinct data units. This allows for optimum use of available bandwidth, by generating the maximum sized network frames possible for each new transmission. This also has the added benefit of training the channel once for maximum bandwidth utilization and have its parameters applied to all session level connections.
• In rare instances where one channel is insufficient, the Internet Mobility Protocol further allows multiple channels to be established between the peers—thus allowing for data prioritization and possibly providing a guaranteed quality of service (if the underlying network provides the service).
• The Internet Mobility Protocol also provides a dynamically selectable guaranteed or unreliable levels of service. For example, each protocol data unit that is submitted for transmission can be queued with either a validity time period or a number of retransmit attempts or both. Internet Mobility Protocol will expire a data unit when either threshold is reached, and remove it from subsequent transmission attempts.
• Internet Mobility Protocol's additional protocol overhead is kept minimal by use of a variable length header. The frame type and any optional fields determine the size of the header. These optional fields are added in a specific order to enable easy parsing by the receiving side and bits in the header flag field denote their presence. All other control and configuration information necessary for the peers to communicate can be passed through the in-band control channel. Any control information that needs to be sent is added to the frame prior to any application level protocol data unit. The receiving side processes the control information and then passes the rest of the payload to the upper layer.
• Designed to run over relatively unreliable network links where the error probability is relatively high, Internet Mobility Protocol utilizes a number of techniques to insure data integrity and obtain optimum network performance. To insure data integrity, a Fletcher checksum algorithm is used to detect errant frames. This algorithm was selected due to the fact of its efficiency as well as its detection capability. It can determine not only bit errors, but also bit reordering.
• Sequence numbers are used to insure ordered delivery of data. Internet Mobility Protocol sequence numbers do not, however, represent each byte of data as in TCP. They represent a frame of data that can be, in one example implementation, as large as 65535 bytes (including the Internet Mobility Protocol header). They are 32 bits or other convenient length in one example to insure that wrap-around does not occur over high bandwidth links in a limited amount of time.
• Combining this capability along with the expiration of data, retransmitted (retried) frames may contain less information than the previous version that was generated by the transmitting side. A frame id is provided to enable detection of the latest versioned frame. However, since data is never added in the preferred implementation and each element removed is an entire protocol data unit, this is not a necessity. In one example, the Internet Mobility Protocol will only process the first instance of a specific frame it receives—no matter how many other versions of that frame are transmitted. Each frame created that carries new user payload is assigned its own unique sequence number.
• Performance is gained by using of a sliding window technique—thus allowing for more then one frame to be outstanding (transmitted) at a time before requiring the peer to acknowledge reception of the data. To insure timely delivery of the data, a positive acknowledgement and timer based retransmit scheme is used. To further optimize the use of the channel, a selective acknowledgement mechanism is employed that allows for fast retransmission of missing frames and quick recovery during lossy or congested periods of network connectivity. In one example, this selective acknowledgement mechanism is represented by an optional bit field that is included in the header.
• A congestion avoidance algorithm is also included to allow the protocol to back off from rapid retransmission of frames. For example, a round trip time can be calculated for each frame that has successfully transfer between the peers without a retransmit. This time value is averaged and then used as the basis for the retransmission timeout value. As each frame is sent, a timeout is established for that frame. If an acknowledgement for that frame is not received, and the frame has actually been transmitted, the frame is resent. The timeout value is then increased and then used as the basis for the next retransmission time. This retransmit time-out is bounded on both the upper and lower side to insure that the value is within a reasonable range.
• Internet Mobility Protocol also considers the send and receive paths separately. This is especially useful on channels that are asymmetric in nature. Base on hysteresis, the Internet Mobility Protocol automatically adjusts parameters such as frame size (fragmentation threshold), number of frames outstanding, retransmit time, and delayed acknowledgement time to reduce the amount of duplicate data sent through the network.
• Due to the fact that Internet Mobility Protocol allows a node to migrate to different points of attachment on diverse networks, characteristics (e.g., frame size) of the underlying network may change midstream. An artifact of this migration is that frames that have been queued for transmission on one network may no longer fit over the new medium the mobile device is currently attached to. Combining this issue with the fact that fragmentation may not be supported by all network infrastructures, fragmentation is dealt with at the Internet Mobility Protocol level. Before each frame is submitted for transmission, Internet Mobility Protocol assesses whether or not it exceeds the current fragmentation threshold. Note that this value may be less than the current maximum transmission unit for performance reason (smaller frames have a greater likelihood of reaching its ultimate destination then larger frames). The tradeoff between greater protocol overhead versus more retransmissions is weighed by Internet Mobility Protocol, and the frame size may be reduced in an attempt to reduce overall retransmissions). If a given frame will fit, it is sent in its entirety. If not, the frame is split into maximum allowable size for the given connection. If the frame is retransmitted, it is reassessed, and will be refragmented if the maximum transmission unit has been reduced (or alternatively, if the maximum transmission unit actually grew, the frame may be resent as a single frame without fragmentation).
• The protocol itself is orthogonal in its design as either side may establish or terminate a connection to its peer. In a particular implementation, however, there may be a few minor operational differences in the protocol engine depending on where it is running. For example, based on where the protocol engine is running, certain inactivity detection and connection lifetime timeouts may be only invoked on one side. To allow administrative control, Internet Mobility Protocol engine running on theMobility Management Server102 keeps track of inactivity periods. If the specified period of time expires without any activity from theMobile End System104, theMobility Management Server102 may terminate a session. Also, an administrator may want to limit the overall time a particular connection may be established for, or when to deny access base on time of day. Again these policy timers may, in one example implementation, be invoked only on theMobility Management Server102 side.
• In one example implementation, the software providing the Internet Mobility Protocol is compiled and executable under Windows NT, 9x, and CE environments with no platform specific modification. To accomplish this, Internet Mobility Protocol employs the services of a network abstraction layer (NAL) to send and receive Internet Mobility Protocol frames. Other standard utility functions such as memory management, queue and list management, event logging, alert system, power management, security, etc are also used. A few runtime parameters are modified depending on whether the engine is part of anMobile End System104 orMobility Management Server102 system. Some examples of this are:
• • Certain timeouts are only invoked on theMobility Management Server102
  • Direction of frames are indicated within each frame header for echo detection
  • Inbound connections may be denied ifMobile End System104 is so configured
  • Alerts only signaled onMobility Management Server102
  • Power management enabled onMobile End System104 but is not necessary on theMobility Management Server102
• The Internet Mobility Protocol interface may have only a small number of “C” callable platform independent published API functions, and requires one O/S specific function to schedule its work (other then the aforementioned standard utility functions). Communications with local clients is achieved through the use of defined work objects (work requests). Efficient notification of the completion of each work element is accomplished by signaling the requesting entity through the optional completion callback routine specified as part of the work object.
• The Internet Mobility Protocol engine itself is queue based. Work elements passed from local clients are placed on a global work queue in FIFO order. This is accomplished by local clients calling a published Internet Mobility protocol function such as “ProtocolRequestwork( )”. A scheduling function inside of Internet Mobility Protocol then removes the work and dispatches it to the appropriate function. Combining the queuing and scheduling mechanisms conceal the differences between operating system architectures—allowing the protocol engine to be run under a threaded based scheme (e.g., Windows NT) or in a synchronous fashion (e.g., Microsoft Windows 9x & Windows CE). A priority scheme can be overlaid on top of its queuing, thus enabling a guaranteed quality of service to be provided (if the underlying network supports it).
• From the network perspective, the Internet Mobility Protocol uses scatter-gather techniques to reduce copying or movement of data. Each transmission is sent to the NAL as a list of fragments, and is coalesced by the network layer transport. If the transport protocol itself supports scatter-gather, the fragment list is passed through the transport and assembled by the media access layer driver or hardware. Furthermore, this technique is extensible in that it allows the insertion or deletion of any protocol wrapper at any level of the protocol stack. Reception of a frame is signaled by the NAL layer by calling back Internet Mobility Protocol at a specified entry point that is designated during the NAL registration process.
• Internet Mobility Protocol Engine Entry Points
• Internet Mobility Protocol in the example implementation exposes four common entry points that control its startup and shutdown behavior. These procedures are:
• • 1. Internet Mobility ProtocolCreate( )
  • 2. Internet Mobility ProtocolRun( )
  • 3. Internet Mobility ProtocolHalt( )
  • 4. Internet Mobility ProtocolUnload( )
    Internet Mobility ProtocolCreate( )
• The Internet Mobility ProtocolCreate( ) function is called by the boot subsystem to initialize the Internet Mobility Protocol. During this first phase, all resource necessary to start processing work must be acquired and initialized. At the completion of this phase, the engine must be in a state ready to accept work from other layers of the system. At this point, Internet Mobility Protocol initializes a global configuration table. To do this, it employs the services of theConfiguration Manager228 to populate the table.
• Next it registers its suspend and resume notification functions with the APM handler. In one example, these functions are only invoked on theMobile End System104 side—but in another implementation it might be desirable to allowMobility Management Server102 to suspend during operations. Other working storage is then allocated from the memory pool, such as the global work queue, and the global NAL portal list.
• To limit the maximum amount of runtime memory required as well as insuring Internet Mobility Protocol handles are unique, Internet Mobility Protocol utilizes a 2-tier array scheme for generating handles. The globalConnectionArray table is sized based on the maximum number of simultaneous connection the system is configured for, and allocated at this time. Once all global storage is allocated and initialized, the global Internet Mobility Protocol state is change to _STATE_INITIALIZE_.
• Internet Mobility ProtocolRun( )
• The Internet Mobility ProtocolRun( ) function is called after all subsystems have been initialized, and to alert the Internet Mobility Protocol subsystem that it is okay to start processing any queued work. This is the normal state that the Internet Mobility Protocol engine is during general operations. A few second pass initialization steps are taken at this point before placing the engine into an operational state.
• Internet Mobility Protocol allows for network communications to occur over any arbitrary interface(s). During the initialization step, the storage for the interface between Internet Mobility Protocol and NAL was allocated. Internet Mobility Protocol now walks through the global portal list to start all listeners at the NAL. In one example, this is comprised of a two step process:
• • Internet Mobility Protocol requests the NAL layer to bind and open the portal based on configuration supplied during initialization time; and
  • Internet Mobility Protocol then notifies the NAL layer that it is ready to start processing received frames by registering the Internet Mobility ProtocolRCVFROMCB call back.
  • A local persistent identifier (PID) is then initialized.
  • The global Internet Mobility Protocol state is change to _STATE_RUN_.
    Internet Mobility ProtocolHalt
• The Internet Mobility ProtocolHalt( ) function is called to alert the engine that the system is shutting down. All resources acquired during its operation are to be release prior to returning from this function. All Internet Mobility Protocol sessions are abnormally terminated with the reason code set to administrative. No further work is accepted from or posted to other layers once the engine has entered into _STATE_HALTED_state.
• Internet Mobility ProtocolUnload( )
• The Internet Mobility ProtocolUnload( ) function is the second phase of the shutdown process. This is a last chance for engine to release any allocated system resources still being held before returning. Once the engine has returned from this function, no further work will be executed as the system itself is terminating
• Internet Mobility Protocol Handles
• In at least some examples, using just the address of the memory (which contains the Internet Mobility Protocol state information) as the token to describe an Internet Mobility Protocol connection may be insufficient. This is mainly due to possibility of one connection terminating and a new one starting in a short period of time. The probability that the memory allocator will reassign the same address for different connections is high—and this value would then denote both the old connection and a new connection. If the original peer did not hear the termination of the session (i.e. it was off, suspended, out of range, etc.), it could possibly send a frame on the old session to the new connection. This happens in TCP and will cause a reset to be generated to the new session if the peer's IP addresses are the same. To avoid this scenario, Internet Mobility Protocol uses manufactured handle. The handles are made up of indexes into two arrays and a nonce for uniqueness. The tables are laid out as follows.
• Table1: an array of pointers to an array of connection object.
• Table2: an array of connection objects that contains the real pointers to the Internet Mobility Protocol control blocks.
• This technique minimizes the amount of memory being allocated at initialization time. Table1 is sized and allocated at startup. On theMobile End System104 side this allows allocation of a small amount of memory (the memory allocation required for this Table1 on theMobility Management Server102 side is somewhat larger since the server can have many connections).
• Table1 is then populated on demand. When a connection request is issued, Internet Mobility Protocol searches through Table1 to find a valid pointer to Table2. If no entries are found, then Internet Mobility Protocol will allocate a new Table2 with a maximum of 256 connection objects—and then stores the pointer to Table2 into the appropriate slot in Table1. The protocol engine then initializes Table2, allocates a connection object from the newly created table, and returns the manufactured handle. If another session is requested, Internet Mobility Protocol will search Table1 once again, find the valid pointer to Table2, and allocate the next connection object for the session. This goes on until one of two situations exist:
• • If all the connection objects are exhausted in Table2, a new Table2 will be allocated, initialized, and a pointer to it will be placed in the next available slot in Table1; and
  • If all connection objects have been released for a specific Table2 instance and all elements are unused for a specified period of time, the storage for that instance of Table2 is released back to the memory pool and the associated pointer in Table1 is zeroed to indicate that that entry is now available for use when the next connection request is started (if and only if no other connection object are available in other instances of Table2).
• Two global counters are maintained to allow limiting the total number of connections allocated. One global counter counts the number of current active connections; and the other keeps track of the number of unallocated connection objects. The second counter is used to govern the total number of connection object that can be created to some arbitrary limit. When a new Table2 is allocated, this counter is adjusted downward to account for the number of objects the newly allocated table represents. On the flip side, when Internet Mobility Protocol releases a Table2 instance back to the memory pool, the counter is adjusted upward with the number of connection objects that are being released.
• Work Flow
• Work is requested by local clients through the Internet Mobility ProtocolRequestWork( ) function. Once the work is validated and placed on the global work queue, the Internet Mobility ProtocolWorkQueueEligible( ) function is invoked. If in a threaded environment, the Internet Mobility Protocol worker thread is signaled (marked eligible) and control is immediately returned to the calling entity. If in a synchronous environment, the global work queue is immediately run to process any work that was requested. Both methods end up executing the Internet Mobility ProtocolProcessWork( ) function. This is the main dispatching function for processing work.
• Since only one thread at a time may be dispatching work from the global queue in the example implementation, a global semaphore may be used to protect against reentrancy. Private Internet Mobility Protocol work can post work directly to the global work queue instead of using the Internet Mobility ProtocolRequestWork( ) function.
• A special case exists for SEND type work objects. To insure that the semantics of Unreliable Datagrams is kept, each SEND type work object can be queued with an expiry time or with a retry count. Work will be aged based on the expiry time. If the specified timeout occurs, the work object is removed from the connection specific queue, and is completed with an error status. If the SEND object has already been coalesced into the data path, the protocol allows for the removal of any SEND object that has specified a retry count. Once the retry count has been exceeded, the object is removed from the list of elements that make up the specific frame, and then returned to the requestor with the appropriate error status.
• Connection Startup
• Internet Mobility Protocol includes a very efficient mechanism to establish connections between peers. Confirmation of a connection can be determined in as little as a three-frame exchange between peers. The initiator sends an IMP SYNC frame to alert its peer that it is requesting the establishment of a connection. The acceptor will either send an IMP ESTABLISH frame to confirm acceptance of the connection, or send an IMP ABORT frame to alert the peer that its connection request has been rejected. Reason and status codes are passed in the IMP ABORT frame to aid the user in decipher the reason for the rejection. If the connection was accepted, an acknowledgement frame is sent (possibly including protocol data unit or control data) and is forwarded to the acceptor to acknowledge receipt of its establish frame.
• To further minimize network traffic, the protocol allows user and control data to be included in the initial handshake mechanism used at connection startup. This ability can be used in an insecure environment or in environments where security is dealt with by a layer below, such that the Internet Mobility Protocol can be tailored to avert the performance penalties due to double security authentication and encryption processing being done over the same data path.
• Data Transfer
• Internet Mobility Protocol relies on signaling from the NAL to detect when a frame has been delivered to the network. It uses this metric to determine if the network link in question has been momentarily flow controlled, and will not submit the same frame for retransmission until the original request has been completed. Some network drivers however lie about the transmission of frames and indicate delivery prior to submitting them to the network. Through the use of semaphores, the Internet Mobility Protocol layer detects this behavior and only will send another datagram until the NAL returns from the original send request
• Once a frame is received by Internet Mobility Protocol, the frame is quickly validated, then placed on an appropriate connection queue. If the frame does not contain enough information for Internet Mobility Protocol to discern its ultimate destination, the frame is placed on the Internet Mobility Protocol socket queue it frame was received on, and then that socket queue is place on the global work queue for subsequence processing. This initial demultiplexing allows received work to be dispersed rapidly with limited processing overhead.
• Acquiescing
• To insure minimal use of network bandwidth during periods of retransmission and processing power on theMobility Management Server102, the protocol allows theMobility Management Server102 to “acquiesce” a connection. After a user configurable period of time, theMobility Management Server102 will stop retransmitting frames for a particular connection if it receives no notification from the correspondingMobile End System104. At this point, theMobility Management Server102 assumes that theMobile End System104 is in some unreachable state (i.e. out of range, suspended, etc), and places the connection into a dormant state. Any further work destined for this particular connection is stored for future delivery. The connection will remain in this state until one of the following conditions are met:
• • Mobility Management Server102 receives a frame from theMobile End System104, thus returning the connection to its original state;
  • a lifetime timeout has expired;
  • an inactivity timeout has expired; or
  • the connection is aborted by the system administrator.
• In the case that theMobility Management Server102 receives a frame from theMobile End System104, the connection continues from the point it was interrupted. Any work that was queued for the specific connection will be forwarded, and the state will be resynchronized. In any of the other cases, theMobile End System104 will be apprised of the termination of the connection once it reconnects; and work that was queued for theMobile End System104 will be discarded.
• Connect and Send Requests
• FIGS. 10A-10C together are a flowchart of example connect and send request logic formed byInternet mobility engine244. In response to receipt from a command fromRPC engine240, the InternetMobility Protocol engine244 determines whether the command is a “connect” request (decision block602). If it is,engine244 determines whether connection resources can be allocated (decision block603). If it is not possible to allocate sufficient connection resources (“no” exit to decision block603),engine244 declares an error (block603a) and returns. Otherwise,engine244 performs a state configuration process in preparation for handling the connect request (block603b).
• For connect and other requests,engine244 queues the connect or send request and signals a global event before return to the calling application (block604).
• To dispatch a connect or send request from the Internet Mobility Protocol global request queue,engine244 first determines whether any work is pending (decision block605). If no work is pending (“no” exit to decision block605),engine244 waits for the application to queue work for the connection by going toFIG. 10C, block625 (block605a). If there is work pending (“yes” exit to decision block605),engine244 determines whether the current state has been established (block606). If the state establish has been achieved (“yes” exit to decision block606),engine244 can skip steps used to transition into establish state and jump to decision block615 ofFIG. 10B (block606a). Otherwise,engine244 must perform a sequence of steps to enter establish state (“no” exit to decision block606).
• In order to enter establish state,engine244 first determines whether the address of its peer is known (decision block607). If not,engine244 waits for the peer address while continuing to queue work and transitions toFIG. 10C block625 (block607a). If the peer address is known (“yes” exit to decision block607),engine244 next tests whether the requisite security context has been acquired (decision block608). If not,engine244 must wait for the security context while continuing to queue work and transitioning to block625 (block608a). If security context has already been acquired (“yes” exit to decision block608),engine244 declares a “state pending” state (block608b), and then sends an Internet Mobility Protocol sync frame (block609) and starts a retransmit timer (block610).Engine244 determines whether the corresponding established frame was received (block611). If it was not (“no” exit to decision block611),engine244 tests whether the retransmit time has expired (decision block612). If the decision block has not expired (“no” exit to decision block612),engine244 waits and may go to step625 (block613). Eventually, if the established frame is never received (as tested for by block611) and a total retransmit time expires (decision block614), the connection may be aborted (block614a). If the established is eventually received (“yes” exit to decision block611),engine244 declares a “state established” state (block611a).
• Once state establish has been achieved,engine244 tests whether the new connection has been authenticated (decision block615). If it has not been,engine244 may wait and transition to step625 (block616). If the connection has been authenticated (“yes” exit to decision block615),engine244 tests whether authentication succeeded (decision block617). If it did not (“no” exit to decision block617), the connection is aborted (block614a). Otherwise,engine244 tests whether the peer transmit window is full (decision block618). If it is (“yes” exit to decision block618),engine244 waits for acknowledgment and goes to step625 (decision block619). If the window is not full (“no” exit to decision block618),engine244 creates an Internet Mobility Protocol data frame (block620) and sends it (block621).Engine244 then determines if the retransmit timer has started (decision block622). If no,engine244 starts the retransmit timer (block623).Engine244 loops through blocks618-623 until there is no more data to send (as tested for by decision block624).Engine244 then returns to a sleep mode waiting for more work and returns to the global dispatcher (block625).
• Termination
• FIG. 11 is a flowchart of example steps performed by InternetMobility Protocol engine244 to terminate a connection. In response to a “terminate connection” request (block626), the engine queues the request to its global work queue and returns to the calling application (block626a). The terminate request is eventually dispatched from the Internet Mobility Protocol process global work queue for execution (block627).Engine244 examines the terminate request and determines whether the terminate request should be immediate or graceful (decision block628). If immediate (“abort” exit to decision block628),engine244 immediately aborts the connection (block629). If graceful (“graceful” exit to decision block628),engine244 declares a “state close” state (block628a), and sends an Internet Mobility Protocol “Mortis” frame (block630) to indicate to the peer that the connection is to close.Engine244 then declares a “Mortis” state (block630a) and starts the retransmit timer (block631).Engine244 tests whether the response of “post mortem” frame has been received from the peer (decision block632). If not (“no” exit to decision block632),engine244 determines whether a retransmit timer has yet expired (decision block633). If the retransmit timer is not expired (“no” exit to decision block633),engine244 waits and proceeds to step637 (block634). If the retransmit timer has expired (“yes” exit to decision block633),engine244′ determines whether the total retransmit time has expired (decision block635). If the total time is not yet expired (“no” exit to decision block635), control returns to block630 to resent the Mortis frame. If the total retransmit time has expired (“yes” exit to decision block635),engine244 immediately aborts the connection (block635a).
• Once a “post mortem” responsive frame has been received from the peer (“yes” exit to decision block632),engine244 declares a “post mortem” state (block632a), releases connection resources (block636), and returns to sleep waiting for more work (block637).
• Retransmission
• FIG. 12 is a flowchart of example “retransmit” events logic performed by InternetMobility Protocol engine244. In the event that the retransmit timer has expired (block650),engine244 determines whether any frames are outstanding (decision block651). If no frames are outstanding (“no” exit to decision block651),engine244 dismisses the timer (block652) and returns to sleep (block660). If, on the other hand, frames are outstanding (“yes” exit to decision block651),engine244 determines whether the entire retransmit period has expired (decision block653). If it has not (“no” exit to decision block653), the process returns to sleep for the difference in time (block654). If the entire retransmit time period has expired (“yes” exit to decision block653),engine244 determines whether a total retransmit period has expired (decision block655). If it has (“yes” exit to decision block655) and this event has occurred in the MobilityManagement Server engine244′ (as opposed to the Mobile End System engine244), a dormant state is declared (decision block656, block656a). Under these same conditions, the InternetMobility Protocol engine244 executing on theMobile End System104 will abort the connection (block656b).
• If the total retransmit period is not yet expired (“no” exit to decision block655),engine244 reprocesses the frame to remove any expired data (block657) and then retransmits it (block658)—restarting the retransmit timer as it does so (block659). The process then returns to sleep (block660) to wait for the next event.
• Internet Mobility Protocol Expiration of a PDU
• FIG. 12block657 allows for the requesting upper layer interface to specify a timeout or retry count for expiration of any protocol data unit (i.e. a SEND work request) submitted for transmission to the associated peer. By use of this functionality, InternetMobility Protocol engine244 maintains the semantics of unreliable data and provides other capabilities such as unreliable data removal from retransmitted frames. Each PDU (protocol data unit)506 submitted by the layer above can specify a validity timeout and/or retry count for each individual element that will eventually be coalesced by the InternetMobility Protocol engine244. The validity timeout and/or retry count (which can be user-specified for some applications) are used to determine whichPDUs506 should not be retransmitted but should instead be removed from a frame prior to retransmission byengine244.
• The validity period associated with aPDU506 specifies the relative time period that the respective PDU should be considered for transmission. During submission, the Internet Mobility Protocol RequestWork function checks the expiry timeout value. If it is non-zero, an age timer is initialized. The requested data is then queued on the same queue as all other data being forwarded to the associated peer. If the givenPDU506 remains on the queue for longer than the time period specified by the validity period parameter, during the next event that the queue is processed, the given (all) PDU(s) that has an expired timeout is removed and completed locally with a status code of “timeout failure” rather than being retransmitted when the frame is next retransmitted. This algorithm ensures that unreliable data being queued for transmission to the peer will not grow stale and/or boundlessly consume system resources.
• In the example shown inFIG. 12A, threeseparate PDUs506 are queued to InternetMobility Protocol engine244 for subsequent processing. PDU506(1) is queued without an expiry time denoting no timeout for the given request. PDU506(2) is specified with a validity period of2 seconds and is chronologically queued after PDU506(1). PDU506(n) is queued 2.5 seconds after PDU506(2) was queued. Since the act of queuing PDU506(n) is the first event causing processing of the queue and PDU506(2) expiry time has lapsed, PDU506(2) is removed from the work queue, completed locally and then PDU506(n), is placed on the list. If a validity period was specified for PDU506(n) the previous sequence of events would be repeated. Any event (queuing, dequeuing, etc) that manipulates the work queue will cause stale PDUs to be removed and completed.
• As described above,PDUs506 are coalesced by the InternetMobility Protocol Engine244 transmit logic and formatted into a single data stream. Each discrete work element, if not previously expired by the validity timeout, is gathered to formulate Internet Mobility Protocol data frames. InternetMobility Protocol Engine244 ultimately sends thesePDUs506 to the peer, and then places the associated frame on a Frames-Outstanding list. If the peer does not acknowledge the respective frame in a predetermined amount of time (seeFIG. 12 showing the retransmission algorithm), the frame is retransmitted to recover from possibly a lost or corrupted packet exchange. Just prior to retransmission, the PDU list that the frame is comprised of is iterated through to determine if any requests were queued with a retry count. If the retry count is non zero, and the value is decremented to zero, thePDU506 is removed from the list, and the frames header is adjusted to denote the deletion of data. In this fashion, stale data, unreliable data, or applications employing their own retransmission policy are not burdened byengine244's retransmission algorithm.
• In theFIG. 12B example, again threeseparate PDUs506 are queued to InternetMobility Protocol engine244 for subsequent processing. PDU506(1) is queued without a retry count. This denotes continuous retransmission attempts or guaranteed delivery level of service. PDU506(2) is queued with a retry count of 1 and is chronologically queued after PDU506(1). PDU506(n) is queued sometime after PDU506(2). At this point, some external event (e.g., upper layer coalesce timer, etc.) causesengine244's send logic to generate a new frame by gatheringenough PDUs506 from the work queue to generate an Internet MobilityProtocol data frame500. Theframe header503 is calculated and stamped with a retry ID of 0 to denote that this is the first transmission of the frame. The frame is then handed to the NAL layer for subsequent transmission to the network. At this point a retransmit timer is started since the frame in question contains a payload. For illustration purposes it is assumed that an acknowledgement is not received from the peer for a variety of possible reasons before the retransmit timer expires. The retransmit logic ofengine244 determines that theframe500 in question is now eligible for retransmission to the network. Prior to resubmitting the frame to the NAL layer,engine244's retransmit logic iterates through the associated list ofPDUs506. Each PDU's retry count is examined and if non-zero, the count is decremented. In the process of decrementing PDU506(2)'s retry count, the retry count becomes zero. Because PDU506(2)'s retry count has gone to zero, it is removed from the list and completed locally with a status of “retry failure.” Theframe header503 size is then adjusted to denote the absence of the PDU506(2)'s data. This process is repeated for all remaining PDUs. Once theentire frame500 is reprocessed to produce an “edited”frame500′, the retry ID in the header is incremented and the resultant datagram is then handed to the NAL layer for subsequent (re)transmission.
• Reception
• FIGS. 13A-13D are a flowchart of example steps performed by InternetMobility Protocol engine244 in response to receipt of a “receive” event. Such receive events are generated when an Internet Mobility Protocol frame has been received fromnetwork108. In response to this receive event,engine244 pre-validates the event (block670) and tests whether it is a possible Internet Mobility Protocol frame (decision block671). Ifengine244 determines that the received frame is not a possible frame (“no” exit to decision block671), it discards the frame (block672). Otherwise (“yes” exit to decision block671),engine244 determines whether there is a connection associated with the received frame (decision block673). If there is a connection associated with the received frame (“yes” exit to decision block673),engine244 places the work on the connection receive queue (block674), marks the connection as eligible to receive (block675), and places the connection on the global work queue (block676). If no connection has yet been associated with the received frame (“no” exit to decision block673),engine244 places the received frame on the socket receive queue (block677) and places the socket receive queue on the global work queue (block678). In either case,engine244 signals a global work event (block679). Upon dispatching of a “receive eligible” event from the global work queue (seeFIG. 13B),engine244 de-queues the frame from the respective receive queue (block680). It is possible that more then one IMP frame is received and queued before the InternetMobility Protocol engine244 can start de-queuing the messages.Engine244 loops until all frames have been de-queue (blocks681,682). Once a frame has been de-queued (“yes” exit to decision block681),engine244 validates the received frame (block683) and determines whether it is okay (decision block684). If the received frame is invalid,engine244 discards it (block685) and de-queues the next frame from the receive queue (block680). If the received frame is valid (“yes” exit to decision block684),engine244 determines whether it is associated with an existing connection (block686). If it is not (“no” exit to decision block686),engine244 tests whether it is a sync frame (decision block687). If it is not a sync frame (“no” exit to decision block687), the frame is discarded (block685). If, on the other hand, a sync frame has been received (“yes” exit to decision block687),engine244 processes it using a passive connection request discussed in association withFIGS. 14A and 14B (block688).
• If the frame is associated with a connection (“yes” exit to decision block686),engine244 determines whether the connection state is still active and not “post mortem” (decision block689). If the connection is already “post mortem,” the frame is discarded (block685). Otherwise,engine244 parses the frame (block690) and determines whether it is an abort frame (decision block691). If the frame is an abort frame,engine244 immediately aborts the connection (block691a). If the frame is not an abort frame (“yes” exit to decision block691),engine244 processes acknowledgment information and releases any outstanding send frames (block692).Engine244 then posts the frame to any security subsystem for possible decryption (block693). Once the frame is returned from thesecurity subsystem engine244 processes any control data (block694).Engine244 then determines whether the frame contains application data (decision block695). If it does, this data is queued to the application layer (block696).Engine244 also determines whether the connection's state is dormant (block697 and697a—this can happen on MobilityManagement Server engine244′ in the preferred implementation), and returns state back to established.
• If the frame is possibly a “Mortis” frame (“yes” exit to decision block698),engine244 indicates a “disconnect” to the application layer (block699) and enters the “Mortis” state (block699a). It sends a “post mortem” frame to the peer (block700), and enters the “post mortem” state (block700a).Engine244 then releases connection resources (block701) and returns to sleep waiting for more work (block702). If the parsed frame is a “post mortem” frame (“yes” exit to decision block703), blocks700a,701,702 are executed. Otherwise, control returns to block680 to dequeue the next frame from the receive queue (block704).
• Passive Connections
• Blocks14A-14B are together a flowchart of example steps performed by InternetMobility Protocol engine244 in response to a “passive connection” request.Engine244 first determines whether there is another connection for this particular device (block720). If there is (“yes” exit to decision block720), the engine determines whether it is the initial connection (decision block721). If peer believes the new connection is the initial connection (“yes” exit to decision block721),engine244 aborts the previous connections (block722). If not the initial connection (“no” exit to decision block721),engine244 tests whether the sequence and connection ID match (decision block723). If they do not match (“no” exit to decision block723), control returns todecision block720. If the sequence and connection ID do match (“yes” exit to decision block723),engine244 discards duplicate frames (block724) and returns to step680 ofFIG. 13B (block725).
• If there is no other connection (“no” exit to decision block720),engine244 determines whether it can allocate connection resources for the connection (decision block726). If it cannot, an error is declared (“no” exit to decision block726, block727), and the connection is aborted (block728). If it is possible to allocate connection resources (“yes” exit to decision block726),engine244 declares a “configure” state (block726a) and acquires the security context for the connection (block730). If it was not possible to acquire sufficient security context (“no” exit to decision block731), the connection is aborted (block728). Otherwise,engine244 sends an established frame (block732) and declares the connection to be in state “establish” (block732a).Engine244 then starts a retransmitter (block733) and waits for the authentication process to conclude (block734). Eventually,engine244 tests whether the device and user have both been authenticated (block735). If either the device or the user is not authenticated, the connection is aborted (block736). Otherwise,engine244 indicates the connection to the listening application (block737) and gets the configuration (block738). If either of these steps do not succeed, the connection is aborted (decision block739, block740). Otherwise, the process returns to sleep waiting for more work (block741).
• Abnormal Termination
• FIGS. 15A and 15B are a flowchart of example steps performed by the InternetMobility Protocol engine244 in response to an “abort” connection request. Upon receipt of such a request from another process (block999) and are dispatched via the queue (block1000),engine244 determines whether the connection is associated with the request (decision block1001). If it is (“yes” exit to decision block1001),engine244 saves the original'state (block1002) and declares an “abort” state (block1002a).Engine244 then determines whether the connection was indicated to any listening application (decision block1003)—and if so, indicates a disconnect to that listening application (block1004).Engine244 then declares a “post mortem” state (block1003a), releases the resources previously allocated to the particular connection (block1005), and tests whether the original state is greater than the state pending (decision block1006). If not (“no” exit to decision block1006), the process transitions to block1002 to return to the calling routine (block1007). Otherwise,engine244 determines whether the request is associated with a received frame (decision block1008). If the abort request is associated with a received frame, and the received frame is an abort frame (decision block1009), the received frame is discarded (block1010). Otherwiseengine244 will send an abort frame (block1011) before returning to the calling routine (block1012).
• Roaming Control
• Referring once again toFIG. 1,mobile network108 may comprise a number of different segments providing different network interconnects (107a-107kcorresponding to different wireless transceivers106a-106k). In accordance with another aspect of a presently preferred exemplary non-limiting implementation,network108 includingMobility Management Server102 is able to gracefully handle a “roaming” condition in which aMobile End System104 has moved from one network interconnect to another. Commonly,network108 topographies are divided into segments (subnets) for management and other purposes. These different segments typically assign different network (transport) addresses to the variousMobile End Systems104 within the given segment.
• It is common to use a Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) to automatically configure network devices that are newly activated on such a subnet. For example, a DHCP server on the sub-net typically provides its clients with (among other things) a valid network address to “lease”. DHCP clients may not have permanently assigned, “hard coded” network addresses. Instead, at boot time, the DHCP client requests a network address from the DHCP server. The DHCP server has a pool of network addresses that are available for assignment. When a DHCP client requests an network address, the DHCP server assigns, or leases, an available address from that pool to the client. The assigned network address is then “owned” by the client for a specified period (“lease duration”). When the lease expires, the network address is returned to the pool and becomes available for reassignment to another client. In addition to automatically assigning network addresses, DHCP also provides netmasks and other configuration information to clients running DHCP client software. More information concerning the standard DHCP protocol can be found in RFC2131.
• Thus, when aMobile End System104 using DHCP roams from one subnet to another, it will appear with a new network address. In accordance with a presently preferred exemplary non-limiting implementation,Mobile End Systems104 andMobility Management Server102 take advantage of the automatic configuration functionality of DHCP, and coordinate together to ensure that the Mobility Management Server recognizes the Mobile End System's “new” network address and associates it with the previously-established connection the Mobility Management Server is proxying on its behalf.
• The preferred implementation uses standard DHCP Discover/Offer client-server broadcast messaging sequences as an echo request-response, along with other standard methodologies in order to determine if aMobile End System104 has roamed to a new subnet or is out of range. In accordance with the standard DHCP protocol, aMobile End System104 requiring a network address will periodically broadcast client identifier and hardware address as part of a DHCP Discover message. The DHCP server will broadcast its Offer response (this message is broadcast rather than transmitted specifically to the requesting Mobile End System because the Mobile End System doesn't yet have a network address to send to). Thus, anyMobile End System104 on the particular subnet will pick up any DHCP Offer server response to any other Mobile End System broadcast on the same subnet.
• A presently preferred exemplary implementation of present non-limiting implementation provides DHCP listeners to monitor the DHCP broadcast messages and thereby ascertain whether a particularMobile End System104 has roamed from one subnet to another and is being offered the ability to acquire a new network address by DHCP.FIG. 16 shows example DHCP listener data structures. For example, a Mobile End Systemlistener data structure902 may comprise:
• • a linked list of server data structures,
  • an integer transaction ID number (xid),
  • a counter (“ping”), and
  • a timeout value.
    Aserver data structure904 may comprise a linked list of data blocks each defining a different DHCP server, each data block comprising:
  • a pointer to next server,
  • a server ID (network address of a DHCP server),
  • an address (giaddr) of a BOOTP relay agent recently associated with this DHCP server,
  • a “ping” value (socket->ping), and
  • a flag.
• These data structures are continually updated based on DHCP broadcast traffic appearing onnetwork108. The following example functions can be used to maintain these data structures:
• • roamCreate( ) [initialize variables]
  • roamDeinitialize( ) [delete all listeners]
  • roamStartlndications( ) [call a supplied callback routine when a Mobile End System has roamed or changed interfaces, to give a registrant roaming indications]
  • roamStoplndications( ) [remove the appropriate callback from the list, to stop giving a registrant roaming indications]
  • Interface Change [callback notification from operating system indicating an interface has changed its network address]* Listener Signal [per-interface callback from a Listener indicating a roaming or out-of-range or back-in-range condition].
• Additionally, a refresh process may be used to update Listeners after interface changes.
• In the preferred implementation, allMobile End Systems104 transmit the same Client Identifier and Hardware Address in DHCP Discover requests. This allows the listener data structures and associated processes to distinguish Mobile End System-originated Discover requests from Discover requests initiated by other network devices. Likewise, the DHCP server will broadcast its response, so anyMobile End System104 and/or theMobility Management Server102 will be able to pick up the DHCP server Offer response to any other Mobile End System. Since multiple DHCP servers can respond to a single DHCP Discover message, the listener data structures shown inFIG. 16 store each server response in a separate data block, tied to the main handle via linked list.
• Upon receiving a Discover request having the predetermined Client Hardware Address and Client Identifier, the preferred implementation recognizes this request as coming from aMobile End System104. If the message also has a BOOTP relay address set to zero, this indicates that the message originated on the same subnet as the listener. Listeners may ignore all DHCP Offers unless they have a transaction ID (xid) matching that of a Discover message recently sent by aMobile End System104. The listener can determine that aMobile End System104 has roamed if any response comes from a known server with a new BOOTP relay agent ID and/or offered network address masked with an offered subnet mask. Listeners add new servers to theFIG. 16 data structures only after receiving a positive response from an old server. If a listener receives responses from new server(s) but none from an old server, this may indicate roaming (this can be a configurable option). If the listener fails to receive responses from new or old servers, the listener is out of range (this determination can be used to signal an upper layer such as an application to halt or reduce sending of data to avoid buffer overflow).
• If the listener never receives a response from any server, there is no point of reference and thus impossible to determine whether roaming has occurred. This condition can be handled by signaling an error after a timeout and allowing the caller to retry the process. The preferred implementation determines that aMobile End System104 has roamed if any response has come from a known server with a new BOOTP relay agent ID (or a new offered network address when masked with offered subnet mask). If the listener data structures see responses from new servers but none from an old server, it is possible that roaming has occurred, but there must be a delay before signaling, in order to wait for any potential responses from the old servers. If there are no responses from new or old servers, then theMobile End System104 is probably out of range andMobility Management Server102 waits for it to come back into range.
• FIG. 17 is a flowchart of example steps of a Listener process of the preferred implementation. Referring toFIG. 17, a DHCP listener process is created by allocating appropriate memory for the handle, opening NAL sockets for the DHCP client and server UDP ports, and setting receive callbacks for both. A timer is then set (block802) and then the process enters the “Wait” state to wait for a roaming related event (block804). Three external inputs can trigger an event:
• • a DHCP server packet is received;
  • a DHCP client packet sent by another Mobile End System is received
  • a timer timeout occurs.
• If a DHCP server packet has been received, the packet is examined to determine whether its client identifier matches the predetermined client ID (decision block806). If it does not, it is discarded. However, if the packet does contain the predetermined ID, a test is performed to determine whether the packet is a DHCP Offer packet (decision block808). Offer packets are rejected unless they contain a transaction ID matching a recently sent DHCP Discover sequence.
• If the packet transaction ID matches (block810), then a test is made as to whether the server sending the DHCP offer packet is known (i.e., the server ID is in the listener data structure shown inFIG. 16) (block812). If the server ID is not on the list (“no” exit to decision block812), it is added to the list and marked as “new” (or “first” if it is the first server on the list) (block822). If the server is already on the list (“Y” exit to decision block812), a further test is performed to determine whether the packet BOOTP relay address (“GIADDR”) matches the server address (“GIADDR”) (decision block814). If there is no match, then the Offer packet must be originating from a different subnet, and it is determined that a “hard roam” has occurred (block816). The caller application is signaled that there has been a roam. If, on the other hand,decision block814 determines there is a match in BOOTP relay addresses, then no roam has occurred, the listener process stamps the server receive time, resets “new” flags for all other servers on the list, and stores the current ping number with the server (block818,820). The process then returns to “wait” period.
• If the event is a received client packet, the listener process determines whether the packet has the predetermined client ID, is a DHCP Discover packet and has a BOOTP relay address (GIADDR) of 0 (blocks824,826,828). These steps determine whether the received packet is DHCP Discover message sent by anotherMobile End System104 on the same sub-net as the listener. If so, the listener process then sets the transaction ID to the peer's transaction ID (block830) for use in comparing with later-received DHCP Offer packets, calls a ping check (block834) and resets the timer (block836).
• In response to a timer timeout, the process calls a “ping check” (block838). “Pings” in the preferred implementation are DHCP Discover packets with a random new xid. Example steps for this ping check838 are shown inFIG. 17A. The purpose of the ping check routine is to determine if a “soft roam” condition has occurred (i.e., a Mobile End System has temporarily lost and then regained contact with a sub-net, but has not roamed to a different sub-net). The process determines whether there is a sub-net roam condition, an out-of-range condition, or a “no server” condition. In other words:
• • Has a Mobile End System roamed from one sub-net to another?
  • Is a Mobile End System out of range?
  • Is a DHCP server absent?
• These conditions are determined by comparing Mobile End System prior “ping” response with the current “ping” response (decision blocks846,850). For example, if the current ping number minus the old server's last ping response is greater than the sub-net server pings and there is at least one server marked “new,” there has been a sub-net roam to a different server. The result of this logic is to either signal a subset roam, and out of range condition or a no server condition (or none of these) to the calling process.
• FIG. 18 shows a flowchart of example steps performed by aMobile End System104 roaming control center. To enable roaming at theMobile End System104, the list of known addresses is initialized to zero (block850) and an operating system interface change notification is enabled (block852). The process then calls the operating system to get a list of current addresses that use DHCP (block854). All known addresses no longer in the current list have their corresponding listeners closed (block856). Similarly, the process opens listeners on all current but not known interfaces (block858). The process then signals “roam” to registrants (block860).1001831 When the listener process ofFIG. 17 signals (block862), the process determines whether the signal indicates a “roam” , “out of range” or “back in range” condition (decision block864,870,874). A roam signal (“yes” exit to decision block864) causes the process to closecorresponding listener866 and call the operating system to release and renew DHCP lease to a network address (block868). If the listener signals “out of range” (decision block870), the process signals this condition to registrants (block872). If the signal is a “back in range” (decision block874), then this condition is signaled to all registrants (block876). Upon receiving a disabled roam command (block878), the process closes all listeners (block880) and disables the operating system interface change notification (block882).
EXAMPLES
• A presently preferred exemplary implementation of present non-limiting implementation finds application in a variety of real-world situations. For example:
• Intermittently Connected Portable Computer
• Many businesses have employees who occasionally telecommute or work from home. Such employees often use laptop computers to get their work done. While at work, the employees typically connect their laptop computers to a local area network such as an Ethernet through use of a docking port or other connector. The LAN connection provides access to network services (e.g., printers, network drives) and network applications (e.g., database access, email services).
• Now suppose an employee working on a project needs to go home for the evening and wants to resume working from home. The employee can “suspend” the operating system and applications running on the laptop computer, pack up the laptop computer, and bring the laptop computer home.
• Once home, the employee can “resume” the operating system and applications running on the laptop computer, and reconnect to the office LAN via a dialup connection and/or over the Internet. The Mobility Management Server (which continued to proxy the laptop computer vis-a-vis the network and its applications during the time the laptop computer was temporarily suspended) can re-authenticate the laptop computer and resume communicating with the laptop computer.
• From the perspective of the employee now working from home, all of the network drive mappings, print services, email sessions, database queries, and other network services and applications, are exactly where the employee left them at the office. Furthermore, because the Mobility Management Service continued to proxy the laptop computer's sessions, none of those network applications terminated the laptop computer's sessions during the time the employee was traveling from the office to home. The exemplary implementation thus provides efficient persistence of session across the same or multiple network mediums that is very powerful and useful in this and other contexts.
• Mobile Inventory and Warehouse Application
• Imagine a large warehouse or retail chain. Within this campus, inventory workers use vehicle mounted (i.e., trucks and forklifts) personal laptop computers and handheld data collection units and terminals to perform inventory management of goods. Warehouse and retail workers are often inexperienced computer users that do not understand network sub-nets and require management supervision. A presently preferred exemplary implementation allows the creation of a turnkey system that hides the complexity of the mobile network from the warehouse users. The users can move in and out of range of access points, suspend and resume theirMobile End Systems104, and change locations without concern for host sessions, network addresses, or transport connections. In addition, the management software on theMobility Management Server102 provides management personnel with metrics such as number of transactions, which may be used to gauge worker productivity. Management can also use the network sub-net and access points to determine worker's last known physical location.
• Mobile Medical Application
• Imagine a large hospital using radio LAN technology for network communications between several buildings. Each building is on a unique sub-net. A presently preferred exemplary implementation enables nurses and doctors to move from room to room with handheld personal computers or terminals—reading and writing patient information in hospital databases. Access to the most recent articles on medication and medical procedures is readily available through the local database and the World Wide Web. While in the hospital, pagers (one and two way) are no longer required since a presently preferred exemplary implementation of the present invention allows continuous connection to theMobile End System104. Messages can be sent directly to medical personnel via theMobile End System104. As in the case with warehouse workers, medical personnel are not required to understand the mobile network they are using. In addition, theMobile End System104 allows medical personnel to disable radio transmission in area where radio emissions are deemed undesirable (e.g., where they might interfere with other medical equipment)—and easily resume and reconnect where they left off.
• Trucking and Freight
• Freight companies can a presently preferred exemplary implementation of use the present invention to track inventory. While docked at a warehouse, theMobile End System104 may use LAN technology to update warehouse inventories. While away from local services, theMobile End System104 can use Wide Area WAN services such as CDPD and ARDIS to maintain real time status and location of inventory. TheMobile End System104 automatically switches between network infrastructures—hiding the complexity of network topology from vehicle personnel.
• Mobile Enterprise
• Corporate employees may use the system in accordance with a presently preferred exemplary implementation for access to E-mail, web content and messaging services while within an enterprise campus that has invested in an infrastructure such as 802.11. The cost of ownership is reduced since pager service and other mobile device services are no longer required. The purchase of mobile infrastructure is a one time capital expense as opposed to the costly “pay-per-use” model offered by many existing mobile device services.
• IP Multiplication
• If an organization has a LAN that needs to be connected to the Internet, the administrator of the LAN has two choices: get enough globally assigned addresses for all computers on the LAN, or get just a few globally assigned addresses and use theMobility Management Server102 in accordance with a presently preferred exemplary non-limiting implementation as an address multiplier. Getting a large number of IP addresses tends to be either expensive or impossible. A small company using an Internet Service Provider (ISP) for access to the Internet can only use the IP addresses the ISP assigns—and the number of IP addresses limits the number of computers that can be on the Internet at the same time. An ISP also charges per connection, so the more computers that need to be on the Internet, the more expensive this solution becomes.
• Using theMobility Management Server102 in accordance with the present non-limiting exemplary implementation as an address multiplier could solve many of these problems. The enterprise could put theMobility Management Server102 on hardware that is connected to the Internet via an ISP.Mobile End Systems104 could then easily connect. Because all connection to the Internet would go through theMobility Management Server102, only one address from the ISP is required. Thus, using a presently preferred exemplary non-limiting implementation as an address multiplier allows the enterprise to get just a few (in many cases one) addresses and accounts from the ISP, and allows the entire LAN to have simultaneous connections to the Internet (assuming enough bandwidth is provided).
• While the has been described in connection with what is presently considered to be the most practical and preferred implementation, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed implementation, but on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims (16)

1. In a computer network providing communication between plural devices, said network providing resources to said plural devices, a method of managing said resource consumption including:

enforcing globally, per-device, per-device group, per-user group, and/or per-user policy management for managing consumption of said resources by said devices; and

distributing the task of managing of said resource consumption between said devices, and a plurality of proxy server(s) for proxying communications between peers and said devices even when a device becomes temporarily disconnected from said network environment.

2. The method ofclaim 1 further including enabling said devices and/or a proxy server to either allow, deny and/or delay consumption of said network resources.

3. The method ofclaim 1 including assigning at least one relative priority to different users, devices, applications or tasks, and controls consumption of network resources based at least in part on said at least one relative priority.

4. The method ofclaim 1 wherein said enforcing step includes prioritizing, granting, denying, and/or delaying access to said network resources

5. The method ofclaim 1 wherein said enforcing step comprises configuring said priorities.

6. The method ofclaim 1 wherein said enforcing step comprises configuring access to said network resources.

7. The method ofclaim 1 wherein said enforcing step comprises assigning priorities based on but not limited to user name, user group, device group, device identifier application name, process name, and/or transmit/receive path.

8. The method ofclaim 1 wherein said enforcing step includes selecting between plural priority levels.

9. In a computer network providing communication between plural devices, said network providing resources to said plural devices, a system of managing said resource consumption including:

means for globally, per-device, per-device group, per-user group, and/or per-user policy management for managing consumption of said resources by said devices; and

means for distributing the task of managing of said resource consumption between said devices, and a plurality of proxy server(s) for proxying communications between peers and said devices even during times a device becomes temporarily disconnected from said network.

10. The system ofclaim 9 further including means for enabling said devices and/or a proxy server to either allow, deny and/or delay consumption of said network resources.

11. The system ofclaim 9 wherein said system assigns relative priorities to different users, devices or tasks, and controls consumption of network resources based at least in part on said priorities.

12. The system ofclaim 9 wherein said enforcing means includes means for prioritizing, granting, denying, and/or delaying access to said network resources

13. The system ofclaim 9 wherein said enforcing means comprises means for configuring said at least one priority.

14. The system ofclaim 9 wherein said enforcing means comprises means for configuring access to said network resources.

15. The system ofclaim 9 wherein said enforcing means comprises means for assigning priority based on but not limited to user name, user group, device group, device identifier application name, process name, and/or transmit/receive path.

16. The system ofclaim 9 wherein said enforcing means includes means for selecting between plural priority levels.

Images