US20050137595A1 - Method and apparatus for spinal fusion - Google Patents

Abstract

Disclosed is a bone fracture fixation device, such as for reducing and compressing fractures in the proximal femur. The fixation device includes an elongate body with a helical cancellous bone anchor on a distal end. An axially moveable proximal anchor is carried by the proximal end of the fixation device. The device is rotated into position across the fracture or separation between adjacent bones and into the adjacent bone or bone fragment, and the proximal anchor is distally advanced to apply secondary compression and lock the device into place. The device may also be used for soft tissue attachments.

Description

PRIORITY INFORMATION
• This invention is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/822,803, filed Mar. 30, 2001, the entire contents of which are hereby expressly incorporated herein by reference.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
• 1. Field of the Invention
• The present invention relates to internal bone fracture fixation devices. In one application, the present invention relates to bone fracture fixation devices and methods adapted for fixation, among other fractures, of femoral neck and other proximal femoral fractures.
• 2. Description of the Related Art
• The femur, otherwise known as the thigh bone, generally comprises an elongate shaft extending from the hip to the knee. The proximal end of the shaft includes a head, a neck, a greater trochanter and a lesser trochanter. The head of the femur fits into the acetabular cup of the hip bone to form a ball and socket joint at the hip. The distal end of the femur includes a medial condyle and a lateral condyle. The condyles engage an upper end of the tibia to form the knee joint. Overall, the femur is the longest and strongest bone in the skeleton. However, portions of the femur are extremely susceptible to fracturing.
• Pertrochanteric fractures among geriatric patients are the most frequent in connection with those of the region of the neck of the bone. The advanced age and the pathologies which are encountered in these patients make a timely stabilization of skeletal injuries necessary in order to reduce to a minimum the bed confinement and the rehabilitation times. Preferably, devices and procedures are utilized which minimize complications brought about by the so-called immobilization syndrome, which may be lethal for patients in delicate metabolical circumstances. It is also preferable to reduce to a minimum blood losses related to surgical intervention. At the same time, the syntheses means utilized must be stable in order to allow the patient to very timely assume a seated position and, two or three days following the intervention, to reassume an erect posture with progressive bearing of weight.
• Internal fixation of femoral fractures in general is one of the most common orthopedic surgical procedures. Fractures of the femur occur in both the proximal portion of the femur and the distal portion of the femur. Fractures of the proximal portion of the femur (hip fractures) are generally classified as femoral neck fractures (capital or sub-capital), intertrochanteric fractures and subtrochanteric fractures. Fractures of the distal portion of the femur (knee fractures) are referred to as supracondylar fractures. Supracondylar fractures generally extend vertically between the condyles at the lower end of the femur to separate the distal portion of the femur into two main bone fragments. A fracture line may be further comminuted to create a plurality of smaller bone fragments. Fractures of the femur which extend into the neck of the bone are generally more difficult to treat than fractures restricted to the shaft of the femur.
• Operative treatment of the fractures requires that the fractures be internally fixed and possibly compressed. Fractures of the neck, head or trochanters of the femur have been treated with a variety of compression screw assemblies which include generally a compression plate having a barrel member, a lag screw and a compressing screw. The compression plate is secured to the exterior of the femur and the barrel member is inserted into a predrilled hole in the direction of the femoral head. The lag screw which has a threaded end and a smooth portion is inserted through the barrel member so that it extends across the break and into the femoral head. The threaded portion engages the femoral head. The compressing screw connects the lag screw to the plate. By adjusting the tension of the compressing screw the compression (reduction) of the fracture can be adjusted.
• A variety of elongated implants (nail, screw, pin, etc.) have been developed, which are adapted to be positioned along the longitudinal axis of the femoral neck with a leading (distal) end portion in the femoral head so as to stabilize a fracture of the femoral neck. The elongated implant may be implanted by itself or connected to another implant such as a side plate or intramedullary rod. The leading end portion of the implant typically includes means to positively grip the femoral head bone (external threads, expanding arms, etc.), but the inclusion of such gripping means can introduce several significant problems. First, implants with sharp edges on the leading end portion, such as the externally threaded implants, exhibit a tendency to migrate proximally towards the hip joint weight bearing surface after implantation. This can occur when the proximal cortical bone has insufficient integrity to resist distal movement of the screw head. Such proximal migration under physiological loading, which is also referred to as femoral head cut-out, can lead to significant damage to the adjacent hip joint. Also, the externally threaded implants can generate large stress concentrations in the bone during implantation which can lead to stripping of the threads formed in the bone and thus a weakened grip. The movable arms of known expanding arm devices are usually free at one end and attached at the other end to the main body of the leading end portion of the implant. As a result, all fatigue loading is concentrated at the attached ends of the arms and undesirably large bending moments are realized at the points of attachment. In addition, conventional threaded implants generally exhibit insufficient holding power under tension, such that the threads can be stripped out of the femoral head either by overtightening during the implantation procedure or during post operative loading by the patient's weight.
• Thus, notwithstanding the variety of efforts in the prior art, there remains a need for an orthopedic fixation device with improved locking force such as within the femoral head in a femoral neck application, which resists migration and rotation, and which can be easily and rapidly deployed within the bone.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
• There is provided in accordance with one aspect of the present invention, a method of securing a first bone fragment to a second bone fragment. The method comprises the steps of drilling a bore through the first bone fragment in the direction of the second bone fragment, and advancing through the bore a fixation device comprising a first portion and a second portion that are coupled to each other. A distal anchor of the fixation device is rotated to secure the fixation device to the second fragment, and the proximal anchor is axially advanced to engage the first fragment and provide compression across the fracture.
• In one application of the method, the second bone fragment comprises the head of a femur. Alternatively, the second bone fragment comprises a tibia, a fibula, a femur, a humurus, a radius, or an ulna. The first bone fragment may comprise a condyle.
• The method may additionally comprise the step of uncoupling the first portion from the second portion.
• In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a femoral neck fracture fixation device. The device comprises an elongate body, having a proximal end and a distal end and a helical anchor on the distal end. The helical anchor is wrapped about a central core or axial lumen. An outer edge of the helical anchor defines an outer boundary and the central core or axial lumen defines a minor diameter. A first retention structure is provided on the body, proximal to the anchor. A proximal anchor is moveably carried by the body. The proximal anchor is movable in the distal direction with respect to the body and the retention structure resists proximal movement of the proximal anchor with respect to the body.
• In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention, there is provided a bone fracture fixation device. The device comprises an elongate body having a proximal end and a distal end. A cancellous bone anchor is on the distal end. The cancellous bone anchor comprises a helical flange wrapped about a central core or axial lumen. An outer edge of the helical anchor defines an outer boundary and the central core or axial lumen defines a minor diameter. A proximal anchor is axially movably carried on the body. Complimentary surface structures are provided between the body and the proximal anchor that permit advancing the proximal anchor in the distal direction to provide compression across a fracture but that resist axial proximal movement of the proximal anchor.
• In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of treating a femoral fracture. The method comprises the steps of drilling at least one and preferably two or three bores distally into the femur in the direction of a fracture, and advancing into each bore a fixation device that comprises a body having a first portion that forms a distal bone anchor and a second portion that forms a proximal end. A proximal component is rotated to engage the distal anchor with the bone distal to the fracture, and a proximal anchor is advanced distally along the fixation device to compress the fracture.
• In accordance with another aspect of the invention a bone fracture fixation device comprises an elongate body having a proximal end and a distal end. The body also includes a helical anchor on the distal end. A first retention structure is on the body located proximal to the anchor. A proximal anchor is moveably carried by the body and has a tubular housing. The tubular housing has at least one barb extending radially outwardly from the tubular housing and defining an engagement surface that lies within a plane that is transverse to a longitudinal axis of the tubular housing. The proximal anchor is movable in the distal direction with respect to the body and the retention structure resists proximal movement of the proximal anchor with respect to the body.
• Preferably, the drilling step comprises drilling the bore along an axis which extends into the femoral neck and in the direction of the head of the femur. In one embodiment, the advancing a proximal anchor step comprises axially advancing the proximal anchor without rotating the proximal anchor with respect to the fixation device. The femoral fracture may be a femoral neck fracture (e.g., capital or subcapital), an intertrochanteric fracture or a subtrochanteric fracture.
• Further features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those of skill in the art in view of the detailed description of preferred embodiments which follows, when considered together with the attached drawings and claims.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
• FIG. 1 is a posterior elevational posterior cross section through the proximal portion of the femur, having two femoral neck fracture fixation devices positioned therein.
• FIG. 2 is a posterior cross section as inFIG. 1, with a modified fixation device positioned therein.
• FIG. 3A is a side elevational cross section of a fixation device similar to that ofFIG. 1.
• FIG. 3B is a side elevational cross section of a fixation device similar to that ofFIG. 2.
• FIG. 3C is a side elevational view of a double helix distal anchor.
• FIG. 3D is a side elevational view of a “V” thread distal anchor.
• FIG. 3E is a side elevational view of a buttress thread distal anchor
• FIG. 3F is a side elevational view of a triple helix distal anchor.
• FIG. 3G is a side elevational view of a split triple helix distal anchor.
• FIG. 3H is a side elevational view of a tapered transition thread distal anchor.
• FIG. 3I is a side elevational view of a tapered thread distal anchor.
• FIG. 4A is a front elevational perspective view of a modified fixation device of the present invention.
• FIG. 4B is a front elevational perspective view of a further modification to the fixation device of the present invention.
• FIG. 5 is an axial cross sectional view through a distal end of a fixation device of the present invention.
• FIG. 6 is a posterior cross section as inFIG. 1, with a fixation device and integral proximal plate anchor positioned therein.
• FIG. 6A is a cross sectional schematic view of a combination proximal anchor and plate in accordance with the present invention.
• FIG. 7A is a posterior cross section as inFIGS. 1, with a plate and fixation device positioned therein.
• FIG. 7B is a cross section through a proximal portion of the femur, illustrating the use of a fixation device in combination with a plate.
• FIG. 7C is a cross section as inFIG. 7B, illustrating the use of a fixation device of the present invention in combination with an intramedullary nail.
• FIG. 8 is a cross sectional view through an angularly adjustable proximal anchor plate.
• FIG. 9 is a front perspective view of the proximal anchor plate ofFIG. 8.
• FIG. 10 is an anterior view of the distal tibia and fibula, with fixation devices across lateral and medial malleolar fractures.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
• Although the fixation devices of the present invention will be disclosed primarily in the context of fractures of the proximal femur, the methods and structures disclosed herein are intended for application in any of a wide variety of bones and fractures, as will be apparent to those of skill in the art in view of the disclosure herein. For example, the bone fixation device of the present invention is applicable in a wide variety of fractures and osteotomies in the hand, such as interphalangeal and metacarpophalangeal arthrodesis, transverse phalangeal and metacarpal fracture fixation, spiral phalangeal and metacarpal fracture fixation, oblique phalangeal and metacarpal fracture fixation, intercondylar phalangeal and metacarpal fracture fixation, phalangeal and metacarpal osteotomy fixation as well as others known in the art. A wide variety of phalangeal and metatarsal osteotomies and fractures of the foot may also be stabilized using the bone fixation device of the present invention. These include, among others, distal metaphyseal osteotomies such as those described by Austin and Reverdin-Laird, base wedge osteotomies, oblique diaphyseal, digital arthrodesis as well as a wide variety of others that will be known to those of skill in the art. The bone fixation device may be used with or without plate(s) or washer(s), all of which can be either permanent, absorbable, or combinations.
• Fractures of the fibular and tibial malleoli, pilon fractures and other fractures of the bones of the leg may be fixated and stabilized with the present invention with or without the use of plates, both absorbable or non-absorbing types, and with alternate embodiments of the current invention. Fractures and osteotomies of the mid and hind foot, tarsal arthrodesis and osteotomy, or others as are known to those with skill in the art. One example is the fixation of the medial malleolar avulsion fragment fixation.
• The fixation device of the present invention may also be used to attach tissue or structure to the bone, such as in ligament reattachment and other soft tissue attachment procedures. Plates and washers, with or without tissue spikes for soft tissue attachment, and other implants may also be attached to bone, using either resorbable or nonresorbable fixation devices depending upon the implant and procedure. The fixation device may also be used to attach sutures to the bone, such as in any of a variety of tissue suspension procedures.
• For example, peripheral applications for the fixation devices include utilization of the device for fastening soft tissue such as capsule, tendon or ligament to bone. It may also be used to attach a synthetic material such as marlex mesh, to bone or allograft material such as tensor fascia lata, to bone. In the process of doing so, retention of the material to bone may be accomplished with the collar as shown, or the pin and or collar may be modified to accept a suture or other material for facilitation of this attachment.
• Specific examples include attachment of the posterior tibial tendon to the navicular bone in the Kidner operation. This application may be accomplished using an appropriately sized implant of the present invention along with a washer with distally extending soft tissue spikes. Navicular-cuneiform arthrodesis may be performed utilizing the device and concurrent attachment of the tendon may be accomplished. Attachment of the tendon may be accomplished in the absence of arthrodesis by altering the placement of the implant in the adjacent bone.
• Ligament or capsule reattachment after rupture, avulsion or detachment, such as in the ankle, shoulder or knee can also be accomplished using the devices disclosed herein.
• The fixation-devices can also be used to aid bone fusion between adjacent bones, bone fragments or any of a variety of articulating joints, such as, for example, a first and a second adjacent vertebral bodies of the spine.
• The fixation devices may be used in combination with semi tubular, one-third tubular and dynamic compression plates, both of metallic and absorbable composition, if the collar is modified to match the opening on the plate.
• The cannulated design disclosed below can be fashioned to accept an antibiotic impregnated rod for the slow adsorption of medication locally. This may be beneficial for prophylaxis, especially in open wounds, or when osteomyelitis is present and stabilization of fracture fragments is indicated.
• A kit may be assembled for field use by military or sport medical or paramedical personnel. This kit contains an implanting tool, and a variety of implant device size and types. The kit may include additional components such as sterilization or disinfectant materials, a skin stapler, bandages, gloves, and basic tools for emergent wound and fracture treatment. Antibiotic rods may be included for wound prophylaxis during transport.
• Referring toFIG. 1, there is illustrated a posterior side elevational view of the proximal portion of afemur10, having a twofixation devices12 positioned therein. The proximal end of thefemur10 comprises ahead14 connected by way of aneck16 to the long body orshaft17 of thefemur10. As illustrated inFIG. 1, theneck16 is smaller in diameter than thehead14. Theneck16 andhead14 also lie on an axis which, on average in humans, crosses the longitudinal axis of thebody17 of thefemur10 at an angle of about 126°. The risk of fracture at theneck16 is thus elevated, among other things, by the angular departure of theneck16 from the longitudinal axis of thebody17 offemur10 and also the reduced diameter of theneck16 with respect to thehead14.
• Thegreater trochanter18 extends outwardly above the junction of theneck16 and thebody17 of thefemur10. On the medial side of thegreater trochanter18 is thetrochanteric fossa20. This depression accommodates the insertion of the obturator externus muscle. Thelesser trochanter21 is located posteromedially at the junction of theneck16 and thebody17 of thefemur10. Both thegreater trochanter18 and thelesser trochanter21 serve for the attachment of muscles. On the posterior surface of thefemur10 at about the same axial level as thelesser trochanter21 is thegluteal tuberosity22, for the insertion of the gluteus maximus muscle. Additional details of the femur are well understood in the art and not discussed in further detail herein.
• FIG. 1 illustrates a subcapitalfemoral neck fracture24. Fractures of the proximal portion of thefemur10 are generally classified as capital or subcapital femoral neck fractures, intertrochanteric fractures and subtrochanteric fractures. All of these fractures will be deemed femoral neck fractures for the purpose of describing the present invention.
• Referring toFIGS. 1-4, thefixation device12 comprises abody28 extending between aproximal end30 and adistal end32. The length, diameter and construction materials of thebody28 can be varied, depending upon the intended clinical application. In embodiments optimized for various fractures in an adult humanpopulation, thebody28 will generally be within the range of from about 6 mm to about 150 mm in length after sizing, and within the range of from about 2 mm to about 12 mm in maximum diameter. The major diameter of the helical anchor, discussed below, may be within the range of from about 2.0 mm to about 15 mm. In general, the appropriate dimensions of thebody28 will vary, depending upon the specific fracture. In rough terms, for a malleolar fracture, shaft diameters in the range of from about 3 mm to about 4.5 mm may be used, and lengths within the range of from about 20 mm to about 70 mm. For condylar fractures, shaft diameters within the range of from about 3.5 mm to about 8.0 mm may be used with lengths within the range of from about 25 mm to about 70 mm. For colles fractures (distal radius and ulna), diameters within the range of from about 2.0 mm to about 4.5 mm may be used with any of a variety of lengths within the range of from about 6 mm to about 70 mm.
• In one embodiment, thebody28 comprises titanium. However, as will be described in more detail below, other metals or bioabsorbable or nonabsorbable polymeric materials may be utilized, depending upon the dimensions and desired structural integrity of the finishedfixation device12.
• Thedistal end32 of thebody28 is provided with a cancellous bone anchor or distalcortical bone anchor34. Additional details of the distal bone anchor are described below. In general, in a femoral neck application,distal bone anchor34 is adapted to be rotationally inserted into the cancellous bone within thehead14 of thefemur10, to retain thefixation device12 within the femoral head.
• Theproximal end30 of the fixation device is provided with aproximal anchor36.Proximal anchor36 is axially distally moveable along thebody28, to permit compression of thefracture24 as will be apparent fromFIG. 1 and the description below. As will be explained below, complementary locking structures such as threads or ratchet like structures between theproximal anchor36 and thebody28 resist proximal movement of theanchor36 with respect to thebody28 under normal use conditions. Theproximal anchor36 can be axially advanced along thebody28 either with or without rotation, depending upon the complementary locking structures as will be apparent from the disclosure herein.
• In the illustrated embodiment,proximal anchor36 comprises ahousing38 such as a tubular body, for coaxial movement along thebody28. Thehousing38 is provided with one ormore surface structures40 such as radially inwardly projecting teeth or flanges, for cooperating withcomplementary surface structures42 on thebody28. Thesurface structures40 andcomplementary surface structures42 permit distal axial travel of theproximal anchor36 with respect to thebody28, but resist proximal travel of theproximal anchor36 with respect to thebody28. Any of a variety of complementary surface structures which permit one way ratchet like movement may be utilized, such as a plurality of annular rings or helical threads, ramped ratchet structures and the like for cooperating with an opposing ramped structure or pawl.
• Retention structures42 are spaced axially apart along thebody28, between aproximal limit54 and adistal limit56. The axial distance betweenproximal limit54 anddistal limit56 is related to the desired axial working range of travel of theproximal anchor36, and thus the range of functional sizes of thefixation device12. In one embodiment of thefixation device12, theretention structure42 comprise a plurality of threads, adapted to cooperate with theretention structures40 on theproximal anchor36, which may be a complementary plurality of threads. In this embodiment, theproximal anchor36 may be distally advanced along thebody28 by rotation of theproximal anchor36 with respect to thebody28.Proximal anchor36 may be advantageously removed from thebody28 by reverse rotation, such as to permit removal of thebody28 from the patient. In this embodiment, aflange44 is preferably provided with a gripping structure to permit a removal tool to rotate theflange44 with respect to thebody28. Any of a variety of gripping structures may be provided, such as one or more slots, flats, bores or the like. In one embodiment, theflange44 is provided with a polygonal, and, in particular, a pentagonal or hexagonal circumference. See, e.g.FIG. 4A.
• FIGS. 4A and 4B additionally illustrate a profile modification that can be made on any of the embodiments discussed herein. Referring toFIG. 4A, theretention structures42 are positioned on areduced diameter segment31. The reduceddiameter segment31 is separated from the remainder of thebody28 by anannular shoulder29. This construction allows the outside diameter of thetubular housing38 to be approximately the same as the outside diameter of the distal portion ofbody28. In this manner, a single diameter bore hole may be formed in the proximal bone segment, to receive both thebody28 andtubular housing38 with minimal extra tolerance. Alternatively, as illustrated inFIG. 4B, thebody28 may have the same diameter throughout its axial length with theretention structures42 formed thereon. In this embodiment, the outside diameter ofproximal housing38 will be larger than the outside diameter throughout thebody28.
• Thus, the present invention provides a bone fixation device which can provide compression across a fracture throughout a range of motion following the placement of the distal anchor. The distal anchor may be positioned within the cancellous and/or distal cortical bone, and the proximal anchor may be distally advanced throughout a range to provide compression across the fracture without needing to relocate the distal anchor and without needing to initially locate the distal anchor in a precise position with respect to the proximal side of the bone. Providing a working range throughout which tensioning of the proximal anchor is independent from setting the distal anchor allows a single device to be useful for a wide variety of fractures, as well as eliminates the need for accurate device measurement and accurate placement of the distal anchor. In many applications, the working range is at least about 10% of the overall length of the device, and may be as much as 20% or 30% or more of the overall device length. In the context of a femoral application, working ranges of up to about 10 mm may be provided, since estimates within that range can normally be readily accomplished within the clinical setting. In other applications, such as a metatarsal fracture, a working range in the area of from about1 mm to about2 mm may be all that is necessary. The embodiments disclosed herein can be scaled to have a greater or a lesser working range, as will be apparent to those of skill in the art in view of the disclosure herein.
• Theproximal anchor36 includes aflange44 that seats against the outer surface of the femur or tissue adjacent the femur. Theflange44 is preferably an annular flange, to optimize the footprint or contact surface area between theflange44 and the femur. Circular or polygonal shaped flanges for use in femoral head fixation will generally have a diameter of at least about 4 mm greater than theadjacent body28 and often within the range of from about 4 mm to about 20 mm or more greater than theadjacent body28. In a modified embodiment, theflange44 can be curved to match the curved shape of the femur and further optimize the footprint or contact surface area between theflange44 and the femur.
• In the illustrated embodiment, thebone contacting surface46 of theflange44 resides in or approximately on a plane which is inclined with respect to the longitudinal axis of thebody28. Any of a variety of angular relationships between thebone contacting surface46 of theflange44 and the longitudinal axis of thebody28 andhousing38 may be utilized, depending upon the anticipated entrance angle of thebody28 and associated entrance point surface of thefemur10. In general, the longitudinal axis extending through thehead14 andneck16 of the human femur is inclined at an angle of approximately 126° from the longitudinal axis of thelong body17 of thefemur10. Angles between the longitudinal axis ofbody28 andtissue contacting surface46 within the range of from about 90° to about 140° will generally be utilized, often within the range of from about 100° to about 120°, for fixed angle fixation devices. Perpendicular flanges (i.e., 90°) are illustrated inFIGS. 3A and 3B.
• The clinician can be provided an array ofproximal anchors36 of varying angular relationships between thebone contacting surface46 and the longitudinal axis of thebody28 and housing38 (e.g., 90°, 100°, 110°, 120°, and 130°). Asingle body28 can be associated with the array such as in a single sterile package. The clinician upon identifying the entrance angle of thebody28 and the associated entrance point surface orientation of thefemur10 can choose theanchor36 from the array with the best fit angular relationship, for use with thebody28.
• In accordance with an optional feature, illustrated inFIGS. 8 and 9, theflange44 is angularly adjustable with respect to the longitudinal axis of thebody28. More specifically, in this embodiment, thetubular housing38 is a separate component from theflange44. Thehousing38 and theflange44 preferably include corresponding semi-spherical or radiusedsurfaces45a,and45b.Thesurface45bsurrounds anaperture49 in theflange44. This arrangement allows thehousing38 to extend through and pivot with respect to theflange44. As such, the angular relationship between thebone contacting surface46 of theflange44 and the longitudinal axis of thebody28 can vary in response to the entrance angle.
• As an independent feature inFIGS. 8 and 9, theflange44 is enlarged and includes one or two ormore openings47 for receiving one or two or more femoral shaft screws (not shown). Theflange44 may be elongated anatomically distally parallel to the axis of the femur, so that it functions simultaneously as a plate, as will be discussed in connection withFIG. 6.
• With reference back toFIGS. 3aand3b,theproximal end30 of thebody28 is preferably additionally provided withrotational coupling48, for allowing thebody28 to be rotationally coupled to a driving device. Any of a variety of driving devices may be utilized, such as electric drills or hand tools which allow the clinician to manually rotate thecancellous bone anchor34 into the head of the femur. Thus, therotational coupling48 may have any of a variety of cross sectional configurations, such as one or more flats or splines.
• In one embodiment, therotational coupling48 comprises a proximal projection of thebody28 having a polygonal cross section, such as a hexagonal cross section. Therotational coupling48 is illustrated as a male component, machined or milled or attached to theproximal end30 of thebody28. However, the rotational coupling may also be in the form of a female element, such as a hexagonal or other noncircular cross sectioned lumen extending throughout a proximal portion or the entire length of thebody28. Although illustrated as solid throughout, thebody28 may be cannulated to accommodate installation over a placement wire as is understood in the art. The cross section of the central cannulation can be made non circular, e.g., hexagonal, to accommodate a corresponding male tool for installation or removal of the device regardless of the location of the proximal break point, as will be discussed.
• Thebody28 may be provided with at least one and preferably two or three ormore break points50 spaced axially apart along the proximal portion of thebody28. Break points50 comprise a weakened transverse plane through thebody28, which facilitate severing of the proximal portion of thebody28 following proper tensioning of theproximal anchor36.Break point50 may be constructed in any of a variety of ways, such as by machining or milling an annular recess into the exterior wall of thebody28, or created one or more transverse perforations through thebody28 such as by mechanical, laser, or EDM drilling.
• Thebody28 may also be provided with at least one and preferably two or three or moregraduation markings axially spaced along the proximal portion of thebody28. Such graduation markings can be used to indicate how far thebody28 has been inserted into the bone. Such graduation markings may include indicia indicating the distance (e.g., in millimeters or inches) from the proximal surface of the bone to the distal tip of thedistal bone anchor34.
• In all of the embodiments illustrated herein, thedistal anchor34 comprises ahelical locking structure60 for engaging cancellous and/or distal cortical bone. In the illustrated embodiment, the lockingstructure60 comprises a flange that is be wrapped around acentral core62 or an axial lumen, as discussed below. Thecentral core62 or axial lumen defines a minor diameter of thehelical locking structure60. In a similar manner, the outer edge of thehelical flange60 defines a major diameter or outer boundary of thehelical locking structure60. The flange extends through at least one and generally from about two to about 50 or more full revolutions depending upon the axial length of the distal anchor and intended application. For most femoral neck fixation devices, the flange will generally complete from about 2 to about 20 revolutions. Thehelical flange60 is preferably provided with a pitch and an axial spacing to optimize the retention force within cancellous bone, to optimize compression of the fracture.
• Thehelical flange60 of the embodiment illustrated inFIG. 1 is shaped generally like a flat blade or radially extended screw thread. However, it should be appreciated that thehelical flange60 can have any of a variety of cross sectional shapes, such as rectangular, triangular or other as deemed desirable for a particular application through routine experimentation in view of the disclosure herein. The ratio of the major diameter to the minor diameter can be optimized with respect to the desired retention force within the cancellous bone and giving due consideration to the structural integrity and strength of thedistal anchor34. Another aspect of thedistal anchor34 that can be optimized is the shape of the major and minor diameters, which in the illustrated embodiment are generally cylindrical with a tapereddistal end32.
• Thedistal end32 and/or the outer edges of thehelical flange60 may be atraumatic (e.g., blunt or soft). This inhibits the tendency of thefixation device12 to migrate anatomically proximally towards the hip joint bearing surface after implantation (i.e., femoral head cut-out). Distal migration is also inhibited by the dimensions and presence of theproximal anchor36, which has a larger footprint than conventional screws.
• Referring toFIGS. 2 and 3B, a variation of thedistal anchor34 is illustrated. Thedistal anchor34 comprises an elongatedhelical locking structure60 that is spirally wrapped about an axial lumen through at least one and preferably from about two to about20 or more full revolutions. The axial lumen defines a minor diameter that is generally cylindrical. As with the previous embodiment, theelongated body60 is provided with a pitch and an axial spacing to optimize the retention force within cancellous bone, which optimizes compression of the fracture. Thetip72 of theelongated body60 may be pointed. Although not illustrated, this variation is particularly suited for acanulated fixation device12. That is, a design wherein a central lumen extends through thebody28 and thedistal anchor34.
• FIG. 5 is an axial cross sectional view through a distal anchor of the type illustrated inFIGS. 2 and 3B.FIG. 5 also illustrates the cross-section of the helical flange which forms the spiral locking structure. The cross-section has a width w, and a height h. Through routine experimentation, the shape, the width w and height h of the elongated body can be varied to optimize the retention force within cancellous bone. When w is approximately equal to h, the cross section can be circular, square or faceted. In general, w and h are within the range of from about 1 mm to about 8 mm for use in the femoral neck application.
• With reference toFIG. 3C, another variation of thedistal anchor34 is illustrated. In this arrangement, thedistal anchor34 forms a double helix comprising twoelongated structures360,362 spirally wrapped around an axial lumen through at least one and preferably from about 2 to about 20 or more full revolutions. As with the previous embodiments, the shape, the width w and height h of theelongated bodies360,362 along with pitch and an axial spacing can be optimized through routine experimentation to optimize the retention force within cancellous bone, which optimizes compression of the fracture. The diameter of the axial lumen can also be optimized. Thetip364 ofhelical flanges360,362 may be tapered or pointed to permit easier insertion through self-tapping and self-drilling. The double helix design may be incorporated into any of the designs disclosed elsewhere herein. In one embodiment for use in the femoral neck, theelongated structures360,362 have a generally rectangular cross sectional shape with a height and width within the range of about 1.0-4.0 millimeters. In such an embodiment, the major diameter is in the range of about 4.0-15 millimeters, the minor diameter is in the range of about 2.0-8.0 millimeters, and the pitch is in the range of from about 3 to about 12 threads per inch.
• With reference toFIG. 3D, yet another variation of thedistal anchor34 is illustrated. In this embodiment, theanchor34 comprises ahelical flange370 having a generally “V” shaped cross-section. The illustratedflange370 has sides angled at about 60-degrees, forming twoload bearing surfaces372,374 and a bluntedouter edge376. Theproximally facing surface372 carries the axial load to resist pullout. In this embodiment of thehelical flange370, the minor diameter is approximately equal to zero. Such an arrangement advantageously leaves more bone in place when thedistal anchor34 is inserted into the distal bone fragment such as a portion of thefemur10. However, it should be appreciated that in a modified arrangement the minor diameter can be increased giving due consideration to the balance between the desired retention force within the cancellous bone and the structural integrity and strength of thedistal anchor34. The angle between the twosurfaces372,374 along with the pitch and axial spacing of thehelical flange370 are selected to optimize the retention force within cancellous bone, to optimize compression of the fracture.
• Still yet another variation of thedistal anchor34 is illustrated inFIG. 3E. In this variation, thedistal anchor34 comprises ahelical flange380 having a buttress thread design. That is, theflange380 has a generally rectangular cross-section, and extends radially outwardly and in some embodiments is inclined proximally to form a proximally concave spiral. This arrangement enhances the pullout strength of thedistal anchor34 because the bearing surfaces382,384 of theflange380 lie generally perpendicular to the load direction. As with the previous arrangement, thehelical flange380 has a minor diameter that is approximately equal to zero. However, it should be appreciated that in a modified arrangement the minor diameter can be increased minor diameter can increased giving due consideration to the balance between the desired retention force within the cancellous bone and the structural integrity and strength of thedistal anchor34. As with the previous embodiments, the pitch and axial spacing can also be optimized to enhance the retention force within cancellous bone and to optimize compression across the fracture.
• Referring toFIGS. 3F and 3G, additional variations ofdistal anchor34 are illustrated. With initial reference toFIG. 3F, thedistal anchor34 comprises at least three helical threads orflanges390,392,394 spirally wrapped around a generally cylindricalcentral core395, which in the illustrated arrangement also defines the wall of anaxial lumen397 that can extend through thebody28. The major diameter of thedistal anchor34 is generally cylindrical. The leadingtips396 of thehelical flanges390,392,394 may be sharpened so as to aid the screw in being self tapping and/or self drilling. In this arrangement, thehelical flanges390,392,394 can be provided with a lower pitch as compared to the arrangement described above. Moreover, as compared to the previous arrangements, this arrangement requires less turns to insert thedistal anchor34 any given axial distance.
• For example, in an embodiment for use in the femoral neck, the pitch of thehelical flanges390,392,394 may be within the range of from about 2to about 12 threads per inch. Thedistal anchor34 therefore requires fewer turns during insertion to achieve the same axial travel as a single helix thread having a greater pitch. In addition, this arrangement leaves more of the bone intact. In a modified arrangement, the distal anchor can include two or four helical flanges such asflanges390,392,394. The number, pitch and axial spacing of the helical flanges can be optimized through routine experimentation in light of the disclosure herein. In one dual helical flange embodiment, the minor diameter is about 4.5 millimeters, the major diameter is about 7.0 millimeters and the pitch is about 5.5 threads per inch.
• InFIG. 3G, thedistal anchor34 comprises split triple helix distal anchor design that is similar to the arrangement described above. However, in this arrangement, one of the helical flanges is cut through to theaxial lumen397 that is defined by thecentral core395. As such, threeflanges400,402,403 remain wrapped around thecentral core395. As compared to the previous arrangement, this arrangement leaves more bone intact. As with the previous embodiments, the pitch and axial spacing can be optimized through routine experimentation. A split double helix, with two flanges or threads may also be provided.
• FIGS. 3H and 3I illustrate more variations of thedistal anchor34. InFIG. 3H, thedistal anchor34 comprises a generally V-shapedflange410 that is wrapped around acentral core412 that also defines acentral lumen413, which can extend through thebody28. The major diameter of the V-shapedflange410 is generally cylindrical. In contrast, the minor diameter of the central core tapers in the distal direction. As such, in the illustrated arrangement, the central core disappears into the generally cylindricalcentral lumen413 at a point in between the proximal and distal ends of the threads, and, in the illustrated embodiment, at approximately the longitudinal center414 of thedistal anchor34. This arrangement strengthens theproximal portion416 of thedistal anchor34, where stretching and fatigue may be most likely to occur on pullout. It is anticipated that the shape of theflange410 along with the pitch, axial spacing and the taper of the central core can be optimized through routine experimentation given the disclosure herein.
• InFIG. 3I, thedistal anchor34 also comprises a V-shapedhelical flange420 that is wrapped around an axial lumen. In this arrangement, both the major and minor diameters taper from theproximal end422 of theanchor34 to thedistal end424. At thedistal end424, the minor diameter is approximately equal to zero. In this arrangement, thedistal end424 of tapereddistal anchor34 can provide for self tapping while theproximal end422 of theanchor34 provides for self drilling. As with the previous embodiments, the shape, pitch, axial spacing of the helical flange430 and the taper of the major and minor diameters can be further optimized through routine experimentation. In a modified arrangement, the helical flange430 can be wrapped around a central core that tapers from theproximal end422 to thedistal end424.
• In any of the embodiments herein, an anti-rotation lock may be provided between the distal anchor and the proximal collar or plate, such as a spline or other interfit structure to prevent relative rotation of the proximal and distal ends of the device following implantation.
• In use, the clinician first identifies a patient having a fracture to be treated, such as a femoral neck fracture, which is fixable by an internal fixation device. The clinician accesses the proximal femur, reduces the fracture if necessary and selects a bone drill and drills ahole80 in accordance with conventional techniques. In the example of a femoral neck fracture, three holes and fixation devices will often be used as has been discussed. Preferably, thehole80 has a diameter within the range from about 3 mm to about 8 mm. This diameter may be slightly larger than the diameter of thedistal anchor34. Thehole80 preferably extends up to or slightly beyond thefracture24.
• Afixation device12 having an axial length and outside diameter suitable for thehole80 is selected. Thedistal end32 of thefixation device12 is advanced distally into thehole80 until thedistal anchor34 reaches the distal end of thehole80. Theproximal anchor36 may be carried by thefixation device12 prior to advancing thebody28 into thehole80, or may be attached following placement of thebody28 within thehole80. Once thebody28 is in place, the clinician may use any of a variety of driving devices, such as electric drills or hand tools to rotate thecancellous bone anchor34 into the head of the femur.
• While proximal traction is applied to theproximal end30 ofbody28, such as by conventional hemostats, pliers or a calibrated loading device, theproximal anchor36 is advanced distally until theanchor36 fits snugly against the outer surface of the femur or tissue adjacent the femur. Appropriate compression of thefixation device12 across the fracture is accomplished by tactile feedback or through the use of a calibration device for applying a predetermined load on the implantation device. One advantage of the structure of the present invention is the ability to adjust compression independently of the setting of thedistal anchor34.
• Following appropriate tensioning of theproximal anchor36, theproximal extension30 of thebody28 is preferably cut off, snapped off, unscrewed or otherwise removed.Body28 may be cut using conventional saws, cutters or bone forceps which are routinely available in the clinical setting. Alternatively, the fixation device can be selected such that it is sized to length upon tensioning, so that no proximal projection remains.
• Following removal of theproximal end30 ofbody28, the access site may be closed and dressed in accordance with conventional wound closure techniques.
• With reference toFIG. 2, in one arrangement, theproximal anchor36 can include one ormore barbs41 extending radially outwardly from thetubular housing28. Thebarbs41 may be radially symmetrically distributed about the longitudinal axis of thetubular housing38. Eachbarb41 is provided with atransverse engagement surface43, for anchoring theproximal anchor36 in the bone. Thetransverse engagement surface43 may lie on a plane which is transverse to the longitudinal axis of thetubular housing38 or may be inclined with respect to the longitudinal axis of thetubular housing38. In either arrangement, thetransverse engagement surface43 generally faces thebone contacting surface46 of theflange44. As such, thetransverse engagement surface43 inhibits proximal movement of theproximal anchor36 with respect to the bone.
• Thebarbs41 allow the bone fixation device to capture “secondary compression” of the fracture. As explained above, the bone fixation device can be used to provide an initial compression across the fracture when theproximal anchor36 is appropriately tensioned. However, as the patient applies weight or stress to the bone post procedure, the fracture typically undergoes secondary compression, which further compresses the fracture. During such secondary compression, thebarbs41 prevent proximal movement of theproximal anchor36 with respect to the bone. The ratchet-type structures40,42 of theproximal anchor36 and thebody28 allow theproximal anchor36 to move distally along thebody28. Thus, any slack caused by the secondary compression is taken up by theproximal anchor36 as theretention structures40,42 prevent proximal movement of theproximal anchor36 with respect to thebody29. This device is therefore self tightening after it has been implanted in the patient.
• Preferably, the clinician will have access to an array offixation devices12, having, for example, different diameters, axial lengths and angular relationships. These may be packaged one per package in sterile envelopes or peelable pouches, or in dispensing cartridges which may each hold a plurality ofdevices12. Upon encountering a fracture for which the use of a fixation device is deemed appropriate, the clinician will assess the dimensions and load requirements, and select a fixation device from the array which meets the desired specifications.
• In some types of fractures such as a femoral neck fracture, a clinician may want to introduce two or three ormore fixation devices12 into thefemoral head14 to secure thefracture24. This may be desirable if the clinician determines that, based upon the nature of thefracture24, there is a possibility that thehead14 of thefemur10 could rotate about asingle fixation device12. Even minor rotation can inhibit the healing of the fracture. Significant rotation can result in failure of the fixation device or necrosis of the femoral head. Twofixation devices12 may also be desirable where the direction of the fracture is generally parallel to the axis of implantation as is understood in the art.
• Referring toFIG. 6, there is disclosed a variation of theproximal anchor36 in which theproximal anchor36 is integrally formed with or attached to a plate. Thefixation device12 inFIG. 6 may otherwise be identical to the embodiments previously discussed. Theproximal anchor90 comprises anelongated flange92, which extends from thehousing93 longitudinally down (anatomically caudad or distally) thebody17 of thefemur10. Theelongated flange92 preferably includes, one ormore openings94 for receiving one or more femoral shaft screws96. Theflange92 may or may not extend above (anatomically proximal to) thehousing93. Elimination of a proximal flange may more easily permit rotational removal of theproximal anchor36 from thebody28 by reverse rotation in an inclined flange embodiment.
• Referring toFIG. 6A, there is illustrated a cross sectional schematic view of an integralproximal anchor36 and proximal plate. The dimensions and orientation of theproximal anchor36 may be varied widely, depending upon the intended application. For example, a longitudinal axis of thehousing93 may be inclined or perpendicular with respect to the plane offlange92. Theflange92 may have any of a variety of dimensions and profiles, depending upon the intended application. Lengths of theplate92 in the vertical direction as illustrated onFIG. 6A, for use in femoral neck fixation fractures, may range from at least about0.5 inches to about10 inches or more. Theplate92 may be planar as illustrated, particularly in small plate embodiments, or may be curved or contoured to improve seating of theplate92 against the adjacent bone.Plate92 may be provided with one or more apertures for receiving bone screws or other fixation devices as illustrated inFIGS. 6 and 7A.
• Referring toFIG. 7A, thefixation device12 is schematically illustrated in combination with aconventional plate100. Thefixation device12 inFIG. 7A may be identical to the embodiments described elsewhere herein. Thefixation device12 is used with an elongated side support orplate100, which extends longitudinally above and below thehole80. Theelongated side plate100 includes anopening102 that preferably has a diameter that is slightly larger than the diameter of thehousing38. Theelongated side plate100 preferably also includes one ormore openings104 for receiving one or more femoral shaft screws106. Advantageously, theelongated side plate100 spreads the forces exerted by theflange44 across a larger area of-thefemur17, and affects the distribution of load. In an alternate embodiment, the elongated side plate can100 include one or more openings above thehousing38 for receiving trochanteric anchor screws (not shown).
• A contouredside plate100 is illustrated inFIG. 7B. Theproximal anchor36 is also formed with a tapered (e.g. conical or concave outwardly) bone or plate contacting surface onflange44.
• Thefixation device12 of the present invention may also be used in combination with intramedullary nails orrods101 as schematically illustrated inFIG. 7C, as will be understood by those of skill in the art.
• Thefixation device12 of the present invention may be used in any of a wide variety of anatomical settings beside the proximal femur, as has been discussed. For example, lateral and medial malleolar fractures can be readily fixed using the device of the present invention. Referring toFIG. 10, there is illustrated an anterior view of thedistal fibula120 andtibia122. Thefibula120 terminates distally in thelateral malleolus124, and thetibia122 terminates distally in themedial malleolus126.
• Afixation device12 in accordance with the present invention is illustrated as extending through thelateral malleolus124 across the lateralmalleolar fracture128 and into thefibula120.Fixation device12 includes adistal anchor34 for fixation within thefibula120, anelongate body28 and aproximal anchor36 as has been discussed.
• FIG. 10 also illustrates afixation device12 extending through themedial malleolus126, across a medialmalleolar fracture130, and into thetibia122. AlthoughFIG. 10 illustrates fixation of both a lateralmalleolar fracture128 and medialmalleolar fracture130, either fracture can occur without the other as is well understood in the art. Installation of the fixation devices across malleolar fractures is accomplished utilizing the same basic steps discussed above in connection with the fixation of femoral neck fractures.
• The fixation devices of the present invention may be made from either conventional bioabsorbable materials or conventional non-absorbable materials, combinations thereof and equivalents thereof. In addition, natural materials such as allografts may be used. Examples of absorbable materials include homopolymers and copolymers of lactide, glycolide, trimethylene carbonate, caprolactone, and p-dioxanone and blends thereof. The following two blends may be useful:
• (1) the blend of poly(p-dioxanone) and a lactide/glycolide copolymer, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,646,741 which is incorporated by reference.
• (2) the glycolide-rich blend of two or more polymers, one polymer being a high lactide content polymer, and the other being a high glycolide content disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,889,119 which is incorporated by reference.
• Additional bioabsorbable materials are disclosed in copending application serial No. 09/558,057 filed Apr. 26, 2000, the disclosure of which is incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.
• The fixation devices may also be made from conventional non-absorbable, biocompatible materials including stainless steel, titanium, alloys thereof, polymers, composites and the like and equivalents thereof. In one embodiment, the distal anchor comprises a metal helix, while the body and the proximal anchor comprise a bioabsorbable material. Alternatively, the distal anchor comprises a bioabsorbable material, and the body and proximal anchor comprise either a bioabsorbable material or a non-absorbable material. As a further alternative, each of the distal anchor and the body comprise a non-absorbable material, connected by an absorbable link. This may be accomplished by providing a concentric fit between the distal anchor and the body, with a transverse absorbable pin extending therethrough. This embodiment will enable removal of the body following dissipation of the pin, while leaving the distal anchor within the bone.
• The components of the invention (or a polymeric coating layer on part or all of the anchor surface), may contain one or more bioactive substances, such as antibiotics, chemotherapeutic substances, angiogenic growth factors, substances for accelerating the healing of the wound, growth hormones, antithrombogenic agents, bone growth accelerators or agents, and the like. Such bioactive implants may be desirable because they contribute to the healing of the injury in addition to providing mechanical support.
• In addition, the components may be provided with any of a variety of structural modifications to accomplish various objectives, such as osteoincorporation, or more rapid or uniform absorption into the body. For example, osteoincorporation may be enhanced by providing a micropitted or otherwise textured surface on the components. Alternatively, capillary pathways may be provided throughout the body and collar, such as by manufacturing the anchor and body from an open cell foam material, which produces tortuous pathways through the device. This construction increases the surface area of the device which is exposed to body fluids, thereby generally increasing the absorption rate in a bioabsorbable construction. Capillary pathways may alternatively be provided by laser drilling or other technique, which will be understood by those of skill in the art in view of the disclosure herein. In general, the extent to which the anchor can be permeated by capillary pathways or open cell foam passageways may be determined by balancing the desired structural integrity of the device with the desired reabsorption time, taking into account the particular strength and absorption characteristics of the desired polymer.
• One open cell bioabsorbable material is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,005,161 as a poly(hydroxy) acid in the form of an interconnecting, open-cell meshwork which duplicates the architecture of human cancellous bone from the iliac crest and possesses physical property (strength) values in excess of those demonstrated by human (mammalian) iliac crest cancellous bone. The gross structure is said to maintain physical property values at least equal to those of human, iliac crest, cancellous bone for a minimum of 90 days following implantation. The disclosure of U.S. Pat. No. 6,005,161 is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein.
• The components of the present invention may be sterilized by any of the well known sterilization techniques, depending on the type of material. Suitable sterilization techniques include heat sterilization, radiation sterilization, such ascobalt 60 irradiation or electron beams, ethylene oxide sterilization, and the like.
• The specific dimensions of any of the bone fixation devices of the present invention can be readily varied depending upon the intended application, as will be apparent to those of skill in the art in view of the disclosure herein. Moreover, although the present invention has been described in terms of certain preferred embodiments, other embodiments of the invention including variations in dimensions, configuration and materials will be apparent to those of skill in the art in view of the disclosure herein. In addition, all features discussed in connection with any one embodiment herein can be readily adapted for use in other embodiments herein. The use of different terms or reference numerals for similar features in different embodiments does not imply differences other than those which may be expressly set forth. Accordingly, the present invention is intended to be described solely by reference to the appended claims, and not limited to the preferred embodiments disclosed herein.

Claims (14)

1-52. (canceled)

53. A method of aiding bone fusion between first and second vertebral bodies of the spine, comprising the steps of:

advancing a fixation device through the first vertebral body in the direction of the second vertebral body;

rotating at least a distal anchor of the fixation device to secure the fixation device to the second vertebral body; and

axially advancing a proximal anchor distally along the fixation device to engage the first vertebral body.

54. A method of aiding bone fusion as inclaim 53, wherein the first and second vertebral bodies of the spine are adjacent to each other.

55. A method of aiding bone fusion as inclaim 53, wherein the axially advancing step comprises rotating the proximal anchor about a longitudinal axis of the fixation device.

56. A method of aiding bone fusion as inclaim 53, wherein the axially advancing step comprises advancing the proximal anchor distally along the fixation device without rotation.

57. A method of aiding bone fusion as inclaim 53, wherein the advancing a proximal anchor step comprises advancing a tubular sleeve distally along the fixation device.

58. A method of aiding bone fusion as inclaim 53, comprising drilling a bore through the first vertebral body fragment and into the second vertebral body and advancing the fixation device through the bore.

59. A method of aiding bone fusion as inclaim 58, wherein the drilling a bore step comprises drilling a bore having a diameter which is slightly larger than the diameter of the distal anchor.

60. A method of aiding bone fusion as inclaim 53, wherein the proximal anchor is carried by the fixation device prior to the advancing a fixation device step.

61. A method of aiding bone fusion as inclaim 53, wherein the advancing a proximal anchor distally along the fixation device step comprises anchoring an engagement surface on the proximal anchor into the first vertebral body.

62. A method of aiding bone fusion as inclaim 53, wherein the proximal anchor comprises a bone contacting surface which resides on a plane which is inclined at an angle within the range of from about 90 degrees to about 140 degrees with respect to the longitudinal axis of the fixation device.

63. A method of aiding bone fusion as inclaim 62, wherein the angle is about 90 degrees.

64. A method of aiding bone fusion as inclaim 62, wherein the angle is adjustable.

65. A method of aiding bone fusion as inclaim 62, comprising adjusting the angle between the bone contacting surface and the longitudinal axis of the fixation device.

Images