FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM[0001] The present invention was developed with support from the U.S. government under Contract No. DE-AC04-01AL66850 with the U.S. Department of Energy. Accordingly, the U.S. government has certain rights in the present invention.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION1. Field of the Invention[0002]
The present invention relates broadly to friction liners and other mechanisms for enhancing a transfer of energy, in the form of, for example, torque and momentum, between a stator or other driver component and a rotor or other movable component. More particularly, the present invention concerns a micro-beam friction liner comprising a dense array of micro-beam projections having first ends substantially fixed relative to a rotor and second ends projecting substantially toward a plurality of teeth of a stator, wherein the micro-beam projections compress and bend to store energy during movement of the stator teeth and then react against the stator teeth to convert the stored energy to rotational energy in the rotor.[0003]
2. Description of the Prior Art[0004]
Generally, a piezoelectric material expands and contracts when an alternating voltage is applied across two opposing surfaces. In a rotary embodiment, a piezoelectric motor comprises a stator and a rotor, with the stator having a plurality of teeth that, due to a traveling wave developed in the stator by piezoelectric action, drives the rotor using elliptic motion of the stator teeth to transfer torque and momentum. Commonly, a friction liner is bonded to the rotor and the rotor and the friction liner are spring-loaded against the stator in order to maximize the transfer of torque and momentum therebetween.[0005]
Unfortunately, prior art friction liners are constructed of such materials as hard metals or metal oxides or soft organic polymers, and often experience slippage resulting in significant energy loss and reduced torque transfer. Furthermore, because the tangential velocity of each stator tooth varies at each point on its elliptical path, and because the rotor's velocity can be considered constant during one traversal of the ellipse, the tangential velocity of each stator tooth can only match the rotor velocity at one or two points along the elliptical path. Thus, the majority of contact between the stator tooth and the rotor or the friction liner involves slippage. Additionally, prior art friction liners typically have low Q, or little dynamic action. Such dynamic reaction force/impulse is thought to be one of the mechanisms whereby torque is transferred between the stator and the rotor.[0006]
Due to the above-identified and other problems and disadvantages in the art, a need exists for an improved friction liner.[0007]
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONThe present invention overcomes the above-described and other problems and disadvantages in the prior art with a micro-beam friction liner adapted to increase performance and efficiency and reduce wear in a piezoelectric motor or actuator or other device involving a transfer of energy in the form of, for example, torque and momentum. The micro-beam friction liner of the present invention can be incorporated, for example, into an otherwise substantially conventional piezoelectric motor having a stator and a rotor, with the stator including a plurality of teeth. A traveling wave generated in the stator causes each stator tooth to execute a circular or elliptical motion which is to be transferred to the rotor.[0008]
In a preferred embodiment, the micro-beam friction liner of the present invention is bonded to or otherwise coupled with the rotor, so as to be interposed between the rotor and the stator teeth. The micro-beam friction liner broadly comprises a dense plurality or array of micro-beam projections, each having a first end fixed relative to the rotor and a second end projecting therefrom substantially toward the stator teeth.[0009]
In operation, the second ends of some or all of the plurality of micro-beam projections make contact with the stator teeth moving relative to the rotor during an elliptic traversal. As each stator tooth moves up and tangentially ahead of the rotor, a number of the micro-beam projections contact the stator tooth and are compressed and bent in the direction of rotation. As the stator tooth completes the elliptic path traversal, the micro-beam projections react against the stator tooth to convert energy stored in compression and bending to rotational energy in the rotor.[0010]
It will be appreciated that the concept of the micro-beam friction liner can also be expressed as a method of facilitating a transfer of momentum and torque from the stator to the rotor. First the traveling wave is generated through piezoelectric action, with the wave having a certain energy. This energy is then transferred to the micro-beam projections and stored in the form of compression and bending. Lastly, the micro-beam projections react against the stator teeth as they decompress and unbend and thereby transfer the stored energy to the rotor.[0011]
Thus, it will be appreciated that the micro-beam friction liner of the present invention provides a number of substantial advantages over the prior art, including, for example, increased performance and efficiency through improved torque transfer, and reduced wear through decreased slippage. Furthermore, the micro-beam friction liner allows for replacement of organic and polymer friction materials used in prior art friction liners with inorganic materials, primarily metals, to further increase friction and wearability. Additionally, the micro-beam friction liner has a high Q, or increased reaction forces, which is believed to play an important role in transferring torque and momentum.[0012]
These and other important features of the present invention are more fully described in the section titled DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT, below.[0013]
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGSA preferred embodiment of the present invention is described in detail below with reference to the attached drawing figures, wherein:[0014]
FIG. 1 is an exploded view of a piezoelectric motor incorporating a preferred embodiment of the micro-beam friction liner of the present invention;[0015]
FIG. 2 is a fractional magnified view of a surface of the micro-beam friction liner of FIG. 1 showing a plurality of micro-beam projections; and[0016]
FIG. 3 is a block diagram of preferred steps in the operation of the micro-beam friction liner of FIG. 1.[0017]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENTReferring to FIG. 1, a[0018]micro-beam friction liner10 is shown constructed in accordance with a preferred first embodiment of the present invention. Themicro-beam friction liner10 is adapted to increase performance and efficiency and reduce wear in apiezoelectric motor12 or actuator or other device involving a transfer of energy, in the form of, for example, torque and momentum, between astator14 or other driver component and arotor16 or other movable component.
As illustrated, the[0019]piezoelectric motor12 is substantially conventional in both form and function, and includes theaforementioned stator14 androtor16. Thestator14 includes a piezoelectricceramic element18 bonded to ametal ring20, with themetal ring20 having a plurality of projectingteeth22. Therotor16 may be spring-loaded to enhance contact with thestator14. Broadly, thepiezoelectric element18 expands and contracts when an alternating voltage is applied across two opposing surfaces. A thin metal electrode is deposited on thepiezoelectric element18 in sections, and each such section is conditioned (poled) such that when the alternating voltage is applied across the entirepiezoelectric element18, one section will expand or contract while adjacent sections correspondingly contract or expand. This results in alternating expansions and contractions that give rise to two standing waves that combine to form a traveling wave. As the wave travels through thestator14, eachstator tooth22 executes a circular or elliptical motion. It is desirable to transfer to therotor16 as much as possible of the energy associated with this circular or elliptical motion. When the applied alternating voltage is at the natural resonant frequency of themetal ring20, which is typically approximately between 30 kHz and 120 kHz, the elliptical motion movements will be approximately between 50 micro-inches and 400 micro-inches.
In a preferred embodiment, referring also to FIG. 2, the[0020]micro-beam friction liner10 of the present invention is interposed between therotor16 and thestator teeth22 to enhance the transfer of energy therebetween. Themicro-beam friction liner10 may be fabricated using polymer materials, including, for example, Teflon, PTFE, PBT, PEEK, and PPS, and may be fiber-reinforced as necessary or desirable. Furthermore, themicro-beam friction liner10 may be fabricated as a discrete component and then coupled with therotor16, such as, for example, by chemical bonding or mechanical fastening, or may be fabricated directly on therotor16, such as, for example, by application thereto as a liquid coating.
The[0021]micro-beam friction liner10 broadly comprises a dense plurality or array ofmicro-beam projections24, each having afirst end26 substantially fixed relative to therotor16 and a second end28 projecting therefrom substantially toward thestator teeth22. The second end28 may be coated with an appropriate friction-enhancing material, such as, for example, a metal oxide (e.g., TiN, Al2O3, NiP, alumite) or a polymer. Such coating may be accomplished using any suitable process, including, for example, sputtering or plasma spraying.
Design considerations for the[0022]micro-beam projections24 include various material properties, such as, for example, modulus of elasticity and density; physical dimensions and cross-section geometry; stiffness; spacing; number per unit area or ratio to stator tooth area; and array pattern. These considerations may be greatly dependent on application and use. In an 8 mm piezoelectric motor, for example, themicro-beam projections24 can be fabricated using a LiGA process to have a cross-section of 0.001 inch by 0.0026 inch, a length of 0.0065 inch, and a spacing of 0.001 inch. This results in approximately thirty-six of themicro-beam projections24 contacting astator tooth22 during a contact event. Regardless, however, of the actual design parameters used, it may be preferable that thestator teeth22 contact an approximately equal number of themicro-beam projections24 during each contact event so as to avoid a variable torque output.
Another important design consideration is the angle at which the[0023]micro-beam projections24 project toward thestator14. In a bi-directional motor, the angle of projection is preferably approximately 90° so as to accommodate traveling waves from both forward and reverse directions. In a uni-directional motor, however, wherein the traveling waves move in only one direction, performance may be improved with an angle of projection that is greater or less than 90° in the direction of the traveling waves.
Another important design consideration is resonant frequency. If the resonant frequency of the[0024]micro-beam projections24 is large compared to the stator drive frequency, then themicro-beam projections24 will respond without lag to movement of thestator teeth22 and will return to their rest positions prior to the next elliptic traversal. If, however, the resonant frequency of themicro-beam projections24 is adjusted to synchronize their movements with that of thestator teeth22, then themicro-beam projections24 will be optimally positioned for the next elliptic traversal.
Techniques for fabricating the[0025]micro-beam projections24 may depend on the size of thepiezoelectric motor12 into which themicro-beam friction liner10 is to be incorporated. In large piezoelectric motors, themicro-beam projections24 may be manufactured using traditional machining methods, such as, for example, mechanical milling, chemical milling/etching, or electrical discharge machining (EDM). In extremely small piezoelectric motors, themicro-beam projections24 may be manufactured using LiGA or MEMS-type photolithographic processing and micro-EDM processing.
It will be appreciated that the concept of the[0026]micro-beam friction liner10 can also be characterized and expressed as a method of facilitating a transfer of energy, in the form of, for example, momentum and torque, from thestator14 to therotor16. Referring to FIG. 3, first the wave is generated through piezoelectric action, as depicted inbox50, wherein the wave has a certain energy. Next, the energy of the wave is transferred to and stored in themicro-beam projections24 in the form of compression and bending, as depicted inbox52. This occurs as the second ends28 of the plurality ofmicro-beam projections24 make contact with thestator teeth22 moving relative to therotor16 during an elliptic traversal, and, as eachstator tooth22 moves up and tangentially ahead of therotor16, a number of themicro-beam projections24 are compressed and bent in the direction of rotation. Lastly, as thestator tooth22 completes the elliptic path traversal, themicro-beam projections24 react against thestator tooth22 as they decompress and unbend and thereby transfer the stored energy to therotor16 in the form of momentum and torque, as depicted inbox54.
It will also be appreciated that, although described herein in the context of facilitating the transfer of torque and momentum from elliptical motion caused by traveling waves, the[0027]micro-beam friction liner10 of the present invention may also be used to facilitate a transfer of energy in non-elliptic contact motors, such as, for example, standing wave motors which rely more on impact rather than contact along an elliptical path.
From the preceding description, it will be appreciated that the[0028]micro-beam friction liner10 of the present invention provides a number of substantial advantages over the prior art, including, for example, increased performance and efficiency through improved torque transfer, and reduced wear through decreased slippage. Furthermore, themicro-beam friction liner10 allows for replacement of organic and polymer friction materials used in prior art friction liners with inorganic materials, primarily metals, to further increase friction and wearability. Additionally, themicro-beam friction liner10 has a high Q, or increased reaction forces, which is believed to play an important role in transferring torque and momentum.
Although the invention has been described with reference to the preferred embodiments illustrated in the attached drawings, it is noted that equivalents may be employed and substitutions made herein without departing from the scope of the invention as recited in the claims. It will be appreciated, for example, that the micro-beam friction liner of the present invention can be adapted for use in substantially any device that uses traveling or standing waves to transfer energy from a driver to a movable element, including, for example, both linear and rotary piezoelectric motors and actuators.[0029]
Having thus described the preferred embodiment of the invention, what is claimed as new and desired to be protected by Letters Patent includes the following:[0030]