BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTIONThe invention relates to a method and a device for the processing of a fiber web or a suspension layer in a paper-, cardboard- or coating-machine or a size press for influencing the profile of the properties and in this way the paper or cardboard produced.[0001]
Despite the fact that the present invention under discussion is suitable for paper machines as well as cardboard machines, it will (for stylistic reasons only) be referred to throughout as a “paper machine”. The transition from a suspension layer to a fiber web in a former of a paper machine is called the “immobility point” by experts. Expert's current opinion is that the fibers do not change their orientation in the fiber web after that point. Due to the fact that the position of the immobility point cannot exactly be defined and, additionally, the fact that in the invention under discussion this point movable towards the press section, the term fiber web alone will be used in future. These stylistic definitions are not valid for the claims and the abstract in this text.[0002]
By the prior art many paper machines and their components are known. As examples are the publications EP 0489094 A1 and EP 0627523 A1 cited. In these publications a special kind of former is described. Both formers have in common that a suspension beam comes out of the headbox and that the beam is as broad as the width of the paper machine and that it runs into a gap between two wires of the former. There are several dewatering elements in the former, which take the water out of the suspension layer, so that linked fiber web is build at the end of the former. As the fiber web is so unstable that a suction roll of the following press section has to carefully take on fiber web without the use of a so called open draw.[0003]
The two most important characteristics of a fiber web at the end of a paper machine are the cross profiles of paper weight and the fiber orientation. Since the invention of a sectional (i.e. in zone divided working width), density controlled headbox, cross profiles are controllable independently of each other. This is published in the extra print p2971“Faserorientierungs-Querprofil” (translated: Fiber Orientation Cross Profile) by the Voith Sulzer company. But, nevertheless, despite using this headbox, the fiber orientation cross profile is often incorrect.[0004]
As every person skilled in the art knows, at headboxes, which are not sectionally, density controlled, it is more difficult to approximately control the desired basis weight cross profile and the fiber orientation cross profile.[0005]
Substantially the dewatering of a fiber web in a former is made by the forming roll and to the direction of the wire running over the working width cross directional orientated following dewatering slats (=ledges). In some cases the dewatering is made by dragging blades, foils and so called skimmers. In the past with table paper machines (=Fourdrinier paper machines) register (or table) rolls were used. In spite of the invention of the sectional, density controlled headbox, there is an additional and significant problem in the paper production. Because the dewatering line from the headbox outlet to the immobility point amounts to a few meters and because the suspension beam is highly turbulent, the fiber orientation by the dewatering in the former undergoes significant disturbances, which are cause worsening the fiber orientation cross profile.[0006]
A further disadvantage in prior art is the point that in the former the fiber orientation cross profile can only be little influenced. The influencing, for example, is made—in a view the width of the machine—by means of different pressure against the dewatering element. In prior art the dewatering elements are substantially rigid elements, so even if pressure is only applied at a pressing at one point of the dewatering elements, neighboring regions of that pressing point are also affected. Therefore—as one could say—a so called “emitting” effect is caused by the dewatering elements. Altogether the pressed area amounts to perhaps 1 meter. Due to the varying pressure on the dewatering elements, a cross directional flow (i.e. cross directional to the wire running direction) in the fiber web occurs. This causes further disadvantages because of the dependent interaction of the basis weight cross profile, the fiber orientation cross profile and the dry content cross profile (see extra print p2971).[0007]
Every time, if the wire of a former runs over a dewatering element, pressure pulses have an effect on the fiber web. This is, for example, written in the extra print p3025e “High Technology Components for Cost Effective Paper Machine Upgrading” by Voith Sulzer Paper Technology,[0008]page 4 and 5. A further disadvantage in prior art is that the number of pulses are the same as the number of dewatering elements and therefore the number of pulses are limited. Furthermore, the pulse itself is a technological disadvantage: According to Fourier-mathematics a pulse is a superposition of different sine- and cosine-functions, which are whole-numbered multiples of a basic frequency. The pulseform is the result of the hydrodynamic situation between the dewatering elements and the wire. If the hydrodynamic givens change temporarily even a little (for example by an alteration in the water shim between the dewatering element and the wire), it is possible that the ranges of the frequency spectrum, which is responsible for a good fiber orientation (or retention), is not available. The pulseform alterations just have an effect on the higher ranges of the frequency spectrum and just this ranges are very powerful, which is clearly advantageous.
A further disadvantage in prior art is that the pulses substantially are vertical to the fiber web and to the wires respectively. Also the pulses—in view over the width of the paper machine—only partially influenced by varying pressure against the dewatering elements, which causes the already mentioned disadvantage of the “emitting” effect.[0009]
It is the object of the invention to provide a method, a devise and a paper which would reduce or avoid the cited disadvantages.[0010]
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONAs already stated, if the suspension beam leaves the outlet of the headbox, the is only a little and an insufficient possibility for influencing the basis weight and/or the fiber orientation cross profile by the dewatering elements. Fundamentally, this problem is based on the fiber web, which is “caught” between two wires. Because the wires are running, it is not possible to “grab through” the wires to influence, for example, the fiber orientation. There is also no possibility of influencing, for example, the fiber orientation by means of the gap between the wires at the tender and the drive side. This method of influencing is not possible, because it has to effect at least than half of the width of the fiber web. The width of the fiber web amounts to perhaps 10 meters, but the distance between the wires amounts only a few millimeters. Therefore today the influencing over the gaps is not controllable. This lack of control also occurs, because the regions of the fiber web, which are closer to the tender or drive side, hide the more inner regions of the fiber web.[0011]
Therefore, the inventor searched for a constructional element, which would allow to “grab through” at least one wire. This tool ought to be able to influence through the meshes of the running wire, but without placing itself in the meshes. Because that area of the paper machine is a “rough” environment and a such fine material tool would not be practical, the inventor had the idea that one should send a directed energy to the meshes. Because non insulated electrical energy in a wet environment is not practical (because of possible electric shocks), the decision was made in favor of sound energy. The wave fronts of the sound waves are destroyed by the strings of the wire, but—as the inventor discovered—by the Principle of Huyghens, elementary waves arise in the meshes of the wire and on the other side of the wire that elementary waves interfere with each other to wave fronts again.[0012]
Influencing on a fiber web by means of a sound field has an elementary advantage: The sound field is positionable directly to the desired region of the fiber web which needs to be influenced, because the sound field is positionable on the opposite side of the wire, which is the region, which shall be influenced. The distance to the fibers between the wire surface amounts less then one millimeter (the thickness of a wire is, for example, 0.7 millimeter) and not few meters as in prior art. As shown, by the described first step of the invention, the wire is no serious barrier. A further advantage in comparison to the influencing with dewatering ledges is, that with the invention the “emitting” effect does not occur.[0013]
In physics the so called Kundt's Dust Figures and Chladni's Sound Figures are well-known. In these figures particles take an orientation by means of vibrations at a horizontal plane surface (particle accumulations in vertical direction in relation to the horizontal plane surface can be ignored). An orientation of the particles—as would be necessary, for example, for a fiber orientation—is not known in the cited figures. Also the forms of the figures are not practicable for the influencing of a fiber web, because a homogeneity of a fiber web is desired.[0014]
With the current average fiber web width of up to 10 meters, one single sound field wouldn't be enough and by use of at least two (in relation to the working width) spotlike sound fields, interference hyperbolas will occur. Therefore, a homogeneous sound field between the wires are impossible.[0015]
Thus the question is, how must the form of a sound field be designed for the influencing, for example, of the fiber orientation. Furthermore, does a fiber web transitioning sound field only shake up the fibers—like feathers in a pillow—or do the fibers receive a defined orientation from the direction of the sound field. In the magazine article “Das Ultraschallfeld als Kaltgasfalle” from “Spektrum der Wissenschaft” (translated: The Ultrasound Field as Cold Gas Trap) from January 2000 (German edition of Scientific American) the inventor has discovered that it is possible to let hang ice crystals by means of an ultrasound field. In the aspect of hanging particles for the described device, the inventor saw a further part of the solution for the particles of the Kundt's Dust respectively Chladni's Sound Figures. The ultrasound is not absolutely essential for the “Cold Gas Trap”, but because of its higher energy it is a helpful tool. Whilst researching the studies in basic literature (Physics and Technique of Ultrasound, author Heinrich Kuttruff, S. Hirzel publishing house, Stuttgart, edition 1988), the inventor discovered on page 169 a treatise about the so called Pohlman-Cell. This Pohlman-Cell (quotation) “. . . is a flat box with transparent walls. To the incoming sound orientated wall is a thin foil which lets sound pass. The cell contains a liquid in which numerous little metal plates are suspended. In a state of rest these little metal plates do not have an ordered orientation. But if the little metal plates come into contact with a sound wave, so they align themselves vertical to the sounds incoming direction . . . ”. This also shows valid that ultra sound not essential, but because of its high energy density it is helpful. The described orientation of the thin plates—as referred to in physics—is based on the “effects of second order”.[0016]
Due to technical production reasons, in a paper machine, the main direction of the fiber is mostly wanted in the running direction, because then in this direction a higher tensile strength is present and, therefore, the risk of the fiber web snapping is reduced. If someone wants to use the effect of the Pohlman-Cell for the fiber orientation, for example in the running direction, so the spreading direction of the sound field must be cross directionally orientated to the running direction and must also be directed in an as acute as possible angle to the wire. By this alignment of the sound field, the fibers of the fiber web—at least partially—are orientated in a plane, which is on the one hand, in the running direction and, on the other hand, oblique between the wires. In an extreme case, the fibers in the plane are orientated with there one end to one wire and with there other end to the other wire, and not in running direction. For the moment these fibers do not contribute to an increase of tensile strength, the so called tear length. But the inventor recognized that by the gradual approximation of the wires during the run at the dewatering of the fiber web and during the dewatering flow in direction to the wire outside, these fibers turn in, respectively against, the running direction, but the fibers retain in this process there orientation in the plane of the wave fronts.[0017]
Even if the fibers, by their past movement to the sound field (together with the wires), might only turn a little bit in the plane, which is perpendicular to the spreading direction of the sound field, the fibers nevertheless take on an angular momentum and so the fibers turn again after their passing of the sound field, so that they attain the desired direction.[0018]
For the sake of completeness, it should be mentioned that in the area of the former, partly the main fiber direction—e.g. near the tender and the drive side of the fiber web—an acute angle intentionally is desired in relation to the running direction. During the further dewatering and drying process, the fiber web undergoes a shrinkage, so that finally at the end of the paper machine the main fiber direction is essentially parallel to the running direction. So one can say: the desired fiber orientation cross profile at the end of the former is not at all identical with the zero-line of a graph.[0019]
Additional to the described possibility of the alignment of fibers by means of a sound field, there is an alternative to influencing the fibers with two sound fields. These two sound fields either effect the fibers (in view of the running direction) consecutively, or simultaneously of a section of fiber web width (sectional working width). This is important to the inventive process, because that fibers are not little metal plates or thin plates (see previously cited Pohlman-Cell). The fibers are more comparable with stick-shaped elements. Therefore fibers are able to align as to the plane of wave fronts of a first sound field as well as to the plane of wave fronts of a second sound field. The fibers are then parallel to the line of intersection of these two sound fields and therefore generate the new main fiber direction. If the main fiber direction is desired in the running direction, so the line of intersection of the sound fields must be aligned in the running direction, which is possible by a respective swiveling of the sound fields around an axis, which is perpendicular to the plane of the fiber web.[0020]
The influencing of a fiber web by means of at least one directed sound field includes a further advantage: If the sound field penetrated the fiber web and an optional second wire, so suspension water will be pressed through the outer surface of the second wire. If a skimmer is placed downwards to the running direction, it is able to take this water away. In physics this lifting of water is called levitation. If a sound field is perpendicular to the fiber web, so this effect gets is maximized.[0021]
With a directed sound field, it is further possible, to unlink already linked fibers, because the wave fronts penetrate the fiber web and by this the unlinked fibers loosen their contact with other fibers. Subsequently these unlinked fibers will at least be placed down on the inner surface of the second wire. Due to this effect, the immobility point in the dewatering line in a former moves closer to the press section.[0022]
From this, a further advantage arises, in that if a few separate fiber webs are brought together (to build a multilayer fiber web), these layers can be “woven together” with a directed sound field.[0023]
An another advantage of the invention is that the influencing of fiber orientation and the influencing of basis weight cross profile in the headbox are as independent from each other as possible. In other words, by means of the invention the fiber orientation (sectional) is possible alone with a directed sound field, while the headbox controls only the desired basis weight cross profile. It is also intended that by use of a sectional density controlled headbox, the fiber orientation in the consecutive former can improved by the present invention.[0024]
But not only fibers can be aligned with a directed sound field: generally color particles haven't a sphere form. The kaolin used in paper production has a lamella like structure. By reason of the above mentioned facts it is understandable that color particles can also be aligned by the proposed method. If the color particles—or, for example, little metal plates—are mixed into the suspension and the wave fronts are parallel to the surface of the fiber web, so the particles or the little metal plates will also undergo a parallel orientation to the surface of the fiber web. If the sound field in this embodiment does not effect the whole width of the fiber web, a colored signature in the fiber web is possible, which is translucent in the dry fiber web. If the sound field additionally is oscillating and/or intermitting, so line shaped or pattern shaped signatures can be designed. This has the advantage that, for example, paper documents and also paper money can be provided with a kind of signature, which is positioned inside the paper and not printed on the paper and therefore exceptionally counterfeitproof. But in this way the fibers are also alignable so that, for example, with a special lamp the inventive signature can be read or checked. This method of reading works by light reflection and/or light transition.[0025]
Color particles in the sump of a coating machine or color particles at the surface of a fiber web in a coating machine can also be aligned, by means of the invention, parallel to the fiber web surface. There is the advantage that the irregular color plates can be aligned in layers and therefore the aligned plates can better glide relative to each other at the coating operation or the doctoring process. This means that the shearing stress in the coating color can be reduced by the invention. By this gliding, the color particles don't hook together or don't block, which otherwise would create a thicker and above all an irregular coating film. A positive side effect is that the sound field in the sump of a coating machine can destroy color lumps and/or can remove containing gases out of the coating color.[0026]
A further, very essential advantage of the invention is that the spreading speed of a sound field in a liquid amounts to nearly 1500 m/s, but the working speed of a modern paper machine is only 30 m/s. If a sound field, for example, has a width of 100 mm (in the running direction of the fiber web) and a frequency of 20,000 Hz, so the fibers are influenced by a total 67 vibrations in their run over the sound field. In comparison to the formers of the prior art with their limited number of slats (dewatering ledges), the inventive use of the sound field presents a much higher number of pulses, wherein the pulses/vibrations not only influence the dewatering, but also influence selectively the orientation of fibers and other particles. This just mentioned advantage can be heightened, if the chosen frequency is substantially higher. Because the inventive device—in view of the running direction—is very narrow, either it is possible to place the device between two slats or to place instead of few slats (dewatering ledges) . So at least the number of ledges substantially remains the same.[0027]
The inventive sound fields are generated by an electric powered emitter. Every emitter consists of a power unit and a housing. The drive is created by a coil, a magnetic piston and a membrane or by piezo elements or the drive works on the magnetostrictive or capacitive principle. The surface of the power unit which emits the sound field does generally has a parallel stroke. Because the emitters are electrically driven, their power units can be designed by means of electro-technics and electronics in manifold ways. By using a central control unit, vibrations for each power unit are individually adjustable. By superposition of vibrations, periodic pulses can also be generated. The vibrations will be defined, for example at the control unit, in their amplitude, phase, frequency and energy. So that for every power unit a separate cable need not be laid, it is particularly advantageous, if the control occurs by means of a central data bus. Because with a paper machine several kinds of paper will be produced and therefore a lot of production parameters are necessary, it is advantageous, if the parameters of the inventive device are stored in a database of the control unit. If production of a specific kind of paper with know parameters will be restarted, the parameters will be reloaded from the storage. Production costs are reduced due to this increased efficiency. Further it is advantageous if the control unit is linked to an online-measuring system, for example, to a so called measuring frame.[0028]
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGSFurther advantageous embodiments of the invention are the object of pending claims and will be explained in the context of the description of the FIGS.[0029]9 to43. The FIGS.1 to8 show illustrating prior art.
FIG. 1: one embodiment of a former;[0030]
FIG. 2: another embodiment of a former;[0031]
FIG. 3: detail of a former with dewatering elements (ledges and dragging blades);[0032]
FIG. 4: dewatering element foil;[0033]
FIG. 5: dewatering element register (or table) roll;[0034]
FIG. 6: graph of a fiber orientation cross profile;[0035]
FIG. 7: detail and top view of a fiber web with main fiber directions drawn in;[0036]
FIG. 8: a magnified detail from FIG. 7;[0037]
FIG. 9: cross section through wires and fiber web with a perpendicular aligned sound field;[0038]
FIG. 10: cross section through wires and fiber web with an inclined aligned sound field;[0039]
FIG. 11: section A-A in FIG. 10;[0040]
FIG. 12: section A-A in FIG. 10 at a later time as in FIG. 11;[0041]
FIG. 13: cross section through wires and fiber web with two inclined sound fields in the running direction consecutively arranged;[0042]
FIG. 14: cross section through wires and fiber web with two inclined sound fields which interfere directly with each other;[0043]
FIG. 15: cross section through wires and fiber web with two inclined sound fields which interfere directly-but mutually-with each other;[0044]
FIG. 16: cross section through wires and fiber web with two inclined sound fields which interfere directly with each other and with a sound field duplicator;[0045]
FIG. 17: cross section through wires and fiber web with an origin sound field, which directly interferes with each other by several sound field duplicators;[0046]
FIG. 18: cross section through wires and fiber web with wedge-shaped origin sound field and a diverging reflector;[0047]
FIG. 19: cross section through wires and fiber web with wedge-shaped origin sound field and a rotating diverge reflector;[0048]
FIG. 20: as FIG. 19, but the reflected sound field is perpendicular to the fiber web;[0049]
FIG. 21: cross section through wires and fiber web with a rotating aperture plate;[0050]
FIG. 22: detail of a fiber web with several signatures;[0051]
FIG. 23: cross section through wires and fiber web with a trapezoid-shaped sound field;[0052]
FIG. 24: cross section through wires and fiber web with an arrangement for standing waves;[0053]
FIG. 25: graph of a fiber orientation cross profile;[0054]
FIG. 26: detail of a fiber web;[0055]
FIG. 27: cross section through wires and fiber web with a wedge-shaped water gap between an incline emitter and a first wire;[0056]
FIG. 28: cross section through wires and fiber web with a wedge-shaped water gap between an perpendicular emitter and a first wire;[0057]
FIG. 29: cross section through wires and fiber web with a parallel water gap between an perpendicular emitter and a first wire;[0058]
FIG. 30: top view to a fiber web with a device for drawing a signature;[0059]
FIG. 31: section A-A to FIG. 30;[0060]
FIG. 32: section through a “Fresnel”-reflector;[0061]
FIG. 33: top view to FIG. 32;[0062]
FIG. 34: section through triple-prism-reflector;[0063]
FIG. 35: detail of view A from FIG. 34;[0064]
FIG. 36: stretched view from FIG. 35;[0065]
FIG. 37: cross section through wires and fiber web, emitter and two reflectors;[0066]
FIG. 38: cross section through wires and fiber web, emitter and three reflectors;[0067]
FIG. 39: section A-A to FIGS. 37 and 38;[0068]
FIG. 40: alternative section A-A to the FIGS. 37 and 38;[0069]
FIG. 41: coating apparatus of a coating machine;[0070]
FIG. 42: detail A from FIG. 41;[0071]
FIG. 43: detail B from FIG. 41.[0072]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PRESENT INVENTIONFIG. 1 shows a kind of former, which is published in the above cited document EP 0489 094 A1. A suspension stream comes out of the[0073]headbox3, which will surrounded by twowires1,2 and dewatered in a first dewatering line I by means of a curved dewatering element (here a forming shoe). The following dewatering line II is characterized by partly fixed and partlyflexible ledges5. The final dewatering line III consists of about at least one stationary dewatering element (for example forming shoe, suction box). The forming shoe also consists of ledges, but these ledges in contrast to theledges5 are a fixed components of the formingshoe4.
In the former of FIG. 2 a former is shown, which is published in the document EP 0627 523 A1. The first dewatering element after the[0074]headbox3 is here a formingroll10, which follows a forming shoe.4. In a further unit are arranged double ledges9 andsimple ledges5. The dewatering in these twin wire zones ends with asuction box8 and asuction roll7.
In FIG. 3 is an arrangement of dragging[0075]blades11 andledges5 in a twin wire zone of a former shown (FIG. 6 by EP 0516 601 A1) . Theledges5 have at there ends, which are facingwire1, ceramic linings. This ceramic linings are connected by means of V-shaped fittings. Thedragging blades11 affect—similar to theledges5—pressure pulses towards to thewires1,2 respectively to the fiber web orsuspension layer12 at the movement of thewires1,2 in runningdirection15.
Foil[0076]13 shown in FIG. 4 strips off the suspension water with the help of a left orientated nose. This dewatering principle also affects a pressure pulse to thefiber web12. Further along the course of thewire2 the wire section comes to a diverging wedge, which is placed between the foil13 and thewire2. The suspension water, which sticks to the outer surface of the wire, creates in the subsequent movement of the wire a suction effect towards thefiber web12.
In FIG. 5 is the relative outdated dewatering principle of dewatering pulse generation by means of register rolls[0077]14 shown. Generally awire2 was only arranged at the lower surface of thefiber web12. In the view of the runningdirection15 at the narrowing gap between the register roll14 a pressure pulse occurs. At the other side of theregister roll14 the opening gap affects a suction force towards thefiber web12.
The embodiments to the prior art of FIGS.[0078]1 to5 is common that the number of pulses for the dewatering and the fiber orientation—respective formation—is very limited and an individual adjustment to the pressure of the ledges for the sections of the width (sectional adjustment) is only insufficiently given.
FIGS.[0079]6 to8 must considered in context. FIG. 6 shows a graph with a measured17 and a desired18 fiber orientation cross profile. The letter A stands here, for example, for the tender side of a paper machine and the letter B stands accordingly for the drive side. At the left vertical axis is the angle of the main fiber direction to the runningdirection15. FIG. 7 shows the section of thefiber web12, which corresponds to the graph of FIG. 6. The fully line drawing of themain fiber directions20 corresponds to graph17; the broken line drawing of themain fiber directions20 corresponds to graph18. The lengths of themain fiber directions20 shall represent the amount of the particular breaking length. In this example everymain fiber direction20 is chosen to be as long as the other and respectively the same size as the other. FIG. 8 shows a quasi microscopic magnified detail of FIG. 7. Thefibers21 are not all orientated in one direction, themain fiber direction20, nevertheless one can see that the majority of the fibers are orientated to themain fiber direction20. If more fibers were aligned to themain fiber direction20, the breaking length would increase in this direction, to be borne by the perpendicular herewith orientated breaking length. A breaking length ratio (breaking length along (=Ra) to breaking length cross (=Rc) will increase by a further shifting of thefibers21 in themain fiber direction20.
In FIG. 9 a basic idea of the invention is presented. In order to better illustrate of the invention, FIG. 9 (and partially in other FIGS. )[0080]wires1,2 and thefiber web12 are magnified in comparison to other components. Thefiber web12, which is between thewires1,2, is penetrated by a (aligned perpendicularly to the plane of the wires)sound field25. Thissound field25 is generated by anemitter22, which consists of apower unit23 and a housing24. In this embodiment the transmittingmedia27 is enclosed between the housing24, the outer surface of thewire2 and the surface of thepower unit23, which is faced to thewire2. In this embodimentflat sound waves26 of thesound field25 start from the surface of the power unit. By the already explained principle of the Pohlman-Cell, thefibers21 will orientate themselves parallel to the surface of thepower unit23. Before thefibers21 come into the sound field25 (shown on the left side of the FIG.), they are orientated disorderly. In thesound field25 thefibers21 align themselves parallel to the planes of thewave fronts26. The dot-shapedillustrated fibers21 in thesound field25—and also at the right side the FIG.—arefibers21, which are admittedly “stick-shaped”, but are perpendicularly orientated to the plane of the FIG. and look therefore like a dot. The perpendicular arrangement of thesound field25 causes a sound pressure, so water from thefiber web12 will be pressed to the outer surface of thewire1. Thissurface water31 can be skimmed off with askimmer6. In spite of the porosity of a wire for asound field25, a wire nevertheless has a resistance. The more porous a wire is realized, themore surface water31 will produced.
The[0081]liquid transmitting media27 is very similar to the suspension water in its compound and its composition. Because it is possible that the transmittingmedia27 and the suspension water mix themselves together, is it sensible, if the transmittingmedia27 consists of suspension water or clear water. In this respect, the transmittingmedia27 is important to the invention, because a good acoustic-mechanical coupling occurs between thepower unit23 and thefiber web12. If there was—for example at least partly—an air cushion between thepower unit23 and thefiber web12, little of the energy of thepower unit23 would be transmitted to thefiber web12. An air cushion in the meshes of the wire in the dewatering zone of a former is unlikely, because these meshes are full of suspension water.
In contrast to FIG. 9, in FIG. 10 the[0082]emitter22 is inclined at anangle30 to the plane of thefiber web12. Thefibers21 here don't orientate themselves parallel to thewires1,2, but they orientate themselves parallel to the line of intersection A-A. FIG. 11 shows the plane of intersection A-A and the orientation of the fibers in this plane. If the plane of intersection A-A runs further in the runningdirection15 and thewires1,2 come closer to each other, so thefibers21 will have an orientation crosswise to the runningdirection15. Because this orientation is often undesired, by changing theswivel angle29 of theemitter22 one can adjust—in relation to the runningdirection15—another alignment of thefibers21. By the inclining of theemitter22 towards thefiber web12, the effect of squeezing out the suspension water will be reduced, but in FIG. 10 an arrangement of askimmer6 nevertheless is possible.
By means of the arrangement of an[0083]inclined emitter22 in FIG. 10, an alignment of thefibers21 is possible, which affects the fiber orientation cross profile.
In FIG. 13 a further basic idea of the invention is shown. In view over the running[0084]direction15, thefiber web12 will be consecutively influenced by two sound fields25. If thefibers21 will at first be aligned by theleft sound field25, so thosefibers21 will be aligned, by running through theright sound field25, which are crosswise orientated to theright sound field25. Finally after the running of thefiber web12 through theright sound field25, all fibers are aligned crosswise to the runningdirection15. The alignment offibers21, with two to each other intersecting sound fields25 is then particularly effective, if the sound fields25 are at right angles to each other. Because generally a fiber orientation in the runningdirection15 is desired—in view over the runningdirection15—a consecutive influencing of the twosound fields25 is not the best constructive solution. If the running direction in FIG. 13 were to be vertical to the plane of the FIG., the sound fields25 wouldn't cross each other.
In FIG. 14 two[0085]sound fields25 are arranged in such way that they interfere to each other in thefiber web12. The running direction16 (vertical to the plane of the FIG.; the arrow is shown in and out of the plane) shows that the fibers are now parallel to the runningdirection16. Here also it is valid that a particularly effective alignment of thefibers21 will occur, if the sound fields25 are at a right angles to each other.
It is not necessary that the crossing sound fields[0086]25 are act from one side of thefiber web12. In FIG. 15 a solution is shown, in which the sound fields25 act from both sides of thefiber web12. This arrangement is constructively not very satisfying, because for any desired modification of the fiber orientation, both sound fields25 must synchronically swiveled inangle29. This requires an adjust mechanism on both sides of thefiber web12.
A better solution is shown in FIG. 16. Here also two crossing sound fields[0087]25 act to thefiber web12. Thefirst sound field25 is directly generated by theemitter22. In this sound field25 a so calledduplicator32 is arranged. Thisduplicator32 consists preferable of a flat wall. The form of thesecond sound field25 results from the laws of reflection for sound at the surface of the duplicator-wall. The inclination of theduplicator32 in relation to thefirst sound field25 is chosen in such way that both sound fields are interfere at the fiber web12 (the angle of the duplicator-wall to the median line of the first sound field is half as great as the angle between both sound field median lines). The advantage of this construction is that only oneemitter22 is necessary, but nevertheless twosound fields25 are available and by swiveling theemitter22 at anangle29, only one mechanism will be required.
In FIG. 17 crossing sound fields are shown, which are generated by means of a[0088]duplicator32. The difference to FIG. 16 is that, only one emitter22 (in this case perpendicular to the fiber web12) and a plurality ofduplicators32 generate the sound fields25. The effect of levitation will supported by the perpendicularly orientatedsound field25 at the same time. Because of the here used plurality of the duplicator32 (for reasons of geometry) the distance from the surface of thepower unit23 to the outer surface of thewire2 can be shortened in design. By a suitable choice of the parameter a, b, c for theduplicator32, the width, the inclining angle of the duplicated sound fields can be influenced. Also the “free passages” for the non inclined sound field can be designed. The broken, vertical lines illustratefurther emitters22, which are arranged, for example, in view over the runningdirection16, behind the plane of the FIG. The other broken lines show sound fields25 andduplicators32 for thesefurther emitters22. Additionally, theemitter22 could be designed revolving to the wire-normal. In a further embodiment theemitter22 can—alone or together with itsduplicators32—be inclined to the plane of thefiber web12.
In context of the invention, the[0089]wave fronts26 need not always be flat. FIG. 18 shows wavefronts26 which are trough-shaped. This is achieved by a trough-shaped power unit surface. in this way thewave fronts26 run towards a focus. Here there is areflector34 with a preferable parallel compensation. If the reflector is designed two-dimensionally and approximately parabolically-shaped and the focus of the trough-shapedwave fronts26 coincides with the focus of thereflector34, thenflat wave fronts26 will be directed in the manner shown to the fiber web. At the given runningdirection15, the fiber orientation will be crosswise to it. If anadditional reflector33 is used, for example as a flat object, so the sound field would be reflected back to thefiber web12 and could affect a further alignment of thefibers12, as shown in FIG. 13. The trough-shapedpower unit23 has the advantage that the energy of a perhaps weak, parabolic-shaped sound field will be focused. Because the trough-shapedwave fronts26—at least near the focus—do not affect a unified orientation of thefibers21, such a sound field will not be suitable for the alignment offibers21 without areflector34. But these trough-shapedwave fronts26 are suitable, for example, in order to press water out of thefiber web12, or in order to heat thefiber web12 to support the dewatering or drying process.
In FIG. 19 the surface of the[0090]power unit23 is a hollow sphere-shaped design wherein the sound field is also hollow sphere-shaped. Thereflector34 has an advantageous three-dimensional parabolic-shaped design, so that the reflected sound field has substantiallyflat wave fronts26. Thereflector34 is mounted by means ofholders37 on a ring-shapedmotor rotor38. The ring-shapedmotor rotor38 is supported byguides39, which are in the housing24 of theemitter22. Outside the housing24 a ring-shapedmotor stator35 is placed. It is advantageous, if this motor is a stepping motor. By means of a connectingcable36, a stepping frequency, controlling the turning direction and the number of steps, the stepping motor will be driven. So several revolution speeds, forward or backward runs, swivel movements (for example only parts of one degree) and specific angle positions are possible. In this way thesound field25 in unfixed at a sectional position and is able—together with the movement of thefiber web12 in runningdirection15,16—“to write”. Fibers, color particles or little plates—for example of metal—in thefiber web12 will acquire an orientation defined by the sound field. This orientation can be seen as asignature40 in the furnished paper or cardboard after a further approach of the wires at a further dewatering process.
With magnetizeable metal particles a magnetic signatures can also be produced.[0091]
A signature is also possible with particles, which have elastic volume. This has the advantage that, for example, a pimpled signature, which will be pressed together by the surface pressure of a drying cylinders, yankee dryers or calander rolls, afterwards can stretch these pimples.[0092]
In the context of the invention a veined metal strip, as for example in banknotes, also can be fixed in its position. This metal strip can Also prevented in a otherwise possible twisting along its longitudinal axis.[0093]
A[0094]optional reflector33 is able to throw back the sound field to the fiber web. According to the dimensioning of the sound field in thefiber web12, either aparallel signature40 will be generated, or at interfering sound fields, the signature will become more intensive. If thesound field25 is operated intermittently, so by a control logic, which depends on the speed of the runningdirection15,16 and depends on the speed of themotor rotor38, asignature40 can be written into the paper (as a defined pattern or lettering/logo).
In contrast to FIG. 19, in FIG. 20 the sound field is perpendicular to the[0095]fiber web12. This is possible, because the sound field coming from thepower unit23 by means ofdeflection41 will be directed to thereflector34. This perpendicular sound field affects a—to the fiber web surface—parallel orientation of fibers, possible existing color particles or little metal plates, without following approach of thewires1,2. By means of an optional use of areflector33 and a coordinated wave length, the sound field in the fiber web can even be designed as a standing wave. A standing wave has fundamentally the constructive creative possibility that heavier matter will be collected in the wave antinode. Beside the wave antinodes the lighter matter will take place. Thus a well-directed lamination, which, together with the “writing” by means of asound field25, creates the possibility of a three-dimensional signature. This three-dimensional signature will survive the drying of the paper and can be felt. The human sense of touch is able to feel unevenness of a hundredth of a millimeter. If at the described lamination the suspension water is the lighter matter, so the water will be brought near to the inner surface of the wires and the water can more easily leave the space between the wires. This method can also be used to open the meshes of the wires, because the little fibers, which block the meshes will be brought to the wave antinode. In this way cleaning the wires is possible. It is to be understood that the use of a standing wave can be used without a “writing” sound field. This will be explained at later FIGS.
In FIG. 21 a further variation to FIGS. 19 and 20 is shown. In this example a[0096]flat sound field25 comes from thepower unit23 and directly hits thefiber web12. In order to get a slim sound field for “writing”, anaperture plate42 is arranged in themotor rotor38, which has for example an eccentric hole. FIG. 21 shows this embodiment only exemplary. In construction the relatively short distance from the surface of thepower unit23 to thefiber web12 can be further reduced.
FIG. 22 shows[0097]several signatures40. The signature in embodiment a) was generated by arotating sound field25 and the movement of thefiber web12. In example b) thesound field25 made different swivelling movements, which were superpositioned with the movement of thefiber web12. In form c) thesound field25 made a rotating movement, which was also superpositioned with the linear movement of thefiber web12, but here thesound field25 was driven in an intermittent mode, so a “writing” with a liftable, fictitious pen can be realized. Naturally other FIGS. in the context of the invention are also possible, as for example Lissajous-figures, cycloids, epicycloids, lemniskates etc.
In the description of FIG. 18 it was explained that trough-shaped[0098]wave fronts26—at least near the focus—for a fiber orientation are not very suitable. In FIG. 23 a trough-shapedsound field26 is shown. Thewave fronts26, which penetrate thefiber web12, correspond approximately to the middle distance of a sound field between the surface of thepower unit23 and the focus of thesound field25. In this distance thewave fronts26 are sufficiently flat, so that additional to a levitation a limited fiber orientation is also possible. If the cited trough-shapedwave fronts26 are from a region, which is closer to the surface of thepower unit23, so this wave front can better be used for fiber orientation. If theemitter22 is inclined to the plane of thefiber web12 or thewires1,2, so one can indeed use this embodiment for the fiber orientation cross profile of afiber web12.
FIG. 24 shows a more detailed embodiment with an inclined dewatering line. In this embodiment on the left side two[0099]emitter22 are arranged, which are facing to each other. Between thepower units23 of theseemitters22 supply and out pipes for the transmittingmedias27 are shown. The housings24 of theemitters22 at the interfaces to thewires1,2 are equipped with a sliding surface45 (preferably ceramic). The slidingsurface45 has an opening in the middle, with it the transmittingmedia27 and therefore thewave fronts26 are in a swinging mechanical connection to thefiber web12. By the movement of thewires1,2 in runningdirection15 transmittingmedia27 can be swept away. The supply pipes exist for the loss of transmittingmedia27. In this current form thetransmitters22 operate in such a mode that between them a standingwave49 will occur and because of that, suspension water will be pressed out of thefiber web12 at the surfaces of thewires1,2, which are not facing to thefiber web12. Because of the pressed out suspension water, the spheres with the transmittingmedia27 needoutlet pipes44, thus a build-up of suspension water or respectively transmittingmedia27 will be avoided. In the context of the invention, when used with sound fields, especially when used at a high frequency, little air bubbles occur in the transmittingmedia27. Therefore it is important that the outlet pipe is arranged at the highest point of the transmittingmedia27; so the bubbles are able to leave the transmittingmedia27. If there is at the same time a supply pipe, a continuous exchange of the transmitting media is possible. This has the advantage that the transmittingmedia27 also serves as cooling media for thepower unit23, the sliding surfaces and thewires1,2. Further, a possibly polluted transmittingmedia27 can be replaced. When supply and outlet pipes are used simultaneously one should pay attention that in the transmittingmedia27 there is no excess pressure toward thefiber web12, because otherwise the transmittingmedia27 will press into thefiber web12. At the above shown arrangement in FIG. 24, areflector33 with a sensor47 is linked to theemitter22. This sensor47 is provided with a sensor-measurement connection48. This sensor-measurement connection is permitted by a control circuit to adjust theemitter22 frequency, so that a desired wave form—here a standingwave49—can be generated. The sliding surfaces45 of thereflector33 and theemitter22, which are facing thewires1,2, are provided with a little radius or a wedge-shaped edge.
Therefore a small quantity of surface water will generate a water film. Therefore dry friction isn't possible between the sliding[0100]surfaces45 and the wires.
FIGS. 25 and 26 must be considered together. Already in FIGS. 6 and 7 the conditions of the influencing of the fiber orientation cross profile were explained. Here FIG. 25 shows a desired fiber orientation cross profile[0101]18. FIG. 26 illustrates a clipping of afiber web12 with the below arranged sound fields25. The elliptical form of the sound fields25 results from their inclined positioning to the fiber web12 (a slanted line of intersection to a round object creates an elliptical form). The broken line, which is congruent with the smaller diameter of the ellipse, show the line of intersection of thewave fronts26 with thefiber web12 and at the same time this line is the adjusted main fiber direction. If by a lack of space, the sound fields25—and therefore theemitters22—are not positionable side by side crosswise to the runningdirection15, so there would be no disadvantage to adjusting the fiber orientation cross profile, if the sound fields25 (respectively emitter22), are arranged in two rows. For this arrangement in two rows, it is advantageous, if the sound fields25 are arranged with anoverlap51, because almost allfibers21 influenced for approximately the same long period will respectively get approximately the same quantity of energy at their transition by thesound field25. If between the former and the press section of a paper machine on every side of thefiber web12 anedge strip50 is cut down, a use of sound fields in this outer area of thefiber web12 isn't necessary.
In FIGS. 27, 28 and[0102]29, the running direction is perpendicular to the plane of the FIGS. These FIGS. relate toemitters22, which are operate—for example—magnetostrictive. The transmittingmedia27 in these embodiments are only a liquid film. In FIGS. 27 and 28 there is a wedge-shaped gap between the emitter surface and thewire2. Furthermore the emitter surface is inclined to the swingingdirection52. If thewave fronts26 leave the emitter surface, so they will be diffracted as illustrated way by their transition from the thicker to the thinner matter (=liquid transmitting media27). This represents a refraction of asound field25. A loss of transmittingmedia27 by means of the movement of thewires1,2 and thefiber web12 would be compensated by thesurface water31.
FIGS. 30 and 31 show a writing[0103]head53 for writing and drawingsignatures40. This writinghead53 is an alternative device to the devices of FIGS.19 to21. This device has the advantage that—except for thepower unit23 no mobile components are necessary. In FIG. 30 the top view of the writinghead53 without thewire1 is shown. This device is characterized by, a plurality ofemitters22—perhaps in planes one on top of the other—arranged star-shaped to the area of thefiber web12, in which one will write. This star-shaped arrangement allows that sound fields25 are very closely positionable to the area, where thefiber web12 shall written. The sound fields25 are led by means of conduits to the area, which is to be written. By means of the transition of thefiber web12 stripe-shaped lines occur along the writinghead53, in which oneemitter22 will do its writing work. By means of a suitable control device—similar to a control device in a dot matrix or ink-jet printer—by individual sound field activities, a figure, a sign or a different signature can be generated. The diameters of theconduits55 amount to only a few millimeters. The results is that thefiber web12 is only at theconduits55 for a fraction of a second in the transition. But these areas of thefiber web12 by means of a appropriate frequency—preferably ultrasound—are sufficiently supplied withwave fronts26 .
FIG. 31 shows more clearly the path of the sound fields[0104]25 from theemitter22 to thefiber web12 of FIG. 30. Deviation of theconduits55 is achieved by means of thereflectors33. The surface of the writinghead53 is either spaced to the wire2 (wherein the gap is moistened with surface water31), or the writinghead53 is provided with a sliding surface. Because of the regained energy of thesound field25, which comes out of thewire1, an arrangement of areflector33 is possible here. By a suitable tuning of the wave length, even a standingwave49 between thereflector33 and the surface of the power unit23 (and therefore also in the fiber web12) can be realized.
FIG. 32 shows a[0105]reflector33, which throws a sound field back on itself. Thesound field25 is inclined to the wire surfaces and thefiber web12. For this it is necessary that the reflecting surfaces of thereflector33 are parallel to thewave fronts26. By means of the inclined saw-shaped cross section, the reflector is able to be designed very low. Here principle of a Fresnel-lens is used. The intimated (drawn with broken lines) form of thereflector23, has a simple structure, but it has greater height and is therefore in construction not so suitable.
The top view of FIG. 32 is shown in FIG. 33. The incompletely presented[0106]emitter22 is below the wires and thefiber web12. In the center of FIG. 33 one can see an ellipse. This is the cut surface of thesound field25 with the plane of the wires and thefiber web12. The vertically broken lines show the edges of the ribs of the saw-shapedreflector33. Therewith the space between thewire1 and the reflecting surfaces can filled, rinsed and/or cooled, because thereflector33 has a supply and a outlet pipe for the transmitting media. If for a correction of the fiber orientation cross profile anotherswivel angle29 for thesound field25 is necessary (and one will keep the reflection in itself) a simultaneous correction of the swivel angle of thereflector54 is necessary.
Another embodiment of the[0107]reflector33 is shown in the FIGS. 34 and 36. Here the reflecting surface consists of a plurality of mounted hollow triple-prisms. These hollow triple-prisms are known in optics and there they reflect a beam of light upon three mirror planes perpendicular to each other and after a triple reflection, back to its origin. This reflection is also valid for thewave fronts26 of asound field25. This hollow triple-prism has a significant advantage in comparison to the saw-shaped reflector that even if thesound field25 is swilled, a swiveling of the reflector isn't necessary. So one saves using an adjust mechanism and the handling is easier and faster. If asupply pipe43 for the transmittingmedia27 is arranged in the way shown andconduits55 lead the transmittingmedia27 in the extreme corner of each hollow triple-prism, so in this corners don't deposit rests of fibers or dirt.
FIG. 35 is view A of FIG. 34. Here the slat-shaped structure of the triple-prism arrangement is visible. This slat-shaped structure is very advantageous, because otherwise treatment with a rotating tool (cutting by chip removal or grinding) in the tops of the corners of the “hollow” triple-prism would not be possible. By means of mounting[0108]elements56—for example bolts—the plurality of the slats can be fixed to large triple-prism plates. FIG. 36 shows slats in a single view, wherein the first (top) slat has the same pattern of structure, as the last slat. If one imagines the third slat turned by 180 degree in the plane of the FIG., one can see that it is identical to the first and the last slat.
In FIGS. 37 and 38 more realistic proportions of the[0109]wires1,2—respectively thefiber web12—in comparison to the other components take place. Up to now—for reasons of clarity—in the FIGS., the wires and the fiber web were shown enlarged.
In FIG. 37 there are two crossing sound fields[0110]25, which are generated by only one emitter. The angle drawn is preferably right-angled. After thefirst sound field25 left the surface of thepower unit23 and has penetrated thewires1,2 and thefiber web12, a horizontal reflector13 reflects the sound field to aninclined reflector33. Already there are now two crossing sound fields in thefiber web12. Thefibers21 are orientated parallel to the runningdirection16. In order to use the reflected sound field more energetically, the inclined reflector is aligned in such a way, that the sound field will be thrown back in its incoming direction. Therewith the sound field returns again to thehorizontal reflector33 and then to the surface of thepower unit23. By means of a suitable wave length and the distances, a standing wave can be generated, whose antinode is in the layer of the fiber web.
The space between the[0111]wire2 and a—preferably extending over the whole width of the paper machine—traverse57 is filled with the transmittingmedia27. Theemitter22 and the inclined reflector are preferably arranged on a mountingdisc58. Therefore theswivel angle29 of the emitter and theswivel angle54 of the—here inclined—reflector33 are the same. Therefore only one align mechanism is necessary. Thetraverse57 is in this embodiment a mounting plane, on which other components can be arranged. The mountingdisc58 is supported swiveling at thetraverse57 by means of aholder60. Aseal59 prevents leakage of the transmittingmedia27 to the lower part of thehousing61, which has to be kept dry because ofelectric connectors46. Between the circle of the mounting disc58 (which is, for example, provided with a gear) and theholder60, an adjusting motor for the swivel angles29,54 can be positioned.
The device in FIG. 38 shows a improved version of the device in FIG. 37. In FIG. 37 the diameter of the[0112]holder60 is about three times larger than the width of the crossing sound fields in thefiber web12. By this, at thetraverse57 three mountingdiscs58 should be staggered in view over the runningdirection16 and over the working width. So one can realize a full treatment of a fiber web by sound fields in this section of the working width. By use of afurther reflector33—here shown vertically—another arrangement of theemitter22 is realizable. So the diameter of the holder can clearly be reduced. At a desired overlap51 (see FIG. 26) in FIG. 38, an arrangement of two rows with crossing sound fields is sufficient. So a two row arrangement is positionable between twoslats5 of a former. Although in FIG. 38 the distance drawn (in the course of the broken line=the middle of the wave beam) from the inclined to the horizontal reflector is different to the distance from the horizontal reflector to the surface of theemitter22, it is still possible to position an antinode in the plane of the fiber web by producing several antinodes (=standing waves) throughout the entire distance and by laying one of those antinodes in the plane of thefiber web12.
The indicated section line A-A in FIGS. 37 and 38 can be realized in the embodiments shown in FIGS. 39 and 40. The course of the[0113]sound field25 in FIGS. 37 and 38 was generated with the reflector in FIG. 39. In order to emphasize the course of theincoming sound field25 to theoutgoing sound field25, asmall swivel angle29 of the emitter, respectively asmall swivel angle54 of the reflector was assumed.
Because of the recess of the[0114]reflector33 of FIG. 40, a shifting of the reflection plane will occur. So that the reflection of a sound field takes place with the least energy loss, this recess must be filled with transmittingmedia27. Because the sound fields25 are able to press suspension water out of thewires1,2—respectively out of thefiber web12—anoutlet pipe44 would be advantageous, because in this way the suspension water can be drained. Additionally, the planes, which are facing to thewire1, represent aslat5 or a double slat9 with the aforementioned discussed advantages. Depending on the hydrodynamic given facts, the transmittingmedia27 will be added by asupply pipe43. Over the width of the paper machine there are possibly numerous ofsuch supply43 andoutlet pipes44, which can be used for rinsing off the recess and for cooling thereflector33.
At this point it should be mentioned that wires with narrow meshes—depending on the energy of a sound field field—can be so dense, that they too can function as a flat reflector.[0115]
In FIGS.[0116]41 to43 a further field of application of directed sound fields is shown. It was already explained that not only fibers, but also additives of paper production can be aligned with directed sound fields. FIGS.41 to43 show an application in a coating machine, but the described solution can also be used for the gluing of a fiber web in a size press.
In FIG. 41 a[0117]backing roll62 of a coating machine rotates in the indicated direction. So thefiber web12, which partly covers thebacking roll62, moves in the same direction. In acolor sump64 anapplicator roll63 is partly immersed into the color. Thefiber web12 runs through the nip between theapplicator roll63 and thebacking roll62 and takes the color from theapplicator roll63. As thebacking roll62 moves further along, the surplus color will be doctored from thefiber web12 by means of adoctor element67. Thedoctor element67 can be designed as a blade as well as a doctor rod.
If—as shown in FIG. 41—an[0118]emitter22 is arranged between thedoctor element67 and theapplicator roll63, the color particles will be aligned parallel to the wave fronts (in this case the fluid of the coating color is the transmittingmedia27 for the wave fronts) . Because of the large diameter of thebacking roll62, the color particles are essentially parallel to their surface and to the surface of thefiber web12. All color particles, which have a lamella like basic structure—as for example kaolin—after their parallel alignment will be laid in layers. If then the doctor element doctors the surplus color, so the parallel color particles slide better to each other. The shearing stress will obviously reduced. Because of this, a color film thickness might be possible to the thickness of only one color lamella. This saves coating color and technical effort of drying—respectively of energy. The color particles might also be orientated below thesurface65 of thecolor sump64 near to theapplicator63 by means of anemitter22. So theemitter22 between theapplicator roll63 and thedoctor element67 might be canceled. Theemitter22 in the color sump, furthermore, has the advantage that color lumps might be dissolved and/or the coating color might be degassed.
The[0119]backing roll62 and theapplicator roll63, in relation to theemitter22 shown, are reflectors. Additionally if the surfaces of thepower units23 are convex-shaped and they form a parallel gap with the rolls, so standing waves might be generated.
FIG. 42 shows the magnification of view A and the FIG. 43 shows the magnification of the view B. Both are parts of FIG. 41. These FIGS. don't need any further description, because they are self-explanatory in the context of the list of references.[0120]
List of References[0121] |
|
| 1 | wire |
| 2 | wire |
| 3 | headbox |
| 4 | curved forming shoe |
| 5 | ledge (slat) |
| 6 | skimmer |
| 7 | suction roll |
| 8 | suction box |
| 9 | double ledge (double slat) |
| 10 | forming roll |
| 11 | dragging blade |
| 12 | fiber web/suspension |
| 13 | foil |
| 14 | register roll |
| 15 | running direction in the plane of the drawing |
| 16 | running direction perpendicular to the plane of the |
| drawing |
| 17 | measured fiber orientation cross profile |
| 18 | desired fiber orientation cross profile |
| 19 | angle of the main fiber direction |
| 20 | main fiber direction |
| 21 | fiber |
| 22 | emitter |
| 23 | power unit |
| 24 | housing |
| 25 | sound field (acoustic field) |
| 26 | wave front |
| 27 | transmitting media |
| 28 | spreading direction of a sound field |
| 29 | swivel angle of the emitter |
| 30 | inclination of the emitter to the wire-normal |
| 31 | surface water (suspension water) |
| 32 | duplicator |
| 33 | reflector |
| 34 | reflector with parallel compensation |
| 35 | ring shaped motor stator |
| 36 | connecting cable |
| 37 | holder |
| 38 | ring shaped motor rotor |
| 39 | guide for the motor rotor |
| 40 | signature |
| 41 | deflection |
| 42 | aperture plate |
| 43 | supply pipe for the transmitting media |
| 44 | outlet pipe for the transmitting media |
| 45 | sliding surface |
| 46 | electric connector |
| 47 | sensor |
| 48 | sensor-measurement connection |
| 49 | standing wave |
| 50 | edge strip |
| 51 | overlap |
| 52 | swinging direction |
| 53 | writing head |
| 54 | swivel angle of the reflector |
| 55 | conduit |
| 56 | mounting element |
| 57 | traverse |
| 58 | mounting disc |
| 59 | seal |
| 60 | holder |
| 61 | housing |
| 62 | backing roll |
| 63 | applicator roll |
| 64 | color sump |
| 65 | surface of the color sump |
| 66 | coating film |
| 67 | doctor blade/element |
|