This application is a continuation in parts of application Ser. No. 09/621,238 filed on Jul. 26, 2000 by Brian Rennex.[0001]
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTIONThis invention, referred to as a running aid, relates to running braces and in particular to energy-efficient running braces. A running brace augments the effective spring constant of the leg by adding a resilient brace which supports the runner's weight in parallel with the leg. The invention combines the balance and control capabilities of the human foot/leg system with the strength and resilience features of a mechanical brace system.[0002]
Around 1890, four running brace patents were issued to Nicholas Yagn, a mechanical engineer in the army of the Emperor of Russia. The first two, U.S. Pat. Nos. 420,178 and 420,179, use bow springs, attached to the shoulder and the pelvis, respectively. The second of these incorporates a foot-lift means whereby the top of the bow spring can slide up a plate extending upwards from the runner's waist, during swing phase. However, there is no workable means to trigger this sliding. U.S. Pat. No. 438,830 was based on an unworkable design to fill a flexible tube with compressed gas to achieve a resilient brace. The fourth, U.S. Pat. No. 406,328 comprised telescopic springs and an unworkable telescopic release for leg lift in swing phase.[0003]
More recently, Chareire, U.S. Pat. No. 4,872,665, provides for a running brace comprising telescoping gas springs and a leg-lift means further comprising a ratchet joint. In principle, this invention should, in principle, work but it is exceedingly complex and it would be difficult and expensive to manufacture. In addition, it is doubtful that the trigger system for braking and releasing the rachet joint is versatile. Another drawback of the design is that compressive telescopic means necessarily entail friction losses, and this is especially the case with gas springs. Also, the travel of this running brace is limited by the requirements of telescopic overlap.[0004]
Dick, U.S. Pat. No. 5,016,869, discloses another complicated and heavy (50 lbs.) bipedal device which is intended to ensure a long travel and leg lift in swing phase, and it appears that the runner's weight is not supported in parallel with the runner's legs in which case the device is equivalent to a series-support running shoe and not a running brace. A number of links, cables and springs are incorporated in the involved design as to make the device rather cumbersome. Rennex disclosed an invention in U.S. Pat. No. 5,011,136 to provide for asymmetric leg-length travel in impact and thrust and to provide for high leg lift. It features a pair of telescopic springs and a trigger and ratchet system to achieve this asymmetry. The disadvantages of this design are its complexity and friction losses in the compressive telescopic design. Other provisions attempted to address the problem of optimized force curves to achieve high performance and high impact energies without Injury.[0005]
This inventor was not able to find prior art for harnesses specifically designed for coupling a running brace to the human body. One related example is disclosed by Petrofsky in U.S. Pat. No. 5,054,476, which uses support elements coming up the sides of a walker with cuffs attached at the thigh, waist , and armpit levels to give the walker support. This design does not provide for comfortable support for the brace loads of several gees needed for a running brace. A second example is disclosed by Spademan in U.S. Pat. No. 5,002,045, in which cuffs or straps attached to the limbs (or the waist) on either side of a joint are tightened as the limbs bend around that joint. The current patent is distinguished from both of these examples of prior art by virtue of the fact that the brace load is distributed in an adjustable manner over a substantial area of the human body for optimal comfort, and the automatic harness tightening is powered by the impact load on the brace, and not the relative motions of adjacent human limbs or elements. These features are adapted for the demanding requirements of running-brace support where load forces are large—several gees—and the human body is erect. Virtually all harnesses for high loads require the user to be sitting, and, hence, they are not useful for a running brace.[0006]
Regarding the prosthetic applications of the novel, tibia-located self-guiding springs of this invention, Phillips discloses in U.S. Pat. No. 5,458,656 a leaf spring guided by telescoping tubes and hingeably-attached to the top knee pylon. The drawback of this invention is that the telescoping guide is costly and the deflection of the single spring is limited. Kania discloses in U.S. Pat. No. 5,653,768 a pair of leaf springs fixedly attached to the top knee pylon and passing one through the other. The limitation of this design is that the spring deflection is limited because the leaf springs are not hingeably connected. Likewise Rappoport discloses in U.S. Pat. No. 5,509,936 a pair of leaf springs fixedly attached to the top knee pylon—with limited deflection. The advantage of the tibia spring in the current invention is that the vertical bow springs are hingeably attached, allowing optimization of the spring system in terms of ample deflection, constant force-curve, and low weight. Also, cost is reduced by eliminating the guide system.[0007]
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONThis “running aid” invention relates to passive (spring-actuated) running aids for ortheses, prostheses, and robots. The full invention is an leg ortheses or an energy-efficient running brace. It is a running brace which acts in parallel with a runner's leg to support the runner during stance phase and to capture all foot-impact energy, preferably with the optimal constant-force curve, for use to thrust said runner back into the air during toe-off. Moreover, several structural components of the full invention also have applications for prostheses, robots, and robotic exoskeletons to enhance human performance. These structural elements include a novel variable-angle knee-lock, a novel self-guiding/constant force bow spring, a novel pulley-based/constant-force bow spring, a novel brace/ankle system, a novel front/back brace leg which couples to the runner's pelvis in the front and back of his pelvis, novel means to ensure hyper-extension for “constrained hyper-extension” knee locks (referred to as self-locking), a novel and very cheap means to prevent “bounce-back” with self knee locks, and a novel load-tightening full harness. In addition to allowing faster running with less energy, the running brace protects the legs, joints and feet from impact injury since it eliminates impact forces above a safe level. The running brace is coupled to the runner via a body harness. This coupling must be located above the leg to allow it to rest as much as possible during the stance phase.[0008]
This running aid provides an essential improvement over prior art in the following ways. The force curve of the leg spring is optimal for quick support and maximum energy storage. Tile problem of a lock—to switch the running brace from a stiff spring mode during stance to free bending mode during swing phase—is circumvented with self-locking designs, and it is solved with either a novel variable-angle knee lock or a slider lock. The problem of leg-length asymmetry is overcome with a shaped brace foot, and the comfort problem is addressed with a novel load-tightening pelvic/body harness which distributes the impact load over a substantial portion of the body above the knees.[0009]
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGSFIG. 1 is a schematic side view of the running aid generic to the various embodiments of the invention.[0010]
FIG. 2 shows side views of series bow springs for use in the first embodiment of the invention.[0011]
FIG. 3 shows side and top views of perpendicular-bow self-guiding springs for use in the first embodiment of the invention.[0012]
FIG. 4 shows a side view of a tibia perpendicular-spring/brace-foot assembly for use in the first embodiment of the invention.[0013]
FIG. 5 shows side views of a tibia perpendicular-spring/hinged-brace-foot assembly.[0014]
FIG. 6 is a side view of the decoupled-bow version of the running aid according to the second embodiment of the invention.[0015]
FIG. 7 is a front view of the decoupled-bow version of the running aid according to the second embodiment of the invention.[0016]
FIG. 8 is a side view of the running aid according to the third embodiment of the invention showing a gas spring with a reservoir.[0017]
FIG. 9 is a side view of the support part of a self-locking knee mechanism of the running aid according to the fourth embodiment of the invention.[0018]
FIG. 10 is a side view of the[0019]4-bar foot-lift assembly for maintaining clearance of the brace foot above the ground during swing phase according to the fourth embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 11 is a front cross-sectional view of the running aid according to the fifth embodiment of the invention showing the variable-angle knee lock.[0020]
FIG. 12 is a side cross-sectional view of the running aid according to the fifth embodiment of the invention showing the shaft/collar assembly of the variable-angle knee lock.[0021]
FIG. 13 is a side cross-sectional view of the running aid according to the fifth embodiment of the invention showing the shaft and the collar of the variable-angle knee lock.[0022]
FIG. 14 is a side cross-sectional view of the running aid according to the fifth embodiment of the invention showing rotation of the shaft with respect to the collar of the variable-angle knee lock.[0023]
FIG. 15 is a side view of the running aid according to the fifth embodiment of the invention showing a damper for use with the variable-angle knee lock.[0024]
FIG. 16 is a side view of the running aid according to the fifth embodiment of the invention showing a tibia lock-release for use with the variable-angle knee lock.[0025]
FIG. 17 is a back view of the cable system allowing the use of a single bow spring in the sixth embodiment of the running aid.[0026]
FIG. 18 shows schematic views of the full harness for the running aid.[0027]
FIG. 19 is a side view of a generic mechanical design for a mechanical load-tightener used in the harness for the running aid.[0028]
FIG. 20 shows examples of compressible woven harnesses for load-tightening sleeves of the harness for the running aid.[0029]
FIG. 21 is a side view of an overlap double-pulley load tightener which is an example of a mechanical load-tightening cuff used in the harness for the running aid.[0030]
FIG. 22 is a side view of a bent-lever load tightener, a jamming load tightener and an inward-force load tightener of the harness for the running aid.[0031]
FIG. 23 is a side view of a combination mechanical/weave load-tightener of the harness for the running aid.[0032]
FIG. 24 is a side view of an arm load-bearing harness for the running aid.[0033]
FIG. 25 shows a schematic front view of a load-equalizer stay tree which distributes the brace load over various parts of the harness for the running aid.[0034]
FIG. 26 shows an adjustable harness for the running aid.[0035]
FIG. 27 shows a side view of a generic brace leg with a circular brace foot, demonstrating graphically how well the brace foot prevents vertical travel of the runner's center of mass throughout stance.[0036]
FIG. 28 shows a hyperlocker mechanism to guarantee hyper-extension of the self-locking knee mechanism of the fourth embodiment of the invention of FIG. 9.[0037]
FIG. 29 shows a slider for changing the length of a running aid according to the seventh embodiment of the invention.[0038]
FIG. 30 shows a full-stance brace-foot trigger for locking a slider during stance.[0039]
FIG. 31 shows a foot-coupling guaranteed release mechanism for release of the slider lock at toe-off.[0040]
FIG. 32 shows a simple-slider running brace according to the eighth embodiment of the invention, wherein the knee pivot is no longer used.[0041]
FIG. 33 shows a means to combine an active power source with a passive spring according to the ninth embodiment of the invention.[0042]
FIG. 34 shows two lockable hydraulic sliders with two and three telescopic members.[0043]
FIG. 35 shows a knee pivot locked by a lockable hydraulic slider according to the eleventh embodiment of the invention.[0044]
FIG. 36 shows a self-hyper-locker for guaranteeing hyper-extension at foot strike.[0045]
FIG. 37 shows a “hyper-extension bounce back” prevention means for prevention of folding of a hyper-extending knee lock at heel strike.[0046]
FIG. 38 shows a front/back brace leg in which the pelvic coupling is made directly behind and in front of the runner's ischial tuberosity (buttock) rather on the side of the hip.[0047]
FIG. 39 shows a front/back pack extension for comfortable and optimal pack load support.[0048]
FIG. 40 shows a four-bar knee joint.[0049]
FIG. 41 is a schematic side view of the bow shoe showing a low-eccentricity knee-joint straightener.[0050]
DESCRIPTIONFIG. 1 is a schematic side view of running[0051]aid2 withrunner1 shown in dashed lines to indicate the approximate location and extent of the various elements of the invention with respect to the runner who wears the invention. Runningaid2 comprisesharness3 and twobrace legs9, one on the outside of each leg ofrunner1. Eachbrace leg9 supportsrunner1 when her adjacent foot is in contact with the ground during running, i.e. during the stance phase, as distinguished from the swing phase when that leg is not in contact with the ground.Harness3 is attached to the runner's pelvis, and each brace-foot assembly8 is attached to the adjacent runner's foot. Since runningaid2 supports the weight ofrunner1 in parallel with her leg, she can rest her leg during the stance phase of the running stride cycle. Since runningaid2 can act as a spring to absorb the impact energy of running and to thrustrunner1 back into the air during leg thrust,runner1 can both exert less energy while running and avoid in juries related to the impact of running. Later, each design component will be discussed in detail, but, first, here is a quick overview.
In order to be able to swing a brace leg forward and/or run uphill, a swing-phase length-change means is required. One option is[0052]knee pivot6 of FIG. 1; another option is simple-slider running aid561 of FIG. 32. In FIG. 1, thigh-link4 is rotatably attached to harness3 on the top and toknee pivot6 on the bottom.Spring mechanism5 is incorporated into thigh-link4 in the second embodiment of the invention shown in FIG. 6, but is may be located elsewhere, e.g., on the back ofrunner1 in the sixth embodiment of FIG. 17 or in thetibia link7 as an option of the second embodiment of FIG. 6. Or, there can be no spring at all in this running aid invention, in which case the running aid simply provides support and in which case the design features in the discussion of FIG. 5 are crucial to provide the brace leg/foot length asymmetry to match the brace support to the runner's leg action. This “no-spring” variation will be referred to as the tenth embodiment of the invention. As will be seen in the more detailed description of the second embodiment in FIG. 6, thigh-link4 includes a guide means which constrains an element rotatably connected to harness3 to slide with respect to an element connected to knee pivot, under the action of bucky-bow spring mechanism10—to deliver an impulse torunner1.Knee pivot6 connects thigh-link assembly4 andtibia link7, and it incorporates the brace-link self-locking mechanism to be detailed later. The bottom oftibia link7 is attached to bracefoot8 which contacts the ground. Each of these components has one or more specific functions essential to easy, efficient running. These functions will next be previewed in a general sense to prepare the reader for the more detailed discussion of the drawings.
[0053]Harness3 must couple runningaid2 torunner1 above his leg to ensure that runningaid2 acts in parallel with his leg. Since the g-force of running can be2-3 g's, there is significantly more weight onharness3 than would be the case with bicycle riding, for example. Since conventional harnesses actually require the user to sit, in which case most of the weight is borne by the backs of the thighs and the back of the waist loop, these conventional harnesses cannot be used for the running aid harness, as one cannot run and sit at the same time. Also, conventional, “above the knee” orthotics, which comprise a rigid, tapered thigh socket and a lip to receive the weight of the ischial tuberosity at the base of the buttocks, receive perhaps 40% of the load in the thigh tapered region. Since the thighs of able-legged runners change shape due to muscular and tendon activity, these conventional, thigh-socket orthotics cannot comfortably be used for runningaid2. Therefore, the design discussion forharness3 presents a means to spread the brace load over a substantial portion of the body. The area of harness support indicated in FIG. 1 extends from the lower thigh to the chest, but it may also include the arms and shoulders.
[0054]Spring mechanism5 should giverunner1 virtually instantaneous support. The optimal force curve is achieved with a bow spring with a buckling force curve in which the force changes virtually instantaneously to the critical-load value and continues at close to that value as the bow bends further. In the second embodiment of the invention of FIGS. 6 and 7, this buckling force curve is achieved by pulling the bow ends straight together. Since pulleys are used in this design, it is straightforward to achieve a mechanical advantage which allows, first, reduced bow flexing—an important feature since there is a tradeoff between flexibility and strength—and, second, a de facto changing of gears. Another advantage of the pulley/cable aspect ofspring mechanism5, which becomes bucky-bow spring mechanism10 in FIG. 6, is that it can be located anywhere, e.g., on the sides of the legs, behind the legs, or behind the back. Also, a single bucky-bow spring mechanism can be used for both legs ofrunner1. Although a variety of spring systems, such a helical springs with longitudinal, “piston-like” guides, may be used in this invention, the bucky-bow has the distinct advantage of the buckling force curve.
[0055]Knee pivot6 allows the folding of thigh-link4 andtibia link7. This, in turn, allowsrunner1 to high-kick his leg during swing phase, when the leg is not in ground contact. However, there must be some way to lockknee pivot6 during the stance phase, when the leg is in ground contact. The strength requirements of this locking are very high due to the leverage aboutknee pivot6. And, sincerunner1 may sometimes land on a bent knee, e.g., when running uphill, this locking must work whenthigh link4 and tibia link7 have not yet rotated to be aligned. These lock-design requirements have been the major design hurdle for running-brace prior art. The current invention circumvents this locking problem with a self-locking knee designs of FIGS. 9 and 36, and it solves it with the variable-angle knee lock of FIGS.11-14 and with the hydraulic locks of FIGS. 32 and 35.
The purpose of brace-[0056]foot8 is to give runningaid2 the same length asymmetry as is the case for the legs ofrunner1. The term length asymmetry refers to the fact that the effective length of the leg/foot system of runner1 (e.g., the distance between the hip pivot and the effective point of contact of her foot with the ground) is several inches shorter for landing (heel-down) than for taking off (toe-off). This length asymmetry results from the presence of the human foot and ankle, and it serves to reduce the leg/foot angle of heel-down relative to that of toe-off, thereby improving running energy efficiency. If a running aid does not feature this same length asymmetry, the timing of brace thrust will be too early for optimal, efficient brace thrust. The just-mentioned self-locking requires that brace-foot8 be rotatably attached to the runner's foot behind her heel. The drawback then is that brace-foot8 may rotate so that its front portion will drop below the level of the runner's toe, leading to a tripping hazard. To avoid tripping, the brace foot must have the design of FIG. 10 to lift the front ofbrace foot8 during swing phase.
This completes the overview. Now the detailed components of the invention will be described. FIG. 2[0057]ais a side view showing guidedbow spring426. This first embodiment utilizes “series” bow springs which are almost straight when unloaded and which are loaded by pushing the ends of the bow springs toward each other—to achieve a buckling or constant spring force curve (versus deflection). Guidedbow spring426 andspring guide435 compriseupper guide438 which is slidingly corrected tolower guide436.Upper guide438 is rigidly connected totop bowholder428, andlower guide436 is rigidly connected tobottom bowholder430. One or more mini-bows434 are hingeably connected between bottom bowholder430 andtop bowholder428. Accordingly, guidedbow spring426 is located in series withthigh link4 and/or tibia link7 (see FIG. 1), and the runner's impact force forcesupper guide438 to slide down intolower guide436 and compress mini-bows434. In like manner, the design of FIG. 2bis the same as that of FIG. 2aexcept that there are two spring guides435 located on either side ofmini-bows434.
FIG. 3 shows top and side views of perpendicular-bow self-guiding bows[0058]444. FIG. 3ashows a top view and FIG. 3ba side view of T-shaped perpendicular-bow system440 in which one or more mini-bows434 are oriented perpendicular to one or moreother mini-bows434. The rationale is to take advantage of the resistance to bending in the plane of the wide dimension of a bow. In this case and in general, mini-bows434 are substantially wider than they are thick. Sincemini-bows434 are hingeably attached to end-plates448 viahinges14, if only one mini-bow434 stack (all parallel to each other) is used, then end-plates448 can rotate freely with one degree of freedom. As soon as another single one or stack ofmini-bows434 is connected between end-plates448 with an orthogonal or a substantially orthogonal orientation, eachorthogonal mini-bow434 resists rotation of theorthogonal mini-bows434 in the orthogonal degree of rotational freedom. The result is that T-shaped perpendicular-bow system440 resists tilting of one end-plate448 with respect to the other on the opposite end, and this gives a substantially self-guiding spring system. Asmini-bows434 bow over considerably, this self-guiding, or ability to resist non-axial loads is compromised, but in some applications it eliminates the need for a guide system longitudinal to the perpendicular-bow self-guidingbow444. FIG. 3cshows square-shaped perpendicular-bow system445 in which one or more stacks ofmini-bows434 are oriented to form a rectangular configuration, and FIG. 3dshows triangle-shaped perpendicular-bow system446 in which one or more stacks ofmini-bows434 are oriented to form a triangular configuration—the combination of which yields a substantially orthogonal configuration. These are just a few of the many configurations possible for perpendicular-bow self-guidingbow444.
The advantages of perpendicular-bow self-guiding[0059]bow444 include the following. First and most importantly, a significant travel, i.e., 2-6 inches, of spring compression can be achieved with a bow the length of the thigh and/or tibia of the runner—due to the possibility of using verythin mini-bows434. Second, it is easy to manufacture, and the total spring stiffness can easily be varied to “tune the brace for a particular runner. Third, this ease in “changing gears” allows one to use a gear-changing mechanism to engage a variable number of mini-bows to “tune” a running aid for an individual or to “change gears” while running by utilizing a mechanism to engage a variable number of min-bows434.
FIG. 4 shows a side view of a tibia perpendicular-spring/brace-[0060]foot assembly25 for use in the first embodiment of the invention. Tibia perpendicular-spring/brace-foot assembly25 can also be used for below-the-knee prostheses, the only difference being that tipper-tibia pylon13 connects to the runner's stump instead of to the upper portion oftibia link7 of FIG. 1. The function is the same, namely to absorb and return impact energy of running. Upper-tibia pylon13 is rigidly attached to tipper-tibia end-plate12, and bracefoot8 is rigidly attached to brace-foot end-plate11. Front bows16 bow to the front, side bows15 bow to the outside, and back bows17 bow to the back—of the runner, and all are hingeably attached to upper-tibia end plate12 and brace-foot end plate12. It is still possible to use the configuration of FIG. 3csince both stacks of side bows15, one on either side of the rectangle, can bow to the outside. This is necessary so as to not interfere with the runner's other foot. Tibia perpendicular-spring/brace-foot assembly25 absorbs and returns the runner's impact energy without need for a separate, longitudinal guide system because of the self-guiding capability described above. Notice that the bottom ofbrace foot8 is curved. The shape of this curve is critical to optimize running performance, and this point will be explained in the discussion of the next figure. FIG. 4bshows taperedbow35 which can be used for any of the bow springs discussed herein. Its purpose is to make the rise of the bow force curve to the constant buckling value more gradual in case this is needed for comfort concerns. The amount of taper controls the force curve very precisely and easily.
FIG. 5 shows side views of tibia perpendicular-spring/hinged-brace-[0061]foot assembly27. FIG. 5bshows the landing at heel-down, and FIG. 5ashows the toe-off at take-off. Tibia perpendicular-spring/hinged-brace-foot assembly27 is now hingeably connected to bracefoot8 via brace-foot end-plate11, rigidly attached to brace-foot end mount18, andankle pivot23. Brace-foot return spring22 tilts forward bracefoot8 against brace-footrear stop19 in swing phase. At heel-down brace heel24 impacts the ground. During stance, as the runner continues forward, tibia perpendicular-spring/hinged-brace-foot assembly27 rotates forward, like an inverted pendulum, until brace-foot end mount18 impinges brace-foot front stop20—at which time brace-foot8 rocks forward over brace forefoot curved bottom21 until toe-of. Regarding the below-knee prosthesis application, the advantage of this design is that all of the impact energy is stored in perpendicular-spring/hinged-brace-foot assembly27 with its constant-force curve, and this energy is returned to thrust at toe-off at the time when it is best utilized. Prior art prostheses which store energy in heel flat springs and flexing bow shins either give back the energy too soon, or they give it back with a linear force curve which does not couple well with the runner's push-off action. That is, the spring force is too weak at the end of take-off. Whereas, for a constant-force spring, the spring force is still optimally high at toe-off. Also, by using hinged, multiple bows, the spring deflection can easily be as large and optimal as is needed. Finally, perpendicular-spring/hinged-brace-foot assembly27 can support sufficient torque for this application without need for a telescoping-tube guide system.
FIG. 5[0062]cshows a side view of tibia perpendicular-spring/rigid-brace-foot assembly29 which differs from the design of FIGS. 5aand5bin that brace-foot end-plate11 is now rigidly attached to bracefoot8. The intention here is to reap the benefits of a long brace foot, but this means that the pitch torque (in the front-back-vertical plane) must be resisted by the prosthesis. The shape of rigid-foot curved bottom33 is designed to minimize this torque. The design benefits then are that the landing and take-off angles of the runner's leg are optimized, but these benefits must be traded off with the tolerable pitch torque. For the running aid application,brace foot8 is even more important—to match the length asymmetry of a running brace to the natural length asymmetry of the runner's leg/foot system which results from the greater length of the toe-to-hip-joint distance at toe-off than the length of the heel-to-lip-joint distance at heel-down. Again, the design goal of length asymmetry for the running aid and the specific asymmetry achieved depend on the precise shape of the bottom ofbrace foot8. The length ofbrace foot8 controls the amount of length asymmetry and the precise shape controls the rate (which should be steady) of forward motion of the effective contact point rate, i.e., the point around which there is no net torque due to the foot force—between the ground and the bottom ofbrace foot8. That is at toe-off, brace forefoot curved bottom21 acts as a rolling pivot to limit the pitch torque on runningaid2 in FIG. 1. The design of the shape ofbrace foot8 to achieve length asymmetry and to optimize performance during the rollover from heel to toe is referred to herein as the weight transfer structure.
FIG. 6 is a side view of running[0063]aid2 from FIG. 1 according to the second embodiment of the invention; FIG. 7 is a front view of the same. Here, the bow is decouple from the support. Only one side ofbrace leg9 is shown in each figure, andharness center line136 indicates the center ofharness3 in FIG. 7. Runningbrace harness3 shown in FIG. 1 is not shown in FIG. 6, but it is attached to hip-pivot rim26 in the actual invention.Runner1 is shown in FIG. 6 as a dashed line.
[0064]Hip link112 is rotatably attached to harness3 viahip pivot28 mounted in hip-pivot block116. There are three senses of rotation for pivots, with respect torunner1. “Pitch” refers to rotation about the side-to-side axis, “roll”—rotation about the front-to-back axis, and “yaw”—rotation about the vertical axis. Hip pivot cannot allow roll because of self-lockingknee mechanism121, to be discussed below.Hip pivot28 must allow pitch so that the runner's leg can swing back and forth, and it may optionally allow roll to allow knee turn-out—forrunner1 to change direction.Hip link112 is a support member, and it serves to house bucky-bow spring mechanism10 and to slidingly connect withthigh link4 which slides along bearings within or besidehip link112. Bucky-bow spring mechanism10 comprises pulley block104 to which are mountedinner pulley106 and outer pulley108 (rigidly attached to inner pulley106). It further comprisesbow spring100 and bowstrings102 which extend from either end ofbow spring100 aroundinner pulley106. Drawstrings103 then extend around outer108 to be caught byspring catch118 upon impact, asthigh link4 is forced upward throughhip link112. Bucky-bow spring mechanism10 further comprises thigh-link constraint120 which allowsbow spring100 to bow, but which constrains the center ofbow spring100 to move straight downhip link112.
The function of bucky-[0065]bow spring mechanism10 is to allowbow spring100 to absorb the runner's impact energy asthigh link4 slides up throughhip link112, catchingdrawstring103.Drawstring103 then turnsouter pulley108 which turnsinner pulley106, pulling tie ends ofbow spring100 together. The mechanical advantage achieved with this double pulley system allows a greater travel ofdraw string103, and, hence, of bucky-bow spring mechanism10, for a given flexing ofbow spring100. This allows a more lightweight bow for a given strength. For example, abow spring 30 inches long and between one and two lbs in weight can give a constant force of 400 lbs with a draw-string103 travel of six inches (same as the human center-of-mass travel). The use of pulleys also permits the possibility of changing tile stiffness ofspring assembly5, which is analogous to changing gears on a bicycle. This change can be done simply with a conventional gear mechanism—to change the load-carrying pulley strings from one pulley to another. Finally,bow spring100 can be inverted and attached tothigh link4, so thathip link112 pulls down ondraw string103, but it is preferable to have the weight of the lower brace support onhip link112.
In order for[0066]spring assembly5 to carry out this function of bow-loading, self-lockingknee mechanism121 must be locked. That is,tibia link7 must be loaded so that it exerts clockwise torque aboutknee pivot6, causing thigh-link constraint120 to impinge against tibia-link constraint122—in which case self-lockingknee mechanism121 is self-locked. Looking now atbrace foot8,tibia link7 transmits the impact load to the ground via its rotatable (pitch) connection withknee pivot6 on the top and its rigid attachment to bracefoot8.Heel pivot130 connectsbrace foot8 to the runner's foot behind her heel guaranteeing the release of self-lockingknee mechanism121, to be discussed with FIG. 9.
FIG. 8[0067]ais a side view ofgas spring30 withgas reservoir34 which is the third embodiment of the invention. This combination can be used to achieve a substantially constant spring force curve. This substantially constant force curve is achieved by pre-pressurizing the gas to get a high initial pressure or spring force and a low force-curve slope asgas spring46 deflects. A working definition of a constant force curve is that the average force over the range of deflection is greater than 70% of the maximum value during that deflection. For example, if a force curve is linear, the average force is 50% of the maximum. Increasing the pre-pressure (unloaded) value and the reservoir volume results in an increase of this average force value with respect to the maximum force value, but there must be a trade-off with weight. Tile running impact force compressesgas spring30 aschamber cylinder40 slides down aroundpiston38.Gas line32 transmits the pressure togas reservoir34 located abovelip pivot rim26. Asingle gas reservoir34 can be used for both gas springs on both legs. The preferred gas in gas springs30 is air, but it may be another gas.
FIG. 8[0068]bis a schematic side view ofgas pump36 for replenishing lost gas inpressurized gas spring30.Gas pump36 is mounted next togas spring30 so that, whengas spring30 is compressed, the gas pressure inpressure chamber56 increases aspump piston46 andgas seal48 are pushed down bypiston shaft50. When the pressure inpressure chamber56 exceeds the pressure ingas spring30 to which it is connected viafeeder tube60, gas leaks throughcheck valve52 intogas spring30. If the pressure there gets too high,pressure release valve54 releases the pressure. On the return stroke,inlet hole58 allows gas intopressure chamber56 for the next pressure stroke.
FIG. 9 is a side view of the support part of self-locking[0069]knee mechanism121 of the running aid according to the fourth embodiment of the invention. It simplifies the picture of how this self-locking is achieved by showing only the components needed for this demonstration. The purpose of self-lockingknee mechanism121 is to ensure that the support elements, thigh-link assembly4 and tibia link7 are locked straight during stance phase and free to bend aboutknee pivot6 during swing phase. As the runner's leg extends before foot strike, these support elements approach the straight orientation shown FIG. 9a, from the folded orientation shown in FIG. 9b.
Self-locking[0070]knee mechanism121 is shown in FIG. 9c, and its purpose is to ensure that thigh-link constraint120 and tibia-link constraint122 close completely before foot strike for the self-locking to occur. This closing can also be referred to as the hyper-extension force.Posts146 are rigidly attached totibia link7 andthigh link4;center post150 is rigidly attached to knee-pivot block152.Knee spring148 is attached toposts146 and passes overcenter post150, it acts to close thigh-link constraint120 and tibia-link constraint122 completely, and it is strong enough to ensure this closing, but weak enough to allow the runner's lifting leg to foldknee pivot6 at toe-off. Note that by shorteningposts146 and/orcenter post150 it is possible to reduce the hyper-extension force to any desired value after the knee pivot has folded beyond a particular angle, thereby reducing the force that the runner must exert in high kick.
At heel-down, the heel portion of[0071]aid foot8 strikes the ground at the location ofheel arrow143, andheel centerline142 indicates the line of force betweenhip pivot28 and the ground. Sinceheel centerline142 passes to the left ofknee pivot6, this impact force pushes thigh-link constraint120 and tibia-link constraint122 together, and self-lockingknee mechanism121 remains locked. Asaid foot8 rolls over forward until toe-off from the location oftoe arrow145, the force curve indicated bytoe centerline144 still passes to the left ofknee pivot6, andknee pivot6 remains locked. immediately at toe-off, the runner lifts her foot which is rotatably connected toheel pivot130, at which time the force curve passes to the right ofknee pivot6, as indicated by foot-couplingpivot center line140—between foot-coupling pivot arrow141 andhip pivot28—causing tibia link7 to fold aboutknee pivot6 as seen FIG. 9b. The advantage of self-lockingknee mechanism121 is that it circumvents the problem of a knee-pivot lock, which is a very difficult problem because of the weight and strength constraints in view of the large torques involved. This self-locking can also be achieved with a foot-aid coupling in front of the runner's foot, but this approach is not as convenient. Also, the device can be prevented from locking at all by walking on very bent knees, e.g., up a steep hill or up stairs, or a mechanical switch can be incorporated into self-lockingknee mechanism121 to prevent thigh-link constraint120 from approaching close enough to tibia-link constraint122 for the self-locking to take effect, thereby allowing the runner to walk or climb a steep hill.
FIG. 10 is a side view of[0072]4-bar foot-lift assembly85 for maintaining clearance ofaid foot4 above the ground during swing phase. Foot-lift link86 hingeably connects the front ofaid foot8 viatoe pivot88 to thigh-link extension87 via foot-lift pivot89. Thigh-link extension87 extends rigidly fromthigh link4. Whenknee pivot6 folds, thigh-link extension87lifts aid foot8 via foot-lift link86, thereby preventingaid foot8 from dropping below the runner's foot and tripping him. FIGS. 10a,10band10cdisplay4-bar foot-lift assembly85 at various degrees of folding and straightening. FIG. 10ashows that both foot-lift pivot89 andknee pivot6 have straightened to hyper-extend and lock against foot-pivot constraints91 and tibia-link constraint122 and thigh-link constraint120, thereby ensuring that both foot-lift link86 and tibia link7 transmit the running impact load to aidfoot8. And, whenheel pivot130lifts aid foot8 and releases the locking of both foot-lift pivot89 andknee pivot6, the runner can high kick his foot behind him. FIG. 10dshowsthigh link4 and thigh-link extension87 as a single rigid element. Both foot-lift pivot89 andknee pivot6 require closing mechanisms ( not shown here for clarity) to ensure that they close at heel down, such as the spring system shown with self-lockingknee mechanism121 in FIG. 9c.
FIG. 11 is a front cross-sectional view of variable-[0073]angle knee lock61 which is a more versatile and sophisticated alternative to self-lockingknee mechanism121 of FIG. 9 and which is the fifth embodiment of the invention. The idea behind this device is to make a shaft/collar system which turns freely when loaded on one side and which locks very strongly when loaded on the other side. By interleaving a number of strips, alternating between strips attached to the shaft and strips attached to the collar, it is possible to magnify the friction force by the number of interfaces between alternating strips. This means that a very large lock force can easily be achieved with a number, perhaps five or ten, of very thin, light, cheap metal circumferential strips78. Also, the goal of this design is to load the lock radially rather than axially—as is done with conventional car disk brakes. This radial loading eliminates the need for a force re-direction mechanism.
FIG. 11[0074]ashows hollow shaft62 (optionally hollow) and splitcollar69 assembled together. The top portion ofhollow shaft62 andupper collar70 form a cylindrical bearing surface so that whenhollow shaft62 pushes up againstupper collar70, they rotate freely. FIG. 11cshowsshaft boss64 which is attached to the lower portion ofhollow shaft62 by boss screws67.Boss spacers68 interleaf withcircumferential strips78—all of which extend circumferentially around the bottom portion ofhollow shaft62. This circumferential extension can been seen in FIG. 12 which is a side view of variable-angle knee lock61. Boss screws67 tightenboss stack plate77 againstboss spacers68 interleaved withcircumferential strips78 and againstshaft boss64. Thus,circumferential strips78 are fixedly attached to hollowshaft62.
FIG. 11[0075]bshowslower collar71 withcircumferential strips78—both of which are attached toshaft boss64 byboss screw67. The attachment ofcircumferential strips78 tolower collar71 is accomplished in a similar manner to their attachment to hollowshaft62. Collar screws73 tightencollar stack plate66 againstcollar spacers79 interleaved withcircumferential strips78 and againstlower collar71.
FIG. 11[0076]ashows in assembly that alternatingcircumferential strips78 attached toshaft boss64 andlower collar71 interleaf between each other. Thus, when lower collar pushes up againsthollow shaft62, a friction force is exerted between these alternatingcircumferential strips78 attached toshaft boss64 andlower collar71. Specifically, this upward pushing causes the portion oflower collar71 radially external to the interleaf region to compress the stack of interleavedcircumferential strips78 againstshaft boss64, thereby lockinghollow shaft62 from rotating inlower collar71. The radial dimensions ofcollar recess74 andshaft boss64 are chosen to ensure that this compression and locking is unimpeded. Again, the frictional force of this device is proportional to the number ofcircumferential strips78 and can easily be magnified to a very large value.
The circumferential ranges of extension of[0077]lower collar71 andshaft boss64 can been seen in FIG. 12 which is an assembly side view of variable-angle knee lock61 and in FIG. 13 which shows the shaft and collar components separately. This particular choice of angular ranges gives a locking range of over 70 degrees which is more than adequate for the range of bent-knee angles needed for natural running, as can be seen in FIGS. 14aand14bwhich show the rotation oflower collar71 aroundshaft62.Lower collar71 is fixedly attached totibia shaft7, andshaft62 is fixedly attached tothigh link4, Again, the upward force oflower collar71 onshaft62 will cause locking over the range oftibia7 rotation shown in FIG. 14. Sincethigh link4 and tibia link7 are approaching being aligned whenever foot impact occurs, it is likely that the jarring force transmitted uptibia link7 tolower collar71 will be sufficient to lock variable-angle knee lock61, as is the case with prior-art, above-the-knee prostheses. If more force is needed, a foot-contact trigger can be used to initiate the locking of variable-angle knee lock61. For example, a “brake cable” could transmit foot-impact force to close split-collar69 by havingcollar attachments75 provide a sliding connection betweenlower collar71 andupper collar70 rather than a fixed attachment provided bycollar attachment75. It should be understood that if the bearing surfaces are located on the bottom side rather than the top side,thigh link4 can be attached to splitcollar69 and tibia link7 to hollowshaft62. Finally, variable-angle knee lock61 allows uphill running, and it results in an effective gear changing because the spring action is not as aligned with the thrust action when variable-angle knee lock61 locks at a more bent position.
FIG. 15 is a side view of variable-[0078]angle knee lock61showing damper82 for use with variable-angle knee lock61. When tibia link7 swings forward just before heel strike, it is important to prevent it from over-hyper-extending and from bouncing back off a stop. This is accomplished withdamper82 fixedly attached todamper arm80 fixedly attached tothigh link4. FIG. 15bshows tibia link7 swinging forward in the direction indicated byarrow84 and approaching the straight-leg position. FIG. 15 a shows thatdamper82 absorbs the momentum oftibia7 and stops it near the straight position. It should be understood that variable-angle knee lock61 can optionally utilize a device to ensure that it opens to a straight orientation at heel-strike such as that shown in FIG. 9c. Also, since variable-angle knee lock61 locks over a range of angles, a simple damper such as a foam, gel or bladder can be used. This is an advantage over conventional knee locks used ill above-the-knee prostheses which use expensive and sophisticated hydraulic mechanisms to prevent bounce back over a range of gaits. And, it should be understood that variable-angle knee lock61 has applications in robots and above-the-knee prostheses. Also, there are other ways obvious to one of ordinary skill in the machining and fabrication arts to construct variable-angle knee lock61—that do not depart from the device intent to radially load interleaving strips so as to magnify considerably the pivot lock force.
FIG. 16 is a side view of[0079]4-bar foot-lift assembly85 showing tibia lock-release93 for use with variable-angle knee lock61. The purpose is to ensure knee-lock release at toe-off as was done in the example of self-lockingknee mechanism121 shown in FIG. 9. In this case the hyper-extended, constrained pivot lock is located near the middle of what was tibialink7 in earlier figures. The4-bar foot-lift assembly85 is the same as that shown in FIG. 10, but now tibia-link7 comprises lower tibia-link96,tibia pivot92 and upper tibia-link94. The ends of upper tibia-link94 and lower tibia-link96 connected totibia pivot92 havedouble constraints90 which serve to locktibia pivot92 on the hyper-extending side and to limit the folding oftibia pivot92 on the other side. The lifting ofaid foot8 by the runner's foot via heel-pivot130 breaks the hyper-extended locking action of bothtibia pivot92 and foot-lift pivot89 as shown in FIG. 16b. FIG. 16cshows a blow-up of the components oftibia lock release93.
FIG. 17 is a back view of[0080]cable system200 which allows the use ofsingle bow spring202 in the sixth embodiment of the running aid invention. That is, one bow, located behind the runner's back, is used for either leg instead of two (one on each leg) as shown in FIG. 6. This embodiment requires a system of pulleys to direct the force ofsingle bow spring202 to the runner's sides. For clarity, only the pulleys are shown, and the support attachments of the various pulleys are mentioned in this specification.Thigh link4 transmits the impact force by pulling upward with pulley catch118 onpulley cable210 which passes around side pulley205 (rotatably mounted tothigh link4; mounting not shown).Pulley cable210 next transmits the force back to back-pulley206, mounted onback support208, and then up to up-pulley204, also mounted to backsupport208. Actually,side pulley205 will be directly in front ofback pulley206, but they are shown slightly offset here for clarity. Next, the force is transmitted toouter pulley108 and toinner pulley106, which are mounted behind the runner to backsupport208, which is rigidly attached tohip pivot rim26.Single bow spring202 is connected to and interacts withouter pulley108 in a manner similar to that shown withbow spring100 in FIG. 6, the difference being thatsingle bow spring202 can absorb impact force from the brace elements on either or both sides.
FIG. 18 shows[0081]full harness300 for the running aid with the front view on the left and the side view on the right. In the front view,runner1 is shown in dashed lines, and the coupling betweenrunner1 andfull harness300 is made viapelvic rim26 from FIG. 6.Full harness300 can be subdivided intothigh harness302,pelvic harness304, waist harness306, andchest harness308, and each of these can be further subdivided intomultiple cuffs310. Later, a figure will show a means to take some of the brace load on the arms ofrunner1, as well.Stays312 are rigidly attached topelvic rim26 and extend upward and downward from it to support the elements offull harness300 viacords314. Only the portion ofpelvic rim26 at either side is shown for clarity, but it encirclesrunner1. Only thosestays312 on either side are shown for clarity, but there may be multiple stays aroundpelvic rim26.Cords314 can independently support each cuff to better distribute the brace load along the length offull harness300, and there may be one ormore cuffs310 in each harness subdivision. Finally, only a portion of thefull harness300 shown may be needed and used in this invention.
One very important feature of this extensive harness is that the harness portions which support and upward pull can be tightened down against the harness portions which support a downward pull. For example in FIG. 18, waist harness[0082]306 can be cinched down tothigh harness302 with straps, and vice versa. This allows the compliance of the underlying runner's flesh to shear to be reduced substantially.
It may be possible to comfortably support a runner with harnesses that are simply tight and extensive, but the following discussion gives designs for harness in which the load of the runner on the running brace tightens the harness. This load-tightening feature may be used with a portion or all of[0083]full harness300. The advantages are (1) that the harness tightens as the load increases, thereby increasing its load capability and (2) the harness loosens when not loaded, thereby improving blood circulation and comfort for the runner.
FIG. 19 is a side schematic view of a generic mechanical design for . mechanical load-[0084]tightener cuff322 used infull harness300 for the running aid. In the bottom section of FIG. 19, load-tighteningcuffs320 overlap and in the top section they do not. Looking at the top section, the two ends of load-tighteningcuffs320, which encircle a portion of the runner's body part, are attached to adjacent cuff buckles328, which, in turn, are attached tomechanical load tightener322 via tighteningcords324. When the brace load pulls up onmechanical load tightener322 as indicated byload arrow330,mechanical load tightener322causes tightening cords324 to pull inward as indicated by tighteningarrows330, thereby tightening load-tighteningcuffs320. Referring to the bottom section of FIG. 19, the same tightening occurs. The difference is thatmechanical load tightener322 must be wide enough to pull together either side of load-tighteningcuffs320 which now overlap by virtue of ending withcuff fingers334. The advantage of this overlapping is that the surface of load-tighteningcuffs320 is smooth in the vicinity ofmechanical load tightener322, thereby providing greater comfort to the runner. In the following examples of load-tightening designs, only one will show this overlapping, but it should be understood that any of them can be adapted for overlapping.
Regarding the use of load-tightening[0085]cuffs320 in general, these may comprise means for lacing or cinching to achieve a snug yet comfortable degree of pre-tightening. Further pre-tightening may be achieved by tightening different levels of the harness, one against the other. For example, waist harness306 may be cinched down againstpelvic harness304 to reduce the compliance between the runner's flesh and the harness. Depending on how much soft tissue there is below the runner's skin, the skin may move a half-inch to an inch or more under shear. Pre-tightening can eliminate most of this compliance.
FIG. 20 shows examples of compressible[0086]woven harness340 for load-tightening sleeves of the harness for the running aid. On the leftside thigh harness302 andtorso harness344 are held at either end byhoops342.Braids346 are interwoven about the shape of a pelvis and thigh. Provided their lower sections are sufficiently anchored, when theupper hoop342 pulls upward, compressiblewoven harness340 must shrink or compress, and this results in gripping of the underlying object, in this case the runner's body pails. In order for this gripping to occur, the individual braid material which composes compressiblewoven harness340 must be inelastic to stretching, but flexible to bending over the shape of the underlying object. This idea is similar to that used for the finger traps known as Chinese hand cuffs, in which a number of bands (tapes, ribbons, strips) are inter-woven into a tube which traps the fingers of unwary children. On the right side of FIG. 20 compressiblewoven harness340 is composed ofbraids346 in such a manner that there is substantial void space between braids346. This has several advantages: ventilation for the runner, a greater compression range, and improved traction of braids on the compressible human flesh underneath. The relative amount of contraction for a given extension betweenhoops342 depends on the number, width, thickness and pitch angle ofbraids346, as well as on their friction coefficient with the underlying surface. If the underlying surface is irregular, it can also be seen that judicious locations ofstays312 andcords314 in FIG. 8 can improve the even distribution of load along the length of a harness.
An important feature of the woven mesh design is that the bottom portion of the sleeve must be sufficiently well anchored as to cause the higher regions to contract and thereby distribute the (upward) load up the entire sleeve length. This may be accomplished for thigh sleeve[0087]20 with straps extending down and around the foot or with straps extending to a stuff around the runner's tibia below the knee. Or, since the runner's thigh has a natural taper, keeping the lower portion of thigh sleeve20 fairly tight may be sufficient in some cases to achieve this anchoring. Once sufficient bottom anchoring is achieved, the load is distributed up the length of compressiblewoven harness340, which is the overall goal.
FIG. 21 is a side view of overlap double-[0088]pulley load tightener318 which is an example of a mechanical load-tightener322 used in the harness for the running aid. Tile discussion here is similar to the discussion of mechanical load-tightener322 for FIG. 9 except thatmechanical load tightener322 is shown in detail rather than schematically. Mechanical load-tightener322 comprises load-tightening cuff320 attached on either end to cuff buckles328 and overlapping each other viacuff fingers334. It further comprisesspreader bar323 which is mounted to load-tightening cuff320 atspreader bar tab325 and which has rotatably mounted on either end tightening pulleys336. When the brace load pulls up onstay cords326 at indicated byload arrows332, staycords326 pass around tighteningpulleys336 to pull tighteningcords324 as indicated by tighteningarrows330, via cuff buckles328, thereby tightening load-tighteningcuffs320.Spreader bar323 is anchored below viaanchor cords327 as indicated byanchor arrows329. At first, it may seem self-defeating to require additional anchor cords forspreader bar323 because the goal is to be able to pull up on load-tighteningcuffs320 with the brace load viastay cords326 and the attachment tospreader bar323 atspreader bar tab325. If load-tighteningcuffs320 are already tight enough,anchor cords327 are not needed, but they provide back-up as the tightening begins. The top section of FIG. 21 shows a blow-up of tighteningpulley336 which optionally may comprise inner tighteningpulley338 and outer tighteningpulley339. In this case, there is a mechanical advantage whereby the travel ofstay cord326 is augmented by a factor equal to the mechanical advantage between these pulleys to create a greater travel of tighteningcord324. This is an important feature because it reduces the slack or compliance needed to tighten mechanical load-tightener322. This means that the running aid can give substantial support to the runner quicker, and this is key to natural running.
FIG. 22 is a side view of bent-[0089]lever load tightener350, jammingload tightener352, and inward-force load tightener375 of the harness for the running aid. These are examples of themechanical load tighteners322 shown in FIG. 9 and FIG. 21, and the first two function in a similar manner. Bent-lever load tightener350 is shown in the bottom left of FIG. 22. Bent levers356 are rotatably attached tospreader bar323 which is attached to load-tightening cuff320 viacuff hoop354.Cuff hoop354 is slidingly attached to load-tightening cuff320 so as to not impede its tightening. Provided load-tightening cuff320 is well pre-tightened or providedspreader bar323 is well anchored below, whenstay cord326 pulls up (see load arrow332) the top arms ofbent levers356, then the bottom arms ofbent levers356 pull the ends of load-tightening cuff320 inward via cuff buckles328 ( see tightening arrows330). A similar function occurs for jammingload tightener352 in the top left of FIG. 22 Here, asspreader bar323 is pulled up, jamminglinks358 tighten load-tightening cuff320. It should be understood thatcuff hoop354 can be used with any of the cuffs discussed herein, and it may be segmented or telescoping to allow cuff20 tighten. Inward-force load tightener375 is shown on the right of FIG. 22, and it functions slightly differently.Frame hoop379 is rigidly attached to harness3 of FIG. 1 and encirclesbody part378, and it is strong enough to be rigid when the jamminglinks358 on either side jam againstpressure pads376 on either side to gripbody part378 as a brace load force pushes up onframe hoop379—to clamp orgrip body part378 as it is supported. It should be understood that there may be a number of these elements distributed about the body harness, and there are a number of mechanisms known to one of ordinary skill in the art for accomplishing this gripping. Again, this last load-tightening mechanism is distinguished from the earlier ones by virtue of the fact that the clamping force is directed inward toward the body part instead of circumferentially around the part body tightening a cuff.
FIG. 23 is a side view of combination mechanical/weave load-[0090]tightener360 of the harness for the running aid. Its purpose is to lift and simultaneously apart spread compressiblewoven harness340.Vertical spreader bar364, attached totop hoop370, pulls upward on compressiblewoven harness340—attached at its top totop hoop370 and its bottom tobottom hoop372. This upward pull is exerted bycables366 which pass firmvertical spreader bar364 around block pulleys362, and then all the way down to pass around spreader pulleys363—attached to the bottom ofvertical spreader bar364—to finally pull down onbottom hoop372, thereby spreading compressiblewoven harness340 and causing it to contract and grip the underlying body part. Block pulleys362 serve to equalize the upward force ontop hoop370 with the downward force onbottom hoop372.Cable arrows374 indicate the pull directions that achieve the spreading apart of compressiblewoven harness340. Tills spreading causes a quicker gripping of the body part, which eventually is lifted when the gripping force becomes sufficiently large.
FIG. 24 is a side view of arm load-[0091]bearing harness380 for the running aid.Runner1 and runner'sarm390 are shown as a dashed line. Tile lower running aid is not shown bit is attached topelvic rim26 as is shown in earlier figures.Arms beam392 is rigidly attached topelvic rim26, andswing links384 are rotatably attached toarm beam392 to supportarm rest388 which supports runner'sarm390 viaarm pad386. Accordingly,runner1 can support a substantial portion of her weight on arm load-bearing harness380 and still swing her arms.
FIG. 25 shows a schematic front view of load-[0092]equalizer stay tree400 which distributes the brace load over various parts of the harness for the running aid. On the left side of the figure stays312support cords314 which attach tocuffs310, which make Up a body harness. In this case, the load will be distributed approximately evenly over eachcord314 andcuff310. If one wishes to vary the load on aparticular cuff310, the elasticity of the attachedcord314 can be varied. In the event that one wishes to ascertain that there is an even load distribution without have to make all thecords314 just the right length, load-equalizer stay tree400 may be used. Here,cords314 are attached at one end to the bottom of load-equalizer stay tree400 and at the other end to thetop cuff310. In between,cord314 passes over stay pulleys alternately attached tocuffs314 and load-equalizer stay tree400. The result is that load-equalizer stay tree400 pulls up evenly oncuffs310 via the attached pulleys. The detailed and workable design is more involved, but this figure demonstrates the principle.
FIG. 26 shows[0093]adjustable harness403 for the running aid.Adjustable bands404 pass around a body part and throughfitting clamps406. Whenadjustable bands404 are pulled to fit tight about the underlying body part, a portion—namelyleftover bands408—of their lengths stick out the other side offitting clamps406. In this way a range of sizes and shapes can be snugly fit withadjustable harness403. The same device can be use to adjustbraids346 which make up compressiblewoven harness340 in FIG. 20. This adjustability is important because a self-tightening harness material should have minimal elasticity.
FIG. 27 shows a side view of a generic brace leg with a[0094]circular brace foot8, demonstrating graphically how well the brace foot prevents vertical travel of the runner's center of mass throughout stance. The figure depicts a stick leg,brace leg9, running from left to right. The stick figure on the left shows heel-strike and on the right shows toe-off. Tile center sequence shows the trajectory of the top ofbrace leg9 throughout stance, at 10 degree intervals of rotation—with alternating positions being either solid or dashed. In the first 10 degrees, the brace top rises 0.5″ (for a 30″ leg); for the next 30 degrees, the brace top stays level because the radius ofbrace foot8 is also 30″, and for the last 10 degrees the brace top falls 0.5″. The curved brace foot can be used with any of the embodiments for the running aid herein, or it can be used in the tenth embodiment with a straight rigid leg as shown in FIG. 27. In this case the “running aid” is actually a walking brace used for support.
FIG. 28 shows hyperlocker[0095]500, a mechanism to guarantee hyper-extension of the self-locking knee mechanism of the fourth embodiment of the invention of FIG. 9.Thigh link4 rotates aboutlip pivot28. Since the direction of running is from right to left on the page, the right side depicts the early stage of swing phase after toe-off The left side depicts the instant just before heel-strike whenknee pivot6 is hyper extended. The purpose ofhyperlocker500 is to force hyper-extension before heel-strike, while still being able to freely foldknee pivot6 at toe-off. This is done by keyinghyperlocker500 to the position ofthigh link4—either swung forward or backward. When thigh link4 swings forward (leftward), slide-pulley cord526 pullsslidable thigh pulley524 up, viatop thigh pulley520 againstrim beam518. Closer cord514 runs from closer-link attachment510 around thigh-link pulley512, up toslidable thigh pulley524, back down to and through beam pulley506 (on the end of upper closer beam502, to end atcord ball522. When thigh link4 is swung back,slidable thigh pulley524 slides downthigh link4, and closer cord514 has enough slack so as to allowcloser links508 to bend andknee pivot6 to fold with no resistance from closer cord514.
However, when thigh link[0096]4 swings forward (leftward, in swing phase), slide-pulley cord526 pullsslidable thigh pulley524 up thereby pulling closer cord514 taut. Now, when tibia link7 starts to move down to prepare for heel-strike, closer-cord catch516 on the end of lowercloser beam504catches cord ball522, causing closer-link attachment510 to be pulled toward thigh-link pulley512, causing the hyper-extension oftibia link7 aboutknee pivot6. By adjusting the various parameters, it is possible to choose the fold angle at which the hyper-extension action begins. Also, a spring can be incorporated in closer cord514.
FIG. 29 shows[0097]slider530 for changing the length of a running aid according to the seventh embodiment of the invention.Slider530 comprisesmiddle guide564 and inner guide566 (which may be telescoping tubes) as well asslider ratchet532. The purpose ofslider530 is to change the length of the running aid even whenknee pivot6 is hyper-extended, to allow uphill running.Slider530 changes length freely during swing phase; at heel-strike, a foot-contact trigger, such as the one shown in FIG. 30, engages slider ratchet532 to lockslider530 throughout stance. When the total brace length can be changed in two ways, with a slider and a knee pivot, it is important to ensure that the hyper-extension of the knee-lock occurs.Hyperlocker500 of FIG. 28 ensures this. Note thatbow guide110, comprisingouter guide562 andmiddle guide564, significantly overlapsslider530—allowing greater length for both elements.
FIG. 30 shows full-stance brace-[0098]foot trigger540 for lockingslider530 throughout stance. An array of ground levers542 are rotatably attached tocurved brace foot8 along its length. The tops of these are fixably interconnected byground trigger cord546, each of which pullsground trigger cord546 aroundground pulley544 and down the length oftibia length7, when thatground lever542 is caused to rotate by contact with runningsurface37. This is true at heel-strike, shown on the right side of the figure, until toe-off, on the left side of the figure. That is, even though each particular ground lever is not always in contact with runningsurface37, there is always at least oneground lever542 in ground contact. Since all ground levers542 are interconnected at their tops, it only takes oneground lever542 to pull onground trigger cord546, ensuring that the force engaging slider ratchet532 of FIG. 29 is exerted throughout stance.
FIG. 31 shows foot-coupling guaranteed[0099]release mechanism548 for release of slider ratchet532 of FIG. 29 at toe-off. This can be used in place of the hyper-extended knee locks of FIGS. 9, 10, and29 to prevent a knee lock or a slider lock from sticking due to premature lifting of his foot by a runner. Foot pivotsquare extension552 extends from the shaft used for pivotable coupling between a runner's foot and bracefoot8. The idea is for foot pivotsquare extension552 to freely move up within down-spring slot549 just at toe-off, thereby reducing any upward force exerted by the runner's foot on the brace foot for an instant, allowing any slider lock to release. During swing phase, foot pivotsquare extension552 must be returned to the bottom of down-spring slot552 to preventbrace foot8 from hanging below the runner's foot and tripping him. This return to the bottom is accomplished with a spring cocked by the force of heel-strike and then released by the upward motion of foot pivotsquare extension548.
In detail, FIG. 31[0100]adepicts the mechanism during stance.Ground lever542 is rotated by ground contact to hold down foot pivotsquare extension552. Downspring554 is cocked and held in place by down-spring pawl556. Downspring554 was cocked by the rotation of groundedlever542 at heel-strike, via the downward pull on cockingcord560 which rums over cockingpulley558 to pull up on downspring554. FIG. 31bdepicts the instant just after toe-off.Ground lever542 is pulled upward by ground-lever return spring550 releasing foot pivotsquare extension552 to be lifted by the runner's foot, (This is when foot pivotsquare extension552 freely moves up within down-spring slot549; this free motion allows slider ratchet532 of FIG. 29 to release.) pushing down-spring pawl556 to the side until it releases downspring544 which pushes foot pivotsquare extension552 back to the bottom of down-spring slot549 (as shown in FIG. 31c) where it stays until heel-strike. FIG. 31dshows the beginning of heel-strike.Ground lever542 is being rotated to pull down cockingcord560 to pull Up and cock downspring554 as it is pulled high enough for spring-loaded down-spring pawl556 to rotate and catch it—at which time FIG. 31aapplies again.
FIG. 32 shows simple-slider running aid[0101]561 according to the eighth embodiment of the invention, wherein a knee pivot is no longer used. The elements ofslider530 and bowguide100 have been explained in the discussion of FIG. 29. Instead of having a knee pivot connect to a tibia link belowbow guide100,inner guide566 extends straight down, all the way to bracefoot8. This embodiment is simple in that it eliminates the knee pivot and all the related mechanisms, but its drawback is that it is not possible to high-kick as high. Full-stance ground trigger540 of FIG. 30 and foot-coupling guaranteedrelease mechanism548 of FIG. 31 can be incorporated in this embodiment. It is possible that the spring which causes slider ratchet to pull away from and disengage frominner guide566 can be strong enough to guarantee slider lock release in which case foot-coupling guaranteedrelease mechanism548 would not be needed. The top ofouter guide562 would be attached tohip pivot28 in a manner similar to that shown in FIG. 6.
On the right side of FIG. 32 there is shown[0102]retractable brace foot545 with lockable hingedextensions547 which can be locked for running or walking on relatively flat or shallow sloping terrain and which can be retracted for running or walking on steps or steep terrain.
FIG. 33 shows a means to combine an active power source with a passive spring according to the ninth embodiment of the invention. In this case actuator[0103]piston44 is propelled downward withinactuator housing43 during the active power stroke. This results in an upward force onactuator housing43 and onbow guide110 which compressesbow spring100. Even if the power stroke is of very short duration, the timing of the expansion of bow spring will be slow enough to appropriately couple with the runner's weight at the top ofbow guide10. In effect, the active component extends the power stroke delivered by the bow spring, and the timing problem is solved by putting the active component in series with the passive component.
FIG. 34[0104]ashows booted lockablehydraulic slider571 and FIG. 34bshows nested lockablehydraulic slider594 both of which can be used for the various lockable sliders. The idea is to utilize the resistance of flow of fluid through a valve to lock, unlock, or control the length change of the two brace length-change means discussed herein: namely,knee pivot6 of FIG. 1 andslider530 of FIG. 32. Referring to FIG. 32a, booted lockablehydraulic slider570 compriseshydraulic piston576 which slides withinhydraulic cylinder575. Fluid flows betweenhydraulic chamber578 andbladder boot581 throughtop orifice579, throughfluid lines586, and through the following valve system.Fluid line586 branches to go through return check valve580 (allowing fluid to return to hydraulic chamber578) on one side and throughexit valve582 and exit check valve (allowing fluid to exit hydraulic chamber578) on the other side.
[0105]Exit valve582 is triggered (by release of toe contact using the full-stance ground trigger540 of FIG. 30) to open at toe-off—thereby allowing fluid572 to move intoreservoir574 ashydraulic piston576 moves tip during the runner's high kick after toe-off. Since there is no resistance to this opening ofexit valve582, even if the runner's foot is prematurely lifting the brace foot, the release of lockablehydraulic slider570 is guaranteed.
In swing phase,[0106]hydraulic piston576 is now free to move both up and down as one check valve allows fluid to flow in and the other allows fluid to flow out. Just before heel-strike,exit valve582 is triggered ( by pre-strike heel contact) to close. At heel-strike,hydraulic piston576 cannot move up becauseexit valve582 is closed. Thus, lockablehydraulic slider570 is locked. In view of the fact that some running brace designs require hydraulic sliders to resist considerable non-axial loads, piston sliding friction is reduced by not using o-rings. This is possible sincebladder boot581 receives any fluid that leaks through the small area betweenhydraulic piston576 andhydraulic cylinder575;bladder boot581 is sealed by ring seals583.
[0107]Cylinder rollers585 resist any non-axial load in any design application wherehydraulic piston576 slides under load. For example, in order to walk down steps or to run downhill,exit valve582 can be controlled to be partially open, allowing576 hydraulic piston to move slowly upward and lockablehydraulic slider570 to slowly compress. The size of the opening ofexit valve582 determines how fast the runner or walker can walk down steps, and the valve can be controlled manually by the runner.
FIG. 34[0108]bshows that one telescoping element can be nested within another to achieve a higher “high-kick” by the runner just after toe-off. Also, conventional0-rings are used to prevent fluid leakage for this case where the bladder reservoir is not booted. Nested lockablehydraulic slider594 further comprisesinner piston588 which telescopes withinhydraulic piston576, which now has a hole,fluid opening590, to allow fluid to flow from innerhydraulic chamber592 throughhydraulic chamber578 toreservoir574. The timing of the triggering is the same as that just discussed.
Again, nested lockable[0109]hydraulic slider594 and booted lockablehydraulic slider571 can be simply substituted for the sliders discussed elsewhere herein, or it can be used to lock a knee pivot. FIG. 35 showsknee pivot6 locked by lockablehydraulic slider570 according to the eleventh embodiment of the invention. The triggering is the same as that just discussed. When booted lockablehydraulic slider571 locks,knee pivot6 also locks.
FIG. 36 shows self-hyper-[0110]locker36 for guaranteeing hyper-extension at foot strike. The idea is to routecloser cord B624 around a path which passes both on the front side and back side of foldingknee pivot6 in such a manner that the back part of the path (between topinside post604 and inside pulley628) increases faster than the front part of the path (between topoutside post602 and outside pulley626) astibia link7 andthigh link4 unfold aboutknee pivot6. By choosing a certain length ofcloser cord B624,closer cord B624 becomes taut at a particular flexion angle as the unfolding occurs, causingcloser cord B624 to begin to pull on closingspring610 which acts to accelerate the unfolding, especially if closingspring610 is pre-loaded (which is easily accomplished with a plug (not shown) oncloser cord B624 just below the bottom of notched tube608). Topoutside post602 and topinside post604 are fixably attached tothigh link4. Bottomoutside post630 and bottom insidepost632 are fixably attached totibia link7—providing support foroutside pulley626 and insidepulley628. Notchedtube608 is attached to topoutside post602 byreset spring620.Closer cord B624 is attached to notchedtube608 via closingspring610 which is stronger thanreset spring620. Notchedtube608 is slidably connected tothigh link4 via notched-tube guide606.Pawl612 is pivotly connected tothigh link4 atpawl pivot616 via pawl tab614 (fixably attached to thigh link4).Pawl spring618bias pawl612 to engage the notch in notchedtube608 when it is pulled upward in swing phase byreset spring620.
Accordingly, FIG. 36[0111]ashows self-hyperlocker600 in swing phase whencloser cord B624 is slack and there is no unfolding force—allowing thetibia link7 to swing freely.Reset spring620 has pulled notchedtube608 up so thatpawl612 can engage its notch. Again, at a particular flexionangle closing spring610 slams tibia link7 closed as seen in FIG. 36b. Just after the joint becomes hyper-extended,pawl bumper622 impinges the bottom ofpawl612 causing it to disengage from the notch of notchedtube608, thereby releasingclosing spring610 from its folding force because notchedtube608 moves down notched-tube guide606—shortening the patch of closer cord B624 (shown in FIG. 36c) and causing it to become slack. Thus, there is no closing force later, at toe-off, to resist folding and high kick. Self-hyperlocker600 is called “self” because it does not require any trigger from the foot or the hip to work. The release of closing force is keyed to hyper-extension at the knee pivot. Self-hyperlocker600 can be used with simple-hinge knee pivots or with four-bar knee pivots (in which case it only needs to be located at one of the two knee pivots).
FIG. 37 shows a “hyper-extension bounce back” prevention means for prevention of folding of a hyper-extending knee lock at heel strike.[0112]Pinched bladder640 is glued tobladder step646 intibia link7.Pinch band624 forms a portion ofpinched bladder640 exterior tobladder step646. And it allows only a small orifice connecting the main body ofpinched bladder640 withelastomer nipple644. When tibia link7 closes to the point where hyper-extension of the joint begins, the bottom ofthigh link4 squeezes bladder fluid through the orifice made bypinch band642 intoelastomer nipple646, causing it to expand. The resistance to fluid flow through a small orifice absorbs the impact energy of the closing of the joint so it does not bounce back open. The force exerted by the expansion ofelastomer644 is too small to re-open the joint when it is loaded by a runner's weight, but this force is large enough to force the fluid back through the orifice during swing phase whenpinched bladder640 is no longer squeezed. This is a very cheap and simple way to eliminate bounce-back opening of the knee joint as compared with elaborate, expensive hydraulic devices used in conventional above-knee prostheses.
FIG. 38[0113]ashows a rear view and FIG. 38ba side view of front/back brace leg650 in which the pelvic coupling is made directly behind and in front of the runner's ischial tuberosity (buttock) rather on the side of the hip.Front hip pivot678 is pivotly attached to harness3 directly above runner'sleg676 in front, and backhip pivot680 is pivotly attached to harness3 directly above runner'sleg676 in back. Front and back—hip pivots678 and680, knee pivots660 and662, andthigh links652 and654—andknee cross link674 form a four-bar system. Front and back—ankle pivots670 and672, knee pivots660 and662, andankle links670 and672—andknee cross link674 form another four-bar system—with knee pivots660 and662 andknee cross link674 being shared between these two four-bar systems. The runner's pelvis and/orharness3 act as the cross link at the hip level for the upper four-bar system, and bracefoot8 acts as the cross link at the foot level for the lower four-bar system. These two four-bar systems are sufficiently distant from runnier'sleg676 throughout a stride as to not interfere with the same. Backhydraulic knee lock664 is rotatably connected to aback thigh link654 and backtibia link668 so that when a foot trigger (not shown, but straightforward to implement for one of ordinary skill in the art) locks backhydraulic knee lock664 as foot strike, flexion aboutback knee pivot662 is locked. Another knee lock could be used forfront knee pivot660, but this is not necessary because backknee pivot662 is shared by both four-bar systems. That is, when backknee pivot662 is locked, both the above-mentioned top and bottom four-bar systems are converted to three-bar systems, and both structures are locked. Folding of the upper and lower four-bar systems with respect to each other is realized as the runner's weight leans forward. This folding can be enhanced by tethering front and back knee pivots660 and662 to the runner's knee. The runner's foot can now be coupled to bracefoot8 anywhere along the length of the runner's foot. Front and back bows656 and658 store and return impact energy, and only one of these need be used. Finally, if the one or both knee pivots in FIG. 38 are constrained from hyper-extending (see e.g. FIGS. 16 and 36), a separate knee lock, such as backhydraulic knee lock664, can be eliminated since the “constrained hyper-extension knee lock” naturally locks at heel-strike and naturally starts folding just before toe-off. Having a separate knee lock allows the runner to run uphill or to land with a more substantially pre-bent leg, but this capability is not needed in many applications. This is even more true for a running brace than for above-knee prostheses, since the runner's leg is there to prevent a fall.
FIG. 39 shows front/[0114]back pack extension690 for comfortable and optimal pack load support. The running/walking brace shown is front/back brace leg650 of FIG. 38.Front pack frame692 is pivotly attached to the top front of front/back brace leg650 by pack-frame pivot698, and backpack frame694 is pivotly attached to the top back of front/back brace leg650 by pack-frame pivot698. Pack straps696 attachfront pack700 tofront pack frame692, and backpack702 to backpack frame694. If the brace legs were not supporting the pack weight, there would be an uncomfortably high load on the runner's shoulders. Also, the front parts of front/back pack extension690 can be eliminated, in whichcase runner1 must lean forward at the waist to balance the pack.
FIG. 40 shows four-bar knee joint[0115]704 with hyper-extension stop708 which prevents hyperextension of the joint. Optional four-barhydraulic lock706 can be used to lock four-bar knee joint704 and which can be triggered to lock a foot-contact in a manner similar to that of booted lockablehydraulic slider571 of FIG. 34.
FIG. 41 is a schematic side view of a low-eccentricity knee[0116]joint straightener720. It resists folding aboutside knee pivot6 with only a very small force (of circle spring728) beyond a chosen flexion angle so that the wearer is free to high kick. Astibia link7 descends beyond this chosen flexion angle, low-eccentricity knee-joint straightener720 acts to accelerate this straightening viaclose spring724 with a force that increases proportional toeccentricity712 of the spring force aboutknee pivot6. Thus, the greatest straightening force acts when full straightening occurs. The components are assembled as follows.Circle tube730 is rigidly attached tothigh link4 andcircle brace732 which extends rigidly fromthigh link4.Slide ring726 slides alongcircle tube730 and it is connected both to closespring724 which extends down to connect totibia link7 and tocircle spring728 which extends through circle rube to connect to its upper end.Slide ring726 is constrained from sliding tip and to the right at a chosen location. Pivot stops86 prevent hyper-extension aboutside knee pivot68. In FIG. 41a, the configuration is straight,eccentricity202 is at a maximum value, and the straightening force is at a maximum value. In FIG. 41b, shin tube has folded to the point where shin-tube extension722 impingesslide ring726,eccentricity702 is very small, and the straightening force due toclose spring724 is very small. In FIG. 41c,shin tube64 has folded considerably. However, the straightening force due toclose spring724 is still very small becauseslide ring726 is forced to slide aroundcircle tube730 by shin-tube extension722 andeccentricity702 remains very small. There is still a very small resistance to folding due tocircle spring730 which is much weaker thanclose spring724. Again, as straightening progresses beyond the configuration of FIG. 41b, the straightening force increases rapidly.
This completes the discussion of the figures. Now a few general issues will be discussed. One of the key problems discussed in various parts of this patent is to guarantee the release of the lock of the swing-phase length change means, which can be the self-locking knee mechanism FIG. 9, the variable-angle knee lock of FIG. 11, the slider of FIG. 29, or the simple slider of FIG. 32. This lock release is necessary but not sufficient for guaranteed folding (about the knee pivot for the hyper-extended knee locks) which will be discussed afterward. Guaranteed lock release is necessary because a runner can lift the brace foot prematurely, thereby preventing a break in the loading of the lock, therefore preventing lock release; then the runner could fall flat on her face. For the hyper-extending design of FIG. 9, a simple spring between thigh-[0117]link constraint120 and tibia-link constraint122 might suffice. If more guarantee is needed the hyperlocker mechanisms of FIG. 28 and36 can be utilized. Also, a four-bar system such as that shown in FIG. 38 will naturally fold as the runner's weight leans forward near the end of stance. For the variable-angle knee-lock, tibia lock-release93 of FIG. 16 can be used if a simple spring—to push downsplit collar69 with respect tohollow shaft62, thereby disengagingcircumferential strips78—does not suffice to release the lock at toe-off. For the slider of FIG. 29 or the simple slider of FIG. 32, a spring to disengage slider ratchet532 may be sufficient to release the lock at toe-off. If not, foot-coupling guaranteed release mechanism of FIG. 31 can be used.
Guaranteed folding (about the knee pivot for the hyper-extended knee locks) is achieved with a heel coupling in FIG. 9, a knee tether (mentioned in the discussion of FIG. 38 although it could be used in any of the hyper-extended knee locks), and as a natural consequence of a forward lean in the discussion of FIG. 38 of a four-bar knee pivot. It simply means that the force exerted by the runner on the brace leg must fold the knee pivot rather than hyper-extend it.[0118]
In conclusion, the invention herein described comprises a variety of passive or spring running aids—most notably an energy efficient running aid or brace which provides optimally fast support of a runner's impact load by virtue of the buckling load force curve of the bucky-bow spring and by virtue of the load-tightening body harness with minimal compliance. In addition, the designs can also be used for walking or in conjunction with an active power source. The spring is lightweight and features an optimally long travel, along with an optimal constant force curve. In the second embodiment of FIGS. 6 and 7, since a cable system with pulleys is used, there is a “gear changing” feature, and a single bow spring can be used for either leg. The harness achieves a unique capability in that it provides for a uniform distribution of impact load over a substantial portion of the runner's body, even though the runner's body is vertical. Comfort is enhanced with a load-tightening feature of the harness. The daunting knee-lock problem is circumvented with a knee self-locking device of FIG. 9 which solves the other difficult problem of guaranteed knee-lock release, and it is solved with the variable-angle knee locking device of FIGS.[0119]11-14 and the lock-release devices of FIGS. 16, 31,34 and36. This variable-angle device allows uphill running, and it results in an effective gear changing because the spring action is not as aligned with the thrust action when the knee pivot locks at a more bent position. Finally, a shaped brace foot solves the problem of leg-length asymmetry. The overall design is lightweight, and this aspect is improved by minimizing the distill weight of the running aid.
It should be understood that the running aid described herein has many features which apply to robotic running as well as to a running brace. These include the spring mechanisms for energy return, the brace foot, and the self-locking pivot. The running aid invention uses either the pulley-bow or the series bucky bow, as well as the single pulley bow in the back, all can be easily adapted to robotic running. The brace foot should be used as well in robotic running to optimize the angles of leg/foot support while landing and taking off for greater performance and fuel economy. A slight adaptation would be needed to use the self-locking knee pivot because there is no runner's foot to lift Up the heel pivot to fold the knee pivot. Instead, a cable could be spring-loaded and triggered by toe-off to pull on the heel pivot to unlock the knee pivot for swing phase. And, the uphill running feature to allow the bow to engage and the knee pivot to lock when the runner's leg lands partially bent can also be use in robotic running. Also, the front/back brace leg of FIG. 38 can be used for exo-skeleton applications which are active as well as passive. And, it can be used for above-knee prostheses and robots. Furthermore, separate four-bar systems can be used to allow articulation in the roll plane as well as the pitch plane.[0120]
The running aid designs herein also can be used for both walking even though the main thrust in the development of these designs has been for running. These running aid designs can also be used for carrying a backpack. The backpack can simply be attached to the pelvic rim of the harness in which case the running aid substantially supports the load of the backpack, and the harness is not needed—at least for support of the pack by the running brace. Or, as just described for FIG. 39, tile front/back brace leg of FIG. 38 can be used to support pack weight both in front of and behind the runner via a front/back pack extension. This design provides for improved equilibrium of the runner/pack system, and it eliminates the uncomfortable backward force on the runner's Shoulders resulting from pack which is only in the back.[0121]
Since the preferred spring systems described herein provide an approximately constant force curve, they also provide for the maximum amount of absorption and return of impact energy—given a threshold level of force that the human body can safely tolerate. This means that these preferred spring systems, herein called bucky-bow springs or “series” bow springs, can be used for extreme landing protection such as with parachute landing or jumping from heights, and the full-body harness described herein can also be used for these applications. It is hoped that this invention will provide enjoyment and injury-free exercise for people who love to run.[0122]
The above description shall not be construed as limiting the ways in which this invention may be practiced but shall in inclusive of many other variations that do not depart from the broad interest and intent of the invention.[0123]