Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


US10647573B2 - Reformer device comprising a CO2 membrane - Google Patents

Reformer device comprising a CO2 membrane
Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US10647573B2
US10647573B2US15/564,521US201615564521AUS10647573B2US 10647573 B2US10647573 B2US 10647573B2US 201615564521 AUS201615564521 AUS 201615564521AUS 10647573 B2US10647573 B2US 10647573B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
reaction
reformer
membrane
reaction chamber
reformer device
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active, expires
Application number
US15/564,521
Other versions
US20180079643A1 (en
Inventor
Peter Mølgaard MORTENSEN
Martin Østberg
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Topsoe AS
Original Assignee
Haldor Topsoe AS
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Haldor Topsoe ASfiledCriticalHaldor Topsoe AS
Assigned to HALDOR TOPSØE A/SreassignmentHALDOR TOPSØE A/SASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS).Assignors: ØSTBERG, Martin, MORTENSEN, PETER MØLGAARD
Assigned to HALDOR TOPSØE A/SreassignmentHALDOR TOPSØE A/SCHANGE OF ADDRESS OF ASSIGNEEAssignors: HALDOR TOPSØE A/S
Publication of US20180079643A1publicationCriticalpatent/US20180079643A1/en
Application grantedgrantedCritical
Publication of US10647573B2publicationCriticalpatent/US10647573B2/en
Assigned to TOPSOE A/SreassignmentTOPSOE A/SCHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS).Assignors: HALDOR TOPSØE A/S
Activelegal-statusCriticalCurrent
Adjusted expirationlegal-statusCritical

Links

Images

Classifications

Definitions

Landscapes

Abstract

A reformer device including a reaction chamber for carrying out a reaction having a hydrocarbon stream as a reactant gas and with hydrogen rich synthesis gas as a reaction product. The membrane is provided within the reaction chamber. The reformer device further includes a heating reactor for heating the reaction chamber, where the membrane is a semi-permeable membrane arranged to allow CO2 pass through it; the reaction chamber includes a catalyst material arranged to catalyze a steam methane reforming reaction and to catalyze a water gas shift reaction; and the reformer device is arranged to carry out the steam methane reforming reaction at a pressure between about 15 and about 50 barg within the reaction chamber. A method for carrying out a reaction having a hydrocarbon stream as a reactant gas and with hydrogen rich synthesis gas as reaction product, in a reformer device.

Description

The invention relates to a reformer device comprising a reaction chamber for carrying out a reaction having a hydrocarbon stream as a reactant gas and with hydrogen rich synthesis gas as a reaction product, wherein a membrane is provided within the reaction chamber, said reformer device further comprising a heating reactor for heating the reaction chamber. The invention moreover relates to a method for carrying out a reaction having a hydrocarbon stream as a reactant gas and with hydrogen rich synthesis gas as reaction product, in a reformer device, where the reformer device comprises a reaction chamber, said reaction chamber comprising a semi-permeable membrane, and a heating reactor.
Current global demand for hydrogen is increasing, particularly in refineries where hydrogen is utilized in order to reduce sulfur content and in upgrading the bottom of the barrel. Within a given refinery, the hydrogen plant will feature as one of the largest fired furnaces with respect to energy input. Therefore, it is important to maximize the efficiency of hydrogen production in order to reduce the energy consumption and CO2footprint of the hydrogen plant.
Within a reformer device comprising a reaction chamber for carrying out reactions having a hydrocarbon stream as a reactant gas and having hydrogen rich synthesis gas as a reaction product, typical reactions comprise:
CH4+H2O=CO+3H2  (1)
CO+H2O=CO2+H2  (2)
CnHm+nH2O=nCO+(n+½m)H2  (3)
The reaction (3) only takes place in the case where the feed gas comprises higher hydrocarbons.
The combination of the reforming reaction (1) and the water gas shift reaction (2) is:
CH4+2H2O=CO2+4H2  (4)
WO2007/142518 relates to a reactor device and a method for carrying out a reaction with hydrogen as reaction product. The reactor device comprises a reaction chamber for carrying out a reaction with hydrogen (H2) as reaction product. The reactor device comprises a combustion chamber and a hydrogen-permeable membrane, which is provided between the reaction chamber and the combustion chamber. A supply channel is provided in the combustion chamber, for supplying a fluid containing oxygen (O2), such as air, to the combustion chamber.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,163,065 relates to a carbon dioxide permeable membrane. The membrane includes a body having a first side and an opposite second side, and the body is configured to allow carbon dioxide to pass from the first side to the second side. U.S. Pat. No. 8,163,065 describes,column 10, lines 43-51, that the carbon dioxide membrane could be used for steam methane reforming. However, in this application, the system can be limited to low-pressure operation, and that gasification of a more carbon rich fuel, such as biomass, oil, coal or charcoal, with oxygen or steam can contain a larger concentration of carbon dioxide product gas that would favor the use of a high temperature and pressure membrane.
An object of the invention is to provide a reformer device and a method for increasing the yield of hydrogen from a hydrocarbon reactant gas. Another object of the invention is to reduce the operating costs of a reformer device and a method for producing hydrogen. Another object of the invention is to reduce the capital expenditures for a hydrogen producing plant.
One aspect of the invention relates to a reformer device comprising a reaction chamber for carrying out a reaction having a hydrocarbon stream as a reactant gas and with hydrogen rich synthesis gas as a reaction product. A membrane is provided within the reaction chamber, and the reformer device further comprises a heating reactor for heating the reaction chamber. The membrane is a semi-permeable membrane arranged to allow CO2pass through it. The reaction chamber comprises a catalyst material arranged to catalyze a steam methane reforming reaction and to catalyze a water gas shift reaction. The reformer device is arranged to carry out the steam methane reforming reaction at a pressure between about 15 and about 50 barg within the reaction chamber. The semi-permeable membrane is arranged to allow carbon dioxide to pass through it and to hinder the other components of the reactions, viz. hydrogen, CO, from permeating through it.
The skilled person would know how to choose an appropriate catalyst material arranged to catalyze a steam methane reforming reaction and to catalyze a water gas shift reaction. As examples only, such a catalyst material could be a nickel based steam reforming catalyst with a ceramic carrier made of oxides, such as for example aluminum oxide, magnesium oxide or calcium oxide. The catalyst may also include ruthenium and/or rhenium as active phase.
The membrane material may be any appropriate membrane material, advantageously a dual-phase ceramic carbonate membrane. Examples could be ceramic phases as SDC (Ce0.8Sm0.2O1.9), LSCF (La0.6Sr0.4Co0.8Fe0.2O3-δ), or LCGFA (La0.85Ce0.1Ga0.3Fe0.6Al0.05O3-δ) or a carbonate phase of a mixture of Li/Na/K carbonate. The dual-phase ceramic-carbonate membrane is a non-porous type membrane where CO2is transported through the membrane. CO2reacts with oxygen ions in the membrane and can then diffuse in the carbonate phase to the CO2-deficient side. Oxygen ions are then transported back to the CO2-rich side in the ceramic oxide. These membranes have absolute selectivity for CO2if they can be ensured leak tight and can additionally be used at high temperature operation (up to 1000° C.).
Typical reformers are operated at a medium pressure, such as at between 15 and 50 barg, in order to avoid reformers from being inadvertently big. When the resultant hydrogen rich gas is output at medium pressure, the use of a separate compressor for pressurizing the hydrogen rich synthesis gas is superfluous. However, this pressure within the reformer is disadvantageous from a reaction point of view. It is well known to use a hydrogen permeable membrane in a reformer. However, in this case the CO2rich gas is typically delivered at the medium pressure, e.g. 30 barg, whilst the hydrogen H2will be at low pressure, e.g. 1 bar.
When using a semi-permeable membrane within the reaction chamber, the membrane being arranged to allow CO2to pass, according to the invention, the hydrogen rich synthesis gas may be output at a medium pressure, corresponding to the pressure within the reaction chamber, whilst the CO2is provided at about 1 bar. Thus the hydrogen rich synthesis gas may be output at a medium pressure without the use of a compressor.
When the catalyst material is arranged to both catalyze a steam methane reforming reaction and a water gas shift reaction, both steam methane reforming and water gas shift can take place within the reaction chamber. The combination of the steam methane reforming reaction and the water gas shift reaction is: (4) CH4+2 H2O=CO2+4 H2. When carbon monoxide (CO) and carbon dioxide (CO2) is removed already in the reformer device and when the catalyst material is arranged to both catalyze a steam methane reforming reaction and a water gas shift reaction, a separate water gas shift unit and/or pressure swing adsorption unit may be spared or at least reduced in size. Moreover, a product with high purity hydrogen is obtained with little or no content of carbon monoxide and/or carbon dioxide.
When CO2passes through the CO2membrane and is outlet from the reformer device, the reaction (4) is shifted towards the product (right side of reaction) and therefore, the temperature within the reformer device may be lowered compared to a situation where the CO2stays within the reaction chamber while maintaining a similar yield of hydrogen. All CO may also be removed and CH4slip may be minimized due to the shifting of the reaction (4) towards the product. In addition to being able to reduce the reaction temperature, it is another advantage that a separate unit for water gas shift in a plant for producing hydrogen may be reduced considerably in size or even spared.
In total, the hydrogen yield per consumed hydrocarbon reactant gas is also increased in a reaction device with a CO2membrane in the reaction chamber compared to a reaction device operated at the same conditions but without the membrane. Moreover, CO2is delivered as or can relatively easy be converted into a relative pure, possibly valuable, product. Methane reforming is a strongly endothermic reaction requiring high energy input and typically it results a high CO2footprint. The CO2footprint is in particular large in hydrogen plants where the C-atoms in the hydrocarbon feed stream is neither collected in a CO2product (which is traditionally done in NH3plants) nor a part of a downstream C-containing product, but is vented in a stack. Removing CO2with a membrane in the reformer device will facilitate a major reduction in required heat input due to lower required reforming temperature and an inherent reduction in CO2emission. Additionally, collecting the C-atoms in the hydrocarbon feed streams in a CO2footprint rich product leads to substantial additional reduction in CO2footprint from hydrogen plants.
It is clear, that the invention is not limited to a reformer device with only one reaction chamber; instead, any appropriate number of reaction chambers may be present within the reformer device.
In an embodiment, the membrane defines an inner diffusion chamber, the inner diffusion chamber having an inlet to admit a sweep gas arranged to sweep CO2diffused into the diffusion chamber out through an outlet from the diffusion chamber. As an example only, the sweep gas may be N2or H2O. As an example only, the membrane may be placed internally as an inner tube within the reaction chamber so that during operation of the reformer device of the invention, CO2will diffuse from outside the inner tube into the inner tube.
In another embodiment, the membrane defines an inner reaction chamber and an outer diffusion chamber, the outer diffusion chamber having an inlet to admit a sweep gas arranged to sweep CO2diffused into the outer diffusion chamber through the diffusion chamber and out through an outlet from the outer diffusion chamber. The membrane may be placed internally as an inner tube, which then hosts the catalyst material, and the outer diffusion chamber is defined by the space between the inner tube formed by the membrane and the reaction chamber. The diameter of the inner tube formed by the membrane has influence on the production of hydrogen rich synthesis gas. Increasing the membrane diameter or the inner tube diameter will cause an increase in the production of hydrogen rich synthesis gas.
In an embodiment, the reformer device is arranged to allow the sweep gas and the reactant gas to flow in countercurrent. Calculations have shown that when the sweep gas flows in countercurrent to the reactant gas flow, the production in hydrogen rich synthesis gas is increased (seeFIG. 5) compared to the case where the sweep gas flows concurrently with the reactant gas flow. This is due to the saturation of the sweep gas with CO2when the sweep gas flows concurrently with the reactant gas flow. Such a saturation is avoided in countercurrent flow.
In an embodiment, the permeance of the CO2membrane is above about 1 kmol/m2/h/atm, preferably above about 3 kmol/m2/h/atm, more preferably above about 8 kmol/m2/h/atm. The permeance of the CO2membrane has a significant effect on the production of hydrogen rich synthesis gas, at least up to about 2 kmol/m2/h/atm.
In an embodiment, the membrane is only provided in the most downstream part of the reaction chamber, such as the most downstream half of the reaction chamber, the most downstream third or most downstream fourth of the reaction chamber. Simulations have revealed that intensive removal of CO2from the upstream part of the reaction chamber leads to decreasing production of hydrogen rich synthesis gas, especially in the case of a sweep gas in co-current with the reactant gas. This is because CO2removal in this part shifts the water gas swift reaction toward the “CO2+H2” side (see reaction (4)), resulting in removal of water and therefore a decreasing potential for methane conversion in the steam reforming reaction (see reaction (1)). It has turned out to be advantageous to make a design where a CO2membrane is only provided in the most downstream half, such as the most downstream one third or most downstream one fourth of the reaction chamber. Calculations show that such a design has the same efficiency as a similar reaction chamber with a membrane throughout the whole length of the reaction chamber for high permeance values.
In an embodiment, the temperature within the reformer device during steam reforming is below about 800° C., preferably at about 700° C. When the operating temperature of the reformer device during steam reforming is decreased from e.g. 950° C. to below about 800° C., e.g. at about 700° C., several benefits are achievable:
In an embodiment, the reformer device is a fired reformer, a radiant wall reformer, a convective reformer, e.g. a heat exchange reformer or a tubular bayonet reformer, or an autothermal reformer. In case of an autothermal reformer, the heating reactor and the reaction chamber are integrated into one chamber.
Another aspect of the invention relates to a method for carrying out a reaction having a hydrocarbon stream as a reactant gas and with hydrogen rich synthesis gas as reaction product, in a reformer device, where the reformer device comprises a reaction chamber, said reaction chamber comprising a semi-permeable membrane, and a heating reactor for heating the reaction chamber. The hydrocarbon stream is admitted into the reformer device and brought into contact with a catalyst material arranged to catalyze a steam methane reforming reaction and arranged to catalyze a water gas shift reaction within the reaction chamber. During the reaction, CO2passes through the semi-permeable membrane. The pressure within the reaction chamber is between about 15 and about 50 barg. As an example only, the pressure within the reaction chamber is 35 barg.
In an embodiment, CO2is removed from the reaction chamber continuously. In an embodiment, the catalyst material also catalyzes a water gas shift reaction within the reaction chamber.
In an embodiment, the membrane defines an inner diffusion chamber, and wherein a sweep gas is admitted into the inner diffusion chamber through an inlet, where the sweep gas sweeps CO2diffused into the diffusion chamber out through an outlet from the diffusion chamber. As an example only, the membrane may be placed internally as an inner tube within the reaction chamber so that during operation of the reformer device of the invention, CO2will diffuse from outside the inner tube into the inner tube.
In an embodiment, the sweep gas and the reactant gas to flow in countercurrent. Calculations have shown that when the sweep gas flows in countercurrent to the reactant gas flow, the production in hydrogen rich synthesis gas is increased (seeFIG. 5) compared to the case where the sweep gas flows concurrently with the reactant gas flow. This is due to the saturation of the sweep gas with CO2when the sweep gas flows concurrently with the reactant gas flow. Such a saturation is avoided in countercurrent flow.
In an embodiment, the temperature within the reformer device during steam reforming is below about 800° C., preferably at about 700° C. When the operating temperature of the reformer device during steam reforming is decreased from e.g. 950° C. to below about 800° C., e.g. at about 700° C., several benefits are achievable:
The term “medium pressure” is meant to denote a pressure between the normal meaning of the terms “low pressure” and “high pressure”, where the term “low pressure” typically means a pressure of 0-5 barg and the term “high pressure” typically means a pressure of about 100 barg or above. Thus, “medium pressure” will be between 5 barg and 100 barg.
The term “barg” denotes a pressure gauge zero-referenced to atmospheric pressure and thus denotes a pressure above atmospheric pressure.
SHORT DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a schematic drawing of an example of a hydrogen plant,
FIG. 2 is a schematic drawing of an example of areformer device20,
FIGS. 3a-3dare schematic drawings of exemplary reaction chambers of a reformer device according to the invention,
FIG. 4 is a graph depicting the reactor temperature within an embodiment of a reaction chamber of the invention as a function of the efficiency of a membrane in a reaction chamber of the invention, and
FIG. 5 is a graph depicting an increase in H2production as a function of the CO2permeance of the membrane in an embodiment of a reaction chamber of the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
The figures show exemplary embodiments of the invention only and are not to be seen as limiting the invention. Throughout the figures, like reference numbers are meant to indicate like features. Moreover, it should be noted that the orientation of the reformer device of the invention is not limited to the orientation shown in theFIGS. 2 and 3a-3d. Thus, instead of a vertical orientation of the reformer device, it could be horizontal. Moreover, the feedstock steam could be input into the reformer device at the lower side thereof instead of at the upper side thereof, if appropriate.
FIG. 1 is a schematic drawing of ahydrogen plant50, comprising afeed purification unit10, areformer20, a watergas shift unit30 and a pressureswing adsorption unit40.
Feedstock stream1 is input to thefeed purification unit10. Thefeed purification unit10 is arranged to remove sulfur and/or chlorine compounds and/or to saturate olefins, including di-olefins in hydrocarbon feedstock streams. The feedstock stream is a hydrocarbon stream, such as for example natural gas/methane CH4. Thereaction product2 is hydrogen (H2).
A prereforming unit may be present (not shown inFIG. 1) for steam reforming of all higher hydrocarbons in the feedstock in order to provide more stable and mild operating conditions for the reformer device in carrying out the steam methane reforming. With a prereformer, the risk of carbon formation from higher hydrocarbons in the reaction chamber of the reformer device is reduced and the operating parameters, such as maximum average flux and temperature, can be optimized. Moreover, heat integration and heat recovery can be improved as the prereformed hydrocarbon/steam mixture can be preheated to a high temperature (typically 625-650° C.) without the risk of coking in the preheat coil.
Steam reforming takes place in thereformer20. During operation, the reactant stream or supply stream is fed to the reaction chamber of the steam reformer.
Thereformer20 is a reformer device having one or more reaction chambers, e.g. reformer tubes, for carrying out a steam methane reforming reaction. Since the steam methane reforming reaction is endothermic, heat needs to be supplied, and therefore the one or more reaction chambers are placed within a heating reactor for heating the one or more reaction chambers. In order to provide the heat,fuel4 is input into the heating reactor. An oxidant stream, such as oxygen or atmospheric air, may be input into the heating reactor together with thefuel4 or via a separate input into the heating reactor.
The reformer may e.g. be a fired reformer, such as a top fired reformer or a bottom fired reformer, a radiant wall reformer, a convective reformer, a heat exchange reformer or a bayonet reformer.
An off-gas stream3 from thePSA40 may also be input to thereformer20. The off-gas stream3 typically comprises CO2, H2and CH4, and is recycled to the heating reactor of thereformer20 in order to use its fuel value. InFIG. 1, thestreams3 and4 are mixed into onestream5. However, it is also conceivable that thestreams3 and4 were input into separate inputs to the heating reactor.
The catalyst material within the reformer device is arranged to carry out water gas shift in addition to steam methane reforming. A separate water gas shift unit may be done without or at least reduced in size, if the water gas shift reaction carried out by the catalyst material within the reformer device is sufficient. However, alternatively, a separate watergas shift unit30 may be present within theplant50. The watergas shift unit30 may be smaller than conventional water gas shift units if the catalyst within thereformer20 is arranged to carry out water gas shift as well.
In the case where thefeedstock stream1 is methane CH4, and where only a partial water gas shift reaction takes place within thereformer20, the stream from thereformer20 comprises CO, CO2and H2. In case of a full water gas shift reaction, that is a conversion of most of the CO in the gas within the reaction chamber, the stream output from the reformer mainly comprises carbon dioxide CO2and hydrogen H2
The stream from the water gas shift unit30 (or the stream from the combined reformer and watergas shift unit20, in case of ahydrogen plant50 without a separate water gas shift unit) mainly comprises carbon dioxide CO2and hydrogen H2.
The stream from the water gas shift unit30 (or the stream from the combined reformer and watergas shift unit20, in case of ahydrogen plant50 without a separate water gas shift unit) is input into a pressure swing adsorption (PSA)unit40 arranged to separate carbon dioxide fromhydrogen2. The carbon dioxide is removed from thePSA unit40, and some of it is recycled asstream3 to the heating reactor of thereformer2 for temperature control.
Even thoughFIG. 1 shows a hydrogen plant, it is stressed that the invention is not limited to hydrogen plants. For example, the invention is also advantageous in ammonia plants, since ammonia plants typically comprise expensive CO2removal units, which can be done without or at least reduced considerably in size in a plant with a reformer device of the invention.
FIG. 2 is a schematic drawing of an example of areformer device20. Thereformer device20 is a steam methane reformer and comprises areaction chamber22 and a surroundingheating reactor24. Thereaction chamber22 comprisescatalyst material26. Thereaction chamber22 is shown as a single unit inFIG. 2; however, thereaction chamber22 could be a plurality of reaction tubes instead of a single unit. Ahydrocarbon stream1 as a reactant gas is input into thereaction chamber22, and a hydrogen rich synthesis gas is output as areaction product7. The hydrogenrich synthesis gas7 typically comprises H2and CO2. The hydrogenrich synthesis gas7 may also comprise carbon monoxide CO if only a partial or no water gas shift reaction takes place within thereaction chamber22. The hydrogen rich synthesis gas may also comprise further constituents. Thereaction chamber22 is surrounded by aheating reactor24, at least along majority of its length. Theheating reactor24 ofFIG. 2acomprises burners (not shown inFIG. 2a) for heating the reaction chamber, either directly or by heating the outer walls of theheating reactor24. The burners use fuel5 (seeFIG. 1) input into the reaction chamber, and effluent gas from the combustion is output asoutput stream8. Alternatively, aheating reactor24 may heat thereaction chamber22 by convection or heat exchange with hot gas. The membrane within thereformer device20 is not shown inFIG. 2; the membrane is shown inFIGS. 3a-3d.
FIGS. 3a-3dare schematic drawings of exemplary reaction chambers of a reformer device according to the invention. It should be noted that the relative dimensions of the reaction chambers are not to scale inFIGS. 3a-3d. Instead the dimensions ofFIGS. 3a-3dare changed in order to show the features thereof most clearly.
FIG. 3ais a schematic drawing of anexemplary reaction chamber22 of a reformer device according20 to the invention. The reaction chamber of the reformer device of the invention may be one out of a plurality of reaction chambers, e.g. one out of a plurality of steam reformer tubes. The embodiment shown inFIG. 3ais an inner diffusion chamber with a co-current flow of sweep gas.
Thereaction chamber22 comprises amembrane25 extending along all of a longitudinal axis (not shown inFIG. 3a) of thereaction chamber22. As showed inFIG. 3a, themembrane25 is placed as an inner tube within the reaction chamber so that during operation of the reformer device of the invention, CO2will diffuse from outside the inner tube into the inner tube as indicated by the horizontal arrows inFIG. 3a. Themembrane25 thus defines aninner diffusion chamber28. Thereaction chamber22 surrounding theinner diffusion chamber28 comprisescatalyst material26 arranged to catalyze both a steam methane reforming reaction and a water gas shift reaction. Thecatalyst material26 is thus confined to the space between themembrane25 and the inner wall of thereaction22. In a cross-section perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of thereaction chamber22, this space is an annular space.
Theinner diffusion chamber28 has aninlet1′ to admit a sweep gas arranged to sweep CO2diffused into the diffusion chamber through thediffusion chamber28 and out through anoutlet7′ from thediffusion chamber28. As an example only, the sweep gas may be N2or H2O. However, the sweep gas could be any appropriate gas. The diameter of the inner tube formed by themembrane25 influences the production of hydrogen rich synthesis gas. Increasing the membrane diameter or the inner tube diameter will cause an increase in the production of hydrogen rich synthesis gas (syngas). Thereaction chamber22 moreover comprises aninlet1 for supply stream of hydrocarbon stream, e.g. natural gas CH4and H2O, and anoutlet7 for outletting hydrogen rich synthesis gas (syngas).
FIG. 3bis a schematic drawing of anexemplary reaction chamber22′ of areformer device20 according to the invention. Thereaction chamber22′ of the reformer device of the invention may be one out of a plurality of reaction chambers, e.g. one out of a plurality of steam reformer tubes. The embodiment shown inFIG. 3bis an outer diffusion chamber with a co-current flow of sweep gas.
Thereaction chamber22′ comprises amembrane25′ extending along all of a longitudinal axis (not shown inFIG. 3b) of thereaction chamber22′.
As showed inFIG. 3b, themembrane25′ is placed as an inner tube within the reaction chamber. The inner tube of thereaction chamber22′ as confined by themembrane25′ comprisescatalyst material26′ arranged to catalyze both a steam methane reforming reaction and a water gas shift reaction. Thus, in contrast to the embodiment shown inFIG. 3a, the inner tube of thereaction chamber22′ as confined by themembrane25′ is the reaction zone of thereaction chamber22′, whilst the space as defined between themembrane25′ and the inner wall of thereaction chamber22′ along the longitudinal axis of thereaction chamber22′ constitutes thediffusion chamber28′.
Theinlet1 for inletting a hydrocarbon stream, e.g. natural gas CH4and H2O, is an inlet into the inner tube created by themembrane25′, and anoutlet7 for outletting hydrogen rich synthesis gas (syngas) is also from the inner tube, since in the embodiment ofFIG. 3bCO2diffuses out from inside the inner tube, as indicated by the horizontal arrows inFIG. 3b, into thediffusion chamber28′ between the inner tube and the inside of thereaction chamber22′.
Thus, themembrane25′ defines aouter diffusion chamber28′, theouter diffusion chamber28′ having aninlet1′ to admit a sweep gas arranged to sweep CO2diffused into the diffusion chamber out through thediffusion chamber28′ and out through anoutlet7′ from thediffusion chamber28′. As an example only, the sweep gas may be N2or H2O. The diameter of the inner tube formed by themembrane25′ influences the production of hydrogen rich synthesis gas. Increasing the membrane diameter or the inner tube diameter will cause an increase in the production of hydrogen rich synthesis gas (syngas).
FIG. 3cis a schematic drawing of anexemplary reaction chamber22″ of a reformer device according to the invention. Again, thereaction chamber22″ of thereformer device20 of the invention may be one out of a plurality of reaction chambers, e.g. one out of a plurality of steam reformer tubes. As in the embodiments ofFIGS. 3aand 3b, thereaction chamber22″ comprises amembrane25″ extending along all of a longitudinal axis (not shown inFIG. 3c) of thereaction chamber22″. The embodiment shown inFIG. 3cis an inner diffusion chamber with a counter-current flow of sweep gas.
As showed inFIG. 3c, themembrane25″ is placed as an inner tube within the reaction chamber so that during operation of the reformer device of the invention, CO2will diffuse from outside the inner tube into the inner tube as indicated with the horizontal arrows. Themembrane25″ thus defines aninner diffusion chamber28″. Thereaction chamber22″ surrounding theinner diffusion chamber28″ comprisescatalyst material26″ arranged to catalyze both a steam methane reforming reaction and a water gas shift reaction. Thecatalyst material26″ is thus confined to the space between themembrane25″ and the inner wall of thereaction22″. In a cross-section perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of thereaction chamber22″, this space withcatalyst material26″ is an annular space.
Theinner diffusion chamber28″ has aninlet1″ to admit a sweep gas arranged to sweep CO2diffused into the diffusion chamber out through anoutlet7″ from thediffusion chamber28″. As an example only, the sweep gas may be N2or H2O. Thereaction chamber22″ moreover comprises aninlet1 for supply stream of hydrocarbon stream, e.g. natural gas CH4and H2O, and anoutlet7 for outletting hydrogen rich synthesis gas (syngas).
The difference between the embodiments shown inFIGS. 3band 3dis that in the embodiment ofFIG. 3b, the sweep gas and the reactant gas to flow co-currently, whilst the sweep gas and the reactant gas flow counter-currently in the embodiment shown inFIG. 3c.
FIG. 3dis a schematic drawing of anexemplary reaction chamber22′″ of a reformer device according to the invention. Again, thereaction chamber22″′ of thereformer device20 of the invention may be one out of a plurality of reaction chambers, e.g. one out of a plurality of steam reformer tubes. Thereaction chamber22″′ comprises amembrane25″′ extending along all of a longitudinal axis (not shown inFIG. 3d) of thereaction chamber22″′. The embodiment shown inFIG. 3dis an outer diffusion chamber with a counter-current flow of sweep gas.
The inner tube of thereaction chamber22″′ as confined by themembrane25′″ comprisescatalyst material26″′ arranged to catalyze both a steam methane reforming reaction and a water gas shift reaction. Thus, the inner tube of thereaction chamber22″′ as confined by themembrane25″′ is the reaction zone of thereaction chamber22″′, whilst the space as defined between themembrane25″′ and the inner wall of thereaction chamber22″′ along the longitudinal axis of thereaction chamber22″′ constitutes thediffusion chamber28′″.
Thus, themembrane25″′ defines aouter diffusion chamber28′″, theouter diffusion chamber28′″ having aninlet1″′ to admit a sweep gas arranged to sweep CO2diffused into the diffusion chamber through theouter diffusion chamber28″′ and out through anoutlet7′″ from theouter diffusion chamber28′″. As an example only, the sweep gas may be N2or H2O. Thereaction chamber22″′ moreover comprises aninlet1 for supply stream of hydrocarbon stream, e.g. natural gas CH4and H2O, and anoutlet7 for outletting hydrogen rich synthesis gas (syngas). In the embodiment ofFIG. 3d, CO2diffuses out from inside the reaction zone or inner tube as defined by themembrane25″′, as indicated by the horizontal arrows inFIG. 3d, into theouter diffusion chamber28″′ defined between the inner tube and the inside of thereaction chamber22′″.
The difference between the embodiments shown inFIGS. 3band 3dis that in the embodiment ofFIG. 3b, the sweep gas and the reactant gas to flow co-currently, whilst the sweep gas and the reactant gas flow counter-currently in the embodiment shown inFIG. 3d.
FIG. 4 is a graph depicting the reactor temperature within a reaction chamber of the invention as a function of the efficiency of a membrane in the reaction chamber of the invention. The graph ofFIG. 4 shows the result of a simulation of how the exit temperature from the reaction chamber can be decreased from 950° C., which is a typical outlet temperature from a conventional reformer, to a temperature of below 700° C. in a reformer of the invention, operating with an efficient membrane which continuously removes CO2from the product gas and still produces the same amount of hydrogen. The membrane efficiency is indicated in arbitrary units ([a.u.]).
FIG. 5 is a graph depicting an increase in H2production as a function of the CO2permeance of the membrane in a reaction chamber of the invention.
FIG. 5 shows that the hydrogen production yield can be increased in a reaction chamber of a reformer device, with a CO2membrane, compared to a reaction chamber operated at similar conditions, but without the membrane.FIG. 5 also shows calculations of the increase in hydrogen production yield in a case, where the membrane is only provided in the most downstream one third of the reaction chamber. Simulations have revealed that intensive removal of CO2from the upstream part of the reaction chamber leads to decreasing production of hydrogen rich synthesis gas, especially in the case of a sweep gas in co-current with the reactant gas. This is because CO2removal in this part shifts the water gas swift reaction toward the “CO2+H2” side (see reactions (2) and (4)), resulting in removal of water and therefore a decreasing potential for methane conversion in the steam reforming reaction (see reactions (1) and (3)).
FIG. 5 show that a design where the membrane is provided in the most downstream one third of the reaction chamber has the same efficiency as a similar reaction chamber with a membrane throughout the whole length of the reaction chamber for permeance values above 7.5 kmol/m2/h/atm. This is noteworthy in relation to cost considerations in that expenses for a CO2membrane can be high.
Finally, calculations have shown that increasing the sweep gas flow when using membrane material having a high permeance increases the hydrogen production further.

Claims (12)

The invention claimed is:
1. A reformer device comprising a reaction chamber for carrying out a reaction having a hydrocarbon stream as a reactant gas and with hydrogen rich synthesis gas as a reaction product, wherein a membrane is provided within the reaction chamber, said reformer device further comprising a heating reactor for heating the reaction chamber,
wherein
a. the membrane is a semi-permeable membrane arranged to allow CO2pass through it,
b. the reaction chamber comprises a catalyst material arranged to catalyze a steam methane reforming reaction and to catalyze a water gas shift reaction, and
c. the reformer device is arranged to carry out the steam methane reforming reaction at a pressure between about 25 and about 50 barg within the reaction chamber.
2. A reformer device according toclaim 1, wherein the membrane defines an inner diffusion chamber, the inner diffusion chamber having an inlet to admit a sweep gas arranged to sweep CO2diffused into the diffusion chamber out through an outlet from the diffusion chamber.
3. A reformer device according toclaim 1, wherein the membrane defines an inner reaction chamber and an outer diffusion chamber, the outer diffusion chamber having an inlet to admit a sweep gas arranged to sweep CO2diffused into the diffusion chamber out through an outlet from the diffusion chamber.
4. A reformer device according toclaim 2, arranged to allow the sweep gas and the reactant gas to flow in countercurrent.
5. A reformer device according toclaim 1, wherein the permeance of the CO2membrane is above about 1 kmol/m2/h/atm.
6. A reformer device according toclaim 1, wherein the membrane is only provided in a most downstream half of the reaction chamber.
7. A reformer device according toclaim 1, wherein the temperature within the reformer device during steam reforming is below about 800° C.
8. A reformer device according toclaim 1, wherein the reformer device is a fired reformer, a radiant wall reformer, a convective reformer, or an autothermal reformer.
9. A reformer device according toclaim 1, wherein the membrane is only provided in a most downstream third of the reaction chamber.
10. A reformer device according toclaim 1, wherein the membrane is only provided in a most downstream fourth of the reaction chamber.
11. A reformer device according toclaim 1, wherein the temperature within the reformer device during steam reforming is below about 700° C.
12. A reformer device according toclaim 1, wherein the reformer device is arranged to carry out the steam methane reforming reaction at a pressure between about 30 and about 50 barg within the reaction chamber.
US15/564,5212015-04-082016-03-31Reformer device comprising a CO2 membraneActive2036-06-06US10647573B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application NumberPriority DateFiling DateTitle
DKPA2015002142015-04-08
DK2015002142015-04-08
DKPA2015002142015-04-08
PCT/EP2016/057092WO2016162263A1 (en)2015-04-082016-03-31Reformer device comprising a co2 membrane

Publications (2)

Publication NumberPublication Date
US20180079643A1 US20180079643A1 (en)2018-03-22
US10647573B2true US10647573B2 (en)2020-05-12

Family

ID=55642493

Family Applications (1)

Application NumberTitlePriority DateFiling Date
US15/564,521Active2036-06-06US10647573B2 (en)2015-04-082016-03-31Reformer device comprising a CO2 membrane

Country Status (8)

CountryLink
US (1)US10647573B2 (en)
EP (1)EP3280679B1 (en)
JP (2)JP2018512368A (en)
KR (1)KR102341960B1 (en)
CN (1)CN107428528B (en)
EA (1)EA038495B1 (en)
SA (1)SA517390108B1 (en)
WO (1)WO2016162263A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
AT517934B1 (en)*2016-04-282017-06-15Mair Christian Plant and process for the gas compression-free recovery and storage of carbon in energy storage systems
WO2019181687A1 (en)*2018-03-232019-09-26住友精化株式会社Hydrogen production device and hydrogen production method
JP2021017380A (en)*2019-07-182021-02-15株式会社デンソーFuel reforming system
MX2022010245A (en)*2020-02-282022-09-19Topsoe As METHOD FOR THE PREPARATION OF SYNTHESIS GAS.
US11492255B2 (en)2020-04-032022-11-08Saudi Arabian Oil CompanySteam methane reforming with steam regeneration
US11322766B2 (en)2020-05-282022-05-03Saudi Arabian Oil CompanyDirect hydrocarbon metal supported solid oxide fuel cell
US11639290B2 (en)2020-06-042023-05-02Saudi Arabian Oil CompanyDry reforming of methane with carbon dioxide at elevated pressure
US11492254B2 (en)2020-06-182022-11-08Saudi Arabian Oil CompanyHydrogen production with membrane reformer
US11583824B2 (en)2020-06-182023-02-21Saudi Arabian Oil CompanyHydrogen production with membrane reformer
US11999619B2 (en)2020-06-182024-06-04Saudi Arabian Oil CompanyHydrogen production with membrane reactor
US12220666B2 (en)2021-01-122025-02-11Saudi Arabian Oil CompanyUltrathin membrane fabrication
US11787759B2 (en)2021-08-122023-10-17Saudi Arabian Oil CompanyDimethyl ether production via dry reforming and dimethyl ether synthesis in a vessel
US12258272B2 (en)2021-08-122025-03-25Saudi Arabian Oil CompanyDry reforming of methane using a nickel-based bi-metallic catalyst
US11718575B2 (en)2021-08-122023-08-08Saudi Arabian Oil CompanyMethanol production via dry reforming and methanol synthesis in a vessel
US11578016B1 (en)2021-08-122023-02-14Saudi Arabian Oil CompanyOlefin production via dry reforming and olefin synthesis in a vessel
US11617981B1 (en)2022-01-032023-04-04Saudi Arabian Oil CompanyMethod for capturing CO2 with assisted vapor compression
KR20250032129A (en)*2023-08-302025-03-07(주)부흥산업사A method for reforming any reducing gas for production of syngas and its reforming process system

Citations (29)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
WO1999006138A1 (en)1997-08-011999-02-11Exxon Research And Engineering CompanyCo2-selective membrane process and system for reforming a fuel to hydrogen for a fuel cell
US6090312A (en)1996-01-312000-07-18Ziaka; Zoe D.Reactor-membrane permeator process for hydrocarbon reforming and water gas-shift reactions
US20030066239A1 (en)*2001-10-052003-04-10Iraj ParchamazadPortable cogeneration fuel-cell power generator with high-yield, low pressure reformer for recreational vehicles
WO2003072493A1 (en)2002-02-272003-09-04Volvo Technology CorporationSystem for generating hydrogen fuel to a fuel cell
WO2004069739A1 (en)2003-02-052004-08-19Siemens AktiengesellschaftMethod and device for separating co2 contained in an h2-based gaseous mixture
JP2004244275A (en)2003-02-142004-09-02Corona CorpMethod and apparatus for producing high-purity hydrogen from hydrocarbon fuel
US20070024057A1 (en)2005-07-282007-02-01Jaswinder SehmbiConduit assembly and method of making same
WO2007142518A1 (en)2006-05-042007-12-13Stichting Energieonderzoek Centrum NederlandA reactor device, and a method for carrying out a reaction with hydrogen as reaction product
US20090101008A1 (en)2007-10-182009-04-23Lackner Klaus SCarbon dioxide permeable membrane
US20100129284A1 (en)*2007-03-292010-05-27Nippon Oil CorporationMethod and apparatus for producing hydrogen and recovering carbon dioxide
US20100152900A1 (en)*2008-10-102010-06-17Exxonmobil Research And Engineering CompanyOptimizing refinery hydrogen gas supply, distribution and consumption in real time
US20100260657A1 (en)*2007-07-272010-10-14Nippon Oil CorporationMethod and apparatus for hydrogen production and carbon dioxide recovery
US7938893B2 (en)2006-04-182011-05-10Gas Technology InstituteMembrane reactor for H2S, CO2 and H2 separation
US20110168572A1 (en)2010-01-122011-07-14University Of South CarolinaComposite Mixed Carbonate Ion and Electron Conducting Membranes and Reactant Gas Assisted Chemical Reactors for CO2 Separation and Capture
US20120014852A1 (en)2010-07-132012-01-19Kevin HuangMembranes and Reactors for CO2 Separation
US20120039794A1 (en)2009-01-302012-02-16Johnson Matthey PlcHydrogen process
US20120121497A1 (en)*2010-11-112012-05-17Air Liquide Large Industries U.S. LpProcess For Recovering Hydrogen And Carbon Dioxide
US20120118011A1 (en)*2010-11-112012-05-17Air Liquide Large Industries U.S. LpProcess For The Production Of Hydrogen And Carbon Dioxide
WO2012086836A1 (en)2010-12-242012-06-28株式会社ルネッサンス・エナジー・リサーチGas separation device, membrane reactor, and hydrogen production device
US20120291483A1 (en)*2011-05-182012-11-22Air Liquide Large Industries U.S. LpProcess For Recovering Hydrogen And Carbon Dioxide
US20120292574A1 (en)*2011-05-182012-11-22Air Liquide Large Industries U.S. LpProcess For The Production Of Hydrogen And Carbon Dioxide
US20130072583A1 (en)*2010-05-102013-03-21Neste Oil OyiMethod of producing a hydrocarbon composition
US8430938B1 (en)*2006-07-132013-04-30The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The NavyControl algorithm for autothermal reformer
US20140170061A1 (en)*2012-12-182014-06-19L'Air Liquide Societe Anonyme Pour l'Etude et l'Exploitation des Precedes Georges ClaudeStaged membrane process for high pressure hydrogen production
US20140264176A1 (en)2013-03-142014-09-18Membrane Technology And Research, Inc.Membrane-Based Gas Separation Processes to Produce Synthesis Gas With a High CO Content
US20140357737A1 (en)*2011-09-152014-12-04Peter Edward James AbbottSynthesis gas and fischer tropsch integrated process
US20150047989A1 (en)2013-08-162015-02-19University Of South CarolinaCombined co2 capture and conversion method and system
US20150090125A1 (en)2013-09-052015-04-02The Arizona Board Of Regents For And On Behalf Of Arizona State UniversityTubular ceramic-carbonate dual-phase membranes and methods of manufacture thereof
US20150323248A1 (en)*2012-04-072015-11-12L'air Liquide, Societe Anonyme Pour I'etude Et I'exploitation Des Procedes Georges ClaudeProcess for recovering hydrogen and capturing carbon dioxide

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
US7572318B2 (en)*2006-04-182009-08-11Gas Technology InstituteHigh-temperature membrane for CO2 and/or H2S separation
WO2009042244A1 (en)*2007-09-282009-04-02The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New YorkMethods and systems for generating hydgrogen and separating carbon dioxide
EP2199254A1 (en)*2008-12-112010-06-23BP p.l.c.Integrated gas refinery
JP2010189217A (en)*2009-02-172010-09-02Keio GijukuReformer and reforming method
JP2010235736A (en)*2009-03-312010-10-21Toyota Motor Corp Synthetic fuel production system
JP2012066961A (en)*2010-09-222012-04-05Idemitsu Kosan Co LtdMethod of generating hydrogen from hydrocarbon compound

Patent Citations (38)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
US6090312A (en)1996-01-312000-07-18Ziaka; Zoe D.Reactor-membrane permeator process for hydrocarbon reforming and water gas-shift reactions
WO1999006138A1 (en)1997-08-011999-02-11Exxon Research And Engineering CompanyCo2-selective membrane process and system for reforming a fuel to hydrogen for a fuel cell
JP2001511430A (en)1997-08-012001-08-14エクソンモービル リサーチ アンド エンジニアリング カンパニー CO2 selective membrane process and system for reforming fuel to hydrogen for fuel cells
US6579331B1 (en)1997-08-012003-06-17Exxonmobil Research And Engineering CompanyCO2-Selective membrane process and system for reforming a fuel to hydrogen for a fuel cell
US20030066239A1 (en)*2001-10-052003-04-10Iraj ParchamazadPortable cogeneration fuel-cell power generator with high-yield, low pressure reformer for recreational vehicles
US20050000161A1 (en)2002-02-272005-01-06Volvo Technology CorporationSystem for generating hydrogen fuel for a fuel cell
JP2005519012A (en)2002-02-272005-06-30ボルボ テクノロジー コーポレイション Hydrogen fuel generation system for fuel cells
CN1639057A (en)2002-02-272005-07-13沃尔沃技术公司System for generating hydrogen fuel to a fuel cell
WO2003072493A1 (en)2002-02-272003-09-04Volvo Technology CorporationSystem for generating hydrogen fuel to a fuel cell
JP2009179555A (en)2002-02-272009-08-13Volvo Technology CorpSystem for generating hydrogen fuel for fuel cell
WO2004069739A1 (en)2003-02-052004-08-19Siemens AktiengesellschaftMethod and device for separating co2 contained in an h2-based gaseous mixture
JP2004244275A (en)2003-02-142004-09-02Corona CorpMethod and apparatus for producing high-purity hydrogen from hydrocarbon fuel
US8163065B2 (en)2005-04-182012-04-24The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New YorkCarbon dioxide permeable membrane
US20070024057A1 (en)2005-07-282007-02-01Jaswinder SehmbiConduit assembly and method of making same
US7938893B2 (en)2006-04-182011-05-10Gas Technology InstituteMembrane reactor for H2S, CO2 and H2 separation
WO2007142518A1 (en)2006-05-042007-12-13Stichting Energieonderzoek Centrum NederlandA reactor device, and a method for carrying out a reaction with hydrogen as reaction product
US20100044642A1 (en)2006-05-042010-02-25Stichting Energieonderzoek Centrum NederlandReactor device, and a method for carrying out a reaction with hydrogen as reaction product
US8430938B1 (en)*2006-07-132013-04-30The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The NavyControl algorithm for autothermal reformer
US20100129284A1 (en)*2007-03-292010-05-27Nippon Oil CorporationMethod and apparatus for producing hydrogen and recovering carbon dioxide
US20100260657A1 (en)*2007-07-272010-10-14Nippon Oil CorporationMethod and apparatus for hydrogen production and carbon dioxide recovery
US20090101008A1 (en)2007-10-182009-04-23Lackner Klaus SCarbon dioxide permeable membrane
US20100152900A1 (en)*2008-10-102010-06-17Exxonmobil Research And Engineering CompanyOptimizing refinery hydrogen gas supply, distribution and consumption in real time
US20120039794A1 (en)2009-01-302012-02-16Johnson Matthey PlcHydrogen process
US20110168572A1 (en)2010-01-122011-07-14University Of South CarolinaComposite Mixed Carbonate Ion and Electron Conducting Membranes and Reactant Gas Assisted Chemical Reactors for CO2 Separation and Capture
US20130072583A1 (en)*2010-05-102013-03-21Neste Oil OyiMethod of producing a hydrocarbon composition
US20120014852A1 (en)2010-07-132012-01-19Kevin HuangMembranes and Reactors for CO2 Separation
US20120121497A1 (en)*2010-11-112012-05-17Air Liquide Large Industries U.S. LpProcess For Recovering Hydrogen And Carbon Dioxide
US20120118011A1 (en)*2010-11-112012-05-17Air Liquide Large Industries U.S. LpProcess For The Production Of Hydrogen And Carbon Dioxide
WO2012086836A1 (en)2010-12-242012-06-28株式会社ルネッサンス・エナジー・リサーチGas separation device, membrane reactor, and hydrogen production device
US20130287678A1 (en)2010-12-242013-10-31Renaissance Energy CorporationGas separation apparatus, membrane reactor, and hydrogen production apparatus
US20120292574A1 (en)*2011-05-182012-11-22Air Liquide Large Industries U.S. LpProcess For The Production Of Hydrogen And Carbon Dioxide
US20120291483A1 (en)*2011-05-182012-11-22Air Liquide Large Industries U.S. LpProcess For Recovering Hydrogen And Carbon Dioxide
US20140357737A1 (en)*2011-09-152014-12-04Peter Edward James AbbottSynthesis gas and fischer tropsch integrated process
US20150323248A1 (en)*2012-04-072015-11-12L'air Liquide, Societe Anonyme Pour I'etude Et I'exploitation Des Procedes Georges ClaudeProcess for recovering hydrogen and capturing carbon dioxide
US20140170061A1 (en)*2012-12-182014-06-19L'Air Liquide Societe Anonyme Pour l'Etude et l'Exploitation des Precedes Georges ClaudeStaged membrane process for high pressure hydrogen production
US20140264176A1 (en)2013-03-142014-09-18Membrane Technology And Research, Inc.Membrane-Based Gas Separation Processes to Produce Synthesis Gas With a High CO Content
US20150047989A1 (en)2013-08-162015-02-19University Of South CarolinaCombined co2 capture and conversion method and system
US20150090125A1 (en)2013-09-052015-04-02The Arizona Board Of Regents For And On Behalf Of Arizona State UniversityTubular ceramic-carbonate dual-phase membranes and methods of manufacture thereof

Non-Patent Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Danish Search Report dated Oct. 21, 2015, issued by the Danish Patent Office in the corresponding Danish Patent Application No. PA 2015 00214. (7 pages).
International Search Report (PCT/ISA/210) dated Jul. 8, 2016, by the European Patent Office as the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/EP2016/057092.
Lima, A.A.G. et al., "Composition effects on the activity of Cu-Zn0-Al203 based catalysts for the water gas shift reaction: A statistical approach", Applied Catalysis A: General, vol. 171, No. 1, pp. 31-43, Jun. 29, 1998, XP004271466.
LIMA, A.A.G. NELE, M. MORENO, E.L. ANDRADE, H.M.C.: "Composition effects on the activity of Cu-ZnO-Al"2O"3 based catalysts for the water gas shift reaction: A statistical approach", APPLIED CATALYSIS A: GENERAL, ELSEVIER, AMSTERDAM, NL, vol. 171, no. 1, 29 June 1998 (1998-06-29), AMSTERDAM, NL, pages 31 - 43, XP004271466, ISSN: 0926-860X, DOI: 10.1016/S0926-860X(98)00072-6
Office Action (First Office Action) dated Jun. 26, 2019, by the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201680020638.9 and an English Translation of the Office Action. (18 pages).
Office Action (Notice of Reasons for Refusal) dated Oct. 23, 2019, by the Japanese Patent Office in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-552985, and an English Translation of the Office Action. (10 pages).
Written Opinion (PCT/ISA/237) dated Jul. 8, 2016, by the European Patent Office as the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/EP2016/057092.
Wu, Exhibition 1: Flow chart for hydrogen production by methane steam reforming, in Hydrogen Energy and Hydrogen Producing Technologies, Zhejiang University Press, Sep. 30, 2014, pp. 65-66, (7 pages).
ZOU J, HUANG J, WINSTON W S: "CO2-Selective Water Gas Shift Membrane Reactor for Fuel Cell Hydrogen Processing", INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, vol. 46, no. 8, 11 April 2007 (2007-04-11), pages 2272 - 2279, XP002571135, ISSN: 0888-5885, DOI: 10.1021/ie0611453
Zou, J. et al., "C02-Selective Water Gas Shift Membrane Reactor for Fuel Cell Hydrogen Processing", Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, American Chemical Society, vol. 46, No. 8, pp. 2272-2279, Apr. 11, 2007, XP-002571135.

Also Published As

Publication numberPublication date
JP2021054714A (en)2021-04-08
EA201792192A1 (en)2018-05-31
KR102341960B1 (en)2021-12-23
KR20170134484A (en)2017-12-06
JP7096317B2 (en)2022-07-05
CN107428528A (en)2017-12-01
US20180079643A1 (en)2018-03-22
EP3280679B1 (en)2021-01-13
SA517390108B1 (en)2022-02-16
JP2018512368A (en)2018-05-17
WO2016162263A1 (en)2016-10-13
EA038495B1 (en)2021-09-07
EP3280679A1 (en)2018-02-14
CN107428528B (en)2021-09-10

Similar Documents

PublicationPublication DateTitle
US10647573B2 (en)Reformer device comprising a CO2 membrane
US11591214B2 (en)Process and system for producing synthesis gas
US12172896B2 (en)ATR-based hydrogen process and plant
US8580153B2 (en)Hydrogen production with reduced carbon dioxide generation and complete capture
IL271938B2 (en) A method for making synthesis gas
US9114352B2 (en)Staged membrane process for high pressure hydrogen production
AU2018308586A1 (en)Method for the preparation of ammonia synthesis gas
US9458013B1 (en)Process for the production of hydrogen
US20240101417A1 (en)Method for preparing a synthesis gas
KR102674399B1 (en) Systems and methods for producing synthesis gas
KR102517055B1 (en) Systems and methods for producing syngas
CN119894815A (en)ATR reforming
US10093541B2 (en)Process for producing synthesis gas
RU2664516C2 (en)Method and system for producing methanol using integrated oxygen transport membrane based reforming system
EP1441981B1 (en)Reactor for reformation of natural gas and simultaneous production of hydrogen
TW202502646A (en)Plant and process for producing hydrogen from hydrocarbons with reduced co emissions
EA040289B1 (en) SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SYNTHESIS GAS
EP3098197B1 (en)Process for the production of hydrogen
WO2025012699A1 (en)Plant and process for producing hydrogen from hydrocarbons with reduced co2 emissions
EA044781B1 (en) METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PRODUCING SYNTHESIS GAS

Legal Events

DateCodeTitleDescription
FEPPFee payment procedure

Free format text:ENTITY STATUS SET TO UNDISCOUNTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: BIG.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

ASAssignment

Owner name:HALDOR TOPSOEE A/S, DENMARK

Free format text:ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:OESTBERG, MARTIN;MORTENSEN, PETER MOELGAARD;SIGNING DATES FROM 20150428 TO 20150430;REEL/FRAME:043805/0117

ASAssignment

Owner name:HALDOR TOPSOEE A/S, DENMARK

Free format text:CHANGE OF ADDRESS OF ASSIGNEE;ASSIGNOR:HALDOR TOPSOEE A/S;REEL/FRAME:044169/0097

Effective date:20171010

STPPInformation on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text:DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

STPPInformation on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text:NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPPInformation on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text:RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPPInformation on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text:NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPPInformation on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text:NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS

STCFInformation on status: patent grant

Free format text:PATENTED CASE

ASAssignment

Owner name:TOPSOE A/S, DENMARK

Free format text:CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:HALDOR TOPSOEE A/S;REEL/FRAME:065385/0395

Effective date:20220412

MAFPMaintenance fee payment

Free format text:PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment:4


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp