- The present invention relates to a bridge inspection and maintenance system, comprising a mounted sliding platform below the bridge to be inspected. 
- The platform further comprises one or more sensors for acquiring images of said bridge. 
- The inspection of bridges generally takes place by monitoring the condition of the bridge parts, especially the parts below the bridge, using visual investigation methods and non-destructive testing, imaging means, such as cameras or the like, so that the processing of the acquired images allows to identify any structural defects or to predict breakages or damage to the bridge structure. 
- It is evident that this inspection cannot be carried out by an operator supported by vehicles placed on the ground below the bridge, as most defects would not be detected due to the operator's distance. 
- For this reason, the inspection of bridges currently requires the installation of solid structures which allow positioning the support means of the operator at the lower parts of the bridge, or requires the use of structures which can be fixed to the upper parts of the bridge, which however, at least temporarily require blocking the traffic of vehicles in transit on the bridge. 
- Alternatively, it is possible to envisage the use of aerial systems, but their use is generally subject to too many restrictions to allow for constant and effective monitoring, in order to detect the occurrence of problems. 
- As anticipated, the inspection of the bridge by visual inspection means is of great help for highlighting any damage in the initial phases of construction and during normal use of the bridge, but also for verifying the conformity of welds and geometry with respect to the project designs, immediately after construction. 
- Some current systems provide for automated monitoring and inspection, using robotic means, presenting different solutions related to small or large systems. 
- However, besides being particularly expensive, these solutions do not allow continuous monitoring of the status of the bridge. 
- Some state-of-the-art robotic solutions include the development of a mobile and autonomous manipulator for the maintenance of steel bridges, which allows the removal of paint and rust. This system consists of a platform adapted to support the manipulator, a computer, a laser scanner and several sensors. In this way the system can inspect the bridge and detect any defects. 
- However, this system is still ineffective. 
- Firstly, the rails on which the platform moves are part of the system and not of the bridge, which has negative repercussions on portability. Furthermore, since the platform is connected to the ground and not to the bridge to be monitored, the vibrations due to the vehicle traffic transiting on the bridge generate incorrect images, which do not correspond to the actual situation of the bridge and which cannot be reprocessed for proper inspection and possible intervention. 
- The presence of dust in the air, due to maintenance, also causes false detection by the sensors. 
- Lightweight and portable robots are also present in the state of the art, designed to allow the inspection of bridges. 
- Such systems are designed so that operators can easily carry such robots and use them through the use of a lifting system, such as for example a ladder, a crane, at the point to be monitored. These systems, equipped with a high-resolution camera, provide the operator with rapid information that can be immediately used to assess the condition of the bridge. However, since the presence of the operator is of fundamental importance for the connection of the robot to the bridge, this type of solution cannot be used on very high bridges or those which are not easily accessible. In addition, the robotic system, although capable of overcoming minimal obstacles, cannot bypass the bridge piers and, if necessary, must be moved manually. 
- There are several types of robotic bridge inspection systems, which move below the bridge surface, designed to carry out inspections and maintenance at specific points, but these systems are not currently able to collect data on the entire bridge in a continuous and systematic manner. The document CN 105507145 B-  discloses a known bridge inspection system. 
- A continuous and systematic scan not only allows to plan maintenance when a problem is detected, but also to predict the formation of defects in the bridge structure, thanks to the analysis of the data collected. 
- There is therefore an unmet need for state-of-the-art systems to solve the problems outlined above, in particular to create an inspection and maintenance system for bridges which allows continuous monitoring and accurate image acquisition, not influenced by the bridge type or structure or by the traffic of vehicles crossing the bridge, avoiding the presence of operators at the bridge parts to be monitored. 
- The present invention achieves the above aims by realizing a system as defined inclaim 1, in which the platform is formed by two structures positioned symmetrically with respect to the longitudinal axis of the bridge. 
- Furthermore, each structure comprises a first part configured to translate along a longitudinal axis of the bridge on a corresponding longitudinal guide integral with the bridge and a second part configured to transversely translate with respect to said longitudinal axis on the first part on a corresponding transverse guide. 
- Thanks to this configuration, the two structures can be moved from a closed configuration, in which the corresponding second parts are coupled to each other at the central longitudinal axis of the bridge, to an open configuration, in which the two second parts are separated from each other in the opposite direction with respect to the centre of the central longitudinal axis of the bridge, until they are decoupled from each other, by a transverse translational movement. 
- The system object of the present invention allows carrying out inspections of the areas below the bridges in a continuous and rapid manner. 
- The fact that the structures are fixed directly to the bridge, through the first parts, so as to be integral with the bridge structure, allows the system object of the present invention to acquire images which are not affected by the vibrations of the bridge. 
- Imaging sensors, such as cameras, therefore detect precise images of the bridge structure, so as not only to obtain constant and effective monitoring, but also to identify the current state of maintenance and obtain a prediction about future interventions, necessary to prevent possible damage. 
- In addition, the possibility of reconfiguring the structure from open to closed configuration and vice versa allows different functions to be performed. 
- By operating the structure in open configuration, it is possible to scan the underlying parts of the bridge quickly. 
- Thanks to its unique configuration and the presence of sensors for the acquisition of images in each of the second parts of each individual structure, the system object of the present invention does not require any type of support structures for the mounting on the bridge or for the operation thereof: it is therefore possible to carry out continuous monitoring, also during normal use conditions of the bridge by vehicles. 
- Furthermore, as will be described in detail below, in closed configuration the two second parts form a single platform, capable of supporting further robotic means for the cleaning, thorough inspection and/or maintenance of the bridge. 
- Sliding along the bridge, the two structures can switch from the closed configuration to the open configuration whenever they are located at a bridge pier or whenever necessary, so that the first parts can slide independently without the obstruction of the piers and without interrupting the monitoring of the bridge. 
- It is also apparent that the system object of the present invention is preferably realized for automatic operation, possibly under the supervision of a user who controls the system remotely. 
- As anticipated, the system is integral with the bridge, so in combination with the latter, it allows the realization of a sort of "smart bridge", that is, a bridge which comprises sensors aimed at detecting structural anomalies and which can process structural information to allow the real-time monitoring of the bridge status and predict future damage. 
- According to a preferred embodiment, each second part has an upper guide adapted to support robotic inspection and/or maintenance and/or cleaning means. 
- When the second parts are in coupled configuration, the upper guides identify a single upper guide. 
- The system object of the present invention is therefore able to collect data from the sensors incorporated into the structure on a very rapid regular basis when in open configuration, at the same time, it is able to offer support to other robotic devices which perform dedicated and more accurate inspections, maintenance and cleaning, when in closed configuration. 
- Robotic vehicles can, of course, offer a wide range of machining which can be carried out on the bridge, depending on the tools which are provided on these robotic vehicles. 
- In addition, the creation of a single platform, consisting of the coupling of the two second parts, allows to obtain a weight support structure of these robotic means, which therefore do not have to support their own weight, resulting in a more agile handling of the same during the machining. 
- According to one embodiment, the ends of said second parts facing the central longitudinal axis of the bridge have complementary profiles, so that in a coupled configuration of the two second parts, the profiles of the corresponding ends are in contact by shape coupling. 
- An innovative system of joining the parts is obtained, which allows quick and easy couplings and decouplings. 
- To improve the coupling, a mechanical, shape coupling system is used, simple from a constructive point of view and particularly solid without the need to use electronic devices, which can be damaged during the movement of the parts or increase the risk of breakages or malfunctions of the entire system. 
- Advantageously, to improve the coupling of the first and the second part, it is possible to provide a sensor system adapted to check that the first part and the second part are aligned with respect to the longitudinal axis of the bridge. 
- According to a refinement of the variant just described, one end has a convex profile along a vertical section plane in the direction of the centre of the bridge, while the other end has a concave profile along a vertical section plane in the direction of the centre of the bridge. 
- As will be more apparent from the illustration of some embodiments, the convex, or pointed, end encompasses the other as one second portion approaches the other. 
- The interpenetration of one end with the other allows to obtain a perfect coupling of the parts, in order to achieve a precise alignment of the upper guides, for an easy transition from one part of the robotic means to the other. 
- Advantageously, the longitudinal guides are arranged at the sides of the bridge. 
- In this way, a slim, lightweight and easy-to-install construction of the system of the present invention is obtained. 
- To pursue the same objects, according to a possible embodiment, the second portions are arranged lower than the first portions. 
- This configuration also facilitates the movement of the second parts, as their dimensions do not create obstacles to the movement of the same with respect to the first parts. 
- As anticipated, the possibility of switching from the open configuration to the closed configuration not only has advantages aimed at overcoming the bridge piers, but also has advantages from the functional point of view. 
- In fact, in closed configuration, the system is able to use robotic means to perform specific machining and to obtain more accurate images. 
- For this reason, the present invention also relates to a method of bridge inspection and maintenance, as defined in claim 6 and which provides for the use of the system described above. 
- The method object of the present invention comprises the following steps: 
- a) translation of at least one of the two structures along the bridge and acquisition of images of the bridge, through scanning by the second part belonging to the translating structure: the two structures are in open configuration,
- b) image processing,
- c) positioning the second parts in open or closed configuration based on the processing of the previous step.
- The two structures, which move separately in open configuration, can scan the parts below the bridge at high speed, collect these images and process them. 
- Thanks to the independent movement, the two structures can perform translations and imaging of the bridge at different times and/or in different bridge areas. 
- Preferably, in fact, the step a) of translation takes place so that the two structures can move independently and non-aligned, so as to monitor different sections of the bridge positioned along the longitudinal axis thereof. 
- The first parts can therefore only deal with the movement of the structures, while the second parts deal with the detection of images, thanks to the presence of the sensors. 
- The processing means may be provided integrated within the first or second portions, or may be provided remotely, connected to the structures via wireless communication. 
- If the image processing requires more accurate maintenance or analysis in one or more specific areas, both structures may be positioned at said areas and the second parts may be coupled, so as to form a single platform. 
- Once the second parts are in coupled configuration, it is possible to provide, if necessary, the intervention of the robotic means described above, to obtain greater accuracy in the images acquired, or to carry out any type of machining. 
- Increasing the accuracy of the images captured not only allows to identify any problems or damage to the bridge in a timely manner, but also to predict future wear or decay of bridge parts. 
- It is evident that the method object of the present invention is a method of controlling the inspection system described above, whereby, according to this method, the transition from the open configuration to the closed configuration and vice versa is carried out not only to allow the formation of a single support platform for further robotic means operating on the parts below the bridge, but whenever the two structures are located at a pier. 
- These and other features and advantages of the present invention will become clearer from the following description of some non-limiting exemplary embodiments illustrated in the attached drawings in which: 
- figures 1a and 1b illustrate the system object of the present invention according to a possible embodiment, in open configuration;
- figures 2a and 2b illustrate the system object of the present invention according to a possible embodiment, in closed configuration;
- figure 3 illustrates a possible implementation variant of the guides for handling the first and second parts belonging to the system object of the present invention;
- figure 4 illustrates, through a flow chart, the method of the present invention in accordance with a possible embodiment;
- figures 5a and 5b illustrate two perspective views of a detail relative to the second part belonging to the system object of the present invention.
- It is specified that the figures annexed to the present patent application indicate some preferred embodiments of the system and method object of the present invention to better understand their advantages and characteristi cs. 
- Such embodiments are therefore for illustrative purposes only and not limited to the inventive concept of the present invention, that is, of realizing a bridge inspection system, which allows a continuous monitoring of the bridge conditions and which allows an acquisition of images of the bridge to be inspected which are not affected by the traffic of vehicles transiting on the bridge, ensuring a rapid and effective acquisition. 
- With particular reference tofigures 1a to 2b, the bridge inspection andmaintenance system 10 comprises twostructures 1, 2 positioned symmetrically with respect to the longitudinal axis A of thebridge 10 which are slidably mounted below thebridge 10. 
- The twostructures 1, 2 further comprise one or more sensors for acquiring images of thebridge 10. 
- Such sensors are not illustrated in the figure, but may consist of common imaging sensors, such as video cameras, photo cameras or the like, and are integrated within the twostructures 1 and 2. 
- Such sensors thus allow images of thebridge 10 to be acquired, in particular of the areas below the roadway of thebridge 10, which can be more easily damaged. 
- The translation of the twostructures 1 and 2 along the direction of the longitudinal axis A of thebridge 10 therefore allows to acquire images of the entire area below the roadway of thebridge 10. 
- As anticipated, the twostructures 1 and 2 are symmetrical with respect to the longitudinal axis A of the bridge, and each structure comprises a first part, respectively 11 and 21, and a second part, respectively 12 and 22. 
- Thefirst parts 11 and 21 are configured to move along a longitudinal axis of thebridge 10 on a correspondinglongitudinal guide 13, 23, integral with thebridge 10. 
- In particular, thelongitudinal guides 13 and 23 are positioned at the sides of thebridge 10, as clearly illustrated infigures 1b and2b. 
- Furthermore, eachsecond part 12 and 22 is configured to translate transversely with respect to the longitudinal axis A, on the correspondingfirst part 11, 21 through a transverse guide, illustrated and described below infigure 3. 
- The combination of the longitudinal guides and the transverse guides allows eachstructure 1 and 2 to move in the directions indicated by arrows B and C offigures 1b and2b. 
- In particular, thefirst parts 11 and 21 move along the entire length of thebridge 10, arrow B, while thesecond parts 12 and 22 provide for a mutual approach/distancing movement, arrow C. 
- The movement of thesecond parts 12 and 22 allows to identify a closed configuration, in which thesecond parts 12 and 22 are in a configuration coupled to each other, to an open configuration, in which the twosecond parts 12 and 22, sliding transversely in the opposite direction with respect to the axis A, are decoupled from each other. 
- Figures 1a and 1b illustrate the open configuration, whilefigures 2a and 2b illustrate the closed configuration. 
- The transition from the closed configuration to the open configuration and vice versa will be described below, through a flow chart relating to the method object of the present invention. 
- However, it may be noted that one of the criteria for switching from the closed configuration to the open configuration is the presence of apier 100 of thebridge 10. 
- As illustrated infigures 1a and 1b, the twostructures 1 and 2 are located at a pier 100: in order to allow the two structures to slide longitudinally, the twosecond parts 12 and 22 slide transversely towards the sides of thebridge 10, so that the twostructures 1 and 2 can translate laterally with respect to thepier 100. 
- From the figures it can be seen that in the open configuration, the twostructures 1 and 2 move along thebridge 10 in parallel, that is, side by side with each other. 
- However, it is possible to provide that the twostructures 1 and 2 can be independently controlled, to monitor different parts of thebridge 10, positioned in a different longitudinal direction. 
- Furthermore, thefirst parts 11 and 21 preferably are small compared to thesecond parts 12 and 22. 
- According to a refinement, in fact, thefirst parts 11 and 21 act as a support for thesecond parts 12 and 22, with the sole purpose of allowing the latter to be dragged in the direction of the longitudinal axis A of thebridge 10. 
- Thesecond parts 12 and 22 instead comprise the imaging sensors and, according to a preferred embodiment, eachsecond part 12, 22 has an upper guide adapted to support robotic means of inspection, and/or maintenance and/or cleaning. 
- In coupled configuration of thesecond parts 12 and 22, the upper guides identify a single upper guide. 
- The longitudinal guides of thefirst parts 11, 21, the transverse guides of thesecond parts 12, 22 and the upper guides may be realized in any of the ways known in the state of the art. 
- All these guides must allow the various parts to be moved as previously described. 
- Figure 3 illustrates a possible embodiment of such guides. 
- Referring tofigure 3, a view of one of the two structures is illustrated, e.g., of thestructure 1, in which thefirst part 11 and thesecond part 12 are provided. 
- Thesecond part 12 has twotransverse guides 122 adapted to allow the movement of thesecond part 12 with respect to the first part 11 (arrow C) and anupper guide 123 adapted to support robotic means of inspection, and/or maintenance and/or cleaning, not illustrated in the figure. 
- In coupled configuration of thesecond parts 12 and 22, the latter form a single platform, so that the robotic means can move from one second part to the other, using the upper guides 123. 
- The sliding of thefirst parts 11, 21 on the longitudinal guides positioned along the sides of thebridge 10 can take place thanks to standard means such as wheels or cables. The longitudinal guides can simply be realized with standard steel profiles. 
- The sliding of thesecond parts 12, 22 on thefirst parts 11, 21 takes place thanks to theracks 122 fixed to thesecond parts 12, 22, moving thanks to the sprockets 124 fixed to thefirst parts 11, 21. 
- In addition, the robotic means slide through anotherrack 123 fixed to thesecond parts 12, 22, on which a sprocket connected to said robotic means is fixed. 
- The robotic means can be of different nature: they can be dedicated to inspection tests, for example by providing additional cameras with respect to the sensors of the second parts, cleaning or other maintenance work. 
- The robotic means are moved from one side to the other of the bridge 10 (i.e., thesecond parts 12, 22) in a standard manner, thanks to the perfect continuity of theupper guides 123 positioned on the second parts. 
- The system object of the present invention is generally fully automatic, but is also manually operable, through specific tools, if the emergency recovery of the system is necessary. 
- During normal operation, therefore, the system object of the present invention is fully automatic and/or operated remotely, and the remote supervision of one or more operators can be provided. 
- An embodiment of the bridge inspection method of the present invention is illustrated infigure 4. 
- This method involves the use of the system described above. 
- Assuming to start with the twostructures 1 and 2 in open configuration,step 40, these structures are moved, separately or in combination, in the area below the main roadway of the bridge to be inspected. 
- Once in position, the scan takes place,step 41, through the sensors positioned on thestructures 1 and 2. 
- The scan performed by thestructures 1 and 2 in open configuration is carried out quickly, thanks to the speed of movement of the twostructures 1 and 2. 
- The data acquired during the scan,step 41, is collected and can be processed through artificial intelligence algorithms, which can be used both to identify the bridge status and to predict future interventions. 
- Subsequently,step 42, an analysis of the data collected instep 41 is performed to verify the presence of problems which require more accurate maintenance or investigation. In the absence of these problems, the scanning continues on another area of the bridge always in open configuration. 
- If the twostructures 1 and 2 move independently, two different areas of the bridge can be inspected, speeding up the monitoring of the same, concentrating the inspection of both structures only at points identified as particularly deteriorated, or requiring maintenance. 
- Regardless of the combined or independent movement of the two structures, if problems are detected, thesecond parts 12 and 22 are moved transversely, until they reach the coupled configuration and the corresponding closed configuration,step 45, of thestructures 1 and 2. 
- Obviously, during the independent movement of the twostructures 1 and 2, the twostructures 1 and 2 must first be aligned, to allow the second parts to be configured in closed condition. 
- Such configuration allows a single platform to be formed capable of supporting further robotic means, step 46, which perform more accurate inspections, maintenance and/or cleaning depending on the problems detected instep 42. 
- The presence of problems, i.e. the discriminant, which allows to assess whether it is necessary to intervene with dedicated robotic devices, can be established either through specific image processing algorithms, or manually, through the judgement of an operator, also in real time. 
- According to the embodiment illustrated infigure 4, before reaching the closed configuration,step 45, the system detects if it is located at a pier, which would not allow the movement of the second parts towards the central longitudinal axis of the bridge. 
- The detection of a pier may, for example, be carried out with proximity sensors. 
- If a pier is detected, the twostructures 1 and 2 are moved,step 44, up to a distance from the pier such that thesecond parts 12 and 22,step 45, can be coupled and then operated with robotic means,step 46. 
- Step 48 relating to the use of robotic means is carried out not only to increase the accuracy of the images, but also if the previous scans ofsteps 41 and 46 have detected certain processes to be carried out on the bridge. 
- In such case the area on which to intervene is identified and the robotic means are controlled to remedy the damage detected. 
- It is evident that the method just described, operating in automatic mode, allows constant and continuous monitoring of the bridge, able to detect any damage and see to its repair. 
- Figures 5a and 5b illustrate two views of thesecond parts 12 and 22 in coupled configuration, with the detail of the ends of each second part facing the centre of the bridge. 
- As anticipated in fact, thesecond part 12 is realized in a manner completely similar to thesecond part 22, except for the contact ends in coupling configuration, which identify theinterface 220. 
- According to the variant illustrated in the figures, such ends of the said second parts have complementary profiles, so that in coupled configuration of thesecond parts 12 and 22, the profiles of the corresponding ends are in contact by shape coupling. 
- In particular, the end of thesecond part 12 has aconvex profile 222, along a vertical section plane, in the direction of the central longitudinal axis of thebridge 10, while the other end has aconcave profile 221, along a vertical section plane, in the direction of the centre of thebridge 10. 
- Theprofiles 221 and 222 therefore have a wedge-shaped section, such that, in the transition from the decoupled configuration to the coupled configuration, the outer walls of theprofile 222 slide against the outer walls of theprofile 221, up to the interpenetration of the vertex of theprofile 222 into the seat formed by theconcave profile 221. 
- The variant just described makes it possible to realize a system which has a particularly slim structure and easy handling. 
- Several factors make it possible to obtain these benefits. 
- First, thesecond parts 12 and 22 can slide on thefirst parts 11 and 21, which are hung on theguides 13 and 23 and do not require additional components for the correct maintenance in position of the second or first parts. 
- Furthermore, according to the illustrated embodiment, the curved shape of thesecond parts 12 and 22 allows to limit the dimensions of the latter, also in open condition, when the second parts are more spaced apart from each other 
- Finally, the curved shape of thesecond parts 21 and 22 also has advantageous aspects with respect to the translation, especially in combination with the presence of complementary surfaces as described with regard tofigures 5a and 5b, as it facilitates the coupling of the twosecond parts 12 and 22. 
- The translation along a curve, and not along a straight line, of the two second parts, facilitates the sliding of thesurface 222 on thesurface 221, ensuring a solid coupling of the two second parts, even in the event of jolts in one or the other part, during the transition from the open condition to the closed condition.