EP3165877B1

Movatterモバイル変換

Info

Publication number: EP3165877B1
Application number: EP16195720.4A
Authority: EP
Inventors: Shalini Arora; Avik GHOSE; Shivani Johari; Vivek CHANDEL; Nasimuddin Ahmed
Original assignee: Tata Consultancy Services Ltd
Current assignee: Tata Consultancy Services Ltd
Priority date: 2015-11-04
Filing date: 2016-10-26
Publication date: 2020-03-25
Anticipated expiration: 2036-10-26
Also published as: EP3165877A1; US20170127242A1; US10397753B2

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS AND PRIORITY

The present application claims priority to Indian provisional specification titled "SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FUSING INERTIAL AND BLUETOOTH LOW ENERGY SENSOR DATA FOR LOCALIZATION" No. 4198/MUM/2015, filed in India on November 04, 2015.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The embodiments herein generally relate to localization systems, and, more particularly, to systems and methods for fusing inertial and Bluetooth low energy sensor data for localization.

BACKGROUND

Indoor localization using both radio frequency (RF) and inertial sensors on a mobile device is a common approach. Localization and mapping are performed to compute the most probable location using sensors and control values (if any). Current solutions have considered both the techniques and methods of fusing them. One of the existing solution is inertial navigation using Pedestrian Dead Reckoning (PDR) and particle filter (PF), which is a standard approach. However, it is well-known and evident from experimental results that PDR is susceptible to stride-length inaccuracies and magnetic noise. Another approach is using Received Signal Strength Indication (RSSI) from Radio Frequency (RF) sources on a mobile phone. Since signal strength decays with distance, it is possible to elucidate distance from the same. However, such measurements are corrupted by multipath and fading. Hence, none of the methods are individually correct but can provide location information with some granularity and error distribution.
A particular prior art (EP 2570772 A1) discloses a method for localization and mapping of pedestrian or robots using Wireless Access Points. Wireless Signal strength and/or time delay measurements from wireless access points are taken at regular or irregular time instances by a device carried by the pedestrian or robot in addition to odometry measurements.
Another particular prior art (US 2015/282111 A1) discloses systems, methods, and computer readable media related to employing particle filter methods to estimate the location of the mobile device. A respective location for the wireless data measurements may be determined based on the radio fingerprinting data and inertial data. A respective weight may be calculated for the respective location for each of the plurality of particles. A respective confidence level may be maintained for the respective location for each of the plurality of particles.
Another particular prior art (US 2014/011518 A1) discloses system, method, and computer program for dynamic radio map generation, which may be used for indoor positioning of one or more mobile devices based on received signal strength in some examples. In an aspect, a dynamic scheme may be used to learn the RSS radio map from only a small number of finger print samples.

SUMMARY

The following presents a simplified summary of some embodiments of the disclosure in order to provide a basic understanding of the embodiments. This summary is not an extensive overview of the embodiments. It is not intended to identify key/critical elements of the embodiments or to delineate the scope of the embodiments. Its sole purpose is to present some embodiments in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented below. In accordance with the present invention, a system and a hardware processor implemented method as set forth inclaims 1 and 7 is provided. Further embodiments of the invention are disclosed in dependent claims.
The step of assigning a weight to the trilaterated location may comprise assigning a higher weight when the distance between the user and each of the plurality of beacons in the identified grid is greater than a predefined distance from each beacon placed at each corner of the grid. The step of assigning a weight to the trilaterated location may comprise assigning a lower weight when the distance between the user and each of the plurality of beacons in the identified grid is less than a predefined distance from each beacon placed at each corner of the grid. The step of identifying the grid comprises identifying a row vector in the one or more grids based on a first initial co-ordinate of the location using a binary search technique, identifying a column vector corresponding to the row vector in the plurality of grids based on a second initial co-ordinate of the location using a linear binary search technique, and identifying the grid and each beacon identifier specific to each beacon from the plurality of beacons based on an intersection of the row vector and the column vector to obtain the set of beacon identifiers.
It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that any block diagram herein represent conceptual views of illustrative systems embodying the principles of the present subject matter. Similarly, it will be appreciated that any flow charts, flow diagrams, state transition diagrams, pseudo code, and the like represent various processes which may be substantially represented in computer readable medium and so executed by a computing device or processor, whether or not such computing device or processor is explicitly shown.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The embodiments herein will be better understood from the following detailed description with reference to the drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a graphical representation illustrating probability distribution of error with distance from beacons;
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a sensor data fusing system according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 3 is a grid layout of the floor plan having one or more grids according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 4 is a graphical representation illustrating Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) of error from inertial, BLE and the fused localization according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating a sensor data fusing method executed using the sensor data fusing system ofFIG. 2 according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 6A illustrates experimental results comprising weights for inertial sensor data and BLE sensor data, fusing the weights based on measurement errors for localization using the sensor data fusing system ofFIG. 2 according to one or more embodiments of the present disclosure;
FIG. 6B is a graphical representation illustrating inertial X co-ordinate, BLE (RF) X co-ordinate, and the fused X co-ordinate according to an embodiment of the present disclosure; and
FIG. 6C is a graphical representation illustrating inertial Y co-ordinate, BLE (RF) Y co-ordinate, and the fused Y co-ordinate according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

The embodiments herein and the various features and advantageous details thereof are explained more fully with reference to the non-limiting embodiments that are illustrated in the accompanying drawings and detailed in the following description. The examples used herein are intended merely to facilitate an understanding of ways in which the embodiments herein may be practiced and to further enable those of skill in the art to practice the embodiments herein. Accordingly, the examples should not be construed as limiting the scope of the embodiments herein.
Some embodiments of this disclosure, illustrating all its features, will now be discussed in detail. The disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary of the disclosure, which may be embodied in various forms.
Before setting forth the detailed explanation, it is noted that all of the discussion below, regardless of the particular implementation being described, is exemplary in nature, rather than limiting. For example, although selected aspects, features, or components of the implementations are depicted as being stored in memories, all or part of the systems and methods consistent with the apparel recognition and classification system and method may be stored on, distributed across, or read from other machine-readable media.
Referring now to the drawings, and more particularly toFIG. 1 through 6C, where similar reference characters denote corresponding features consistently throughout the figures, there are shown preferred embodiments and these embodiments are described in the context of the following exemplary system and/or method.
As mentioned above, indoor localization using both radio frequency (RF) and inertial sensors on a mobile device is a common approach. Localization and mapping are performed to compute the most probable location using sensors and control values (if any). Current solutions have considered both the techniques and methods of fusing them. One of the existing solution is inertial navigation using Pedestrian Dead Reckoning (PDR) and particle filter (PF), which is a standard approach. However, it is well-known and evident that PDR is susceptible to stride-length inaccuracies and magnetic noise. Another approach is using Received Signal Strength Indication (RSSI) from Radio Frequency (RF) sources on a mobile phone. Since signal strength decays with distance, it is possible to elucidate distance from the same. However, such measurements are corrupted by multipath and fading. Further, combining Bluetooth and inertial based localization rely on relative error models, proximity profiles and mostly fingerprinting based approaches because distance measurements from Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) provide Received Signal Strength Indication (RSSI) readings which are not stable. Hence, none of the methods are individually correct but can provide location information with some granularity and error distribution.FIG. 1 is a graphical representation illustrating probability distribution of error with distance from beacons. The BLE location error is spatial in nature, and hence the error is high when an object (e.g., the user) is less than 2 meters from beacon as can be seen inFIG. 1. The y-axis in the graphical representation ofFIG. 1 represents one or more units (e.g., 1 to 8), wherein each unit is 10 centimeters approximately, in one example embodiment.
The embodiments of the present disclosure proposes systems and methods that use the fact that BLE based localization systems can only give stable distance estimates for a range of certain meters. Utilizing this information, the embodiments of the present disclosure implements a fusing system wherein the entire indoor area (e.g., a floor plan) is divided into one or more grids (e.g., square grids of roughly 8 meters diagonal, or 4^∗sqrt(2) side-length). One or more beacons are placed at each crossing point of such grid. The terms "one or more grids" and "a plurality of grids" may be interchangeably used herein. Using inertial methods, a rough location of a user is derived to find out which grid the user belongs to. Following that a grid-based trilateration is carried out. Finally, the systems of the present disclosure implements spatial error model to fuse inertial and BLE based positions to arrive at a final more accurate location.FIG. 2, with reference toFIG. 1, is a block diagram of a sensordata fusing system 200 according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. The sensordata fusing system 200 comprises amemory 202, a hardware processor 104, and an input/output (I/O)interface 206. Thememory 202 further includes one or more modules 208 (or modules 208). Thememory 202, thehardware processor 204, the input/output (I/O)interface 206, and/or themodules 208 may be coupled by a system bus or a similar mechanism.
Thememory 202, may store instructions, any number of pieces of information, and data, used by a computer system, for example the sensordata fusing system 200 to implement the functions (or embodiments) of the present disclosure. Thememory 202 may include for example, volatile memory and/or non-volatile memory. Examples of volatile memory may include, but are not limited to volatile random access memory (RAM). The non-volatile memory may additionally or alternatively comprise an electrically erasable programmable read only memory (EEPROM), flash memory, hard drive, or the like. Some examples of the volatile memory includes, but are not limited to, random access memory, dynamic random access memory, static random access memory, and the like. Some example of the non-volatile memory includes, but are not limited to, hard disks, magnetic tapes, optical disks, programmable read only memory, erasable programmable read only memory, electrically erasable programmable read only memory, flash memory, and the like. Thememory 202 may be configured to store information, data, applications, instructions or the like for enabling the sensordata fusing system 200 to carry out various functions in accordance with various example embodiments.
Additionally or alternatively, thememory 202 may be configured to store instructions which when executed by thehardware processor 204 causes the sensordata fusing system 200 to behave in a manner as described in various embodiments (e.g., computing weights, determining the distance between user and beacons for localization). Thememory 202 stores information for example, information comprising sensory information, for example, sensor data obtained from one or more inertial sensors, one or more Bluetooth low energy (BLE) sensors, and combinations thereof.
Thehardware processor 204 may be implemented as one or more microprocessors, microcomputers, microcontrollers, digital signal processors, central processing units, state machines, logic circuitries, and/or any devices that manipulate signals based on operational instructions. Further, thehardware processor 204 may comprise a multi-core architecture. Among other capabilities, thehardware processor 204 is configured to fetch and execute computer-readable instructions or modules stored in thememory 202. Thehardware processor 204 may include circuitry implementing, among others, audio and logic functions associated with the communication. For example, thehardware processor 204 may include, but are not limited to, one or more digital signal processors (DSPs), one or more microprocessor, one or more special-purpose computer chips, one or more field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), one or more application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), one or more computer(s), various analog to digital converters, digital to analog converters, and/or other support circuits.
Thehardware processor 204 thus may also include the functionality to encode messages and/or data or information. Thehardware processor 204 may include, among other things, a clock, an arithmetic logic unit (ALU) and logic gates configured to support operation of thehardware processor 204. Further, thehardware processor 204 may include functionality to execute one or more software programs, which may be stored in thememory 202 or otherwise accessible to thehardware processor 204.
Thehardware processor 204 is configured by the instructions stored in thememory 202. Thehardware processor 204 when configured by the instructions to read and parse a floor plan to obtain a location of a user. The floor plan comprises one or more grids. Each grid comprises one or more beacons positioned at every corner of the grid. As discussed inFIG. 1, since the BLE location error is spatial in nature, and the error is high when an object (e.g., the user) is less than 2 meters from the beacon. Therefore, the floor plan (or the region of interest) is divided into grids for localization. For example, when the floor plan is divided into the one or more grids, each grid may be a square of 8 meters diagonal and the one or more beacons may be positioned at the corners of the square.
FIG. 3, with reference toFIGS. 1 through 2, is a grid layout of the floor plan having one or more grids according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. A grid from the one or more grids is identified based on the location of the user obtained from the floor plan. The location of the user is indicative of initial co-ordinates (e.g., a first initial co-ordinate 'x' and a second initial co-ordinate 'y'). The sensordata fusing system 200 executes one or more binary search techniques (stored in the memory 202) to identify a grid amongst the one or more grids. In one embodiment, the sensordata fusing system 200 execute a spatial binary search technique to provide the grid identifiers based on the x, y location of the user in O(2log(n)). A row vector in the grid is identified based on the first initial co-ordinate 'x' of the location using the binary search technique. Similarly, a column vector corresponding to the row vector in the grid is identified based on the second initial co-ordinate 'y' of the location using a linear binary search technique. Based on the intersection of the row vector and column vector, the grid is identified. Further each beacon identifier specific to each beacon from the one or more beacons positioned at every corner of the identified grid is identified based on the intersection of the row vector and the column vector. Once the one or more beacons are identified based on the intersections, a set of beacon identifiers pertaining to the identified beacons are obtained. More specifically, the sensordata fusing system 200 identifies the beacon identifiers using the below technique:
Begin:

Given a point (x, y)
Use x to find the 'row' vector in grid space using binary search technique.
For that 'row' use linear binary search to find the 'column' vector using y.
Return the Universally unique identifier (UUID) of the beacons at intersection of row and column
End.

Thehardware processor 204 further determines a distance between the user and the one or more identified beacons in the identified grid. Alternatively, this distance may be manually computed by one or more users (e.g., the user), and provided to thehardware processor 204 as an input. Thehardware processor 204 is further configured by the instructions to trilaterate (or triangulate) the location of the using the one or more beacon identifiers, wherein each beacon identifier is specific to a beacon from the one or more beacons positioned at each corner of the grid. Thehardware processor 204 further assigns a weight to the trilaterated location based on the distance between the user and the one or more beacons in the identified grid to obtain a first set of weights. According to the invention, the weight is assigned to the trilaterated location based on the distance between the user and each of the beacons positioned at corners in the grid.
Alternatively, the weight may be manually assigned by the user to the trilaterated location by computing the distance between the user and each beacon. For example, a first weight may be computed (or assigned) based on the distance between the user (a first co-ordinate) and a first beacon positioned at a first corner of the grid. Similarly, a second weight may be computed (or assigned) based on the distance between the user (a second co-ordinate) and a second beacon positioned at a second corner of the grid. Similarly, a third weight may be computed (or assigned) based on the distance between the user (a third co-ordinate) and a third beacon positioned at a third corner of the grid. Likewise, a fourth weight may be computed (or assigned) based on the distance between the user (a fourth co-ordinate) and a fourth beacon positioned at a fourth corner of the grid. A higher weight is assigned when the distance (IF inertial location) is greater than a predefined distance (e.g., 2 meters) from each beacon placed at each corner of the grid. Similarly, a lower weight is assigned when the distance (IF inertial location) is less than the predefined distance from each beacon placed at each corner of the grid. For example, the first weight may be computed (or assigned) may be higher weight when the distance between the user (the first co-ordinate) and the first beacon positioned at the first corner of the grid is greater than a predefined distance. Similarly, the first weight may be computed (or assigned) may be lower weight when the distance between the user (the first co-ordinate) and the first beacon positioned at the first corner of the grid is less than a predefined distance. The co-ordinates are represented by way of chequered circles inFIG. 3, and the beacons are represented by way of dotted circles inFIG. 3. The dotted circles representing the beacons are indicative of the identified grid. In other words, the fusion process to be implemented by the sensordata fusing system 200 uses spatial information to assign dynamic weights to BLE (also referred as RF) based location based on how far the user is from any of the beacons. Below is an illustrative criteria to assign the weight:
Begin:

     IF inertial_location > 2.0 meter from all beacons     then     weight ble ← high_weight_ble     else     weight ble ← low_weight_ble     endif      :End

The first weight, the second weight, the third weight and the fourth weight together form the first set of weights.

Thehardware processor 204 is further configured by the instructions to compute one or more weights using number of particles generated with respect to an inertial measurement obtained from an inertial sensor to obtain a second set of weights. Alternatively, the one or more weights may be computed by a user using information, for example, information includes number of particles generated with respect to the inertial measurement (e.g., inertial location) obtained from an inertial sensor. The inertial sensor is positioned (or located) in close proximity of the location of the user and the identified grid. For example, the inertial measurement (e.g., inertial location) may be obtained from one or more accelerometers executed in computing device (e.g., a mobile communication device) associated with the user (or other users who are in close proximity) of the location. The first set of weights and the second set of weights are indicative of x and y co-ordinates respectively. Once the first set of weights and the second set of weights are obtained, these weights are then fused to obtain an exact location of an object (e.g., the user) in the location/grid. More specifically, thehardware processor 204 is further configured by the instructions to fuse the first set of weights and the second set of weights to obtain a first coordinate (e.g., a first actual co-ordinate) and a second co-ordinate (e.g., a second actual co-ordinate) of a specific position of the user in the location. The first initial co-ordinate 'x' and the second initial co-ordinate 'y' are different from the first actual co-ordinate and the second actual co-ordinate which provide an exact position of the user in the location. Alternatively, one or more co-ordinates (e.g., x and y inertial co-ordinates, and x and y RF (BLE) co-ordinates) pertaining to weights assigned/computed (e.g., the first set of weight and the second set of weights) are fused together to obtain the first actual co-ordinate and the second actual co-ordinate which provide the exact position of the user in the identified grid of the location. Moreover, the first actual co-ordinate and the second actual co-ordinate which provide the exact position of the user in the location in the identified grid are obtained based on the prioritization of weights. For example, x and y co-ordinates with higher weights may be prioritized over lower weights for fusion.

Alternatively, the sensordata fusing system 200 may execute themodules 208 comprising a floor plan parsing module that when executed by thehardware processor 204 reads (and/or analyses) and parses the floor plan to obtain the location of the user. The modules further includes a grid identification module that identifies a grid from the one or more grids based on the location of the user to obtain an identified grid as shown inFIG. 3. Similarly, themodules 208 further comprises a weight calculator that assigns/computes the weights (e.g., the first set of weights) to the trilaterated location based on the distance between the user and from all beacons (e.g., each of the beacons positioned at corners) in the grid. Similarly, the weight calculator computes the second set of weights using number of particles generated with respect to the inertial measurement obtained from the inertial sensor. Themodules 208 further comprises a fusing module that fuses the first set of weights and the second set of weights to obtain (or derive/determine) the first actual coordinate and the second actual co-ordinate that are indicative of a specific position of the user in the location. The modules for example, the floor plan parsing module, a grid locator (or a grid identification module), the weight calculator, and the fusing module are implemented as at least one of a logically self-contained part of a software program, a self-contained hardware component, and/or, a self-contained hardware component, with a logically self-contained part of a software program embedded into each of the hardware component that when executed perform the above method described herein, in one embodiment.

Since, inertial sensor data is based on tracking, and BLE sensor data is based on positioning, fusing is performed based on one or more criteria. The one or more criteria include: fusing to be performed (i) each time user comes to rest position, and (ii) when a noisy inertial window is determined (or obtained) due to ambient noise such as "above a threshold magnetic field", or "usage of communication device (noisy window caused due to improper/incorrect orientation of the communication device)" (e.g., a mobile communication device). The mobile communication device is used within the indoor facility where the one or more inertial sensors and the one or more BLE sensors are positioned to obtain inertial sensor data and BLE sensor data. If neither of the criteria occur, then the sensordata fusing system 200 fuses for every predetermined time period (e.g., for every 30 seconds), based on a timer expiry.

FIG. 4, with reference toFIGS. 1 through 3, is a graphical representation illustrating Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) of error from inertial, BLE and the fused localization according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.

FIG. 5, with reference toFIGS. 1 through 4, is a flow diagram illustrating a sensor data fusing method executed using the sensordata fusing system 200 ofFIG. 2 according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. The sensor data fusing method includes reading and parsing (502), a floor plan to obtain a location of a user, wherein the floor plan includes a plurality of grids; identifying (504), a grid from the plurality of grids using the location of the user, wherein the grid includes a plurality of beacons; determining (506), a distance between the user and the plurality of beacons; trilaterating (508), the location of the user using a plurality of beacon identifiers, each beacon identifier specific to a beacon from the plurality of beacons; assigning (510), a weight to the trilaterated location based on the distance between the user and the plurality of beacons in the grid to obtain a first set of weights; computing (512), one or more weights using number of particles generated with respect to an inertial measurement obtained from an inertial sensor to obtain a second set of weights; and fusing (514), the first set of weights and the second set of weights to obtain a first coordinate and a second co-ordinate of a specific position of the user in the location. Assigning a weight to the trilaterated location includes assigning a higher weight when the distance is greater than a predefined distance from each beacon placed at each corner of the grid. Assigning a weight to the trilaterated location includes assigning a lower weight when the distance is less than a predefined distance from each beacon placed at each corner of the grid. The step of identifying the grid includes identifying a row vector in the one or more grids based on a first initial co-ordinate of the location using a binary search technique. The step of identifying the grid further includes identifying a column vector corresponding to the row vector in the plurality of grids based on a second initial co-ordinate of the location using a linear binary search technique. The step of identifying the grid further includes identifying the grid and each beacon identifier specific to each beacon from the plurality of beacons based on an intersection of the row vector and the column vector to obtain the set of beacon identifiers.

FIG. 6A, with reference toFIGS. 1 through 5, illustrates experimental results comprising weights for inertial sensor data and BLE (RF) sensor data, fusing the weights based on measurement errors for localization using the sensordata fusing system 200 ofFIG. 2 according to one or more embodiments of the present disclosure. The ground truth X and Y co-ordinates are the first and second initial co-ordinates (also referred as true X and Y co-ordinates). The inertial X and Y co-ordinates are the sensor data (or inertial measurements) obtained from an accelerometer (using a mobile communication device associated with the user). In other words, the inertial X and Y co-ordinates are the X and Y co-ordinates from the accelerometer data. Similarly, the BLE (RF) X and Y co-ordinates are the X and Y co-ordinates indicating the distance between the user and each of the beacon positioned at every corner of the identified grid. The BLE (RF) X and Y co-ordinates are the co-ordinates obtained based on the distance between the user and the beacons placed at every corner of the identified grid. The fused X and Y co-ordinates are the actual X and Y co-ordinates obtained from the weights (e.g., the first set of weights and the second set of weights) assigned (or computed) to the inertial X and Y co-ordinates and the BLE (RF) X and Y co-ordinates. The fused X and Y co-ordinates are the actual X and Y co-ordinates that specify an exact position of the user in the location (or the identified grid).

FIG. 6B, with reference toFIGS. 1 through 6A, is a graphical representation illustrating inertial X co-ordinate, BLE (RF) X co-ordinate, and the fused X co-ordinate according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.FIG. 6C, with reference toFIGS. 1 through 6B, is a graphical representation illustrating inertial Y co-ordinate, BLE (RF) Y co-ordinate, and the fused Y co-ordinate according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. The y-axis in the graphical representations ofFIG. 6B and 6C represent one or more units (e.g., 1 to 8), wherein each unit is 10 centimeters approximately, in one example embodiment.

The written description describes the subject matter herein to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the embodiments. The scope of the subject matter embodiments is defined by the claims and may include other modifications that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other modifications are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have similar elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims or if they include equivalent elements with insubstantial differences from the literal language of the claims.

The embodiments of the present disclosure provide sensor data fusing systems and methods that account the spatial error or spatial limitation of BLE based localization. Unlike conventional systems and methods which fail to consider spatial error or spatial limitation of BLE based localization, the sensordata fusing system 200 determines distance between the user and the beacons placed at corners of the identified grid, and account distance limitation factor of BLE based localization, and the spatial nature of localization error from BLE for fusing weights specific to inertial measurements and BLE sensors to obtain precise (or accurate) co-ordinates that are indicative of the position of the user in the location, and thereby localizing the user accurately beyond 2 meters (e.g., 8 meters) using BLE sensor data.

The embodiments of the present disclosure further enable the sensor data fusing system 100 to dynamically control the fusion weights using the distance from the beacons, and accordingly update in real-time the fusion weights without any user intervention. The embodiments of the present disclosure further enable trilateration being done at server level to obtain the spatial error from BLE beacons and further enables to map it properly as the map for the area is stored at server level. The embodiments of the present disclosure may be implemented in real time indoor tracking system, which can be an organization for finding common utilities like parking, conference rooms, and the like. The embodiments of the present disclosure further enable the sensor data fusing system 100 to be implemented in real time indoor path assistance solution such as in warehouses to guide Goods downloaded from the transportation vehicles to be moved to one or more shelves. The sensor data fusing system 100 may also be further used for providing real time location information of people in an emergency evacuation scenario, which can be helpful to evacuation marshals. The sensor data fusing system 100 may be implemented in Indoor Navigation systems for events and guiding users to venue of the sessions within the events.

It is, however to be understood that the scope of the protection is extended to such a program and in addition to a computer-readable means having a message therein; such computer-readable storage means contain program-code means for implementation of one or more steps of the method, when the program runs on a server or mobile device or any suitable programmable device. The hardware device can be any kind of device which can be programmed including e.g. any kind of computer like a server or a personal computer, or the like, or any combination thereof. The device may also include means which could be e.g. hardware means like e.g. an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field-programmable gate array (FPGA), or a combination of hardware and software means, e.g. an ASIC and an FPGA, or at least one microprocessor and at least one memory with software modules located therein. Thus, the means can include both hardware means and software means. The method embodiments described herein could be implemented in hardware and software. The device may also include software means. Alternatively, the embodiments may be implemented on different hardware devices, e.g. using a plurality of CPUs.

The embodiments herein can comprise hardware and software elements. The embodiments that are implemented in software include but are not limited to, firmware, resident software, microcode, etc. The functions performed by various modules described herein may be implemented in other modules or combinations of other modules. For the purposes of this description, a computer-usable or computer readable medium can be any apparatus that can comprise, store, communicate, propagate, or transport the program for use by or in connection with the instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.

The medium can be an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system (or apparatus or device) or a propagation medium. Examples of a computer-readable medium include a semiconductor or solid state memory, magnetic tape, a removable computer diskette, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), a rigid magnetic disk and an optical disk. Current examples of optical disks include compact disk-read only memory (CD-ROM), compact disk-read/write (CD-R/W) and DVD.

A data processing system suitable for storing and/or executing program code will include at least one processor coupled directly or indirectly to memory elements through a system bus. The memory elements can include local memory employed during actual execution of the program code, bulk storage, and cache memories which provide temporary storage of at least some program code in order to reduce the number of times code must be retrieved from bulk storage during execution.

Input/output (I/O) devices (including but not limited to keyboards, displays, pointing devices, etc.) can be coupled to the system either directly or through intervening I/O controllers. Network adapters may also be coupled to the system to enable the data processing system to become coupled to other data processing systems or remote printers or storage devices through intervening private or public networks. Modems, cable modem and Ethernet cards are just a few of the currently available types of network adapters.

A representative hardware environment for practicing the embodiments may include a hardware configuration of an information handling/computer system in accordance with the embodiments herein. The system herein comprises at least one processor or central processing unit (CPU). The CPUs are interconnected via system bus to various devices such as a random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), and an input/output (I/O) adapter. The I/O adapter can connect to peripheral devices, such as disk units and tape drives, or other program storage devices that are readable by the system. The system can read the inventive instructions on the program storage devices and follow these instructions to execute the methodology of the embodiments herein.

The system further includes a user interface adapter that connects a keyboard, mouse, speaker, microphone, and/or other user interface devices such as a touch screen device (not shown) to the bus to gather user input. Additionally, a communication adapter connects the bus to a data processing network, and a display adapter connects the bus to a display device which may be embodied as an output device such as a monitor, printer, or transmitter, for example.

The preceding description has been presented with reference to various embodiments. Persons having ordinary skill in the art and technology to which this application pertains will appreciate that alterations and changes in the described structures and methods of operation can be practiced within the limits defined by the claims.

Claims

A system comprising:
a memory (202) storing instructions;
a processor (204) communicatively coupled to said memory, wherein said processor is configured by said instructions to:
read and parse a floor plan, and use an inertial measurement to obtain an inertial location of a user, wherein said floor plan comprises a plurality of grids;
identify a grid from said plurality of grids using said inertial location of said user,
wherein said grid comprises a plurality of beacons, wherein one or more beacons are placed at each crossing point of the grid;
determine a distance between said inertial location of said user and each of said plurality of beacons in said identified grid, to obtain a plurality of distances;
trilaterate a location of said user using a plurality of beacon identifiers, each beacon identifier of said plurality of beacon identifiers being specific to a beacon from said plurality of beacons;
obtain a first set of weights for the trilaterated location based on the distances between said inertial location of said user and each of the plurality of beacons in said identified grid, compute one or more weights with respect to an inertial measurement obtained from an inertial sensor to obtain a second set of weights, wherein the inertial sensor is positioned in close proximity of the location of the user and the identified grid; and
fuse, based on one or more criteria, said first set of weights and said second set of weights to obtain a first actual coordinate and a second actual co-ordinate, wherein the_first actual coordinate and the second actual coordinate are indicative of a specific position of said user in said location, wherein, the one or more criteria includes fusing to be performed:
(i) each time the user comes to a rest position and (ii) when a noisy inertial window is determined due to at least one of ambient noise such as noise being above a threshold magnetic field and improper orientation of the inertial sensors,
wherein if neither of the criteria occur, the fusing is performed for every predetermined time period, based on a timer expiry.
The system of claim 1, wherein said weight based on the distance between the inertial location of said user and a beacon is a higher weight when said distances between said user and each of said plurality of beacons in said grid are greater than a predefined distance from each beacon placed at each corner of said grid.
The system of claim 1, wherein said weight based on the distance between the inertial location of said user and a beacon is a lower weight when said distances between said user and each of said plurality of beacons in said grid are less than a predefined distance from each beacon placed at each corner of said grid.
The system of claim 1, wherein a row vector in said plurality of grids is identified based on a first initial co-ordinate of said location using a binary search technique.
The system of claim 4, wherein a column vector corresponding to said row vector in said plurality of grids is identified based on a second initial co-ordinate of said location using a linear binary search technique.
The system of claim 5, wherein said grid and each beacon identifier specific to each beacon from said plurality of beacons are identified based on an intersection of said row vector and said column vector to obtain said set of beacon identifiers.
A hardware processor implemented method comprising:
reading and parsing a floor plan, and using an inertial measurement to obtain an inertial location of a user, wherein said floor plan comprises a plurality of grids;
identifying a grid from said plurality of grids using said inertial location of said user, wherein said grid comprises a plurality of beacons, wherein one or more beacons are placed at each crossing point of the grid;
determining a distance between said inertial location of said user and each of said plurality of beacons in said identified grid, to obtain a plurality of distances;
trilaterating a location of said user using a plurality of beacon identifiers, each beacon identifier of said plurality of beacon identifiers being specific to a beacon from said plurality of beacons;
obtaining a first set of weights for the trilaterated location based on the distance between said inertial location of said user and each of the plurality of beacons in said identified grid;
computing one or more weights with respect to an inertial measurement obtained from an inertial sensor to obtain a second set of weights, wherein the inertial sensor is positioned in close proximity of the location of the user and the identified grid; and
fusing, based on one or more criteria, said first set of weights and said second set of weights to obtain a first actual coordinate and a second actual co-ordinate, wherein the first actual coordinate and the second actual coordinate are indicative of a specific position of said user in said location, wherein, the one or more criteria includes fusing to be performed (i) each time the user comes to a rest position, and (ii) when a noisy inertial window is determined due to ambient noise such as noise being above a threshold magnetic field and improper orientation of the inertial sensor,
wherein if neither of the criteria occur, the fusing is performed for every predetermined time period, based on a timer expiry.
The method of claim 7, wherein assigning a weight based on the distance between the inertial location of said user and a beacon comprises assigning a weight when said distances between said user and each of said plurality of beacons in said grid are greater than a predefined distance from each beacon placed at each corner of said grid.
The method of claim 7, wherein assigning a weight based on the distance between the inertial location of said user and a beacon comprises assigning a weight when said distances between said user and each of said plurality of beacons in said grid are less than a predefined distance from each beacon placed at each corner of said grid.
The method of claim 7, wherein identifying said grid comprises identifying a row vector in said one or more grids based on a first initial co-ordinate of said location using a binary search technique.
The method of claim 10, wherein identifying said grid comprises identifying a column vector corresponding to said row vector in said plurality of grids based on a second initial co-ordinate of said location using a linear binary search technique.
The method of claim 11, wherein identifying said grid comprises identifying said grid and each beacon identifier specific to each beacon from said plurality of beacons based on an intersection of said row vector and said column vector to obtain said set of beacon identifiers.