Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


EP2942767B1 - Apparatus and method for warning aircraft - Google Patents

Apparatus and method for warning aircraft
Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2942767B1
EP2942767B1EP14001651.0AEP14001651AEP2942767B1EP 2942767 B1EP2942767 B1EP 2942767B1EP 14001651 AEP14001651 AEP 14001651AEP 2942767 B1EP2942767 B1EP 2942767B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
aircraft
obstacle
information
warning
trajectory
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP14001651.0A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2942767A1 (en
Inventor
Thomas Schanne
Tobias Schafhitzel
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hensoldt Sensors GmbH
Original Assignee
Hensoldt Sensors GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hensoldt Sensors GmbHfiledCriticalHensoldt Sensors GmbH
Priority to EP14001651.0ApriorityCriticalpatent/EP2942767B1/en
Publication of EP2942767A1publicationCriticalpatent/EP2942767A1/en
Application grantedgrantedCritical
Publication of EP2942767B1publicationCriticalpatent/EP2942767B1/en
Activelegal-statusCriticalCurrent
Anticipated expirationlegal-statusCritical

Links

Images

Classifications

Definitions

Landscapes

Description

    Apparatus and Method for Warning Aircraft
  • The invention relates generally to apparatus for, and methods of, warning aircraft of obstacles.
  • It is known that tall objects having fixed positions on the earth's surface, such as wind turbines, present a serious danger to aircraft. It is known to provide an aircraft with a warning system which includes a database of the positions and heights of such objects so that a pilot may avoid them.
  • US2012/0215436 A1 shows a device and method based on radar sensors for monitor-ing obstacles in the close environment of an aircraft moving at low speed and at low altitude, providing alerts based on the criticalitv to the aircrew.
  • US2013/096814 A1shows an on ground collision preventive device for a vehicle using multiple information sources including a database containing obstacle data.
  • WO03071371A1 discloses a method and apparatus for indicating aircraft height relative to an obstruction in a terrain awareness warning system.
  • A similar problem arises with movable objects on the earth's surface. In particular tall ships can be a danger to aircraft, particularly in regions where there is significant offshore industry, such as oil and gas industry. Ships involved in industrial activity can have height dimensions which present danger to aircraft, due to the presence of cranes and other tall structures (such as parts of oil rigs) carried on such ships. Collisions between ships can be avoided, or least reduced, by use of commercial Automatic Identification Systems (AISs). A ship carrying an AIS transponder emits a signal on a dedicated VHF channel, the signal containing information corresponding to the ship's position, speed, direction and identity. The AIS transponder also receives such signals from other ships. Trajectories of ships can therefore be compared and suitable action taken to avoid collisions. It is also known for aircraft to receive AIS information from ships in order to prevent collisions between ships and aircraft. However, because commercial AIS signals contain no information about the height of a ship, comparing the trajectories of aircraft with those of ships using AIS information leads to a high false alarm rate because many ships will not have a height dimension that results in a danger to aircraft. It is also possible for very tall and movable objects on land to pose a danger to aircraft; currently no system exists to warn aircraft of such objects.
  • A first aspect of the present invention provides apparatus to be carried on-board of an aircraft for warning the aircraft of an obstacle on the earth's surface, the apparatus comprising a warning system arranged to:
    1. (i) receive first information corresponding to the obstacle's identity and obstacle's position and second information corresponding to the aircraft's horizontal and vertical position as a function of time; and
    2. (ii) calculate an aircraft trajectory for the aircraft using the second information;
    3. (iii) the apparatus further comprises storage means storing a database of obstacle identities and corresponding height data;
    4. (iv) the warning system is arranged to retrieve a height dimension of the obstacle from the database using the obstacle's identity as derived from the first information, and
    5. (v) the warning system is arranged to generate a warning signal if the obstacle lies on or within a pre-determined vicinity the aircraft's horizontal trajectory and the difference between the height dimension of the obstacle and the altitude of the aircraft at the obstacle position of the aircraft trajectory is less than a pre-determined value,
  • The invention provides the advantage that an obstacle may be assessed as a potential danger to aircraft using only information corresponding to the obstacle's position and identity; reception of information corresponding to the obstacle's height is not necessary since the obstacle's height is obtained from a database using the obstacle's identity. Since a warning signal is generated only if the aircraft's altitude is comparable to the obstacle's height, and not simply if the obstacle lies on the aircraft horizontal trajectory, the incidence of false alarms is reduced compared to prior art methods which only utilise the obstacle's position in order to decide whether the obstacle presents a danger to aircraft.
  • According to the invention, the warning system is arranged to receive third information corresponding to the obstacle's speed and direction and to use the first and third information and the aircraft' horizontal trajectory to calculate whether the aircraft and the obstacle will coincide in horizontal position at a coincidence point, and to generate a warning signal if the aircraft and obstacle are calculated so to coincide and the difference between the height dimension of the obstacle and the altitude of the aircraft at the coincidence point is less than a pre-determined value. This provides for additional assessment of the obstacle as a danger to aircraft by assessing whether it will coincide with the aircraft in horizontal position.
  • The warning system is arranged to derive the first and third information, from an Automatic Identification System (AIS) signal. AISs are commercially available and are used on ships to provide position, direction, speed and identity information primarily to other ships, but also to aircraft. In accordance with the invention, a commercial AIS signal may be used without modification to warn aircraft of ships that may present danger due to their heights, without a high rate of false alarms, even though an AIS signal does not include any information about the height of ship.
  • According to the invention, the apparatus comprises a position receiver arranged to receive AIS signals and to pass the AIS signals to the warning system.
  • Conveniently, the storage means is comprised within the warning system.
  • A second aspect of the invention provides a method of warning an aircraft of an obstacle on the earth's surface, the method performed on-board of the aircraft comprising the steps of:
    1. (i) receiving first information corresponding to the obstacle's identity and obstacle's position and second information corresponding to the aircraft's horizontal and vertical position as a function of time; and
    2. (ii) calculating an aircraft trajectory for the aircraft using the second information;
    3. (iii) retrieving a height dimension of the obstacle from a database of obstacle identities and corresponding height data using the obstacle's identity as derived from the first information; and
    4. (iv) generating a warning signal if the obstacle lies on or within a pre-determined vicinity of the aircraft's horizontal trajectory and the difference between the height dimension of the obstacle and the altitude of the aircraft at the obstacle position of the aircraft trajectory is less than a pre-determined value.
  • According to the invention, the method comprises the steps of receiving third information corresponding to the obstacle's speed and direction, and using the first and third information and the aircraft's horizontal trajectory to calculate whether the aircraft and the obstacle will coincide at a horizontal position at a coincidence point, and generating a warning signal if the aircraft and obstacle are calculated so to coincide at the coincidence point and the difference between the height dimension of the obstacle and the altitude of the aircraft at the coincidence point is less than a pre-determined value.
  • According to the invention, the first and third information, are derived from an AIS signal.
  • Embodiments of the invention are described below by way of example only and with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
  • Figure 1
    shows a block diagram of an apparatus of the invention;
    Figure 2
    illustrates generation of a warning signal based on the position and height of a ship; and
    Figures 3 & 4
    illustrate generation of a warning signal based on the trajectory and height of a ship.
  • Figure 1 shows an apparatus of the invention indicated generally by 10 and comprising aship position receiver 12, storage means 14 storing a database of ship identities and corresponding height data, and awarning system 16. Thewarning system 16 is a standard commercial collision warning system, for example a Helicopter Terrain Avoidance and Warning System (HTAWS). InFigure 1, aship 20 comprises a commercial Automatic Identification System (AIS) transponder (not shown), which emits anAIS signal 22 on a dedicated channel such as a VHF channel. TheAIS signal 22 comprises information regarding the position, speed, direction and identity of theship 22. Theapparatus 10 is carried on an aircraft (not shown). Theship position receiver 12 receives theAIS signal 22 and passes a corresponding signal to thewarning system 10. Thewarning system 16 also receives information corresponding to the altitude of the aircraft, and its horizontal position (e.g. latitude and longitude) as a function of time.
  • Referring toFigure 2, anaircraft 50 fitted with theapparatus 10 ofFigure 1 and having ahorizontal trajectory 52 receives a respective AIS signal from each ofships 54, 56. Theship 54 does not lie on thehorizontal trajectory 52 and therefore no warning signal is generated in respect of theships 54. However theship 56 does lie on thehorizontal trajectory 52. In this case the warning system uses the identity of theship 56 obtained from the AIS signal to look up the height dimension of theship 56 using the database held in the storage means 14. The height dimension of theship 56 is then compared to the altitude of theaircraft 50 and a warning is generated if the altitude of theaircraft 50 does not exceed the height dimension of theship 56 by more than a pre-determined value.
  • Figures 3 and 4 illustrate how a warning may be generated based on the trajectory of a ship in addition to its height. Anaircraft 60 fitted with theapparatus 10 has ahorizontal trajectory 62 and receives respective AIS signals fromships 64, 66. In this case thewarning system 16 of the apparatus is arranged to assess the trajectories of theships 64, 66 using the respective AIS signal of each ship, and to compare the trajectories to thehorizontal trajectory 62 of theaircraft 60. Thewarning system 10 is arranged to establish whether thehorizontal trajectory 62 of theaircraft 60 intersects the trajectory of eithership 64, 66, and whether theaircraft 60 will intercept eithership 64, 66 based on their speeds and the speed of theaircraft 60.
  • The trajectory and speed ofship 64 are such that theship 64 andaircraft 60 will coincide. Thewarning system 16 of theapparatus 10 therefore generates a warning signal provided the altitude of theaircraft 62 does not exceed the height of theship 64 by more than a pre-determined value. In such a case theaircraft 60 may make an avoidingmanoeuvre 63 to avoid collision with theship 64.
  • Although the trajectory of theship 66 intersects the aircrafthorizontal trajectory 62, theaircraft 60 andship 66 will not coincide at a particular horizontal position (e.g. a particular latitude and longitude) and therefore no warning signal is generated in relation to theship 66.

Claims (3)

  1. Apparatus (10), to be carried on-board of an aircraft, for warning the aircraft of an obstacle on the earth's surface, the apparatus comprising a warning system (16) arranged to:
    (i) receive first information corresponding to the obstacle's position and second information corresponding to the aircraft's horizontal and vertical position as a function of time; and
    (ii) calculate an aircraft trajectory for the aircraft using the second information;
    (iii) the apparatus further comprises storage means (14) storing a database;
    (iv) generate a warning signal if the obstacle lies on or within a pre-determined vicinity the aircraft's horizontal trajectory and the difference between the height dimension of the obstacle and the altitude of the aircraft at the obstacle position of the aircraft trajectory is less than a pre-determined value;
    characterised in that
    (v) the apparatus comprises a position receiver (12) arranged to receive the first information and pass it to the warning system, whereas the first information additionally comprises the obstacle's identity,
    (vi) whereas the warning system is arranged to derive the first information from an Automatic Identification System (AIS) signal,
    (vii) the database contains the obstacle identities and corresponding height data; and
    (viii) the warning system is arranged to retrieve a height dimension of the obstacle from the database using the obstacle's identity as derived from the first information, wherein the warning system is arranged to receive third information derived from the Automatic Identification System signal (AIS) corresponding to the obstacle's speed and direction and wherein the warning system is arranged to use the first and third information and the aircraft's horizontal trajectory to calculate whether the aircraft and the obstacle will coincide in horizontal position at a coincidence point, and to generate a warning signal only if the aircraft and obstacle are calculated so to coincide and the difference between the height dimension of the obstacle and the altitude of the aircraft at the coincidence point is less than a pre-determined value.
  2. A system according to any preceding claim wherein the storage means is comprised within the warning system.
  3. A method of warning an aircraft of an obstacle on the earth's surface, the method performed on-board of the aircraft comprising the steps of:
    (i) receiving first information corresponding to the obstacle's position and second information corresponding to the aircraft's horizontal and vertical position as a function of time; and
    (ii) calculating an aircraft trajectory for the aircraft using the second information;
    (iii) generating a warning signal on-board of an aircraft if the obstacle lies on or with in a pre-determined vicinity of the aircraft's horizontal trajectory and the difference between the height dimension of the obstacle and the altitude of the aircraft at the obstacle position of the aircraft trajectory is less than a pre-determined value;
    characterised in that the method further comprises the steps of:
    (iv) receiving first information corresponding to the obstacle's identity by a position receiver, the first information being derived from an Automatic Identification System (AIS) signal;
    (v) retrieving a height dimension of the obstacle from a database of obstacle identities and corresponding height data using the obstacle's identity as derived from the first information, further comprising the steps of receiving third information derived from the Automatic Identification System (AIS) signal corresponding to the obstacle's speed and direction, and using the first and third information and the aircraft's horizontal trajectory to calculate whether the aircraft and the obstacle will coincide in horizontal position at a coincidence point, and generating a warning signal only if the aircraft and obstacle are calculated so to coincide at the coincidence point and the difference between the height dimension of the obstacle and the altitude of the aircraft at the coincidence point is less than a pre-determined value.
EP14001651.0A2014-05-102014-05-10Apparatus and method for warning aircraftActiveEP2942767B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application NumberPriority DateFiling DateTitle
EP14001651.0AEP2942767B1 (en)2014-05-102014-05-10Apparatus and method for warning aircraft

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application NumberPriority DateFiling DateTitle
EP14001651.0AEP2942767B1 (en)2014-05-102014-05-10Apparatus and method for warning aircraft

Publications (2)

Publication NumberPublication Date
EP2942767A1 EP2942767A1 (en)2015-11-11
EP2942767B1true EP2942767B1 (en)2022-06-22

Family

ID=50732737

Family Applications (1)

Application NumberTitlePriority DateFiling Date
EP14001651.0AActiveEP2942767B1 (en)2014-05-102014-05-10Apparatus and method for warning aircraft

Country Status (1)

CountryLink
EP (1)EP2942767B1 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
CN110299029A (en)*2019-06-252019-10-01中山市聚云软件科技有限公司Ship feature detection system and method and bridge superelevation early warning system and method
CN110500992B (en)*2019-08-062021-06-08安徽省交通规划设计研究总院股份有限公司Bridge navigation clearance scale real-time monitoring and early warning system and method
CN114894103B (en)*2022-03-302023-10-10湖北国际物流机场有限公司Ultrahigh ship detection system based on laser technology and detection method thereof

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
WO2003071371A1 (en)*2001-10-112003-08-28Sandel Avionics, Inc.Method and apparatus for predictive altitude display
JP3763004B1 (en)*2005-08-032006-04-05国土交通省国土技術政策総合研究所長 Ship monitoring system near aircraft entry and exit, and ship monitoring method near aircraft entry and exit
KR101004126B1 (en)*2010-09-272010-12-27(주)에디넷 3D Port Control System

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
FR2917222B1 (en)*2007-06-052009-10-30Thales Sa COLLISION PREVENTION DEVICE AND METHOD FOR A GROUND VEHICLE
WO2009090185A2 (en)*2008-01-182009-07-23Heinz WipfMethod and system for preventing a movable object from entering a protected section
FR2932279B1 (en)*2008-06-102011-08-19Thales Sa DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MONITORING OBSTRUCTIONS IN THE ENVIRONMENT CLOSE TO AN AIRCRAFT.
EP2136222B1 (en)*2008-06-182013-01-16Saab AbValidity check of vehicle position information
EP2648174B1 (en)*2012-03-192018-05-02Hughey & Phillips, LLCLighting and collision alerting system
DE102012110384B4 (en)*2012-10-302019-11-28Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. AIS monitoring system

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
WO2003071371A1 (en)*2001-10-112003-08-28Sandel Avionics, Inc.Method and apparatus for predictive altitude display
JP3763004B1 (en)*2005-08-032006-04-05国土交通省国土技術政策総合研究所長 Ship monitoring system near aircraft entry and exit, and ship monitoring method near aircraft entry and exit
KR101004126B1 (en)*2010-09-272010-12-27(주)에디넷 3D Port Control System

Also Published As

Publication numberPublication date
EP2942767A1 (en)2015-11-11

Similar Documents

PublicationPublication DateTitle
Wang et al.Collision risk management for non-cooperative UAS traffic in airport-restricted airspace with alert zones based on probabilistic conflict map
US6208284B1 (en)Radar augmented TCAS
US10854097B2 (en)Anti-collision device and related avionic protection system, anti-collision method and computer program
US8249799B2 (en)Method and device for aiding navigation for an aircraft in relation to obstacles
US8509965B2 (en)Integrated collision avoidance system for air vehicle
EP3879310B1 (en)Gnss spoofing detection using terrain mapping
EP2235711B1 (en)Multi-sensor system and method for collision avoidance
US7016772B2 (en)Vehicle information display apparatus
US7656343B1 (en)System and method for providing enhanced weather hazard alerting for aircraft
US20200090529A1 (en)Boolean Mathematics Approach to Air Traffic Management
CN103699713A (en)Collision detection method for airplane formation and application of method
CN109903592B (en)High-precision aircraft automatic near-ground collision avoidance system terrain scanning method based on error theory
US10494108B1 (en)System and method for providing icing condition warnings
EP2113789B1 (en)Radar target processing reduction systems and methods using cooperative surveillance sources
CN111276011B (en) A safety assessment and warning method and system for multi-runway flight procedure operation
CN103714717A (en)Method for dynamically tracing ships and identifying behavior patterns of ships based SAR data
EP2942767B1 (en)Apparatus and method for warning aircraft
CA2074602A1 (en)Collision warning system
Orefice et al.Sense and avoid: Systems and methods
US9783318B2 (en)Method and system for triggering an emergency measure
CN103942979B (en)The method for early warning of detection target and device
WO2025040961A1 (en)Smart surveillance data processing systems for safe uncrewed aircraft and surface vessel operation beyond visual line of sight
Glenn Wright et al.Arctic environment preservation through grounding avoidance
KR102068287B1 (en)System for detecting prirate ship using broadband radar and method thereof
KR20140007614A (en)Method and apparatus for establishing minimum required region for collision prevention of object

Legal Events

DateCodeTitleDescription
PUAIPublic reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text:ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AKDesignated contracting states

Kind code of ref document:A1

Designated state(s):AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AXRequest for extension of the european patent

Extension state:BA ME

17PRequest for examination filed

Effective date:20160112

RBVDesignated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s):AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

RAP1Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name:AIRBUS DS ELECTRONICS AND BORDER SECURITY GMBH

RAP1Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name:HENSOLDT SENSORS GMBH

RAP1Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name:HENSOLDT SENSORS GMBH

STAAInformation on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text:STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17QFirst examination report despatched

Effective date:20191016

GRAPDespatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text:ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAAInformation on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text:STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTGIntention to grant announced

Effective date:20220316

GRASGrant fee paid

Free format text:ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA(expected) grant

Free format text:ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAAInformation on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text:STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AKDesignated contracting states

Kind code of ref document:B1

Designated state(s):AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REGReference to a national code

Ref country code:GB

Ref legal event code:FG4D

REGReference to a national code

Ref country code:CH

Ref legal event code:EP

REGReference to a national code

Ref country code:DE

Ref legal event code:R096

Ref document number:602014084070

Country of ref document:DE

REGReference to a national code

Ref country code:AT

Ref legal event code:REF

Ref document number:1500294

Country of ref document:AT

Kind code of ref document:T

Effective date:20220715

REGReference to a national code

Ref country code:IE

Ref legal event code:FG4D

REGReference to a national code

Ref country code:LT

Ref legal event code:MG9D

REGReference to a national code

Ref country code:NL

Ref legal event code:MP

Effective date:20220622

PG25Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:SE

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20220622

Ref country code:NO

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20220922

Ref country code:LT

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20220622

Ref country code:HR

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20220622

Ref country code:GR

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20220923

Ref country code:FI

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20220622

Ref country code:BG

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20220922

REGReference to a national code

Ref country code:AT

Ref legal event code:MK05

Ref document number:1500294

Country of ref document:AT

Kind code of ref document:T

Effective date:20220622

PG25Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:RS

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20220622

Ref country code:LV

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20220622

PG25Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:NL

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20220622

PG25Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:SM

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20220622

Ref country code:SK

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20220622

Ref country code:RO

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20220622

Ref country code:PT

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20221024

Ref country code:ES

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20220622

Ref country code:EE

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20220622

Ref country code:CZ

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20220622

Ref country code:AT

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20220622

PG25Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:PL

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20220622

Ref country code:IS

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20221022

REGReference to a national code

Ref country code:DE

Ref legal event code:R097

Ref document number:602014084070

Country of ref document:DE

PG25Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:AL

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20220622

PG25Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:DK

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20220622

PLBENo opposition filed within time limit

Free format text:ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAAInformation on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text:STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26NNo opposition filed

Effective date:20230323

PG25Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:SI

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20220622

REGReference to a national code

Ref country code:CH

Ref legal event code:PL

PG25Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:MC

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20220622

REGReference to a national code

Ref country code:BE

Ref legal event code:MM

Effective date:20230531

PG25Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:MC

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20220622

Ref country code:LU

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date:20230510

Ref country code:LI

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date:20230531

Ref country code:IT

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20220622

Ref country code:CH

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date:20230531

REGReference to a national code

Ref country code:IE

Ref legal event code:MM4A

PG25Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:IE

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date:20230510

PG25Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:IE

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date:20230510

PG25Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:BE

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date:20230531

PG25Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:BG

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20220622

REGReference to a national code

Ref country code:DE

Ref legal event code:R079

Ref document number:602014084070

Country of ref document:DE

Free format text:PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: G08G0005040000

Ipc:G08G0005800000

PG25Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:BG

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20220622

PGFPAnnual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:DE

Payment date:20250519

Year of fee payment:12

PGFPAnnual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:GB

Payment date:20250522

Year of fee payment:12

PGFPAnnual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:FR

Payment date:20250521

Year of fee payment:12

PG25Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:CY

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date:20140510

PG25Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:HU

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date:20140510


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp