Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


EP1639060B1 - Converting mist flow to annular flowv in thermal cracking application - Google Patents

Converting mist flow to annular flowv in thermal cracking application
Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1639060B1
EP1639060B1EP03742280AEP03742280AEP1639060B1EP 1639060 B1EP1639060 B1EP 1639060B1EP 03742280 AEP03742280 AEP 03742280AEP 03742280 AEP03742280 AEP 03742280AEP 1639060 B1EP1639060 B1EP 1639060B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
mist
flow
stream
mist stream
flash drum
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP03742280A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1639060A1 (en
Inventor
Richard C. Stell
Arthur R. Dinicolantonio
Jennifer L. Bancroft
George Stephens
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc
Original Assignee
ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US10/188,901external-prioritypatent/US7090765B2/en
Priority claimed from US10/188,461external-prioritypatent/US7138047B2/en
Priority claimed from US10/189,618external-prioritypatent/US7097758B2/en
Application filed by ExxonMobil Chemical Patents IncfiledCriticalExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc
Publication of EP1639060A1publicationCriticalpatent/EP1639060A1/en
Application grantedgrantedCritical
Publication of EP1639060B1publicationCriticalpatent/EP1639060B1/en
Anticipated expirationlegal-statusCritical
Expired - Lifetimelegal-statusCriticalCurrent

Links

Images

Classifications

Definitions

Landscapes

Abstract

A process for feeding or cracking heavy hydrocarbon feedstock containing non-volatile hydrocarbons comprising: heating the heavy hydrocarbon feedstock, mixing the heavy hydrocarbon feedstock with a fluid and/or a primary dilution steam stream to form a mixture, flashing the mixture to form a vapor phase and a liquid phase, and varying the amount of the fluid and/or the primary dilution steam stream mixed with the heavy hydrocarbon feedstock in accordance with at least one selected operating parameter of the process, such as the temperature of the flash stream before entering the flash drum.

Description

  • The present invention relates to converting mist flow to annular flow in a steam cracking application to enhance the flash drum removal efficiency of non-volatile hydrocarbons.
  • Steam cracking has long been used to crack various hydrocarbon feedstocks into olefins. Conventional steam cracking utilizes a furnace which has two main sections: a convection section and a radiant section. The hydrocarbon feedstock typically enters the convection section of the furnace as a liquid (except for light feedstocks which enter as a vapor) wherein it is typically heated and vaporized by indirect contact with hot flue gas from the radiant section and by direct contact with steam. The vaporized feedstock is then introduced into the radiant section where the cracking takes place. The resulting olefins leave the furnace for further downstream processing, such as quenching.
  • Conventional steam cracking systems have been effective for cracking high-quality feedstocks such as gas oil and naphtha. However, steam cracking economics sometimes favor cracking low cost heavy feedstock such as, by way of non-limiting examples, crude oil and atmospheric resid. Crude oil and atmospheric resid contain high molecular weight, non-volatile components with boiling points in excess of 1100°F (590°C). The non-volatile, heavy ends of these feedstocks lay down as coke in the convection section of conventional pyrolysis furnaces. Only very low levels of non-volatiles can be tolerated in the convection section downstream of the point where the lighter components have fully vaporized. Additionally, some naphthas are contaminated with crude oil during transport. Conventional pyrolysis furnaces do not have the flexibility to process resids, crudes, or many resid or crude contaminated gas oils or naphthas, which contain a large fraction of heavy non-volatile hydrocarbons.
  • To solve such coking problem,U.S. Patent 3,617,493 discloses the use of an external vaporization drum for the crude oil feed and discloses the use of a first flash to remove naphtha as vapor and a second flash to remove vapors with a boiling point between 450 and 1100°F (230 and 600°C). The vapors are cracked in the pyrolysis furnace into olefins and the separated liquids from the two flash tanks are removed, stripped with steam, and used as fuel.
  • U.S. Patent 3,718,709 discloses a process to minimize coke deposition. It provides preheating of heavy feed inside or outside a pyrolysis furnace to vaporize about 50% of the heavy feed with superheated steam and the removal of the residual liquid. The vaporized hydrocarbons are subjected to cracking.
  • U.S. Patent 5,190,634 discloses a process for inhibiting coke formation in a furnace by preheating the feed in the presence of a small, critical amount of hydrogen in the convection section. The presence of hydrogen in the convection section inhibits the polymerization reaction of the hydrocarbons thereby inhibiting coke formation.
  • U.S. Patent 5,580,443 discloses a process wherein the feed is first preheated and then withdrawn from a preheater in the convection section of the pyrolysis furnace. This preheated feedstock is then mixed with a predetermined amount of steam (the dilution steam) and is then introduced into a gas-liquid separator to separate and remove a required proportion of the non-volatiles as liquid from the separator. The separated vapor from the gas-liquid separator is returned to the pyrolysis furnace for super-heating and cracking.
  • US 2,158,425 discloses a process for the vacuum steam distillation of heavy hydrocarbon oils to produce lubricating oil distillates. The present inventors have recognized that in using a flash to separate heavy non-volatile hydrocarbons from the lighter volatile hydrocarbons which can be cracked in the pyrolysis furnace, it is important to maximize the non-volatile hydrocarbon removal efficiency. Otherwise, heavy, coke-forming non-volatile hydrocarbons could be entrained in the vapor phase and carried overhead into the furnace creating coking problems.
  • It has been found that in the convection section of a steam cracking pyrolysis furnace, a minimum gas flow is required in the piping to achieve good heat transfer and to maintain a film temperature low enough to reduce coking. Typically, a minimum gas flow velocity of about 100 ft/sec (30 m/sec) has been found to be desirable.
  • When using a flash drum to separate the lighter volatile hydrocarbon as vapor phase from the heavy non-volatile hydrocarbon as liquid phase, the flash stream entering the flash drum usually comprises a vapor phase with liquid (the non-volatile hydrocarbon components) entrained as fine droplets. Therefore, the flash stream is two-phase flow. At the flow velocities required to maintain the required boundary layer film temperature in the piping inside the convection section, this two-phase flow is in a "mist flow" regime. In this mist flow regime, fine droplets comprising non-volatile heavy hydrocarbons are entrained in the vapor phase, which is the volatile hydrocarbons and optionally steam. The two-phase mist flow presents operational problems in the flash drum because at these high gas flow velocities the fine droplets comprising non-volatile hydrocarbons do not coalesce and, therefore, cannot be efficiently removed as liquid phase from the flash drum. It was found that, at a gas flow of 100 feet/second (30 m/s) velocity, the flash drum can only remove heavy non-volatile hydrocarbons at a low efficiency of about 73%.
  • The present invention provides a process for the effective removal of non-volatile hydrocarbon liquid from the volatile hydrocarbon vapor in the flash drum. The present invention provides a process that converts a "mist flow" regime to an "annular flow" regime and hence significantly enhances the separation of non-volatile and volatile hydrocarbons in the flash drum. According to the inventions there are provided process for treating heavy carbon feed stocks as defined in the accompanying claims.
  • In an embodiment of the present invention there is provided a process for treating a heavy hydrocarbon feedstock which comprises preheating the heavy hydrocarbon feedstock, optionally comprising steam, in the convection section of a steam cracking furnace to vaporize a portion of the feedstock and form a mist stream comprising liquid droplets comprising non-volatile hydrocarbon in volatile hydrocarbon vapor, optionally with steam, the mist stream upon leaving the convection section having a first flow velocity and a first flow direction, treating the mist stream to coalesce the liquid droplets, the treating comprising first reducing the flow velocity followed by changing the flow direction, separating at least a portion of the liquid droplets from the vapor in a flash drum to form a vapor phase and a liquid phase, and feeding the vapor phase to the thermal cracking furnace.
  • In one embodiment of the present invention, the vapor phase is fed to a lower convection section and radiant section of the steam cracking furnace.
  • In one embodiment, the treating of the mist flow comprises reducing the flow velocity of the mist stream. The mist stream flow velocity can be reduced by at least 40%. The mist stream velocity can be reduced to less than 60 feet/second (18 m/s).
  • According to another embodiment, the mist stream flow velocity is reduced and then is subjected to at least one centrifugal force, such that the liquid droplets coalesce. The mist stream can be subjected to at least one change in its flow direction.
  • In yet another embodiment in accordance with the present invention, the mist stream droplets are coalesced in a distance of less than 25 pipe diameters, preferably in less than 8 inside pipe diameters, and most preferably in less than 4 inside pipe diameters.
  • According to another embodiment, the mist stream flows through a flow path that comprises at least one bend. The flow path can further comprise at least one expander. Preferably, the flow path comprises multiple bends. The bends can be at least 45 degrees, 90 degrees, 180 degrees, or combination thereof.
  • In yet another embodiment, the mist stream is converted into an annular flow stream. The flash efficiency can be increased to at least 85%, preferably at least 95%, more preferably at least 99%, and most preferably at least 99.8%. The mist stream can be converted into an annular flow stream in less than 50 pipe diameters, preferably in less than 25 pipe diameters, more preferably in less than 8 pipe diameters, and most preferably in less than 4 pipe diameters.
  • The following embodiment does not form part of the invention but is nonetheless useful for understanding the invention as this concerns a process for treating a hydrocarbon feedstock that comprises: preheating a hydrocarbon feedstock, optionally including steam, in the convection section of a thermal cracking furnace to vaporize a portion of the feedstock and form a mist stream comprising liquid droplets comprising hydrocarbon in hydrocarbon vapor, optionally with steam, the mist stream upon leaving the convection section having a first flow velocity and a first flow direction, treating the mist stream to coalesce the liquid droplets, separating at least a portion of the liquid droplets from the vapor in a flash drum to form a vapor phase and a liquid phase, and feeding the vapor phase to the steam cracking furnace, wherein the flash comprises introducing the mist stream containing coalesced liquid droplets into a flash drum, removing the vapor phase from at least one upper flash drum outlet and removing the liquid phase from at least one lower flash drum outlet.
  • The present invention also discloses another embodiment in which the mist stream is tangentially introduced into the flash drum through at least one tangential drum inlet.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURE
    • Figure 1 illustrates a schematic flow diagram of a steam cracking process.
    • Figure 2 illustrates the design of expanders.
    • Figure 3 illustrates the design of a flash drum in accordance with the present invention.
    DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • Unless otherwise stated, all percentages, parts, ratios, etc. are by weight.
  • Unless otherwise stated, a reference to a compound or component includes the compound or component by itself, as well as in combination with other compounds or components, such as mixtures of compounds.
  • Further, when an amount, concentration, or other value or parameter, is given as a list of upper preferable values and lower preferable values, this is to be understood as specifically disclosing all ranges formed from any pair of an upper preferred value and a lower preferred value, regardless whether ranges are separately disclosed.
    Also as used herein:
    • Flow regimes are visual or qualitative properties of fluid flow. There is no set velocity and no set drop size. Mist flow refers to a two-phase flow where tiny droplets of liquid are dispersed in the vapor phase flowing through a pipe. In clear pipe, mist flow looks like fast moving small rain droplets.
    • Annular flow refers to a two-phase flow where liquid flows as streams on the inside surface of a pipe and the vapor flows in the core of the pipe. The vapor flow velocity of annular flow is about 20 feet/second (6 m/s). In clear pipe, a layer of fast moving liquid is observed. Few droplets of liquid are observed in the core of the vapor flow. At the pipe exit, the liquid usually drips out and only a small amount of mist is observed. The change from mist to annular flow usually includes a transition period where mist and annular flow exist together.
    • The feedstock comprises at least two components: volatile hydrocarbons and non-volatile hydrocarbons. The mist flow, in accordance with the present invention, comprises fine droplets of non-volatile hydrocarbons entrained in volatile hydrocarbon vapor.
    • The non-volatile removal efficiency is calculated as follows:Non-volatile Removal Efficiency=1-Non-volatiles in the vapor phase leaving flashmass/timeNon-volatiles in the hydrocarbon entering the flashmass/time*100%
      Figure imgb0001
  • Hydrocarbon is the sum of vapor (generally volatile) and liquid (generally non-volatile) hydrocarbon. Non-volatiles are measured as follows: The boiling point distribution of the hydrocarbon feed is measured by Gas Chromatograph Distillation (GCD) by ASTM D-6352-98. Non-volatiles are the fraction of the hydrocarbon with a nominal boiling point above 1100°F (590°C) as measured by ASTM D-6352-98. This invention works very well with non-volatiles having a nominal boiling point above 1400°F (760°C).
  • The fraction of non-volatile 1100 to 1400°F (590 to 760°C) in the whole hydrocarbon to the furnace and a sample of the flash drum overhead after water is removed are analyzed by ASTM D-6352-98.
  • A process for cracking ahydrocarbon feedstock 10 of the present invention as illustrated inFigure 1 comprises preheating a hydrocarbon feedstock by a bank of exchanger tubes 2, with or without the presence ofwater 11 andsteam 12 in the upper convection section 1 of asteam cracking furnace 3 to vaporize a portion of the feedstock and to form amist stream 13 comprising liquid droplets comprising non-volatile hydrocarbons in volatile hydrocarbon/steam vapor. The further preheating of the feedstock/water/steam mixture can be carried out through a bank of heat exchange tubes 6. The mist stream upon leaving theconvection section 14 has a first flow velocity and a first flow direction. The process also comprises treating the mist stream to coalesce the liquid droplets, separating at least a portion of the liquid droplets from the hydrocarbon vapor in aflash 5 to form avapor phase 15 and aliquid phase 16, and feeding thevapor phase 8 to the lower convection section and the radiant section of the thermal cracking furnace.
  • As noted, the feedstock is a hydrocarbon. Any hydrocarbon feedstock having heavy non-volatile heavy ends can advantageously be utilized in the process. Such feedstock could comprise, by way of non-limiting examples, one or more of steam cracked gas oil and residues, gas oils, heating oil, jet fuel, diesel, kerosene, gasoline, coker naphtha, steam cracked naphtha, catalytically cracked naphtha, hydrocrackate, reformate, raffinate reformate, Fischer-Tropsch liquids, Fischer-Tropsch gases, natural gasoline, distillate, virgin naphtha, crude oil, atmospheric pipestill bottoms, vacuum pipestill streams including bottoms, wide boiling range naphtha to gas oil condensates, heavy non-virgin hydrocarbon streams from refineries, vacuum gas oils, heavy gas oil, naphtha contaminated with crude, atmospheric resid, heavy residium, C4's/residue admixture, and naphtha residue admixture.
  • The heavy hydrocarbon feedstock has a nominal end boiling point of at least 600°F (310°C). The preferred feedstocks are low sulfur waxy resids, atmospheric resids, and naphthas contaminated with crude. The most preferred is resid comprising 60-80% components having boiling points below 1100°F (590°C), for example, low sulfur waxy resids.
  • As noted, the heavy hydrocarbon feedstock is preheated in the upper convection section of the furnace 1. The feedstock may optionally be mixed with steam before preheating or after preheating (e.g., after preheating in preheater 2) in asparger 4. The preheating of the heavy hydrocarbon can take any form known by those of ordinary skill in the art. It is preferred that the heating comprises indirect contact of the feedstock in the convection section of the furnace with hot flue gases from the radiant section of the furnace. This can be accomplished, by way of non-limiting example, by passing the feedstock through a bank of heat exchange tubes 2 located within the upper convection section 1 of thepyrolysis furnace 3. Thepreheated feedstock 14 before the control system 6 has a temperature between 600 and 950°F (310 and 510°C). Preferably the temperature of the heated feedstock is about 700 to 920°F (370 to 490°C), more preferably between 750 and 900°F (400 and 480°C) and most preferably between 810 and 890°F (430 and 475°C).
  • As a result of preheating, a portion of the feedstock is vaporized and a mist stream is formed comprising liquid droplets comprising non-volatile hydrocarbon in volatile hydrocarbon vapor, with or without steam. At flow velocities of greater than 30 m/s (100 feet/second), the liquid is present as fine droplets comprising non-volatile hydrocarbons entrained in the vapor phase. This two-phase mist flow is extremely difficult to separate into liquid and vapor. It is necessary to coalesce the fine mist into large droplets before entering the flash drum. However, flow velocities of 30 m/s (100 ft/sec) or greater are normally necessary to practically effect the transfer of heat from the hot flue gases and reduce coking in convection section.
  • In accordance with the present invention, the mist stream is treated to coalesce the liquid droplets. The treating comprises reducing the velocity of the mist stream. It is found that reducing the velocity of the mist stream leavingconvection section 14 before the flash 5 (location 9 inFigure 1) helps coalesce the mist stream. It is preferred to reduce the mist stream velocity by at least 40%, preferably at least 70%, more preferably at least 80%, and most preferably 85%. It is also preferred to reduce the velocity of the mist flow stream leaving the convection section from at least 100 feet/second (30 m/s) to a velocity of less than 60 feet/second (18 m/s), more preferably to less than 30 feet/second (27 to 9 m/s), and most preferably to less than 15 feet/second (27 to 5 m/s).
  • Annular flow can be achieved by reducing flow velocity due to friction in large diameter pipes. In order to achieve the required reduction to convert mist flow into annular flow, a substantial length of piping is necessary. The required length of piping is defined in terms of the number of inside pipe diameters. Engineering practices require that after reducing the mist flow velocity to 60 feet/second (18 m/s), the friction from 50 to 150 pipe diameters of straight pipe (for instance 24 inches x 100 = 200 feet or 0.6 meters x 100 = 60 meters) is needed to establish annular flow.
  • The reduction of velocity of the mist flow stream is accomplished by including in the piping outside the convection section one or more expanders. In a close system, at least one expander is believed necessary to achieve the preferred reduction of velocity. By way of non-limiting examples, the expander can be asimple cone shape 101 ormanifolds 102 as illustrated inFigure 2. With the cross section area of the outlet end greater than the cross section area of the sum of all the inlets. In a preferred embodiment in accordance with this invention, the mist flow is subject to at least one expander first and then to at least one bend, preferably multiple bends, with various degrees. When the mist flow stream flows through the expander(s), the velocity will decrease. The number of expanders can vary according to the amount of velocity reduction required. As a general practice rule, more expanders can be used if high velocity reduction is required. Any expanders, for example, a manifold, can be used in the present invention.
  • Although expanders alone will reduce the velocity such that annular flow will be established, at least one bend is used following the reduction in velocity. The bend acts like a centrifuge. The liquid droplets flow to the outer wall of the bend where they can coalesce.
  • The present invention enables the conversion of mist flow to annular flow in significantly less piping. According to the present invention, the mist stream droplets are coalesced in less than 25, more preferably less than 8, and most preferably less than 4 inside pipe diameters.
  • In accordance with the present invention, treating of the mist stream comprises subjecting the mist stream to at least one expander and one centrifugal force downstream of the expander such that the liquid droplets will coalesce. This is accomplished by subjecting the mist stream to at least one change in its flow direction. The piping outside the convection section is designed to include at least one bend in order to convert a mist flow stream into an annular flow stream. The bends can be located throughout the piping downstream of the expander between thecontrol system 17 and just before the flash drum.
  • Different angle bends can be used. For example, 45 degree, 90 degree, and/or 180 degree bends can be used in the present invention. After an expander, the 180 degree bend provides the most vapor core velocity reduction. In one embodiment of the present invention, the process includes at least one bend of at least 45 degrees. In another embodiment, the process includes at least one bend of 90 degrees. In yet another embodiment, the process includes at least one bend of 180 degrees.
  • It is found that using the inventions disclosed herein, a flash drum removal efficiency of at least 85% can be accomplished. A preferred flash efficiency of at least 95%, a more preferred flash efficiency of at least 99%, and a most preferred flash efficiency of at least 99.8% can also be achieved using the present invention.
  • After the required reduction of velocity, e.g., in a combination of expanders, the fine droplets in the mist flow stream will coalesce in one or more bends and thus are easily separated from the vapor phase stream in theflash drum 5. Flash is normally carried out in at least one flash drum. In theflash drum 5, the vapor phase stream is removed from at least one upper flash drum outlet and the liquid phase is removed from at least one lower flash drum outlet. Preferably, two or more lower flash drum outlets are present in the flash for liquid phase removal.
  • The following embodiment does not form part of the invention but is nonetheless useful for understanding the invention as this concerns a process for treating a hydrocarbon feedstock that comprises: heating a liquid hydrocarbon feedstock in the convection section of a thermal cracking furnace to vaporize a portion of the feedstock and form a mist stream comprising liquid droplets comprising hydrocarbon in hydrocarbon vapor, with or without steam, the mist stream upon leaving the convection section having a first flow velocity and a first flow direction, treating the mist stream to coalesce the liquid droplets, separating at least a portion of the liquid droplets from the hydrocarbon vapor in a flash drum to form a vapor phase and a liquid phase, and feeding the vapor phase to the radiant section of the steam cracking furnace, wherein the flash comprises introducing the stream containing coalesced liquid droplets into a flash drum, removing the vapor phase from at least one upper flash drum outlet and removing the liquid phase from at least one lower flash drum outlet.
  • A flash drum in accordance to the present invention is illustrated inFigure 3. The removal efficiency of the flash drum decreases as liquid droplet size entering the flash drum decreases. The droplet size decreases with increasing gas velocity. To increase separation efficiency, a sufficient length of pipe, expanders, and bends are required to establish a stable droplet larger size at a lower velocity.
  • To further increase the removal efficiency of the non-volatile hydrocarbons in the flash drum, it is preferred that the flash stream 9 ofFigure 1 enters the flash drum tangentially through at least one tangentialflash drum inlet 201 ofFigure 3. Preferably, the tangential inlets are level or slightly downward flow. The non-volatile hydrocarbon liquid phase will form an outer annular flow along the inside flash drum wall and the volatile vapor phase will initially form an inner core and then flow upwardly in the flash drum. In one preferred embodiment, the tangential entries should be the same direction as the Coriolis effect.
  • The liquid phase is removed from one bottom flash drum outlet. Optionally, a side flash drum outlet (203) or a vortex breaker can be added to prevent a vortex forming in the outlet. The upward inner core flow of vapor phase is diverted around anannular baffle 202 inside the flash drum and removed from at least one upperflash drum outlet 204. The baffle is installed inside the flash drum to further avoid and reduce any portion of the separated liquid phase, flowing downwards in the flash drum, from being entrained in the upflow vapor phase in the flash drum. The vapor phase, preferably, flows to the lower convection section 7 ofFigure 1 and throughcrossover pipes 8 to the radiant section of the pyrolysis furnace.
  • The invention is illustrated by the following Example, which is provided for the purpose of representation, and is not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention. Unless stated otherwise, all percentages, parts, etc., are by weight.
  • Example 1
  • The vapor/liquid separation efficiency of a flash drum separation is highly dependent on droplet size. Stoke's law teaches that the terminal velocity of a drop or a particle is proportional to its diameter squared. Hence, if a very fine mist enters a flash drum, the upward gas velocity will be greater than the terminal velocity of the droplets causing entrainment. Extensive coalescing of droplets into annular flow produces very large droplets which separate easily in a flash drum.
  • Annular flow can be effected by reducing the bulk flow velocity and allowing sufficient time and friction for coalescing of droplets. After the bulk velocity is reduced, roughly 100 pipe flow diameters are required to coalesce drops. Air/water flow tests were conducted to determine how to produce annular flow in less than 100 pipe diameters. Two 6 HP blowers produced a high velocity gas in 0,05 m ID (2" ID pipe). The air from the two blowers combine in a Y-fitting and flow into the 0,05 m ID of clear pipe (2" ID clear pipe). Just before the clear pipe is a T-fitting where water is added to produce the mist flow. An anemometer at the end of the piping system measures the fluid velocity.
  • Various piping bends, for example 45 degrees, elbows, and return bends, and expanders were tested to observe whether the fine droplet in the mist flow stream coalesced. They are summarized below in Table 1.TABLE 1
    Observation of Droplet Coalescing
    TestDescriptionObservation
    1Added 0,0227 m3/min (6 GPM) of water to the air producing two phase flow at 33,5 m (110ft/sec) bulk velocityFine droplet mist flow in (2" ID pipe) 0.05 m ID
    2Added a 90° bend to provide a centrifugal forceMist flow is intensified
    3To the end of the straight (2" ID) 0.05 m ID pipe added an expander and (6 ft) 1.8 m of (3") 0.075 m clear pipeMist flow throughout the (6 it or 25 IDs of 3" clear pipe) 1.8 m or 25 ID of 0.075 mclear pipe
    4Added(12 ft) 3.6 m more of (3") 0.075 m clear pipe to test 3 for a total of (18 ft) 3.6 m or 75 diametersSome droplet coalescing but mist still exists
    5To the end of the straight (2") 0.05 m ID pipe added an expander to (3") 0.075 m ID, a 90° elbow and (6 ft) 1.8 m of (3") 0.075 m clear pipe - velocity (50 ft/sec) 15 m/s.Significant coalescing of droplet drops - annular flow with some mist.
    6To the end of the (2") 0.05 m ID pipe added an expander to (6") 0.15 m ID, 90° elbow, 1.20 m (4 ft) of (6") 0.15 m ID pipe, 90° elbow and (4ft) 1.20 m of (6") 0.15 m ID pipeAnnular and stratified flow with less than a trace of mist
  • The conclusions of the observations are as follows: Test 2 showed that a bend alone at high velocity does not coalesce droplets and may even produce a finer mist.Tests 3 and 4 showed that an expander alone did not coalesce droplets enough even after 75 pipe diameters of the larger diameter pipe.Tests 5 and 6 showed that expanders followed by bends with short lengths of straight pipe did coalesce droplets. The larger the expanders followed by bends, the more complete the droplet coalescing into annular and even stratified flow.

Claims (22)

  1. A process for treating a heavy hydrocarbon feedstock comprising:
    a) preheating the heavy hydrocarbon feedstock, optionally comprising steam, in a convection section of a steam cracking furnace to vaporize a portion of the feedstock and form a mist stream comprising liquid droplets comprising non-volatile hydrocarbon in volatile hydrocarbon vapor, optionally with steam, the mist stream upon leaving the convection section having a flow velocity and a flow direction,
    b) treating the mist stream to coalesce the liquid droplets wherein the treating comprises
    c) first reducing the flow velocity followed by
    d) changing the flow direction
    e) separating at least a portion of the liquid droplets from the vapor in a flash drum to form a vapor phase and a liquid phase, and
    f) feeding the vapor phase to the steam cracking furnace.
  2. The process of claim 1 further comprising feeding the vapor phase to a lower convection section and radiant section of the steam cracking furnace.
  3. The process of claim 1 or 2, wherein the heavy hydrocarbon feedstock comprises one or more of steam cracked gas oil and residues, gas oils, heating oil, jet fuel, diesel, kerosene, gasoline, coker naphtha, steam cracked naphtha, catalytically cracked naphtha, hydrocrackate, reformate, raffinate reformate, Fischer-Tropsch liquids, Fischer-Tropsch gases, natural gasoline, distillate, virgin naphtha, crude oil, atmospheric pipestill bottoms, vacuum pipestill streams including bottoms, wide boiling range naphtha to gas oil condensates, heavy non-virgin hydrocarbon streams from refineries, vacuum gas oils, heavy gas oil, naphtha contaminated with crude, atmospheric resid, heavy residium, C4's/residue admixture, and naphtha/residue admixture.
  4. The process according to claim 1, 2, or 3, wherein the heavy hydrocarbon feedstock comprises low sulfur waxy resid.
  5. The process according to any preceding claim, wherein 60 to 80 percent of the heavy hydrocarbon feedstock boils below 590°C (1100°F).
  6. The process of any preceding claim, wherein the flow velocity of the mist stream is reduced by at least 40%.
  7. The process of any preceding claim, wherein the flow velocity of the mist stream is reduced to less than 18 m/s (60 feet/second).
  8. The process of any preceding claim, wherein the treating comprises first reducing the flow velocity of the mist stream to less than 18m/s (60 ft/sec) and then subjecting the mist stream to at least one centrifugal force such that the liquid droplets coalesce.
  9. The process of any preceding claim, wherein droplets in the mist stream are substantially coalesced in less than 25 pipe diameters.
  10. The process of any preceding claim, wherein droplets in the mist stream are substantially coalesced in less than 4 pipe diameters.
  11. The process of any preceding claim, wherein the mist stream flows through a flow path that comprises first at least one expander and at least one bend.
  12. The process of any preceding claim, wherein treating converts the mist into an annular flow stream.
  13. The process of any preceding claim, wherein the flash drum achieves a non-volatile separation efficiency of at least 85%.
  14. The process of any preceding claim, wherein the flash drum achieves a non-volatile separation efficiency of at least 95%.
  15. The process of any preceding claim, wherein the flash drum achieves a non-volatile separation efficiency of at least 99%.
  16. The process of any preceding claim, wherein the flash drum achieves a non-volatile separation efficiency of at least 99.8%.
  17. The process of any preceding claim, wherein the mist stream is in the mist flow regime and converted into an annular flow regime in less than 25 pipe diameters.
  18. The process of any preceding claim, wherein the mist stream is in the mist flow regime and converted into an annular flow regime in less than 4 pipe diameters.
  19. The process of any preceding claim, wherein the mist stream flows through a flow path that comprises multiple bends.
  20. The process of claim 19, wherein at least one bend is at least 45 degrees.
  21. The process of claim 19 or 20, wherein at least one bend is at least 90 degrees.
  22. The process of claim 19, 20, or 21, wherein at least one bend is 180 degrees.
EP03742280A2002-07-032003-06-27Converting mist flow to annular flowv in thermal cracking applicationExpired - LifetimeEP1639060B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application NumberPriority DateFiling DateTitle
US10/188,901US7090765B2 (en)2002-07-032002-07-03Process for cracking hydrocarbon feed with water substitution
US10/188,461US7138047B2 (en)2002-07-032002-07-03Process for steam cracking heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks
US10/189,618US7097758B2 (en)2002-07-032002-07-03Converting mist flow to annular flow in thermal cracking application
PCT/US2003/020375WO2004005431A1 (en)2002-07-032003-06-27Converting mist flow to annular flow in thermal cracking application

Publications (2)

Publication NumberPublication Date
EP1639060A1 EP1639060A1 (en)2006-03-29
EP1639060B1true EP1639060B1 (en)2008-05-21

Family

ID=30119026

Family Applications (3)

Application NumberTitlePriority DateFiling Date
EP03763036.5AExpired - LifetimeEP1523534B1 (en)2002-07-032003-06-27Process for cracking hydrocarbon feed with water substitution
EP03763037.3AExpired - LifetimeEP1527151B1 (en)2002-07-032003-06-27Process for steam cracking heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks
EP03742280AExpired - LifetimeEP1639060B1 (en)2002-07-032003-06-27Converting mist flow to annular flowv in thermal cracking application

Family Applications Before (2)

Application NumberTitlePriority DateFiling Date
EP03763036.5AExpired - LifetimeEP1523534B1 (en)2002-07-032003-06-27Process for cracking hydrocarbon feed with water substitution
EP03763037.3AExpired - LifetimeEP1527151B1 (en)2002-07-032003-06-27Process for steam cracking heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks

Country Status (9)

CountryLink
EP (3)EP1523534B1 (en)
JP (3)JP5166674B2 (en)
KR (2)KR100979027B1 (en)
CN (3)CN1281715C (en)
AT (1)ATE396244T1 (en)
AU (3)AU2003281371A1 (en)
CA (3)CA2489888C (en)
SG (1)SG177003A1 (en)
WO (3)WO2004005433A1 (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
US8893513B2 (en)2012-05-072014-11-25Phononic Device, Inc.Thermoelectric heat exchanger component including protective heat spreading lid and optimal thermal interface resistance
US8991194B2 (en)2012-05-072015-03-31Phononic Devices, Inc.Parallel thermoelectric heat exchange systems
US9593871B2 (en)2014-07-212017-03-14Phononic Devices, Inc.Systems and methods for operating a thermoelectric module to increase efficiency
US10458683B2 (en)2014-07-212019-10-29Phononic, Inc.Systems and methods for mitigating heat rejection limitations of a thermoelectric module
EP3938472A1 (en)*2019-03-152022-01-19Lummus Technology LLCProcess for mixing dilution steam with liquid hydrocarbons before steam cracking
RU2812222C2 (en)*2019-03-152024-01-25ЛАММУС ТЕКНОЛОДЖИ ЭлЭлСиMethod for mixing diluting steam with liquid hydrocarbons before steam cracking

Families Citing this family (31)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
US7097758B2 (en)2002-07-032006-08-29Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc.Converting mist flow to annular flow in thermal cracking application
US7138047B2 (en)2002-07-032006-11-21Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc.Process for steam cracking heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks
US7090765B2 (en)2002-07-032006-08-15Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc.Process for cracking hydrocarbon feed with water substitution
ATE552322T1 (en)*2004-03-222012-04-15Exxonmobil Chem Patents Inc METHOD FOR STEAM CRACKING HEAVY HYDROCARBON FEEDS
US7488459B2 (en)2004-05-212009-02-10Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc.Apparatus and process for controlling temperature of heated feed directed to a flash drum whose overhead provides feed for cracking
US7408093B2 (en)2004-07-142008-08-05Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc.Process for reducing fouling from flash/separation apparatus during cracking of hydrocarbon feedstocks
US7311746B2 (en)2004-05-212007-12-25Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc.Vapor/liquid separation apparatus for use in cracking hydrocarbon feedstock containing resid
US7351872B2 (en)2004-05-212008-04-01Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc.Process and draft control system for use in cracking a heavy hydrocarbon feedstock in a pyrolysis furnace
US7312371B2 (en)2004-05-212007-12-25Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc.Steam cracking of hydrocarbon feedstocks containing non-volatile components and/or coke precursors
US7297833B2 (en)2004-05-212007-11-20Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc.Steam cracking of light hydrocarbon feedstocks containing non-volatile components and/or coke precursors
ATE428764T1 (en)*2004-05-212009-05-15Exxonmobil Chem Patents Inc METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLING THE TEMPERATURE OF A HEATED FUEL FOR A FLASH DRUM WHICH OVERHEAD PROVIDES FUEL FOR CRACKING
US7358413B2 (en)2004-07-142008-04-15Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc.Process for reducing fouling from flash/separation apparatus during cracking of hydrocarbon feedstocks
US7402237B2 (en)2004-10-282008-07-22Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc.Steam cracking of hydrocarbon feedstocks containing salt and/or particulate matter
US7481871B2 (en)2004-12-102009-01-27Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc.Vapor/liquid separation apparatus
US7247765B2 (en)2004-05-212007-07-24Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc.Cracking hydrocarbon feedstock containing resid utilizing partial condensation of vapor phase from vapor/liquid separation to mitigate fouling in a flash/separation vessel
WO2006037806A1 (en)*2004-10-082006-04-13Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V.Process to prepare lower olefins from a fischer-tropsch synthesis product
WO2007047657A1 (en)2005-10-202007-04-26Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc.Hydrocarbon resid processing
GB0625528D0 (en)2006-12-212007-01-31Exxonmobil Chem Patents IncOligomerisation of olefins
KR100931792B1 (en)2007-05-252009-12-11주식회사 엘지화학 Catalyst for pyrolysis of hydrocarbon steam, preparation method thereof and preparation method of olefin using the same
ITMI20071209A1 (en)*2007-06-152008-12-16Eni Spa PROCESS FOR THE PURIFICATION OF AN AQUEOUS CURRENT COMING FROM THE FISCHER-TROPSCH REACTION
KR100999304B1 (en)2007-07-052010-12-08주식회사 엘지화학 Hydrocarbon Pyrolysis Process for Olefin Production
WO2009025640A1 (en)*2007-08-212009-02-26Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc.Process and apparatus for steam cracking hydrocarbon feedstocks
US8882991B2 (en)2009-08-212014-11-11Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc.Process and apparatus for cracking high boiling point hydrocarbon feedstock
JP5774122B2 (en)*2010-12-102015-09-02エクソンモービル ケミカル パテンツ インコーポレイテッド Method and apparatus for obtaining aromatic compounds from various raw materials
US9181146B2 (en)2010-12-102015-11-10Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc.Process for the production of xylenes and light olefins
US9181147B2 (en)2012-05-072015-11-10Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc.Process for the production of xylenes and light olefins
CN103215071A (en)*2013-04-122013-07-24大连理工大学Fischer-Tropsch oil catalyzing and upgrading method
CN109694730B (en)*2017-10-242022-01-04中国石油化工股份有限公司Method and device for preparing low-carbon olefin by cracking crude oil
CN112694908B (en)*2020-12-152022-03-25浙江大学Efficient petroleum hydrocarbon cracking method
CN116724101A (en)*2021-01-182023-09-08埃克森美孚化学专利公司Method and system for processing hydrocarbon streams
FI131014B1 (en)*2022-06-162024-07-31Coolbrook Oy Prevention of coke formation in hydrocarbon processing equipment

Family Cites Families (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
GB1053751A (en)*1900-01-01
GB199766A (en)*1922-02-271923-06-27Richard Wright HannaProcess for the continuous production of low boiling point hydrocarbons from petroleum oils
US2091261A (en)*1929-04-171937-08-31Universal Oil Prod CoProcess for hydrocarbon oil conversion
US1984569A (en)*1932-03-121934-12-18Alco Products IncVapor phase cracking process
US2158425A (en)*1936-01-041939-05-16Union Oil CoVacuum steam distillation of heavy oils
DE1468183A1 (en)1963-04-181969-05-29Lummus Co Process for the production of unsaturated hydrocarbons by pyrolysis
NL6802193A (en)*1967-02-231968-08-26
ES348993A1 (en)*1967-04-261969-04-01Continental Oil CoProcess for improving the quality of a carbon black oil
US4264432A (en)*1979-10-021981-04-28Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.Pre-heat vaporization system
US4311580A (en)*1979-11-011982-01-19Engelhard Minerals & Chemicals CorporationSelective vaporization process and dynamic control thereof
US4543177A (en)*1984-06-111985-09-24Allied CorporationProduction of light hydrocarbons by treatment of heavy hydrocarbons with water
US4854944A (en)*1985-05-061989-08-08Strong William HMethod for gasifying toxic and hazardous waste oil
US4840725A (en)*1987-06-191989-06-20The Standard Oil CompanyConversion of high boiling liquid organic materials to lower boiling materials
JPH0819420B2 (en)*1988-09-051996-02-28三井石油化学工業株式会社 Degradation method for low-grade raw materials
US5190634A (en)*1988-12-021993-03-02Lummus Crest Inc.Inhibition of coke formation during vaporization of heavy hydrocarbons
US4940828A (en)*1989-10-131990-07-10The M. W. Kellogg CompanySteam cracking feed gas saturation
US5096567A (en)*1989-10-161992-03-17The Standard Oil CompanyHeavy oil upgrading under dense fluid phase conditions utilizing emulsified feed stocks
US5120892A (en)*1989-12-221992-06-09Phillips Petroleum CompanyMethod and apparatus for pyrolytically cracking hydrocarbons
FR2710070A1 (en)*1993-09-171995-03-24Procedes Petroliers Petrochim Method and device for steam cracking a light load and a heavy load.
US6179997B1 (en)*1999-07-212001-01-30Phillips Petroleum CompanyAtomizer system containing a perforated pipe sparger

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
US8893513B2 (en)2012-05-072014-11-25Phononic Device, Inc.Thermoelectric heat exchanger component including protective heat spreading lid and optimal thermal interface resistance
US8991194B2 (en)2012-05-072015-03-31Phononic Devices, Inc.Parallel thermoelectric heat exchange systems
US9103572B2 (en)2012-05-072015-08-11Phononic Devices, Inc.Physically separated hot side and cold side heat sinks in a thermoelectric refrigeration system
US9234682B2 (en)2012-05-072016-01-12Phononic Devices, Inc.Two-phase heat exchanger mounting
US9310111B2 (en)2012-05-072016-04-12Phononic Devices, Inc.Systems and methods to mitigate heat leak back in a thermoelectric refrigeration system
US9341394B2 (en)2012-05-072016-05-17Phononic Devices, Inc.Thermoelectric heat exchange system comprising cascaded cold side heat sinks
US10012417B2 (en)2012-05-072018-07-03Phononic, Inc.Thermoelectric refrigeration system control scheme for high efficiency performance
US9593871B2 (en)2014-07-212017-03-14Phononic Devices, Inc.Systems and methods for operating a thermoelectric module to increase efficiency
US10458683B2 (en)2014-07-212019-10-29Phononic, Inc.Systems and methods for mitigating heat rejection limitations of a thermoelectric module
EP3938472A1 (en)*2019-03-152022-01-19Lummus Technology LLCProcess for mixing dilution steam with liquid hydrocarbons before steam cracking
RU2812222C2 (en)*2019-03-152024-01-25ЛАММУС ТЕКНОЛОДЖИ ЭлЭлСиMethod for mixing diluting steam with liquid hydrocarbons before steam cracking

Also Published As

Publication numberPublication date
CA2489888C (en)2011-07-12
AU2003247755A1 (en)2004-01-23
ATE396244T1 (en)2008-06-15
KR100979027B1 (en)2010-08-30
CA2489888A1 (en)2004-01-15
CA2490403A1 (en)2004-01-15
EP1527151B1 (en)2018-07-18
AU2003281371A1 (en)2004-01-23
JP2005531684A (en)2005-10-20
AU2003247756A1 (en)2004-01-23
KR20050016709A (en)2005-02-21
CN1665908A (en)2005-09-07
WO2004005432A1 (en)2004-01-15
JP4403071B2 (en)2010-01-20
WO2004005431A1 (en)2004-01-15
JP4387301B2 (en)2009-12-16
CA2489876C (en)2011-04-19
CN100494318C (en)2009-06-03
CA2490403C (en)2011-06-07
KR100945121B1 (en)2010-03-02
JP5166674B2 (en)2013-03-21
CA2489876A1 (en)2004-01-15
SG177003A1 (en)2012-01-30
EP1523534B1 (en)2017-07-19
CN1281715C (en)2006-10-25
JP2006508198A (en)2006-03-09
KR20050016708A (en)2005-02-21
CN100587030C (en)2010-02-03
CN1665910A (en)2005-09-07
WO2004005433A1 (en)2004-01-15
JP2005531683A (en)2005-10-20
EP1527151A1 (en)2005-05-04
CN1665909A (en)2005-09-07
EP1639060A1 (en)2006-03-29
EP1523534A1 (en)2005-04-20

Similar Documents

PublicationPublication DateTitle
EP1639060B1 (en)Converting mist flow to annular flowv in thermal cracking application
US7097758B2 (en)Converting mist flow to annular flow in thermal cracking application
US7641870B2 (en)Process for reducing fouling from flash/separation apparatus during cracking of hydrocarbon feedstocks
US7427381B2 (en)Vapor/liquid separation apparatus for use in cracking hydrocarbon feedstock containing resid
US7776286B2 (en)Process for reducing fouling from flash/separation apparatus during cracking of hydrocarbon feedstocks
EP1761615B1 (en)METHOD for CRACKING A HYDROCARBON FEEDSTOCK CONTAINING RESID AND CRACKING APPARATUS THEREFOR
US7297833B2 (en)Steam cracking of light hydrocarbon feedstocks containing non-volatile components and/or coke precursors
US7247765B2 (en)Cracking hydrocarbon feedstock containing resid utilizing partial condensation of vapor phase from vapor/liquid separation to mitigate fouling in a flash/separation vessel
US7767008B2 (en)Vapor/liquid separation apparatus
US7220887B2 (en)Process and apparatus for cracking hydrocarbon feedstock containing resid
WO2020190777A1 (en)Process for mixing dilution steam with liquid hydrocarbons before steam cracking
WO2009025640A1 (en)Process and apparatus for steam cracking hydrocarbon feedstocks

Legal Events

DateCodeTitleDescription
PUAIPublic reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text:ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17PRequest for examination filed

Effective date:20050202

AKDesignated contracting states

Kind code of ref document:A1

Designated state(s):AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR

DAXRequest for extension of the european patent (deleted)
17QFirst examination report despatched

Effective date:20061229

GRAPDespatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text:ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRASGrant fee paid

Free format text:ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA(expected) grant

Free format text:ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

RIN1Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name:STEPHENS, GEORGE

Inventor name:BANCROFT, JENNIFER, L.

Inventor name:STELL, RICHARD,C.

Inventor name:DINICOLANTONIO, ARTHUR, R.

AKDesignated contracting states

Kind code of ref document:B1

Designated state(s):AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REGReference to a national code

Ref country code:GB

Ref legal event code:FG4D

REGReference to a national code

Ref country code:CH

Ref legal event code:EP

REFCorresponds to:

Ref document number:60321239

Country of ref document:DE

Date of ref document:20080703

Kind code of ref document:P

RIN2Information on inventor provided after grant (corrected)

Inventor name:STEPHENS, GEORGE

Inventor name:STELL, RICHARD,C.

Inventor name:DINICOLANTONIO, ARTHUR, R.

Inventor name:BANCROFT, JENNIFER, L.

REGReference to a national code

Ref country code:IE

Ref legal event code:FG4D

PG25Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:SI

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20080521

PG25Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:FI

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20080521

Ref country code:ES

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20080901

PG25Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:AT

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20080521

PG25Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:DK

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20080521

Ref country code:CZ

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20080521

Ref country code:SE

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20080821

Ref country code:MC

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date:20080630

Ref country code:PT

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20081021

REGReference to a national code

Ref country code:CH

Ref legal event code:PL

PG25Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:RO

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20080521

Ref country code:SK

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20080521

PLBENo opposition filed within time limit

Free format text:ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAAInformation on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text:STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26NNo opposition filed

Effective date:20090224

PG25Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:IE

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date:20080627

Ref country code:EE

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20080521

Ref country code:BG

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20080821

PG25Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:LI

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date:20080630

Ref country code:CH

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date:20080630

PG25Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:CY

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20080521

Ref country code:LU

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date:20080627

Ref country code:HU

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20081122

PG25Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:TR

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20080521

PG25Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:GR

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date:20080822

PGFPAnnual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:GB

Payment date:20140527

Year of fee payment:12

PGFPAnnual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:IT

Payment date:20140625

Year of fee payment:12

PGFPAnnual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:BE

Payment date:20140527

Year of fee payment:12

PGFPAnnual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:DE

Payment date:20140630

Year of fee payment:12

Ref country code:NL

Payment date:20140610

Year of fee payment:12

REGReference to a national code

Ref country code:DE

Ref legal event code:R119

Ref document number:60321239

Country of ref document:DE

PG25Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:IT

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date:20150627

GBPCGb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date:20150627

REGReference to a national code

Ref country code:NL

Ref legal event code:MM

Effective date:20150701

PG25Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:NL

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date:20150701

Ref country code:DE

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date:20160101

Ref country code:GB

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date:20150627

REGReference to a national code

Ref country code:FR

Ref legal event code:PLFP

Year of fee payment:14

REGReference to a national code

Ref country code:FR

Ref legal event code:PLFP

Year of fee payment:15

PG25Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:BE

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date:20150630

REGReference to a national code

Ref country code:FR

Ref legal event code:PLFP

Year of fee payment:16

PGFPAnnual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:FR

Payment date:20200520

Year of fee payment:18

PG25Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code:FR

Free format text:LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date:20210630


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp