Detailed Description
It is to be understood that the following detailed description is exemplary and is intended to provide further explanation of the invention as claimed. Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs.
It is noted that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of exemplary embodiments according to the invention. As used herein, the singular forms "a", "an" and "the" are intended to include the plural forms as well, and it should be understood that when the terms "comprises" and/or "comprising" are used in this specification, they specify the presence of stated features, steps, operations, devices, components, and/or combinations thereof, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
Interpretation of terms
poly-T: in this document, a nucleotide sequence in which a plurality of thymines are linked to each other at the end of a damaged DNA is shown, and the poly-T single strand, the poly-T sequence, the thymine-rich single strand and the like in this document are referred to as the same meaning;
a-rich probe: or poly-A signal probe, represents a single nucleotide strand having multiple adenine bases;
AP probe: in the present document, the AP probe is an a-rich probe containing an endonuclease recognition site, and the AP site is an abasic site in a DNA double strand;
AP site: represents a site free of base in the double strand of DNA for recognition by an endonuclease;
TdT: terminal transferase, or terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (a DNA polymerase that is template independent, capable of catalyzing the binding of deoxynucleotides to the 3' -OH end of a DNA molecule;
ddATP: dideoxy adenosine triphosphate;
APE1 enzyme: an endonuclease;
dTTPs: deoxynucleotide triphosphate of thymine;
rSAP: shrimp alkaline phosphatase;
conversion of AMP-ATP-AMP: in the firefly luminescence reaction, ATP + fluorescein + O2AMP + oxyfluorescein + PPi + light; released AMPs can be converted to ATPs by a combination of enzymatic reactions of Adenylate Kinase (AK) and Pyruvate Kinase (PK) in the presence of phosphoenolpyruvate monosodium salt hydrate (PEP) and dCTP, and the conversion of ATPs to AMPs with the aid of firefly luciferase and luciferin generates a strong bioluminescent signal;
AMP: adenosine phosphate;
AP Probe/poly-T double-stranded DNA: represents a double strand formed by hybridization of an AP probe strand and poly-T;
UDG: uracil DNA glycosylase, which is used for identifying uracil base modification in the sequence and shearing the uracil base modification;
aggregated DNA damage: clustered damage, aggregated DNA damage "means that the DNA damage sites are tightly distributed within one or two helices of DNA.
As introduced in the background art, the DNA damage detection method in the prior art usually needs more biomarker and washing separation processes, and in order to solve the technical problems, the invention provides a label-free and homogeneous bioluminescence method for detecting DNA damage in a genome based on a Base Excision Repair (BER) pathway and template-free isothermal cycle amplification started by terminal transferase (TdT).
In a first aspect of the present invention, a label-free, homogeneous bioluminescent DNA damage detection method is provided, which comprises: blocking all 3' -OH tail ends in a genome to be detected, identifying and cutting damaged DNA parts of the genome to be detected through DNA glycosylase to expose new 3' -OH tail ends, constructing an adenine (A) -rich hybrid chain at the new 3' -OH tail ends, adding exonuclease to cut adenine (A) -rich single chains in the hybrid chain to generate adenine single bases so as to generate adenine ribonucleotide (AMP) molecules, catalyzing fluorescein to realize bioluminescence, and detecting the strength of damaged DNA through detecting light signals.
In a preferred embodiment of the first aspect, the 3' -OH is blocked by adding dideoxy adenosine triphosphate (ddATP) to the sample to be detected.
Further, the dideoxy adenosine triphosphate (ddATP) labels the 3' -OH terminus catalyzed by terminal transferase (TdT).
In some embodiments of the above preferred embodiments, in order to avoid the influence of the excess ddATP on the subsequent reaction, the blocking reaction further comprises adding shrimp alkaline phosphatase (rSAP) to the system after the reaction for hydrolyzing the excess ddATP.
It is well known in the art that glycosylases specifically recognize the type of damage in a DNA strand and cleave it leaving a vacancy in the original DNA strand, with the cleaved portion exposing the 3' -OH terminus. In order to ensure that the damaged DNA base can be cut by the glycosylase to expose 3' -OH after the glycosylase recognizes the damaged DNA base, in a preferred embodiment of the invention, an endonuclease (APE1) is added to recognize and cut the damaged site together with the glycosylase.
Since the type of DNA damage in the genome to be tested is unknown in most cases, in order to determine the type of DNA damage, a person skilled in the art can divide the sample to be tested into multiple parts, and add different types of glycosylases and subsequent reagents to the multiple parts respectively to determine the type of DNA damage in the genome to be tested.
Preferably, the adenine (A) and thymine (T) rich hybrid is constructed as follows: deoxynucleotide triphosphate of thymine is added to the 3' -OH end of the damaged DNA by terminal transferase catalysis to form a thymine (T) -rich DNA single strand, and an adenine (A) -rich probe is correspondingly added, so that the thymine (T) -rich DNA single strand and the adenine (A) -rich probe are hybridized to form a hybridized strand rich in adenine (A) and thymine (T).
Further, the 5' end of the probe rich in adenine (A) has phosphate group modification.
Preferably, the exonuclease used in the present invention should be capable of cleaving the a-rich strand in the hybrid strand and obtaining adenine single base to achieve bioluminescence, so that the exonuclease capable of achieving the cleavage effect can be used in the detection method of the present invention, and in a specific example, the exonuclease is Lambda exonuclease. The Lambda exonuclease cleaves the A-rich single strand of the hybrid strand into single bases, while the remaining T-rich single strand can continue to bind to the probe to initiate the next cycle.
In a specific implementation manner of the above preferred technical solution, the detection method is as follows: all 3' -OH in the genomic DNA is blocked by catalyzing ddATP through TdT, and rSAP is added to stop the reaction; DNA glycosylase cleaves the damaged base to generate a new 3' -OH terminus; then, repeatedly adding dTTPs into the 3' -OH tail end of the damaged DNA under the catalysis of TdT to generate rich poly-T structure single chains, and adding an A-rich signal probe for hybridization to form a hybrid chain; the hybrid chains are hydrolyzed by Lambda exonuclease to produce a large number of AMP molecules, which are converted to AMP-ATP-AMP with the aid of firefly luciferase and luciferin, resulting in bioluminescence.
In another preferred embodiment of the first aspect, in order to further improve the detection sensitivity, the present invention further provides a detection method for amplifying the detection signal by endonuclease (APE1) -induced cyclic cleavage, wherein the detection method for the ap 1-induced cyclic cleavage is as follows: the method comprises the steps of closing the 3' -OH end in a genome to be detected, adding glycosylase to cut damaged bases and generate new 3' -OH, expanding a single chain rich in T bases at the new 3' -OH end, hybridizing the single chain with an AP probe containing a poly-A sequence and an AP site to form a double chain, recognizing the AP site by APE1 enzyme and catalyzing the hybrid double chain to be circularly cracked, releasing a new 3' -OH sequence, and repeatedly amplifying the 3' -OH end of the newly released primer sequence to form a hybrid double chain rich in adenine and thymine so as to realize signal amplification again.
Further, in the above embodiment, the AP site is at least one abasic site; in a specific example, the AP probe contains a poly-A sequence and two abasic sites (AP sites) of the AP probe, whose 3' end is NH-bonded2Modified to prevent non-specific amplification.
In a specific embodiment, the steps of the detection method for the amplification of the APE 1-induced cyclic cleavage signal are as follows: ddATP was introduced via TdT catalysis, blocking all free 3' -OH ends; subsequently, glycosylase is added to recognize and cleave the damaged base to generate a new 3' -OH; the cleaved damaged DNA initiates TdT-catalyzed amplification to produce a poly-T single strand; the AP probe is hybridized with a poly-T single strand to form an AP probe/poly-T double-stranded DNA, and then APE1 enzyme starts the cycle cleavage of the double-stranded DNA to release a large amount of 3' -OH primers; TdT catalyzes dTTPs to be repeatedly added to the 3' -OH end of the newly generated primer to form a long-chain poly-T sequence; the generated poly-T is hybridized with a poly-A signal probe to form a poly-T/signal probe double chain; the signaling probe in the duplex is specifically degraded by Lambda exonuclease from its 5' -phosphorylated end to release a large amount of AMPs, and the remaining poly-T sequence can hybridize with the new signaling probe to form a new poly-T/signaling probe duplex, initiating cyclic cleavage of the signaling probe and the release of more and more AMPs.
In a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided a kit for DNA damage detection, comprising at least adenine dideoxynucleotides (ddATPs), deoxynucleotides triphosphate of thymine (dTTPs), fluorescein, terminal transferase (TdT), shrimp alkaline phosphatase, DNA glycosylase, Lambda exonuclease, luciferase, Adenylate Kinase (AK) and Pyruvate Kinase (PK).
Preferably, the kit further comprises an endonuclease (APE1) and an AP probe.
In a third aspect of the present invention, there is provided the use of the label-free, homogeneous bioluminescent DNA damage detection method of the first aspect or the DNA damage detection kit of the second aspect in the fields of disease diagnosis, screening of anti-tumor active ingredients, and the like.
In the above application fields, the applications in the disease diagnosis field include the diagnosis of DNA damage-related diseases such as tumors, neurodegenerative diseases or other DNA damage-related diseases, and specific examples of the other DNA damage-related diseases include xeroderma pigmentosum, warfarin syndrome, huntington's disease, and the like.
The detection methods provided by the present invention can be applied to diseases that have DNA damage or modification as a diagnostic criterion, either now or as may be disclosed in the future.
In addition, as is known in the art, the tumor cells have strong capability of repairing damaged DNA, and the capability of inhibiting the tumor cells from repairing DNA damage is also an antitumor drug development idea, so that the DNA damage detection method provided by the invention can also be used for evaluating antitumor active ingredients.
In order to make the technical solutions of the present invention more clearly understood by those skilled in the art, the technical solutions of the present invention will be described in detail below with reference to specific embodiments.
1. Feasibility experiment of detecting DNA damage by bioluminescence method.
In this example, the feasibility of the method was verified using uracil bases (U) in DNA as targets (fig. 3). Uracil is a common DNA damage that causes cytosine deamination and, in the event of dUTP misinterpretation, a mutagenic U/G mismatch or genotoxic U/A pair. The blocking effect of ddATP on 3' -OH was first verified by gel electrophoresis (FIG. 1). In the presence of ddATP and rSAP, only a 39bp band was observed in normal DNA (FIG. 3A, lane 1) or U-damaged DNA (FIG. 3A, lane 2), and no amplified band was detected, since dsDNA first underwent a TDT-mediated ddATP labeling reaction, and then rSAP removed free excess ddATP. The dsDNAs are blocked by ddATP when TDT catalyzes repeated extension of dTTPs to the 3' -OH terminus of the DNA. Thus, neither normal DNA (FIG. 3A, lane 1) nor damaged DNA (FIG. 3A, lane 2) form an amplified band of poly-T structure catalyzed by TdT, at the same position as the untreated double-stranded DNA (FIG. 3A,lane 5 and lane 6). In contrast, in the absence of ddATP and rSAP, large bands of more than 500bp were observed for both normal DNA (FIG. 3A, lane 3) and U-damaged DNA (FIG. 3A, lane 4), indicating that TdT-catalyzed template-free isothermal amplification produced large molecular weight DNA fragments. These results indicate that ddATP can effectively block the 3' -OH end of dsDNA.
To verify whether DNA glycosylase can remove damaged DNA bases, the present invention measures the melting curves of normal and damaged double-stranded DNA (FIG. 3B). UDG can specifically recognize and excise uracil by catalyzing the cleavage of N-glycosidic bonds between uracil and the DNA backbone, releasing damaged bases and creating AP sites. APE1 cleaves the phosphodiester backbone at the AP site, yielding a backbone with 3'-OH and 5' -PO4The DNA single strand of (1) is broken. After UDG and APE1 treatment, the melting temperature of normal dsDNA was 78 ℃ (fig. 3B) and that of damaged DNA was 65 ℃ (fig. 3B). The Tm of damaged dsDNA is much lower than that of normal dsDNA. The decrease in melt temperature indicates that the DNA glycosylase breaks the phosphodiester bond of the damaged single strand at the U-damaged DNA, forming a new 3' -OH terminus.
This example further uses gel electrophoresis to verify TDT-catalyzed template-free isothermal amplification after DNA glycosylase cleavage (fig. 3C). Only a 39bp band was observed for normal DNA (FIG. 3C, lane 1), indicating that ddATP blocked the 3' -OH end of the double-stranded DNA and no amplification occurred. In contrast, in the presence of U-damaged DNA, a distinct amplification band appeared, indicating the formation of a new 3' -OH terminus induced by DNA glycosylase and a poly-T structure catalyzed by TDT (FIG. 3C, lane 2). This result clearly shows that only damaged DNA can form poly-T structure under the catalysis of TdT.
Finally, bioluminescence measurements were performed in this example to monitor the cleavage product AMP produced by Lambda exonuclease digestion (FIG. 3D). In the control group, no bioluminescent signal was detected due to lack of AMP production, demonstrating DNA damage (fig. 3D). In contrast, enhanced bioluminescent signals were observed in the presence of U-damaged DNA (fig. 3D), suggesting that only U-damaged DNA can induce Lambda exonuclease digestion mediated release of AMP, producing a significant bioluminescent signal through conversion of AMP to ATP.
2. Different numbers and locations of DNA damage were studied.
This example designs a damaged DNA containing 1 uracil base, i.e., U-damaged DNA and two damaged DNAs containing 2 uracil bases, i.e., U-6 damaged DNA and U-17 damaged DNA, with the U-6 damaged DNA having a 6bp spacing between the two uracil bases (i.e., aggregated DNA damage) and the U-17 damaged DNA having a 17bp spacing between the two uracil bases (i.e., single base DNA damage). Notably, aggregated DNA lesions are typically tightly distributed within one or two helices of DNA by two or more lesions, whereas in single base DNA lesions, the two lesions are relatively distant. In the absence of the injury site, no bioluminescent signal was detected (fig. 4). In contrast, intense bioluminescent signals were observed in the presence of 1 damaged base of DNA (fig. 4), aggregated damaged bases (fig. 4) and single base damaged bases (fig. 4). Regardless of the position of the two damaged bases, the bioluminescent signal of dsDNA containing two damaged sites is much higher than that of dsDNA containing only one damaged site, and the bioluminescent signal of U-6 damaged DNA is the same as that of U-17 damaged DNA. These results indicate that the method can distinguish dsDNA containing different numbers of lesions, and that aggregate lesions that are difficult to detect with conventional methods can also be accurately detected.
Notably, most reported BER-based damaged base detection methods rely on templates, which can only detect single-base DNA damage and cannot detect aggregated DNA damage, because the position of the 2 bases of the aggregated damage is within 1 helix, and the broken double-stranded DNA may produce unstable single-stranded DNA after excision repair, which prevents the DNA polymerase from labeling the aggregated damage site in a template-dependent manner. TdT recognizes and captures the very short 3' terminal oligonucleotide (only about 4 nucleotides) that is generated during the process of DNA glycosylase removing damaged bases from aggregated damaged DNA, and the method of this example detects single base damage and aggregation damage due to the introduction of TdT. The obtained single-stranded DNA forms a poly-T structure in a template-free mode under the catalysis of TdT, and then is paired with a rA-containing signal probe to form a double strand. Addition of Lambda exonuclease can hydrolyze the signaling probe in the duplex, releasing abundant AMP to initiate pyrophosphoryl-ATP pyrophosphorylation of cyclic AMP to produce enhanced bioluminescent signal.
TABLE 1 DNA sequences used in this example
Note: underlined bold U indicates uracil deoxyribonucleotides, and underlined bold G indicates 8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG) deoxyribonucleotides. Underlined bold letters "X" indicate AP sites. rA in the signaling probe represents adenine nucleotide.
3. And detecting the selectivity.
8-oxo-7, 8-dihydroguanine (8-oxoG) is the most prominent oxidized base adduct produced by oxidation of the guanine (G) heterocycle by Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS), and Fpg, a bifunctional DNA glycosylase, removes 8-oxo groups, cleaves the DNA backbone, forming mononucleotide gaps. This example designs a DNA probe containing an 8-oxoG base at 21 bases on the 5' end (8-oxoG damaged DNA) as a substrate for Fpg. The selectivity of the method was analyzed with two DNA lesions (U-lesion DNA and 8-oxoG-lesion DNA) and two DNA glycosylases (UDG and FPG). As shown in FIG. 5, U-damaged DNA (FIG. 5, red bars) produced a bioluminescent signal when UDG and APE1 were used as DNA glycosylases, whereas 8-oxoG-damaged DNA (FIG. 5) produced no significant bioluminescent signal. When FPG and APE1 were used as DNA glycosylases, 8-oxoG damaged DNA (FIG. 5) produced a high bioluminescent signal, whereas U damaged DNA (FIG. 5) produced no significant bioluminescent signal. The result shows that the method has good selectivity on specific DNA damage, and different DNA damages can be specifically detected by combining different DNA glycosylases.
4. And (3) detection sensitivity.
To evaluate the sensitivity of the method, this example measured the bioluminescent signals generated by different concentrations of U-6 damaged DNA under optimal conditions. As shown in FIG. 6A, the bioluminescent signal increased with increasing U-6 damage DNA concentration and time and reached a maximum within 25 minutes. When the concentration of U-6 damaged DNA is from 1.0X 10-9Increase to 1.0X 10-7At mol/L, the bioluminescence signal also increased (FIG. 6B). In a logarithmic coordinate system, the concentration of bioluminescence signals and damaged DNA is 1.0 × 10-9~1.0×10-7Linear correlation in the mol/L range (FIG. 6C), and regression equation B of 31976.75log10C+294865.51(R20.9878), wherein C represents the concentration of damaged DNA (mol/L) and B represents the bioluminescence intensity. Calculated according to the principle of adding 3 times of standard deviation to the control group signal, the detection limit is 8.26 multiplied by 10-10mol/L。
5. Improved method sensitivity analysis
To verify the sensitivity of the improved method, this example measured the bioluminescent signal generated by different concentrations of damaged DNA (U-6 damaged DNA) under optimal conditions. When the concentration of U-6 damaged DNA is from 1.0X 10-13Increase to 1.0X 10-8At mol/L, the bioluminescence increased and plateaus within 25min (FIGS. 7A and 7B). In logarithmic scale, the bioluminescence signal is at 1.0X 10-13To 1.0X 10-8The mol/L range is linearly related to the concentration of U-6 damaged DNA (FIG. 7C). The regression equation is B-19734.53 log10C+276062.34(R20.9900), wherein C represents the concentration of damaged DNA (mol/L) and B represents the bioluminescence intensity. Detection limit of 3.26 × 10-14mol/L. The improved method has sensitivity which is improved by 3 orders of magnitude compared with the original method (figure 6C); labeling of non-natural nucleoside analogs (1X 10)-10mol/L) and high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (1X 10)-10mol/L) is improved by 4 orders of magnitude; than aptamer-based fluorescence (3X 10)-9mol/L) is 5 orders of magnitude higher. To investigate the feasibility of this improved method for the detection of uracil in the mixtures, U-6 damaged DNA was mixed with normal DNA in different proportions and the uracil content of the artificial mixtures was determined. The measured U-6 damaged DNA level (Y) is well linear with the input U-6 damaged DNA level (X) (FIG. 7D). The regression equation is Y-0.9831X +0.0402 (R)20.9993). It is noteworthy that this improved method can even distinguish uracil as low as 0.001% in the mixture, superior to the highly specific co-amplification low temperature PCR reaction (COLD-PCR) method of spiking (0.01%), comparable to the single molecule counting method (0.001%).
6. Detection of cellular genomic DNA damage
To demonstrate the feasibility of the improved method to detect DNA damage in authentic biological samples, this example measured uracil base levels in the genomes of tumor cells and normal cells. The tumor cells comprise a human lung adenocarcinoma cell line (A549 cells) and a human cervical cancer cell line (HeLa cells), and the normal cells comprise a human embryonic kidney cell line (HEK-293 cells) and a human embryonic lung fibroblast cell line (MRC-5 cells). This example extracts all cellular genomic DNA using a QIAamp DNA minikit (Qiagen, Germany) and measures the concentration of genomic DNA (ng/. mu.L) using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, USA). Higher levels of genomic uracil were measured in cancer cells HeLa cells (FIG. 8A) and A549 cells (FIG. 8A) compared to normal cells including HEK-293 cells (FIG. 8A) and MRC-5 cells (FIG. 8A), consistent with the literature-reported results of the LC-MS/MS method. This example further uses HeLa cell genomic DNA asModel, the relationship between bioluminescence signal and DNA quality was studied. As shown in FIG. 8B, the bioluminescence signal increased as the genomic DNA content increased from 0.05 to 200ng, with a regression equation of B-24657.92 log10 N+58484.54(R20.9951), where N represents genomic DNA content (ng) and B represents bioluminescence intensity. The detection limit was calculated to be 0.011 ng. The result shows that the improved method can be used for uracil whole genome analysis and has higher accuracy and reliability.
Example 1
(1) Preparation of double-stranded DNA substrates
mu.M oligonucleotides which hybridize to each other are added to an annealing buffer (50mM NaCl,10mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0), incubated at 95 ℃ for 5 minutes and then slowly cooled to room temperature to form a double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) structure. The annealed dsDNA substrates were diluted to different concentrations with annealing buffer solution. All dsDNA substrates obtained were stored at 4 ℃ for later use in experiments.
(2) Isothermal signal amplification reaction
The isothermal signal amplification reaction process comprises four sequential steps. In the first step, dsDNA of different concentrations, 30. mu.M ddATP, 16U TdT, 0.25mM CoCl2And 1 XTdT buffer (50mM potassium acetate, 20mM Tris-acetate, 10mM magnesium acetate, pH 7.9) in a total volume of 10. mu.L, and incubated at 37 ℃ for 2 hours followed by incubation at 75 ℃ for 20 minutes to inactivate the TdT. In the second step, 0.3U rSAP, 1U UDG, 0.1U APE1 and 1 XTdT buffer were mixed and added to the reaction system to make a total volume of 15. mu.L. And the mixed solution was incubated at 37 ℃ for 60 minutes and then reacted at 95 ℃ for 10 minutes. The third step, consisting of 1.5. mu.L of 100mM dTTP, 6U TdT, 0.25mM CoCl2The reaction solution, 1 XTDT buffer and the product of the previous step, which had a total volume of 20. mu.L, was reacted at 37 ℃ for 60 minutes to generate a ploy T structure, and then heated at 95 ℃ for 20 minutes to terminate the reaction. In the last step,200nM signal probe 2, 2U Lambda exonuclease and 1 × Lambda exonuclease reaction buffer (6.7mM Glycine-KOH, 0.25mM MgCl. sub.25. mu.g/ml BSA, pH 9.4) were added to the solution to a total volume of 50. mu.L. Subsequently mixing the mixtureIncubate at 37 ℃ for 30 minutes to generate large amounts of AMP.
(3) The improved method comprises the following steps
In the first step, dsDNA of different concentrations, 30. mu.M ddATP, 16U TdT, 0.25mM CoCl2And 1 XTdT buffer in a total volume of 10. mu.L were mixed and incubated at 37 ℃ for 2 hours followed by incubation at 75 ℃ for 20 minutes to inactivate the TdT. In the second step, 0.3U rSAP, 1U UDG, 0.1U APE1 and 1 XTdT buffer were mixed and added to the reaction system to make thetotal volume 15. mu.L, and the mixed solution was incubated at 37 ℃ for 60min and then reacted at 95 ℃ for 10 min. Third, 1.5. mu.L of 100mM dTTP, 6U TdT, 0.25mM CoCl21 XTdT buffer and 20. mu.L of the reaction solution of the reaction product of the previous step were reacted at 37 ℃ for 60 minutes to generate a ploy T structure, and then reacted at 95 ℃ for 20 minutes to terminate the reaction. Next, 0.5. mu.L of 10. mu.M AP probe, 2U of APE1 and 1 XTdT buffer were added to the reaction system so that the total volume was 25. mu.L, and reacted at 37 ℃ for 40 minutes, resulting in a large amount of 3' -OH ends. To generate more poly T structure, 6U of TdT, 1. mu.L of 100mM dTTP and 1 XTDT buffer were added again to a volume of 30. mu.L, reacted at 37 ℃ for 60 minutes, and then reacted at 95 ℃ for 20 minutes to terminate the reaction. In the last step,200nM signal probe 2, 2U Lambda exonuclease and 1 × Lambda exonuclease reaction buffer were added to the solution to a total volume of 50 μ L. The mixture was then incubated at 37 ℃ for 30 minutes to generate large amounts of AMP.
(4) Bioluminescence measurement and data analysis
The reaction solution containing AMP was transferred to an ATP detection system and mixed, and then a bioluminescent signal was monitored in real time at room temperature using a Glomax bio/chemiluminescence detector. The ATP detection System consisted of 4.0. mu.L AMP-ATP conversion buffer (1.0. mu.L 1U/. mu.L AK, 1.0. mu.L 1U/. mu.L PK, 1.0. mu.L 10mM dCTP and 1.0. mu.L 4.8mM PEP) and 6.0. mu.L ATP detection buffer (0.5mM D-luciferin, 1.25. mu.g/mL firefly luciferase, 10mg/mL BSA, 500mM Tricine buffer (pH 7.8),100mM MgSO 242mM EDTA, 100mM DTT). The parameter settings of the instrument are respectively: integration time was 1s and the number of runs was 25. And selectThe maximum of the 25 measurements was used as bioluminescent signal for subsequent data analysis.
(5) Gel electrophoresis measurement
The TDT-mediated DNA amplification product was stained by SYBR Gold and electrophoresed in 1 XTBE buffer (44.5mM Tris-boric acid, 1mM EDTA, pH 8.2) for 45 minutes on 12% native polyacrylamide gel at a constant pressure of 110V at room temperature. Finally the gel was visualized using a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc MP imaging system.
(6) Fluorescence measurement
After the TdT-mediated DNA amplification product was stained with SYBR Gold, the fluorescence signal of the reaction product was measured using an F-7000 fluorescence spectrophotometer from Hitachi, Japan, using a xenon lamp as an excitation light source. The excitation wavelength is 488nm, and the spectrum recording range is 500-700 nm. Both excitation and emission slits were 5.0 nm. The fluorescence intensity at 540nm (maximum emission wavelength of SYBR Gold) was used for subsequent data analysis.
(7) Measurement of melt chain temperature
100nM damaged dsDNA and 100nM normal dsDNA were incubated with UDG and APE1 for 1h at 37 ℃. After the reaction, the sample was stained with SYBR Green I, and the fluorescence value was measured every 30 seconds at a temperature of 55 ℃ to 95 ℃ using a Bio-Rad real-time fluorescence detection system. The temperature of the melting chain is the corresponding temperature value when-dF/dT reaches the maximum value. (wherein F is fluorescence intensity and T is temperature).
(8) Cell culture and extraction of genomic DNA
Human cervical cancer cell lines (HeLa cells), human lung adenocarcinoma cell lines (A549 cells), human embryonic kidney cell lines (HEK-293 cells), and normal human lung cell lines (MRC-5 cells) were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) containing 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin mixture. All cells contained 5% CO at 37 deg.C2Culturing in a humid incubator. During exponential growth phase, cells were harvested and intracellular DNA was extracted using the QIAamp DNA Mini kit according to the instructions and the concentration of extracted DNA (ng/, L) was determined with a ultramicro uv spectrophotometer.
(9) Principle of bioluminescence method for detecting DNA Damage (FIG. 1)
The scheme comprises four parts: (1) the TdT-mediated ddATP labeling reaction is used for blocking the 3 '-hydroxyl (3' -OH) end of DNA, (2) DNA glycosylase is used for catalyzing and removing DNA damage, (3) TdT-mediated template-free amplification is used for forming a poly-T structure, and (4) AMP is generated and bioluminescence reaction is carried out. The whole reaction system consists of ddATP, TdT, rSAP, DNA glycosylase, a signal probe and Lambda exonuclease. ddATP is first labeled on the DNA with the aid of TdT polymerase to block the initial 3'-OH terminus to prevent the effect of the initial 3' -OH terminus on subsequent reactions. Shrimp alkaline phosphatase (rSAP) was added to remove excess ddATP, avoiding excess ddATP affecting subsequent reactions. Then, DNA damage in the genome is removed by the action of DNA glycosylase and APE1, and a new 3' -OH site is generated. Multiple dTTPs were then incorporated into the newly generated 3' -OH sites by template-free amplification of the TdT to form a poly-T sequence. This example designs a signaling probe modified at the 5 'end with a phosphate group (5' -dRP) and containing multiple adenine ribonucleotides in the middle. The signal probe can be completely hybridized with the generated poly T sequence to form a double-stranded structure of the poly-T/signal probe. The signal probe is gradually degraded from 5' -dRP to release a large amount of AMP under the catalysis of Lambda exonuclease. This is because Lambda exonuclease can specifically digest a single strand in a double-stranded structure from the 5' -phosphorylated (5' -dRP) end, but has extremely low catalytic efficiency even for a sequence without the 5' -dRP end. The resulting AMP is converted to ATP by the enzymatic reaction of Adenylate Kinase (AK) and Pyruvate Kinase (PK) in the presence of PEP and dCTP, and subsequently ATP is converted to AMP with the aid of luciferase and luciferin and produces a strong bioluminescent signal. Notably, AMP can be converted to ATP through a new cycle, which can generate an amplified bioluminescent signal. If there is no damage in the genomic DNA, no new 3' -OH sites are generated under the catalysis of DNA glycosylase, and no obvious bioluminescent signal is generated.
(10) Improved DNA Damage detection method (FIG. 2)
This example further incorporates the APE 1-induced cyclic cleavage signal amplification technique to improve detection sensitivity. This example designed a DNA sequence containing a poly-A sequence and two alkali-free nucleotidesAP Probe for a base site (AP site) whose 3' terminal is NH-substituted2Modified to prevent non-specific amplification (FIG. 2). ddATP was introduced via TDT catalysis, blocking all U-damaged DNA with free 3' -OH ends (FIG. 2), and then rSAP was added, stopping the blocking reaction by hydrolysis of the remaining ddATP. Subsequently, UDG and APE1 were added to remove uracil bases to generate new 3' -OH. The cleaved U-damaged DNA (FIG. 2) can be used as a primer to initiate TDT catalyzed template-free isothermal amplification, which results in the generation of a poly-T structure. The AP probe (FIG. 2) can hybridize to a poly-T structure to form an AP probe/poly-T double-stranded DNA (FIG. 2), followed by the APE1 enzyme initiating the cyclic cleavage of the double-stranded DNA, releasing a large amount of 3' -OH primer. TDT catalyzes repeated addition of dTTPs to the 3' -OH end of the newly generated primer to form a long poly-T sequence (FIG. 2). The resulting poly-T can hybridize to a poly-A signaling probe to form a poly-T/signaling probe duplex (FIG. 2). The signaling probe in the duplex can be specifically degraded by Lambda exonuclease from its 5' -phosphorylated end to release a large amount of AMPs, and the remaining poly-T sequence can hybridize with a new signaling probe to form a new poly-T/signaling probe duplex, initiating cyclic cleavage of the signaling probe and release of more and more AMPs. Released AMPs can be converted to ATPs by a combination of enzymatic reactions of Adenylate Kinase (AK) and Pyruvate Kinase (PK) in the presence of phosphoenolpyruvate monosodium salt hydrate (PEP) and dCTP, and the conversion of ATPs to AMPs with the aid of firefly luciferase and luciferin produces a strong bioluminescent signal. Compared with the previous method, the improved method can generate additional 3' -OH due to the introduction of the AP probe, and the newly generated primer can generate more poly-T sequences under the catalysis of TDT, form more poly-T/signal probe double-stranded structures and generate more AMP molecules to generate enhanced bioluminescent signals.
The above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention and is not intended to limit the present invention, and various modifications and changes may be made by those skilled in the art. Any modification, equivalent replacement, or improvement made within the spirit and principle of the present invention should be included in the protection scope of the present invention.
SEQUENCE LISTING
<110> Qingdao university of science and technology
<120> a label-free homogeneous phase bioluminescence DNA damage detection method
<130> 2010
<160> 10
<170> PatentIn version 3.3
<210> 1
<211> 39
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial sequence
<400> 1
cttgtggtag ttggagctgg tggcgtaggc aagagtggc 39
<210> 2
<211> 39
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial sequence
<400> 2
gaacaccatc aacctcgacc accgcatccg ttctcacgg 39
<210> 3
<211> 39
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial sequence
<400> 3
cttgtggtag ttggagctgg uggcgtaggc aagagtggc 39
<210> 4
<211> 39
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial sequence
<400> 4
gaacaccatc aacctcgacc accgcatccg ttctcacgg 39
<210> 5
<211> 39
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial sequence
<400> 5
cttgtggtag utggagcugg tggcgtaggc aagagtgcc 39
<210> 6
<211> 39
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial sequence
<400> 6
gaacaccatc aacctcgacc accgcatccg ttctcacgg 39
<210> 7
<211> 39
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial sequence
<400> 7
cttgtggtag utggagctgg tggcgtaguc aagagtgcc 39
<210> 8
<211> 39
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial sequence
<400> 8
gaacaccatc aacctcgacc accgcatccg ttctcacgg 39
<210> 9
<211> 39
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial sequence
<400> 9
cttgtggtag ttggagctgg tggcgtaggc aagagtgtc 39
<210> 10
<211> 24
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial sequence
<400> 10
aaaaaaaaxaa aaaaaaxaaaa aaaa-NH2 24