Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


CN112180893A - Construction and application of fault-related distributed orthogonal neighborhood preserving embedded model in CSTR (continuous stirred tank reactor) process - Google Patents

Construction and application of fault-related distributed orthogonal neighborhood preserving embedded model in CSTR (continuous stirred tank reactor) process
Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN112180893A
CN112180893ACN202010969145.8ACN202010969145ACN112180893ACN 112180893 ACN112180893 ACN 112180893ACN 202010969145 ACN202010969145 ACN 202010969145ACN 112180893 ACN112180893 ACN 112180893A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
sub
fault
newi
block
spe
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN202010969145.8A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN112180893B (en
Inventor
王妍
王延峰
李勃毅
顾晓光
凌丹
孙军伟
王英聪
朱传迁
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Zhengzhou University of Light Industry
Original Assignee
Zhengzhou University of Light Industry
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Zhengzhou University of Light IndustryfiledCriticalZhengzhou University of Light Industry
Priority to CN202010969145.8ApriorityCriticalpatent/CN112180893B/en
Publication of CN112180893ApublicationCriticalpatent/CN112180893A/en
Application grantedgrantedCritical
Publication of CN112180893BpublicationCriticalpatent/CN112180893B/en
Activelegal-statusCriticalCurrent
Anticipated expirationlegal-statusCritical

Links

Images

Classifications

Landscapes

Abstract

Translated fromChinese

本发明公开了一种CSTR过程中故障相关分布式正交邻域保持嵌入模型的构建方法,包括:获取CSTR过程中m个物理量监测点监测的物理量的n个历史正常样本,应用信噪比算法挑选出与每个故障相关的变量,构成B+1个子块[X1,…,XB+1],计算每个子块历史正常样本

Figure DDA0002683442550000011
的统计量
Figure DDA0002683442550000012
和统计量SPEb,i(i=1,…,n)及其控制限
Figure DDA0002683442550000013
SPEb,lim;在线采集CSTR过程中m个物理量监测点的物理量数据,把数据对应到B+1个子块内,计算每一个子块Xb,new的第i(i=1,2,…,n1)个测量样本的xb,newi统计量
Figure DDA0002683442550000014
统计量SPEb,newi;采用贝叶斯推理构造统计量
Figure DDA0002683442550000015
Figure DDA0002683442550000016
统计量
Figure DDA0002683442550000017
超出其控制限时表示有故障发生。该方法考虑了CSTR过程数据的局部信息,建立分布式监控模型,提高了故障的检测率。

Figure 202010969145

The invention discloses a method for constructing a fault-related distributed orthogonal neighborhood maintenance embedded model in a CSTR process, comprising: acquiring n historical normal samples of physical quantities monitored by m physical quantity monitoring points in the CSTR process, and applying a signal-to-noise ratio algorithm Select the variables related to each fault, form B+1 sub-blocks [X1 ,...,XB+1 ], and calculate the historical normal samples of each sub-block

Figure DDA0002683442550000011
statistic
Figure DDA0002683442550000012
and statistic SPEb,i (i=1,...,n) and its control limits
Figure DDA0002683442550000013
SPEb,lim ; collect the physical quantity data of m physical quantity monitoring points in the CSTR process, map the data to B+1 sub-blocks, and calculate the i-th (i=1,2,… ,n1) xb,newi statistics of measurement samples
Figure DDA0002683442550000014
Statistics SPEb,newi ; statistics are constructed using Bayesian inference
Figure DDA0002683442550000015
and
Figure DDA0002683442550000016
Statistics
Figure DDA0002683442550000017
Exceeding its control limit indicates a fault. The method considers the local information of the CSTR process data, establishes a distributed monitoring model, and improves the detection rate of faults.

Figure 202010969145

Description

Construction and application of fault-related distributed orthogonal neighborhood preserving embedded model in CSTR (continuous stirred tank reactor) process
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of fault monitoring in a chemical production process, and particularly relates to construction and application of a fault-related distributed orthogonal neighborhood preserving embedded model in a CSTR (continuous stirred tank reactor) process, which are used for improving the fault monitoring accuracy in the chemical process.
Background
Continuous Stirred Tank Reactors (CSTRs) are important in the industrial chemical process facilities and are widely used in the chemical reactions. It is widely used in pharmaceutical and synthetic food industries, and in semiconductor manufacturing industries. Along with diversification of chemical industrial production equipment and raw materials and increasingly complicated process flow, various production safety accidents also enter a peak period of easy occurrence and multiple occurrence; therefore, fault monitoring in CSTR processes is also becoming increasingly important.
Multivariate Statistical Process Monitoring (MSPM) technology represented by principal component analysis has become a research hotspot for fault monitoring of chemical process due to the strong capability of extracting useful information. Modern increasingly complex chemical processes typically involve large numbers of production equipment and control systems whose measurement data have high-dimensional, strong correlations, especially strong non-linearities that are prevalent among variables. The MSPM technique does not effectively account for non-linear fluctuations in the data and therefore cannot be used to monitor non-linear chemical processes.
Due to the complex correlation between CSTR process variables, the existing fault monitoring model is usually a global model, it is difficult to fully adapt it as a global monitoring model for the whole process, since it ignores the local behavior of the physicochemical data, and the monitoring results are often difficult to interpret.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to solve the technical problem of providing a CSTR process Fault monitoring method based on a Fault-dependent distributed orthogonal neighborhood preserving embedding (FDONPE) model, so as to solve the technical problem of low Fault detection rate caused by neglecting of physicochemical parameters or local behaviors of data in the existing global model.
In order to solve the technical problems, the inventor establishes an FDONPE model based on an ONPE method based on long-term practical research in the field, and applies the FDONPE model to CSTR process fault monitoring so as to maintain local characteristics of process physical parameters or data and better extract distribution characteristics and essential information of each physical parameter.
Among them, the Neighborhood Orthogonal Preserving Embedding (ONPE) algorithm (Liu X M, Yin J W, Feng Z L, et al. organic New born Embedding for Face Recognition [ C ]// Proceedings of 2007IEEE International reference on Image, ICIP 2007.New York,2007: 133-.
The specific technical scheme adopted by the invention is as follows:
a construction method of a fault-related distributed orthogonal neighborhood preserving embedded model in a CSTR process is designed, and comprises the following steps:
(1) obtaining n historical normal samples of the physical quantity monitored by m physical quantity monitoring points in the CSTR process, and constructing a matrix X' belonging to the Rm×nSubtracting the mean value of all sample data in the row from each row of X', and dividing the mean value by the standard deviation of all sample data in the row to obtain a matrix X e Rm×n
(2) Using SNR algorithm to pick out the variable related to each fault to form B sub-blocks [ X ]1,X2,…,XB]And the global variable X is considered as a new block, constituting in total B +1 sub-blocks [ X1,…,XB+1]Sub-block
Figure BDA0002683442530000021
Sub-block samples
Figure BDA0002683442530000022
db(B-1, 2, …, B +1) is the subblock Xb(B-1, 2, …, B +1), where B is the number of known failure types.
(3) Obtaining each sub-block X based on ONPE modelb(B-1, 2, …, B +1) projection matrix
Figure BDA0002683442530000023
And calculating the historical normal sample of each sub-block
Figure BDA0002683442530000024
Statistic of (2)
Figure BDA0002683442530000031
And statistics SPEb,i(i=1,…,n)。
Figure BDA0002683442530000032
Figure BDA0002683442530000033
Wherein, ab,i(i=1,…,gb) Is the projection vector, gbIs dimension reduction, Λb=YbYbT/(n-1),Yb=AbTXb,yb,i=AbTxb,i(i=1,2,…,n)。
(4) Computing each sub-block X using a kernel density estimation functionb(B-1, 2, …, B) control limit
Figure BDA0002683442530000034
And control limit SPEb,lim
Further, in the step (2), the sub-blocks X are divided for the historical normal databThe method of (B ═ 1,2, …, B) is:
consider a set of fault data sets
Figure BDA0002683442530000035
XfThe data in (1) is collected in an operation mode in which a certain failure occurs in the system; wherein m isfIs the number of variables, nfIs the number of samples.
SNR is the ratio of signal s to noise e in a system, and each variable i (i ═ 1, …, m)f) SNR of (1)iThe calculation is as follows:
Figure BDA0002683442530000036
wherein
Figure BDA0002683442530000037
Xf(i, j) is XfValue in ith row and jth column, Xf(i,: means)XfThe vector of row i; SNRiIt is the signal-to-noise ratio of the ith variable in a certain failure operation mode, which reflects the change degree of the ith variable after failure, and is higher than each variable i (i is 1, …, m)f) SNR of (1)iThe magnitude of (c) indicates that it has changed significantly since the failure occurred, the selection and { SNR }i,i=1,…,mfAnd the variables corresponding to the first C maximum values in the sequence are taken as relevant variables of the fault.
Further, in the step (3), each sub-block X is calculated based on the ONPE modelb(B-1, 2, …, B +1) projection matrix
Figure BDA0002683442530000038
Comprises the following steps:
(3a) construction of neighborhood set Sb: for some normal history sample point xb,i(i ═ 1,2, …, n), calculating Euclidean distances to other sample points, and then selecting k with the minimum Euclidean distance to the sample pointbPoints constitute a neighborhood set
Figure BDA0002683442530000041
(3b) Determining a weight coefficient matrix Wb
By a minimization function
Figure BDA0002683442530000042
Obtaining a spatial neighborhood set SbIs given by the weight coefficient matrix Wb
Figure BDA0002683442530000043
Wherein
Figure BDA0002683442530000044
Represents a sample xb,iThe j-th proximity point, WbijIs a matrix WbRow i and column j of (1), representing a sample
Figure BDA0002683442530000045
For reconstructed sample xb,iThe weight coefficient of (a); the constraint condition is
Figure BDA0002683442530000046
If sample
Figure BDA0002683442530000047
Is not xb,iNeighborhood of (1), then Wbij=0。
(3c) Establishing an objective function J (y)b):
Figure BDA0002683442530000048
Wherein y isb,iIs xb,iThe vector of the projection of (a) is,
Figure BDA0002683442530000049
denotes yb,iOf the neighboring points.
(3d) Computing a projection matrix
Figure BDA00026834425300000410
Will be provided with
Figure BDA00026834425300000411
Substituting equation (5) yields:
J(Ab)=minAbTXbMbXbTAb (6)
wherein M isb=(Ib-Wb)T(Ib-Wb)。
Adding constraint conditions on the basis of the formula (6): a. thebTXbXbTAb=Ib
Figure BDA00026834425300000412
The Lagrange multiplier method is utilized to contain constraint to solve the optimization problem, and the formula (6) can be converted into the following generalized eigenvalue solutionThe problems are as follows:
XbMbXbTAb=λbXbXbTAb (7)
solving equation (7) yields:
1)ab,1is (X)bXbT)-1XbMbXbTThe feature vector corresponding to the minimum feature value of (1);
2)ab,i(i=2,…,gb) Is Qb(i)The feature vector corresponding to the minimum feature value of (1);
Qb(i)={Ib-(XbXbT)-1ab(i-1)[Gb(i-1)]T}(XbXbT)-1XbMbXbT (8)
in the formula, Gb(i-1)=[ab(i-1)]T(XbXbT)-1ab(i-1);ab(i-1)=[ab,1,ab,2,…ab,i-1]。
Determining all a from the formula (8)b,i(i=1,…,gb) To obtain a projection matrix Ab
On the other hand, a CSTR process fault monitoring method based on FDONPE is designed, and comprises the following steps:
firstly, acquiring n1 measurement samples of physical quantities of m physical quantity monitoring points in the chemical production process on line, and constructing a measurement matrix X'new∈Rm×n1Prepared from X'newSubtracting the average value of all sample data in the ith row of the matrix X' from each value in the ith (i-1, …, n1) row in (a), and dividing the average value by the standard deviation of all sample data in the ith row to obtain preprocessed Xnew. Handle XnewCorresponds to the sub-block of step (2) inclaim 1, forming B +1 sub-blocks [ X ]1,new,…,XB+1,new]Sub-block
Figure BDA0002683442530000051
Sub-block samples
Figure BDA0002683442530000052
② calculating each sub-block X by using fault monitoring method of ONPE modelb,newX of the ith (i ═ 1,2, …, n1) measurement sample of (a)b,newiStatistics
Figure BDA0002683442530000053
Statistics SPEb,newi
Figure BDA0002683442530000054
SPEb,newi=xb,newi(Ib-AbTAb)[xb,newi(Ib-AbTAb)]T (10)
Wherein, Λb=(AbTXb,new)(AbTXb,new)T/(n1-1),yb,newi=AbTxb,newi(i=1,2,…,n1)。
Constructing the ith measurement sample x based on Bayesian inferencenewi(i=1,...,n1)∈RmBayes statistic of (d):
Figure BDA0002683442530000055
Figure BDA0002683442530000056
n and F represent normal and fault conditions, statistics, respectively
Figure BDA0002683442530000061
And statistics SPEb,newiThe probabilities under normal and fault conditions are respectively:
Figure BDA0002683442530000062
Figure BDA0002683442530000063
statistics
Figure BDA0002683442530000064
And statistics SPEb,newiThe corresponding failure probabilities are respectively:
Figure BDA0002683442530000065
Figure BDA0002683442530000066
Figure BDA0002683442530000067
PSPE(xb,newi)=PSPE(xb,newi|N)PSPE(N)+PSPE(xb,newi|F)PSPE(F) (14)
wherein
Figure BDA0002683442530000068
As confidence level alpha (0 < alpha < 1),
Figure BDA0002683442530000069
is 1-alpha.
Fourthly, the Bayes statistic
Figure BDA00026834425300000610
And
Figure BDA00026834425300000611
comparing with the control limit 1-alpha respectively, the part exceeding the control limit indicates the ith sample xnewiA fault occurs.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the main beneficial technical effects that:
1. compared with the traditional CSTR process monitoring method based on the ONPE model, the CSTR process monitoring method based on the FDONPE model considers the local information of the process data, divides the process physical quantity into a plurality of sub-physical quantity modules through an SNR algorithm, then models each sub-physical quantity space by adopting the ONPE method, and finally constructs new statistic by adopting Bayesian inference to realize the monitoring of the CSTR process data; the method fully utilizes the intra-block local physicochemical data information and the overall global physicochemical data information, and improves the accuracy of fault monitoring.
2. According to the method, the fault information is utilized, the variable set strongly related to the fault is selected and used for model development, the monitoring model is established, and more meaningful directions can be extracted for monitoring, so that the accuracy of fault detection is improved.
The ONPE model has certain processing capacity on the nonlinear data, and the improved FDONPE model can effectively explain the nonlinear fluctuation in the physicochemical data; therefore, the process monitoring model established based on the nonlinear algorithm can also judge whether the online physicochemical data really deviate from the normal working condition.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of an off-line modeling process of a CSTR process monitoring method based on an FDONPE model according to the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a flow chart of the on-line monitoring process of the CSTR process monitoring method based on the FDONPE model of the present invention.
Fig. 3 is a monitoring result of thefault 10 in the CSTR monitoring process by using the ONPE method in the embodiment of the present invention, in which the abscissa is a sample and the ordinate is a statistic.
Fig. 4 is a monitoring result of thefault 10 in the CSTR monitoring process by using the fdonfe method in the embodiment of the present invention, in which the abscissa in the figure is a sample and the ordinate is a statistic.
Fig. 5 shows the 10 sub-block monitoring results of theCSTR fault 10 monitored by using the fdonne method in the embodiment of the present invention, where the abscissa in the figure is a sample and the ordinate is a statistic.
Detailed Description
The following examples are given to illustrate specific embodiments of the present invention, but are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention in any way.
The following embodiments are explained based on a CSTR system, data is generated by a CSTR model built by Simulink module of matlab, the simulation system can set a plurality of physical measurement point positions corresponding to 10 basic faults and 7 physical quantities to be monitored, and each fault is introduced from 201 th test sample. 1200 measurement data were collected, of which the first 200 were normal data and the last 1000 were failure data. Reactor solute concentration Q in example one at 10 failuresCThe description will be given with reference to variations as examples.
The first embodiment of the CSTR process monitoring method based on the FDONPE model is used for processing physical quantity data acquired at a plurality of physical quantity monitoring points in the CSTR process so as to monitor the physical quantity data which fails, and therefore production maintenance personnel can find problems in production as soon as possible and perform corresponding processing conveniently. The physical quantity monitoring points and the corresponding monitored physical quantities of the CSTR process are shown in Table 1.
The method mainly comprises the following steps:
step (I): establishing an offline FDONPE model
(1) Obtaining n historical normal samples of the physical quantity monitored by m physical quantity monitoring points in the CSTR process, and constructing a matrix X' belonging to the Rm×nSubtracting the mean value of all sample data in the row from each row of X' (the mean function of Matlab software can be used), and dividing the mean value by the standard deviation of all sample data in the row (the std function of Matlab software can be used) to obtain a matrix X epsilon Rm×nWhere m is 7 and n is 1200.
(2) The Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) algorithm is applied to pick out the variables related to each fault to form 10 subblocks, namely [ X ]1,X2,…,X10]Sub-block
Figure BDA0002683442530000081
db(b-1, 2, …,10) is the sub-block Xb(b is 1,2, …,10) the number of physical quantities, where d isb=2。
Partitioning sub-blocks [ X ] according to failure data1,X2,…,X10]The algorithm is as follows:
collecting a set of historical failure data sets
Figure BDA0002683442530000082
XfThe data in (1) is collected in an operation mode in which a certain failure occurs in the system; wherein m isf7 is the number of variables,nf800 is the number of samples.
SNR refers to the ratio of signal s to noise e in a system, and the SNR of each variable iiThe following can be calculated:
Figure BDA0002683442530000083
wherein
Figure BDA0002683442530000084
(the mean function of Matlab software can be used),
Figure BDA0002683442530000085
(eieiTobtained by var function of Matlab software), Xf(i, j) means XfThe value in the ith and jth columns, Xf(i,: means X)fThe vector of row i.
SNRiThe signal-to-noise ratio of the ith variable in a certain fault operation mode; it can reflect the change degree of the ith variable after the fault occurs; each variable i (i ═ 1, …, m)f) SNR of (1)iThe size of (d); selection and { SNRiAnd the variable corresponding to the first 2 maximum values in thei 1, …,7 is used as the related variable of the fault.
The variables corresponding to the first 2 maximum values of 10 faults in the CSTR process are found out as the related variables of the faults according to the method, and a sub-block is formed.
The global variable X is considered as a new block, taking into account the global nature of the data. The proposed algorithm therefore comprises 11 subblocks [ X ]1,…,X11]。
(3) Obtaining each sub-block X by applying fault monitoring method of ONPE modelb(b 1,2, …,11) projection matrix
Figure BDA0002683442530000091
And calculating historical normal sample x of each sub-blockb,i(i=1,2,…,1200)∈R2Statistic of (2)
Figure BDA0002683442530000092
And statistics SPEb,i(i=1,…,1200)。
Figure BDA0002683442530000093
Figure BDA0002683442530000094
Wherein, ai(i=1,…,gb) Is the projection vector, gbIs the dimension of dimension reduction, here gbIs generally equal to pair sub-block Xb(b is 1,2, …,11) the contribution rate of PCA (principal component analysis) decomposition is 85% (PCA function of Matlab software can be used). Lambdab=YbYbT/(1200-1),Yb=AbTXb,yb,i=AbTxb,i(i=1,2,…,1200)。
Calculating each sub-block X by applying ONPE modelb(b 1,2, …,11) projection matrix abMainly comprises the following steps:
(3a) construction of neighborhood set Sb
For some normal history sample point xb,i(i ═ 1,2, …,1200), the Euclidean distances to other sample points are calculated (using matlab function EuDist2), and then k is chosen that is the minimum Euclidean distance from this sample pointbPoints constitute a neighborhood set
Figure BDA0002683442530000095
Where k isb=Kb+1,KbIs sub-block Xb(b is 1,2, …,11) the contribution rate of PCA (principal component analysis) decomposition is 85% (PCA function of Matlab software can be used).
(3b) Determining a weight coefficient matrix Wb
First, by minimizing a function
Figure BDA0002683442530000101
Obtaining a spatial neighborhood set SbIs given by the weight coefficient matrix Wb:
Figure BDA0002683442530000102
Wherein
Figure BDA0002683442530000103
Represents a sample xb,iThe j-th proximity point, WbijIs a matrix WbRow i and column j of (1), representing a sample
Figure BDA0002683442530000104
For reconstructed sample xb,iThe weight coefficient of (a); the constraint condition is
Figure BDA0002683442530000105
If the sample
Figure BDA0002683442530000106
Is not xb,iNeighborhood of (1), then Wbij=0。
(3c) Establishing an objective function J (y)b):
Figure BDA0002683442530000107
Wherein y isb,iIs xb,iThe vector of the projection of (a) is,
Figure BDA0002683442530000108
denotes yb,iOf the neighboring points.
(3d) Computing a projection matrix AbThis can be obtained by solving equation (19):
will be provided with
Figure BDA0002683442530000109
Substituting into equation (19), the reduction can be:
J(Ab)=minAbTXbMbXbTAb (20)
wherein M isb=(Ib-Wb)T(Ib-Wb)。
Adding a constraint condition on the basis of the formula (20): a. thebTXbXbTAb=Ib
Figure BDA00026834425300001010
By solving the above optimization problem using lagrange multiplier method including constraints, equation (20) can be converted into the following generalized eigenvalue solution problem, namely:
XbMbXbTAb=λbXbXbTAb (21)
solving equation (21) yields:
1)ab,1is (X)bXbT)-1XbMbXbTThe minimum eigenvalue of (matlab function eigs).
2)ab,i(i=2,…,gb) Is Qb(i)The minimum eigenvalue of (matlab function eigs).
Qb(i)={Ib-(XbXbT)-1ab(i-1)[Gb(i-1)]T}(XbXbT)-1XbMbXbT (22)
In the formula: gb(i-1)=[ab(i-1)]T(XbXbT)-1ab(i-1);ab(i-1)=[ab,1,ab,2,…ab,i-1]。
We can find all a by equation (22)b,i(i=1,…,gb) To obtain a projection matrix Ab
(4) Computing each sub-block X using Kernel Density Estimation (KDE)bControl limit of (B ═ 1,2, …, B)
Figure BDA0002683442530000111
And control limit SPEb,lim(using the fitsist and icdf functions of matlab software).
Step (II): online process monitoring
(5) 1200 measurement samples of the physical quantity of 7 physical quantity monitoring points in the CSTR process are acquired on line, and a measurement matrix X 'is constructed'new∈R7×1200To measurement matrix X'newPretreatment is carried out, namely X'newSubtracting the average value of all sample data in ith row of the matrix X' from each value in ith (i-1, 2, …,7) row in (a), and dividing by the standard deviation of all sample data in ith row to obtain preprocessed Xnew(ii) a Handle XnewCorresponding the data in step (2) to the sub-blocks to form 11 sub-blocks [ X ]1,new,…,X11,new]。
(6) Each sub-block X is calculated according to equations (3) to (4)b,newX of the ith (i ═ 1,2, …,1200) measurement sample of (a)b,newiStatistics
Figure BDA0002683442530000112
Statistics SPEb,newi
(7) Constructing the ith measurement sample x according to equations (5) - (8) and Bayesian inferencenewi(i=1,...,n1)∈RmBayesian statistics of
Figure BDA0002683442530000113
And
Figure BDA0002683442530000114
(8) bayesian statistics
Figure BDA0002683442530000115
And
Figure BDA0002683442530000116
the part exceeding the control limit indicates the ith sample x, compared with the control limit 1-alpha (alpha is 0.99), respectivelynewiA fault occurs.
Specific monitoring results are shown in fig. 3 and table 4.
The monitoring result of the faults in the chemical production process can be obtained through the circulation of the two steps.
Thefault 10 is caused by the volume concentration QCFaults caused by changes are introduced into 201 th to 1200 th sample points, and the physical quantity of the faults is 5. The detection results based on the ONPE and FDONPE methods are shown in fig. 3, 4, and 5, where the dotted line indicates the control limit and the solid line indicates the value of the statistic.
From the detection result of thefailure 10, it can be seen that N is passed2Statistics shows that the detection result of FDONPE reaches 86 percent, while N of ONPE2The statistic was only 58% detected, it is evident that FDONPE is in
Figure BDA0002683442530000121
The detection result of the statistic is obviously improved, so that the FDONPE method is superior to the ONPE method, and the subblock results of the FDONPE method are analyzed, wherein the detection results of thesubblocks 1,2,5,6 and 10 are shown in
Figure BDA0002683442530000122
And BICSPEThe detection rate of the statistic is ideal, the 5 sub-blocks all contain the variable 5, and the detection results of the remaining sub-blocks without the variable 5 are not ideal, so that the variable 5 is a responsible variable of thefault 10, and the variable 5 corresponds to the cooling water temperature QCThis verifies the feasibility of the method of the invention.
Through the analysis, in thefault 10, the FDONPE method is superior to the ONPE method, and more accurate information can be provided for monitoring personnel.
Experimental example: a CSTR model is adopted to simulate the specific application of a chemical production process fault monitoring method based on a distributed ONPE model (FDONPE), the table 1 lists the physical quantities acquired by 7 physical quantity monitoring points in the CSTR process, the table 2 lists 10 faults highly related to the physical quantity data acquired by the 7 physical quantity monitoring points, the table 3 lists the blocking results of the process physical quantities through an SNR algorithm, and the table 4 shows the fault monitoring accuracy rate (the fault monitoring accuracy rate is) when the 10 faults are monitored by respectively adopting PCA, NMF, NPE, ONPE and FDONPE
Figure BDA0002683442530000123
Figure BDA0002683442530000124
Wherein T is2,N2,SPE,
Figure BDA0002683442530000125
BICSPERespectively, monitoring statistics for different methods.
TABLE 1 CSTR System physical quantity information
Figure BDA0002683442530000126
Figure BDA0002683442530000131
TABLE 2 CSTR System 1O Process failures
Figure BDA0002683442530000132
TABLE 3 variable selection results for faults
Fault numberBlock numberVariables of
113,5
227,5
333,7
441,2
552,5
666,5
773,2
884,2
997,6
10105,1
Table 4 shows the fault monitoring results of 10 types of faults in the chemical production process using the PCA process monitoring method, the NPE process monitoring method, the ONPE process monitoring method, and the FDONPE process monitoring method in the CSTR simulation system. It can be seen that the fdonne process monitoring method shows the highest fault detection rate in most fault modes and has better performance in the modes offaults 8, 9 and 10, compared to the NPE process monitoring method or the onne process monitoring method.
TABLE 4 Fault detection accuracy comparison
Figure BDA0002683442530000141
The present invention is described in detail with reference to the examples above; however, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in the specific parameters of the embodiments described above may be made or equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the present invention, so as to form various embodiments, which are not limited to the specific parameters of the embodiments described above, and the detailed description thereof is omitted here.

Claims (4)

Translated fromChinese
1.一种CSTR过程中故障相关分布式正交邻域保持嵌入模型的构建方法,其特征在于,包括以下步骤:1. a method for constructing a fault-related distributed orthogonal neighborhood to maintain an embedded model in a CSTR process, is characterized in that, comprises the following steps:(1)获取CSTR过程中m个物理量监测点监测的物理量的n个历史正常样本,并构建矩阵X′∈Rm×n,将X′的每一行减去这一行所有样本数据的均值,然后除以这一行所有样本数据的标准差,得到矩阵X∈Rm×n(1) Obtain n historical normal samples of physical quantities monitored by m physical quantity monitoring points in the CSTR process, and construct a matrix X′∈Rm×n , subtract the mean value of all sample data in this row from each row of X′, and then Divide by the standard deviation of all sample data in this row to get the matrix X∈Rm×n ;(2)应用信噪比算法挑选出与每个故障相关的变量,构成B个子块[X1,X2,…,XB],且将全局变量X看成是一个新块,总计构成B+1个子块[X1,…,XB+1],子块
Figure FDA0002683442520000011
子块样本
Figure FDA0002683442520000012
db(b=1,2,…,B+1)是子块Xb(b=1,2,…,B+1)内物理量的个数,B是已知故障类型的个数;(2) Apply the signal-to-noise ratio algorithm to select the variables related to each fault to form B sub-blocks [X1 , X2 ,..., XB ], and regard the global variable X as a new block, which constitutes B in total +1 sub-block [X1 ,...,XB+1 ], sub-block
Figure FDA0002683442520000011
sub-block samples
Figure FDA0002683442520000012
db (b=1,2,...,B+1) is the number of physical quantities in the sub-block Xb (b=1,2,...,B+1), and B is the number of known fault types;(3)基于ONPE模型获得每个子块Xb(b=1,2,…,B+1)的投影矩阵
Figure FDA0002683442520000013
并计算每个子块历史正常样本
Figure FDA0002683442520000014
的统计量
Figure FDA0002683442520000015
和统计量SPEb,i(i=1,…,n);
(3) Obtain the projection matrix of each sub-block Xb (b=1,2,...,B+1) based on the ONPE model
Figure FDA0002683442520000013
and calculate the historical normal samples of each sub-block
Figure FDA0002683442520000014
statistic
Figure FDA0002683442520000015
and statistic SPEb,i (i=1,...,n);
Figure FDA0002683442520000016
Figure FDA0002683442520000016
Figure FDA0002683442520000017
Figure FDA0002683442520000017
其中,ai(i=1,…,gb)是第b个子块的投影向量,gb是第b个子块的降维维度,Λb=YbYbT/(n-1),Yb=AbTXb,yb,i=AbTxb,i(i=1,2,…,n);Among them, ai (i=1,...,gb ) is the projection vector of the b-th sub-block, gb is the dimension reduction dimension of the b-th sub-block, Λb =Yb YbT /(n-1), Yb =AbT Xb , yb,i =AbT xb,i (i=1,2,...,n);(4)应用核密度估计函数计算每个子块Xb(b=1,2,…,B)的控制限
Figure FDA0002683442520000018
和控制限SPEb,lim
(4) Apply the kernel density estimation function to calculate the control limits of each sub-block Xb (b=1,2,...,B)
Figure FDA0002683442520000018
and the control limit SPEb,lim .
2.根据权利要求1所述CSTR过程中故障相关分布式正交邻域保持嵌入模型的构建方法,其特征在于,在所述步骤(2)中,对历史正常数据划分子块Xb(b=1,2,…,B)的方法为:2. in the described CSTR process according to claim 1, fault-related distributed orthogonal neighborhood maintains the construction method of embedded model, it is characterized in that, in described step (2), to historical normal data division sub-block Xb (b =1,2,...,B) method is:采集一组历史故障数据集
Figure FDA0002683442520000019
Xf中的数据是在系统发生某种故障的操作模式下收集的;其中mf是变量的个数,nf是样本数;
Collect a set of historical failure data sets
Figure FDA0002683442520000019
The data in Xf are collected in the operating mode where the system has some kind of failure; where mf is the number of variables and nf is the number of samples;
SNR为一个系统中信号s与噪声e的比例,每一个变量i(i=1,…,mf)的SNRi计算如下:SNR is the ratio of signal s to noise e in a system. The SNRi of each variable i (i=1,...,mf ) is calculated as follows:
Figure FDA0002683442520000021
Figure FDA0002683442520000021
其中
Figure FDA0002683442520000022
Xf(i,j)为Xf中第i行,第j列的值,Xf(i,:)指的是Xf中第i行的向量;SNRi是指在某个故障操作模式下,第i个变量的信噪比,其反应发生故障后第i个变量的变化程度,比每一个变量i(i=1,…,mf)的SNRi的大小,选择与{SNRi,i=1,…,mf}中的前C个最大值相对应的变量作为该故障的相关变量。
in
Figure FDA0002683442520000022
Xf (i,j) is the value of the i-th row and j-th column in Xf , Xf (i,:) refers to the vector of the i-th row in Xf ; SNRi refers to a fault operating mode Next, the signal-to-noise ratio of the i-th variable, which reflects the degree of change of the i-th variable after the failure, is greater than the size of the SNRi of each variable i (i=1,...,mf ), which is chosen to be the same as {SNRi ,i =1, .
3.根据权利要求1所述CSTR过程中故障相关分布式正交邻域保持嵌入模型的构建方法,其特征在于,在所述步骤(3)中,基于ONPE模型计算出每个子块Xb(b=1,2,…,B+1)的投影矩阵
Figure FDA0002683442520000023
包含以下步骤:
3. in the described CSTR process according to claim 1, fault-related distributed orthogonal neighborhood maintains the construction method of embedded model, it is characterized in that, in described step (3), calculates each sub-block X based onONPE model ( b=1,2,...,B+1) projection matrix
Figure FDA0002683442520000023
Contains the following steps:
(3a)构建邻域集Sb:针对某个正常历史样本点xb,i(i=1,2,…,n),计算与其它样本点的欧式距离,然后选取距离此样本点欧氏距离最小的kb个点组成邻域集
Figure FDA0002683442520000024
(3a) Construct a neighborhood set Sb : for a certain normal historical sample point xb,i (i=1,2,...,n), calculate the Euclidean distance with other sample points, and then select the Euclidean distance from this sample point The kb points with the smallest distance form a neighborhood set
Figure FDA0002683442520000024
(3b)确定权重系数矩阵Wb(3b) Determine the weight coefficient matrix Wb :由最小化函数
Figure FDA0002683442520000025
得到空间邻域集Sb的权重系数矩阵Wb
by the minimization function
Figure FDA0002683442520000025
The weight coefficient matrix Wb of the spatial neighborhood set Sb is obtained:
Figure FDA0002683442520000026
Figure FDA0002683442520000026
其中
Figure FDA0002683442520000027
表示样本xb,i的第j个临近点,Wbij为矩阵Wb的第i行第j列元素,代表样本
Figure FDA0002683442520000028
对重构样本xb,i的权重系数;约束条件为
Figure FDA0002683442520000029
若样本
Figure FDA00026834425200000210
不是xb,i的邻域,则Wbij=0;
in
Figure FDA0002683442520000027
Represents the j-th adjacent point of the sample xb, i , Wbij is the i-th row and j-th column element of the matrix Wb , representing the sample
Figure FDA0002683442520000028
The weight coefficient of the reconstructed sample xb,i ; the constraints are
Figure FDA0002683442520000029
If the sample
Figure FDA00026834425200000210
is not the neighborhood of xb,i , then Wbij =0;
(3c)建立目标函数J(yb):(3c) Establish the objective function J(yb ):
Figure FDA0002683442520000031
Figure FDA0002683442520000031
其中yb,i为xb,i的投影向量,
Figure FDA0002683442520000032
表示yb,i的邻近点;
where yb,i is the projection vector of xb,i ,
Figure FDA0002683442520000032
Represents the adjacent points of yb, i ;
(3d)计算投影矩阵
Figure FDA0002683442520000033
(3d) Calculate the projection matrix
Figure FDA0002683442520000033
Figure FDA0002683442520000034
带入公式(5)得:
Will
Figure FDA0002683442520000034
Bring in formula (5) to get:
J(Ab)=minAbTXbMbXbTAb (6)J(Ab )=minAbT Xb Mb XbT Ab (6)其中Mb=(Ib-Wb)T(Ib-Wb);where Mb =(Ib -Wb )T (Ib -Wb );在式(6)的基础上加入约束条件:AbTXbXbTAb=Ib
Figure FDA0002683442520000035
利用拉格朗日乘子法包含约束来求解以上优化问题,式(6)可以转化为如下的广义特征值求解问题,即:
Add constraints on the basis of formula (6): AbT Xb XbT Ab =Ib ,
Figure FDA0002683442520000035
Using the Lagrange multiplier method to include constraints to solve the above optimization problem, equation (6) can be transformed into the following generalized eigenvalue solution problem, namely:
XbMbXbTAb=λbXbXbTAb (7)Xb Mb XbT Abb Xb XbT Ab (7)求解公式(7)得:Solving Equation (7) we get:1)ab,1是(XbXbT)-1XbMbXbT的最小特征值对应的特征向量;1) ab,1 is the eigenvector corresponding to the minimum eigenvalue of (Xb XbT )-1 Xb Mb XbT ;2)ab,i(i=2,…,gb)是Qb(i)的最小特征值对应的特征向量;2) ab,i (i=2,...,gb ) is the eigenvector corresponding to the smallest eigenvalue of Qb(i) ;Qb(i)={Ib-(XbXbT)-1ab(i-1)[Gb(i-1)]T}(XbXbT)-1XbMbXbT (8)Qb(i) = {Ib -(Xb XbT )-1 ab(i-1) [Gb(i-1) ]T }(Xb XbT )-1 Xb Mb XbT (8)式中,Gb(i-1)=[ab(i-1)]T(XbXbT)-1ab(i-1);ab(i-1)=[ab,1,ab,2,…ab,i-1];In the formula, Gb(i-1) = [ab(i-1) ]T (Xb XbT )-1 ab(i-1) ; ab(i-1) = [ab, 1 ,ab,2 ,…ab,i-1 ];由(8)式求出所有的ab,i(i=1,…,gb)的值,得到投影矩阵AbAll the values of ab,i (i=1,...,gb ) are obtained from equation (8), and the projection matrix Ab is obtained.
4.一种基于FDONPE的CSTR过程故障监控方法,包括如下步骤:4. A CSTR process fault monitoring method based on FDONPE, comprising the steps:①在线采集化工生产过程中m个物理量监测点的物理量的n1个测量样本,①On-line collection of n1 measurement samples of physical quantities of m physical quantity monitoring points in the chemical production process,并构建测量矩阵X′new∈Rm×n1,将X′new中的第i(i=1,…,n1)行的每一个值减去矩阵X′第i行所有样本数据的均值,然后除以第i行所有样本数据的标准差,得到预处理后的XnewAnd construct the measurement matrix X′new ∈ Rm×n1 , subtract the mean value of all sample data in the i-th row of the matrix X′ from each value of the i-th row (i=1,...,n1) in X′-new , and then Divide by the standard deviation of all sample data in row i to get the preprocessed Xnew ;把Xnew的数据对应到权利要求1中所述步骤(2)的子块内,形成B+1个子块[X1,new,…,XB+1,new],子块
Figure FDA0002683442520000041
子块样本
Figure FDA0002683442520000042
Corresponding the data of Xnew to the sub-block of the step (2) in claim 1, forming B+1 sub-blocks [X1,new ,...,XB+1,new ], the sub-block
Figure FDA0002683442520000041
sub-block samples
Figure FDA0002683442520000042
②使用ONPE模型的故障监测方法计算每一个子块Xb,new的第i(i=1,2,…,n1)个测量样本的xb,newi统计量
Figure FDA0002683442520000043
统计量SPEb,newi
②Use the fault monitoring method of the ONPE model to calculate the xb,newi statistics of the i-th (i=1,2,...,n1) measurement sample of each sub-block Xb,new
Figure FDA0002683442520000043
Statistics SPEb,newi ;
Figure FDA0002683442520000044
Figure FDA0002683442520000044
SPEb,newi=xb,newi(Ib-AbTAb)[xb,newi(Ib-AbTAb)]T (10)SPEb,newi =xb,newi (Ib -AbT Ab )[xb,newi (Ib -AbT Ab )]T (10)其中,Λb=(AbTXb,new)(AbTXb,new)T/(n1-1),yb,newi=AbTxb,newi(i=1,2,…,n1);Among them, Λb =(AbT Xb,new )(AbT Xb,new )T /(n1-1), yb,newi =AbT xb,newi (i=1,2, ...,n1);③基于贝叶斯推理构造第i个测量样本xnewi(i=1,...,n1)∈Rm的贝叶斯统计量:③Construct the Bayesian statistic of the i-th measurement sample xnewi (i=1,...,n1)∈Rm based on Bayesian inference:
Figure FDA0002683442520000045
Figure FDA0002683442520000045
Figure FDA0002683442520000046
Figure FDA0002683442520000046
N和F分别代表正常状况和故障状况,统计量
Figure FDA0002683442520000047
和统计量SPEb,newi对应正常和故障条件下的概率分别为:
N and F represent normal and fault conditions, respectively, statistics
Figure FDA0002683442520000047
and the statistic SPEb, newi corresponding to the probability under normal and fault conditions are:
Figure FDA0002683442520000048
Figure FDA0002683442520000048
Figure FDA0002683442520000049
Figure FDA0002683442520000049
统计量
Figure FDA00026834425200000410
和统计量SPEb,newi对应的故障概率分别为:
Statistics
Figure FDA00026834425200000410
The failure probabilities corresponding to the statistics SPEb and newi are:
Figure FDA00026834425200000411
Figure FDA00026834425200000411
Figure FDA00026834425200000412
Figure FDA00026834425200000412
Figure FDA00026834425200000413
Figure FDA00026834425200000413
PSPE(xb,newi)=PSPE(xb,newi|N)PSPE(N)+PSPE(xb,newi|F)PSPE(F) (14)PSPE (xb, newi ) = PSPE (xb, newi |N) PSPE (N)+PSPE (xb, newi | F) PSPE (F) (14)其中
Figure FDA0002683442520000051
为置信水平α(0<α<1),
Figure FDA0002683442520000052
为1-α;
in
Figure FDA0002683442520000051
is the confidence level α (0<α<1),
Figure FDA0002683442520000052
is 1-α;
④将贝叶斯统计量
Figure FDA0002683442520000053
Figure FDA0002683442520000054
分别与控制限1-α相比较,超出控制限的部分即表明第i个样本xnewi有故障发生。
④The Bayesian statistic
Figure FDA0002683442520000053
and
Figure FDA0002683442520000054
Compared with the control limit 1-α, the part beyond the control limit indicates that the ith sample xnewi has a fault.
CN202010969145.8A2020-09-152020-09-15 Construction method of fault-related distributed orthogonal neighborhood preserving embedding model in CSTR process and its fault monitoring methodActiveCN112180893B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application NumberPriority DateFiling DateTitle
CN202010969145.8ACN112180893B (en)2020-09-152020-09-15 Construction method of fault-related distributed orthogonal neighborhood preserving embedding model in CSTR process and its fault monitoring method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application NumberPriority DateFiling DateTitle
CN202010969145.8ACN112180893B (en)2020-09-152020-09-15 Construction method of fault-related distributed orthogonal neighborhood preserving embedding model in CSTR process and its fault monitoring method

Publications (2)

Publication NumberPublication Date
CN112180893Atrue CN112180893A (en)2021-01-05
CN112180893B CN112180893B (en)2021-07-13

Family

ID=73921192

Family Applications (1)

Application NumberTitlePriority DateFiling Date
CN202010969145.8AActiveCN112180893B (en)2020-09-152020-09-15 Construction method of fault-related distributed orthogonal neighborhood preserving embedding model in CSTR process and its fault monitoring method

Country Status (1)

CountryLink
CN (1)CN112180893B (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
CN114757269A (en)*2022-03-232022-07-15华东理工大学Complex process refined fault detection method based on local subspace-neighborhood preserving embedding

Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
CN101713983A (en)*2009-11-232010-05-26浙江大学Semiconductor process monitoring method based on independent component analysis and Bayesian inference
WO2015171328A1 (en)*2014-05-092015-11-12Honeywell International Inc.Temperature-based level detection and control method and apparatus
CN107885914A (en)*2017-10-252018-04-06华东理工大学Industrial reactor running status visualizes on-line monitoring method
CN108762228A (en)*2018-05-252018-11-06江南大学A kind of multi-state fault monitoring method based on distributed PCA
CN109062189A (en)*2018-08-302018-12-21华中科技大学A kind of industrial process method for diagnosing faults for complex fault
CN109189028A (en)*2018-10-152019-01-11江南大学PCA method for diagnosing faults based on muti-piece information extraction
CN109298633A (en)*2018-10-092019-02-01郑州轻工业学院 Fault monitoring method in chemical production process based on adaptive block non-negative matrix decomposition
CN109407652A (en)*2018-12-102019-03-01中国石油大学(华东)Multivariable industrial process fault detection method based on major-minor pca model
CN109870986A (en)*2019-02-282019-06-11天津大学 An online control method for stirring reactor based on neural network and data-driven
US20190391568A1 (en)*2018-06-212019-12-26Honeywell International Inc.Feature extraction and fault detection in a non-stationary process through unsupervised machine learning
CN110674461A (en)*2019-09-202020-01-10郑州轻工业学院Chemical production process monitoring method based on multi-block projection non-negative matrix decomposition
CN111639304A (en)*2020-06-022020-09-08江南大学CSTR fault positioning method based on Xgboost regression model

Patent Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
CN101713983A (en)*2009-11-232010-05-26浙江大学Semiconductor process monitoring method based on independent component analysis and Bayesian inference
WO2015171328A1 (en)*2014-05-092015-11-12Honeywell International Inc.Temperature-based level detection and control method and apparatus
CN107885914A (en)*2017-10-252018-04-06华东理工大学Industrial reactor running status visualizes on-line monitoring method
CN108762228A (en)*2018-05-252018-11-06江南大学A kind of multi-state fault monitoring method based on distributed PCA
US20190391568A1 (en)*2018-06-212019-12-26Honeywell International Inc.Feature extraction and fault detection in a non-stationary process through unsupervised machine learning
CN109062189A (en)*2018-08-302018-12-21华中科技大学A kind of industrial process method for diagnosing faults for complex fault
CN109298633A (en)*2018-10-092019-02-01郑州轻工业学院 Fault monitoring method in chemical production process based on adaptive block non-negative matrix decomposition
CN109189028A (en)*2018-10-152019-01-11江南大学PCA method for diagnosing faults based on muti-piece information extraction
CN109407652A (en)*2018-12-102019-03-01中国石油大学(华东)Multivariable industrial process fault detection method based on major-minor pca model
CN109870986A (en)*2019-02-282019-06-11天津大学 An online control method for stirring reactor based on neural network and data-driven
CN110674461A (en)*2019-09-202020-01-10郑州轻工业学院Chemical production process monitoring method based on multi-block projection non-negative matrix decomposition
CN111639304A (en)*2020-06-022020-09-08江南大学CSTR fault positioning method based on Xgboost regression model

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
彭开香 等: "复杂工业过程质量相关的故障检测与诊断技术综述", 《自动化学报》*
王妍: "基于时序模型的闭环工业系统的故障监测", 《中国博士学位论文全文数据库 信息科技辑》*
邓佳伟 等: "基于加权统计局部核主元分析的非线性化工过程微小故障诊断方法", 《化工学报》*
邓晓刚 等: "基于贝叶斯ICA的多工况非高斯过程故障检测", 《控制工程》*

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication numberPriority datePublication dateAssigneeTitle
CN114757269A (en)*2022-03-232022-07-15华东理工大学Complex process refined fault detection method based on local subspace-neighborhood preserving embedding

Also Published As

Publication numberPublication date
CN112180893B (en)2021-07-13

Similar Documents

PublicationPublication DateTitle
CN106644162B (en)Ring main unit wire core temperature soft measurement method based on neighborhood preserving embedding regression algorithm
CN101446831B (en) A decentralized approach to process monitoring
CN109389314B (en)Quality soft measurement and monitoring method based on optimal neighbor component analysis
CN108958226B (en)TE process fault detection method based on survival information potential-principal component analysis algorithm
CN109085805A (en)A kind of industrial process fault detection method based on multi-sampling rate Factor Analysis Model
CN109472097B (en)Fault diagnosis method for online monitoring equipment of power transmission line
CN116738192A (en)Digital twinning-based security data evaluation method and system
CN110083860A (en)A kind of industrial method for diagnosing faults based on correlated variables selection
CN117688496B (en)Abnormality diagnosis method, system and equipment for satellite telemetry multidimensional time sequence data
CN109298633A (en) Fault monitoring method in chemical production process based on adaptive block non-negative matrix decomposition
CN119740203A (en) A regression prediction method for dynamic parameters of gas turbine based on fusion network
CN120086539B (en)Heavy gas turbine compressor scale deposit detection method based on liquid neural network
CN119179919A (en)On-line monitoring and diagnosing system for hydroelectric equipment
CN119988897A (en) Fault Identification Method Based on Intelligent Model
CN117786302A (en)MCC weighting-based least square support vector regression anomaly detection method
CN112180893B (en) Construction method of fault-related distributed orthogonal neighborhood preserving embedding model in CSTR process and its fault monitoring method
CN120185193A (en) Intelligent power distribution cabinet state dynamic monitoring method and system
CN114415609B (en)Dynamic process refinement monitoring method based on multi-subspace division
CN118861950B (en)Transformer multi-parameter fusion state evaluation method, device, equipment and medium
CN115878987A (en)Fault positioning method based on contribution value and causal graph
CN113076211B (en)Quality-related fault diagnosis and false alarm feedback method based on fault reconstruction
CN119066326A (en) A method and device for reconstructing data of a failed sensor in a nuclear power system
CN116305733B (en)Quality-related fault detection method based on global and local feature extraction
CN108536943B (en)Fault monitoring method based on multi-production-unit variable cross-correlation decoupling strategy
CN116821828A (en)Multi-dimensional time sequence prediction method based on industrial data

Legal Events

DateCodeTitleDescription
PB01Publication
PB01Publication
SE01Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01Patent grant
GR01Patent grant

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp