技术领域technical field
本发明涉及评审专家使用管理的方法，尤其涉及对评审专家进行绩效评价的方法。The invention relates to a method for using and managing review experts, in particular to a method for evaluating the performance of review experts.
背景技术Background technique
在公司目前的科研项目管理体制中，随着专业化、科学化管理要求的不断加强，评审专家成为重要群体，他们在科研项目的建议征集、评估评审、总结验收过程中往往承担着主导性作用。因此，因此很有必要开展专家的行为特征分析，构建专家评审行为评价体系和模型，用于监控评审专家的评审行为和评审工作质量，进而完善科研项目管理体制。In the company's current scientific research project management system, with the continuous strengthening of professional and scientific management requirements, review experts have become an important group, and they often play a leading role in the process of proposal collection, evaluation review, and summary acceptance of scientific research projects . Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the behavioral characteristics of experts, build an evaluation system and model of expert review behavior, and use it to monitor the review behavior of review experts and the quality of review work, and then improve the scientific research project management system.
发明内容Contents of the invention
本发明针对现有技术存在的以上问题，通过对专家在评审活动中的行为特征进行研究，建立对专家评审行为的评价模型，对评审专家在评审过程中的表现和工作质量进行绩效评价，从过程和结果两方面监控评审专家的评审行为。The present invention aims at the above problems existing in the prior art, by studying the behavior characteristics of experts in review activities, establishing an evaluation model for expert review behavior, and performing performance evaluation on the performance and work quality of review experts in the review process, from The review behavior of review experts is monitored in both process and result.
为了实现上述目的，本发明采用以下技术方案：In order to achieve the above object, the present invention adopts the following technical solutions:
本发明提供了对评审专家进行绩效评价的方法，包括以下步骤：The invention provides a method for evaluating the performance of review experts, including the following steps:
S1)选取绩效评价模型的评价指标；S1) selecting the evaluation index of the performance evaluation model;
S2)确定所述评价指标的权重；S2) determining the weight of the evaluation index;
S3)确定所述评价指标的评价标准。S3) Determine the evaluation standard of the evaluation index.
所述步骤S1包括以下步骤：Said step S1 comprises the following steps:
S11)通过案头分析初步梳理初始评价指标；S11) Preliminary sorting out the initial evaluation indicators through desk analysis;
S12)通过调研问卷收集意见，对初始评价指标的重要性程度打分；S12) collect opinions through survey questionnaires, and score the importance of the initial evaluation indicators;
S13)筛选重要性程度得分大的指标，形成绩效评价指标体系。S13) Screening indicators with high importance scores to form a performance evaluation indicator system.
所述绩效评价模型包括评审工作质量和评审工作表现两个子评价指标体系。The performance evaluation model includes two sub-evaluation index systems of evaluation work quality and evaluation work performance.
所述步骤S2包括以下步骤：Described step S2 comprises the following steps:
S21)运用层次分析法，建立评价指标成对比较矩阵；S21) using the AHP to establish a pairwise comparison matrix of evaluation indicators;
S22)将各评价指标成对比较矩阵录入YAAHP软件，计算得出绩效评价指标体系中各评价指标的权重。S22) Enter the pairwise comparison matrix of each evaluation index into the YAAHP software, and calculate the weight of each evaluation index in the performance evaluation index system.
所述步骤S3包括以下步骤：Described step S3 comprises the following steps:
S31)区分指标属性，划分为定性评价指标和定量评价指标；S31) Distinguish the attribute of the index, and divide it into a qualitative evaluation index and a quantitative evaluation index;
S32)对于定性评价指标，根据评价指标轻重程度制定评价标准；S32) For the qualitative evaluation index, formulate the evaluation standard according to the severity of the evaluation index;
S33)对于定量评价指标，针对性地选择正态分布法和百分位数法制定评价标准。S33) For the quantitative evaluation index, the normal distribution method and the percentile method are selected to formulate the evaluation standard.
所述步骤S32是指根据评价指标轻重程度，为每一个定性评价指标设置详细的具有可操作性的衡量等级标准，每个定性评价指标划分10个等级标准，对应1—10分，5分为合格分。The step S32 refers to setting detailed and operable measurement grade standards for each qualitative evaluation index according to the severity of the evaluation index, and each qualitative evaluation index is divided into 10 grade standards, corresponding to 1-10 points, 5 points passing score.
所述步骤S33包括以下步骤：Described step S33 comprises the following steps:
在SPSS软件中将计算出的定量评价指标进行正态拟合，得出置信度为95％的置信区间范围，将该范围定义为评价指标合理范围，不在此范围的数据定义为异常值；In the SPSS software, the calculated quantitative evaluation index is carried out normal fitting, and the confidence interval range with a confidence degree of 95% is obtained, which is defined as the reasonable range of the evaluation index, and the data outside this range are defined as abnormal values;
根据所述定量评价指标值的合理范围和异常范围，按强制比例法划分各等级标准，对应1—10分；According to the reasonable range and abnormal range of the quantitative evaluation index value, each level standard is divided according to the mandatory ratio method, corresponding to 1-10 points;
通过统计分析，得到定量评价指标的合理值及异常值的各等级得分的标准。Through statistical analysis, the reasonable value of the quantitative evaluation index and the standard of each grade score of the abnormal value are obtained.
所述评审工作表现中的评价指标为定性评价指标，适用于步骤S32，所述评审工作质量中的评价指标为定量评价指标，适用于步骤S33。The evaluation index in the evaluation work performance is a qualitative evaluation index, applicable to step S32, and the evaluation index in the evaluation work quality is a quantitative evaluation index, applicable to step S33.
对评审专家进行绩效评价的方法，还包括步骤S4)，经过所述步骤S1、S2、S3后，形成评审专家绩效评价表单，用于对评审专家进行日常/年度绩效评价，在评审专家绩效评价表单中录入评审工作表现和评审工作质量的各评价指标的平均得分，计算得出绩效得分和绩效等次。The method for evaluating the performance of review experts also includes step S4), after the steps S1, S2, and S3, a review expert performance evaluation form is formed, which is used for daily/annual performance evaluation of review experts. Enter the average score of each evaluation index of the review work performance and review work quality in the form, and calculate the performance score and performance rank.
有益效果：本发明通过对评审专家的评审工作表现及评审工作质量等方面的评价，完善了对评审专家的绩效评价指标体系，使评审专家的绩效评价管理工作得到规范化管理，还可通过绩效评价结果建立绩效导向的差异化评审专家激励，如评审专家升降机制、差异化的评审报酬。Beneficial effects: the present invention improves the performance evaluation index system for review experts by evaluating the evaluation work performance and review work quality of review experts, so that the performance evaluation management work of review experts can be standardized and managed, and can also pass performance evaluation Results A performance-oriented differentiated review expert incentive was established, such as review expert promotion mechanism and differentiated review remuneration.
附图说明Description of drawings
图1是本发明提供的对评审专家进行绩效评价的步骤。Fig. 1 is the steps of evaluating the performance of review experts provided by the present invention.
图2是本发明提供的评价指标成对比较矩阵的示意图。Fig. 2 is a schematic diagram of the evaluation index pairwise comparison matrix provided by the present invention.
具体实施方式Detailed ways
下面结合附图对本发明的具体实施方式作进一步说明：The specific embodiment of the present invention will be further described below in conjunction with accompanying drawing:
请参阅图1和图2，本实施例提供了对评审专家进行绩效评价的方法，包括以下步骤：Referring to Fig. 1 and Fig. 2, this embodiment provides a method for evaluating the performance of review experts, including the following steps:
S1)选取绩效评价模型的评价指标；S1) selecting the evaluation index of the performance evaluation model;
S2)确定所述评价指标的权重；S2) determining the weight of the evaluation index;
S3)确定所述评价指标的评价标准。S3) Determine the evaluation standard of the evaluation index.
本实施例中，步骤S1包括以下步骤：In this embodiment, step S1 includes the following steps:
S11)通过案头分析初步梳理初始评价指标；S11) Preliminary sorting out the initial evaluation indicators through desk analysis;
S12)通过调研问卷收集意见，对初始评价指标的重要性程度打分；S12) collect opinions through survey questionnaires, and score the importance of the initial evaluation indicators;
S13)筛选重要性程度得分大的指标，形成绩效评价指标体系。S13) Screening indicators with high importance scores to form a performance evaluation indicator system.
本实施例中，绩效评价模型包括评审工作质量和评审工作表现两个子评价指标体系。In this embodiment, the performance evaluation model includes two sub-evaluation index systems of evaluation work quality and evaluation work performance.
本实施例中，步骤S2包括以下步骤：In this embodiment, step S2 includes the following steps:
S21)运用层次分析法，建立评价指标成对比较矩阵；S21) using the AHP to establish a pairwise comparison matrix of evaluation indicators;
S22)将各评价指标成对比较矩阵录入YAAHP软件，计算得出绩效评价指标体系中各评价指标的权重。S22) Enter the pairwise comparison matrix of each evaluation index into the YAAHP software, and calculate the weight of each evaluation index in the performance evaluation index system.
本实施例中，步骤S3包括以下步骤：In this embodiment, step S3 includes the following steps:
S31)区分指标属性，划分为定性评价指标和定量评价指标；S31) Distinguish the attribute of the index, and divide it into a qualitative evaluation index and a quantitative evaluation index;
S32)对于定性评价指标，根据评价指标轻重程度制定评价标准；S32) For the qualitative evaluation index, formulate the evaluation standard according to the severity of the evaluation index;
S33)对于定量评价指标，针对性地选择正态分布法和百分位数法制定评价标准。S33) For the quantitative evaluation index, the normal distribution method and the percentile method are selected to formulate the evaluation standard.
本实施例中，步骤S32是指根据评价指标轻重程度，为每一个定性评价指标设置详细的具有可操作性的衡量等级标准，每个定性评价指标划分10个等级标准，对应1—10分，5分为合格分。In this embodiment, step S32 refers to setting detailed and operable measurement grade standards for each qualitative evaluation index according to the severity of the evaluation index, and each qualitative evaluation index is divided into 10 grade standards, corresponding to 1-10 points, 5 is a passing score.
本实施例中，步骤S33包括以下步骤：In this embodiment, step S33 includes the following steps:
在SPSS软件中将计算出的定量评价指标进行正态拟合，得出置信度为95％的置信区间范围，将该范围定义为评价指标合理范围，不在此范围的数据定义为异常值；In the SPSS software, the calculated quantitative evaluation index is carried out normal fitting, and the confidence interval range with a confidence degree of 95% is obtained, which is defined as the reasonable range of the evaluation index, and the data outside this range are defined as abnormal values;
根据所述定量评价指标值的合理范围和异常范围，按强制比例法划分各等级标准，对应1—10分；According to the reasonable range and abnormal range of the quantitative evaluation index value, each level standard is divided according to the mandatory ratio method, corresponding to 1-10 points;
通过统计分析，得到定量评价指标的合理值及异常值的各等级得分的标准。Through statistical analysis, the reasonable value of the quantitative evaluation index and the standard of each grade score of the abnormal value are obtained.
本实施例中，评审工作表现中的评价指标为定性评价指标，适用于步骤S32，评审工作质量中的评价指标为定量评价指标，适用于步骤S33。In this embodiment, the evaluation index in reviewing work performance is a qualitative evaluation index, applicable to step S32, and the evaluation index in reviewing work quality is a quantitative evaluation index, applicable to step S33.
对评审专家进行绩效评价的方法，进一步包括步骤S4)：经过所述步骤S1、S2、S3后，形成评审专家绩效评价表单，用于对评审专家进行日常/年度绩效评价，在评审专家绩效评价表单中录入评审工作表现和评审工作质量的各评价指标的平均得分，计算得出绩效得分和绩效等次。The method for evaluating the performance of review experts, further comprising step S4): After the steps S1, S2, and S3, a review expert performance evaluation form is formed, which is used for daily/annual performance evaluation of review experts. Enter the average score of each evaluation index of the review work performance and review work quality in the form, and calculate the performance score and performance rank.
本发明通过对评审专家的评审工作表现及评审工作质量等方面的评价，完善了对评审专家的绩效评价指标体系，使评审专家的绩效评价管理工作得到规范化管理，还可通过绩效评价结果建立绩效导向的差异化评审专家激励，如评审专家升降机制、差异化的评审报酬。The present invention perfects the performance evaluation index system for review experts through the evaluation of the evaluation work performance and review work quality of the review experts, so that the performance evaluation management work of the review experts can be standardized, and the performance evaluation results can also be established. Oriented and differentiated review expert incentives, such as review expert promotion mechanism and differentiated review remuneration.
根据上述说明书的揭示和教导，本发明所属领域的技术人员还可以对上述实施方式进行变更和修改。因此，本发明并不局限于上面揭示和描述的具体实施方式，对发明的一些修改和变更也应当落入本发明的权利要求的保护范围内。此外，尽管本说明书中使用了一些特定的术语，但这些术语只是为了方便说明，并不对本发明构成任何限制。According to the disclosure and teaching of the above specification, those skilled in the art to which the present invention pertains can also make changes and modifications to the above embodiment. Therefore, the present invention is not limited to the specific embodiments disclosed and described above, and some modifications and changes to the invention should also fall within the protection scope of the claims of the present invention. In addition, although some specific terms are used in this specification, these terms are only for convenience of description and do not constitute any limitation to the present invention.
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201711192290.4ACN107944704A (en) | 2017-11-24 | 2017-11-24 | Method for evaluating performance of evaluation expert |
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201711192290.4ACN107944704A (en) | 2017-11-24 | 2017-11-24 | Method for evaluating performance of evaluation expert |
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN107944704Atrue CN107944704A (en) | 2018-04-20 |
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201711192290.4APendingCN107944704A (en) | 2017-11-24 | 2017-11-24 | Method for evaluating performance of evaluation expert |
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN107944704A (en) |
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109544022A (en)* | 2018-11-29 | 2019-03-29 | 杭州复杂美科技有限公司 | Suggest motivational techniques, equipment and storage medium |
| CN110189092A (en)* | 2019-04-10 | 2019-08-30 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Method and device for evaluating audit group members |
| CN111222734A (en)* | 2018-11-27 | 2020-06-02 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Emergency management auditing method and system |
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN111222734A (en)* | 2018-11-27 | 2020-06-02 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Emergency management auditing method and system |
| CN109544022A (en)* | 2018-11-29 | 2019-03-29 | 杭州复杂美科技有限公司 | Suggest motivational techniques, equipment and storage medium |
| CN110189092A (en)* | 2019-04-10 | 2019-08-30 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Method and device for evaluating audit group members |
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN103247008B (en) | A kind of method for evaluating quality of electricity statistical index data | |
| CN101710304A (en) | Method for evaluating implementation quality of software process | |
| CN110163675A (en) | A kind of Price Evaluation of Real Estate method and system | |
| CN111639850A (en) | Quality evaluation method and system for multi-source heterogeneous data | |
| CN107909282A (en) | E-government service efficiency evaluation system and method | |
| CN110137947B (en) | A method for evaluating the severity of power grid voltage sags based on ITIC curves | |
| CN110826237B (en) | Wind power equipment reliability analysis method and device based on Bayesian belief network | |
| CN107133719A (en) | A kind of supplier's value assessment method | |
| CN111222790B (en) | Prediction method, device, equipment and storage medium of risk event occurrence probability | |
| CN106502878A (en) | A kind of operation system evaluation methodology and device based on relative maturity | |
| WO2021128523A1 (en) | Technology readiness level determination method and system based on science and technology big data | |
| CN108389069A (en) | Top-tier customer recognition methods based on random forest and logistic regression and device | |
| CN105184078A (en) | Technology maturity evaluation method based on patent relative-quantity analysis | |
| CN107944704A (en) | Method for evaluating performance of evaluation expert | |
| CN114862244A (en) | Comprehensive evaluation method for enterprise quality credit | |
| CN112016858A (en) | Subjective and objective weighting method-based public opinion risk evaluation method | |
| CN106779428A (en) | The interval automatic measurement ＆ calculation method of marking is commented in trick assessment of bids flow in detail | |
| CN110705841A (en) | A safety assessment method for chemical production based on improved fuzzy analytic hierarchy process | |
| CN105824847B (en) | A kind of method for evaluating quality of information integration | |
| CN114118856A (en) | User portrait scoring method, device computer equipment and readable storage medium | |
| CN114612119A (en) | Supplier Risk Early Warning System Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process and Ordered Weighted Operator | |
| CN108876146A (en) | A kind of electric network data class assets management method and system | |
| CN112990501A (en) | Delphi-FCE-based general vehicle equipment maintenance guarantee capability assessment method | |
| CN118297482A (en) | Intelligent power grid design quality review system and method based on big data | |
| JP2015176266A (en) | Administrative risk management system and administrative risk management program |
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| TA01 | Transfer of patent application right | ||
| TA01 | Transfer of patent application right | Effective date of registration:20190306 Address after:510000 No. 11 Kexiang Road, Science City, Luogang District, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province Applicant after:CHINA SOUTHERN POWER GRID Co.,Ltd. Applicant after:China South Power Grid International Co.,Ltd. Address before:510663 3 building, 3, 4, 5 and J1 building, 11 building, No. 11, Ke Xiang Road, Luogang District Science City, Guangzhou, Guangdong. Applicant before:China South Power Grid International Co.,Ltd. | |
| WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication | ||
| WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication | Application publication date:20180420 |