技术领域technical field
本发明涉及教育技术领域，尤其是涉及一种用于实现同伴评价的装置及其应用。The invention relates to the field of education technology, in particular to a device for realizing peer evaluation and its application.
背景技术Background technique
传统的教学主要是老师讲课，学生参与，主要是教师和学生之间的互动，现有的教学评价系统也主要涉及教师评价学生和学生评价教师。同伴教学是哈佛大学埃里克·马祖尔教授提出的现代教学理论，使用专门设计的用于揭示学生概念错误和引导学生深入探究的概念测试题，借助计算机应答交互系统或选项卡片，引导学生参与教学过程，变传统单一的讲授为基于剖析概念的自主学习和合作探究，在大班课堂教学中构建了一种学生自主学习、合作学习、生生互动、师生互动的创新教学模式，并已经在国内外各大高校中推广试点，取得了不错的效果。Traditional teaching is mainly teacher lectures, student participation, mainly the interaction between teachers and students, the existing teaching evaluation system also mainly involves teachers evaluating students and students evaluating teachers. Peer teaching is a modern teaching theory proposed by Professor Eric Mazur of Harvard University. It uses specially designed concept test questions to reveal students' conceptual errors and guide students to explore in depth. With the help of computer response interactive systems or option cards, students are guided to participate In the teaching process, the traditional single lecture is changed into independent learning and cooperative inquiry based on the analysis of concepts, and an innovative teaching mode of independent learning, cooperative learning, student-student interaction, and teacher-student interaction has been constructed in the classroom teaching of large classes. It has been promoted and piloted in major universities at home and abroad, and achieved good results.
同伴教学主要通过分小组的方法，小组成员作为一个集体进行合作学习，小组之间并有横向比较，小组成员的积极参与对小组的成绩有非常重要影响，为了促进小组整体实力提升，需要通过小组内成员相互评价的方法，分析自己的不足和优势，给出对小组成员的分析及建议，特别是给出在小组内的相互评价，通过这样的评价方式，可以让小组成员明白自己对小组的贡献，并能够从其它成员那边获得自己的不足。Peer teaching is mainly through the method of dividing into groups. Group members carry out cooperative learning as a group. There are horizontal comparisons between groups. The active participation of group members has a very important impact on the performance of the group. In order to promote the overall strength of the group, it is necessary to The method of mutual evaluation among members, analyzing their own deficiencies and advantages, giving analysis and suggestions to group members, especially giving mutual evaluation within the group, through this evaluation method, group members can understand their own opinions on the group Contribute and be able to get your own deficiencies from other members.
现有的小组评价方法主要是通过打印评价表，类似学生对教师评价表，在实际评价过程中遇到下面几个方面，课堂现场填写小组评价因为工作量大而且时间紧张质量差，纸质的评价表在收集过程中很容易被小组其它成员看到无法做到匿名，小组内所有成员进行互评，消耗评价表多，事后教师统计和数据录入工作量大，学生无法第一时间得到小组评价的结果，小组同步评价达不到预期效果。The existing group evaluation method mainly prints the evaluation form, which is similar to the student-to-teacher evaluation form. In the actual evaluation process, the following aspects are encountered. Filling out the group evaluation on the spot in the classroom is due to heavy workload and time constraints and poor quality. The evaluation form is easily seen by other members of the group during the collection process and cannot be anonymous. All members in the group conduct mutual evaluation, which consumes a lot of evaluation forms. After the event, the workload of teachers' statistics and data entry is heavy, and students cannot get the group evaluation immediately. As a result, the synchronous evaluation of the group did not achieve the expected effect.
计算机和互联网在教育行业应用越来越广泛，学生通过计算机接入互联网，访问教学网站上的各种应用和工具已经非常广泛，比如专利号200810161007.6提出了一种学习支持系统及其学习评价方法，可以进行自我评价、同学评价和教师评价，可以在学习过程中不断进行评价，并考虑到公平性仅显示网名，且系统能够自动进行公正的评定与分析，生成总评分数，对评价结果进行分析，并提供改进建议，学生也能及时了解自己的评价结果以及改进建议。但是该专利提供的方法还存在如下问题：1、学生评价参考的是其它同学任务完成情况、提出问题及问题答案，而在同伴教学中，是通过划分小组进行教学，小组成员需要一起协同完成任务，需要重点评价的是整个学习过程中小组成员的行为，而不仅仅是最后的结果；2、改进建议也是由系统给出，而同伴学习的建议，需要小组成员相互给出做的好的地方和需要改进的地方，建议包含参与积极性、准备是否充分、是否积极发表建议并参与小组讨论等；3、对于学生的评价建议系统无法识别一些敏感词，需要增加教师检查评价建议环节；4、评价结果分优秀、良好、中等、几个和不及格，不能体现小组内部相对评价，每个学生对小组成员的评价总分为0，需要给出相对表现好和相对表现差的；5、缺少针对小组在班级里面的评价，小组作为一个团队，需要对小组的整体表现进行评价。Computers and the Internet are more and more widely used in the education industry. Students access the Internet through computers and access various applications and tools on teaching websites. For example, Patent No. 200810161007.6 proposes a learning support system and its learning evaluation method. Self-evaluation, classmate evaluation and teacher evaluation can be carried out, and evaluation can be carried out continuously during the learning process, and only the screen name is displayed in consideration of fairness, and the system can automatically perform fair evaluation and analysis, generate total scores, and analyze the evaluation results , and provide improvement suggestions, students can also keep abreast of their own evaluation results and improvement suggestions. However, the method provided by this patent still has the following problems: 1. Students’ evaluation refers to the completion of other students’ tasks, questions and answers to questions, while in peer teaching, teaching is carried out by dividing groups, and group members need to work together to complete tasks , what needs to be evaluated is the behavior of the group members throughout the learning process, not just the final result; 2. Suggestions for improvement are also given by the system, and suggestions for peer learning require group members to give each other good points and areas that need to be improved, suggestions include participation enthusiasm, whether preparation is sufficient, whether actively expressing suggestions and participating in group discussions, etc.; 3. The evaluation and suggestion system for students cannot identify some sensitive words, and teachers need to increase the link of checking, evaluating and suggesting; 4. Evaluation The results are divided into excellent, good, medium, few, and failing, which cannot reflect the relative evaluation within the group. The total score of each student's evaluation of the group members is 0, and it is necessary to give the relative performance and relative performance; 5. Lack of targeted The evaluation of the group in the class. As a team, the group needs to evaluate the overall performance of the group.
另外专利201310550027.3提出了一种支持互动小组合作学习的方法和系统，支持对成员进行分组，确定一个小组内成员信息，提出互动小组合作学习的方法，主要还是针对在线小组学习，提高成员参与在线学习的热情，提高学习效率，但是并没有给出针对小组内学习评估的方法。In addition, patent 201310550027.3 proposes a method and system for supporting interactive group cooperative learning, supports grouping of members, determines member information in a group, and proposes a method for interactive group cooperative learning, mainly for online group learning, and to improve members' participation in online learning Enthusiasm to improve learning efficiency, but does not give a method for learning assessment within the group.
发明内容Contents of the invention
本发明的目的就是为了克服上述现有技术存在的缺陷而提供一种用于实现同伴评价的装置及其应用。The object of the present invention is to provide a device for realizing peer evaluation and its application in order to overcome the above-mentioned defects in the prior art.
本发明的目的可以通过以下技术方案来实现：The purpose of the present invention can be achieved through the following technical solutions:
一种用于实现同伴评价的装置，其特征在于，包括数据库模块、用户管理模块、评价项目管理模块、同步评价模块、报告检查模块和报告查看模块；A device for realizing peer evaluation, characterized in that it includes a database module, a user management module, an evaluation project management module, a synchronous evaluation module, a report checking module and a report viewing module;
所述的数据库模块分别与其他各模块连接，用于保存用户信息、项目信息和评价结果信息；The database module is respectively connected with other modules for storing user information, project information and evaluation result information;
所述的用户管理模块与数据库模块连接，用于实现用户注册和用户管理；The user management module is connected to the database module for realizing user registration and user management;
所述的评价项目管理模块分别与数据库模块、报告检查模块、同步评价模块和报告查看模块连接，用于设定不同的项目供学生通过同伴评价模块完成评价；The evaluation project management module is respectively connected with the database module, the report inspection module, the synchronous evaluation module and the report viewing module, and is used to set different items for students to complete the evaluation through the peer evaluation module;
所述的同伴评价模块分别与数据库模块、报告检查模块、评价项目管理模块和报告查看模块连接，用于提供给用户进行评价的接口；The peer evaluation module is respectively connected with the database module, the report inspection module, the evaluation project management module and the report viewing module, and is used to provide an interface for users to evaluate;
所述的报告检查模块分别与数据库模块、评价项目管理模块和同步评价模块连接，用于完成对用户评价结果的检查，并发布报告；The report inspection module is respectively connected with the database module, the evaluation project management module and the synchronous evaluation module, and is used to complete the inspection of the user evaluation results and issue a report;
所述的报告查看模块分别与数据库模块、同步评价模块、评价项目管理模块和连接，用于供用户查看特定项目的评价报告。The report viewing module is respectively connected with the database module, the synchronous evaluation module, and the evaluation project management module, and is used for the user to view the evaluation report of a specific project.
所述的用户信息包括学校、班级和小组。The user information includes schools, classes and groups.
所述的用户管理包括：对学生、教师和管理员授予权限；班级创建，并分配学生和教师到对应的班级；创建班级下的小组，分配学生到对应的小组。The user management includes: granting permissions to students, teachers and administrators; creating classes and assigning students and teachers to corresponding classes; creating groups under classes and assigning students to corresponding groups.
所述的评价包括成员综合评价、成员相对评价及小组评价。Said evaluation includes member comprehensive evaluation, member relative evaluation and group evaluation.
所述的同伴评价模块在用户完成成员综合评价时，对综合评价的所有项目进行检查，确保所有项目完成填写；若有项目为空，则予以警告并要求用户补正；若均不为空，则保存该成员综合评价。When the user completes the member's comprehensive evaluation, the peer evaluation module checks all the items in the comprehensive evaluation to ensure that all items are filled in; if any item is empty, it will give a warning and ask the user to make corrections; Save this member's overall rating.
所述的成员综合评价包括该成员是否积极、课前准备是否充分、小组讨论是否充分、是否积极完成小组分配的任务并给出意见、是否倾听别人建议并积极改正、该成员做的好的地方和给出该成员需要改进的地方。The comprehensive evaluation of the members includes whether the member is active, whether the preparation before class is sufficient, whether the group discussion is sufficient, whether the task assigned by the group is actively completed and given opinions, whether he listens to other people's suggestions and actively corrects them, and whether the member has done well. And give the member needs to improve.
所述的同伴评价模块在用户完成成员相对评价时，检查所有成员的得分之和是否为0，若不为0，则予以警告并要求用户补正；若为0，则保存该成员相对评价。The peer evaluation module checks whether the sum of the scores of all members is 0 when the user completes the member relative evaluation, if not 0, gives a warning and requires the user to make corrections; if it is 0, saves the member's relative evaluation.
所述报告检查模块对用户评价结果的检查具体为：检查提交评价报告的进度以及检查已提交的报告中是否使用敏感词或者带侮辱性字词。The inspection of the user evaluation results by the report checking module includes: checking the progress of submitting the evaluation report and checking whether sensitive words or insulting words are used in the submitted report.
所述报告查看模块通过两种方式供用户查看评价报告：网页方式和PDF格式输出方式。The report viewing module allows users to view the evaluation report in two ways: web page mode and PDF format output mode.
一种用于实现同伴评价装置的应用，其特征在于，包括以下步骤：An application for implementing a peer evaluation device, characterized in that it comprises the following steps:
(1)搭建同伴评价服务器，管理终端在用户管理模块中创建班级，并将该班级对应的师生用户账号导入数据库模块；(1) Set up a peer evaluation server, the management terminal creates a class in the user management module, and imports the corresponding teacher and student user accounts of the class into the database module;
(2)教师端登陆同伴评价服务器，创建小组，并将学生分配到不同的小组中；(2) The teacher logs in to the peer evaluation server, creates groups, and assigns students to different groups;
(3)教师端从评价项目管理模块创建同伴评价项目，并设定当前学生评价项目和当前教师审查项目；(3) The teacher creates peer evaluation items from the evaluation item management module, and sets the current student evaluation items and current teacher review items;
(4)学生端登陆同伴评价服务器，进入同伴评价模块，查看小组成员，点击不同的小组成员，完成对所有小组成员的成员综合评价，完成后显示成员相对评价按钮；(4) The student terminal logs in to the peer evaluation server, enters the peer evaluation module, checks the group members, clicks on different group members, completes the comprehensive evaluation of all group members, and displays the member relative evaluation button after completion;
(5)学生端点击成员相对评价按钮并进行成员相对评价，保证小组所有成员相对评价和为0后允许提交；(5) On the student side, click the member relative evaluation button and perform a member relative evaluation to ensure that the relative evaluation sum of all members of the group is 0 before allowing submission;
(6)学生端完成小组成员相对评价后，点击小组评价按钮，对小组进行评价并提交；(6) After the students complete the relative evaluation of the group members, click the group evaluation button to evaluate the group and submit it;
(7)教师端登陆同伴评价服务器，从报告检查模块检查每个小组同伴评价完成情况，并检查综合评价中是否包含敏感词句，教师检查修改完毕后，将本次评价项目报告进行发布；(7) The teacher logs in to the peer evaluation server, checks the peer evaluation completion status of each group from the report inspection module, and checks whether sensitive words and sentences are included in the comprehensive evaluation. After the teacher checks and revises, publish the evaluation project report;
(8)学生登陆同伴评价服务器，从报告查看模块查看该项目自己的同伴评价报告。(8) Students log in to the peer evaluation server and view their own peer evaluation reports of the project from the report viewing module.
与现有技术相比，本发明具有以下优点：Compared with the prior art, the present invention has the following advantages:
1、学生可以在课后登陆同伴评价系统进行评价，同伴评价系统通过设定检查条件保证同伴评价质量，小组所有成员评价提交后，教师可以对评价中的敏感词句进行修改并保存数据库，学生看到的最后报告质量好，而且报告中小组成员的表扬和建议随机显示，实现完全匿名，小组成员可以给出中肯的评价。1. Students can log in to the peer evaluation system to evaluate after class. The peer evaluation system ensures the quality of peer evaluation by setting inspection conditions. After all members of the group submit their evaluations, the teacher can modify the sensitive words and sentences in the evaluation and save them in the database. The quality of the final report received is good, and the praise and suggestions of the team members are randomly displayed in the report, which realizes complete anonymity, and the team members can give pertinent evaluations.
2、同伴评价直接是保存到数据库中，只要小组所有成员提交了报告，教师可以直接登陆同伴评价系统进行检查并发布报告，报告中同伴评价结果可以由系统按照预定的算法直接计算，不需要再使用其它的工具进行计算和汇总，比起纸质的同伴评价过程要快，极大的提高了同伴评价的效率，2. The peer evaluation is directly saved in the database. As long as all members of the group submit the report, the teacher can directly log in to the peer evaluation system to check and issue a report. The peer evaluation results in the report can be directly calculated by the system according to the predetermined algorithm, no need to Using other tools for calculation and summarization is faster than the paper-based peer evaluation process, which greatly improves the efficiency of peer evaluation.
3、同伴评价可以课后进行，节省宝贵课堂时间；不需要额外消耗纸质评价表，不需要安排专人进行纸质评价报告收集、汇总、输入、计算。3. Peer evaluation can be done after class, saving valuable classroom time; no need to consume additional paper evaluation forms, and no need to arrange special personnel to collect, summarize, input, and calculate paper evaluation reports.
附图说明Description of drawings
图1是本装置的同伴评价服务器以及管理端、教师端和学生端之间的关系图；Fig. 1 is the relation diagram between the companion evaluation server of this device and management end, teacher's end and student's end;
图2是本装置的同伴评价服务器上主要模块及模块间关系；Fig. 2 is the main module and the relationship between the modules on the companion evaluation server of this device;
图3是学生登陆同伴评价服务器显示界面处理流程。Figure 3 is the processing flow of the display interface for students to log in to the peer evaluation server.
具体实施方式Detailed ways
下面结合附图和具体实施例对本发明进行详细说明。The present invention will be described in detail below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and specific embodiments.
实施例1Example 1
同伴评价服务器11包含后台系统和前台系统，后台系统由数据库模块21、用户管理模块22构成，前台系统由评价项目管理模块23、同步评价模块24、报告检查模块25和报告查看模块26构成，学生12、教师13和管理员14均通过互联网连接到本装置，如图1所示。Companion evaluation server 11 comprises background system and foreground system, and background system is made of database module 21, user management module 22, and foreground system is made of evaluation item management module 23, synchronous evaluation module 24, report checking module 25 and report checking module 26, and students 12. Both the teacher 13 and the administrator 14 are connected to the device through the Internet, as shown in FIG. 1 .
数据库模块21，用于保存所有学校、班级、小组、项目信息，还用于保存所有同伴评价表，保存所有小组评价表，保存所有成员同伴评价综合得分结果，和所有其它模块都有交互。The database module 21 is used to save all school, class, group, project information, and is also used to save all peer evaluation tables, all group evaluation tables, and all member peer evaluation comprehensive score results, and interacts with all other modules.
用户管理模块22，支持通过姓名和邮箱进行用户注册，管理员给新注册的用户授予学生、教师和管理员等不同权限；支持创建班级，将学生和教师分配到对应的班级；支持创建班级下属的各个小组，方便教师将班级中学生分配到不同的小组中，并能根据实际课堂上的分组情况及时调整。The user management module 22 supports user registration by name and email address, and the administrator grants different permissions to newly registered users such as students, teachers, and administrators; supports the creation of classes, and assigns students and teachers to corresponding classes; supports the creation of class subordinates It is convenient for teachers to assign students in the class to different groups, and it can be adjusted in time according to the actual grouping situation in the classroom.
评价项目管理模块23，主要是教师创建本班级新的待评估项目，教师可以设定当前评价项目，设定当前审查项目，设定班级成员可以查阅评价报告项目，所有同伴评价都是针对特定的项目评估小组成员在该项目中的表现。The evaluation project management module 23 is mainly for the teacher to create new items to be evaluated in the class. The teacher can set the current evaluation items, set the current review items, and set the class members to view the evaluation report items. All peer evaluations are for specific The project evaluates the performance of the team members on the project.
同伴评价模块24，包括成员综合评价、成员相对评价及小组评价。成员综合评价主要是让学生对小组内每名成员包括自己进行定性的评价，主要评价小组成员参与小组活动是否积极、课前准备是否充分、小组讨论是否充分、是否积极完成小组分配的任务并给出意见、是否倾听别人建议并积极改正、给出小组成员做的好的地方、给出小组成员需要改进的地方等。成员评价表提交时进行检查，确保所有必须填写项目都已经填写；成员相对评价主要是让学生给出小组内所有成员的相对评价，评价包括-3、-2、-1、0、1、2、3，默认值为0，评价范围也可以增加或者缩小，需要保证所有成员的评价得分和为0，在小组成员提交相对评价的时候进行检查，如果和不为0不允许提交，评价分数为正指成员对小组是正面积极的，表现相对好的，负分数表示表现相对差；小组评价主要是让学生评价本小组作为一个整体在某个项目中综合表现，评价值范围为0、1、2、3，也可以增加或者缩小，默认值为0，分数高，说明小组成员认为自己小组在这个项目中综合表现更好。The peer evaluation module 24 includes member comprehensive evaluation, member relative evaluation and group evaluation. The comprehensive evaluation of members mainly allows students to make a qualitative evaluation of each member in the group, including themselves. It mainly evaluates whether the group members actively participate in group activities, whether the pre-class preparation is sufficient, whether the group discussion is sufficient, whether they actively complete the tasks assigned by the group and give feedback. Give opinions, whether to listen to other people's suggestions and actively correct them, give what the team members have done well, and give what the team members need to improve, etc. When submitting the member evaluation form, check to ensure that all required items have been filled in; the relative evaluation of members mainly allows students to give relative evaluations of all members in the group, including -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2 , 3, the default value is 0, and the evaluation range can also be increased or reduced. It is necessary to ensure that the sum of the evaluation scores of all members is 0, and check when the group members submit relative evaluations. If the sum is not 0, the submission is not allowed, and the evaluation score is Positive means that members are positive to the group and perform relatively well, and negative scores indicate relatively poor performance; group evaluation mainly allows students to evaluate the overall performance of the group as a whole in a certain project, and the evaluation value ranges from 0, 1, 2 and 3 can also be increased or decreased. The default value is 0, and a high score indicates that the team members think that their team has a better overall performance in this project.
报告检查模块25，主要是让教师对当前评价项目中所有成员提交的报告进行检查，主要检查小组成员是否已经提交报告，检查提交的报告中是否使用一些敏感性或者带侮辱性字词。The report checking module 25 mainly allows the teacher to check the reports submitted by all members of the current evaluation project, mainly check whether the team members have submitted reports, and check whether some sensitive or insulting words are used in the submitted reports.
报告查看模块26，主要是让学生查询自己特定项目的同伴评价包括，通过查询数据库中相关评价内容，计算该学生的相对得分并在网页上显示，并将小组成员的评价和建议随机显示在网页上，同时支持PDF(Portable Document Format，便携文档格式)格式报告输出，方便保存和邮件发送到学生自己的邮箱。教师可以查询班级所有成员特定项目的报告。The report viewing module 26 mainly allows students to inquire about peer evaluations of their specific projects, including calculating the relative score of the student and displaying it on the web page by querying the relevant evaluation content in the database, and randomly displaying the evaluations and suggestions of group members on the web page At the same time, it supports PDF (Portable Document Format, portable document format) format report output, which is convenient for saving and sending emails to students' own mailboxes. Teachers can query reports for a specific project for all members of the class.
各个模块之间关系如图2所示。数据库模块21和用户管理模块22是同伴评价方法中的基础模块；评价项目管理模块23设定不同的项目，以方便学生通过同伴评价模块24完成同伴评价及小组评价操作；报告检查模块25完成对学生同伴评价检查，并发布报告；学生和教师通过报告查看模块26查看最后产生的小组成员的同伴评价报告，共同构成一个完整的同伴评价技术方案流程。The relationship between each module is shown in Figure 2. The database module 21 and the user management module 22 are basic modules in the peer evaluation method; the evaluation project management module 23 sets different items to facilitate students to complete peer evaluation and group evaluation operations through the peer evaluation module 24; the report inspection module 25 completes the evaluation The students' peer evaluation is checked and a report is released; students and teachers check the final peer evaluation report of the team members through the report viewing module 26, which together constitute a complete peer evaluation technical program process.
以下为本发明装置的具体工作原理：The following is the specific working principle of the device of the present invention:
第一步，搭建同伴评价服务器，提供互联网HTTP(Hypertext transfer protocol，超文本传输协议)服务，管理员通过互联网终端登陆同伴评价服务器，创建新班级，导入该班级的学生和教师名单并创建用户账号，设定用户账号的学生和教师角色，并激活账号，通知学生和教师登陆系统参与同伴评价。The first step is to build a peer evaluation server and provide Internet HTTP (Hypertext transfer protocol, hypertext transfer protocol) services. The administrator logs in to the peer evaluation server through an Internet terminal, creates a new class, imports the list of students and teachers in this class and creates a user account , set the student and teacher roles of the user account, activate the account, and notify the students and teachers to log in to the system to participate in peer evaluation.
第二步，教师通过互联网终端登陆同伴评价服务器，创建小组，并将班级学生分配到不同的小组中。也可以对现有小组成员进行调整。In the second step, the teacher logs into the peer evaluation server through the Internet terminal, creates a group, and assigns the class students to different groups. Adjustments can also be made to existing group members.
第三步，教师创建同伴评价项目，并设定当前学生评价项目和当前教师审查项目。In the third step, the teacher creates peer evaluation items, and sets current student evaluation items and current teacher review items.
第四步，学生通过互联网终端登陆同伴评价服务器，查看小组成员，点击不同的小组成员，完成对所有小组成员的成员综合评价，在小组综合评价全部提交完毕后，显示成员相对评价按钮。In the fourth step, students log in to the peer evaluation server through the Internet terminal, check the group members, and click on different group members to complete the comprehensive evaluation of all group members. After all the group comprehensive evaluations are submitted, the relative evaluation button of the members is displayed.
第五步，学生完成所有成员综合评价提交后，点击成员相对评价按钮，完成对小组所有成员的评价，保证小组所有成员相对评价和为0后允许提交。如果学生不进行这个步骤，则默认对小组所有成员的相对评价为0。Step 5: After the students submit the comprehensive evaluation of all members, click the member relative evaluation button to complete the evaluation of all members of the group, and ensure that the relative evaluation sum of all members of the group is 0 before allowing submission. If the student does not perform this step, the relative evaluation of all members of the group will be 0 by default.
第六步，学生完成小组成员相对评价后，点击小组评价按钮，对小组进行评价并提交。如果学生不进行这个步骤，则默认对小组评价为0。Step 6: After the students complete the relative evaluation of the group members, click the group evaluation button to evaluate the group and submit it. If the student does not perform this step, the default evaluation for the group is 0.
第七步，教师通过互联网终端登陆同伴评价服务器，检查每个小组同伴评价完成情况，并检查综合评价中是否包含过敏词句，教师检查修改完毕后，将本次评价项目报告进行发布，并关闭对本项目继续评价，避免报告发布后，学生再修改同伴综合评价或者相对评价。Step 7: The teacher logs in to the peer evaluation server through the Internet terminal, checks the completion of each group peer evaluation, and checks whether the comprehensive evaluation contains allergic words and sentences. After the teacher checks and modifies, publish the evaluation project report and close the The project continues to be evaluated to avoid students revising peer comprehensive evaluation or relative evaluation after the report is released.
第八步，学生收到通知后通过互联网终端登陆同伴评价服务器，击发布的项目，查看该项目自己的同伴评价报告，点击PDF格式按钮可以显示PDF格式的评价报告，将报告本地保存或者邮件发送到自己邮箱。Step 8: After receiving the notification, the students log in to the peer evaluation server through the Internet terminal, click the published project, and view the peer evaluation report of the project, click the PDF format button to display the evaluation report in PDF format, and save the report locally or send it by email to your mailbox.
同一个班级下一轮的同伴评价可以从上述第二步开始，教师通过互联网终端登陆同伴评价服务器，根据新一轮同伴学习的小组划分情况对数据库中小组成员进行调整，然后继续后面步骤。在步骤四中，学生登陆后，除了可以进行新一轮的评价，还可以查看上一轮的评价报告。参考图3所示。The next round of peer evaluation in the same class can start from the second step above. The teacher logs in to the peer evaluation server through the Internet terminal, adjusts the group members in the database according to the group division of the new round of peer learning, and then continues to the following steps. In Step 4, after logging in, students can not only conduct a new round of evaluation, but also view the evaluation report of the previous round. Refer to Figure 3.
实施例2Example 2
本实施硬件模块部分主要包括同伴评价服务器，本实施例中同伴评价服务器使用了哈佛大学一个公共服务器，运行Linux操作系统，接入因特网，支持HTTP服务，并支持PHP(Hypertext Preprocessor，超文本预处理器)动态网页技术，支持MySQL(关系型数据库管理系统)数据库；学生、教师和管理员通过接入互联网的电脑登陆同伴评价服务器。This implementation hardware module part mainly comprises peer evaluation server, peer evaluation server has used a public server of Harvard University in the present embodiment, runs Linux operating system, inserts Internet, supports HTTP service, and supports PHP (Hypertext Preprocessor, hypertext preprocessing Device) dynamic web page technology, supporting MySQL (relational database management system) database; students, teachers and administrators log in to the peer evaluation server through computers connected to the Internet.
主要实施步骤如下：The main implementation steps are as follows:
步骤一、在服务器上安装好Drupal(一个开源的内容管理发布系统)核心模块，并配置好MySQL数据库使用，使用管理员登陆Drupal系统后，安装视图增强、结构引用、日期增强等功能模块，并增加学生、教师和管理员三个角色，并创建新的结构类型，包括班级、小组、评价项目、同伴评价、小组评价，其中班级结构中主要包含班级名称和班级编号，可以支持多个班级同时使用同伴评价系统。Step 1. Install the Drupal (an open source content management publishing system) core module on the server, and configure the MySQL database for use. After logging in to the Drupal system as an administrator, install functional modules such as view enhancement, structure reference, and date enhancement, and Add three roles of students, teachers, and administrators, and create new structure types, including classes, groups, evaluation items, peer evaluations, and group evaluations. The class structure mainly includes class names and class numbers, which can support multiple classes at the same time Use a peer rating system.
其中小组结构中包含小组名称、小组编号以及一个指向班级的字段，以区分不同班级下的小组。The group structure includes group name, group number and a field pointing to class to distinguish groups under different classes.
其中评价项目结构中包含项目名称，项目编号，项目起止日期，包含当前项目标记、检查项目标记、发布项目标记三个标记，用于指明该项目是否是当前评价项目，是否是教师当前检查项目，是否是已经发布的项目，同时评价项目中包含一个指向班级的字段，用于区分不同班级。The evaluation project structure includes project name, project number, project start and end date, including three marks of current project mark, inspection project mark and release project mark, which are used to indicate whether the project is the current evaluation project, whether it is the teacher's current inspection project, Whether it is a published project, and the evaluation project contains a field pointing to the class, which is used to distinguish different classes.
同伴评价结构是本专利核心结构，包含同伴评价名称、指向项目结构字段、指向小组结构字段、指向小组成员字段、综合评价字段(包含小组成员参与小组活动是否积极、课前准备是否充分、小组讨论是否充分、是否积极完成小组分配的任务并给出意见、是否倾听别人建议并积极改正、给出小组成员做的好的地方、给出小组成员需要改进的地方)、相对评价字段。The peer evaluation structure is the core structure of this patent, including peer evaluation name, project structure field, group structure field, group member field, and comprehensive evaluation field (including whether the group members actively participate in group activities, whether the pre-class preparation is sufficient, group discussion Whether it is sufficient, whether it actively completes the tasks assigned by the group and gives opinions, whether it listens to other people's suggestions and actively corrects them, gives what the team members have done well, and gives what the team members need to improve), relative evaluation fields.
小组评价结构包含名称，指向项目结构字段、指向小组结构字段、指向评价人员结构字段以及评价得分字段。The team review structure contains a name, a pointer to project structure field, a pointer to team structure field, a pointer to evaluator structure field, and a review score field.
使用Drupal的用户导入功能，将编辑好的班级成员用户导入，包含成员姓名、邮箱、班级号、角色，将导入用户激活，并给所有导入用户邮箱发送首次登陆链接，通知相关人员登录同伴评价系统，并在第一次登陆的时候设定用户密码。Use the user import function of Drupal to import the edited class member users, including member names, email addresses, class numbers, and roles, activate the imported users, and send the first login link to all imported user email addresses to notify relevant personnel to log in to the peer evaluation system , and set the user password when logging in for the first time.
步骤二、教师首次使用邮箱中新激活的链接登陆，根据Drupal要求设定密码，创建新的多个小组，并使用Drupal提供视图显示及过滤功能，通过设置过滤条件，比对每个用户班级字段和登陆教师班级字段，确保教师仅显示本班级的成员。使用Drupal提供的可编辑表模块，对本班级成员的小组进行修改，将成员加入到不同的小组中。Step 2. For the first time, the teacher uses the newly activated link in the mailbox to log in, set a password according to Drupal requirements, create multiple new groups, and use Drupal to provide view display and filtering functions. By setting filter conditions, compare the class fields of each user and Login to the teacher's class field to ensure that the teacher only shows members of this class. Use the editable table module provided by Drupal to modify the groups of members of this class and add members to different groups.
步骤三、教师创建多个评价项目，设定好不同评价项目起止日期，同样利用Drupal提供的视图显示及过滤功能，通过设置过滤条件，比对每个项目班级字段和登陆教师班级字段，显示当前班级所有项目。使用Drupal提供的可编辑表模块把当前日期的评价项目设定为当前同伴评价项目以及当前教师检查项目。Step 3. The teacher creates multiple evaluation items, sets the start and end dates of different evaluation items, and also uses the view display and filtering functions provided by Drupal to set filter conditions, compare the class field of each item with the class field of the login teacher, and display the current All items of the class. Use the editable table module provided by Drupal to set the current date's evaluation item as the current peer evaluation item and the current teacher inspection item.
步骤四、学生首次使用邮箱中新激活的链接登陆，根据Drupal要求设定密码，然后显示所有小组成员，也利用Drupal提供的视图显示和过滤功能，通过设置过滤条件，比对每个用户的班级和小组字段，仅显示和登陆学生同样班级和小组的成员，Drupal视图支持PHP代码，在显示小组成员的时候，检查一下数据库中本班级时候设置了当前评价项目，如果设置了当前评价项目，则给每个小组成员名字增加一个链接，通过PHP代码检查数据库中是否有对这个小组成员的评价信息，如果没有则指向新建同伴评价链接，如果有，则指向更新同伴评价链接，保证学生可以实时保存同步评价信息。如果数据库中没有当前评价项目设置，则提示学生等待小组评价，不给每个小组成员名字增加链接。另外，如果显示的小组成员名字和登陆的学生名字一致，在成员名字后面使用红色字体增加一个备注，注明是自己。处理流程见图3所示。Step 4: For the first time, students use the newly activated link in the mailbox to log in, set a password according to Drupal's requirements, and then display all group members, and use the view display and filtering functions provided by Drupal to compare each user's class by setting filter conditions In the group field, only members of the same class and group as the logged-in student are displayed. The Drupal view supports PHP code. When displaying group members, check the current evaluation item set in the class in the database. If the current evaluation item is set, then Add a link to the name of each group member, check whether there is evaluation information for this group member in the database through PHP code, if not, point to the new peer evaluation link, if yes, point to the update peer evaluation link, to ensure that students can save it in real time Synchronize rating information. If there is no current evaluation item setting in the database, the student is prompted to wait for the group evaluation, and no link is added to the name of each group member. In addition, if the name of the displayed group member is the same as the name of the student who logged in, add a note in red font after the name of the member, indicating that it is yourself. The processing flow is shown in Figure 3.
在新建或者更新同伴评价页面中，学生可以针对小组同伴进行详细的综合评价，其中小组成员参与小组活动是否积极、课前准备是否充分、小组讨论是否充分、是否积极完成小组分配的任务并给出意见、是否倾听别人建议并积极改正通过单项选择方式进行评价，对于给出小组成员做的好的地方、给出小组成员需要改进的地方需要支持文本录入，并通过网页内嵌Javascript在提交综合评价的时候进行合法性检查，确保完成所有的内容，并提醒学生遗漏了哪些评价内容。In the new or updated peer evaluation page, students can make a detailed comprehensive evaluation of the group peers, including whether the group members actively participate in the group activities, whether the pre-class preparation is sufficient, whether the group discussion is sufficient, whether they actively complete the tasks assigned by the group and give feedback. Opinions, whether to listen to other people’s suggestions and actively correct them are evaluated through single-item selection. For the good points of the team members and the areas that the team members need to improve, it is necessary to support text entry, and submit a comprehensive evaluation through the embedded Javascript on the webpage Do a legitimacy check at the time to make sure everything is complete and remind students what was missing from the assessment.
步骤五、学生每完成一个小组成员评价后，使用PHP代码检查一下是否完成所有成员的评价，如果所有小组成员综合评价已经完成，则增加显示进行小组相对评价的链接，同样利用Drupal提供的视图过滤以及可编辑表功能，实现所有小组成员的相对评价，通过单项选择的方式为小组成员给出-3到3的评价。保存的时候使用PHP代码检查所有成员的相对评价和是否为0，如果不为0，则用红字给出提示，并给出和。对于给小组所有成员都是0分的情况也给出提醒，通过检查后，给出完成相对评价的按钮，学生点击完成提交按钮后，纪录该学生已经完成相对评价，方便教师检查。Step 5. After students complete the evaluation of a group member, use PHP code to check whether the evaluation of all members has been completed. If the comprehensive evaluation of all group members has been completed, add a link to display the relative evaluation of the group. Also use the view filter provided by Drupal As well as the editable table function, realize the relative evaluation of all group members, and give the group members an evaluation of -3 to 3 by means of single selection. When saving, use PHP code to check whether the relative evaluation sum of all members is 0, if it is not 0, give a hint in red and give the sum. A reminder is also given to all members of the group with 0 points. After passing the inspection, a button to complete the relative evaluation is given. After the student clicks the button to complete the submission, it will be recorded that the student has completed the relative evaluation, which is convenient for the teacher to check.
步骤六、学生完成相对评价后，通过PHP代码检查核实后，增加小组评价链接，学生点击进行小组评价，首次点击小组评价，通过PHP代码检查数据库中是否已经有本项目本学生小组评价内容，如果没有，则利用PHP代码提供Drupal的接口函数创建一个小组评价记录，并通过Druapl提供的可编辑表模块对新创建的小组评价进行修改，学生对小组评价也是通过单项选择方法，可以选择0到3，默认值为0，点击提交后保存对小组评价结果，其中小组评价中一些字段，比如指向项目结构字段、指向小组结构字段、指向评价人员结构字段都通过PHP代码获取本登陆学生的信息设置好值，是的学生仅需要输入小组评价分数即可。Step 6. After the students complete the relative evaluation, after checking and verifying through the PHP code, add the group evaluation link, and the student clicks on the group evaluation, clicks the group evaluation for the first time, and checks whether the student group evaluation content of this project already exists in the database through the PHP code. If If not, use the PHP code to provide Drupal interface functions to create a group evaluation record, and modify the newly created group evaluation through the editable table module provided by Drupal. Students also use a single selection method for group evaluation, and can choose from 0 to 3 , the default value is 0, click submit to save the group evaluation results, and some fields in the group evaluation, such as pointing to the project structure field, pointing to the group structure field, and pointing to the evaluator structure field, are all set through the PHP code to obtain the information of the logged-in students Value, Yes Students only need to enter group assessment scores.
步骤七、教师在项目评价周期结束前登陆同伴评价系统对所有小组的同伴评价提交情况进行检查。首先检查小组提交情况，通过Drupal提供的视图及过滤功能，显示所有同伴评价内容，并过滤项目字段是否指向当前评价项目，过滤指向小组字段是否为当前检查小组进行过滤，仅显示指定小组当前项目所有同伴评价内容，并通过PHP代码查询数据库中当前小组的所有相对评价内容，检查每个小组成员是否完成相对评价提交，相对评价结果是否为0，如果有异常，则通过加粗红色字体显示出来，方便教师提醒特定小组成员尽快完成同伴评价。对于已经完成提交的小组，按照设定好的算法计算小组中每个成员的得分，并将结果通过网页显示出来，方便教师检查最后的同伴评价结果是否合理。Step 7. The teacher logs into the peer evaluation system to check the peer evaluation submissions of all groups before the end of the project evaluation cycle. First, check the submission status of the group. Through the view and filtering functions provided by Drupal, display all peer evaluation content, and filter whether the item field points to the current evaluation item, filter whether the group field is the current inspection group, and only display all the current items of the specified group. Peer evaluation content, and query all relative evaluation content of the current group in the database through PHP code, check whether each group member has completed the relative evaluation submission, whether the relative evaluation result is 0, if there is any abnormality, it will be displayed in bold red font, Allows teachers to remind specific group members to complete peer assessments as soon as possible. For the groups that have completed the submission, calculate the score of each member in the group according to the set algorithm, and display the results on the webpage, so that teachers can check whether the final peer evaluation results are reasonable.
小组相对评价检查完毕后，教师再检查所有小组成员提交的同伴评价报告中“给出小组成员做的好的地方”字段及“给出小组成员需要改进的地方”字段中是否包含敏感词句。通过Drupal提供的视图显示及过滤功能，显示所有用户报告中这2个字段内容，过滤项目字段是否指向当前评价项目，过滤指向小组字段是否为当前检查小组进行过滤，仅显示指定小组当前项目所有“给出小组成员做的好的地方”字段及“给出小组成员需要改进的地方”字段内容，并利用可编辑表模块实现对敏感性字词修改并保存。After the relative evaluation of the group is checked, the teacher checks whether there are sensitive words or sentences in the fields of "give what the group members have done well" and "give what the group members need to improve" in the peer evaluation reports submitted by all group members. Through the view display and filtering function provided by Drupal, display the content of these two fields in all user reports, filter whether the project field points to the current evaluation project, filter whether the group field is the current inspection group, and only display the current project of the specified group. Give the team members what they did well" field and the "Give team members what they need to improve" field content, and use the editable table module to modify and save sensitive words.
教师完成所有检查后，把当前项目设置为评价报告发布，并通过Drupal的邮件系统给所有成员发邮件通知同伴评价报告已经发布，将当前评价项目设置为下一个项目，或者直接关闭当前评价项目设置，避免学生对已经发布报告的项目再进行修改。After the teacher completes all the checks, set the current item as the evaluation report release, and send an email to all members through the Drupal mail system to notify the peers that the evaluation report has been released, set the current evaluation item as the next item, or directly close the current evaluation item setting , to prevent students from revising the projects that have already been reported.
步骤八、学生重新登录同伴评价系统中，PHP代码会检查该学生是否有已经发布的项目，如果有的话，则增加显示及连接。学生点击该连接，会对连接输入的参数进行检查，确定输入的项目编号以及是发布状态，避免学生非法修改连接，显示没有发布的项目的同伴评价报告。该报告显示自己对每个小组成员提交的相对评价分数，以及其它成员对这个成员的相对评价分数平均值，用于比较自己的相对评价是否准确。显示自己对小组的评价以及其它成员对小组评价的平局分，用于比较自己对小组评价是否准确。并根据所有相对评价分数计算到本次项目自己的综合得分，得分依赖于三个方面，首先是别人对自己的评价，另外是对自己评价的准确性，以及对小组其它成员评价的准确性。另外，同伴评价报告还包括小组成员对自己的表扬和建议，表扬和建议随机显示，实现匿名效果。利用Drupal提供的PDF视图，可以把同伴评价报告显示为PDF格式的，显示内容和网页格式的一致，方便保存到本地或者发到自己的邮箱。Step 8: The student logs into the peer evaluation system again, and the PHP code will check whether the student has published projects, and if so, add display and links. When students click on the link, they will check the input parameters of the link, determine the input item number and release status, prevent students from illegally modifying the link, and display peer evaluation reports for unpublished items. The report shows the relative evaluation score submitted by each group member and the average relative evaluation score of other members to this member, which is used to compare whether the relative evaluation of oneself is accurate. Display your own evaluation of the group and the tie score of other members' evaluations on the group, which is used to compare whether your own evaluation of the group is accurate. And based on all the relative evaluation scores, the overall score of this project is calculated. The score depends on three aspects, first of all, other people's evaluation of oneself, and the accuracy of evaluation of oneself, and the accuracy of evaluation of other members of the group. In addition, the peer evaluation report also includes the praise and suggestions of the group members, which are randomly displayed to achieve an anonymous effect. Using the PDF view provided by Drupal, you can display the peer evaluation report in PDF format, and the display content is consistent with the web page format, which is convenient to save locally or send to your own mailbox.
上述实现步骤是充分利用开源Drupal功能实现的，其它的动态网页技术也都可以实现，使用其它类型的数据库也能达到同样的效果。因此，本发明不限于这里的实施例，本领域技术人员根据本发明的揭示，不脱离本发明的范畴所做出的改进和修改都应该在本发明的保护范围之内。The above implementation steps are realized by making full use of the open source Drupal function, and other dynamic web page technologies can also be implemented, and the same effect can be achieved by using other types of databases. Therefore, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments herein. Improvements and modifications made by those skilled in the art according to the disclosure of the present invention without departing from the scope of the present invention should fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201510063727.9ACN104680450A (en) | 2015-02-06 | 2015-02-06 | Peer assessment device and application thereof |
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201510063727.9ACN104680450A (en) | 2015-02-06 | 2015-02-06 | Peer assessment device and application thereof |
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN104680450Atrue CN104680450A (en) | 2015-06-03 |
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201510063727.9APendingCN104680450A (en) | 2015-02-06 | 2015-02-06 | Peer assessment device and application thereof |
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN104680450A (en) |
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN105894879A (en)* | 2016-06-30 | 2016-08-24 | 苏州科大讯飞教育科技有限公司 | Auxiliary teaching system and method |
| CN106327924A (en)* | 2015-06-24 | 2017-01-11 | 福建天晴数码有限公司 | Intelligent classroom realization method and system |
| CN107146006A (en)* | 2017-04-25 | 2017-09-08 | 北京文华在线教育科技股份有限公司 | Online course user job mutually comments intelligent distribution, evaluation method and system |
| CN107153919A (en)* | 2017-05-09 | 2017-09-12 | 常熟理工学院 | A kind of online anonymous assessment method |
| CN107481172A (en)* | 2017-08-31 | 2017-12-15 | 山东财经大学 | Interactive job management method and system based on wechat public platform |
| CN110147964A (en)* | 2019-05-24 | 2019-08-20 | 焦作大学 | Talent evaluation system based on big data technology |
| CN112559873A (en)* | 2020-12-21 | 2021-03-26 | 周欢 | User recommendation system based on intelligent education |
| CN113610679A (en)* | 2021-08-06 | 2021-11-05 | 四川牛阶科技有限责任公司 | Online learning method and system based on supervision constraint |
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20120310696A1 (en)* | 2008-07-09 | 2012-12-06 | Learning Sciences International | Performance observation, tracking and improvement system and method |
| CN103337008A (en)* | 2013-06-09 | 2013-10-02 | 青岛农业大学 | Comprehensive assessment system for undergraduates in colleges and universities |
| US20140344271A1 (en)* | 2011-09-29 | 2014-11-20 | Shl Group Ltd | Requirements characterisation |
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20120310696A1 (en)* | 2008-07-09 | 2012-12-06 | Learning Sciences International | Performance observation, tracking and improvement system and method |
| US20140344271A1 (en)* | 2011-09-29 | 2014-11-20 | Shl Group Ltd | Requirements characterisation |
| CN103337008A (en)* | 2013-06-09 | 2013-10-02 | 青岛农业大学 | Comprehensive assessment system for undergraduates in colleges and universities |
| Title |
|---|
| 刘洋 等: ""基于同伴评价的研究型课程考核方法研究"", 《计算机教育》* |
| 王彦群: ""网络学习的发展性评价系统的研究与设计"", 《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库 社会科学II辑》* |
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN106327924A (en)* | 2015-06-24 | 2017-01-11 | 福建天晴数码有限公司 | Intelligent classroom realization method and system |
| CN105894879A (en)* | 2016-06-30 | 2016-08-24 | 苏州科大讯飞教育科技有限公司 | Auxiliary teaching system and method |
| CN107146006A (en)* | 2017-04-25 | 2017-09-08 | 北京文华在线教育科技股份有限公司 | Online course user job mutually comments intelligent distribution, evaluation method and system |
| CN107153919A (en)* | 2017-05-09 | 2017-09-12 | 常熟理工学院 | A kind of online anonymous assessment method |
| CN107481172A (en)* | 2017-08-31 | 2017-12-15 | 山东财经大学 | Interactive job management method and system based on wechat public platform |
| CN110147964A (en)* | 2019-05-24 | 2019-08-20 | 焦作大学 | Talent evaluation system based on big data technology |
| CN112559873A (en)* | 2020-12-21 | 2021-03-26 | 周欢 | User recommendation system based on intelligent education |
| CN112559873B (en)* | 2020-12-21 | 2021-08-13 | 融易学控股(深圳)有限公司 | User recommendation system based on intelligent education |
| CN113610679A (en)* | 2021-08-06 | 2021-11-05 | 四川牛阶科技有限责任公司 | Online learning method and system based on supervision constraint |
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN104680450A (en) | Peer assessment device and application thereof | |
| Beddoe et al. | Towards an international consensus on a research agenda for social work supervision: Report on the first survey of a Delphi study | |
| Brand et al. | “I teach it because it is the biggest threat to health”: integrating sustainable healthcare into health professions education | |
| CN102750139B (en) | A kind of online course editing system and a kind of method for creating online course | |
| Lin | SCIENCE AND NON-SCIENCE UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS’CRITICAL THINKING AND ARGUMENTATION PERFORMANCE IN READING A SCIENCE NEWS REPORT | |
| Hsu | Developing a scale for teacher integration of information and communication technology in grades 1–9 | |
| Severin et al. | Overburdening of peer reviewers: A multi‐stakeholder perspective on causes and effects | |
| Li et al. | Effects of the Positive Action programme on problem behaviours in elementary school students: A matched-pair randomised control trial in Chicago | |
| Gomes et al. | The development and impact of a social media and professionalism course for medical students | |
| Simpson | Superintendent tenure and student achievement. | |
| MacGillivray et al. | Understanding evaluation of learning support in mathematics and statistics | |
| Noltemeyer et al. | Evaluating and celebrating PBIS success: Development and implementation of Ohio's PBIS recognition system | |
| Hramiak | Online learning community development with teachers as a means of enhancing initial teacher training | |
| Feinstein et al. | When does a nation-level analysis make sense? ESD and educational governance in Brazil, South Africa, and the USA | |
| Burns et al. | Evaluation of the implementation of a relationship and sexuality education project in Western Australian schools: Protocol of a multiple, embedded case study | |
| Allen et al. | Peers and partners: working together to strengthen preceptorship in mental health nursing | |
| Bazargan | Problems of organising and reporting internal and external evaluation in developing countries: the case of Iran | |
| Bradford et al. | Healthy relationship education: A statewide initiative case study and outcome evaluation | |
| Joyce et al. | Working together: the positive effects of introducing formal teams in a first year Engineering degree | |
| Morrell | Use of feed-forward mechanisms in a novel research-led module | |
| Coats et al. | Scoping Review of Workplace Mental Health and Well-being Programs in Higher Education Institutions | |
| CN104461475A (en) | Course editing system for online teaching and course creating method for online teaching | |
| Adams et al. | Building a learning collaborative | |
| Sarlan et al. | Student industrial internship web portal | |
| CN108269022B (en) | ERP skill automatic evaluation method and device supporting multi-strategy operation |
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication | Application publication date:20150603 | |
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |