




技术领域:Technical field:
本发明涉及电力系统可靠性评估技术领域,尤其是一种±800kV换流站主接线可靠性评估方法。The invention relates to the technical field of power system reliability evaluation, in particular to a method for evaluating the reliability of a main wiring of a ±800kV converter station.
背景技术:Background technique:
由于国内状态检修技术的大力发展,元件的状态检修状态已经成为元件状态转换中不可或缺的一个状态,而在经典元件四状态模型中,并没有计及元件的状态检修状态,因此认为经典元件四状态模型已经不符合元件状态转换的实际情况。Due to the vigorous development of domestic condition-based maintenance technology, the condition-based maintenance state of components has become an indispensable state in component state transitions. However, in the classic component four-state model, the condition-based maintenance state of components is not considered, so it is considered that the classic component The four-state model is no longer in line with the actual situation of component state transitions.
参考文献:references:
[1]Endrenyi J.Three State Models in Power System Reliability Evaluation.IEEE Trans.on PAS,1971,90:1909-1916.[1] Endrenyi J. Three State Models in Power System Reliability Evaluation. IEEE Trans. on PAS, 1971, 90: 1909-1916.
[2]Ringlee RJ,Goode SD.On procedures for reliability evaluation of transmission systems.IEEETrans.on Power Apparatus Syst.1970,80(4):527-536.[2] Ringlee RJ, Goode SD. On procedures for reliability evaluation of transmission systems. IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus Syst. 1970, 80(4): 527-536.
[3]Endrenyi J.Reliability evaluation of transmission systems with switching afterfaults-approximations and a computer program.IEEE Trans.on PAS.,1973,92:1863-1875.[3] Endrenyi J. Reliability evaluation of transmission systems with switching afterfaults-approximations and a computer program. IEEE Trans. on PAS., 1973, 92: 1863-1875.
[4]Sight c.Models and Concepts for power system reliability evaluation includingprotection-system failures.Electric Power and Energy System,1981.[4]Sight c. Models and Concepts for power system reliability evaluation including protection-system failures. Electric Power and Energy System, 1981.
[5]Allan RN,Ochoa JR.Modelling and assessment of station originated outage for compositesystem reliability evaluation.IEEE Trans.on PAS,1988,3(1):158-165.[5] Allan RN, Ochoa JR. Modeling and assessment of station originated outage for compositesystem reliability evaluation. IEEE Trans. on PAS, 1988, 3(1): 158-165.
[6]Billiton R,Lian G.Station reliability evaluation using a Monte-Carlo approach.IEEE Trans.onPower Delivery,1993,8(3):1239-1245.[6] Billiton R, Lian G. Station reliability evaluation using a Monte-Carlo approach. IEEE Trans. on Power Delivery, 1993, 8(3): 1239-1245.
[7]Billinton R,Chen H,Zhou J Q.Generalized n+2 state system markov model forstation-oriented reliability evaluation.IEEE Transactions on Power System,1997,12(4):1511-1517.[7] Billinton R, Chen H, Zhou J Q. Generalized n+2 state system markov model forstation-oriented reliability evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Power System, 1997, 12(4): 1511-1517.
[8]鲁宗相,郭永基.水电站电气主接线可靠性评估.电力系统自动化,2001,25(18):16-19[8] Lu Zongxiang, Guo Yongji. Reliability Assessment of Electrical Main Wiring of Hydropower Station. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2001, 25(18): 16-19
[9]郭永基.电力系统可靠性分析.清华大学出版社.[9] Guo Yongji. Power System Reliability Analysis. Tsinghua University Press.
[10]陈少华,马碧燕,雷宇,桂存兵.综合定量计算继电保护系统的可靠性.电力系统自动化,2007,31(15):111-115[10] Chen Shaohua, Ma Biyan, Lei Yu, Gui Cunbing. Comprehensive Quantitative Calculation of Reliability of Relay Protection System. Electric Power System Automation, 2007, 31(15): 111-115
[11]MUSA JD.The measurement and management of software reliability.Proceeding of theIEEE,1980,68(9):1131-1143[11] MUSA JD. The measurement and management of software reliability. Proceeding of the IEEE, 1980, 68(9): 1131-1143
[12]胡晓,黄晓明.±800kV特高压换流站可靠性评估.四川电力技术,2007,30(3):1-5[12] Hu Xiao, Huang Xiaoming. Reliability Evaluation of ±800kV UHV Converter Station. Sichuan Electric Power Technology, 2007, 30(3): 1-5
[13]宿志一,范建斌.葛洲坝和南桥换流站一次设备运行情况和健康水平评估.电力设备,2003,4(3):1-9[13] Su Zhiyi, Fan Jianbin. Evaluation of primary equipment operation and health level of Gezhouba and Nanqiao converter stations. Electric Equipment, 2003, 4(3): 1-9
[14]任震,武娟,陈丽芳.高压直流输电可靠性评估得等效模型[J].电力系统自动化,1999,23(9):38-42[14] Ren Zhen, Wu Juan, Chen Lifang. Equivalent Model for Reliability Assessment of HVDC Transmission [J]. Electric Power System Automation, 1999, 23(9): 38-42
[15]马为民,李亚男,周静.特高压直流输电系统可靠性和可用率指标研究.电力设备,2007,8(3):85-88[15] Ma Weimin, Li Yanan, Zhou Jing. Research on Reliability and Availability Index of UHVDC Transmission System. Electric Power Equipment, 2007, 8(3): 85-88
[16]王遂,任震,蒋金良.混合法在高压直流输电系统可靠性评估中得应用.电网技术,2007,31(12):42-46[16] Wang Sui, Ren Zhen, Jiang Jinliang. Application of Hybrid Method in Reliability Assessment of HVDC Transmission System. Power Grid Technology, 2007, 31(12): 42-46
[17]周念成,谢开贵,周家启,赵渊,刘洋.基于最短路得复杂配电网可靠性评估分块算法.电力系统自动化,2005,29(22):39-44[17] Zhou Niancheng, Xie Kaigui, Zhou Jiaqi, Zhao Yuan, Liu Yang. Block Algorithm for Reliability Evaluation of Complex Distribution Network Based on Shortest Path. Automation of Power Systems, 2005, 29(22): 39-44
[18]张鹏,王守相.配电系统可靠性评估的改进区间方法.电力系统自动化,2003,27(17):50-55[18] Zhang Peng, Wang Shouxiang. Improved Interval Method for Distribution System Reliability Assessment. Electric Power System Automation, 2003, 27(17): 50-55
发明内容Contents of the invention
本发明的目的是提出一种±800kV换流站主接线可靠性评估方法,该项方法提出了元件的改进四状态模型并应用于±800kV换流站主接线可靠性评估。由于±800kV换流站的重要性及可靠性要求都非常高,因此在评估主接线可靠性过程中加入了继保和二次设备的可靠性模型,目的是能更详细和精确地反应换流站的可靠性。本方法利用元件的合并分区将原本比较复杂的±800kV换流站主接线进行简化,并应用改进的元件四状态模型于简化后的各分区。该模型重新定义元件的异常状态和检修状态,将元件的状态检修状态与计划检修状态合并归入元件的检修状态,并确定各状态之间的转换关系以及参数的求取。提出利用元件的合并分区方法简化主接线,形成一个简单的有向网络,并将改进的元件四状态模型应用于分区可靠性参数的确定。借用矩阵乘法简化最小路矩阵搜索的方法对有向网络进行最小路搜索,利用解析法枚举有向网络的各种故障状态,并计算出该网络的可靠性数据。The purpose of the present invention is to propose a method for evaluating the reliability of the main wiring of a ±800kV converter station. The method proposes an improved four-state model of components and applies it to the reliability evaluation of the main wiring of a ±800kV converter station. Due to the high importance and reliability requirements of the ±800kV converter station, reliability models of relay protection and secondary equipment are included in the process of evaluating the reliability of the main wiring, in order to reflect the converter in more detail and accurately station reliability. This method simplifies the originally complex main wiring of ±800kV converter station by merging and subdividing components, and applies the improved four-state model of components to the simplified subregions. The model redefines the abnormal state and maintenance state of the component, combines the component's condition-based maintenance state and planned maintenance state into the component's maintenance state, and determines the conversion relationship between each state and the calculation of parameters. The method of merging and partitioning components is proposed to simplify the main wiring to form a simple directed network, and the improved four-state model of components is applied to the determination of partition reliability parameters. Borrowing the method of matrix multiplication to simplify the minimum path matrix search for the directed network, using the analytical method to enumerate various fault states of the directed network, and calculate the reliability data of the network.
本发明的具体步骤如下:Concrete steps of the present invention are as follows:
(1)建立改进元件四状态模型。重新定义设备的异常状态,检修状态和故障状态,及其相关关系,并建立了转换关系,在经典元件四状态模型基础上,增加元件异常状态A。如图1所示。(1) Establish the four-state model of the improved component. Redefine the abnormal state, maintenance state and fault state of the equipment, and their correlations, and establish the conversion relationship. On the basis of the classic four-state model of components, add the component abnormal state A. As shown in Figure 1.
元件异常状态(A):元件某些功能出现故障或者元件出现故障征兆时该元件所处的状态;Component abnormal state (A): the state of the component when some functions of the component fail or the component has a symptom of failure;
元件检修状态(M):为元件处于检修的状态,包含计划检修状态与状态检修状态;Component maintenance status (M): the component is in the maintenance status, including the planned maintenance status and status maintenance status;
元件故障状态(R):当元件无法保证其应有的主功能时所处的状态,对于断路器等开关设备,其误动和拒动归纳入元件的故障状态。Component fault state (R): The state that the component is in when it cannot guarantee its proper main function. For switchgear such as circuit breakers, its malfunction and refusal to operate are included in the fault state of the component.
(2)在主接线可靠性评估中增加了继保及二次设备的可靠性模型,以使换流站主接线可靠性更接近真实水平。(2) The reliability model of relay protection and secondary equipment is added in the reliability evaluation of the main wiring to make the reliability of the main wiring of the converter station closer to the real level.
(3)元件合并分区。对主接线四状态模型进行分区,主元件与其附属元件合并形成分区,相邻串、并联主元件如果合并不影响接线方式则可以合并为一个分区,如果合并后影响接线方式,则单独作为分区,如图4及图5。(3) Component merge partition. Partition the main wiring four-state model. The main component and its subsidiary components are merged to form a partition. If the combination of adjacent series and parallel main components does not affect the wiring method, they can be merged into one partition. If the combination affects the wiring method, they can be used as a separate partition. As shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5.
(4)分区可靠性参数的确定。由于各分区皆由元件构成,则将改进元件四状态模型用于各分区可靠性参数的确定。为将改进的元件四状态模型更好的应用于各分区,定义各分区的状态:分区的异常状态(A)、分区的检修状态(M)、分区的故障状态(R)。各分区状态之间的转换参考图1的元件四状态模型。将改进的元件四状态模型应用于各分区以求得各分区的可靠性参数。(4) Determination of partition reliability parameters. Since each partition is composed of components, the improved four-state model of components is used to determine the reliability parameters of each partition. In order to better apply the improved four-state model of components to each partition, the state of each partition is defined: the abnormal state of the partition (A), the maintenance state of the partition (M), and the fault state of the partition (R). The transition between states of each partition refers to the element four-state model in FIG. 1 . The improved four-state model of components is applied to each partition to obtain the reliability parameters of each partition.
(5)利用最小路搜索法对分区形成的网络进行搜索。(5) Use the minimum path search method to search the network formed by partitions.
附图说明:Description of drawings:
图1是改进的元件四状态模型。Figure 1 is an improved four-state model of the element.
其中:N为元件正常状态;A为元件异常状态;R为元件故障状态;M为元件检修状态;λA为元件从正常状态变为异常状态的概率;λM为设备的检修率,λ‘M为元件从异常状态转为检修状态的状态检修率,‘’λM为元件的计划检修率;λR为元件故障率;λ’A为元件从异常状态变为故障状态的概率;μR为元件修复率;μM为元件修复率。Among them: N is the normal state of the component; A is the abnormal state of the component; R is the fault state of the component; M is the maintenance state of the component; λ Ais the probability of the component changing from a normal state to an abnormal state;M is the condition-based maintenance rate of components changing from abnormal state to maintenance state, ''λM is the planned maintenance rate of components; λR is the failure rate of components; λ'A is the probability of components changing from abnormal state to fault state; μR is the component repair rate; μM is the component repair rate.
图2是现有设备状态曲线。Figure 2 is the state curve of the existing equipment.
图3是某个换流站的主接线图。Figure 3 is the main wiring diagram of a certain converter station.
图4是图3中一个单极合并分区的主接线图。Fig. 4 is a main wiring diagram of a single-pole merged partition in Fig. 3 .
图5是主接线分区简化图。Figure 5 is a simplified diagram of the main wiring partition.
其中:zone11至zone43为各分区代号Among them: zone11 to zone43 are the code names of each zone
图6是依据本发明提出的可靠性指标的计算流程方框图。Fig. 6 is a block diagram of the calculation flow of the reliability index proposed according to the present invention.
具体实施方式Detailed ways
下面结合实施例及其附图详细说明。The following describes in detail in conjunction with the embodiments and accompanying drawings.
(1)建立改进元件四状态模型(1) Establish a four-state model for improved components
状态检修中,当某一设备是按照状态检修方式进行检修时,设备的状态是状态检修方式的依据。如图2,在设备状态检修方式中,设备故障征兆点从A点开始,当设备的状态出现异常即检测到故障征兆B点出现时,工作人员会在此故障征兆点B到故障发生时刻D这段时间内密切监测设备状态,当设备状态到达状态阀值点C时将会有两种处理方式:1、对设备进行停运检修;2、直到设备状态降低到状态点D时进行维修或更换。通过这两个方式我们可以看出,当为方式1时该设备从异常状态转为强迫停运状态,当为方式2时该设备从异常状态转为故障状态。In condition-based maintenance, when a certain equipment is overhauled according to the condition-based maintenance method, the state of the equipment is the basis of the condition-based maintenance method. As shown in Figure 2, in the equipment condition-based maintenance mode, the equipment failure symptom point starts from point A. When the equipment status is abnormal, that is, when the fault symptom point B is detected, the staff will go from this fault symptom point B to the fault occurrence time D During this period of time, the equipment status is closely monitored. When the equipment status reaches the status threshold point C, there will be two processing methods: 1. Shut down the equipment for maintenance; 2. Perform maintenance or replace. Through these two methods, we can see that when the mode 1 is used, the equipment changes from the abnormal state to the forced outage state, and when the mode 2 is used, the equipment changes from the abnormal state to the failure state.
在经典元件四状态模型里面,只对设备的强迫停运方式以及计划检修方式进行了定义,没有考虑设备的状态检修方式。根据图2设备状态曲线以及上一段对状态检修过程的分析,本发明认为设备的状态检修也应该纳入元件四状态模型之中。本发明重新定义设备的异常状态,检修状态和故障状态,及其相关关系,并建立改进元件四状态模型如图1。In the classical component four-state model, only the forced outage mode and the planned maintenance mode of the equipment are defined, and the condition-based maintenance mode of the equipment is not considered. According to the equipment state curve in Figure 2 and the analysis of the condition-based maintenance process in the previous paragraph, the present invention considers that the condition-based maintenance of equipment should also be included in the four-state model of components. The present invention redefines the abnormal state, maintenance state and fault state of the equipment, and their correlations, and establishes a four-state model for improved components as shown in Figure 1.
根据改进元件四状态模型,元件从正常状态N出发对应检修状态M和异常状态A,元件的异常状态A转换为故障状态R和检修状态M,即表明:元件从正常运行开始,可能会因为计划检修进入检修状态,也可能因为小的毛病或者异常进入元件的异常状态,而元件处于异常状态后,可能因为及早发现其异常情况,所以对元件进行状态检修,也可能因为没有及早发现其情况或者故意等到其故障后再修理,而使元件进入故障状态。元件由故障状态到正常状态是指设备的故障后修复过程。According to the improved element four-state model, starting from the normal state N, the element corresponds to the maintenance state M and the abnormal state A, and the abnormal state A of the element is transformed into the fault state R and the maintenance state M, which means that: the element starts from normal operation, and may be due to the planned When the overhaul enters the overhaul state, it may also enter the abnormal state of the component due to a small fault or abnormality. After the component is in an abnormal state, it may be because of early detection of the abnormal situation, so the condition maintenance of the component may be carried out, or it may be because the condition was not detected early or Deliberately waiting until it fails before repairing it, causing the component to go into a failed state. The component from the fault state to the normal state refers to the repair process of the equipment after the fault.
通过对比改进的元件四状态模型与经典元件四状态模型可知,改进元件四状态模型更能清晰表现元件状态之间的转换,且M状态与R状态的记录提取更简便。因为M状态即为元件处于检修状态的纪录,R状态即为元件处于故障状态的纪录。所需要增加的是元件A状态的纪录,而由于本发明的改进四状态模型是建立在设备的状态监测技术基础上的,元件异常状态A的纪录也容易取得。By comparing the improved component four-state model with the classic component four-state model, it can be seen that the improved component four-state model can more clearly represent the transition between component states, and the record extraction of M state and R state is easier. Because the M state is the record that the component is in the maintenance state, and the R state is the record that the component is in the fault state. What needs to be added is the record of the state of the component A, and since the improved four-state model of the present invention is based on the state monitoring technology of the equipment, the record of the abnormal state A of the component is also easy to obtain.
(2)在主接线可靠性评估中增加了二次及继保可靠性模型。继电保护的可靠性涉及软件和硬件两个部分。硬件可靠性为:(2) In the main wiring reliability evaluation, the secondary and relay reliability models are added. The reliability of relay protection involves two parts, software and hardware. The hardware reliability is:
λ=γQ(C1γTγV+C2γE)γL(1)λ=γQ (C1 γT γV +C2 γE )γL (1)
λH=λT+λJ(3)λH =λT +λJ (3)
式中:γQ为器件质量因数;C1为电路复杂因数;γT为温度加速因数;γV为电压应力因数C2为封装复杂因数;γE为应用环境因数;γL为为器件成熟因数;N为模块M中元器件的总个数。λH为硬件故障率;λT为通讯模块故障率;λJ为继电保护模块故障率。In the formula: γQ is the device quality factor; C1 is the circuit complexity factor; γT is the temperature acceleration factor; γV is the voltagestress factor C2 is the package complexity factor; γE is the application environment factor; Factor; N is the total number of components in module M. λH is the hardware failure rate; λT is the communication module failure rate; λJ is the relay protection module failure rate.
软件可靠性模型采用John Musa模型[11]来处理,该模型的软件失效率为:The software reliability model is handled by the John Musa model[11] , and the software failure rate of this model is:
式中:τ为累积执行时间,即程序从开始运行到本次评估可靠性所经历的时间;τ’为程序运行时间,即从本次评估开始,程序可无故障运行的时间;λ0为初始故障率,与最初的无故障时间T0及软件的缺陷总数M0有关。In the formula: τ is the cumulative execution time, that is, the time from the start of the program to the evaluation of reliability; τ' is the running time of the program, that is, the time for the program to run without failure from the beginning of this evaluation;λ0 is The initial failure rate is related to the initial failure-free time T0 and the total number of software defects M0 .
继电保护可靠性由软件可靠性和硬件可靠性两部分组成,且两者也具有串连事件的特征,则继电保护可靠性如下式:The reliability of relay protection consists of two parts: software reliability and hardware reliability, and both of them also have the characteristics of series events, so the reliability of relay protection is as follows:
λJB=λS+λH(5)λJB =λS +λH (5)
式中:λJB为继电保护故障率;λS为软件故障率;λH为硬件故障率。Where: λJB is the failure rate of relay protection; λS is the software failure rate; λH is the hardware failure rate.
(3)元件合并分区。以某个±800kV换流站主接线为例,如图3。由于换流站内元件数量众多,为方便主接线可靠性评估,利用元件合并分区的方法对主接线进行分区。基本原则为:主元件与其附属元件合并形成分区,相邻串、并联主元件如果合并不影响接线方式则可以合并为一个分区,如果合并后影响接线方式,则单独作为分区。根据以上原则,该±800kV换流站主接线可以形成以下分区:(3) Component merge partition. Take the main wiring of a ±800kV converter station as an example, as shown in Figure 3. Due to the large number of components in the converter station, in order to facilitate the reliability evaluation of the main wiring, the method of merging and partitioning the components is used to partition the main wiring. The basic principle is: the main component and its subsidiary components are combined to form a partition. If the combination of adjacent series and parallel main components does not affect the wiring method, they can be merged into one partition. If the combination affects the wiring method, they can be used as a separate partition. According to the above principles, the main wiring of the ±800kV converter station can form the following partitions:
a.换流站内交流断路器、换流变压器及其继电保护装置形成一个分区。a. The AC circuit breaker, converter transformer and its relay protection device in the converter station form a partition.
b.换流阀与其所属避雷器作为一个分区。b. The converter valve and its lightning arrester are regarded as a partition.
c.平波电抗器与滤波器作为一个分区。c. Smoothing reactor and filter as a partition.
d.直流侧断路器形成一个分区。d. DC side circuit breakers form a partition.
则主接线极1-1组简化如图4,图中虚线框表示所分分区。Then the main terminal pole 1-1 group is simplified as shown in Figure 4, and the dotted line box in the figure indicates the partition.
由以上分区方法可知,换流站整体简化如图5所示,其中zone11~zone43为分区命名。From the above zoning method, it can be known that the overall simplification of the converter station is shown in Figure 5, where zone11~zone43 are the names of the zones.
(4)应用改进元件四状态模型求取各分区可靠性参数。(4) Apply the improved component four-state model to obtain the reliability parameters of each partition.
为将改进的元件四状态模型更好的应用于各分区,定义:In order to better apply the improved element four-state model to each partition, define:
分区的异常状态(A):主元件处于异常状态或主元件正常运行的情况下,其监测设备故障时该分区所处的状态。Abnormal state of the partition (A): When the main element is in an abnormal state or the main element is operating normally, the state of the partition when the monitoring equipment fails.
这样定义是因为如果主元件的保护、监测设备故障时,虽对主接线连通性无影响,但导致隐形故障或多重故障的可能性将会增大,此时对于换流站的安全性和可靠性都将有较大影响,则此时该元件处于异常状态。例如,假设换流阀正常工作,而其换流阀避雷器故障,无法起到涌流保护作用,且避雷器监测设备也失效或运行人员没注意其故障信号时,在雷击事件中,换流阀故障的可能性将大大增加,但是整个换流站仍然能继续运行,则称此时换流阀处于异常状态。This definition is because if the protection and monitoring equipment of the main components fail, although the connectivity of the main wiring will not be affected, the possibility of invisible faults or multiple faults will increase, which is very important for the safety and reliability of the converter station. will have a greater impact on the performance, then the component is in an abnormal state at this time. For example, assuming that the converter valve works normally, but the arrester of the converter valve is faulty, which cannot protect the inrush current, and the monitoring equipment of the arrester also fails or the operator does not pay attention to the fault signal, in the event of a lightning strike, the fault of the converter valve The possibility will be greatly increased, but the entire converter station can still continue to operate, it is said that the converter valve is in an abnormal state at this time.
分区的检修状态(M):分区内不管是附属元件还是主要元件,只要处于计划检修状态或状态检修状态中的任何一种,则称为检修状态。The maintenance state of the partition (M): Whether it is an auxiliary component or a main component in the partition, as long as it is in any one of the planned maintenance state or the state maintenance state, it is called the maintenance state.
分区的故障状态(R):分区内主元件故障时或者其保护设备故障时该分区所处的状态。如,变压器故障或者当变压器正常运行,但是保护设备拒动或误动时,可认为该分区为故障状态。Fault state of the partition (R): The state of the partition when the main component in the partition fails or its protection equipment fails. For example, when the transformer fails or when the transformer operates normally, but the protective equipment refuses to operate or malfunctions, the partition can be considered as a fault state.
各分区状态之间的转换参考图1。将改进的元件四状态模型应用于各分区以求得各分区的可靠性参数。对于断路器-换流变压器形成的分区,其故障率参数如下式:Refer to Figure 1 for the transition between partition states. The improved four-state model of components is applied to each partition to obtain the reliability parameters of each partition. For the partition formed by circuit breaker-converter transformer, the failure rate parameter is as follows:
由于各个分区都是由元件组合而且,可见元件的状态对应着各分区状态,将元件四状态模型应用于各分区,以取得分区可靠性参数,对于断路器-换流变压器形成的分区,其故障率参数如下式:Since each partition is composed of components and it can be seen that the state of the component corresponds to the state of each partition, the four-state model of the component is applied to each partition to obtain the reliability parameters of the partition. For the partition formed by the circuit breaker-converter transformer, its failure The rate parameter is as follows:
λR=λR(d-b)+λ(JB)λR = λR (db) + λ(JB)
λA=λA(d-b)+λxλA = λA(db) + λx
λ′M=λxλ′M = λx
λ′A=λJBλ′A =λJB
其中:λR为分区故障率,λA为分区异常概率,λ’M为分区状态检修概率,λ’A为分区状态检修概率,μM为分区检修修复率,μR为分区故障修复率;λR(d-b)为断路器和变压器故障率之和;λA(d-b)为断路器和变压器异常状态率之和,λd-M为断路器检修率,λb-M为变压器检修率,λd-R为断路器故障率,λb-R为变压器故障率,μd-M为断路器检修修复率,μb-M为变压器检修修复率,μd-R为断路器故障修复率,μb-R为变压器故障修复率;Among them: λR is the partition failure rate, λA is the abnormal probability of the partition, λ'M is the partition state maintenance probability, λ'A is the partition state maintenance probability, μM is the partition repair repair rate, and μR is the partition fault repair rate; λR(db) is the sum of failure rate of circuit breaker and transformer; λA(db) is the sum of abnormal state rate of circuit breaker and transformer, λdM is maintenance rate of circuit breaker, λbM is maintenance rate of transformer, λdR is open circuit λbR is the failure rate of the transformer, μdM is the maintenance and repair rate of the circuit breaker, μbM is the maintenance and repair rate of the transformer, μdR is the failure recovery rate of the circuit breaker, and μbR is the failure recovery rate of the transformer;
对于换流阀、避雷器形成的分区,其故障率参数如下式:For the partition formed by the converter valve and the arrester, the failure rate parameter is as follows:
λR=λh-R+λblλR = λhR + λbl
λA=λbl=λ′AλA =λbl =λ′A
λ′M=0(7)λ′M = 0(7)
其中:λh-R为换流器故障率,λh-A为换流器异常率,λh-M为换流器检修率,λbl为避雷器故障率,μh-M为换流器检修修复率,μh-R为换流器故障修复率;Among them: λhR is the failure rate of the converter, λhA is the abnormal rate of the converter, λhM is the repair rate of the converter, λbl is the failure rate of the arrester, μhM is the repair rate of the converter, and μhR is the converter repair rate. Flow device failure repair rate;
对于平波电抗器、滤波器形成的分区,其故障率参数如下式:For the partitions formed by smoothing reactors and filters, the failure rate parameters are as follows:
λR=λc-R+λk-RλR = λc R + λk R
λA=0=λ′M=λ′AλA = 0 = λ'M = λ'A
其中:λc-R为滤波器故障率,λc-M为滤波器检修修复率,λk-R为平波电抗器故障率,λk-M为平波电抗器检修修复率,μc-M为滤波器检修修复率,μc-R为滤波器故障修复率;μk-M为平波电抗器检修修复率,μk-R为平波电抗器故障修复率;Among them: λcR is the failure rate of the filter, λcM is the maintenance and repair rate of the filter, λkR is the failure rate of the smoothing reactor, λkM is the maintenance and repair rate of the smoothing reactor, μcM is the maintenance and repair rate of the filter, μcR is the fault repair rate of the filter; μkM is the maintenance repair rate of the smoothing reactor, and μkR is the fault repair rate of the smoothing reactor;
对于直流侧断路器形成的分区,其故障率参数如下式:For the partition formed by the DC side circuit breaker, the failure rate parameter is as follows:
λR=λp-R+λJBλR = λpR + λJB
λA=λx=λ′MλA = λx = λ′M
λ′A=λJB (9)λ′A =λJB (9)
其中:λp-R为直流侧断路器故障率,λp-M为直流侧断路器检修率,μp-R为直流侧断路器故障修复率,μp-M为直流侧断路器检修修复率,μx为断路器通讯模块检修修复率,μJB为断路器继保模块修复率,Among them: λpR is the failure rate of the DC side circuit breaker, λpM is the maintenance rate of the DC side circuit breaker, μpR is the failure recovery rate of the DC side circuit breaker, μpM is the maintenance and repair rate of the DC side circuit breaker, and μx is the communication of the circuit breaker Module maintenance and repair rate, μJB is the repair rate of circuit breaker relay protection module,
(5)对分区所形成网络的最小路搜索(5) Minimum path search for the network formed by the partition
根据图5可知,各分区形成一个有向网络。利用矩阵乘法对最小路进行搜索,方法如下:It can be known from Figure 5 that each partition forms a directed network. Use matrix multiplication to search for the minimum path, as follows:
a.定义各分区为一个节点,建立网络的邻接矩阵A1=[a1ij]。a. Define each partition as a node, and establish the adjacency matrix A1 =[a1ij ] of the network.
其中:当节点vi和vj之间有连接时,a1ij=1或a1ij=-1;当vj和vj之间无连接或j=i时,a1ij=a1ji=0。Where: when there is a connection between nodes vi and vj , a1ij =1 or a1ij =-1; when there is no connection between vj and vj or j=i, a1ij =a1ji =0.
b.建立网络的邻接终点矩阵R=[rjk]。b. Establish the adjacency terminal matrix R=[rjk ] of the network.
其中:当节点vj和终点vk之间有连接时,r1jk=1;当vj和vk之间无连接或j=k时,r1jk=0;Where: when there is a connection between node vj and terminal vk , r1jk =1; when there is no connection between vj and vk or j=k, r1jk =0;
c.将矩阵A1与邻接终点矩阵R相乘,得到新矩阵A2=[a2ik]。c. Multiply the matrix A1 with the matrix R of the adjacent destination to obtain a new matrix A2 =[a2ik ].
其中:当i,j,k三个节点各不相同时,a2ik=a1ijrjk;当a1ij=0或rjk=0或vk至少与vi和vj中的一个相同时,a2ik=0。Where: when the three nodes i, j, and k are different, a2ik = a1ij rjk ; when a1ij = 0 or rjk = 0 or vk is at least one of vi and vj At the same time, a2ik =0.
d.改变终点vk,重复以上步骤,得到矩阵A3,A4,...An-1,d. Change the end point vk and repeat the above steps to obtain the matrix A3 , A4 ,...An-1 ,
e.将A1,A2,...An-1中对应位置(i,j)的非零元素组合起来,就得到从节点i到节点j之间的所有最小路。e. Combining the non-zero elements corresponding to positions (i, j) in A1 , A2 , . . . An-1 , all the minimum paths from node i to node j are obtained.
f.由于本申请所选择的节点已经包含了主接线内所有需要评估的元件,没有单节点元件被遗漏,则该最小路集矩阵即为最终的路集矩阵。利用路集矩阵可以对任意的节点进行割集分析。f. Since the nodes selected in this application already contain all the elements that need to be evaluated in the main wiring, and no single node element is omitted, the minimum road set matrix is the final road set matrix. The road set matrix can be used to perform cut set analysis on any node.
可靠性指标统计流程如图6所示。具体流程如下:读入网络拓朴、形成网络信息矩阵、形成最小路集矩阵、枚举网络状态、计算最小割集、统计各状态下网络可靠性指标。The reliability index statistical process is shown in Figure 6. The specific process is as follows: read in the network topology, form the network information matrix, form the minimum road set matrix, enumerate the network status, calculate the minimum cut set, and count the network reliability indicators in each state.
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNA2008100582539ACN101251835A (en) | 2008-04-07 | 2008-04-07 | A Reliability Evaluation Method for Main Wiring of ±800kV Converter Station |
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNA2008100582539ACN101251835A (en) | 2008-04-07 | 2008-04-07 | A Reliability Evaluation Method for Main Wiring of ±800kV Converter Station |
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN101251835Atrue CN101251835A (en) | 2008-08-27 |
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNA2008100582539APendingCN101251835A (en) | 2008-04-07 | 2008-04-07 | A Reliability Evaluation Method for Main Wiring of ±800kV Converter Station |
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN101251835A (en) |
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101557106B (en)* | 2009-01-15 | 2011-01-19 | 南方电网技术研究中心 | Reliability Calculation Method for UHVDC Transmission System |
| CN102157929A (en)* | 2011-04-13 | 2011-08-17 | 国网电力科学研究院 | Main wiring method of multi-terminal ultra high voltage direct current transmission system |
| CN102222170A (en)* | 2011-06-21 | 2011-10-19 | 重庆大学 | Markov state space diagram method for evaluating reliability of converter transformer system |
| CN102496910A (en)* | 2011-12-02 | 2012-06-13 | 广州捷能电力科技有限公司 | Fault analyzing method of multi-device internet |
| CN102663565A (en)* | 2012-04-24 | 2012-09-12 | 辽宁省电力有限公司抚顺供电公司 | Secondary device status maintenance and evaluation system |
| CN102684176A (en)* | 2012-05-11 | 2012-09-19 | 许继集团有限公司 | Networking differential protection method for power distribution network based on maintenance of terminal equipment |
| CN103178512A (en)* | 2013-01-29 | 2013-06-26 | 中国南方电网有限责任公司超高压输电公司广州局 | Reliability Assessment Method for HVDC Transmission System |
| CN103217624A (en)* | 2013-03-18 | 2013-07-24 | 国家电网公司 | Power distribution network reliability assessment state labeling method based on segments |
| CN103633647A (en)* | 2013-12-05 | 2014-03-12 | 国家电网公司 | Power grid topology based power system reliability calculation method |
| CN103886517A (en)* | 2014-03-18 | 2014-06-25 | 国家电网公司 | Risk assessment method for important user of 10kV power distribution network |
| CN104063757A (en)* | 2014-06-12 | 2014-09-24 | 国家电网公司 | Transformer substation main electrical connection assessment method suitable for different development stages of power grids |
| CN104217120A (en)* | 2014-09-15 | 2014-12-17 | 国家电网公司 | Method for evaluating reliability of digital transformer substation relay protection system |
| CN104933252A (en)* | 2015-06-23 | 2015-09-23 | 浙江工业大学 | Reliability evaluation method for multi-abstraction-level circuit |
| CN105243281A (en)* | 2015-10-30 | 2016-01-13 | 西安交通大学 | Thyristor converter valve reliability evaluation method of considering operating state |
| CN105913336A (en)* | 2016-04-15 | 2016-08-31 | 华北电力大学 | Uncertain-random-system-based main wiring reliability analysis method of intelligent substation |
| CN107194594A (en)* | 2017-05-26 | 2017-09-22 | 中国南方电网有限责任公司超高压输电公司天生桥局 | A Reliability Evaluation Method for Physical Information System of Back-to-Back Converter Station Based on IEC61850 |
| CN107229595A (en)* | 2017-05-10 | 2017-10-03 | 广西大学 | A kind of real-time robust condition estimating system of the power network of SOA framework and method |
| CN107292532A (en)* | 2017-07-12 | 2017-10-24 | 广东工业大学 | The one of a kind of five state space is for one for distribution network reliability appraisal procedure |
| CN107292533A (en)* | 2017-07-12 | 2017-10-24 | 广东工业大学 | The one of a kind of four state space is for one for distribution network reliability appraisal procedure |
| CN115455695A (en)* | 2022-09-14 | 2022-12-09 | 国网内蒙古东部电力有限公司电力科学研究院 | Reliability assessment method and system for main wiring of UHV DC system converter station |
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101557106B (en)* | 2009-01-15 | 2011-01-19 | 南方电网技术研究中心 | Reliability Calculation Method for UHVDC Transmission System |
| CN102157929A (en)* | 2011-04-13 | 2011-08-17 | 国网电力科学研究院 | Main wiring method of multi-terminal ultra high voltage direct current transmission system |
| CN102157929B (en)* | 2011-04-13 | 2013-04-10 | 国网电力科学研究院 | Main wiring method of multi-terminal ultra high voltage direct current transmission system |
| CN102222170B (en)* | 2011-06-21 | 2013-07-31 | 重庆大学 | Markov state space diagram method for evaluating reliability of converter transformer system |
| CN102222170A (en)* | 2011-06-21 | 2011-10-19 | 重庆大学 | Markov state space diagram method for evaluating reliability of converter transformer system |
| CN102496910A (en)* | 2011-12-02 | 2012-06-13 | 广州捷能电力科技有限公司 | Fault analyzing method of multi-device internet |
| CN102496910B (en)* | 2011-12-02 | 2014-04-23 | 广州捷能电力科技有限公司 | Fault analyzing method of multi-device internet |
| CN102663565A (en)* | 2012-04-24 | 2012-09-12 | 辽宁省电力有限公司抚顺供电公司 | Secondary device status maintenance and evaluation system |
| CN102684176B (en)* | 2012-05-11 | 2015-01-14 | 许继电气股份有限公司 | Networking differential protection method for power distribution network based on maintenance of terminal equipment |
| CN102684176A (en)* | 2012-05-11 | 2012-09-19 | 许继集团有限公司 | Networking differential protection method for power distribution network based on maintenance of terminal equipment |
| CN103178512A (en)* | 2013-01-29 | 2013-06-26 | 中国南方电网有限责任公司超高压输电公司广州局 | Reliability Assessment Method for HVDC Transmission System |
| CN103217624A (en)* | 2013-03-18 | 2013-07-24 | 国家电网公司 | Power distribution network reliability assessment state labeling method based on segments |
| CN103217624B (en)* | 2013-03-18 | 2016-04-20 | 国家电网公司 | A kind of evaluating reliability of distribution network status indication method based on section |
| CN103633647A (en)* | 2013-12-05 | 2014-03-12 | 国家电网公司 | Power grid topology based power system reliability calculation method |
| CN103633647B (en)* | 2013-12-05 | 2016-03-02 | 国家电网公司 | A kind of electric power system reliability degree calculation method based on power network topology |
| CN103886517A (en)* | 2014-03-18 | 2014-06-25 | 国家电网公司 | Risk assessment method for important user of 10kV power distribution network |
| CN103886517B (en)* | 2014-03-18 | 2017-06-06 | 国家电网公司 | A kind of methods of risk assessment of 10kV power distribution networks responsible consumer |
| CN104063757A (en)* | 2014-06-12 | 2014-09-24 | 国家电网公司 | Transformer substation main electrical connection assessment method suitable for different development stages of power grids |
| CN104063757B (en)* | 2014-06-12 | 2017-02-01 | 国家电网公司 | Transformer substation main electrical connection assessment method suitable for different development stages of power grids |
| CN104217120A (en)* | 2014-09-15 | 2014-12-17 | 国家电网公司 | Method for evaluating reliability of digital transformer substation relay protection system |
| CN104933252A (en)* | 2015-06-23 | 2015-09-23 | 浙江工业大学 | Reliability evaluation method for multi-abstraction-level circuit |
| CN104933252B (en)* | 2015-06-23 | 2017-12-29 | 浙江工业大学 | A kind of reliability estimation method towards more abstraction hierarchy circuits |
| CN105243281A (en)* | 2015-10-30 | 2016-01-13 | 西安交通大学 | Thyristor converter valve reliability evaluation method of considering operating state |
| CN105243281B (en)* | 2015-10-30 | 2018-04-17 | 西安交通大学 | A kind of thyristor valves reliability estimation method of meter and operating status |
| CN105913336A (en)* | 2016-04-15 | 2016-08-31 | 华北电力大学 | Uncertain-random-system-based main wiring reliability analysis method of intelligent substation |
| CN107229595A (en)* | 2017-05-10 | 2017-10-03 | 广西大学 | A kind of real-time robust condition estimating system of the power network of SOA framework and method |
| CN107229595B (en)* | 2017-05-10 | 2020-11-03 | 广西大学 | Power grid real-time robust state estimation method based on SOA (service oriented architecture) |
| CN107194594A (en)* | 2017-05-26 | 2017-09-22 | 中国南方电网有限责任公司超高压输电公司天生桥局 | A Reliability Evaluation Method for Physical Information System of Back-to-Back Converter Station Based on IEC61850 |
| CN107292532A (en)* | 2017-07-12 | 2017-10-24 | 广东工业大学 | The one of a kind of five state space is for one for distribution network reliability appraisal procedure |
| CN107292533A (en)* | 2017-07-12 | 2017-10-24 | 广东工业大学 | The one of a kind of four state space is for one for distribution network reliability appraisal procedure |
| CN107292533B (en)* | 2017-07-12 | 2020-10-23 | 广东工业大学 | A four-state space power supply reliability evaluation method for one supply and one standby distribution network |
| CN115455695A (en)* | 2022-09-14 | 2022-12-09 | 国网内蒙古东部电力有限公司电力科学研究院 | Reliability assessment method and system for main wiring of UHV DC system converter station |
| CN115455695B (en)* | 2022-09-14 | 2025-09-19 | 国网内蒙古东部电力有限公司电力科学研究院 | Method and system for evaluating reliability of main wiring of extra-high voltage direct current system converter station |
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN101251835A (en) | A Reliability Evaluation Method for Main Wiring of ±800kV Converter Station | |
| CN112072647B (en) | CPS safety assessment method and device for distribution network considering the impact of communication faults | |
| CN105391064B (en) | Transmission system cascading failure methods of risk assessment based on accurate hidden failure model | |
| CN107609725A (en) | A kind of power transmission network methods of risk assessment for considering transformer station and influenceing | |
| CN103001328A (en) | A Fault Diagnosis and Evaluation Method for Smart Substation | |
| CN110380514B (en) | Intelligent substation relay protection secondary circuit fault diagnosis method | |
| CN103605787B (en) | Method and system for evaluating and analyzing relay protection | |
| CN104901306B (en) | Power grid operation safety margin calculating method taking cascading faults into consideration | |
| CN103308824A (en) | Power system fault diagnostic method based on probability Petri net | |
| CN103986238B (en) | Intelligent substation fault diagnosis method based on probability weighting bipartite graph method | |
| Duan et al. | Reliability evaluation in substations considering operating conditions and failure modes | |
| CN104750878A (en) | Mixed searching strategy-based topology fault diagnosis method | |
| Ni et al. | Reliability assessment of cyber physical power system considering communication failure in monitoring function | |
| CN104766246A (en) | Power system fault diagnosis method based on timing order fuzzy Petri net | |
| CN106130781A (en) | Transformer fault accumulative effect appraisal procedure based on power distribution network topological model | |
| Hajian-Hoseinabadi | Availability comparison of various power substation automation architectures | |
| Balachandran et al. | Component-level reliability evaluation model for cyber power devices | |
| CN111695231B (en) | Practical reliability analysis method for complex power distribution network information physical system | |
| CN108509751A (en) | A kind of power information physical coupling system dynamic modelling method considering delay matrix | |
| CN110336280B (en) | Power system cascading failure analysis method based on dictionary set acceleration | |
| Edwards et al. | Flexible model-based alarm processing for protection performance assessment and incident identification | |
| CN105046011A (en) | Rapid analysis method used for state of electric device and based on topological computation of distributed power grid | |
| CN117934210B (en) | A distribution network system resilience assessment method based on constructing multiple evaluation indicators | |
| CN102611085B (en) | Intertripping simulation analysis method | |
| CN110021933A (en) | Consider the power information system control function reliability estimation method of component faults |
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| C02 | Deemed withdrawal of patent application after publication (patent law 2001) | ||
| WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication | Open date:20080827 |