2~ 7~
CONVERSION INCREASE OF V~CUUM RESIDUUMS
(D#79,023 ~F~
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a process for the con-version of vacuum residua in a hydrocracking operation.
More particularly, it relates to the treatment of uncon-verted vacuum residua to remove the most undesired asphal-tenic materials therefrom in order to increase the conver-sion of the vacuum residue vir~in feed.
In converting heavy vacuum residua, e.g., in a hydrocracking operation, a problem with obtaining a good or better conversion is the amount of asphaltenes or asphalte-nic materials which ar~ deficient in hydrogen and have a high trace metals content. In selectively removing a major portion of the more hydrogen deficient asphaltenes from the unconverted 1000F plus material, the effective conYersion of the remaining 1000F material, as well as the original vacuum residum chargestock, may be significantly enhanced.
Thus, it is àn ob~ect~of the present invention to provide a means of treating the unconverted vacuum bottoms to obtain the optimum conversion of virgin vacuum residuum.
:~
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
U.S. Patent Rs. 32,265 discloses a hydrogenation process using at least one fluidized catalytic stage and a recycle material o~ heavy~hydrogenated effluent. The heavy effluent materlal is cooled to a temperature within 7~4 350-600F to separate toluene and heptane insoluble coke precursors prior to recycle. This separation may be en-hanced by the use of centrifugation, filtration or a bed of particulate matarial, e.y., calcined coke.
U.S. Patent 4,411,7~8 discloses a higher conver-sion in a process for upgrading high boiling hydrocarbon materials to valuable lower boiling hydrocarbon materials in an ebullated catalytic bed wherein rscycle is recovered from the upgraded product and at least 25 percent by volume of the recycle is comprised of the 950~F plus components of the product. The liquid recycle is cooled to a temperature of 350F to 700F to separate coke precursors from the liquid recycle on a bed of particulate solids prior to recycling it back to the hydrogenation zone.
U.S. Patent 4,305,~14 discloses discloses an energy efficient process for separating a hydrocarbonaceous material into various fractions employing solvents at ele-vated temperatures and pressures. The solvent compositioncomprises at least one member sslected from the group of paraffinic hydrocarbons containing from 3 through 9 carbon atoms, mono-olfin hydrocarbons containing from 4 through 8 carbon atoms, aromatic hydrocarbons having a normal boiling point temperature below about 350F and alcohols containing from 3 through 9 carbon atoms. The particular amount of asphaltenes or sediment that should be removed to obtain a deasphalted oil that has excellent recycle properties is not disclosed.
U.S. Patent 4,502,944 discloses a method oE sepa-rating a process material comprising oils, resins and as-phaltenes into at least three fractions. Method employs light organic solvents (paraffinic hydrocarbons preferably having between 3 and 8 carbon atoms in a solvent/process PR\VAM121 - 2 -2~
material ratio of at least about 3:1) under elevated temper-ature and pressure conditions. As in U.S. Patent 4,305,814, the particular amount of asphaltenes or sediment that should be removed to obtain a d0asphalted oil that has excellent recycle properties is not disclosed.
U.~. Patent 3,412,010 discloses that the conv~r-sion of a vacuum residuum in a hydrocracker is improved by recycling the 680-975F cut and the 975 plus residue back to the reactor. No mention of removing coke precursors or asphaltenes in the recycle streams is provided.
U.S. Patent 3,905,892 discloses a process for hydrocrackiny vacuum residuum wherein the g75F plus product may be recycled after removing the asphaltenes. The latter is partially oxidized to yield hydrogen for providing make-up hydrogen for the hydrocracking reactor. Tha effect of deasphalting conditions on product yields when the deasphal-ted oil is recycled is not disclosed.
U.S. Patent 4,457,830 discloses the use of inor-ganic acids for precipitating and decomposing preasphaltenes and coprecipitating solids. The effect of deasphalting conditions on product yields when the deasphalted oil is recycled is not disclosed.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides an improvement in a method for conversion of a vacuum residuum feed ir. a hydro-cracking operation which comp~ises upgrading the vacuum residuum feed, recovering and separating distillates from the remaining vacuum residuum feed and recycling unconverted vacuum residuum bottoms to the upgrading zone. The improve-ment comprises deasphalting the unconverted asphaltene-PR\VAM121 - 3 -2~ 7'~
containing unconverted vacuum residuum bottoms in the re-cycle stream by treating said unconverted vacuum residuum bottoms in an extraction zone with a cosolvent under ambient conditions to a related temperature (and sufficient pressure wherein the recycle stream and cosolvent are maintained in a liquid state), whereby the most undesirable hydrogen defici-ent asphaltenes are selectively removed from the unconverted vacuum residuum bottoms to increase the overall conversion of the vacuum residuum feed.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION
The present invention for improving the conversion of a virgin vacuum residuum into a useful product suggests the treatment of the unconverted vacuum bottoms after separating it from the cracked reaction distillate product in the reactor affluent. Then the treated vacuum bottoms, less the most undesirable hydrogen deficient asphaltenes and a majority of the trace metals, is recycled back to the reaction æone to be converted to additional quantities of the desired distillate products, i.e. naphtha, diesel fuel and vacuum gas oil. The lattar stream is used to make addi-tional naphtha and diesel fuel by using it as a charge stock component for a fluidized catalytic cracking unit.
In khe overall process of converting a vacuum residuum feed into the desired distillates, the improvement provided by the present invention i5 the treatment o~ the unconverted vacuum bottoms with a cosolvent to selectively remove most of the undesirable hydrogen deficient asphal-tenes from the vacuum bottoms prior to their being recycled to the reactor, i.e., reaction zone, for further hydro-cracking.
PR\VAM121 - 4 -7~
As a result of the cosolvent treatment, the amount of the most undesirable hydrogen deficient asphal~enes to be selectively removed ranges ~rom about 10 percent to about 20 percent.
In treating the unconverted vacuum bottoms with a cosolvent, the amount of cosolvent used is defined as the volume ratio of cosolvent to unconverted vacuum bottoms and ranges from about 1:1 to about 40:1.
The cosolvents that may be used according to the present invention include individual solvents such as n-pentane or n-heptane or (C5-C7) paraffines or a mixture of (C5-C6) naphthenes and (C~-C7) aromatics. The aromatics being benzene and toluene.
To illustrate the advantage o~ deasphalting with n-heptane, a sample of the untreated unconverted vacuum bottoms and various deasphalted oils from the same unconverted vacuum bottoms sample were processed in a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) at a catalyst space velocity of 0.13 bbl/lb/day at successive temperatures of 795, 805 and 815F over an Mo/A1203 catalyst that mimics the steady-state activity of a commercial NiMo/A1203. The CSTR
25 pressure was held at 2,250 psig with hydrogen and an H2 treatment rate o~ 7,000 SCF/bbl. Processing the untreated and unconverted vacuum bottoms and samples o~ the same unconverted vacuum bottoms individually deasphalted with toluene, cyclohexane and n-heptane gave the following results:
PR\VAM121 - 5 -~OlO~
;t M O -I o t~l~
¦ rl ~D ~
I a) R-- O
¦ ~: ~ o\~ ' ' ~H r~
I ~ I ~ 1 11) Ct\ I~O O O S~ O ~) 1~0~) ... ... ....
3 O ~ 1 0 0 0 00 0 0 ~ ~ U
H ~
~rl O
rl I ~1 ~ U
:Z O
~n I ~ ~ ~ O ~
I U ~:: M ~n ~ m M U~ s:: O X
I 1: 0 O a) ~ ~ a) oo o o o o o o o o ~ a I ~ ~3 E~ 0 ~5 O
I ~ ~1) Ul ,r 1 I O U~,C
U S~l O
,e h O
a~
~0 ~ ~ H (~
E~ O ~ o\' ~ ~ ~
~o . 0~ ~a O ~1 ~) ~ ~1 rl ~
~: ~ ~ 1 ,q ~ liZ; H `~
H S~3 0 ~ ~ ~ 1` ~ t~ O ~1 Cl) a~
E~ H H 1-1~1 ~ U~ O l¢ ~ ~ a ~; m H
l¢ ~ K
E' ,~!;pEl ~3 U
¢ O ~1 1¢ ~ :~
t~ P
~ R
,1~ ~
~ I
M
D ~rl~rl :~
o ~ ~ o ~1 ~ o ~ o ~ ~ a) t) ~ _ U M ~I
E~ ~ O
~
~ X ,~
_I ~ rl U U ,Q O ,~ U
O ~ ~C O O
o ~ o ~ s 1 ~ 0 a) ~ ~ .) a) r~
~ a) M M O a) U~
Iq ~ rl ~~ ~3 rl ~ ~a~ 0~ 0~O~O ~ 0 a)~O
U ~) U ~ r-l U ~ U ~\ , ;~ ~ ~ o ~ o o ~ o a) ~~ ù Q) ~
tq P ~ Q ~ R ~ P .Q h-rl P ~ rl Z~)77~
The above results show that the n-heptane deasphalted vacuum bottoms sample provides a much improved recycle stream for a residuum hydrocracking process designed to upgrade 1000F
and above boiling point components. Not only is the allow-able conversion increased at a given temperature but, essen-tially, no sediment is foxmed. The latter is very important for reducing catalyst poisoning and minimizing plugging problems on account of sediment formation and deposition in flow control valves, heat exchangers and separation vessels lQ downstream from the reaction zone. In addition, deasphalting the vacuum bottoms recycle stream with n-hep-tane versus the other solvents allows the reactor tempera-ture to be increased by at least 10F to further improve hydrocracking conversion without causing additional sediment.
Deasphalting vacuum bottoms with toluene shows a negligible improvement in the overall conversion of the 1000F plus boiling point components compared with the untreated vacuum bottoms and essentially no improvement in reducing sediment formation as measured by Soxhlet extractions with toluene.
The cyclohexane deasphalted vacuum bottoms, on the other hand, provides an intermediate valued recycle stream in that the conversion is significantly improved over the untreated or toluene deasphalted vacuum bottoms but sediment begins to form in the reactor effluent as the reactor temperature is raised to provide a better overall conversion of the compo-nents boiling above 1000F.
It is of interest to note the relative amounts of sediment removed from the particular vacuum bottoms sample (VB) with solvents selected from each of the three basic hydrocarbon types at solvent/VB dosages of 20/1 at ambient conditions:
PR\VAM121 - 7 -2~077a~
Sediment, wt.%
Toluene < 0.5 Cyclohexane6 - 7 n-Heptane 15 - 16 It is well known in the art that the lighter the n-para~fin used for deasphalting the more sediment (comprising asphal-tenes, other carbonaceous material and trace metals) will be removed from vacuum or atmospheric residuum. For instance, deasphalting the same vacuum bottoms sample with n-pentane removed 20-22 wt.~ sediment. The object is to remove as little sediment as possible and still improve the overall conversion of lOOo~F plus material while producing no more sediment.
Certainly if the n~heptane deasphalted vacuum bottoms improves conversion without causing any additional sediment, the n-pentane deasphalted vacuum bottoms would do as well but there would be the additional amount of asphaltenes to be disposed of. Consequently, it is proposed that deasphal-ting with n-heptane provides a standard for determining how much of the asphaltene phase should be removed for a given vacuum bottoms stream i~ a mixed solvent comprising paraf-fins and naphthen2s with some aromatics is being used.
Another reason for not removing more of the sediment than necessary is to avoid removing the lighter asphaltenes containing a higher proportion of hydrogen and less carbon since the number of condensed aromatics is less. The light-er asphaltenes crack more easily and thereby help to improvethe overall conversion of the lOoo F plus boiling point components. Some of the key analytical indicators for the deasphalted vacuum bottom (VB) samples are summarized in Table II:
PR\VAM121 - 8 -,:
07~
TABLE II
Micro Carbon Hydrogen/Carbon Trace Metal Test, wt.% Weiqht Ratio Anal~ses. ~m Nickel Vanadium Untreated VB 22.5 0.1140 28 38 Toluene DAVB 22.3 0.1156 29 28 Cyclohexane DAvs 18.1 0.1211 13 14 n-Heptane DAVB 12.3 0.1341 < 5 2.4 n-Pentane DAVB 10.4 - < 5 2 In Table III below, samples of untreated and n-heptane deasphalt-ed vacuum bottoms were blended with virgin vacuum residue and processed in a CSTR, as described in ~he first illustration, to better stimulate a commercial application. The blends were made up of one part untreated VB (or n-hep~ane DAV~3 and two parts by weight of virgin vacuum residue. The results show that as the hydrocracking reactor severity was increased by raising the temperature to 815F ~he n-heptane DAVB allowed the conversion of 1000F plus material to be increased without producing any additional sediment. Moréover, by deasphalting the same vacuum bottoms sample with n-heptane the reactor temperature could be raised at least another 10F to obtain additional conversion without producing any additional sediment formation.
TABLE III
Calculated Overall Conversion of 1000F
Plus Boiling Point Presence Sample TemPerature F Material (wt.%) of Sediment Untreated 795 52 none VB with 805 55 yes Virgin VR 815 65 yes n-Heptane Deasph. 795 51 none VB recycle 805 55 none with Virgin VR 815 66 none 825 70 none PR\VAM121 - 9 -