[Translation from French] WO 00/18592 PCT/FR98/02084 NONPNEUMATIC DEFORMABLE WHEEL The present invention concerns nonpneumatic wheels, notably, those capable of being used in substitution for tires on vehicles. It has been tried for a long time to design such non-pneumatic wheels, that is, operating without compressed air, in order to overcome every problem raised by flats or reduction of inflation pressure of tires. Among very numerous proposals, the one described in U.S. Patent 3,324,988 can be cited. Said patent describes a non-pneumatic deformable wheel containing a disk, an internal element fastened to the disk, an annular external element intended to come in contact with the road, flexible and appreciably inextensible, and a plurality of spokes arranged between the internal and external elements. The external element has a length such that it stresses said spokes under radial com-pression. In other words, they are prestressed (that is, preloaded). Beyond a certain stress threshold, since the spokes are stressed on end, the radially oriented reaction force that each of those spokes can develop remains constant. The wheel also contains means of stabilization of the relative positions of the external and internal elements. The spokes bend in a meridian plane and the means of stabilization limit the relative axial displacements of the internal and external elements. CONFIRMATION COPY This deformable wheel uses as connection between the internal and external elements spokes prestressed beyond their buckling load. Thus, in case of increase of the load supported by the wheel, that increase is compensated only by an increase in number of spokes actually supporting the load. This results in an increase of length of the contact between the wheel and the road. Such behavior is very close to that of a tire. This wheel presents, however, one major disadvantage. The different spokes buckle in their meridian planes, but have practically no possibility of circumferential deformation, for their section presents great inertia in the circumferential direction. Now, on rolling, considerable longitudinal forces are undergone by the external element in contact with the road, notably, in the area of contact, which leads to rapid deterior ation of the previous nonpneumatic wheel. The object of the invention is a deformable structure designed to constitute, with a disk, for example, a nonpneumatic wheel presenting the same advantages of comfort and performance, while solving the preceding problem. The deformable structure for a vehicle, according to the invention, designed to roll on an axis of rotation, comprises an annular internal element centered on the axis, an annular external element forming a tread, flexible and appreciably in-extensible, radially arranged externally relative to the internal element, a plurality of spokes arranged between the internal and external elements, each spoke being capable of opposing to a radial compressive stress, beyond a given threshold, an appreciably constant force, the annular external element having a length such that the spokes are 2 prestressed in radial com-pression, as well as means of stabilization of the relative positions of the internal and external elements. This rolling structure is characterized in that the spokes are formed and arranged between the internal element and external element, in such a way that their flexibility in a meridian plane is well below their flexibility in a circumferential plane, and in that the means of stabilization limit the amplitude of a circum-ferential relative rotation between the internal and external elements. The wheel obtained from the deformable structure according to the invention presents the following advantage: each spoke can be deformed in a circumferential direction, in particular during rolling, when it is in the zone of contact between the external element and the road. The spokes are preferably prestressed beyond their buckling load. The means of stabilization can also include elastic con-nections nonradially joining the internal and external elements, such as cables or slender beams. The means of stabilization are prestressed in extension in state of rest in order to exert a return force immediately upon a relative rotation displacement between the internal and external elements. The ends of the spokes can be fastened by embedding or by joints in the internal element and/or external element. The means of stabilization can also be a thin shell prestressed in radial extension. The deformable structure according to the invention can also constitute a safety insert designed to be mounted in an assembly consisting of a tire and a rim. 3 Several embodiments of the invention are now described by means of the following figures: - Figure 1 is an axial view of a wheel consisting of a deformable structure according to the invention fastened to a disk; - Figure 2 is a meridian section of the wheel of Figure 1; - Figure 3 presents a partial axial view of a wheel similar to that of Figures 1 and 2, equipped with stabilization means; - Figure 4 presents jointed double spokes in state of rest 4a and in deformed state 4b; and - Figure 5 presents another embodiment of the spokes, double and embedded, in state of rest 5a and in deformed state 5b; - Figure 6 presents spokes of the wheel of Figure 1 under load, outside area of contact 6a and in area of contact 6b; - Figure 7 presents means of stabilization of the wheel of Figure 6 under load, outside area of contact 7a and in area of contact 7b. Figures 1 and 2 present, in axial view and in meridian section respectively, a nonpneumatic wheel consisting of a deformable structure 1 according to the invention, attached to a disk 2. The deformable structure 1 includes an internal element 3 connected to the disk 2, an annular external element 4 and spokes 5 joining the internal element 3 and the external element 4. The spokes 5 are distributed in two sets of 60 elements arranged axially side by side (Figure 2). The spokes 5 have a parallelepipedal shape with a small thickness relative to their length and width. 4 This shape makes it possible to bend them easily in the direction of their thickness. The spokes 5 have their two longitudinal ends fastened respectively to the internal element 3 and to the external element 4 by joints 51. Said spokes are so arranged between the internal element 3 and external element 4 that their length is in a radial direction, their width is in an axial direction, and their thickness is in a circumferential direction. Consequently, the spokes 5 can bend under a radial compression of their longitudinal ends. Said bending is circumferential. The flexibility of the spokes 5 in a meridian plane is therefore much less than their flexibility in a circumferential plane. In the embodiment of Figures 1, 2 and 4, the joints 51 consist of two parts 511 and 512 (see Fig. 4), fastened to each other by a pin 513. That method of fastening makes possible a free rotation between both parts 511 and 512 of the joints 51. The pins 513 are arranged in the axial direction of the wheel. Said method of connection allows a rotation of the spokes 5 relative to the internal and external elements in the plane of the wheel. The spokes 5 are, for example, made of a fiberglass-reinforced polymer material. The annular external element 4 comprises a thin metal hoop (in the order of 0.1 to 1 mm thick) covered with an elastomer layer designed to come in contact with the road (said elastomer layer is not shown in Figure 2). The external element thus has a low flexural 'strength and is appreciably inextensible. The circumferential length of said external element 4 is such that the spokes 5 are all pre-stressed in axial compression beyond their buckling load. All such spokes 5 are therefore in postbuckling state. Consequently, the reaction force they oppose to the internal element 3 and external element 4 is appreciably constant and independent of their radial compression. 5 The wheel, as presented in Figures 1 and 2, is in unstable state of equilibrium, and the energy stored in the spokes 5 tends to be released by a rotation displacement of the external element 4 relative to the internal element 3. In order to limit the relative rotation between the internal element 3 and the external element 4, the deformable structure 1 is provided with means of stabilization presented in Figure 3. Said means of stabilization consist, for example, of cables 6 joining the internal element 3 and the annular external element 4. In Figure 3, the cable 61 is shown fastened at A to the internal element 3 and fastened at B to the external element 4. 0 being on the axis of rotation of the wheel, the angle AOB = a is, in the example represented and at rest, equal to 30 degrees. Said angle AOB can vary from 1 to 45 degrees and preferably between 25 and 35 degrees. The cables 6 are formed and arranged to be taut at rest. Said cables 6 are thus going to contain the rotation displacement of the annular external element 4 relative to the internal element 3. Punctual relative displacements in the area of contact remain possible, however. The stiffness, arrangement, extension prestressing and number of those cables influence the propensity to maintain, on the whole, the position of equilibrium shown in Figure 1. On the other hand, said cables make it possible to adjust the circumferential stiffness of the wheel according to their particular stiffness in extension, as well as depending on their inclination relative to the circumferential direction. The cables can also be of several different thicknesses on both sides of their anchoring point in the internal element and external element, which entails a variation of response of the wheel to a torque applied circumferentially. The angles of inclination can also be 6 changed on both sides of their anchoring points in order to obtain such asymmetry of mechanical response. The cables can also be substituted by more monolithic elements or any equivalent means of stabilization. Figures 4 and 5 present other methods of arrangement and connection of the spokes to the internal element 3 and external element 4. Figure 4 shows two spokes 52 and 53 with their joints 51. As previously, the joints 51 contain two parts, the first 511, where a longitudinal end of the spoke 52, 53 is embedded, and the second 512, rigidly fastened to the internal element or external element. Those two parts are joined by a pin 513, placed, wheel mounted, in the axial direction of the deformable structure 1. In the embodiment of Figure 4, the spokes are arranged between the internal and external elements circum-ferentially in pairs with, as before, their bending plane oriented circumferentially. The longitudinal ends of the spokes 52 and 53 are embedded in supports 511, so that the distance D separating the two spokes is greater than the distance d separating the two pins 513. Consequently, on an axial com pression, the torque is applied on the spokes and imparts a circumferential bending of the two spokes in two opposite directions, so that their center parts diverge (Figure 4b). This set-up has the advantage of facilitating buckling of the spokes always in the same direction. Figure 5 presents a double spoke 56 embedded in a support 57. In contrast to the preceding embodiments, this support 57 comprises only one part rigidly connected to the internal or external elements. Spoke 56 consists of two parallelepipedal half spokes 561 and 562 arranged circumferentially side by side and embedded in supports 7 57. Supports 57 are fastened to the internal and external elements. Said half-spokes are separated circumferentially by a plate 563. Said plate orients, as previously, the circumferential bending of the two half-spokes in two opposite directions, so that their center parts diverge (Figure 5b). Figures 6 and 7 illustrate schematically the behavior of a wheel containing a deformable structure 1 upon being crushed on a flat road. Said wheel contains two sets of spokes 5 similar to those of Figures 1, 2 and .3 and stabilization means 7 consisting of two sets of polyurethane square-section beams. The two sets of beams 7 have a nonradial inclination and are arranged symmetrically on both sides of the radial direction, as illustrated in Figure 3. The modulus of extension of said beams is in the order of 20 MPa. The orientation of the beams 7 is similar to that of the cables 6 presented in Figure 3. In Figures 6b and 7b only, the external element 4 has been represented with a layer of elastomer material assuring contact with the road 8. Said layer has a thickness of approximately 10 mm. For the sake of clarity of presentation, the course of behavior of only one of the two sets of spokes 5 outside the area of contact (6a) and in the area of contact (6b) is represented in Figures 6a and 6b, and the course of just one of the two sets of beams in (7b) and outside the area of contact (7a) is represented in Figures 7a and 7b. Upon crushing of the wheel I on a road 8, one finds that the spokes 5 all remain in postbuckling state, but with marked variations of radial compression. Three cases arise: outside the areas of contact (6a) -- spokes R1 -- the spokes show a slight radial compression; in the area of contact, between points E and F, the spokes R2 show a 8 markedly greater radial compression; in proximity to entry and exit from the area of contract, the spokes R3 show an intermediate radial compression. The radial compression of the spokes 5 directly depends on the radial distance between the internal element and external element and, therefore, on the deflection of the wheel upon being crushed on the road. As each spoke is in a postbuckling state, it exerts an appreciably constant reaction force on the external element 4. In the zone of contact between the ground and the wheel, the area of contact, the external element or tread therefore exerts an appreciably constant mean pressure on the ground. Said force is practically unaltered by the amplitude of the radial compression supported by the spoke 5, and the pressure exerted by the annular external element in the corresponding zone is thus appreciably independent of the amplitude of the deflection assumed by the crushed wheel. This behavior is thus very close to that of a tire. It makes it possible to absorb the uneven nesses of the road without entailing harsh reactions transmitted to the wheel disk, or generating significant variations of the surface of contact between wheel and road. This behavior is very close to that of a tire. Figure 7 illustrates the course of just one of the two sets of beams in (7b) and outside the area of contact (7a). Three cases arise: the beams whose points of anchoring to the internal and external elements are outside the area of contact (7a) -- beams H1 -- are in a slightly taut state; the beams -- beams H2 -- whose points of anchoring to the external element are in the area of contact, between points E and F, are in a state of buckling; the beams arranged on entry and exit from the area of 9 contact - beams H3 -- are in an intermediate state. One thus finds that the beams, one anchoring point of which is in the area of contact, have their tension relaxed by the radial compression of the external element which brings the anchoring points of the beams together between the internal element and the external element. Consequently, said beams, whose section is small, buckle and only weakly oppose that radial compression of the external element in the area of contact or on running over an obstacle. The wheel presented also has the advantage of excellent homogeneity of contact pressures between the annular external element and a flat road in the axial direction, owing to the symmetry of construction of the spokes appearing in Figure 2. An external element 4 can easily be made by vulcanizing a thickness of rubber on a belt. Said belt can be a flat steel sheet of width L and 0.1 mm thick. The deformable structure according to the invention can also be provided with means to limit radial compression of the spokes, such as stops. For example, it is possible to provide between the two axially juxtaposed set of spokes of Figures 1 to 3 an annular stop fastened to the internal element, of such outer diameter that it limits the maximum axial compression of those spokes to approximately 50%. In the examples presented in Figures 1 to 3, two sets of axially juxtaposed spokes have been arranged, but it is entirely possible to increase that number of axially juxtaposed sets appreciably, in order to improve the behavior of the wheel or insert formed on an uneven road. The external element can likewise be formed by one or more axially juxtaposed elements. 10