Record
Are populists friends or foes of constitutionalism?
- Abstract:
In this policy brief, Cas Mudde of the University of Georgia sets out a definition for populism and argues that, contrary to claims by the Tea Party and other populist movements around the world, populism is in fact theoretically opposed to constitutionalism. He reasons that, while populism is essentially democratic, by adopting a form of extreme majoritarianism, it is contrary to the limits placed on both popular sovereignty and majority rule that are integral to constitutional principles.
Mudde describes populists as taking an opportunistic approach toward constitutions, clinging to the constitutional protection of their minority rights, while rejecting those of other minorities on the basis of the democratic argument of majority rule.
The brief identifies flaws in the often vague and moralizing liberal attacks on populist movements, and instead makes recommendations that liberal democrats should emphasize the illiberal aspects of populism, while emphasizing the importance of liberal aspects of the political culture and system.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Email
Email this record
Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.Cite
Cite this record
APA Style
Mudde, C. (2013). Are populists friends or foes of constitutionalism? (Publisher's version). Foundation for Law, Justice and Society.MLA Style
Mudde, C. Are Populists Friends or Foes of Constitutionalism? Publisher's version, Foundation for Law, Justice and Society, 2013.Chicago Style
Mudde, C. 2013. “Are Populists Friends or Foes of Constitutionalism?” The Social and Political Foundations of Constitutions. Foundation for Law, Justice and Society.Print
Access Document
- Files:
- (Preview, Version of record, pdf, 481.2KB,Terms of use)
Why is the content I wish to access not available via ORA?
Content may be unavailable for the following four reasons
- Version unsuitable
- We have not obtained a suitable full-text for a given research output. See theversions advice for more information.
- Recently completed
- Sometimes content is held in ORA but is unavailable for a fixed period of time to comply with the policies and wishes of rights holders.
- Permissions
- All content made available in ORA should comply with relevant rights, such as copyright. See thecopyright guide for more information.
- Clearance
- Some thesis volumes scanned as part of the digitisation scheme funded by Dr Leonard Polonsky are currently unavailable due to sensitive material or uncleared third-party copyright content. We are attempting to contact authors whose theses are affected.
Alternative access to the full-text
- Publisher:
- Foundation for Law, Justice and Society
- Series:
- The social and political foundations of constitutions
- Place of publication:
- http://www.fljs.org/content/social-and-political-foundations-constitutions-publications
- Publication date:
- 2013-01-01
- Edition:
- Publisher's version
- Language:
- English
- Keywords:
- Subjects:
- UUID:
- uuid:fc657de0-ab0c-4911-8d2b-646101599b65
- Local pid:
- ora:8118
- Deposit date:
- 2014-02-27
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- The Foundation for Law, Justice and Society
- Copyright date:
- 2013
- Notes:
- Policy brief. © The Foundation for Law, Justice and Society 2013.
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here:Report update to this record