Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


We would love to hear from you!
Journal article icon

Journal article

A meta-analysis on the use of gabapentinoids for the treatment of acute post-operative pain following total knee arthroplasty

Abstract:

Background:

Total knee arthroplasty is a painful procedure, with approximately half of patients reporting severe pain during the early postoperative period. Gabapentinoids are used as an adjunct for the management of acute pain in approximately half of enhanced recovery programs. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness and safety of gabapentinoids for the treatment of acute postoperative pain following total knee arthroplasty.

Methods:

Randomized controlled trials of patients undergoing elective primary total knee arthroplasty that compared the use of the gabapentinoid class of drugs (gabapentin [Neurontin; Pfizer]) or pregabalin [Lyrica; Pfizer]) with that of placebo were retrieved, with 12 studies meeting inclusion criteria. The primary outcome was pain intensity with activity at 48 hours following the surgical procedure. The secondary outcomes included pain intensity at other time points, opioid consumption, knee function, incidence of chronic pain, and adverse events.

Results:

No difference in pain score at 12, 24, 48, or 72 hours following the surgical procedure was seen between gabapentin and placebo. Although pregabalin was associated with reduced pain scores at 24 and 48 hours, this corresponded to a reduction of 0.5 point (95% confidence interval, 0 to 1.0 point) at 24 hours and 0.3 point (95% confidence interval, 0 to 0.6 point) at 48 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale, which was assessed as not clinically important. Overall, no clinically relevant reduction in pain scores was associated with the use of gabapentinoids. Likewise, gabapentinoids were associated with a small, but not clinically important, reduction in cumulative opioid consumption at 48 hours (mean difference, −23.2 mg [95% confidence interval, −40.9 to −5.4 mg]). There was no difference in knee flexion at 48 hours (p = 0.63) or in the incidence of chronic pain at 3 months (p = 0.31) or 6 months (p = 0.54) associated with the use of gabapentinoids. Although gabapentinoids were associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of nausea (risk ratio, 0.7 [95% confidence interval, 0.6 to 0.9]; p < 0.001), pregabalin was also associated with a significant, clinically relevant increase in the risk of sedation (risk ratio, 1.4 [95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 1.9]; p = 0.02).

Conclusions:

On the basis of this meta-analysis, we found no evidence to support the routine use of gabapentinoids in the management of acute pain following total knee arthroplasty.

Level of Evidence:

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


  • Email

    Email this record

    Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

    Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

    Please add any additional information to be included within the email.

  • Cite

    Cite this record

    APA Style

    Hamilton, T., Strickland, L., & Pandit, H. (2016). A meta-analysis on the use of gabapentinoids for the treatment of acute post-operative pain following total knee arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 98(16), 1340–1350.

    MLA Style

    Hamilton, T., et al. “A Meta-Analysis on the Use of Gabapentinoids for the Treatment of Acute Post-Operative Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 98, no. 16, Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2016, pp. 1340–50.

    Chicago Style

    Hamilton, T, L Strickland, and H Pandit. 2016. “A Meta-Analysis on the Use of Gabapentinoids for the Treatment of Acute Post-Operative Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 98 (16): 1340–50.
  • Print

Access Document


Files:
Generating preview...
Publisher copy:
10.2106/JBJS.15.01202

Why is the content I wish to access not available via ORA?

Bibliographic data (the information relating to research outputs) and full-text items (e.g. articles, theses, reports, etc.) arrive in ORA from several different sources. Unfortunately we are not able to make available the full-text for every research output.
Pleasecontact the ORA team if you have queries regarding unavailable content OR if you are aware of a full-text copy we can make available.

Content may be unavailable for the following four reasons

  • Version unsuitable
      We have not obtained a suitable full-text for a given research output. See theversions advice for more information.
  • Recently completed
      Sometimes content is held in ORA but is unavailable for a fixed period of time to comply with the policies and wishes of rights holders.
  • Permissions
      All content made available in ORA should comply with relevant rights, such as copyright. See thecopyright guide for more information.
  • Clearance
      Some thesis volumes scanned as part of the digitisation scheme funded by Dr Leonard Polonsky are currently unavailable due to sensitive material or uncleared third-party copyright content. We are attempting to contact authors whose theses are affected.

Alternative access to the full-text

You may be able to access the full-text directly from the publisher's website using the 'Publisher Copy' link in the 'Links & Downloads' box from a research output's ORA record page. This method may require an institutional or individual subscription to the journal/resource.

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
NDORMS
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
NDORMS
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
NDORMS
Role:
Author


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/0187kwz08
Funding agency for:
Hamilton, T


Publisher:
Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
Journal:
Journal of Bone and Joint SurgeryMore from this journal
Volume:
98
Issue:
16
Pages:
1340-1350
Publication date:
2016-08-17
Acceptance date:
2016-04-27
DOI:
EISSN:
1535-1386
ISSN:
0021-9355


Language:
English
Pubs id:
pubs:622866
UUID:
uuid:cbe29197-14a9-47dc-b961-2ad3e24fd1c0
Local pid:
pubs:622866
Source identifiers:
622866
Deposit date:
2016-05-18

Terms of use


Copyright holder:
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
Copyright date:
2016
Rights statement:
Copyright © 2016 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.
Notes:
This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins athttps://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.15.01202
Licence:
Terms and Conditions of Use for Oxford University Research Archive


Views and Downloads

Altmetrics



Dimensions




If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here:Report update to this record

Report an update

We require your email address in order to let you know the outcome of your enquiry.

Reason for update



Please add any additional information to be included within the email.

TO TOP


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp