
As the sprint of the shortest election period allowed under Canadian law nears the finish line, one aspect of the campaign that has stood out is the central role that international law has played in political messaging. The unsubstantiated claim that Israel is committing genocide while fighting against Hamas has surfaced several times.
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
- Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.
- Unlimited online access to National Post.
- National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
- Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
- Support local journalism.
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
- Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.
- Unlimited online access to National Post.
- National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
- Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
- Support local journalism.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
- Access articles from across Canada with one account.
- Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
- Enjoy additional articles per month.
- Get email updates from your favourite authors.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
- Access articles from across Canada with one account
- Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
- Enjoy additional articles per month
- Get email updates from your favourite authors
Sign In or Create an Account
During the French-language leaders debate last week, for example, NDP LeaderJagmeet Singh asked Liberal Leader Mark Carney, “Why don’t you call it what it is? It’s a genocide.” Carney responded that he prefers not to use the word “genocide” in a manner that will “politicize” the situation in Gaza.
The next evening, during the English-language debate,Singh criticized Carney for not acknowledging that “what’s going on in Gaza has now clearly become a genocide.”
The next issue of Platformed will soon be in your inbox.
This time, Carney did not directly address the genocide claim. Instead, hestuck to theLiberal platform of calling for an immediate ceasefire, the release of all hostages, more humanitarian aid for civilians in Gaza and a lasting two-state solution.
Earlier in the month, during a Carney campaign rally, an attendeeshouted, “There’s a genocide happening in Palestine.” Rather than confronting the assertion, Carney responded, “I’m aware, which is why we have an arms embargo.” When asked later by a reporter if he concedes there is a genocide in Gaza,Carney claimed he “didn’t hear that word” during the rally.
While Carney’s assertion seems rather implausible based onvideo of the exchange, his campaigndid not return repeated requests to clarify his position on the “genocide” issue following the rally and aftera video surfaced of Liberal candidate Adam van Koeverden telling a group of constituents that their voices will help “end the genocide in Gaza.”
With the NDP leader stridently insisting Israel is committing genocide and the Liberal leader’s position on the matter unclear, the characterization of Israel’s conflict against Hamas in Gaza has emerged as a central — perhaps even pivotal — issue in the federal election. It is imperative to clarify whether the military campaign against Hamas actually does qualify as one of the worst possible crimes under international law.


In short, no, Israel is not committing genocide. Canada’s political leaders should be clear about this, or they should be held accountable for misleading the electorate.
The crime of genocide is established in theGenocide Convention of 1948 and clarified in theRome Statute of 1998, both of which Canada has adopted. It is committed when prohibited acts are carried out “with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group.”
Israel’s political leaders have repeatedly affirmed that the strategic objectives of the campaign in Gaza are to destroy Hamas’s military and governing capabilities, thereby ending the enduring security threat posed by the terrorist group, and the return of all the hostages.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahureiterated this message earlier this month, and these remain consistent with thegoals announced in October 2023, during the early stages of the ground offensive in Gaza.
Seeking to destroy a transnational terrorist group that promises a repeat of the October 7 massacre is not genocide — it’s war.
A significant number of civilian casualties are, unfortunately, predictable given that Hamas deliberately hides and fights among the civilian population. But harm to civilians that is incidental to attacks in pursuit of the destruction of a terrorist group during armed conflict does not constitute genocide.
To date, Turkey is the only NATO member that hasofficially concluded that Israel is committing genocide. Some activist groups, such asHuman Rights Watch andAmnesty International, have also characterized Israel’s conduct as genocide.
However, these assertions are based almost entirely on comments from various Israeli political leaders that were taken out of context, coupled with observed effects of the conflict that can be consistent with the intent to destroy Hamas rather than the population of Gaza.
When it comes tothe genocide case initiated by South Africa at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), it iscommonly suggested that the court’sprovisional measuresconcluded that Israel’s conduct in Gaza amounts to a “plausible genocide.” However, this is anincorrect interpretation of thepurpose of ICJ provisional measures.
Israel is not committing genocide in Gaza. When Canadians head to the polls, they should consider each party’s record on countering this pernicious disinformation directed against Canada’s closest ally in the Middle East.
National Post
Twitter.com/BrianCox_RLTW
Brian L. Cox is an adjunct professor of law at Cornell Law School, a retired U.S. army judge advocate, a journalism graduate student at Carleton University and a contributor to the Macdonald-Laurier Institute in Ottawa.









