TheWikimedia principles emerged from many debates aboutwiki ideology.Growing Wikimedia was eventually written to summarize some of the principles elaborated as below:

Neutral point of view--draft

Proposed revision of the NPOV policy

NPOV as description not prescription

Systemic Bias of Wikipedia

Natural point of view

NPOV is an ideal

Consensus editing

Meatball Wiki take on NPOV and Wikipedia

South Slavic NPOV page

If NPOV is science, how do I deal with cases where the US 'science' is at odds with at least 80% of the world?

Etiquette

Wikipedia vandalism

Consensus and implications of its definition for all of the core issues

Simple View of Ethics and Morals

Be bold in updating pages

Should talk pages be used for debating?

Should Wikipedia Use Profanity? (Stephen Gilbert and others)

Wikimedia mission statement

Uploads being abused

Standard email texts for asking permission to use texts or images

Stress

Vandalbot

Don't vote on everything

Does locking a page indicate a lack of trust?

Verifiability

Governance

Power structure

Status (the different status existing in thepower structure)

Stewards (see alsosteward policies)

Wikipedia and copyright issues

Wikipedia Designated Agent

Copyright - what isfair use in quotation and what violates laws? whose law applies? what problems are we actually trying to solve here?

Avoid Copyright Paranoia!

Do fair use images violate the GFDL?

Copyright bot

American non-acceptance of the rule of the shorter term

Vocabulary - an educational and an ethical issue

Defining vocabulary - the core glossary, should coordinate with[1]

Use of the present tense, and overuse of the past tense

Wikipedia is not Wiki - a little bit of wiki nomenclature

• Community
• Meta-Wiki organisation
• Wikimedia projects
• Collaboration