ShouldAutoconfirmed users be added to this list?Dbiel07:35, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
en:Wikipedia:User access levels mentions these user groups:
*2 User groups
The template {{user groups}} does not list them all. Besides all these, there is a special user group, not listed in these two: developers.
This should be corrected in the template.Kubura (talk)03:22, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
It should be something like this:
| Local: | blocked user –unregistered user –new user -newly-registered user –registered user –autoconfirmed user (same as autopatrolled/cofirmed user???) –bot –flooder –reviewer –rollbacker –administrator –bureaucrat –file mover -accountcreator –IP block exempt –Importer –transwiki –edit filter manager -abuse filter manager -oversight –checkuser –afttest and afttest-hide |
|---|---|
| Global: | locked account –unified account –bot –rollbacker –abuse filter editor –interface editor –new wiki importers –sysop –researcher –developer –ombudsman –founder –staff –system administrator –steward |
"New" groups are in italics. I've consulted alsoUser groups. See alsoUser permissions API,Manual:User rights.
P.S. Restu20, "You have reason" has confused me for a second (it's OK, I understood, but it sounded somehow strange), but just for a second. And then I looked at your userpage. :) Non c'è problema. Ho capito tutto - hai ragione. :) Tanti auguri,Kubura (talk)03:18, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Another new one istemplate editor. I imagine it should be added here as well. ⇔ChristTrekker📫18:41, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
I have reviewed the Arabic version of the template and found that it is not the same in terms of layout and different items. I tried to see the page template and found that it is not marked for translation. Should it be marked for translation or edited and updated directly using the VisualEditor? --16:03, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
@Camouflaged Mirage and~riley: I'd suggest reverting tothis edit and re-edit anything from there.Minorax (talk)07:51, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
This group is not only in enwiki, the jawiki, kowiki and more have this group. But the link is only linked to enwiki. Should this change to an other way to show this group?--LaMagiaaa (talk)18:21, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
@Pppery: I don't like how some terms are in plural and some in singular, and capitalization is inconsistent too. Any thoughts on that? Regards,Alalch E. (talk)02:05, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the|answered= or|ans= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
Currently, the table overflows to the right when the text appearance is set to "large". This would not be a problem if it was possible to scroll the table horizontally, but unfortunately the current implementation does not allow the user to do so.
In my sandbox page I have made a change that adds the horizontal scroll feature by wrapping the table in a
<div></div>
. This way, the overflowed links can be easily reached by scrolling horizontally.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:NOTAROBOT1101/sandbox/Template:User_groups&diff=prev&oldid=29234133NOTAROBOT1101 (talk)16:08, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
I just removed the 2fa tester group from the template since it got deleted. I saw there is a "Historical group" subsection for the local groups. Is there a pattern how we want to treat historical global groups here? --Zabe (talk)11:15, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
