„A family of sets is pairwise disjoint or mutually disjoint if every two different sets in the family are disjoint.“ – fromWikipedia article "Disjoint sets"
What about the empty family of sets? Is it also pairwise disjoint?
I think, that the empty family of sets is pairwise disjoint, because statements of the form $\forall x \in \emptyset:\ldots$ are always true. Am I right?
2 Answers2
Yes, you are right. It is vacuously true. Here's a more detailed explanation of why:
In math, either a statement is true, or its negation is true (but not both). That means, for example, either the statement (a) $\forall x \in \emptyset$, $x^{2} = 1$ or its negation, (b) $\exists x \in \emptyset$ such that $x^{2} \neq 1$, is true, and the other is false.
It's clear that statement (b) is false since $\exists x \in \emptyset$ is a false statement. So, since statement (b) is false, its negation, statement (a), must be true (it's called vacuously true).
- $\begingroup$"In math, either a statement is true, or its negation is true (but not both)" actually, this is only valid in classical logic, but it really doesn't matter for this question$\endgroup$univalence– univalence2020-04-07 19:19:55 +00:00CommentedApr 7, 2020 at 19:19
If $A$ isnot a family of sets which are pairwise disjoint, then thereexists $A_1,A_2\in A$ such that $A_1\neq A_2$ and $A_1\cap A_2\neq\varnothing$.
So... yes.
You mustlog in to answer this question.
Explore related questions
See similar questions with these tags.
