Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


After Parrot, what next?

Brian QuinlanBrianQ at ActiveState.com
Tue Apr 17 16:12:05 EDT 2001


Mark 'Kamikaze' Hughes wrote:>   Not even remotely.  SAX-like parsers make for really fast> benchmarks,> but they're totally useless for most real-world applications; even> pull-based variants instead of the standard push-based ones> suck.  What> you *NEED* 255 times out of 256 is a DOM-like document tree.  And yet> that forces your parser to have an optional cutoff point,> which none of> the standard implementations have.  My own fast, minimalist, DOM-like> parser does that, but only after a bitter lesson from cruel reality.>>   Who lied to you and told you SAX was a good idea?Are we talking about a DOM-like document tree being required for XML-basedlanguages? If so, XSLT is not an example where one is needed. The Xalan XSLTimplementation uses SAX to parse it's stylesheets. What other XML-basedlanguage implementations have tried and failed to use SAX?


More information about the Python-listmailing list

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp