Movatterモバイル変換

GUI Toolkit API?

• Previous message (by thread):building python2-2.1-4.src.rpm on mdk7.2 fails
• Next message (by thread):GUI Toolkit API?
• Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

Vadim Zeitlin <zeitlin at seth.lpthe.jussieu.fr> wrote:> On 21 Apr 2001 18:12:18 GMT, Boudewijn Rempt <boud at rempt.xs4all.nl> wrote:>>However, if you want to have all the great extensions that>>every toolkit provides, then you'll have to write emulation code for>>the missing bits, _if_ you're set on using what's already available.>>That's the position of wxWindows. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I rather>>had the impression that all the really interesting, high-level widgets>>wxWindows offers are custom-coded for wxWindows, like the html-widget.>  wxHTML is one of the rare examples - most of the other other controls are> implemented natively at least on one platforms (usually Win32 where the native> LNF is the most important). I think only wxGrid doesn't have any native> implementations - the other high-level widgets such as wxTreeCtrl or> wxListCtrl are implemented natively under Win32. Maybe someone will write the> GTK+ versions of those one day as well (in fact, they do exist, but wxWin> versions are better and so nobody is interested in using/improving them).That's more or less what I mean - if platform A has a great X, thenyou'll want to emulate that on platform B and C - and if sometimes youhave to write something fresh anyway - with the chance of creatingsomething that's better than anything already in existence.-- Boudewijn Rempt  |http://www.valdyas.org | Christos Voskrese!

• Previous message (by thread):building python2-2.1-4.src.rpm on mdk7.2 fails
• Next message (by thread):GUI Toolkit API?
• Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]