Movatterモバイル変換

[Python-ideas] Fwd: Define a method or function attribute outside of a class with the dot operator

• Previous message (by thread):[Python-ideas] Fwd: Define a method or function attribute outside of a class with the dot operator
• Next message (by thread):[Python-ideas] Fwd: Define a method or function attribute outside of a class with the dot operator
• Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

On Sat, Feb 11, 2017, at 00:33, Greg Ewing wrote:> Chris Angelico wrote:> > Which is why these proposals always seem to gravitate to "anything you> > can assign to",>> There might be some parsing difficulties with that, e.g.>>     def foo(x)[5](y, z):>        ...>> That should be acceptable, because foo(x)[5] is something> assignable, but foo(x) looks like the beginning of the> definition of a function called foo. I'm not sure whether> the parser would cope with that.We could require parentheses to be used anywhere the grammar otherwisecouldn't handle it, like yielding a tuple from a generator expression.def (whatever)(args):This does raise the question though of what the function's name/qualnamewould be. It's cosmetic, but it's also the only real difference betweendef and an assignment *now*, so it's worth considering. In the casewhere the last element of the expression is an attribute, the name wouldsimply be the attribute, but would the class portion of the qualname(and the name when it's not an attribute) need to depend on the runtimevalue of what is being assigned, or would it simply use a string ofexactly "foo(x)[5]"?

• Previous message (by thread):[Python-ideas] Fwd: Define a method or function attribute outside of a class with the dot operator
• Next message (by thread):[Python-ideas] Fwd: Define a method or function attribute outside of a class with the dot operator
• Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]